IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS

Development of Textile Based Strain Sensor from Polypyrrole

To cite this article: Abdul Malik Rehan Abbasi et al 2018 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 414 012009

View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 139.81.155.14 on 14/09/2018 at 04:01

ICAET-2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 414 (2018) 012009 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/414/1/012009
1234567890‘’“”

Development of Textile Based Strain Sensor from Polypyrrole

Abdul Malik Rehan Abbasi1, Zamir Ahmed Abro 1,3 and Syed Kamran Sami2
1
Department of Textile Engineering, BUITEMS, Quetta 87300, Pakistan
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, BUITEMS, Quetta 87300, Pakistan
3
College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shangai, China

Email. [email protected]

Abstract. The conducting polymers are polyconjugated, which possess electronic properties of
metals, while retaining the mechanical properties and processability of conventional polymers.
Conductive polymers can only withstand limited strain before breaking and cannot perform
well in evaluating large strains. The aim of this study was to develop a low cost, small to large
strain sensor using Polypyrrole and Latex/Polyamide 6 yarn. The stretchable yarn was chosen
as the substrate due to its excellent resilience and elasticity. Polypyrrole was coated as thin film
onto the substrate by means of vapour deposition technique. The response of resistance of the
samples on 2% deformation and relaxation during 40 cycles was analysed. The sensitivity or
the change in resistance per unit deformation was used as a tool to figure out the suitability of
strain sensor. The high resistive sample gave better sensitivity as well as uniformity as
compared to low resistive sample which made it suitable to use as a strain sensor.
Keywords. Strain sensor, polymers, polypyrrole

1. Introduction
Electrically conducting polymer films can only withstand limited strain before breaking and cannot
perform well in evaluating large strains [1]. To overcome this problem, substrates were employed to
provide the necessary support and the surface for conducting polymer film deposition. Generally,
fabricating a strain sensor using this approach means that the mechanical properties are highly
attributed to the substrate while the conducting polymer introduces the electrical conductivity. This
practice is commonly found in the research field of smart textiles which are conductive fabrics
produced by coating conducting polymers onto commercial fabrics such as nylon, polyester and Lycra
[2-5]. Although excellent results have been demonstrated with smart textiles using conducting
polymers, the intended applications are mainly aimed at enhancing the usability of fabric beyond its
current use as a protective layer. As a general-purpose strain sensor, the substrate requires having some
degree of rigidity and fabrics are not an ideal material due to its soft structure. Furthermore, repetitive
strain can cause permanent elongation on individual fibres where the strain may not be distributed
equally. This can lead to individual fibres having different mechanical properties that will affect the
strain sensing performance. The proposed solution is to replace fabric with Latex/PA6 stretchable
yarn, which has good combination of rigidity and elasticity. One of the studies has succeeded in
fabricating a strain sensor using PPy and natural rubber substrate where PPy powder is embedded into
the structure of the rubber directly [6]. Compared to the coating methods, that approach requires
knowledge of rubber manufacture as well as an access to the equipment to produce rubber with
consistent mechanical properties.
This work is aimed at developing a low cost, small to large strain sensor using PPy and
Elastodien/PA6. This stretchable yarn was chosen as the substrate due to its excellent resilience and
elasticity. Commercial Elastodien/PA6 strip was purchased and used to produce the strain sensor. PPy
as thin film was coated onto this substrate by means of vapour phase polymerisation technique that
provides a good adhesion between the two components of the strain sensing element.

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
ICAET-2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 414 (2018) 012009 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/414/1/012009
1234567890‘’“”

2. Materials
2.1 Elastodiene /polyamide-6
For developing the strain sensor, PA6 wrapped Elastodien yarn manufactured by PEGA® Czech
Republic, was selected as a substrate for the deposition of PPy. The microscopic image is shown in
figure 1 and the specifications of this yarn are described in table 1.

