What About Vietnam?: Power Distance
What About Vietnam?: Power Distance
What About Vietnam?: Power Distance
If we explore the Vietnamese culture through the lens of the 6-D Model©, we can get a
good overview of the deep drivers of Vietnamese culture relative to other world
cultures.
POWER DISTANCE
This dimension deals with the fact that all individuals in societies are not equal – it
expresses the attitude of the culture towards these inequalities amongst us. Power
Distance is defined as the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions
and organisations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed
unequally.
Vietnam scores high on this dimension (score of 70) which means that people accept a
hierarchical order in which everybody has a place and which needs no further
justification. Hierarchy in an organisation is seen as reflecting inherent inequalities,
centralization is popular, subordinates expect to be told what to do and the ideal boss is
a benevolent autocrat. Challenges to the leadership are not well-received.
INDIVIDUALISM
The fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is the degree of interdependence a
society maintains among its members. It has to do with whether people´s self-image is
defined in terms of “I” or “We”. In Individualist societies people are supposed to look
after themselves and their direct family only. In Collectivist societies people belong to ‘in
groups’ that take care of them in exchange for loyalty.
MASCULINITY
A high score (Masculine) on this dimension indicates that the society will be driven by
competition, achievement and success, with success being defined by the winner/best
in field – a value system that starts in school and continues throughout organisational
life.
A low score (Feminine) on the dimension means that the dominant values in society are
caring for others and quality of life. A Feminine society is one where quality of life is the
sign of success and standing out from the crowd is not admirable. The fundamental
issue here is what motivates people, wanting to be the best (Masculine) or liking what
you do (Feminine).
UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE
The dimension Uncertainty Avoidance has to do with the way that a society deals with
the fact that the future can never be known: should we try to control the future or just
let it happen? This ambiguity brings with it anxiety and different cultures have learnt to
deal with this anxiety in different ways. The extent to which the members of a culture
feel threatened by ambiguous or unknown situations and have created beliefs and
institutions that try to avoid these is reflected in the score on Uncertainty Avoidance.
Vietnam scores 30 on this dimension and thus has a low preference for avoiding
uncertainty. Low UAI societies maintain a more relaxed attitude in which practice counts
more than principles and deviance from the norm is more easily tolerated. In societies
exhibiting low UAI, people believe there should be no more rules than are necessary and
if they are ambiguous or do not work they should be abandoned or changed. Schedules
are flexible, hard work is undertaken when necessary but not for its own sake, precision
and punctuality do not come naturally, innovation is not seen as threatening.
INDULGENCE
One challenge that confronts humanity, now and in the past, is the degree to which
small children are socialized. Without socialization we do not become “human”. This
dimension is defined as the extent to which people try to control their desires and
impulses, based on the way they were raised. Relatively weak control is called
“Indulgence” and relatively strong control is called “Restraint”. Cultures can, therefore,
be described as Indulgent or Restrained.