Material 6 - Concept On Variance of Estimation PDF
Material 6 - Concept On Variance of Estimation PDF
Material 6 - Concept On Variance of Estimation PDF
Concept on Estimation
Variance
Extension Variance and Estimation Variance
• Estimation using one sample value where the value is extended to the larger
volume known as ”Extension” Extension Variance.
• While estimation based on several values where the values are extended to the
volume known as “Estimation” Estimation Variance.
Estimation of One Sample v and Extension to Volume V
(Extension Variance)
Z V Z x dx U
For V: 1
VV
While v is volume (drill core, mined ore blocks) with the values are
known.
Z v Z x dx U *
1
For v: vv
E (v to V) = Var Z v
Z V E2 U* U
v , V
total x y forallx in v dan all y in V
totalpoints
dx x y dy
1
=
vV v V
V, V
total x y for allx in V andally in V
numbertotalpoints
dx x y dy
1
=
VV V V
v ,v is the average of x y , where x and y are points location independent each
other in volume v:
v , v
total x y for allx in v andally in v
numbertotalpoints
dx x y dy
1
=
vv v v
dx x y dy
1
-
VV V V
varianceV
dx x y dy
1
vv v v
- variancev
• The formula is valid for all domain, where v can be as: point, line, plane, or
volume, while V also can be as line, plane, or volume.
• Calculation on differential of the relation v to V can be represented by table or
nomogram.
Estimation Number of (N) Samples S and Extension to Volume V (Estimation
Variance)
In the field, we often know a number of samples values z(xi) at some locations xi.
The average value of block or reserve is estimated through the average sample
values: N
z x
1
U
*
i
N i 1
Estimation of
some samples
points xi to the
volume V
Matheron (1971) gave the estimation variances as:
N
x y dy
2 covarianceNV
2
N
2
E i
NV i 1 V
dx x y dy
1
-
VV V V
varianceV
x yj
N N
1 varianceN
- i
NN i 1 j 1
The differentiation of that formula is analog to what we have done for extension
variance.
S, S
is influenced by the sample geometry, V, V is influenced by the
estimation geometry, while S, V is influenced by the relation between S and V.
Spatial structure
estimator Z s to unknown Z v
E2 var error Z S Z V 2 S ,V V ,V S , S
3. Estimation variance is related so much to the relative position of S sample and
their geometrical relation to the estimated volume V. In the formula, we need
to notify the geometrical relation between S and V through S,V , and
geometrical relation within S samples through S, S , also within volume V
through V ,V .
The figure below shows the different geometrical relation between S samples
and volume V which will give the different estimation variance.
is better than
5. Estimation variance has important meaning because it will predict how much
the reserve followed by the high accuracy, while we add some additional
drilling. Estimation variance N2 depends so much on h and geometrical
relation of samples.
This condition is valid for normal distribution. For another distribution, the
interval is not changed much.
Calculation on Estimation Variance
x yj
N N N
2
1
1
VV V V
Based on the basic formula:
2
E x i y dy dx x y dy i
NV i 1 V NN i 1 j 1
S, L x i ydy
1
1.L L
Auxilliary function of L, L F L has been discussed in the previous chapter
about dispersion variance:
S , S 0 (because it is auto-correlation)
x1 x1 0 0 (variogram of zero distance)
E2 2 S , L L, L S , S
S , L 1 2 L 2 1 2 L 2 L 2
L , L F L
S , S 0
E2 2 L 2 F L
We can conclude the result that one sample located in the middle of line L gives
better position compared in the side of line.
Defining variance estimation can be done easily using auxilliary functions of (L)
and F(L) either from the nomogram or table.
Extension of Point Samples S along Line L (Points S in Both Sides of Line L)
E2 2 S , L L, L S , S
1 N
• This example shows that
S , L x i ydy
N .L i 1 V
with N = 2 positioning of one sample
= 1 2 L L located in the middle of line L
2
(although the number of sample
L , L F L
is small), will give better result
x i y j
1 N N
S, S
N.N i 1 j1 rather than the samples are
=
1
x1 y 1 x1 y 2 x2 y1 x2 y 2 positioned in the sides of line.
22
=
1
0 x1 y 2 x2 y1 0 • Defining variance estimation
22
=
1
2 x1 y 2 1 x1 y 2 can be done easily using
22 2
auxilliary functions either from
in this case: 1 2 L the nomogram or table.
