Jurnal Internasional Microbiologi
Jurnal Internasional Microbiologi
Jurnal Internasional Microbiologi
https://www.scirp.org/journal/aim
ISSN Online: 2165-3410
ISSN Print: 2165-3402
Md. Nur Hossain1*, Annana Akter2, Sanjida Humayan1, Liton Chandra Mohanto1,
Shamima Begum2, Monzur Morshed Ahmed1
1
Institute of Food Science and Technology, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research,
Dhaka, Bangladesh
2
Department of Microbiology, Jagannath University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Keywords
Edible Media, Lactobacillus, Probiotic, Low Cost, Mass Culture
1. Introduction
A growth medium or culture medium is a solid, liquid or semi-solid designed to
support the growth of microorganisms [1]. Culture media contains all the ele-
ments that most bacteria require for growth and are not selective, so they are
used for the general cultivation and maintenance of bacteria kept in laboratory
culture collections [2]. An undefined medium (also known as a basal or complex
medium) contains a carbon source such as glucose, various salts, a source of
amino acids and nitrogen like beef and yeast extract [3] [4].
Growth media provides minimized cell damage, suitable for screening and
maximum viability of cells. The cost of media is also an important consideration.
Commercially available media are not only costly but also non-consumable [5].
Peptones are the most widely used source of nitrogen in microbial media [6].
Some are made by cooking milk or meat products (beef, pork) in acid, but most
are made by incubating milk or meat with trypsin, pepsin, or other proteolytic
enzymes to digest the protein to a mixture of amino acids, peptides, and poly-
peptides [7] [8] [9]. On the other hand, these microbial growth media are highly
demanded in developing microbiological research. The most important applica-
tion of these media is in the production of commercially available fermented
food products, especially dairy products [10] [11]. Before starting the fermenta-
tion of food products, the required microbial cells are subjected to a pre-culture
cultivation [12]. Then the organisms are separated from media and introduced
into fermentation. For this reason, the constituents of the media are very impor-
tant as, if it contains any component that is harmful to human, it may come
across the fermented food through the starter culture. Lactobacillus are often
used as probiotics, in dairy food products that are grown in mainly De Man Ro-
gosa and Sharpe Agar (MRS agar) which contains manganese sulfate and mag-
nesium sulfate. These components can cause irritation in skin, respiratory sys-
tem and in long term repeat it may cause organ damage [13].
Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that provide health benefits
when consumed [14]. Probiotics have to be alive when administered. These mi-
crobes are thought to help restore the natural balance of bacteria in the gut (in-
cluding stomach and intestines) when it has been disrupted by an illness or
treatment. But, these probiotics are not easy to produce on a large scale [1] [15].
It needs several steps in recovery stages such as centrifugation, filtration, formu-
lation, drying etc. which increase the production cost. Moreover, the viability of
bacteria is often reduced during these recovery steps [16] [17]. So, it was a little
attempt to prevent the loss of cell count.
Meanwhile, the numbers of viable micro-organisms are recommended for the
aptitude of probiotic foods and for this reason, the challenges of maintaining
viability and activity of probiotic cultures in foods to the end of shelf-life are two
important criteria that must be fulfilled to provide effective probiotic food
products for general consumption [18]. Dried concentrated probiotic cultures
are the most suitable form for inoculation into functional foods [19], given the
ease of storage, handling and transport, especially for shelf-stable functional
products. The challenges associated with the introduction and maintenance of
high numbers of viable probiotic cultures into foods include the form of the
probiotic inoculum used, process conditions, reconstitution conditions, ability
of the probiotic culture to grow and retain viability in the food environment and
maintenance of probiotic characteristics in the food product through to the time
of consumption [20] [21].
All these problems can be reduced if the probiotics are grown in human con-
sumable media [22]. This study was about to develop an edible media that can
support the growth of both probiotics and other non-fastidious bacteria at a low
cost. Probiotics, grown in this media, do not need to go through that conven-
tional method of recovery. Instead of these, viable cells with edible broth can be
directly inoculated into raw material. Moreover, this media has been formulated
with inexpensive vegetables as the source of carbohydrates and minerals and
pulses as the source of nitrogen [23].
