See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/306893972

ONLINE AND OFFLINE HOTEL RATINGS: A CASE STUDY OF INDIAN HOTELS

Article  in  International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research · August 2016

CITATIONS READS
0 1,363

2 authors, including:

Tahir Sufi
Amity University
27 PUBLICATIONS   65 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Hotel Classification systems of the world, Social Media in Hospitality and Tourism View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Tahir Sufi on 26 August 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

I J A B E R, Vol. 14, No. 4, (2016): 2555-2574

ONLINE AND OFFLINE HOTEL RATINGS:

A CASE STUDY OF INDIAN HOTELS
Tahir Sufi* and Satinderpal Singh**

Abstract: Hotel classification system acts like an evaluation tool to create a hierarchy of hotels in
terms of service quality offered by the hotels. This study investigates the effectiveness of the
classification system by comparing the star ratings allocated to hotels through official classification
system of India with the guest ratings awarded to hotels on TripAdvisor and Expedia. The study
also tests the hypothesis established from literature review that the guests rate the three star
hotels more favorably as compared to higher star rated hotels. Out of 983 officially classified
hotels in India, the guest ratings of all the 595 hotels of all the six categories (One-star, two-star,
three-star, four-star, five-star and five- star deluxe) listed on TripAdvisor and Expedia were
collected.Using one way Anova, the mean guest ratings awarded by the guests on TripAdvisor
and Expedia was computed. The findings of the study indicate that the mean guest ratings of the
hotels are in proportion to the star rating awarded by classification system-thus rejecting the
hypothesis that guests favorably rate three star hotels. Further, significant correlation between
the ratings for five-star deluxe hotels, five-star hotels and four-star hotels on TripAdvisor and
Expedia was established. Finally, the descriptive analysis established the robustness of TripAdvisor
ratings because of the low standard deviation as compared to Expedia.
Key Words: Hotel classification system, online hotel ratings, online travel companies, social
media, TripAdvisor

INTRODUCTION
The hotel classification and grading system is undergoing a rapid transformation
because of technological innovations in the business world, including the hotel
industry. This is mainly due to the internet and the emergence of online travel
agents like TripAdvisor, Expedia, Yelp and many other such companies. These
OTA’s contain millions of the guest reviews who stay in the properties and
experience the major guest services and facilities about the hotel properties. The
audience of social networking sites by 2017 is expected to be 2.55 billion and India
expects to be the second largest country after china in terms of the number of
users of social media 282. 9 million (Emarketer.com, 2015).
Professor Andrew McAfee coined a term “Enterprise 2.0”to describe the impact
of social networking, social computing, and social media on business organizations

* Principal, Chandigarh College of Hotel Management, Mohali

** Dean Research, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Landran
2556 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

that led the world of business to embrace the change and rapid transformation
[McAfee 2015]. Because of such changes, making a profitable use of social media is
the top priority of many organizations [Levy, 2009]. Hospitality Industry is also
undergoing transformation because of “Enterprise 2.0” paradigm because of social-
media, which has emerged as an important channel for maintaining technological
innovations for hospitality sector, to compete and succeed in the market
(Zafiropoulos et al., 2006).
Before the advent of Internet, the travel used to be private and experiences
were shared with only small circle of acquaintances that were characterized by
mutual trust. However, with the advent of internet, the guest experiences have
converted into global databases of consumer information managed by the firms.
Further, the process has enabled the user’s real time recording and sharing of
experiences (Munar, 2010). Many studies showing the reasons for motivation for
sharing experiences online pointed at altruistic and community related motivations
including reason for helping others (Munar and Jacobsen, 2014), (Hsu et al., 2007),
social and emotional support (Baym, 2010), providing advice on practical matters
(Munar & Ooi, 2012).
The revenue from hotel business of MakeMyTrip, one of the largest online travel
portal of India increased by 55.2percent to $48.6 million from $31.3 million in 2011
and for big hotels , the business grew to almost by 100percent [Sathyanarayanan 2013].
In year 2014, India’s travel and tourism industry grew by 7.3 percent, outperforming
the general economy by 2.5 percent. India is the third largest Internet and face book
user of the world. The ecommerce industry in India recorded 88percent growth and
reached $16billion in 2013. In this segment 70 percent of the transactions were
recorded from travel industry (Soni and Mehra, 2014).
The increase in online travel business in India is clear indication of dependence
of travelers on the online options for travel and hotel related purchase decisions.
However, at the same time, [Nath 2013, Sharma 2013 and Chopra 2006] have
questioned the effectiveness of hotel classification system of India to evaluate the
hotels, as many hotels lacking basic service quality have been awarded five star
ratings.
Online travel agents like TripAdvisor and Expedia also indicate the quality of
the hotels using physical symbols scoring hotel out five.TripAdvisor ratings are
temporarily sensitive, continually reconfigured, personal and relatively based upon
unregulated content (Scott & Orlikowski 2009). TripAdvisoruses the Popularity
Index calculated through algorithms to rank the accommodation. This index
incorporates the traveler ratings to determine the traveler satisfaction putting
emphasis on the most recent information. The algorithm takes into account quality,
quantity and the recency of the reviews. The guests rate the properties on a scale
of 1-5, where 5 stands for the best. (TripAdvisor, 2014). The hotels are evaluated in
 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2557

terms of service, cleanliness, location and overall impression of the

property.Expedia which an another leading travel company on the other hand
bases its online ratings on guest feedback of Hotel services, hotel condition, room
cleanliness, room comfort, location and neighborhood. The online ratings are
computed by averaging the ratings in six areas. TripAdvisor provides the ratings
separately in each of the areas unlike Expedia.

