Bridge Health Monitoring System: Atharva Kekare, Pranit Huddedar, Rohit Bagde
Bridge Health Monitoring System: Atharva Kekare, Pranit Huddedar, Rohit Bagde
Bridge Health Monitoring System: Atharva Kekare, Pranit Huddedar, Rohit Bagde
e-ISSN: 2278-2834,p- ISSN: 2278-8735.Volume 9, Issue 3, Ver. IV (May - Jun. 2014), PP 08-14
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: In developing countries like India there is strong focus on national infrastructure .New bridges are
build every year. The maintenance of these bridges is many times overlooked. And the present systems use
complicated and high cost wired network and high maintenance optical fiber system. So the main objective
behind this project is to build a cheap bridge health monitoring system for developing countries.
Keywords: Bridge health monitoring system(BHMS), Accelerometer, Anemometer, Load Cell, LM35
I. Introduction
Bridges are continuously subjected to destructive effects of material aging, widespread corrosion of
steel reinforcing bars in concrete structures, corrosion of steel structures and components, increasing traffic
volume and overloading, or simply overall deterioration and aging. These factors, combined with defects of
design and construction and accidental damage, prompt the deterioration of bridges and result in the loss of load
carrying capacity of bridges. The condition of heavily used urban bridges is even worse: one in three are
classified as aging or unable to accommodate modern vehicle weights and traffic volume. Therefore, a
significant number of these structures need strengthening, rehabilitation, or replacement, but public funds are
not generally available for the required replacement of existing structures or construction of new ones.
Bridges can suffer structural deterioration due to aging, misuse or lack of proper maintenance. Among
the many factors which have led to the unsatisfactory condition of bridge structures, one factor that has been
neglected is the unsatisfactory inspection and monitoring of existing structures. The most common objectives
for monitoring a bridge are to obtain quantitative data about the structural behavior in order to confirm design
assumptions and to provide real-time feed-back during construction (especially true for new bridges), and to
evaluate the real current condition of the bridge and allows the engineers to take informed decisions about their
future and to plan maintenance or repair actions (especially for existing bridges). In the later, the monitoring
system is used to increase the safety of the structure and provide early warning of an acceleration of the known
degradations that are being monitored. And the application of SHM to existing bridges to perform a controlled
lifetime extension of the bridges with known problems has greatly increased in recent years.
There are many bridges in Japan and China which are very advanced as compared to the monitoring
systems in Konkan. So our aim is to develop a system that is reliable, cheap and more efficient for Indian
bridges. This system will not only be useful for the railway bridges but also for the road bridges, foot bridges.
www.iosrjournals.org 8 | Page
Bridge Health Monitoring System
All elastic members when exited will vibrate with certain natural frequencies. These natural
frequencies are a function of their stiffness’s. These natural frequencies can be monitored over a period of time
(called the vibration signature) and any shift towards the lower end of spectrum indicates reduction in stiffness
of the structure. The Engineer can then direct his efforts for detailed inspection along with necessary
instrumentation for such bridges where reduction in stiffness beyond certain permissible limit is detected.
The equipment is user friendly. The instrument can be set up even on the foot path of the bridge with
the help of leveling screws. Each recording takes about 5 minutes and the instrument can store data for about 40
recordings. The data can be transferred on to permanent storage devices such as personal computer and the
vibration signature (frequency plot) can be viewed /analyzed and stored for future reference.
On September 22, 1998, Typhoon No.7 occurred in the central area of the Kii Peninsula (east of Akashi
Kaikyo Bridge). The wind direction and wind speed was measured by the anemometer near the middle of the
center span and so did the transversal displacement of the related girder. By applying wind-tunnel test results
and the wind resistant design guidelines for Akashi Kaikyo Bridge, a transversal displacement of 5.41m and
vibration amplitude of 2.56m were calculated. The field-measured values showed a transversal displacement of
5.17m and vibration amplitude of 0.78m. It is confirmed that the field-measured values for transversal
displacement have good agreement with the calculated results, but the vibration amplitude was about one-third
of the calculated value.
The Akashi Kaikyo bridge has a center length of 1991m , and it extremely flexible structure with low
natural frequency which makes high wind resistance necessary
Therefore the wind resistance design standards for the Akashi Kaikyo bridge were established (HSBA
1990).
During construction the bridge was tested which showed its wind resistance to be 78m/s
When the wind speed exceeds this value a warning is given by the monitoring system.
The Akashi Kaikyo Bridge can handle accelerations due to earthquakes of magnitude of 8.5 Richter scale.
