Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Ejemplo de Aplicación: Evaluación Numérica de La Respuesta Dinámica - Newmark

    Uploaded by

    Luis Fenco Gonzales
    This document presents an example application of numerically evaluating dynamic response using the Newmark method. It contains information on period, natural frequency, damping ratio, and time step used in the analysis. It then shows a table with time increments and the calculated ground acceleration, structural acceleration, velocity, and displacement at each time step. The analysis was performed to model the dynamic response of a structure under the 17 October 1966 Lima, Peru earthquake.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ejemplo de Aplicación: Evaluación Numérica de La Respuesta Dinámica - Newmark

    Uploaded by

    Luis Fenco Gonzales
    10 views1 page
    This document presents an example application of numerically evaluating dynamic response using the Newmark method. It contains information on period, natural frequency, damping ratio, and time step used in the analysis. It then shows a table with time increments and the calculated ground acceleration, structural acceleration, velocity, and displacement at each time step. The analysis was performed to model the dynamic response of a structure under the 17 October 1966 Lima, Peru earthquake.

    Original Description:

    evaluacion dinamica

    Original Title

    Untitled 4

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document presents an example application of numerically evaluating dynamic response using the Newmark method. It contains information on period, natural frequency, damping ratio, and time step used in the analysis. It then shows a table with time increments and the calculated ground acceleration, structural acceleration, velocity, and displacement at each time step. The analysis was performed to model the dynamic response of a structure under the 17 October 1966 Lima, Peru earthquake.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    10 views1 page

    Ejemplo de Aplicación: Evaluación Numérica de La Respuesta Dinámica - Newmark

    Uploaded by

    Luis Fenco Gonzales
    This document presents an example application of numerically evaluating dynamic response using the Newmark method. It contains information on period, natural frequency, damping ratio, and time step used in the analysis. It then shows a table with time increments and the calculated ground acceleration, structural acceleration, velocity, and displacement at each time step. The analysis was performed to model the dynamic response of a structure under the 17 October 1966 Lima, Peru earthquake.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    EVALUACIÓN NUMÉRICA DE LA

    RESPUESTA DINÁMICA
    3. EJEMPLO DE APLICACIÓN

    EVALUACIÓN NUMÉRICA DE LA RESPUESTA DINÁMICA - NEWMARK


    Sismo de Lima del 17/10/1966 N-S
    Ing. Erly Marvin Enriquez Quispe
    [email protected]

    T: Periodo de la Estructura (s)


    ωn: Frecuencia natural angular (rad/s )
    ξ: Fracción de amortiguamiento crítico
    ϒ: Coeficiente gama
    β: Coeficiente beta
    Δt: Variación del tiempo (s)

    A C 22.88 1.10
    B D 0.16 986.96

    t (s) u''gi u''i u'i


    0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
    0.02 -14.25 12.99 0.13 0.00
    0.04 -7.78 1.67 0.28 0.00
    0.06 -6.30 -5.05 0.24 0.01
    0.08 1.49 -15.31 0.04 0.01
    0.10 3.00 -13.76 -0.25 0.01
    0.12 -1.75 -1.65 -0.41 0.00
    0.14 1.73 2.87 -0.39 -0.00
    0.16 5.06 6.23 -0.30 -0.01
    0.18 0.14 14.68 -0.09 -0.01
    0.20 -4.58 17.17 0.23 -0.01
    0.22 0.27 4.63 0.44 -0.00
    0.24 6.34 -9.98 0.39 0.00
    0.26 3.44 -11.98 0.17 0.00
    0.28 1.71 -10.63 -0.06 0.00
    0.30 -2.35 -3.40 -0.20 0.00
    0.32 -4.16 2.58 -0.20 0.00
    0.34 -0.10 1.95 -0.16 -0.00
    0.36 -4.36 8.23 -0.06 -0.00
    0.38 -3.77 6.77 0.09 -0.00
    0.40 3.12 -2.78 0.13 -0.00
    0.42 0.36 -1.99 0.08 0.00
    0.44 2.89 -5.35 0.01 0.00
    0.46 8.30 -9.22 -0.13 0.00
    0.48 -0.83 3.71 -0.19 -0.00
    0.50 -6.09 11.03 -0.04 -0.00
    0.52 -2.19 5.62 0.12 -0.00
    0.54 -3.51 3.25 0.21 -0.00
    0.56 -6.27 1.16 0.26 0.00
    0.58 -2.99 -6.73 0.20 0.00
    0.60 2.42 -13.68 0.00 0.01
    0.62 1.57 -9.61 -0.24 0.00
    0.64 0.79 -2.39 -0.36 0.00
    0.66 7.57 -1.60 -0.40 -0.00
    0.68 5.94 7.38 -0.34 -0.01
    0.70 -1.77 18.73 -0.08 -0.01

    ING. ERLY MARVIN ENRIQUEZ QUISPE Pág. 4

    You might also like