Conservation Philosophy and Activities of The International Elephant Foundation
Conservation Philosophy and Activities of The International Elephant Foundation
Conservation Philosophy and Activities of The International Elephant Foundation
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London
2 CONSERVATION OF ELEPHANTS
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London
SHORT REPORT: INTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION 3
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London
4 CONSERVATION OF ELEPHANTS
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London
SHORT REPORT: INTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION 5
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London
6 CONSERVATION OF ELEPHANTS
children’s conservation activities. Separate are also coming together to create safe
interviews of children (n = 105) and their passage for wildlife in the conservation cor-
parents (n = 105) showed that not only ridor between India and Nepal. Bardia
were 65% of parents well informed about National Park is an important habitat
school Wildlife Clubs [i.e. they knew the because it is home to a number of threat-
names of the patrons (leaders) of the Wild- ened species, including Asian elephants,
life Clubs, how long the children had been Gharial Gavialis gangeticus, Tiger Pan-
members and what the Wildlife Clubs did] thera tigris and Indian rhinoceros Rhino-
but also there was 75% agreement between ceros unicornis. IEF partnered with the
parents and children on conservation activi- National Trust for Nature Conservation to
ties (numbers and type) performed in their support the Strengthening Community
villages and communities (E. Otali, pers. Based Anti-Poaching Units for Asian Ele-
comm., unpubl. data). A questionnaire sur- phant Conservation in the Corridor between
vey was also sent to 500 parents from 13 India and Nepal Project, which utilized the
government-funded primary schools located Endangered status of elephants to benefit
within 5 km of Kibale National Park species that otherwise would not draw large
boundary. Of the 398 responses received conservation focus. Through a collaborative
(c. 80% response rate) > 93% of the par- approach with local people, eight Commu-
ents stated that they think it is important to nity Based Anti-Poaching Units have been
protect elephants and they want their mobilized with participation from over 320
children to learn how to conserve them village youth members. Together they
(E. Otali, pers. comm., unpubl. data). remove poacher’s traps and snares, work to
combat human–elephant conflict and protect
Infrastructure challenges Human–elephant this vital habitat. Through their patrolling,
conflict is a challenge everywhere there are information sharing and outreach efforts
elephants. As economies grow and human they have projected a 75% reduction in
settlements expand so do encounters with human–wildlife conflict in the region and
elephants, including accidents involving an 80% decrease in illegal extraction of
transportation. The Siliguri–Alipur Duar resources. At the time of writing, work in
railway line in India is close to and crosses the region seeks to expand the Community
elephant migratory routes, often with Based Anti-Poaching Units to solidify gains
deadly results. Speeding trains through already made and build upon them. The
rangelands hit and kill elephants. Building multi-species protection provided by the
on the work of a study – ‘A Survey of Ele- Community Based Anti-Poaching Units is a
phant Corridors/Traditional Elephant Move- testament to the importance to the habitat
ment Paths Across Railway Tracks in as a whole of maintaining a healthy ele-
Northern West Bengal, India, to Address phant population.
the Conservation Issue of Avoidable Ele-
phant Deaths in Train Accidents’ (Roy &
Sukumar, 2017), which was funded by IEF RESEARCH
– in 2018 IEF worked with the Asian Nat- Elephant conservation does not start and
ure Conservation Foundation to support a stop in the field. Veterinary work in zoos
workshop for stakeholders including gov- and research centres, and international
ernment representatives and railway offi- meetings to bring scientists, researchers,
cials so they may work together to discuss elephant experts, zoo personnel and con-
issues and find solutions to collisions servationists together to discuss any
between trains and wildlife. advances or challenges they face, are
Conservation corridors and anti-poaching essential to increase our knowledge and
units Conservationists and communities skills.
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London
SHORT REPORT: INTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION 7
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London
8 CONSERVATION OF ELEPHANTS
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London
SHORT REPORT: INTERNATIONAL ELEPHANT FOUNDATION 9
Woburn Safari Park (UK: https://www.wob Malaysia, report. Nairobi: CITES MIKE. Available at
urnsafari.co.uk/discover/vip-experiences/ele http://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/common/prog/
mike/0601AsERSM.pdf
phantencounters). IEF’s individual donors HEDGES, S., TYSON, M. J., SITOMPUL, A. F., KINNAIRD,
hold yoga classes for conservation, birthday M., GUNARYADI, D. & ASLAN, A. (2005): Distribution,
carnivals, with IEF donations instead of status and conservation needs of Asian elephant (Ele-
presents, and school recycling drives. phas maximus) in Lampung Province, Sumatra,
Indonesia. Biological Conservation 124: 35–48.
