Paper Information:: Mouse X, in Meta-Narrative To Demonstrate The Nuances of Determinism and How Film Adequately
Paper Information:: Mouse X, in Meta-Narrative To Demonstrate The Nuances of Determinism and How Film Adequately
Paper Information:: Mouse X, in Meta-Narrative To Demonstrate The Nuances of Determinism and How Film Adequately
Paper Information:
Film and Determinism: What Does Our Entertainment Say About Us?
37th Annual Southwest American/Popular Culture Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Abstract:
The human psyche seems compelled to debate the nature of our freedom. This debate has been
primarily focussed on attempting to discover whether free will or determinism is the driving
force behind how our lives unfold. Arguments regarding these two concepts have caused rifts to
form in both religious traditions as well as in socio-political orders. As such, the aim of this
paper will be to seek out the underlying factors at play in this issue. In order to make such an
analysis, I rely on film and its representation of modern culture. How can any art form, let alone
film, respond to the debate of free will versus determinism? In my endeavour to address this
question, and the debate as a whole, I seek to employ film theory as well as existentialist
philosophy.
Characters in film appear to have some elements of free will; if their roles were determined then
the spectators could quickly grow bored with predictable story arcs. However, I argue that by the
very virtue that these characters are contained within a set frame of time implies a societal view
that favours determinism. For the phenomenological account, I use Jean-Paul Sartre and his
argument regarding original choice to further defend this idea. I will also use short films, such as
Mouse X, in meta-narrative to demonstrate the nuances of determinism and how film adequately
relays these to audience members.
This paper will be situated within the larger framework of the philosophy of time, as the debate
between free will and determinism is grounded in an understanding of the future. As such, the
paper will seek to address arguments surrounding the nature of time itself. Many have sought to
answer how it is possible to have such a thing as time. For some, time is merely a human
invention created so we can understand our fleeting existence. So, ultimately, do we have any
control over our own lives, or is everything that will ever be somehow already situated in time? I
believe it is possible to adequately address each of these questions, and many more, through a
critical analysis of how we choose to construct our entertainment.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. “Being and Doing: Freedom” in Being and Nothingness. Translated by Hazel
E. Barnes. Toronto: Washington Square Press, 1984. pp. 559-711.
Wartenberg, Thomas E. “Film as Philosophy” in The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and
Film. Edited by Paisley Livingston and Carl Plantinga. New York: Routledge, 2011.
pp.549-559.