Long-Term Financial Planning and Growth
Long-Term Financial Planning and Growth
Long-Term Financial Planning and Growth
1. Time trend analysis gives a picture of changes in the company’s financial situation over time.
Comparing a firm to itself over time allows the financial manager to evaluate whether some aspects
of the firm’s operations, finances, or investment activities have changed. Peer group analysis involves
comparing the financial ratios and operating performance of a particular firm to a set of peer group
firms in the same industry or line of business. Comparing a firm to its peers allows the financial
manager to evaluate whether some aspects of the firm’s operations, finances, or investment activities
are out of line with the norm, thereby providing some guidance on appropriate actions to take to adjust
these ratios if appropriate. Both allow an investigation into what is different about a company from a
financial perspective, but neither method gives an indication of whether the difference is positive or
negative. For example, suppose a company’s current ratio is increasing over time. It could mean that
the company had been facing liquidity problems in the past and is rectifying those problems, or it
could mean the company has become less efficient in managing its current accounts. Similar
arguments could be made for a peer group comparison. A company with a current ratio lower than its
peers could be more efficient at managing its current accounts, or it could be facing liquidity problems.
Neither analysis method tells us whether a ratio is good or bad; both show that something is different,
and tell us where to look.
2. If a company is growing by opening new stores, then presumably total revenues would be rising.
Comparing total sales at two different points in time might be misleading. Same-store sales control
for this by only looking at revenues of stores open within a specific period.
3. The reason is that, ultimately, sales are the driving force behind a business. A firm’s assets, employees,
and, in fact, just about every aspect of its operations and financing exist to directly or indirectly support
sales. Put differently, a firm’s future need for things like capital assets, employees, inventory, and
financing are determined by its future sales level.
4. Two assumptions of the sustainable growth formula are that the company does not want to sell new
equity, and that financial policy is fixed. If the company raises outside equity, or increases its debt-
equity ratio, it can grow at a higher rate than the sustainable growth rate. Of course, the company could
also grow at a faster rate if its profit margin increases, if it changes its dividend policy by increasing
the retention ratio, or its total asset turnover increases.
CHAPTER 3 - 21
5. The sustainable growth rate is greater than 20 percent, because at a 20 percent growth rate the negative
EFN indicates that there is excess financing still available. If the firm is 100 percent equity financed,
then the sustainable and internal growth rates are equal and the internal growth rate would be greater
than 20 percent. However, when the firm has some debt, the internal growth rate is always less than the
sustainable growth rate, so it is ambiguous whether the internal growth rate would be greater than or
less than 20 percent. If the retention ratio is increased, the firm will have more internal funding sources
available, and it will have to take on more debt to keep the debt/equity ratio constant, so the EFN will
decline. Conversely, if the retention ratio is decreased, the EFN will rise. If the retention rate is zero,
both the internal and sustainable growth rates are zero, and the EFN will rise to the change in total
assets.
6. Common-size financial statements provide the financial manager with a ratio analysis of the company.
The common-size income statement can show, for example, that cost of goods sold as a percentage of
sales is increasing. The common-size balance sheet can show a firm’s increasing reliance on debt as a
form of financing. Common-size statements of cash flows are not calculated for a simple reason: There
is no possible denominator.
7. It would reduce the external funds needed. If the company is not operating at full capacity, it would
be able to increase sales without a commensurate increase in fixed assets.
8. ROE is a better measure of the company’s performance. ROE shows the percentage return earned on
shareholder investment. Since the goal of a company is to maximize shareholder wealth, this ratio
shows the company’s performance in achieving this goal over the period.
9. The EBITD/Assets ratio shows the company’s operating performance before interest, taxes, and
depreciation. This ratio would show how a company has controlled costs. While taxes are a cost, and
depreciation and amortization can be considered costs, they are not as easily controlled by company
management. Conversely, depreciation and amortization can be altered by accounting choices. This
ratio only uses costs directly related to operations in the numerator. As such, it gives a better metric to
measure management performance over a period than does ROA.
