Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) - Scale Items and Scoring Information
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) - Scale Items and Scoring Information
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) - Scale Items and Scoring Information
net/publication/311534896
CITATIONS READS
8 40,913
1 author:
Gregory Zimet
Indiana University School of Medicine
404 PUBLICATIONS 15,514 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
HPV Vaccination: Evaluation of Reminder Prompts for Doses 2 & 3 View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Gregory Zimet on 09 December 2016.
Instructions: We are interested in how you feel about the following statements. Read each statement
carefully. Indicate how you feel about each statement.
Very Very
Strongly Strongly Mildly Mildly Strongly Strongly
Disagree Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Agree
Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.
Journal of Personality Assessment 1988;52:30-41.
Scoring Information:
Significant Other Subscale: Sum across items 1, 2, 5, & 10, then divide by 4.
http://gzimet.wix.com/mspss
There are no established population norms on the MSPSS. Also, norms would likely vary on the basis of
culture and nationality, as well as age and gender. I have typically looked at how social support differs
between groups (e.g., married compared to unmarried individuals) or is associated with other measures (e.g.,
depression or anxiety). With these approaches you can use the mean scale scores.
If you want to divide your respondents into groups on the basis of MSPSS scores there are at least two ways
you can approach this process:
1. You can divide your respondents into 3 equal groups on the basis of their scores (trichotomize) and
designate the lowest group as low perceived support, the middle group as medium support, and the high
group as high support. This approach ensures that you have about the same number of respondents in each
group. But, if the distribution of scores is skewed, your low support group, for example, may include
respondents who report moderate or even relatively high levels of support.
2. Alternatively, you can use the scale response descriptors as a guide. In this approach any mean scale score
ranging from 1 to 2.9 could be considered low support; a score of 3 to 5 could be considered moderate
support; a score from 5.1 to 7 could be considered high support. This approach would seem to have more
validity, but if you have very few respondents in any of the groups, it could be problematic.