INDIAN HOTEL AND TOURISM INDUSTRY

The professional hotel Industry in India dates back to pre-colonial times. The cities
like Calcutta, Mumbai and Delhi were among the first cities where the commercial
hotels were setup initially. The hill resorts of Shimla &Mussourie also witness setting
up of Hotels for tourists looking for cooler destinations in summers. The Hotels that
were built in early eighteenth century include Chales Ville in 1861 and Savoy in
1895 in Mussourie. In Shimla Clarkes hotel was established in 1898 and Savoy hotel
was established in 1902(Bond 2003). Jamshedji Tata the founder of Tata Empire in
Mumbai established the hotel on a grand scale in 1903 and this hotel is the first ever
hotel to be built by Indian entrepreneur in India (Allen 2008). In 1934, RaiBahadur
Man Singh, the founder of Oberoi hotel Chain took over Clarkes hotel (earlier known
as Carlton hotel) in Shimla and Delhi and in 1938; he took over Grand Hotel of
Calcutta. Other important hotels that were built during Indian British period were
The Rugby, Matheran (1876), The Grand Calcutta 1930, The Cecil, Mussoorie (1936).
Post-Independence, Jawaharlal Nehru, the First Prime Minister of India
recognized the need to build hotel for the foreign dignitaries and this led to the
building of the first Government invested hotel Ashok in New Delhi. India
witnessed a tremendous growth on economic front after independence. The
Government of India established Indian Tourism Development Corporation
(ITDC) in 1966 with the aim of establishing and operating hotels across India
(theashokgroup, 2014). In 1982, India hostel Asian games and to accommodate
the visitors many hotels were built. ITDC alone built seven hotels which include
Kanishka, Ashok YatriNiwas, Akbar hotel, Lodhi hotel, hotel Ranjit and Qutab
hotel (Davendra 2011).The Government of India granted license to Taj Palace, Asian
Hotels-Hyatt Regency, Le Meridien, and Surya Sofitel hotels which were built in
New Delhi. Another giant leap which led towards the growth of hotel Industry in
India was the transformation that took place. India which was typically a socialist
country started the economic reforms in 1990’s to become attractive destination
for investment. This led to massive growth of the Hotel Industry.

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT OF THE HOTEL INDUSTRY IN INDIA:

The term external environment refers to all those factors outside the firm which
can lead to opportunities or threats to the firm. Although there are many factors,
the most important factors are economic, Government, legal, technological,
2558 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

geographical and social. (Saleem 2010). The growth in India is distinct from growth
in the other countries. While in other countries, it has been mainly manufacturing
led growth, in India it has been service led growth. India’s service sector contributes
to as much as 56% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The Indian consumer
environment according to Federation of Indian Chambers of Comerce and Industry
(FICCI) long back in 2003-2004 was around $383 Billion. This has been mainly due
to rise of Indian “market.” In simple terms “market” means number of “buyers”
or “people”. In the service sector, tourism and hospitality holds an important place
in India. It is emerging as the biggest sector for providing jobs in India.
The policies of the Government influence the environment of business to a
great extent. Industrial policy of 1956 and1991 are the examples how Government
impacts the industries. Industrial Licensing policy, Foreign Investment policy,
Foreign Technology agreements, Public Sector policy, Monopolies and restrictive
Trade Practices ACT (MRTP ACT) etc which reflect the level of influence of
Government on business environment. The two most powerful institutions in
society today are business and Government; where they meet on the common
grounds – amicably or otherwise they determine the public policy, both domestic
and foreign for a nation (Joshi & Kapoor 2007).
The regulatory or external growth drivers that affect the industry that have
been initiated by Government of India include the following:
• Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) allowed in all construction development
projects including construction of hotels and resorts, recreational facilities.
• Reduction of expenditure tax for upscale hotels.
• Introduction of new category of visa- “Medical Visa (M) Visa) for medical
tourism.
• Tie up with UNDP for promotion of rural tourism.
• Plans to permit the issuance of visa on arrival.
• Introduction of web based Public delivery system to ease the process of
filing of the applications to bring transparency and speed up the process
of granting licenses.
• Initiatives like building the tourism infrastructure at tourist destinations.
The future of tourism and Hospitality sector looks very promising according
to the recent surveys. The wellness tourism sector in India is going to push India
on number one position in world by next five years which is growing at 20%
annually. Similarly many critical initiatives like introduction of Electronic Visa
facility (e visa), enforcing the electronic travel authorization, addition of 52,000
hotel rooms in the hotel inventory shall give boost to the tourism and Hospitality
sector in India(Ibef.org, 2014).
 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2559

At present, India has 114, 200 hotel rooms across various categories, while as
there is a shortage of 156,000 hotel rooms. This opportunity is tapped by real estate
companies like DLF, IT companies like Wipro and Infosys, private Equity firm
like C redit Suis se, Diversification of established businesses like Anil
DhirubhaiAmbani Group (ADAG) which is in talks with Starwood Hotels for
bringing St. Regis hotel (Technopak 2012).

Source: Indian Hospitality Outlook, Technopak p-9

The opportunities in Indian hospitality Market are tapped by foreign hotel

chains as well. While most of the top brands are already in India, the other brands
like Rotana&Jumeirah (UAE), Six Senses etc are planning to enter India by next
two years. The big hotel companies are already present in China that is why these
companies are now focussing on India. The main concern of these foreign hotel
chains is only finding the right partners here. Since, hotel chains take long time is
providing returns- the Indian partners who are mostly land developers expect
quick returns (Khosla&Santhyanarayanan 2014).
The impressive overall growth resulted in massive investment in the hotel
sector and new Indian and foreign Hotel Chains made their presence on Indian
landscape. The growth of Hotels in India is propelled by the increase in the tourism.
The continued “Incredible India” campaign launched by Government of India
has had a strong impact on the tourist arrivals in India (Thadani2015). Crisil research
Annual Review 2013 highlighted the following interesting facts about the Indian
Hotel Industry. The size of the Hotel Industry is USD 3.8 Billion, and is growing at
average rate of 12%. The current supply of hotel rooms is about 110,000 hotels
rooms and current demand is about 150,000 hotels rooms.
However, the major reason of the boom in the Hotel Industry is the growth in
information technology and related services. The rise of stock indicesand new
business opportunities are also attracting foreign institutional investors, funds,
equity and venture capitalists. The rising BPO industry is also contributing to
growth of the Hospitality Industry Nasscom (2013).However, certain factors pose
2560 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