Table 1. The particulars of PA6 wrapped Elastodien yarn

Properties Index
Diameter of Elastodien [mm] 0.6
Effective diameter of whole thread* [mm] 0.68
Linear density of Elastodien [tex] 36.8
Fineness of PA6 [tex] 22x3
-1
No. of turns of PA6 around Elastodien [cm ] 12
PA6 42
Composition [%]
Elastodiene 58
*Yarn packing density was assumed as μ = 0.525 [7]

Figure 1 The microscopic image of Elastodien wrapped with PA6

2.2 Chemicals
Pyrrole is available in the market with different synonyms such as 1H-Pyrrole, Divinylenimine,
Imidole, Azole, Monopyrrole, 1-Aza-2,4-cyclopentadiene. For this study Pyrrole 98% was received
from Alfa Aesar® and was used after distillation to remove colouring impurities.
Anhydrous Iron(III) Chloride 97% was ordered from Sigma-Aldrich® and was used as received. It
has molar mass 162.2 g.mol-1 and 2.898 g.cm-3 density. Tetraethylammonium p-toluenesulfonate also
called tosylate (TsO-) was obtained from Aldrich and was used as received.

3. Methodology

2
ICAET-2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 414 (2018) 012009 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/414/1/012009
1234567890‘’“”

3.1 Sample preparation

An aqueous liquor bath was prepared using 2:1 molar ratio of FeCl3 and TsO-. This molar ratio
between oxidant and dopant was optimized by the series of experiments in our previous work [8]. As
FeCl3 follows exothermic reaction when comes in contact with water, ice was used to reduce the
temperature of the solution around 20°C. The yarn sample was immersed in bath for 1 min followed
by squeezing at 70% pickup (maximum pickup by yarn) with the help of pneumatic squeezing rollers.
Sample was then placed with the help of holders in a glass desiccator filled with pyrrole vapours
immediately after padding and squeezing. The temperature of desiccator was kept at 20±2°C and
sample was remained into it for 6 h under ambient atmospheric pressure. Sample was then taken out
and washed with ethanol in order to stop polymerization and subsequently with plenty of distilled
water for several times to remove biproducts and unreacted chemicals. Finally, sample was dried in air
at 20±2°C for 24 h. Three different samples were prepared in exactly the same way by varying the
concentration of FeCl3 and TsO- as mentioned in the table 2.

Table 2. Recipes for the preparation of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn samples.
Sample label
Iron Chloride [mol/L] Tosylate [mol/L]
Elastodien/PA6
SY1 2.0 1.0
SY2 0.6 0.3
SY3 0.1 0.05

3.2 Measurement of electrical resistivity of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn samples

With the intention of measuring electrical resistance R of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 samples,
stainless steel clamps were used to hold the sample together with connecting wires and a digital
multimeter. The electrical resistivity ρ of the yarn sample was calculated from the equation (1), by
knowing average cross-sectional area of the yarn sample “a” and the length of the sample “L” between
two measuring electrodes.

(1)
With the objective of determining the dependence of electrical resistance on length of a sample,
the resistance was measured by varying the distance from 5 cm to 90 cm between measuring
electrodes.

3.3 Measurement of sensitivity of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn samples

With the objective of characterizing sensitivity of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn samples against
deformation, all the samples from Table 2 were subjected to cyclic loading by using tensile testing
machine Labtest from LaborTech® Ltd Czech Republic. The cycle was set for 2% strain at the jaw
moving speed of 100mm/min with a rest of 1 second at relaxed or initial position to synchronize
normal human breathing rhythm.
One set of measurement includes 40 cycles, therefore in this way 5 sets of readings were recorded
and sensitivity (dR/dε) of the yarn sample was monitored. Here dR is the average change in resistance
(R1-Ro) of the specimen calculated from 5 sets of 40 cycles during extension of 2% and dε is the
change in length [mm]. R1 is the resistance of specimen at 2mm extension whereas Ro is the resistance
at relaxation or initial point.

4. Results and discussion

3
ICAET-2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 414 (2018) 012009 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/414/1/012009
1234567890‘’“”

4.1 SEM micrographs

The SEM micrographs were taken from TESCAN® VEGA and corresponding to sample SY3 is
depicted in figure 2. It can be perceived from the figure that by vapour deposition technique, each
individual fibre is covered by PPy thoroughly, even though the structure of Elastodien/PA6 stretchable
yarn is very compact as shown in figure 1.

Figure 2. SEM micrographs of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn sample

SY3 (a) low magnification 1kx (b) high magnification 5kx.