During an event of earthquake the bridge is shut down automatically.
www.iosrjournals.org 9 | Page
Bridge Health Monitoring System
www.iosrjournals.org 10 | Page
Bridge Health Monitoring System
The micro-controller we have used is “PIC16F877A”.We’ve used LCD display to display the 4
parameters constantly. We have used a GSM SIM300 module for sending messages and RF module to
constantly send the parameters to the control station.
We are going to use a computer as a Control Station where we have used Visual Basics 6.0 to display the
parameters which are sending via the RF module.
4. Block Diagram
www.iosrjournals.org 11 | Page
Bridge Health Monitoring System
sensor is recalibrated we haven’t connected a signal conditioning circuit for it. An alarm and a LCD are
connected to the microcontroller. The alarm is triggered when the values of the sensors exceeds the threshold
value. The LCD is used to display the parameters constantly. All the parameters are constantly transmitted
through the RF Module to a remote PC. The RF Module is interfaced to the microcontroller through the driver
IC. At the receiver the RF Module is connected to a PC through a driver.
There is a GSM module which is used if there is a need to warn any authorities which are responsible
for the maintenance of the bridge. The GSM band used in INDIA is 850 MHz to 900 MHz. So we have used the
SIM 900 GSM module which supports India’s frequency band.
The PIC reads the output from sensors using “A to D” conversion, displays on LCD. The
microcontroller sends this data to remote display unit in concerned office using RF Module. The remote display
unit receives the data using RF Module and displays on the LCD.
This is the module we have made in Visual Basics to display the parameters on the computer which works as
control station.
We are using the software named TERMINAL, version 1.9b for connecting the RF module to the PC
through the COM ports. The readings are continuously sent to the PC from the RF module through the serial to
USB convertor cable we have used.
www.iosrjournals.org 12 | Page
Bridge Health Monitoring System
SMART Structures
(Choo 2009 thesis) The term “smart structure” has been increasingly used in the bridge SHM
communication. Literature review has yielded various definitions of “smart structures”. Simply “smart
structures” was defined as structures incorporated with sensors in some of the most advanced building materials
(Tennyson 2000) or structures integrated sensing system (Measures 2001). A detailed definition by Phares et al.
(2005) is given as:
A “Smart” technology is one in which the system systematically reports on the condition of the
structure by automatically making engineering-based judgments, records a history of past patterns and
intensities, and provides early warning for excessive conditions or for impending failure without requiring
human intervention. These features make the system capable of providing and facilitating self-diagnostic, real-
time continuous sensing, advanced remote sensing, self-organizing, self-identification, or self-adaptation
(decision making and alarm triggering) functions. Further, the user is not burdened with demanding operational
and maintenance tasks.
Phares et al. (2005) further elaborated that these features make the system capable of providing and
facilitating self-diagnostic, real-time continuous sensing, advanced remote sensing, self-organizing, self-
identification, or self-adaption (decision making and alarm triggering) functions. The user is also not burdened
with demanding operational and maintenance tasks.
“Smart structures” can thus be simply summarized as structures that are instrumented with SHM
system that proactively report the structural condition and warn the users upon the detected damage and
deterioration within the structures.
Live Structures
Live structures represent the cutting edge of civil engineering design and analysis. These are, at
present, largely theoretical types of structure that will be possible one day in the not-so-distant future. Live
structures are not only able to sense loads, deformations, and/or damage (through sophisticated SHM and
analysis systems), but they are also able to respond to the sensory input and take action to counter or correct the
effects of loading. Recent developments in the area of self-actuating materials – materials which can change in
shape and mechanical properties on command – are allowing civil engineers to consider the day when intelligent
structures will both sense and respond to external loads and environmental influences.
2) Advantages:
Improved understanding of in-situ structural behaviour
Early damage detection
www.iosrjournals.org 13 | Page
Bridge Health Monitoring System
3) Disadvantages:
The only disadvantage is that the sensors should not fail when there is an adverse condition.
So there must be a system incorporated which will detect sensor failure
References
Journal Papers:
[1]. Yongtao Dong and Ruiqiang Song, “Synthesis of Knowledge and Technology” Bridges Structural Health Monitoring and
Deterioration Detection, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
[2]. D.Niranjan Reddy and P.G.R.Nair, “Bridge Monitoring through Vibration Signatures”, Konkan Railway Corporation limited.
[3]. “Real-time bridge health-monitoring for management”, US-Japan Center to Center Cooperative Research in Urban Earthquake
Disaster Mitigation between Disaster Prevention Institute, Kyoto University and Southern California EQ Research Center under
NSF.
Books:
[1] Waltenegus Dargie and Christian Poellabauer, Fundamentals of Wireless Sensor Networks (Wiley, July 2010)
[2] Feng Zhao and Leonidas Guibas Wireless Sensor Networks First edition (Elsevier publication)
www.iosrjournals.org 14 | Page