a severe threat to the industry like terrorism, diseases like H1N1, travel advisories
etc.
The successful marketing of Indian Hotels resulted in the growth of these hotels
on the global scale. Many of these hotel chains are respected in international
markets. This positive image of Indian hotels helped the hotels chains in achieving
the global recognition and many hotel chains like Taj, Obeori, ISTA Hotels etc
have forayed in the International markets. Taj hotel has presence in twelve countries
(Taj Group 2014) which include UK, USA, Malaysia, Maldives, South Africa, Sri
Lanka, UAE and Zambia. Similarly, Oberoi hotels have presence in Indonesia,
Mauritius, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These hotels are respected for world class
hospitality service in the host countries. The Indian hotel business leaders like
P.R.S. Oberoi received ‘2010 Corporate Hotelier of the World’ award in New York
in November 2010 by Hotels Magazine on the basis of voting by the readers of the
magazine in more than 150 countries. The hotel chain also received the award for
being Worlds Highest Rated Luxury hotel Brand for being the best in customer
satisfaction in service, value and hotels location and cleanliness (Obeori Hotels,
2014). The future of tourism and Hospitality sector looks very promising according
to the recent surveys. The wellness tourism sector in India is going to push India
on number one position in world by next five years which is growing at 20%
annually. Similarly many critical initiatives like introduction of Electronic Visa
facility (e visa), enforcing the electronic travel authorization, addition of 52,000
hotel rooms in the hotel inventory shall give boost to the tourism and Hospitality
sector in India (Ibef.org, 2014).
At present, India has 114, 200 hotel rooms across various categories, while as
there is a shortage of 156,000 hotel rooms. This opportunity is tapped by real estate
companies like DLF, IT companies like Wipro and Infosys, private Equity firm
like C redit Suis se, Diversification of established businesses like Anil
DhirubhaiAmbani Group (ADAG) which is in talks with Starwood Hotels for
bringing St. Regis hotel (Technopak 2012).
The opportunities in Indian hospitality Market are tapped by foreign hotel
chains as well. While most of the top brands are already in India, the other brands

Source: Indian Hospitality Outlook, Technopak p-9

 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2561

like Rotana&Jumeirah (UAE), Six Senses etc are planning to enter India by next
two years. The big hotel companies are already present in China that is why these
companies are now focussing on India. The main concern of these foreign hotel
chains is only finding the right partners here. Since, hotel chains take long time is
providing returns- the Indian partners who are mostly land developers expect
quick returns (Khosla&Santhyanarayanan 2014).
The impressive overall growth resulted in massive investment in the hotel sector
and new Indian and foreign Hotel Chains made their presence on Indian landscape.
The growth of Hotels in India is propelled by the increase in the tourism. The
continued “Incredible India” campaign launched by Government of India has had a
strong impact on the tourist arrivals in India (Thadani2005). Crisil research Annual
Review 2013 highlighted the following interesting facts about the Indian Hotel
Industry. The size of the Hotel Industry is USD 3.8 Billion, and is growing at average
rate of 12%. The current supply of hotel rooms is about 110,000 hotels rooms and
current demand is about 150,000 hotels rooms. However, the major reason of the
boom in the Hotel Industry is the growth in information technology and related
services. The rise of stock indicesand new business opportunities are also attracting
foreign institutional investors, funds, equity and venture capitalists. The rising BPO
industry is also contributing to growth of the Hospitality Industry Nasscom
(2013).However, certain factors pose a severe threat to the industry like terrorism,
diseases like H1N1, travel advisories etc. As per Taj Hotels annual report 2009, the
tourist inflow felt by 3.3% in year 2009-10. The successful marketing of Indian Hotels
resulted in the growth of these hotels on the global scale. Many of these hotel chains
are respected in international markets. This positive image of Indian hotels helped
the hotels chains in achieving the global recognition and many hotel chains like Taj,
Obeori, ISTA Hotels etc have forayed in the International markets.
Taj hotel has presence in twelve countries (Taj Group 2014) which include UK,
USA, Malaysia, Maldives, South Africa, Sri Lanka, UAE and Zambia. Similarly,
Oberoi hotels have presence in Indonesia, Mauritius, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
These hotels are respected for world class hospitality service in the host countries.
The Indian hotel business leaders like P.R.S. Oberoi received ‘2010 Corporate
Hotelier of the World’ award in New York in November 2010 by Hotels Magazine
on the basis of voting by the readers of the magazine in more than 150 countries.
The hotel chain also received the award for being Worlds Highest Rated Luxury
hotel Brand for being the best in customer satisfaction in service, value and hotels
location and cleanliness (Obeori Hotels, 2014). In order to remain competitive and
address such problems, the Indian Hotels opt for joining the international hotel
chain and get slotted into multitier branding system. These international hotel
chains have an edge over independent hotels because of brand recognition. The
International Hotel Chains therefore improve their levels of services religiously
and improve their image by branding and excellent service delivery (Ambwani
2562 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

2012). The customers of these International Hotel Chains recognize the levels of
services where ever they stay and get satisfied by the services offered by the hotel.

WHAT IS A HOTEL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM?

World Tourism Organization defines hotel classification system as the ranking of
hotels, usually by using nomenclature such as stars or diamonds, with one star
donating the basic facilities and standards of comfort and five stars donating the
luxury in facilities and services. Naragajavana (2008) explained that the purpose
of the hotel classification is to inform the intending guests in advance on what can
be expected in order to reduce the gap between expected and experienced facilities
and service delivery. The term “classification”, “grading”, “rating” are used to
refer to the same concept i;e to rank the hotels by their facilities and standard.
Further, there is another term that is frequently used apart from the word
“classification” that is “Grading”. Halloway (1994) defined both the terms to clear
the difference. While classification distinguishes the hotels according to physical
features (amenities, facilities, service, and cost) for example number of guest rooms
with bathroom etc, the grading identifies hotels based on certain verifiable objective
features of service for example 24 hours coffee shop etc. Qing and Liu (1993) explained
that the hundred plus ratings worldwide can be classified into two groups- official
and unofficial ratings. While as official rating system is conducted by the Government
agencies and followed on compulsory and regulatory basis, the unofficial rating
system is carried out by the private organizations such as Hotel Associations, trade
bodies and the hotels participate on voluntary basis in these ratings. In Europe,
HOTREC (Umbrella association of Hotels, Restaurants and cafes contribute to Hotel
Classification in association with public authorities. At present, HOTREC is
responsible for classification systems of at least sixteen European countries which
include Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Sweden,
Switzerland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Belgium, Denmark and
Greece (HOTREC 2014). This is an example of unofficial grading system done be a
private organization. However, in India the Hotel classification system is regulated
by Ministry of Tourism through special committee called HRACC (Hotel and
Restaurant classification committee). This is the example of official classification.