10. Long-term liabilities and equity are investments made by investors in the company, either in the form
of a loan or ownership. Return on investment is intended to measure the return the company earned
from these investments. Return on investment will be higher than the return on assets for a company
with current liabilities. To see this, realize that total assets must equal total debt and equity, and total
debt and equity is equal to current liabilities plus long-term liabilities plus equity. So, return on
investment could be calculated as net income divided by total assets minus current liabilities.
11. Presumably not, but, of course, if the product had been much less popular, then a similar fate would
have awaited due to lack of sales.
12. Since customers did not pay until shipment, receivables rose. The firm’s NWC, but not its cash,
increased. At the same time, costs were rising faster than cash revenues, so operating cash flow
declined. The firm’s capital spending was also rising. Thus, all three components of cash flow from
assets were negatively impacted.
13. Financing possibly could have been arranged if the company had taken quick enough action.
Sometimes it becomes apparent that help is needed only when it is too late, again emphasizing the
need for planning.
22 – SOLUTIONS MANUAL
14. All three were important, but the lack of cash or, more generally, financial resources, ultimately spelled
doom. An inadequate cash resource is usually cited as the most common cause of small business
failure.
15. Demanding cash up front, increasing prices, subcontracting production, and improving financial
resources via new owners or new sources of credit are some of the options. When orders exceed
capacity, price increases may be especially beneficial.
NOTE: All end-of-chapter problems were solved using a spreadsheet. Many problems require multiple
steps. Due to space and readability constraints, when these intermediate steps are included in this solutions
manual, rounding may appear to have occurred. However, the final answer for each problem is found
without rounding during any step in the problem.
Basic
3. This is a multi-step problem involving several ratios. The ratios given are all part of the DuPont
Identity. The only DuPont Identity ratio not given is the profit margin. If we know the profit margin,
we can find the net income since sales are given. So, we begin with the DuPont Identity:
Now that we have the profit margin, we can use this number and the given sales figure to solve for net
income:
Assuming costs and assets increase proportionally, the pro forma financial statements will look like
this:
The payout ratio is constant, so the dividends paid this year is the payout ratio from last year times net
income, or:
Dividends = ($2,700/$9,085)($10,175.20)
Dividends = $3,024
5. The maximum percentage sales increase without issuing new equity is the sustainable growth rate. To
calculate the sustainable growth rate, we first need to calculate the ROE, which is:
ROE = NI/TE
ROE = $20,066/$88,000
ROE = .2280, or 22.80%
b = 1 – .30
b = .70
6. We need to calculate the retention ratio to calculate the sustainable growth rate. The retention ratio is:
b = 1 – .20
b = .80
7. We must first calculate the ROE using the DuPont ratio to calculate the sustainable growth rate. The
ROE is:
ROE = (PM)(TAT)(EM)
ROE = (.057)(2.65)(1.60)
ROE = .2417, or 24.17%
The plowback ratio is one minus the dividend payout ratio, so:
b = 1 – .70
b = .30
CHAPTER 3 - 25
Assuming costs and assets increase proportionally, the pro forma financial statements will look like
this:
If no dividends are paid, the equity account will increase by the net income, so:
9. a. First, we need to calculate the current sales and change in sales. The current sales are next year’s
sales divided by one plus the growth rate, so:
We can now complete the current balance sheet. The current assets, fixed assets, and short-term
debt are calculated as a percentage of current sales. The long-term debt and par value of stock
are given. The plug variable is the addition to retained earnings. So:
b. We can use the equation from the text to answer this question. The assets/sales and debt/sales are
the percentages given in the problem, so:
c. The current assets, fixed assets, and short-term debt will all increase at the same percentage as
sales. The long-term debt and common stock will remain constant. The accumulated retained
earnings will increase by the addition to retained earnings for the year. We can calculate the
addition to retained earnings for the year as:
The addition to retained earnings for the year will be the net income times one minus the dividend
payout ratio, which is:
10. a. The plowback ratio is one minus the dividend payout ratio, so:
b = 1 – .25
b = .75
b. It is possible for the sustainable growth rate and the actual growth rate to differ. If any of the
actual parameters in the sustainable growth rate equation differ from those used to compute the
sustainable growth rate, the actual growth rate will differ from the sustainable growth rate. Since
the sustainable growth rate includes ROE in the calculation, this also implies that changes in the
profit margin, total asset turnover, or equity multiplier will affect the sustainable growth rate.
