SLR Sample 9
SLR Sample 9
SLR Sample 9
165
The SLR is developed with the related researches from the year 2.1 . Data Search (S1 & S2):
(1995-2015) and addresses three RESEARCH QUESTIONS, so In the first step of search, we found result of total 5282
that we can understand as well as identify the critical factors papers. Among them 2455 papers are rejected on the basis of topic
which affect ingenious software project management as shown in relevance. So remaining 2827 papers are narrow down to the next
the table.1. Based on this systematic literature review, this phase of selection. Number of research papers per phase is shown
research study helps a lot in understanding the critical factors that in figure.2. In selection no.1, the result was 87 papers. In next
enhance the innovation standards and decrease the effects of phase, just 20 papers were selected. During the phase of
uncertainty in the innovative projects and how different stake assessment of quality a total of assessed papers were 20 and
holders of the organizations e.g. managers and other team among them we selected just 17 papers after critical assessment.
members prepare for the future critical problems and challenges in On these 17 papers we performed data exploration which results
their projects. The paper is distributed in the following sections: in 144 evidences and 103 quotes. In last phase of synthesis we
Methodology is described in section.2, our key findings are analyze each quotes and keeping these quotes in mind we give
described in the section.3 and Section.4 contains the conclusion. answers of each research question. Search results can be viewed
Table 1. Research questions on this link: http://labwatchman.com/slr/.
No’s Research Questions 2.2 Data exploration and assessment of
RQ.1 Ingenious software project management quality:
support which tool and technique? a) Criteria of paper selection: Paper inclusion is determined by the
RQ.2 Which practices and processes are involved relevance, addressing the research questions and decided by
in Ingenious software project management? analyzing the title, abstract, introduction and conclusion of the
research studies. Selection criteria include the following:
RQ.3 What is the connection among the i. Include only those research studies which present primarily or
organizational IT assets and capabilities with secondarily tools and techniques to support the ISPM.
Ingenious software project management?
ii. Include only those research studies which presents primarily or
secondarily practices and processes, which are in ISPM.
2. Methodology iii. Include only those research studies which presents primarily or
In research paper [10], Evidence based software engineering secondarily the link among the organizational capabilities with the
provides the standards by which the best of evidences are ISPM.
addressed in regards with this research study with human values b) Criteria of paper rejection: Paper exclusion is decided by
and practical experiences in the process of decision making by analysis of papers. Rejection criteria include the following:
just considering the software maintenance and development. For
this purpose systematic literature review is our methodology. SLR i. Reject the research study which is clearly irrelevant, according
process: Systematic literature review examines the evidence in to the research questions;
transparent and systematic way. The process starts with protocol
definition and there are five stages: Data Search, Selection no.1 ii. Reject the research study which does not answer any of the
research questions;
(S1), Selection no.2 (S2), Data exploration and assessment of
quality (DE & AOQ), Figure.1 shows the data synthesis (DS). iii. Reject the research study which is repeated, if it exists in
various search sources, the first ever search will be considered.
iv. Reject the research study which is duplicate, if similar studies
are presented in two papers, only the latest research study will be
included.
v. Exclude all research works which are published earlier than
1995.
vi. All researches must be in English.
166
2.3 Data synthesis: In the category of model and approaches, author in [16]
The assessment of quality is considered to be an important showed a helical model whose focus is on innovative solution and
criterion to analyze the research studies. Selected research studies creativity. It also proposed some experimentations and continuous
were assessed to determine the evidence strength and for feedback. The helical model gives a better development
analyzing the generated results ad recommendations. There is no methodology for the production of innovative software projects in
such single definition for quality, however, many checklists the suitable environment.
includes the questions to obtain the extent to which the influence In [17], author identifies and analyze the process models
is decreased and the external and internal validity are increased. regarding soft wares in the context of embedded development.