4.2 Linear dependence of resistance on length

In order to determine the dependence of resistance on the length of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn,
sample was clamped between two stainless steel clamp type electrode and resistance was measured by
varying the distance between them as described earlier. It was found that resistance of PPy coated
Elastodien/PA6 stretchable yarn is a linearly increasing function of the distance between the electrodes
holding the yarn as shown in Figure 3. By the least squares regression for this model this relationship
can be expressed as:
R=ZD+r (2)
Where, R is the resistance [kΩ] of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn sample, D the distance
between measuring electrodes and r the resistance of the electrodes found to be 0.0001kΩ approx. in
this work. However, the slope Z is the directly proportional to the resistivity ρ in [kΩ.cm] of the PPy
coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn samples for this experiment and can be calculated as:
Z=275.63∙ρ-0.0769 (3)

Figure 3. Dependence of
electrical resistance of PPy
coated Elastodien/PA6 yarn
samples on length.
4.3 Sensitivity of strain sensor against cyclic loading

4
ICAET-2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 414 (2018) 012009 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/414/1/012009
1234567890‘’“”

The Elastodien/PA6 stretchable yarn samples were coated by PPy through vapour deposition technique
and each PPy coated sample was subjected to cyclic loading for 40 cycles. The response of resistance
of the samples on 2% deformation and relaxation during 40 cycles are plotted in figure 4.

Figure 4. Response of PPy coated Elastodien/PA6 samples at 2%

deformation for 40 cycles

From the figure 4 it can be observed that SY1 gives almost equal response dR against deformation
in terms of magnitude but this response is not consistent with the number of cycles. The SY2 gives
neither an equal response against deformation (decreases with number of cycles) nor the consistency
of the response. Whereas SY3 is the best among all the samples and it gives not only an equal response
upon deformation but also the level of consistency of the response after each cycle is outstanding. The
average response in terms of change in resistance against deformation has been calculated from 40
cycles and named as sensitivity (dR/dε) of each sample. The sensitivity levels of all PPy coated
Elastodien/PA6 samples are shown in Figure 5. Although SY3 has the highest resistivity among all
three samples under study, however it outperformed SY1 and SY2 in terms of response against small
extension. The sample SY2 has been found as the worst in terms of sensitivity and its deviation in the
results. The standard deviations of the specimens were calculated as 0.182, 0.315 and 4.49 [kΩ./mm]
for SY1, SY2 and SY3 respectively.
Although SY3 has the highest resistivity among all three samples under study, however it
outperformed SY1 and SY2 in terms of response against small extension. The sample SY2 has been
found as the worst in terms of sensitivity and its deviation in the results. The standard deviations of the
specimens were calculated as 0.182, 0.315 and 4.49 [kΩ/mm] for SY1, SY2 and SY3 respectively.

5
ICAET-2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 414 (2018) 012009 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/414/1/012009
1234567890‘’“”

Figure 5. Dependence of sensitivity of the strain

sensor on longitudinal deformation.

5. Conclusion
PPy was coated on PA6 wrapped Elastodien yarn samples through vapour phase polymerization by
varying concentration of oxidant and dopant thus samples were varied in resistivity levels. It was
found that resistance of all the samples follow exactly a linear function of length and hence follow
Ohm’s law.
The sensitivity or the change in resistance per unit deformation is a useful tool to figure the
suitability of the strain sensor out. The high resistive sample gives best sensitivity as well as
uniformity or the consistency of the response against small cyclic deformation (2%) whereas low
resistive samples fail to give the equal and uniform response. Therefore, it is suggested that this
product can be used to monitor human body movements even for very small deformations such as
breathing.

References
[1] Murray P, Spinks G, Wallace G, and Burford R 1998 Synthetic metals, 97 117
[2] Li Y, Cheng X, Leung M, Tsang J, Tao X, and Yuen M 2005 Synthetic metals, 155 89
[3] Xue P, Tao X, and Tsang H 2007 Applied surface science, 253 3387
[4] Wu J, Zhou D, Too C O, and Wallace G G 2005 Synthetic Metals, 155 698
[5] Molina J, Del Río A, Bonastre J, and Cases F 2008 European Polymer Journal, 44 2087
[6] Bunsomsit K, Magaraphan R, Edgar A, and Grady B P 2002 Colloid and Polymer Science, 280
509
[7] Militký J, Vik M, Viková M, and Křemenáková D 2004 Proceedings of 2nd SIENTEX
Conference “International Symposium of Textile Engineering (Natal: Associaçăo Brasileira
de Técnicos TEXTEIS)
[8] Abdul Malik R, Ramadan M A, Wiener J, Baheti V, and Militky J 2013 Journal of Textile
Engineering, 59 93