HOTEL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS IN INDIA: PAST AND PRESENT

The process of classification of hotels in India started in 1956 when the government
set up a hotel standards and rate structure committee under the chairmanship of
M.S.Oberoi , founder of Oberoi Hotels, with the objectives of laying down criteria
for the purpose of classification of hotels in India, keeping in view international
standards that apply to similar establishments elsewhere. another objective of the
committee was to suggest ways and means for promoting tourist traffic to and in
india and also to suggest arrangements or improvements on existing arrangements
desirable for promoting international and external tourism (Seth, 2006).
 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2563

With this, the process of classification system of Indian Hotels started and the
recommendations of the same guidelines were used till 1955 when the revision of
the classification norms initiated. The committee was set up to decide the legislation
that are necessary for Indian hotel Industry keeping in view price level prevailing in
India and also to suggest suitable rate structure for the Hotel Industry. The committee
decided to accept classification system based on star rating system. The Government
of India accepted the recommendations of this committee. The committee traveled
all over India and classified 186 hotels. India adopted the point based system of
hotel classification based on level of facilities available in the Hotel (Bhatia, 2008).
In 2003 Ministry of Tourism renewed the guidelines again for hotel classification
so that Indian hotels rank high on global scale as well. However, Chopra (2006)
raised the apprehensions that these norms are haphazard since the Indian Hotels
that claim to be five stars cannot meet the international standards, as these Hotels
do not offer the level of services that the International Hotels offer. There are few
five star hotels only which rank on global scale as well, many of our five star rated
hotels do not appear anywhere on global scale. Based on the suggestions from the
industry, Ministry of Tourism recently revised the norms a in 2013 to make the
Hotel classification system more customers oriented with increased level of service.
The new guidelines provided customers with all the information about the services
offered on the hotel website. Sharma (2013) summarized views of the industry
experts that the new guidelines are of little use in evaluating hotels because of
being full of minute details. For example the requirement of hooks for curtains,
water sprays in bathrooms , blackout curtains are of little use in evaluating the
hotels. The experts also emphasized that the guidelines offer too low standards
than what the hotel brand standards offer to the customers.
The Ministry of tourism guidelines classifies hotels based on the level of the
facilities and services offered. The hotels are star categorized as one, two, three,
four and five star) hotels and heritage category hotels (heritage grand, heritage
classic and heritage basic) hotels. The inspection of the Hotels is carried out by
Hotel & Restaurant Approval & Classification Committee which inspects and
assesses the hotel on the basis of the facilities and services offered. The committee
checks the projects on the basis of the following parameters for allocating the star
category to the hotel (MOT 2013). These parameters include, location details, status
of ownership, site details, project details (size, area, facilities, energy conservation,
etc), blue Prints of all areas, proposed capital structure, skills development
initiatives (running training courses). The part two of the norms deal with the
level of services that the hotel should offer. These facilities are further classified as
guest room facilities, bath room facilities, public area facilities, facilities for disabled,
food and beverage facilities, facilities in kitchen, guest services, safety and security,
communication facility, eco friendly practices etc. However, the intention of the
Ministry to upgrade the level of service and quality of the Hotels through the new
guidelines are questioned by the Industry. There have been the cases where the
2564 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

hotels were allocated five-star ratings, but lack the basic levels of service. The
Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Association of India in its report on hotel
classification (Nath 2013) summarized the views of the hotel general managers,
tour operators and other stakeholders. The report clearly expressed dissatisfaction
with the new classification guidelines because of following issues:
• Classification being a deterrent for many hotels as tax structure of classified
is higher in some states, minimum wages higher for three, four and five
star hotels, increase in license fees.
• The marketing support as claimed by Government for classified hotels is
of no real value because the guests do not refer to these guidelines rather
they refer to the websites like trip advisor etc. Micromanagement by
Ministry in hotel operations like number of hooks hotel should have
behind bathroom door etc leave hotel executives frustrated. On the other
side, the positive side of the guidelines include, conformity to bench mark,
enforcement of laws, enforcement of energy conservation, ensuring safety
and security and providing a platform for hotel quality to guest.
• Many hotels which have been categorized as five star and five star deluxe
status lack the service standards and do not deserve such a higher star ratings.
• The Government should delegate the responsibility of hotel classification
to private bodies or hotel association who are more competent for this
complicated task.
However, the response to this criticism of Government officials is that Hotel
Classification system in India brings national and international standards. The
hotels can make statement about their services globally to consumers through this
classification process. The Hotels can set standards and be known amongst national
and global stakeholders. (Kumar 2013).

IMPACT OF ONLINE RATINGS ON THE HOTEL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

(Carter, 2015) questioned the ability of the hotel classification system to establish
the hierarchy of the hotels based on service quality is questioned. Quo’s (2013)
studyinferredthat “officially accredited stars” take a back seat in influencing the
customer decision as rating system has variable meanings across markets. The
study also indicated that the guest’s level of trust is highest for guest feedback
websites and social media web sites rather than the official rating system. The role
of the ratings by traditional classification system raises the expectations of the
guests about the hotel services. Arrifin and Maghzi( 2012) in their study on the
customer expectations of hotel industry found that there is a strong Association
between the star ratings and expectation of hotel hospitality. However, the star
rating system does not guarantee that these expectations are met automatically
and that is where the hotel review websites start playing a role.
 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2565

The research on hotel guest reviews for different category hotels by TripAdvisor
has found a place in UNTWO report. The study discusses Trip Advisor findings
that guests review the three star and four-star hotels delivering superior service
and value more positively than five star hotels. The reason for five star hotels not
getting favorable scores includes these hotels not able to exceed the guest
expectations (UNTWO 2014). This study correlates the guest ratings of hotels five
-star deluxe, five- star and four- star hotels on Trip Advisor and Expedia to establish
if these rating correlate. The reason for excluding three star, two star and one- star
hotels is that only TripAdvisor covers the ratings of these hotels, few hotels in
these categories are covered on Expedia. The following hypothesis based on the
literature is established .
Ho: The guest ratings for upscale hotels are higher than mid-scale hotels.
Ha: The guest ratings for mid-scale (e: g three and four-star hotels) are higher
than upscale hotels (e: g five star) hotels.
H0: The ratings of classified hotels on the TripAdvisor and Expedia have no
correlation.
Hb: The ratings of classified hotels on TripAdvisor and Expedia correlate.