[9]. Author suggested a matrix that helps the related model for the
We carried out detailed study of 20 research works and project. Author presented three realities which are related to our
eliminate 3 research works. We selected just 17 papers after study: First thing is the underestimation regarding the size of the
critical assessment and after detailed study find our answers of our project as well as its complexity, immature new technology and
research questions which are explained in Research Findings Research oriented development. Amongst them the most suitable
portion. model is spiral model, adaptive s/w development and feature
driven development. Great attention has been achieved when
3. Research Finding research on agile approach towards the project management. As
We were successful in our research findings except one result the author from the paper [19] showed the idea of visual
unfortunate thing i.e. our review didn’t recognize and single out project management methods which are based on the principles of
any previous systematic review about the ingenious software ACM. In last, author from the paper [20] argued and showed
project management. Thus in our opinion, this research study is basically three practices that represents the approach of neo-
considered to be first systematic literature review (SLR) on this realistic to the software project management which is based on the
theme. From this theme we find that 17 studies were held which experiences to manage the software research projects.
are related indirectly or directly to this specific area. In the category of process, different critical factors support
This section discusses many findings about those critical the ingenious software project management was crucially
factors which affect ingenious software project management, also observed. Some are discussed earlier in the literature: Prototyping,
followed by those above stated research questions. As we organic integration and experimentation. Author from the paper
discussed in section.1, there are many ways to manage the [14] investigated the factors that have important impacts on the
innovative projects and there is a need to add more and more innovation projects of any organization. It is our belief that these
creativity with some typical processes. However, conventional proofs and evidences contribute to identify and understand the
project management tools and techniques are not helpful while innovative projects need typical and specialized processes to
managing the projects with more innovation. The complexity enhance the idea generation and creativity.
paradigm keeps innovation because a very strong link is there in
between the disorganization and creativity [21]. 4. Conclusion
The project based approach looks good as it is most relevant
In [7], author presented the use of two very important and approach on the organizational environment. This is the time
critical factors to support the ingenious software project when we realize to release the energy in the projects. While
management. When included the fuzzy numbers in the phase of keeping in mind critical project failure rate, it become significant
planning of projects, it helped project managers a lot. Other aspect for the organizations to pay some more attention to their activities
is the practice of analytical risk breakdown matrix, needs help to regarding the research projects, keeping in mind their potential
resolve the uncertainty level and risks. A lot of creativity is advantages. For the organizational point of view, the key to
applied to various areas e.g. pervasive systems and robotics. In success is just and just innovation. We found that numbers of
this context, author in [11] proved a new successful tool which research papers have been increased on innovation projects from
enables integration as well as communication of the people. So last ten years and there came a factor of awareness too to handle
within the organization there held a knowledge sharing. with the challenges and to manage the projects. Some factors have
been identified that have an impact on management and
In [12], author argued the utilization of social media to
performance regarding the innovative projects during the process
enhance the innovation. Innovation data are modelled using
of review. Our research study also identifies four techniques that
ontologies through the semantically enhanced platform. While
support best monitoring and planning, helps to manage to lesser
semantic methods & techniques are applied, there is a possibility
the uncertainties or encourage the innovation. In our study we
to enhance the open management of innovation. In [13], author
found proofs that the flexible, organic and informal structure of
argued that there is one factor that affects the ingenious software
the companies supports the innovative behavior and idea
project management is Organizational capabilities. While
generation. In terms of processes, we identify that various models
proceeding with this, author in [14] added some words as: Ability
are there for the innovations that are managed appropriately.
of an organization to produce new processes and products.
Finally our research finding contribute to the SPM, while
In [15], author argued that to get a success in new product or providing a better understanding of the uncertainties and the other
service development, a systematic structure is a need by an challenges while dealing with the ingenious software project
organization which allows information sharing and other management.
important communication resources across the functional areas
Limitation of this research study is that we just narrow the
and supporting the resolution of conflicts. Innovative projects
scope of study related to the S/w projects and also the results of
need usage of previous and existing processes so that to meet the
research cannot be generalized but some factors need management
new features of these projects.
to identify impact on the success of other type of projects.
Empirical studies regarding ingenious software project
167
management should have to be conducted to access the factors review”, In Information and software technology, vol. 51, no.
presented in this study in the future work. 1, pp. 7–15.
[11] Afridi, A. H. (2012) “Workflow engineering for
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS crowdsourcing in project management towards a human-
We would like to thanks Dr. Muhammad Abbas for the support
computers services”, In Engineering, Technology and
and supervision in completing this research study
Innovation (ICE), 18th International ICE Conference on.
