Joint Obligations Hand Outs
Joint Obligations Hand Outs
Joint Obligations Hand Outs
In a joint obligation “each obligor answers only for a part of the whole liability and to each
obligee belongs only a part of the correlative rights.” Whereas, in “a solidary or joint and several
obligation, the relationship between the active and the passive subjects is so close that each of
the former or of the latter may demand the fulfi llment of or must comply with the whole
obligation.” (8 Manresa 194)
Philippine credit corporation vs Court of appeals G.R. No. 109648. November 22, 2001
A solidary obligation is one in which each of the debtors is liable for the entire obligation, and
each of the creditors is entitled to demand the satisfaction of the whole obligation from any or all
of the debtors. On the other hand, a joint obligation is one in which each debtors is liable only for
a proportionate part of the debt, and the creditor is entitled to demand only a proportionate part
of the credit from each debtor. The well-entrenched rule is that solidary obligations cannot be
inferred lightly. They must be positively and clearly expressed. A liability is solidary "only when
the obligation expressly so states, when the law so provides or when the nature of the obligation
so requires." Article 1207 of the Civil Code explains the nature of solidary obligations in this
wise
Liabilities of Partners
If it arises out of a contract, the liability is joint or pro rata. (Art. 1816, Civil Code).
Exception = if the dependents of an employee claim compensation for the employee’s
death in line of duty. (Liwanag, et al. v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, GR L-
12164, May 22, 1959).
If it arises out of a crime or a quasi-delict, the liability is solidary (together with the
partnership). (Arts. 1822, 1823 and 1824, Civil Code).
Liabilities of agents
In general — joint, even if appointed at the same time, unless solidarity has been agreed
upon. (Art. 1894, Civil Code).
Liabilities of Violators of Arts. 19, 20, 21, 22 (on Human Relations) of the Civil Code
Although the law does not expressly say so, it is believed that infractors thereof should be
held liable in solidum, considering the fact that said violations are either penal in nature
or contrary to morals. These are perhaps cases where there is solidarity because of the
nature of the obligation. ( Art. 1207, Civil Code).