1.2. HOTEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS OF INDIA

HRACC (Hotel and Restaurant Accreditation Committee) of Ministry of
Tourismclassifies allocates the star ratings to hotels in India. The classification
process involves evaluation of large number of documents (licenses, permits etc)
related to regulatory bodies. The inspection is carried out by the committee
constituted by HRACC which evaluates the hotels on the basis of facilities, services,
equipments, guest amenities, eco friendly practices, waste management, safety
etc. The hotels get the star ratings for five years. The inspectors evaluate the score
on these parameters and grants the star status based on how hotels scores in the
HRACC report(Ministry of Tourism, 2015).The inspectors evaluate the hotels and
award the ratings based on the following check list.
Chopra ( 2006) raised the apprehensions that these norms are haphazard since
the Indian Hotels which claim to be five stars cannot meet the international
standards as these Hotels do not offer the level of services that the International
Hotels offer. There are few five star hotels only which rank on global scale as well,
many of our five star rated hotels do not appear anywhere on global scale. The
Ministry of tourism recently revised the norms in 2013 based on suggestions
provided by the Hotel Industry to make the Hotel Industry more customers focused
with increased level of service. However (Sharma 2013) summarizing the views of
Industry experts, criticized the system as it expects much low standards than hotels
offer.
2566 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

Table 1
Check list for hotel classification system in India.
INDIAN HOTEL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
S. No Area Check List
1 General facilities Full time operation , requirement of trading licences, requirement
and services of public liability insurance, requirement of elevators, fully
serviced bedrooms, bath rooms, public areas, kitchens, floor
surfaces in clean and good shape.
2 Guest Rooms Change of bed and bath linen daily & between check in ,Bed width
for single and double beds, Matress thickness minimum 10cm ,
Minimum bedding 2 sheets , pillow & case blanket, mattress
protector & bed cover, Suites, hair dryers, safe keeping, minibar
fridge, drinking water with minimum one glass tumbler per guest,
guest linen, shelves, drawer space, wardrobe with minimum 4
cloth hangers per bedding, sufficient lighting ( 1 per bed), 5 amp
socket, bedside drawer and table, tv cable( remore for 3, 4, 5 star
hotels), a writing surface with sufficient light, chairs, waste paper
basket, opaque curtains or screening at all windows, 3 ft mirror,
stationary folder, do not disturb notice, night spread, bed cover,
energy saving lighting, linen room.
3 Bath Room Bedroom with attached bath, size of bath room, bath towel / hand
towel, bath mat, guest toiletries with soap for each guest, bath
mat, hookes for hanging clothes, sanitary bin, lid for WC, toilet
papers, non porous surfaces, bath tubs, water saving taps /
showers, energy sving devices.
4 Public Area: Lobby/ Furniture including chairs, arm chairs, sofa, table, floral display,
Lounge staff on duty in lounges.
5 Reception facility 16 hrs minimum on duty staff, 24 hrs call service, directions to
hotel, city street maps to be available.
6 Other services Valet parking services, availibility of room, F&B and other terriff,
temperature control, availibility of room terriff, rest rooms for
ladies, wash basin for running hot and cold water.
7 Facilities for Guest room, bath room, public rest rooms with user friendly
differently abled services for differently abled guests.
guests
8 Food and Beverage Availibility of restaurants and dining rooms for different star
Provision category hotels with specified hours of operation. The suggestions
on the type of restaurants are also made based on the city where
the hotels are suggested.
9 Equipment/Crockery Plastics accepted in pool area, stainless steel cutlery,
/ cutlery
10 Bar Requirement of bar licences
11 Equipment Refrigrator, storage for meat , fish and vegetables, Mixed color
chopping board, tiled surfaces, head covering for staff, germicide
for cleaning of floor, good quality cleaning vassels / utensils, food
grade equipment containers, drinking water, ventillation system,
garbage to be segregated, clean recieving areas, six monthly
medical check ups, first aid training to all staff, pest control.
12 Staff Staff uniform for front of the house, english speaking staff,
percentsge of supervisory staff in each hotel, percentage of skilled
staff, separate male female staff rooms, staff locker room, toilet
facility, separate dining areas & facilities.
contd. table 1
 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2567

S. No Area Check List

13 Safe and honourable Pledge to be displayed in multiple places, training for SHT,
tourism(SHT)
14 Guest Services Provision of wheel chair for differently abled guest, valet
parking services, dry cleaning laundry, tea/ coffee in room, iron
and board facility, paid transportation on call, shoes shining,
ice on demand, acceptance of credit cards, assistance with
luggage on request, public tel on premise, wake up call, message
for guest to be recorded and delivered, doctors contact list with
reception, stamps and mailing, news papers, travel desk,
left luggage, provision of emergency supplies, health and
fitness, beauty saloon , florists, utlity shop, money changing
facilities
15 Safety and security Metal detectors, CCTV, x-ray machines, Under belly scanners,
verification of staff and suppliers, staff trained in fire fighting,
security arrangements for all hotel entrances, bedroom doors with
peeping holes & internal securing device.
16 Communication Email, fax, internet, Business center, telephone, pc, multipurpose
facility sockets, etc