c. The company can increase its growth rate by doing any of the following:
Intermediate
11. The solution requires substituting two ratios into a third ratio. Rearranging D/TA:
Firm A Firm B
D/TA = .35 D/TA = .45
(TA – E)/TA = .35 (TA – E)/TA = .45
(TA/TA) – (E/TA) = .35 (TA/TA) – (E/TA) = .45
1 – (E/TA) = .35 1 – (E/TA) = .45
E/TA = .65 E/TA = .55
E = .65(TA) E = .55(TA)
Since ROE = NI/E, we can substitute the above equations into the ROE formula, which yields:
As long as both net income and sales are measured in the same currency, there is no problem; in fact,
except for some market value ratios like EPS and BVPS, none of the financial ratios discussed in the
text are measured in terms of currency. This is one reason why financial ratio analysis is widely used
in international finance to compare the business operations of firms and/or divisions across national
economic borders. The net income in dollars is:
where:
so:
b. The current assets, fixed assets, and short-term debt will all increase at the same percentage as
sales. The long-term debt and common stock will remain constant. The accumulated retained
earnings will increase by the addition to retained earnings for the year. We can calculate the
addition to retained earnings for the year as:
The addition to retained earnings for the year will be the net income times one minus the dividend
payout ratio, which is:
d. The company cannot just cut its dividends to achieve the forecast growth rate. As shown below,
even with a zero dividend policy, the EFN will still be $786,375.
The company does have several alternatives. It can increase its asset utilization and/or its profit
margin. The company could also increase the debt in its capital structure. This will decrease the
equity account, thereby increasing ROE.
14. This is a multi-step problem involving several ratios. It is often easier to look backward to determine
where to start. We need receivables turnover to find days’ sales in receivables. To calculate receivables
turnover, we need credit sales, and to find credit sales, we need total sales. Since we are given the
profit margin and net income, we can use these to calculate total sales as:
15. The solution to this problem requires a number of steps. First, remember that:
So, if we find the current assets and the total assets, we can solve for net fixed assets. Using the
numbers given for the current ratio and the current liabilities, we solve for current assets:
To find the total assets, we must first find the total debt and equity from the information given. So, we
find the net income using the profit margin:
We now use the net income figure as an input into ROE to find the total equity:
Next, we need to find the long-term debt. The long-term debt ratio is:
Substituting the total equity into the equation and solving for long-term debt gives the following:
And, with the total debt, we can find the total debt & equity, which is equal to total assets:
And finally, we are ready to solve the balance sheet identity as:
16. This problem requires you to work backward through the income statement. First, recognize that
Net income = (1 – TC)EBT. Plugging in the numbers given and solving for EBT, we get:
To get EBITD (earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation), the numerator in the cash coverage
ratio, add depreciation to EBIT. Note, since there is no amortization in this problem, EBITDA equals
EBITD.
Now, plug the numbers into the cash coverage ratio and calculate:
Rearranging, we get:
Rearranging, we get:
Next, we can multiply the preceding three factor DuPont equation by EBT/EBT, which yields:
(1) This is the company's tax burden. This is the proportion of the company's profits retained after
paying income taxes.
(2) This is the company’s interest burden. It will be 1.00 for a company with no debt or financial
leverage.
