Ex-Post Facto Law Article 20 (1) Says That No Person Shall Be Convicted of Any Offence

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Article 20 has taken care to safeguard the rights of persons accused of crimes.

Persons
here means the citizens, non-citizens as well as corporations. Please note that this article
can not be suspended even during an emergency in operation under article 359. Article
20 also constitutes the limitation on the legislative powers of the Union and State
legislatures.

Ex-Post facto Law Article 20 (1) says that no person shall be convicted of any offence
except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as
an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been
inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence. This is
called Ex-Post facto Law.

It means that legislature can not make a law which provides for punishment of acts
which were committed prior to the date when it cam into force. This means that a new
law can not punish an old act.

Example- If a person ‘A’ commits an offence in the year 1947, as per the act in that year
the punishment was imprisonment of fine or both the same act was amended in 1949
which enhanced the punishment of the same offence by as additional fine. In such a case
the punishment enhanced would not be applicable to the act of 1947, the same would be
set-aside.

Doctrine of Double Jeopardy

Article 20(2) says that no person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence
more than once. This is called Doctrine of Double Jeopardy. The objective of this article
is to avoid harassment, which must be caused for successive criminal proceedings,
where the person has committed only one crime. There is a law maxim related to this –
nemo debet bis vexari. This means that no man shall be put twice in peril for the same
offence. There are two aspects of Doctrine of Jeopardy viz. autrefois convict and
autrefois acquit. Autrefois convict means that the person has been previously convicted
in respect of the same offence. The autrefois acquit means that the person has been
acquitted on a same charge on which he is being prosecuted. Please note that
Constitution bars double punishment for the same offence. The conviction for such

1|Page
offence does not bar for subsequent trial and conviction for another offence and it does
not matter the some ingredients of these two offences are common.

Self Incrimination Law

Article 20(3) of the constitution says that no person accused of any offence shall be
compelled to be a witness against himself. This is based upon a legal maxim which
means that No man is bound to accuse himself. The accused is presumed to be innocent
till his guilt is proved. It is the duty of the prosecution to establish his guilt.

Relevant Provision of the Evidence Act-

25. Confession to police officer not to be proved

No confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any
offence.

26. Confession by accused while in custody of police not to be proved


against him

No confession made by any person whilst he is in the custody of a police officer, unless it
be made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate, 17 shall be proved as against such
person.

27. How much of information received from accused may be proved

Provided that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequences of information


received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much
of such information, whether if amounts to a confessions or not, as relates distinctly to
the fact thereby discovered, may be proved.

2|Page

You might also like