Pulse 1 and pulse 2 are the very good source of protein (nitrogen source) and
carbohydrate (carbon source). Pluse 1 contains 32.98% carbohydrate and 33.33%
protein in dry conditions. Pulse 2 is a good source of protein, but it is also a
great source of carbohydrates [24]. It has 68.8% carbohydrate and 9.82% protein
in a dry state. These nitrogen and carbon sources were replaced with peptone,
beef extracts and glucose in chemically defined media [6].
Vegetables are a good source of minerals and vitamins need to grow bacteria.
These vegetables contain mostly protein, carbohydrate, vitamins (vitamin C,
thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate) as well as minerals such as so-
dium, potassium, magnesium, phosphorus etc. [25]. A high content of potas-
sium present in veg 2 & veg 3. Veg 1 and veg 4 provide a large amount of phos-
phorus. Veg 2 and veg 3 are a great source of sodium and so on. All these ingre-
dients are available at the local fresh market.
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Raw Material Processing
Fresh four vegetables were sliced and blanched at 85˚C for 15 minutes. The veg-
etables and pulses were then dried at 72˚C using a hot air oven. All these ingre-
dients blended with electric blender separately and sieved to get a fine powder
with diameter of 180 - 330 µm.
2.3.1. Feeding
Each mouse was served 20 gm of regular feed. The control group was served on-
ly regular feed (total 60 gm). The sample group was served (total 100 gm) regu-
lar feed mixed with 100 mg sample powder to each mice (total 500 mg). Each
gram of sample feed contained at least 8 log CFU of bacterial culture. This expe-
riment was carried out for 10 days straight. During this trial, all mice were ob-
served carefully by their locomotor behavior and physical parameters- stool,
urine, water consumption, body temperature.
Table 1.
Table 1. An estimation of the nutritional value of the ingredient used in this experiment.
that all the four Lactobacillus have more growth in edible media than that of tra-
ditional MRS media. In the edible media, L. plantarum exihited the highest
growth followed by L. ferciminis. The other two isolates showed not so different.
Pathak and Singhal [30], replaced beef extracts with germinated lentil seed
powder in MRS media. The microbial growth of L. lactis, L. casei, L. plantarum had
a positive effect on the in modified MRS media as compared to MRS [29]. The av-
erage growth of Lactobacillus in MM-2 edible media was more than 15 log CFU/ml
where the average cell density in MRS media was 12.44 log CFU/ml (Figure 1).
in bifidobacteria media was 12.48 log CFU/ml (Figure 2). Arulanantham et al.
[6] carried out a study where they used cowpea, green gram, black gram and
soya meat (processed soya bean) in different formulations for the growth of E.
coli, Bacillus sp., Klebsiella sp., Staphyllococcus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. They
found that Staphyllococcus sp. grew well in all the protein formulations and
Klebsiella sp. grew least in the protein formulations tested. They concluded that
soya meat agar (soya meat + agar) was an effective alternative culture media
source next to nutrient agar to grow bacteria.
with increasing media formulations. The specific growth rates of all four isolates
of Bifidobacterium decreased linearly as the concentration of dissolved solids
increased in the medium. The higher sugar concentration in the medium proba-
bly exerts severe osmotic stress on the bacterial cells [4] [20].
Table 2. Weight of the mice before & after feeding edible media with Lactobacillus.
R2 21.9 28.1
R3 21.8 26.3
R2 21.5 34.1
R3 22.6 33.2
R4 22.8 34.7
R5 19.1 32.5
Table 3. Cost comparison of the edible media and other commercial media.
4. Conclusion
Edible growth media are those that are used to grow probiotics and can be con-
sumed by a human with no harmful effects. Nowadays, only lactic acid bacteria
especially Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria are used as probiotics. These study
results conducted that it is possible to formulate an edible media that can be
used commercially in food processing industries for the production of probio-
tics. For example, the starter culture of Lactobacillus for yogurt should contain 6
- 7 log CFU/ml cells. But this edible media showed 11.3 - 13.26 log CFU/ml cells.
It is clear that this media is more efficient in cell growth than conventional me-
dia. Industry requires that the organism grows faster, so that production time is
reduced which is economical. Similarly, low-cost media is always pursuing to
bring down production costs. Though it has formulated with the ingredients that
are available at the cheap local market and are very reasonable in price (which
are rich in nutrients required for microbes), this media can be a good alternative
of conventional chemically defined media. Moreover, this media contains lots of
vitamins, minerals and amino acids as it formulated with grains and vegetables.