Besides donor-initiated events, IEF raises HEDGES, S., TYSON, M. J., SITOMPUL, A. F. & HAMMATT,
funds through zoo donations, grant writing, H. (2006): Why inter-country loans will not help
social-media awareness drives, and partner- Sumatra's elephants. Zoo Biology 25: 235–246.
ships with conservation-minded companies IUCN (2018): The IUCN Red List of Threatened Spe-
who pledge a portion of profits of sales. cies. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK: Interna-
tional Union for Conservation of Nature. Available at
Over 85% of all donations go directly to http://www.iucnredlist.org
field conservation. IUCN/SSC ASIAN ELEPHANT SPECIALIST GROUP (2017):
Be it patrols and monitoring, human–ele- Asian elephant range states meeting, final report, April
phant conflict mitigation, education, habitat 18–20 2017, Jakarta, Indonesia. Gajah: Regain Foun-
dation, International Elephant Foundation, Forum Kon-
protection, policy advising or scientific servasi. Available at https://elephantconservation.org/
research, an adaptive and responsive iefImages/2018/03/AsERSM-2017_Final-Report.pdf
approach has helped IEF create impactful MILLER, L. J., LUEBKE, J. F. & MATIASEK, J. (2018):
and sustainable change on behalf of ele- Viewing African and Asian elephants at accredited
phants. Throughout its 20 year history IEF zoological institutions: conservation intent and percep-
tions of animal welfare. Zoo Biology 37: 466–477.
has made great strides and has been fortu- PONNUSAMY, V., CHACKRAPANI, P., LIM, T. W., SAABAN,
nate enough to work with passionate, com- S. & CAMPOS-ARCEIZ, A. (2016): Farmers' perceptions
mitted conservationists, mahouts, trainers, and attitudes towards government-constructed electric
veterinarians, rangers, scouts, private and fences in Peninsular Malaysia. Gajah 45: 4–11.
RIDDLE, H. S. (2007): Elephant response units (ERU).
public supporters, and zoos, all of whom Gajah 26: 47–53.
make this progress possible. IEF looks for- RIDDLE, H. S. & OO, Z. M. (2016): Asian mahout part-
ward to building larger and larger herds of nerships working for conservation. Gajah 45: 41–43.
both elephants and elephant supporters so ROSA, C. D. & COLLADO, S. (2019): Experiences in nat-
that together giant strides forward can be ure and environmental attitudes and behaviors: setting
the ground for future research. Frontiers in Psychology
made on behalf of these magnificent and 10: Art. 00763. Available at doi: https://doi.org/10.
critically important animals. 3389/fpsyg.2019.00763
ROY, M. & SUKUMAR, R. (2017): Railways and wild-
life: a case study of train-elephant collisions in north-
REFERENCES ern West Bengal, India. In Railway ecology: 157–177.
AZMI, W. & GUNARYADI, D. (2011): Current status of
Borda-de-Agua, L., Barrientos, R., Beja, P. & Pereira,
Asian elephants in Indonesia. Gajah 35: 55–61. H. (Eds). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
AZMI, W., RIDDLE, H. S., SETYABUDI, A., WIRATNO, BAS- ZONG, J.-C., LATIMER, E. M., LONG, S. Y., RICHMAN, L.
RUL, A., SUNDARDI, E., ICHSAN, D. M. & HARDI, S.
K., HEAGGANS, S. Y. & HAYWARD, G. S. (2014): Com-
(2006): Mahouts and their elephants working as Con- parative genome analysis of four elephant endothe-
servation Response Unit in Sumatra. Gajah 24: 35–38. liotropic herpesviruses, EEHV3, EEHV4, EEHV5, and
DAMERELL, P., HOWE, C. & MILNER-GUILAND, E. J. EEHV6, from cases of hemorrhagic disease or viremia.
(2013): Child-orientated environmental education influ- Journal of Virology 88: 13547–13569.
ences adult knowledge and household behaviour. Envi-
ronmental Research Letters 8(1): Art. 015016.
DUBLIN, H., DESAI, A. A., HEDGES, S., VIE , J.-C., BAM- Manuscript submitted 28 May 2018;
BARADENIYA, C. & LOPEZ, A. (2006): Elephant range revised 6 June 2019; accepted 13 June
states meeting, 24–26 January 2006, Kuala Lumpur, 2019
Int. Zoo Yb. (2019) 53: 1–9 © 2019 The Zoological Society of London