1.3. INTEGRATION OF GUEST RATINGS WITH HOTEL CLASSIFICATION

SYSTEM
In terms of improvement of business with the help of guest review, the study by (Ye
et al., 2011) showed the significant improvement in the online hotel business because
of online hotel reviews by ten percent. The impact of the social media on the hotel
booking has been tremendous. The cases of integration of hotel reviews and hotel
classification system under two options are reported. The first one is “full integration”
mode where a hotel can move up or down a star level depending upon guest
perception of its service quality. The second option of “comparative performance”
includes guest review rating displayed separately to the hotel classification without
integration. The full integration model is already in use in Norway. The integration
is achieved using a series of formulae into the formal classification. Under
comparative performance mode as in Switzerland, the guest ratings and the hotel
classification is written separately without integrating (UNTWO 2014). Hotel Review
website TrustYou allows the hotel chains to integrate the hotel reviews and raking
(TrustYou score) on their websites. Apart from hotel review websites providing the
hotel reviews, hotel chains like Marriott have started its own review and rating
process.Integrating guest review and hotel classification is recommended on account
of helping the hotels in improving services, image and revenue. (Anderson 2011).

1.4. METHODOLOGY
Many online travel agents (OTA’s) provide ratings of Indian hotels. Out of 983
officially classified hotels in India, TripAdvisor rates 595 hotels while Expedia
rates 305 hotels. The study used the guest ratings of all such listed hotels of different
2568 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

star categories from both OTA’s. Using SPSS, the statistical difference of means of
the guest ratings of all-star categorized hotels from both OTA’s was calculated.
The guest ratings of five stars deluxe, five star and four-star hotels on TripAdvisor
and Expedia were correlated (one and two star hotels are not listed on Expedia).The
descriptive statistics of the guest ratings of the hotels on TripAdvisor and Expedia
was computed using SPSS to compare their standard deviation, mean, median
and mode to compare the consistence and robustness.

Table 2
Total number of officially classified hotel in India and their presence on
hotel review sites
Hotel Star Total number Number of Number of hotels Number of hotels
Category of Hotels hotels included with ratings on with ratings on
n= for study Trip Advisor Expedia
1 35 9 17 0
2 66 29 45 12
3 490 171 218 53
4 122 94 106 48
5 147 76 98 84
5 Star Deluxe 123 87 111 108
Total 983 466 595 305

1.6. DATA ANALYSIS

Significant variation in the mean guest ratings within the different hotel star
categories was found (Sum of squares =41.61, F=30.4, Sig=0)( see table3 and 4). The
mean score of the guest ratings of all six categories of hotels (five star deluxe, five
star, four star, three star, two star and one star hotel) were found in proportion to the
star ratings of the hotel. The results therefore reject the hypothesis established from
the literature that the guest rate three star favorably as compared with five star hotels.
The five star deluxe hotels score the highest average ratings 4.33 (out of 5) while
as one star hotels scored lowest ratings of 3.08. One way Anova test used to check
the variation of means between the different star categories of the hotels indicated
significance value of “0”there by indicating a significant difference between the means
between the guest ratings of hotels of different star categories (see table 4).
The correlation between TripAdvisor and Expedia ratings for five star deluxe
hotels, five star hotels and four star hotels using SPSS was conducted(see table 5).
The Pearson correlation-two tail was used to establish the significance of the data.
The results showed the significant correlation between the guest ratings on
TripAdvisor and Expedia in all the three categories five-star deluxe hotels, five-star
hotels and four-star hotels. While as in case of five-star deluxe hotels, the correlation
r=0.70 and significance of correlation p=0 , there by suggesting a strong correlation
between the ratings . Similarly in case of five star hotels, the value r=0.537 and the
 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2569

Table 3
Descriptive statistics of hotel guest ratings
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Hotel N Mean Std. Std. Lower Upper Minimum Maximum
category Deviation Error Bound Bound
1 star 28 3.08 .673 .127 3.22 3.74 2 5
2-star 33 3.38 .638 .111 3.15 3.60 2 4
3-star 217 3.77 .580 .039 3.69 3.85 1 6
4-star 106 3.91 .571 .055 3.80 4.02 1 5
5-star 98 4.08 .354 .036 4.01 4.15 3 4
5-star 113 4.33 .382 .036 4.26 4.40 3 5
deluxe
Total 595 3.92 .584 .024 3.87 3.96 1 6

Table 4
Significance of difference of means between the different star category of hotels
ANOVA
Guest Rating Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 41.613 5 8.323 30.499 .000
Within Groups 160.725 589 .273
Total 202.338 594

significance of correlation is p=0 indicates the strong correlation and finally the results
of four star hotels r=0.599 and the significance of the correlation p=0 shows the
correlation suggesting the correlation of the four-star hotels between TripAdvisor
ratings and Expedia guest ratings. The correlation of guest ratings on TripAdvisor
and Expedia for five-star deluxe, five star and four-star hotels indicate that these
ratings are consistent and representative of the respective hotel star category. Further,
it is an indicative of robustness of TripAdvisor guest ratings for the hotels.

1.7. DISCRIPTIVE STATISTICS

The descriptive statistics of the guest ratings for five-star deluxe, five-star and
four-star hotels on TripAdvisor and Expedia (see table 6) reveal that standard
deviation of guest ratings on TripAdvisor have a low standard deviation compared
to the ratings for the hotels on Expedia and suggesting the robustness of the guest
ratings of TripAdvisor ratings.