It can be added extra nutrition in food. Because of being so nutritive, a high rate
of weight gain was observed in field trials. Another positive side of this media
is—it supported the growth of not only Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria but also
gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as comparing to conventional media.
So this media can be used rather than nutrient media for laboratory purposes. It
is recommended that more research curriculum should have carried out in the
future by using other possible ingredients. Moreover, other bacteria use in food
industries and also both fastidious, non-fastidious microbes for laboratory pur-
poses should be included in further research.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this pa-
per.
References
[1] Berde, C.V. and Berde, V.B. (2015) Vegetable Waste as Alternative Microbiological
Media for Laboratory and Industry. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceuti-
cal Sciences, 4, 1488-1494.
[2] Heenan, C., Adams, M., Hosken, R. and Fleet, G. (2002) Growth Medium for Cul-
turing Probiotic Bacteria for Applications in Vegetarian Food Products. LWT-Food
Science and Technology, 35, 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.2001.0833
[3] Madigan, M.T. and Martinko, J. (2005) Brock Biology of Microorganisms. 11th Edi-
861-870. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01448.x
[18] Yerlikaya, O. (2014) Starter Cultures Used in Probiotic Dairy Product Preparation
and Popular Probiotic Dairy Drinks. Food Science and Technology, 34, 221-229.
https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.2014.0050
[19] Santivarangkna, C., Kulozik, U. and Foerst, P. (2006) Effect of Carbohydrates on the
Survival of Lactobacillus helveticus during Vacuum Drying. Letters in Applied Mi-
crobiology, 42, 271-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01835.x
[20] Ananta, E., Volkert, M. and Knorr, D. (2005) Cellular Injuries and Storage Stability
of Spray-Dried Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. International Dairy Journal, 15,
399-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.08.004
[21] Corcoran, B., Ross, R., Fitzgerald, G. and Stanton, C. (2004) Comparative Survival
of Probiotic Lactobacilli Spray-Dried in the Presence of Prebiotic Substances. Jour-
nal of Applied Microbiology, 96, 1024-1039.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02219.x
[22] Gregurek, L. (1999) Effect of Level of Starter Culture on Viability of Probiotic Bac-
teria in Yoghurts. Mljekarstvo, 49, 3-8.
[23] Ravimannan, N., Arulanantham, R., Pathmanathan, S. and Niranjan, K. (2014) Al-
ternative Culture Media for Fungal Growth Using Different Formulation of Protein
Sources. Annals of Biological Research, 5, 36-39.
[24] Annan-Prah, A., Akorli, S. and Sedofia, K. (2010) Growth and Cultural Characteris-
tics of Selected Bacteria on Cowpea Agar (Vigna unguiculata). African Journal of
Microbiology Research, 4, 2626-2628.
[25] United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (2015) Na-
tional Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 28. Washington DC.
[26] Sharma, G. (2010) Influence of Culture Media on Growth, Colony Character and
Sporulation of Fungi Isolated from Decaying Vegetable Wastes. Journal of Yeast
and Fungal Research, 1, 157-164.
[27] Narendranath, N.V. and Power, R. (2005) Relationship between pH and Medium
Dissolved Solids in Terms of Growth and Metabolism of Lactobacilli and Saccha-
romyces cerevisiae during Ethanol Production. Applied and Environmental Micro-
biology, 71, 2239-2243. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.5.2239-2243.2005
[28] Adesemoye, A. and Adedire, C. (2005) Use of Cereals as Basal Medium for the
Formulation of Alternative Culture Media for Fungi. World Journal of Microbiolo-
gy & Biotechnology, 21, 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-004-3907-4
[29] Liu, G. and Shen, J. (2004) Effects of Culture and Medium Conditions on Hydrogen
Production from Starch Using Anaerobic Bacteria. Journal of Bioscience and Bio-
engineering, 98, 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(04)00277-4
[30] Pathak, M. and Singhal, G. (2013) An Effective Growth Medium for Probiotics for
Strict Vegetarians. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental
Sciences, 13, 367-371.
[31] Savini, M., Cecchini, C., Verdenelli, M.C., Silvi, S., Orpianesi, C. and Cresci, A.
(2010) Pilot-Scale Production and Viability Analysis of Freeze-Dried Probiotic Bac-
teria Using Different Protective Agents. Nutrients, 2, 330-339.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2030330