(3) This is the company’s operating profit margin. It is the operating profit before interest and taxes
per dollar of sales.
(4) This is the company’s operating efficiency as measured by dollar of sales per dollar of total assets.
(5) This is the company’s financial leverage as measured by the equity multiplier.
34 – SOLUTIONS MANUAL
The common-size balance sheet answers are found by dividing each category by total assets. For
example, the cash percentage for 2018 is:
The common-base year answers are found by dividing each category value for 2019 by the same
category value for 2018. For example, the cash common-base year number is found by:
$14,453/$11,459 = 1.2613
This means the cash balance in 2019 is 1.2613 times as large as the cash balance in 2018.
19. To determine full capacity sales, we divide the current sales by the capacity the company is currently
using, so:
20. To find the new level of fixed assets, we need to find the current percentage of fixed assets to full
capacity sales. Doing so, we find:
Next, we calculate the total dollar amount of fixed assets needed at the new sales figure.
The new fixed assets necessary is the total fixed assets at the new sales figure minus the current level
of fixed assets.
21. Assuming costs vary with sales and a 20 percent increase in sales, the pro forma income statement
will look like this:
The payout ratio is constant, so the dividends paid this year is the payout ratio from last year times
net income, or:
Dividends = ($36,224/$103,007)($125,699)
Dividends = $44,204
The new retained earnings on the pro forma balance sheet will be:
The fixed assets required at the projected sales figure is the full capacity ratio times the projected
sales level:
Note that this solution assumes that fixed assets are decreased (sold) so the company has a 100
percent fixed asset utilization. If we assume fixed assets are not sold, the answer becomes:
This is the new total debt for the company. Given that our calculation for EFN is the amount that must
be raised externally and does not increase spontaneously with sales, we need to subtract the
spontaneous increase in accounts payable. The new level of accounts payable, which is the current
accounts payable times the sales growth, will be:
This means that $13,040 of the new total debt is not raised externally. So, the debt raised externally,
which will be the EFN, is:
EFN = New total debt – (Beginning LTD + Beginning CL + Spontaneous increase in AP)
EFN = $299,773 – ($155,000 + 81,520 + 13,040) = $50,213
The pro forma balance sheet with the new long-term debt will be:
The funds raised by the debt issue can be put into an excess cash account to make the balance sheet
balance. The excess debt will be:
To make the balance sheet balance, the company will have to increase its assets. We will put this
amount in an account called excess cash, which will give us the following balance sheet:
38 – SOLUTIONS MANUAL
The excess cash has an opportunity cost that we discussed earlier. Increasing fixed assets would also
not be a good idea since the company already has enough fixed assets. A likely scenario would be the
repurchase of debt and equity in its current capital structure weights. The company’s debt-assets and
equity-assets are:
Assuming all of the debt repurchase is from long-term debt, and the equity repurchase is entirely from
the retained earnings, the final pro forma balance sheet will be:
CHAPTER 3 - 39
Challenge
24. The pro forma income statements for all three growth rates will be:
We will calculate the EFN for the 15 percent growth rate first. Assuming the payout ratio is constant,
the dividends paid will be:
Dividends = ($36,224/$103,007)($120,026)
Dividends = $42,209
The new retained earnings on the pro forma balance sheet will be:
40 – SOLUTIONS MANUAL
At a 20 percent growth rate, and assuming the payout ratio is constant, the dividends paid will be:
Dividends = ($36,224/$103,007)($125,699)
Dividends = $44,204
The new retained earnings on the pro forma balance sheet will be:
At a 25 percent growth rate, and assuming the payout ratio is constant, the dividends paid will be:
Dividends = ($36,224/$103,007)($131,372)
Dividends = $46,199
The new retained earnings on the pro forma balance sheet will be:
25. The pro forma income statements for all three growth rates will be:
