Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Interpretation of The Proposed Philippine General Hospital Expansion OETS, Taft Avenue, Ermita, Manila
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Interpretation of The Proposed Philippine General Hospital Expansion OETS, Taft Avenue, Ermita, Manila
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Interpretation of The Proposed Philippine General Hospital Expansion OETS, Taft Avenue, Ermita, Manila
Activity No. 2
Prepared by:
KIMBERLYN J. SOMERA
BSCE – 5A
Schedule:
Tuesday and Friday
8:00-11:00 A.M.
Submitted to:
SCOPE OF WORK
Three (3) boreholes were advanced in the site by using Concore drilling machines. The length of
boreholes is 42.0m, 30.0m, and 43.50m for BH-1, BH-2, and BH-3 respectively. Standard
Penetration Test (SPT) was conducted by obtaining disturbed soil samples taken from the
borehole with the use of a 2.0-inch outside diameter and 1-3/8-inch inside diameter split spoon
sampler driven with the help of 140-lb hammer free-falling from a height of 30 inches. In
between sampling sections, the hole was advanced using the rotary wash method. The
obtained N values represent the number of blows required to drive the sampler to at least 300
mm of penetration distance. SPT was also conducted in between coring layers where the
recovery is very poor. After the sample and tube are brought to the surface and separated, the
sample is removed from the tube and properly preserved and sealed using a moisture tight
plastic bag for further testing in the laboratory. For reference purposes, Tables 1 and 2 show
the correlation between SPT N-values and shear strength parameters for cohesion less and
cohesive soils
FIELD TEST
The depth of boreholes extended deeper than the originally intended depth of 30 meters in
order to reach a hard strata. The recorded SPT N-values may be correlated to determine the soil
strength parameters. Certain correction factors are used to account for Hammer Efficiency,
Sampler Type, Rod Diameter, and Rod Length. The corrected SPT N-value is then called N60.
The N60 values are given in Figure 1. These values may be used in correlating the strength
parameters given in Table 1 and Table 2. The average N60 value across three boreholes
generally increases with depth with an average of 20.
The underlying soils are composed mostly of silty clay and sandy clay with traces of gravel and
seashells. The top soil up to 12.00 meters from the EGL is very weak with an average N60 value
of 3. From this information, we infer that a shallow foundation system for most mid-rise and
high-rise buildings will not be viable. Meanwhile, the hard clay is encountered between 27 to
40 meters below the EGL. The N60 of ≥30 is attained at 39.0m for BH-1, 27.0m for BH-2, and
40.0m for BH3. At this zone between 27 to 40 meters below the EGL, it is highly likely that
refusal shall be attained by most pile driving operations. Therefore, this advanced report shall
focus on pile load capacities that will possibly be attained at these depths under dynamic or
static driving techniques. In choosing the pile driving technique, surrounding structures should
be considered and vibration should be minimized. Splicing of piles should be avoided;
otherwise, splicing shall not be done on more than one location. The results of the effective
stress method of analysis using both ends bearing resistance at the pile tip and skin friction are
given in
Table 4
a safety factor equivalent to 3.0. To optimize the capacity of piles and avoid uniform and
differential settlement, it is required for piles be driven to practical refusal level. Probe piles
may be installed to confirm the achievable penetrations and to exactly determine the refusal
level. Preferably, a two-phase pile testing program is employed wherein the first phase involves
verifying the calculated pile capacities, and secondly, verifying the quality of the installed piles.
The static or instrumented dynamic tests is suggested to be conducted early on problem piles
so that any necessary changes or adjustments can be made on the rest of the piles to avoid
over or under design.
Any excavation work must make use of a suitable slope protection system to protect the
adjacent roads and properties from damage due any lateral soil movement along the
excavation face. In this case, since the water table is considerably shallow, a water tight
excavation system is recommended with the sheet pile system being one of the more
economical choices. If sheet piles are used, it must consider the upward transition of water. The
slope protection design is beyond the scope of this evaluation and is usually delegated to the
excavation contractor.
The analysis and design of foundation for the proposed structure are beyond the scope of this
report. The foregoing analyses, conclusions and recommendations were based on the subsoil
investigation data from three (3) boreholes.
Underlying soil conditions may vary from borehole location to another and thus, may not be
taken by-fact as the entire site’s actual subsoil condition. Should any difference in the subsoil
condition be observed during excavation or construction works, the undersigned should be
informed immediately by the Project Manager so that necessary actions can be made.