Homogenization
Homogenization
Homogenization
Homogenized milk
Objectives of Homogenization
4. Recombining milk products: At one stage of the process, butter oil must
be emulsified in a liquid suchas reconstituted skim milk. A homogenizer,
however, is not an emulsifying machine. Therefore, the mixture should first
be pre-emulsified, for example, by vigorous stirring; the formed coarse
emulsion is subsequently homogenized (Walstra et al., 2006).
Homogenizer
Homogenization theories
The cavitation theory, on the other hand, claims that the shock waves
created when the steam bubbles implode disrupt the fat droplets. According
to this theory, homogenization takes place when the liquid is leaving the
gap, so the back pressure which is important to control the cavitation is
important to homogenization. This has also been shown in practice.
However, it is possible to homogenize without cavitation, but it is less
efficient (Bylund, 2003).
In general, the homogenizer is placed upstream, i.e. before the final heating
section in a heat exchanger. In production of UHT milk, the homogenizer is
generally placed upstream in indirect systems but always downstream in
direct systems, i.e. on the aseptic side after UHT treatment. In the latter
case, the homogenizer is of aseptic design with special piston seals, sterile
steam condenser and special aseptic dampers.
Partial homogenization
Partial stream homogenization means that the main body of skim milk is not
homogenized, but only the cream together with a small proportion of skim
milk. This form of homogenization is mainly applied to pasteurised market
milk. The basic reason is to reduce operating costs. Total power
consumption is cut by some 80% because of the smaller volume passing
through the homogenizer (Bylund, 2003).
Effect of homogenization
The effect of homogenization on the physical structure of milk has many
advantages:
Homogenization efficiency
Procedure
Calculation
Where,
Farrall Index
The homogenization efficiency of milk also analysed using the Farrall index
method as outlined by Trout (1950). It is a microscopic method. A Farrall
index ranging from 5 to 7 implied “excellent” homogenization efficiency.
Index exceeding 10 indicates inefficient homogenization (Patel, 1999).
References