At a 30 percent growth rate, and assuming the payout ratio is constant, the dividends paid will be:
Dividends = ($36,224/$103,007)($137,044)
Dividends = $48,194
The new retained earnings on the pro forma balance sheet will be:
So, the new long-term debt will be the new total debt minus the new short-term debt, or:
At a 30 percent growth rate, the firm will need funds in the amount of $4,562 in addition to the
external debt already raised. So, the EFN will be:
At a 35 percent growth rate, and assuming the payout ratio is constant, the dividends paid will be:
Dividends = ($36,224/$103,007)($142,717)
Dividends = $50,189
The new retained earnings on the pro forma balance sheet will be:
So, the new long-term debt will be the new total debt minus the new short-term debt, or:
At a 35 percent growth rate, the firm will need funds in the amount of $25,092 in addition to the
external debt already raised. So, the EFN will be:
26. We need the ROE to calculate the sustainable growth rate. The ROE is:
Now, we can use the sustainable growth rate equation to find the retention ratio as:
Payout ratio = 1 – b
Payout ratio = 1 – 1.38
Payout ratio = –.38, or –38%
This answer indicates a dividend payout ratio of negative 38 percent, which is impossible. So, the
growth rate is inconsistent with the other constraints. The lowest possible payout rate is 0 (without
46 – SOLUTIONS MANUAL
issuing stock), which corresponds to a retention ratio of 1, or total earnings retention. This problem
illustrates a key point we made in the chapter: Sustainable growth analysis forces the user to make
internally consistent assumptions.
As an aside, we should note that it is possible to have a retention ration greater than 1 if the company
issues new stock. However, since the growth rate we are evaluating is perpetual, the company would
have to issue stock every year, forever. But, doing so violates our underlying assumption that the
sustainable growth rate requires no new equity.
In this case, the maximum sustainable growth rate for this company is:
The increase in assets is the beginning assets times the growth rate, so:
Increase in assets = A g
The addition to retained earnings next year is the current net income times the retention ratio, times
one plus the growth rate, so:
And rearranging the profit margin to solve for net income, we get:
NI = PM(S)
Substituting the last three equations into the EFN equation we started with and rearranging, we get:
28. We start with the EFN equation we derived in Problem 27 and set it equal to zero:
Substituting the rearranged profit margin equation into the internal growth rate equation, we have:
Since:
ROA = NI/A
ROA = PM(S)/A
CHAPTER 3 - 47
We can substitute this into the internal growth rate equation and divide both the numerator and
denominator by A. This gives:
To derive the sustainable growth rate, we must realize that to maintain a constant D/E ratio with no
external equity financing, EFN must equal the addition to retained earnings times the D/E ratio:
Solving for g and then dividing both the numerator and denominator by A:
29. In the following derivations, the subscript “E” refers to end of period numbers, and the subscript “B”
refers to beginning of period numbers. TE is total equity and TA is total assets.
(TEE/TEE)
Recognize that the denominator is equal to beginning of period equity, that is:
(TEE – NI × b) = TEB
(TAE/TAE)
Recognize that the denominator is equal to beginning of period assets, that is:
(TAE – NI × b) = TAB
30. Since the company issued no new equity, shareholders’ equity increased by retained earnings. Retained
earnings for the year were:
ROE = $80,000/$296,000
ROE = .2703, or 27.03%
Using the equation presented in the text for the sustainable growth rate, we get:
ROE = $80,000/$260,000
ROE = .3077, or 30.77%
Using the shortened equation for the sustainable growth rate and the beginning of period ROE, we get:
Using the shortened equation for the sustainable growth rate and the end of period ROE, we get:
Using the end of period ROE in the shortened sustainable growth rate results in a growth rate that is
too low. This will always occur whenever the equity increases. If equity increases, the ROE based on
end of period equity is lower than the ROE based on the beginning of period equity. The ROE (and
sustainable growth rate) in the abbreviated equation is based on equity that did not exist when the net
income was earned.