(IJCST-V8I2P28) :sai Sruthi Gadde, Venkata Dinesh Reddy Kalli
(IJCST-V8I2P28) :sai Sruthi Gadde, Venkata Dinesh Reddy Kalli
(IJCST-V8I2P28) :sai Sruthi Gadde, Venkata Dinesh Reddy Kalli
in a continuum, based on the number of human detect diabetic retinopathy with a sensitivity that is
constraints put on the algorithm. equal or greater than that of ophthalmologists. This
An example of a high-level machine-learning method model got the diagnosis from the raw pixels of the
in the form of so-called deep learning models has images without any human interference outside a
recently emerged. Deep learning models are team of ophthalmologists who annotated the correct
astonishingly complex neuron networks that have diagnosis on each image [8]. Since the task is
been developed to construct accurate models from mastered with little to no human experience, these
raw data directly [7]. Recently researchers have profound learning algorithms are fundamental in the
demonstrated an in-depth learning algorithm that can Master Spectrum of Learning.
care research practice, but the idea of a theoretical or A specific science discipline focused on philosophy,
clinical model must not be thrown out entirely. mathematics, and computer science that aims at
Unfortunately, machine learning protects from the understanding and creating structures that exhibit
typical problems faced by observational data analysis intelligence properties [15].
is simply nothing magical [14]. In fact, it does not Machine Learning
defend against prejudice by merely running machine A sub-discipline of AI in which computer programs
learning methods on Big Data. Increased-sample size, (algorithms) learn predictive power correlations from
for example, is not going to address the bias issue if data examples. The implementation of mathematical
the data collection lacks essential clinical seriousness models on computers is most obviously machine
indicators such as cancer stage in a breast cancer learning. Machine learning uses a wider variety of
model. mathematical methods that are popular in medicine.
New techniques like Deep Learning are based on
models where the underlying information is less
expected and thus capable of processing more
complex data [16].
Deep Learning
Deep learning methods allow a computer to supply
large quantities of raw data to detect or classifying
the necessary representations. Detailed methods for
learning are focused on multiple data layers with
successive transformations that amplify input aspects
of discrimination, which are essential to remove
irrelevant variations. Profound schooling can be
regulated or unregulated. Deep learning approaches
are responsible for many of the new machine learning
advancement [17].
Supervised Learning
Computer training programs to learn links between data inputs and outputs through analysis of interest outputs
identified by a (typically human) supervisor. After the understanding of correlations, they may predict future
instances based on current evidence. This is one of the best-known fields in machine learning, with many cases in
and outside of healthcare [18].
Unsupervised Learning
Computer programs which learn associations with data without external association concept. In comparison to
simply building upon existing connections, unsupervised learning may classify previously unknown forecasters [19].
Reinforcement Learning
Computer programs that learn behavior by maximizing a given reward. This strategy is inspired by conduct
psychology and was widely used in games where knowledge is ideal, with several potential choices and no specific
worldwide fault costs [20].
high resolution and the appropriate data sharing [10] Gul, Muhammad Tayyab, Ali Sami Dheyab,
frameworks and collaborative work to create both Ekremah Kheun Shaker, Norhayati
productivity and health. Muhammad, and Aslia Natasha Pauzi. "In
vitro evaluation of anti-urolithiatic
REFERENCES properties of Strobilanthes crispus extracted
using different solvents." Research Journal
of Chemistry and Environment. Vol 24
[1] Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, et al.
(2020): 1.
Development and validation of a deep
[11] Marcus G. Deep learning: A critical
learning algorithm for detection of diabetic
appraisal. arXiv:1801.00631. 2018.
retinopathy in retinal fundus
[12] Atun R, Aydın S, Chakraborty S, Sümer S,
photographs.JAMA. 2016;316(22):2402-
Aran M, Gürol I, et al. Universal health
2410.
coverage in Turkey: enhancement of equity.
[2] Brand RJ, Rosenman RH, Sholtz RI, et al.
Lancet. 2013;382:65-99. Medline:23810020
Multivariate prediction of coronary heart
doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61051-X
disease in the Western Collaborative Group
[13] Henglin M, Stein G, Hushcha PV, Snoek J,
Study compared to the findings of the
Wiltschko AB, Cheng S. Machine learning
Framingham study. Circulation.
approaches in cardiovascular imaging. Circ
1976;53(2):348-355.
Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:e005614.
[3] Weber GM, Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Finding
Medline:28956772
the missing link for big biomedical
doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.005614
data.JAMA. 2014;311 (24):2479-2480.
[14] Stanford University. Algorithm outperforms
[4] Atun R. Transitioning health systems for
radiologists at diagnosing pneumonia
multimorbidity. Lancet. 2015;386:721-2.
[Internet]. Stanford News. 2017. Available:
Medline:26063473 doi:10.1016/ S0140-
https://news.stanford.edu/2017/11/15/algorit
6736(14)62254-6
hm-outperforms-radiologists-diagnosing-
[5] Kocher R, Sahni NR. Rethinking health care
pneumonia/. Accessed: 20 March 2018.
labor. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1370-2.
[15] Johnson AE, Pollard TJ, Mark RG. 2017,
Medline:21995383 doi:10.1056/
November. Reproducibility in critical care: a
NEJMp1109649
mortality prediction case study. Machine
[6] Badawi O, Brennan T, Celi LA, Feng M,
Learning for Healthcare Conference 2017.
