Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 50 views

    Geroche vs. Department of Energy G.R. No. 159796, July 17, 2007 Facts

    Uploaded by

    maica_prudente
    The Supreme Court ruled that the Universal Charge imposed under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act is not a tax, but an exaction under the state's police power. The charge is primarily intended to regulate the electric power industry, not generate revenue, by funding government debts related to electricity, missionary electrification, subsidies, and environmental costs. The charge also supports a special trust fund to ensure the viability and stability of the country's electric power system, which falls under the state's authority to protect public welfare using police powers rather than taxation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Geroche vs. Department of Energy G.R. No. 159796, July 17, 2007 Facts

    Uploaded by

    maica_prudente
    50 views1 page
    The Supreme Court ruled that the Universal Charge imposed under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act is not a tax, but an exaction under the state's police power. The charge is primarily intended to regulate the electric power industry, not generate revenue, by funding government debts related to electricity, missionary electrification, subsidies, and environmental costs. The charge also supports a special trust fund to ensure the viability and stability of the country's electric power system, which falls under the state's authority to protect public welfare using police powers rather than taxation.

    Original Title

    (042) Geroche v. DOF

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Supreme Court ruled that the Universal Charge imposed under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act is not a tax, but an exaction under the state's police power. The charge is primarily intended to regulate the electric power industry, not generate revenue, by funding government debts related to electricity, missionary electrification, subsidies, and environmental costs. The charge also supports a special trust fund to ensure the viability and stability of the country's electric power system, which falls under the state's authority to protect public welfare using police powers rather than taxation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    50 views1 page

    Geroche vs. Department of Energy G.R. No. 159796, July 17, 2007 Facts

    Uploaded by

    maica_prudente
    The Supreme Court ruled that the Universal Charge imposed under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act is not a tax, but an exaction under the state's police power. The charge is primarily intended to regulate the electric power industry, not generate revenue, by funding government debts related to electricity, missionary electrification, subsidies, and environmental costs. The charge also supports a special trust fund to ensure the viability and stability of the country's electric power system, which falls under the state's authority to protect public welfare using police powers rather than taxation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    (042) Geroche vs.

    Department of Energy
    G.R. No. 159796, July 17, 2007

    FACTS:
    On June 8, 2001 Congress enacted RA 9136 or the Electric Power Industry Act (EPIRA) of 2001. Section 34 provides for the
    imposition of a “Universal Charge” to all electricity end users after a period of (1) one year after the effectively of the EPIRA Law. The
    universal charge to be collected would serve as payment for government debts, missionary electrification, equalization of taxes and
    royalties applied to renewable energy and imported energy, environmental charge and for a charge to account for all forms of cross
    subsidies for a period not exceeding three years. The universal charge shall be collected by the ERC on a monthly basis from all end
    users and will then be managed by the PSALM Corp. through the creation of a special trust fund. Petitioners contend that the
    Universal Charge has the characteristics of a tax and is collected to fund the operations of the NPC. Petitioner posits that the
    universal charge is not for a regulatory purpose.

    ISSUE:
    Whether or not, the Universal Charge imposed under Sec. 34 of the EPIRA is a tax.

    HELD:
    No. It can be gleaned from the mentioned purposes under the EPIRA Law that the assailed Universal Charge is not a tax, but
    an exaction in the exercise of the State's police power. Public welfare is surely promoted.

    The conservative and pivotal distinction between the power to tax and police power rest in the purpose for which the
    charge is made. If generation of revenue is the primary purpose and regulation is merely incidental, the imposition is a tax; but if
    regulation is the primary purpose, the fact that revenue is incidentally raised does not make the imposition a tax.

    Evidently, the establishment and maintenance of the Special Trust Fund, under the last paragraph of Section 34, R.A. No.
    9136, is well within the pervasive and non-waivable power and responsibility of the government to secure the physical and
    economic survival and well-being of the community, that comprehensive sovereign authority we designate as the police power of
    the State.

    This feature of the Universal Charge further boosts the position that the same is an exaction imposed primarily in pursuit of
    the State's police objectives. The STF reasonably serves and assures the attainment and perpetuity of the purposes for which the
    Universal Charge is imposed, i.e., to ensure the viability of the country's electric power industry.

    You might also like