1.8. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

These results of the study suggest that the guests rate five-star deluxe and five-
star hotels in India favorably-thus rejecting the null hypothesis that guest rate
three star hotels favorably as compared with higher star rated hotels. The results
 Table 5 2570
Correlation between TripAdvisor and Expedia guest ratings.
�

  Trip Advisor 5star Expedia 5 Star Trip Advisor Expedia TripAdvisor Expedi 4
Deluxe Guest Deluxe Guest 5Star 5 Star Four Star Star
Ratings Ratings Ratings Ratings Ratings Ratings
TripAdvisor Pearson 1 .700** 1 .537** 1 .599**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)   0   0   0
N 102 101 84 84 48 48
Expedia Pearson .700** 1 .537** 1 .599** 1
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) 0   0   0 0
N 102 101 84 84 48 48
   **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 **Correlation is significant at **Correlation is significant
Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

level (2-tailed). the 0.01 level (2-tailed). at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2571

Table 6
Comparative descriptive statistics of TripAdvisor and Expedia guest ratings
Descriptive Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Variance
TripAdvisor 5star Deluxe Guest Ratings 102 4.3480 .35031 .123
Expedia 5 Star Deluxe Guest Ratings 101 4.3495 .41295 .171
Trip Advisor 5 Star Ratings 84 4.1071 .33895 .115
Expedia 5 Star Ratings 84 4.0571 .39646 .157
Trip Advisor Four Star Ratings 48 3.9583 .35480 .126
Expedi 4 Star Ratings 48 3.8146 .56342 .317
Valid N (listwise) 48

therefore indicate the strength of five star hotels to meet the guest requirements.
The results have clearly suggestedthe five star deluxe hotels have highest mean
guest ratings compared to any other hotel star category hotel. The results however
do not indicate that it is due to the hotel classification. The better guest ratings of
these hotels can be due to the various reasons- that include branding. Almost all
of these hotel chains belong to strong International and national hotel brands. The
superior ratings of five star deluxe hotels can be result of stringent practices of
guest satisfaction, availability of superior work force, stringent training
development, ensuring close monitoring of the guest review and taking measures
for to improve the same. The results convey that the five star hotels in India are
capable of meeting the guest expectations in a better way as compared to the other
category of the hotels. Further, the official classification system of India accurately
represents the guest perceptions about the properties.
The standard operating procedures of those hotel brands are likely to be
stringent enough to ensure guest satisfaction and comfort. The award of the higher
star ratings by the agencies compliments what these hotel stand for. The impressive
presence of these hotels as compared to three- star, two-star and one-star hotel on
hotel review websites is indicative of the seriousness of higher stare rated hotels
towards social media management. It is clear that the higher star hotels pay due
attention towards good ratings on hotel rating websites. These hotels are quick to
respond to the guest feedback and ensure they improve their services for better
guest satisfaction and hence better ratings. In comparison, just a few one star two
star and three star hotels are listed by online travel agencies indicating the lack of
willingness of these hotels to be listed and improve online guest ratings by a quick
response system like higher star rated hotels.
The correlation of the guest ratings for the five star-deluxe hotels, five-star and
four-star hotels on TripAdvisor and Expedia indicates that guest ratings for these
hotels are consistent and statistically representative. The study has further indicated
strong presence of Indian hotels on TripAdvisor as compared other online travel
website. The review of literature in this study has explained how the use of social
2572 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

media has resulted in the growth of travel and hospitality industry. The traditional
means of communication with the guests through social media has created endless
opportunities for businesses to present the information and facts in the most
innovative ways. Whether it is the website, social media, and hotel and travel
review websites, there are numerous modes of communication available for
businesses. The first finding of this study-that higher the star category, better the
guest ratings is one of the most important findings. This means that those hotels
are most conscious of use of social media and they have system in place that takes
care of the guest opinion and feedback which results in excellent ratings. Down
the star category, we found that either the hotels are not covered by the hotel
review websites and do not have any presence on social media. This is obvious
that those hotels are lagging behind when it comes to social media. One, two and
three star category need to create a system where the guest feedback is recorded,
evaluated, improvements made and exceed guest expectations. This can happen
these hotels acknowledge the role of online ratings. Another important finding is
that the online travel companies have a superior mechanism of rating the hotels
compared to the official hotel classification system. The official classification
systems whether in India or anywhere else must incorporate the online ratings for
guest reference to stay relevant, a practice that started by few countries like Norway.
The study also provides an assurance to the travel planners and Industry experts
in India who have been raising their concern in the media about the five star ratings
being given to some hotels that do not deserve the five star rating. Few of those
five star hotels might not be up to the mark as expected, however the guests are
not dependant on the official classification ratings only for decision making about
hotel booking. The online ratings are becoming important source of information
for guests apart from star rating. The five star hotels that do not offer service quality
to the guests as expected, the guests do not rate those hotels favorably. However,
the hotel classification system of India at the same time needs to evolve its system
of evaluating hotels to ensure the hotels that do not offer acceptable service quality,
do not get away with top star ratings. The hotel classification system of India needs
to be benchmarked with worlds best such systems so the ratings provided by the
system are trustworthy and relevant.

References
Algesheimer, R.; S. Borle; U.M. Dholakia; and S.S. Singh. 2010. The impact of customer community
participation on customer behaviors: An empirical investigation, Marketing Science 29(4), 756-
769.
Anderson, CK. (2011) Search, OTAs, and Online Booking: An Expanded Analysis of the Billboard
Effect, Cornell Hospitality Report Vol. 11, No. 8, April 2011
Ariffin.M, AtefehMaghzi. “A preliminary study on customer expecta tions of hotel
hospitality:Influences of personal andhotel factors.” Internationa Journal of Hospitality Management
(2012): 194-195.
 Online and Offline Hotel Ratings: A Case Study of Indian Hotels � 2573

