International Payments Assignment
International Payments Assignment
International Payments Assignment
Key Points :
Cash-in-Advance :
With cash-in-advance payment terms, the exporter can avoid credit risk because
payment is received before the ownership of the goods is transferred. Wire
transfers and credit cards are the most commonly used cash-in-advance options
available to exporters. However, requiring payment in advance is the least
attractive option for the buyer, because it creates cash-flow problems. Foreign
buyers are also concerned that the goods may not be sent if payment is made in
advance. Thus, exporters who insist on this payment method as their sole manner
of doing business may lose to competitors who offer more attractive payment
terms.
Pros
Cons
Key Points :
Full or significant partial payment is required, usually via credit card or bank
or wire transfer or escrow service, before the ownership of the goods is
transferred.
Cash-in-advance, especially a wire transfer, is the most secure and least
risky method of international trading for exporters and, consequently, the
least secure and an unattractive method for importers. However, both the
credit risk and the competitive landscape must be considered.
Exporters may select credit cards as a viable cash- in-advance option,
especially for small consumer goods transactions.
Exporters may also select escrow services as a mutually beneficial cash-in-
advance option for small transactions with importers who demand assurance
that the goods will be sent in exchange for advance payment.
Insisting on cash-in-advance could, ultimately, cause exporters to lose
customers to competitors who are willing offer more favorable payment
terms to foreign buyers.
Creditworthy foreign buyers, who prefer greater security and better cash
utilization, may find cash-in-advance unacceptable and simply walk away
from the deal.
Characteristics of Cash-in-Advance :
Letters of Credit :
“A letter of credit adds a bank's promise to pay the exporter to that of the foreign
buyer provided that the exporter has complied with all the terms and conditions of
the letter of credit. The foreign buyer applies for issuance of a letter of credit from
the buyer's bank to the exporter's bank and therefore is called the applicant; the
exporter is called the beneficiary”.
There are Two Basic Forms of letters of credit: Standby and Documentary.
Documentary Letters Of Credit can be either Revocable or Irrevocable, although
the first is extremely rare. Irrevocable Letters Of Credit can be Confirmed or Not
Confirmed. Each type of credit has advantages and disadvantages for the buyer and
for the seller, which this information will review below. Charges for each type will
also vary. However, the more the banks assume risk by guaranteeing payment, the
more they will charge for providing the service.
Applicant: The party applying for the letter of credit, usually the importer in
a grain transaction.
The Issuing Bank: The bank that issues the letter of credit and assumes the
obligation to make payment to the beneficiary, usually the exporter.
Beneficiary: The party in whose favor the letter of credit is issued, usually
the exporter in a grain transaction.
Amount: The sum of money, usually expressed as a maximum amount, of
the credit defined in a specific currency.
Terms: The requirements, including documents that must be met for the
collection of the credit.3
3
Halsbury's Laws of England, 4th Edn., Vol. 3, p. 99, Para. 131.
Information to be provided in the Letter of Credit by the paties :
Once the exporter and importer have concluded a transaction that calls for payment
under some form of letter of credit, the importer makes application for the credit to
the bank, either locally or in another country that will issue the credit. The
importer/applicant will give the issuing bank instructions that cover such items as:
Facts: The suit has been brought by M/s. Tarapore & Co., Madras (hereinafter
referred to as the (“Indian firm”). That firm had taken up on contract the work of
excavation of a canal as a part of the Farakka Barrage Project. In that connection
4
AIR 1970 SC 891.
they entered into a contract with M/s. V/O Tractoro export, Moscow (which will
hereinafter be referred to as the “Russian firm”), for the supply of construction
machinery such as scrapers and bulldozers. In pursuance of that contract, the
Indian firm opened a confirmed, irrevocable and divisible Letter Of Credit with the
Bank of India Ltd., for the entire value of the equipment, i.e., Rs. 66,09,372, in
favour of the Russian firm negotiable through the bank for foreign trade of the
U.S.S.R., Moscow. Under the said Letter Of Credit the Bank of India was required
to pay to the Russian firm on production of the documents particularised in the
Letter Of Credit along with the drafts. One of the conditions of the Letter Of Credit
was that 25 per cent, of the amount should be paid on the presentation of the
specified documents and the balance of 75 per cent, to be paid one year from the
date of the first payment. The agreement entered into between the Bank of India
and the Russian firm under the Letter Of Credit.
Decision: The parties shall continue to be bound by the original contract subject to
the extension of the time granted under the Delhi agreement for the payment of the
price and thus, the appeal was allowed.
In Urquhart Lindsay and Co. Ltd. v. Eastern Bank Ltd 5, the King’s Bench held
that the refusal of the defendants bank to take and pay for the particular bills on
presentation of the proper documents constituted a repudiation of the contract as a
whole and that the plaintiffs were entitled to damages arising from such a breach. It
may be noted that in that case the price quoted in the invoices was objected to by
the buyer and he had notified his objection to the bank. But under the terms of the
Letter of Credit the bank was required to make payments on the basis of the
invoices tendered by the seller. The court held that if the buyers had an enforceable
5
[1922] 1 K. B. 318.
claim that adjustment must be made by way of refund by the seller and not by way
of retention by the buyer.
Documentary Collections :
A documentary collection (D/C) is a transaction whereby the exporter entrusts the
collection of a payment to the remitting bank (exporter’s bank), which sends
documents to a collecting bank (importer’s bank), along with instructions for
payment. Funds are received from the importer and remitted to the exporter
through the banks involved in the collection in exchange for those documents.
D/Cs involve using a draft that requires the importer to pay the face amount either
at sight (document against payment) or on a specified date (document against
acceptance). The draft gives instructions that specify the documents required for
the transfer of title to the goods. Although banks do act as facilitators for their
clients, D/Cs offer no verification process and limited recourse in the event of non-
payment. Drafts are generally less expensive than LCs.
Open Account :
An open account transaction is a sale where the goods are shipped and delivered
before payment is due, which is usually in 30 to 90 days. Obviously, this option is
the most advantageous option to the importer in terms of cash flow and cost, but it
is consequently the highest risk option for an exporter. Because of intense
competition in export markets, foreign buyers often press exporters for open
account terms since the extension of credit by the seller to the buyer is more
common abroad. Therefore, exporters who are reluctant to extend credit may lose a
sale to their competitors. However, the exporter can offer competitive open
account terms while substantially mitigating the risk of non-payment by using of
one or more of the appropriate trade finance techniques, such as export credit
insurance.
Conclusion
In this project I have dealt with the International Payment methods. In which I
studied that there are different types of risk in payment systems depends on their
stage of development. The main concern of this research work is to give a detail
information about International Payment systems along with risk. However the
recognition of payment system risk has been Universal. We have done a detailed
study on two types of payment method (i) Cash-in-Advance & (ii) Letters of
Credit.
In Cash-in-Advance methods, we have covered its pro & cons including its
keynotes followed by its characteristics. Therefore in Letters of Credit we have
covered its types, component and with some important cases.