Local Anaesthetics in Dentistry: A Series
Local Anaesthetics in Dentistry: A Series
Local Anaesthetics in Dentistry: A Series
net/publication/313880931
Article in South African dental journal. Suid Afrikaanse tandarts tydskrif · February 2017
CITATIONS READS
0 1,571
1 author:
Desigar S Moodley
University of the Western Cape
50 PUBLICATIONS 132 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Desigar S Moodley on 22 February 2017.
DS Moodley
ABSTRACT
Failure in local anaesthesia in dentistry is not uncommon ACRONYMS
with failure rates ranging approximately between 15% and IANB: inferior alveolar nerve block
30%, especially for the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). In SI: supplemental infiltration
fact of all the nerve blocks which may be administered in the
human body the IANB has the highest failure rate (Malamed, may also influence the success of local anaesthesia, fac-
2012). Therefore, the aim of this series of articles is the dis- tors related to the operator.
cuss some of the causes of failure in local anaesthesia and
make recommendations so as to minimize the experience.
Effect of Anatomical Causes for
Current trends like computer controlled local anaesthetic de- Anesthetic Failures
livery, reversal of soft tissue anaesthesia for patient comfort An understanding of the variations in innervation to the
and “needle free” anaesthesia will be discussed. teeth would help improve the dentist’s ability to induce
profound local anaesthesia.6,7 The trigeminal nerve sup-
Introduction plies sensory function to both the maxillary and man-
dibular teeth. The inferior alveolar nerve, a branch of the
In Dentistry, failure of local anaesthetics is not uncommon
posterior division, supplies sensation to all the mandibular
and is in fact a feature of dental practice.1,2 Clinical suc-
teeth on one side as well as to the mucosa of the lower
cess of local anaesthetics ranges roughly between 75%
lip and skin over the chin. However, simply blocking this
and 90 %.1,3,4 The inferior alveolar nerve block records the
nerve through the traditional inferior nerve block does not
highest failure rate compared with all other nerve blocks in
guarantee complete pulpal numbness in 30% of the pa-
the human body.5 Despite the problems in achieving local
tients.8 Using ultrasound-guided technique, Hannan et al.8
anaesthesia in Dentistry, there are few studies that have at-
showed that a direct hit on the nerve does not guarantee
tempted to determine the mechanisms for these failures.3 In
complete pulpal anaesthesia in spite of obtaining 100%
clinical practice incomplete anaesthesia can lead to a pain-
lip numbness. Thus, complete lip numbness does not
ful experience for the patient as well as being a frustrating
necessarily indicate complete pulpal anaesthesia of the
encounter for the clinician, leading to about 10% of cases
mandibular teeth and the accuracy of needle placement is
having to be postponed. An understanding of the reasons
not the primary reason for pulpal anaesthetic failure with
for failure could help to reduce its occurrence. Thus, the
this block. Accessory or supplementary nerve supply to
aim of this article is to discuss some of the possible causes
the mandibular teeth, in addition to that from the inferior
of failure in local anaesthesia in Dentistry and to make rec-
alveolar nerve, may be a plausible explanation for failed
ommendations which may minimize the problem.
anaesthesia in mandibular teeth.9 Only 5.4% of patients
have no accessory canals while the majority (81%) of pa-
Failure of local anaesthetics tients have between two to six accessory canals.10 Gupta
Lack of success in obtaining complete anaesthesia in et al.11 found accessory foramina in the mandible in 94% of
dentistry may be related to anatomical, physiological or their cases. It may seem that having no accessory canals
psychological factors. Anatomical variations at the site of may be an exception as more often accessory canals can
the injection, infection or inflammation at the injection site be found in the mandible. When these accessory canals
and medical or psychological problems with which the transmit nerve fibres, local anaesthesia may fail as these
patient may present, can affect the anaesthetic outcome branches passing through the accessory canals may pro-
(patient related factors). Choice of anaesthetic agents, the vide an “escape pathway” for sensation. In addition to the
use of vasoconstrictors and experience of the operator inferior alveolar nerve in the mandible, the lingual nerve,
the long buccal nerve, the nerve to mylohyoid, the au-
DS Moodley: PhD, MSc, PDD Aesthet. BDS, FICD. Department of
riculotemporal nerve and the cervical nerves have been
Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western implicated as possible accessory suppliers of sensation
Cape, Cape Town, South Africa. Private Bag X1, Tygerberg, 7505. to the mandibular teeth.2,12 The auriculotemporal nerve, a
Tel: 021 9373090 E-mail: [email protected]
branch of the anterior division of the mandibular nerve,
www.sada.co.za / SADJ Vol 72 No. 1
communication <
33
Supplemental injections
Retromental foramen
Occasionally traditional techniques of anaesthesia like
infiltration and regional block injections may not provide
successful anaesthesia especially in endodontics for the
so-called inflamed pulp (hot tooth) or irreversible pulpitis.
Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of accessory nerve supply to the According to the American Association of Endodontics, a
mandible recent systemic review to evaluate the anaesthetic success
rates of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) injection
technique alone or along with supplemental infiltration (SI)
technique when used for pulpal anaesthesia of mandibular
Intraligamental injection
posterior teeth with irreversible pulpitis, indicated that none
of the techniques gave 100% success rate.15 When inferior
alveolar nerve block alone was used only 14-39% success
rate was obtained but when supplemental injections were
included, success was significantly increased to 50-65%
for irreversible pulpitis.15
In approximately 5-10% of mandibular posterior teeth with 21. Reisman, D, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Weaver, J. Anaes-
irreversible pulpitis, supplemental injections, even when thetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of
repeated, do not produce profound anaesthesia; pain 3% mepivacaine in irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surgery, Oral
persists when the pulp is entered.22 This is an indication Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
1997 ; 84(6): 676–82.
for an intrapulpal injection. Onset is usually immediate and
no special syringes or needles are required. The disad-
vantage is that the injection is painful.
Conclusion
Accessory nerve supply especially to the mandibular
teeth seems to provide an “escape” route for pain and
may contribute to failed anaesthesia in the dental chair. In
these instances, the dental clinician needs to block these
accessory nerve supplies to ensure complete anaesthesia
for their patients.
References
1. Ajarmah, JA, Tbashat, JM, Omor, RA, Rassas, EA, Abur-
man, KK. Operators’ experience and the success rate of infe-
rior nerve block anaesthesia. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal
2013;33(1):137-40.
2. Meechen, J. Why does local anaethesia not work every time?
Dental Update 2005; 32, 66-72.
3. Hargreaves, K, Keiser, K. Local anaesthetic failure in Endo-
dontics: mechanisms and management. Endodontic Topics
2002;1: 14.
4. Vinckier, F. What is the cause of failure of local anaesthesia?
Revue Belge de Medecine Dentaire 2002; 55(1): 41–50.
5. Malamed SF. Handbook of Local Anaesthesia. 6th ed.
Malamed SF, editor. Vol. 33, Elsevier. St. Louis: Elsevier Mos-
by; 2013. p25-38.
6. Blanton, P, Jeske, A. Anatomical considerations: avoiding
complications in local anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003a;
134(July): 888-93.
7. Blanton, P, Jeske, A. The key to profound local anaesthesia :
Neuroanatomy. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003b ;134(June):753-60.
8. Hannan, L, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Meyers, WJ. The use
of ultrasound for guiding needle placement for inferior alveolar
nerve blocks. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol En-
dod. 1999; 87:658-65.
9. Säkkinen, J, Huppunen, M, Suuronen, R. Complications follow-
ing local anaesthesia. Nor Tannlegeforen Tid. 2005;115:48-52.
10. Aps, J K M. Number of accessory or nutrient canals in the hu-
man mandible. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 ;18(2): 671-6.
11. Gupta, S, Singh, P, Soni, A. Morphological study of accessory
foramina in mandible and its clinical implication. Indian Journal
of Oral Sciences 2013; 4(1): 12.
12. Rodella, L F, Buffoli, B, Labanca, M, Rezzani, R. A review of
the mandibular and maxillary nerve supplies and their clinical
relevance. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57(4):323-34.
13. Rodella, L F, Buffoli, B, Labanca, M, Rezzani, R. A review of
the mandibular and maxillary nerve supplies and their clini-
cal relevance. Archives of Oral Biology 2011:57: 323–34.
doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.09.007.
14. Heasman, P A, Beynon, A D. Clinical considerations from axon-
myelin relationship in human inferior alveolar nerve. International
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1987; 16(3): 346–51.
15. Yadav, S. Anaesthetic success of supplemental infiltration in
mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic re-
view. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(3):182-6.
16. Meechan, J G. Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia.
International Endodontic Journal 2002; 35:885-96.
17. Wong, J K. Adjuncts to local anaesthesia: Separating fact
from fiction. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001 ; 67:391–7.
18. Kim, S. Ligamental injection: a physiological explanation of its
efficacy. Journal of Endodontics 1986 ; 12(10): 486–91.
19. Malamed SF. Handbook of LocalAnaesthesia 1997 4th ed;
p.224. St. Louis: Mosby.
20. Sykes, P. The paroject periodontal ligament syringe :a clinical
review. Dental Practice 1991; 29:22-3.