Ghassemi M, Ippolito A, et al. Making big
JMLR W&C Track Volume 68. Available:
data useful for health care: a summary of the
http://proceedings.mlr.
inaugural mit critical data conference. JMIR
press/v68/johnson17a/johnson17a.pdf.
Med Inform. 2014;2:e22. Medline:25600172
Accessed: 20 March 2018.
doi:10.2196/medinform.3447
[16] Celi LA, Moseley E, Moses C, Ryan P,
[7] Jones SS, Heaton PS, Rudin RS, Schneider
Somai M, Stone D, et al. From
EC. Unraveling the IT productivity
pharmacovigilance to clinical care
paradox—lessons for health care. N Engl J
optimization. Big Data. 2014;2:134-41.
Med. 2012;366:2243-5. Medline:22693996
Medline:26576325
doi:10.1056/NEJMp1204980
doi:10.1089/big.2014.0008
[8] LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep
[17] Brynjolfsson E, Mcafee AN. The business of
learning. Nature. 2015;521:436.
artificial intelligence. Harv Bus Rev. 2017.
Medline:26017442 doi:10.1038/nature14539
Available: https://hbr.org/cover-
[9] Beam A, Kohane I. Big data and machine
story/2017/07/the-business-of-artificial-
learning in health care. JAMA.
intelligence. Accessed: September 2018.
2018;319:1317-8. Medline:29532063
[18] Helpman E, Trajtenberg M. Diffusion of
doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18391
general purpose technologies. National
Bureau of Economic Research. 1996. No. [30] Adams S. Is Coursera the beginning of the
w5773. end for traditional higher education?Higher
[19] Trajtenberg M. AI as the next GPT: a Education; 2012.[22]Cicchetti D. Neural
Political-Economy Perspective. National networks and diagnosis in the clinical
Bureau of Economic Research. 2018. No. laboratory: state of the art.Clin Chem
w24245. 1992;38:9–10.
[20] Kalli, Venkata & Gadde, Sai. (2020). [31] Cochran AJ. Prediction of outcome for
Technology Engineering for Medical patients with cutaneous melanoma.
Devices - A Lean Manufacturing Plant PigmentCell Res 1997;10:162–
Viewpoint. 9. 1-6. 7.[24]Exarchos KP, Goletsis Y, Fotiadis DI.
10.17148/IJARCCE.2020.9401. Multiparametric decision support system for
[21] Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Artificial theprediction of oral cancer reoccurrence.
intelligence, automation and work. National IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed
Bureau of Economic Research 2018. No. 2012;16:1127–34.
w24196. [32] Kononenko I. Machine learning for medical
[22] Siddartha M. The algorithm will see you diagnosis: history, state of the art
now. New Yorker. 2017;93:46-53. andperspective. Artif Intell Med
[23] Rajpurkar P, Irvin J, Zhu K, Yang B, Mehta 2001;23:89–109.[26]Park K, Ali A, Kim D,
H, Duan T, et al. CheXNet: radiologist-level An Y, Kim M, Shin H. Robust predictive
pneumonia detection on chest x-rays with model for evaluatingbreast cancer
deep learning. arXiv:1711.05225v3 [cs.CV]. survivability. Engl Appl Artif Intell
[24] Golden JA. Deep learning algorithms for 2013;26:2194–205.
detection of lymph node metastases from [33] Sun Y, Goodison S, Li J, Liu L, Farmerie
breast cancer: helping artificial intelligence W. Improved breast cancer prognosis
be seen. JAMA. 2017;318:2184-6. throughthe combination of clinical and
Medline:29234791 genetic markers. Bioinformatics
doi:10.1001/jama.2017.14580 2007;23:30–7.
[25] Bychkov D, Linder N, Turkki R, Nordling [34] Bottaci L, Drew PJ, Hartley JE, Hadfield
S, Kovanen PE, Verrill C, et al. Deep MB, Farouk R, Lee PWR, et al. Artificial
learning based tissue analysis predicts neuralnetworks applied to outcome
outcome in colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. prediction for colorectal cancer patients in
2018;8:3395. Medline:29467373 separate in-stitutions. Lancet 1997;350:469–
doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3 72.
[26] Ein-Dor L, Kela I, Getz G, Givol D, [35] Maclin PS, Dempsey J, Brooks J, Rand J.
Domany E. Outcome signature genes in Using neural networks to diagnose cancer.
breastcancer: is there a unique set? JMed Syst 1991;15:11–9.
Bioinformatics 2005;21:171–8. [36] Simes RJ. Treatment selection for cancer
[27] Ein-Dor L, Zuk O, Domany E. Thousands of patients: application of statistical
samples are needed to generate a robustgene decisiontheory to the treatment of advanced
list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc ovarian cancer. J Chronic Dis 1985;38:171–
Natl Acad Sci 2006;103:5923–8. 86.
[28] Ayer T, Alagoz O, Chhatwal J, Shavlik JW, [37] Akay MF. Support vector machines
Kahn CE, Burnside ES. Breast cancer risk combined with feature selection for
es-timation with artificial neural networks breastcancer diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl
revisited. Cancer 2010;116:3310–21. 2009;36:3240–7.
[29] Platt JC, Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. [38] Chang S-W, Abdul-Kareem S, Merican AF,
Large margin DAGs for multiclass Zain RB. Oral cancer prognosis based
classifica-tion; 1999 547–53. onclinicopathologic and genomic markers
using a hybrid of feature selection