Barker, A.T., Aydin, N., (1994). Implications of standardisation in global markets. In: Hasan, S.S.,
Kaynak, E. (Eds.), Globalisation of Consumer Markets. International Business Press (Haworth
Press Inc.), New York, pp. 283}302.
Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity.
Bond R. (2003), The Rupa Book of True Tales of Mystery and Adventure,Chapter 8: In a Crystal
Ball: A Mussoorie Mystery. Rupa & Co, New Delhi.
Carter, L. (2015). Available at: http://research.shu.ac.uk/domino/index.php/HMJ/article/view/5/24 [Accessed
19 Aug. 2015].
Cherunilam, Francis (2009). International Marketing, Himalaya Publishing House, New Delhi.
Chopra.Neeti (April 2003), “Classification Norms-India V/S International”, Retrieved on 9th July
2014 from http://www.foodandhospitalityworld.com/20050627/spotlight01.shtml
Diffley, S., Kearns, J., Bennett, W., &Kawalek, P. (2011). Consumer behaviour insocial networking
sites: implications for marketers. Irish Journal Of Management, 30(2), 47-65.
Dutta, S. (2010), ‘‘What’s your personal social media strategy?’’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 88
No. 11, pp. 127-30
Emarketer.com, (2015). Social Networking Reaches Nearly One in Four Around the World - eMarketer.
[online] Available at: http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Social-Networking-Reaches-Nearly-
One-Four-Around-World/1009976 [Accessed 24 Mar. 2015].
Gretzel, U., &Yoo, K. (2008). Use and impact of online travel reviews. In P. O’Connor, W. Höpken,
& U. Gretzel (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2008 (pp. 35–46)
New York: Springer-Verlag.
Joshi. Rosy, Kapoor. Sangam 2007, Business Environment, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities
of social media. Business Horizons 53(1): 59–68.
Khosla, V. and Sathyanarayanan, D. (2014). Several foreign hotel chains like Rotana, Meininger,
Jumeirah and Six Senses eye Indian market. The Economic Times. [online] Available at: http://
articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-04-09/news/48999689_1_jumeirah-group-
kaushik-vardharajan-hvs [Accessed 10 Aug. 2014].
Levy, M. (2009), ‘‘Web 2.0 implications on knowledge management’’, Journal of Knowledge
Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 120-34.
McAfee, Andrew. ‘Enterprise 2.0 Inclusionists and deletionists’. Andrew McAfee’s Blog 2006. Web. 8
Mar. 2015.
Munar, A. and Jacobsen, J. (2014). Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media.
Tourism Management, 43, pp.46-54.
Munar, A. M., &Ooi, C.-S. (2012). The truth of the crowds: social media and the heritage experience.
In L. Smith, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), The cultural moment in tourism (pp. 255e273).
Abingdon: Routledge.
Munar, A. M. (2010). Digital exhibitionism: the age of exposure. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current
Cultural Research, 2, 401e422.
Oifc.in, (2014). Hospitality | OIFC. [online] Available at: http://www.oifc.in/hospitality [Accessed
20 Jul. 2014]
Pöyry, E.; P. Parvinen; and T. Malmivaara. 2013. Can we get from liking to buying? Behavioral
differences in hedonic and utilitarian Facebook usage, Electronic Commerce Research and
Applications 12(4), 224-235.
Quo, Global (2014). Is The Official Hotel Rating System Sinking Into The Past? - Friday, 18th October
2013 at 4Hoteliers. 4hoteliers.com. Retrieved 23 July 2014, from http://www.4hoteliers.com/
features/article/7954.
Qing, L. Z., & Liu, J. C. (1993).Assessment of the hotel rating system in China.Tourism Management,
14(6), 440-452.
 2574 � Tahir Sufi and Satinderpal Singh

Sathyanarayanan, D, 2013. More people now prefer to book their hotels via portals like Makemytrip,
Hotels.com &Goibibo. <em>The Economic Times</em>, Ma y 3rd. http://
articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-05-03/news/39009593_1_online-hotel-bookings-
makemytrip-phocuswright.
Sigala, M., Lockwood, A., & Jones, P. (2001). Strategic implementation and IT:Gaining competitive
advantage from the hotel reservations process. International Journal of Contemporary
Hospitality Management, 13(7), 364–371
Soni, A. and Mehra, A. (2014). The big picture of online travel space in India that is set to get bigger.
[online] YourStory.com. Available at: http://yourstory.com/2014/07/online-travel-india/
[Accessed 28 Mar. 2015].
Shojaee, S. and Bin Azman, A. (2013). An Evaluation of Factors Affecting Brand Awareness in the
Context of Social Media in Malaysia. ASS, 9(17).
Taj Group 2014, Company Introduction, Retrieved 9th July 2014 from http://www.tajhotels.com/
About-Taj/Company-Information/Default.html
Technopak Advisors Pvt. Ltd, (2014). Indian Hospitality Outlook. Gurgaon: Technopak Advisors Pvt.
Ltd, pp.11-13
Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual
communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153e169.
Ministry of Tourism,. Classification & Reclassification Of Hotels. Ministry of Tourism,Govt of India
2015. Available at http://tourism.nic.in/writereaddata/Uploaded/Guideline/010720150505262.pdf,
accessed on 28th November, 2015.
Munar, A. M., &Ooi, C.-S. (2012). The truth of the crowds: social media and the heritage experience.
In L. Smith, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), The cultural moment in tourism (pp. 255e273).
Abingdon: Routledge.
Munar, A. M. (2010). Digital exhibitionism: the age of exposure. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current
Cultural Research, 2, 401e422.
Pöyry, E.; P. Parvinen; and T. Malmivaara. 2013. Can we get from liking to buying? Behavioral
differences in hedonic and utilitarian Facebook usage, Electronic Commerce Research and
Applications 12(4), 224-235.
Sathyanarayanan, D, 2013. More people now prefer to book their hotels via portals like Makemytrip,
Hotels.com &Goibibo. <em>The Economic Times</em>, May 3 rd. h ttp ://
articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2 013-0 5-03 /news/390 09593 _1_online-hotel-bookin gs-
makemytrip-phocuswright.
TripAdvisor,. ‘What Is Tripadvisor’s Popularity Index?’. N.p., 2014. Web. 29 Nov. 2015.
UNTWO, (2014). Online Guest Reviews and Hotel Classification systems. An integrated approach..
Madrid, Spain: World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), pp.16-36.
Ye, Q., Law, R., Gu, B. and Chen, W. (2011). The influence of user-generated content on traveler
behavior: An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings.
Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), pp.634-639.
Zafiropoulos, C., Vrana, V. & Paschaloudis, D. (2006). The internet practices of hotel companies: an
analysis from Greece. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18(2),
156-163.
(Scott & Orlikowski 2009).
TripAdvisor, (2014). What is a rating?. [online] Available at: https://www.tripadvisorsupport.com/hc/
en-us/articles/200613867-What-is-a-rating- [Accessed 26 Jan. 2016].
Verma, M.”Foreign hotels jack up star value in India” ,Oct 23, 2009, Retrieved 9th July 2014 from
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2009-10-23/news/27643629_1_hotel-chain-premier-inn-
ajay-bakaya

View publication stats