6. REFERENCES IEEE.
[1] OSLO (2005). “OSLO manual: Guidelines for collecting and [12] Rodríguez-García, M. Á., Valencia-García, R., Alcaraz-
interpreting innovation data”. Paris: Organization for Mármol, G., and Carralero, C. (2014). “A Knowledge-Based
Economic Co-operation and Development. & Statistical Platform for Managing Innovative Software Projects”, In On
Office of the European the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2014
Communities.http://www.oecdbookshop.org/get- Workshops (pp. 309-318). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
it.php?REF=5LGPBVQFQ4G5&TYPE=browse. [13] Bannerman, P. L. (2013) “Barriers to Project Performance”,
[2] Marinho, M.; Sampaio, S. and Moura, H. (2013) “An In Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference
approach related to uncertainty in software projects”, In on System Sciences (HICSS '13). IEEE Computer Society,
Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), IEEE International Washington, DC, USA, 4324-4333.
Conference, pages 894–899. IEEE. [14] Koc, T. (2007) “Organizational determinants of innovation
[3] Filippov, S., and Mooi, H. (2010). “Innovation project capacity in software companies”, In Computers & industrial
management: A research agenda”, In Journal on Innovation engineering, pages 373—385, Elsevier.
and Sustainability. RISUS ISSN 2179-3565, 1(1). [15] Davies, A. and Brady, T. (2000) “Organisational capabilities
[4] Wu, W. W., Rose, G. M., and Lyytinen, K. (2011). and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable
“Managing Black Swan Information Technology Projects”, solutions”, In Research Policy, pages 931—953, Elsevier.
In System Sciences (HICSS), 44th Hawaii International [16] Deakins, E., and Dillon, S. (2005). “A helical model for
Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE. managing innovative product and service initiatives in
[5] Moe, N. B., Barney, S., Aurum, A., Khurum, M., Wohlin, C., volatile commercial environments”, In International Journal
Barney, H. T., and Winata, M. (2012). “Fostering and of Project Management, 23(1), 65-74.
sustaining innovation in a fast growing agile company”, In [17] Kettunen, P., and Laanti, M. (2005). “How to steer an
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (pp. 160- embedded software project: tactics for selecting the software
174). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. process model”, In Information and Software Technology,
[6] O’Connor, G. C. and Rice, M. P. (2013) “A comprehensive 47(9), 587-608.
model of uncertainty associated with radical innovation”, In [18] Spundak, M. (2014) “Mixed Agile/Traditional Project
Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 30, no. S1, Management Methodology-Reality or Illusion?”, In
pages 2–18. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, pages 939—948,
[7] Dodevska, Z., and Mihic, M. (2014). “Theory of complexity Elsevier.
and innovation projects”, In Proceeding of the XIV [19] Conforto, E. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2010). “Evaluating an
International Symposium (SymOrg 2014), p 1460. Faculty of agile method for planning and controlling innovative
Organizational Sciences. University of Belgrade. projects”, In Project Management Journal, 41(2), 73-80.
[8] Travassos, G. H. and Biolchini, J. (2007) “Histórico de [20] Berggren, C., Järkvik, J., and Söderlund, J. (2008).
Revisões Sistemáticas. Revisões sistemáticas aplicadas à “Lagomizing, organic integration, and systems emergency
engenharia de software”, In XXI SBES-Brazilian wards: innovative practices in managing complex systems
Symposium on Software Engineering. development projects”, In Project Management Journal,
[9] Kitchenham, B.A. (2007) “Guidelines for performing 39(S1), S111-S122.
Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering”, In [21] Luna, A. J. H. de O., Kruchten, P., Pedrosa, M. L. G. E.,
EBSE Technical Report, version 2.3, Keele University and Almeida Neto, H. R. de, & Moura, H. P. de. (2014). “State of
University of Durham. the Art of Agile Governance: A Systematic Review”, In
[10] Kitchenham, B.A., Brereton, O.P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., IJCSIT, 6(5), 121–141.
Bailey, J. and Linkman, S. (2009) “Systematic literature
reviews in softwareengineering–a systematic literature
168