E2 2 L FL 1 2 L
E2 2 S , R R , R S , S
S, R x i y dy
1
N R R
The same as extension along line, the integral function can be replaced by
summation (S). Auxilliary function of Q(H,L) can be seen the next table.
Q 0.4 0.8 0.629 ; F 0.4 0.8 0.451 ; 0 0.0
E2 2 S , R R , R S , S
This function
S , R ( 4 ) ( 1 4 ) Q H 2 , L 2 Q H 2 , L 2 has been
discussed in
S , S 0 0
R , R F H , L the calculation
E2 2 Q H 2 , L 2 F H , L
of dispersion
variance
Example: R L H (0.4) (0.8)
Q 0.2 0.4 0.346 ; F 0.4
0.8 0.451 0 0 ,0
;
E2 (2) (0.346) 0.451 0.0 0.241
This example shows that the sample position in the middle of plane gives much
lower estimation variance rather than the sample is positioned in the side of plane.
Extension in 3D (Space) of Point/Line Samples
These extensions can be obtained by the similar way through some modification on
the basic formula.
Some nomograms for variogram Spherical Model has been available to define the
extension variance:
0.133 is 0.034
Nomogram for
extension/estimation
variance of point to
cubic plane for
variogram Spherical
Model with C0 = 0, C =
1 (Annels, 1991)
0.333 is 0.125
Nomogram of
extension/estimation
variance of point to
rectangular plane for
variogram Spherical
Model with C0 = 0, C =
1 (Annels, 1991)
Nomogram of
estimation variance of
points to rectangular
plane for variogram
Spherical Model with
C0 = 0, C = 1 (Annels,
1991)
Nomogram of
extension variance of
line to rectangular
plane for variogram
Spherical Model with
C0 = 0, C = 1 (Annels,
1991)
Nomogram of
extension
variance of line
to box shape for
variogram
Spherical model
with C0 = 0, C =
1 (David, 1977)
Nomogram of
extension
variance of plane
to box shape for
variogram
Spherical Model
with C0 = 0, C =
1 (David, 1977)
Variance of Global Estimation
U
N
*
U i U i* U i
i 1
If we assume that each deviation are not dependant each other, we can obtain
global estimation variance as:
Global Estimation Variance for Samples along Line with Constant Spacing
Problem:
On the traverse with length 160 m, the sampling is conducted with spacing 8 m. If the
distribution of Zn grade is represented by variogram of Spherical Model with C = 34%² and
a = 60 m, and average grade is z = 3.8%, then please calculate the global estimation
variance and its relative standard deviation!
Solution:
By the nomogram of estimation variance of Spherical Model variogram, we obtain:
E2 l E2 l a E2 8 60 E2 0.133 0.034 C 0.034 34%2
Global estimation variance for N = 20 samples on line L is:
1 1
E2 L E2 l 0.034 34%2 0.058%2
N 20
Standard deviation = E L 0.058% 0.24%
2
Problem:
We take N = 10 samples along the traverse with length 160 m, the average grade
is z 3,8% Zn . The variogram of Zn grade is Spherical Model with C = 34%²
and a = 60 m (the same as previous problem).
Solution:
Samples spacing li are listed below:
II II / a E2
I i2 I i2 E2
1
E2 L 2
321.85 34%2 0.43%2
L
E L 0.43%2 0.65%
E L / z 100% 17.2%
Global Estimation Variance of Samples within Plane
For samples within the plane, we can use the same rule as we used for samples
located along the line.
Plane R consists of N parts with different
dimension ri. Each plane has one sample (i.e. drill
hole) located in the center part.
In case, the blocks have the same dimension, then the global estimation variance
is: 2
E R E2 ()
1
N
Problem:
In a phosphat deposit, 95 drill hole samples taken with grid 5050 m². The average
value of accumulation grade and thickness is z = 365 m%. The variogram model
is Spherical with sill C = 77,912 m² %², nugget variance C0 = 30,000 m² %², and
range a = 150 m.
Question:
Please calculate the global estimation variance and its relative standard deviation!
Solution:
With h/a = l/a = 50/150 = 0.333, we get extension variance of point to rectangular
plane 0.125 so:
E2 r E2 () = C0 C 0.125 30,000 (77,912) (0.125) 39,739m2 %2
For the all part of plane we get the global estimation variance as:
1 1
E2 R E2 r 39,739m2 %2
N 95
E2 R 418.3m2 %2
20.4
Relative standard deviation = 100% 5.6%
E R 20.4 m% 365