This document discusses the legal framework of social justice in India. It begins by defining social justice and noting Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's important role in establishing it in India. It then outlines key provisions in the Indian Constitution that aim to promote social justice, such as prohibiting discrimination and making special provisions for disadvantaged groups. The document also summarizes several important court cases related to upholding reservations and rights to promote social justice. It concludes that while progress has been made, fully achieving social justice in India remains an ongoing challenge.
This document discusses the legal framework of social justice in India. It begins by defining social justice and noting Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's important role in establishing it in India. It then outlines key provisions in the Indian Constitution that aim to promote social justice, such as prohibiting discrimination and making special provisions for disadvantaged groups. The document also summarizes several important court cases related to upholding reservations and rights to promote social justice. It concludes that while progress has been made, fully achieving social justice in India remains an ongoing challenge.
This document discusses the legal framework of social justice in India. It begins by defining social justice and noting Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's important role in establishing it in India. It then outlines key provisions in the Indian Constitution that aim to promote social justice, such as prohibiting discrimination and making special provisions for disadvantaged groups. The document also summarizes several important court cases related to upholding reservations and rights to promote social justice. It concludes that while progress has been made, fully achieving social justice in India remains an ongoing challenge.
This document discusses the legal framework of social justice in India. It begins by defining social justice and noting Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's important role in establishing it in India. It then outlines key provisions in the Indian Constitution that aim to promote social justice, such as prohibiting discrimination and making special provisions for disadvantaged groups. The document also summarizes several important court cases related to upholding reservations and rights to promote social justice. It concludes that while progress has been made, fully achieving social justice in India remains an ongoing challenge.
Topic – Legal Framework of Social Justice in India
Submitted to- Submitted by-
Mr. Akshaya Sir Srishti Rajpoot 18/ILB/085 Introduction- The term social justice was first used in 1840 by a Sicilian priest, Luigi Taparelli d'Azeglio, and given prominence by Antonio Rosmini Serbati in La Constitution Civile Secondo la Giustizia Sociale in 1848. It has also enjoyed a significant audience among theorists since John Rawls book. A Theory of Justice has used it as a pseudonym of distributive justice. Dr. Ambedkar and social justice- Bharat Ratna Babasaheb Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the Chief Architect of Constitution of India, is the man of millennium for social justice, in the sense that he became the deliverer of or the Messiah of the Dalits, the erstwhile untouchables, Other Backward Classes (OBCs), and women, constituting 95% of Hindu population. That big segment of population had been forced to live at a sub-human level from time immemorial, under caste system, sanctioned by Hindu scriptures. He was the man of millennium for social justice, since he was the first man in history to successfully lead a tirade of securing social justice to the vast sections of Indian humanity, with the help of a law, which practically repealed the concerned portions of Hindu scriptures. Social justice in India– Social justice denotes the equal treatment of all citizens without any social distinction based on caste, color, race, religion, sex and so on. It means absence of privileges being extended to any particular section of the society, and improvement in the conditions of backward classes (SCs, STs, and OBCs) and women. Social Justice is the foundation stone of Indian Constitution. Indian Constitution makers were well known to the use and minimality of various principles of justice. They wanted to search such form of justice which could fulfill the expectations of whole revolution. Social justice found useful for everyone in its kind and flexible form. Although social justice is not defined anywhere in the constitution but it is an ideal element of feeling which is a goal of constitution. Feeling of social justice is a form of relative concept which is changeable by the time, circumstances, culture and ambitions of the people. Social inequalities of India expect solution equally. Social justice in Indian Constitution- Article 19 enshrines the fundamental rights of the citizens of this country. The seven sub-clauses of Article 19(1) guarantee the citizens seven different kinds of freedom and recognize them as their fundamental rights. Article 19 considered as a whole furnishes a very satisfactory and rational basis for adjusting the claims of individual rights of freedom and the claims of public good. Articles 23 and 24 provide for fundamental rights against exploitation. Article 24, in particular, prohibits an employer from employing a child below the age of 14 years in any factory or mine or in any other hazardous employment. Article 31 makes a specific provision in regard to the fundamental right to property and deals with the vexed problem of compulsory acquisition of property. Article 38 requires that the state should make an effort to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice social, economic and political shall inform all the institutions of national life. Article 39 clause (a) says that the State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes, or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. Article 41 recognizes every citizen’s right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness & disablement and in other cases of undeserved want. Article 42 stresses the importance of securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief. Article 43 holds before the working population the ideal of the living wage and Article 46 emphasizes the importance of the promotion of educational and economic interests of schedule castes, schedule tribes and other weaker sections. Article 15 (1) prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. The state would be entitled to make special provisions for women and children, and for advancement of any social and educationally backward classes of citizens, or for the SC/STs. A similar exception is provided to the principle of equality of opportunity prescribed by Article 16 (1) in as much as Article 16(4) allows the state to make provision for the resolution of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the state, is not adequately represented in the services under the state. Article 17 proclaims that untouchability has been abolished & forbids its practice in any form & it provides that the enforcement of untouchability shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law. These are the constitutional provisions relating to social justice in India. Case laws relating to social justice- Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v/s Hansrajbai V. Kodala (2001) the Apex Court held that "The object is to expeditiously extend social justice to the needy victims of accidents curtailing delay - If still the question of determining compensation of fault liability is kept alive, it would result in additional litigation and complications in case claimants fail to establish liability of defendants - Wherever the Legislature wanted to provide additional compensation, it has done so specifically." The Supreme Court has firmly ruled in Balbir Kaur v/s Steel Authority of India (2000) that "the concept of social justice is the yardstick to the justice administration system or the legal justice and it would be an obligation for the law Courts to apply the law depending upon the situation in a manner whichever is beneficial for the society" as the respondent Steel Authority of India was directed to provide compassionate employment to the appellant. In Superintending Engineer, Public Health, U.T. Chandigarh v/s Kuldeep Singh (1997) the Supreme Court held that "It is the duty of the authorities to take special care of reservations in appointments as a part of their constitutional duties to accord economic and social justice to the reserved categories of communities. If ST candidate is not available, the vacancy has to be given to SC candidate and the reserved roster point has to be filled in accordingly". In Ashok Kumar Gupta v/s State of U.P. (1997) it was held by the Apex court that "To give proper representation to SC/ST Dalits in services is a social justice which is a fundamental right to the disadvantaged. It cannot be said that reservation in promotions is bad in law or unconstitutional." In Consumer Education and Research Centre v/s Union of India (1995) it was held that "Social justice is a device to ensure life to be meaningful and livable with human dignity. State has to provide facilities to reach minimum standard of health, economic security and civilized living to the workmen. Social justice is a means to ensure life to be meaningful and livable." Conclusion – Social justice is a much wide term than one can think, as justice has different meaning for all similarly social justice to. In a country like India where there are so much social inequality prevailing in the system from past, securing social justice to all is a tough question. However to much extent our judiciary won this battle against social injustice but still some loop holes remains there. It can’t be done until all for us fought against social injustice in our own way.