Diversity Experience Essay CJernigan
Diversity Experience Essay CJernigan
Diversity Experience Essay CJernigan
Cameron Jernigan
identities, there is one that is most salient to me when I think about the privileges I benefit from
on a daily basis. That identity is being a man. In the patriarchal society we live in, I am
constantly reminded of the privilege that comes with holding this identity. According to Sensoy
and DiAngelo, power is defined as “the ideological, technical, and discursive elements by which
those in authority impose their interests and ideas on everyone” (p. 73, 2017). All it takes is a
little bit of observation of society to see that men hold the lion’s share of societal power, if not
all. As a man, a feminist, and a student affairs professional, I feel it is my duty to work against
this. I hold a certain level of power and privilege, regardless of my marginalized identities (such
as being Black) that allow me to push to create change in a way that someone who is not male
cannot. Because of this, I have no choice but to do so. For this reason, I chose to attend an
cultural event sponsored by and focused on women. I chose to attend the Vagina Monologues,
Off-Off-Broadway in 1996 at the HERE Arts Center in New York City. The play features
personal monologues focused on many different topics surrounding the female experience.
Topics of monologues include: body image, masturbation, love, reproductive health and justice,
sexuality, sexual assault, as well as a host of other topics. A common theme among all the
monologues is the personification of the vagina and as the vagina as a tool of female
empowerment. Originally performed solely by Eve Ensler, the play is now performed by a
diverse collection of women worldwide. Many colleges and universities also perform their own
versions of the play every year. I chose to attend the event because I had heard that it was a great
DIVERSITY EXPERIENCE ESSAY 2
play and that it was a very empowering and affirming space. Many people recounted attending
the Vagina Monologues as the impetus for them becoming feminists, so I figured it had to be a
great experience. Prior to attending the event, I was somewhat familiar with The Vagina
Monologues. I had learned a bit about them while I was an undergraduate student, but had never
attended a performance, nor had I read or watched any of the monologues online. Most of what I
knew about the monologues came from things friends more familiar with them had told me, or
critiques I had heard from feminist scholars I had read over the years. So, while I had somewhat
of an abstract idea of what to expect, I came into the experience largely unfamiliar with the
specifics of it.
I will say that I definitely came into the experience with a bit of negative bias towards the
play, primarily for one reason. Although I had not attended a performance prior, I made the
assumption that it was not very inclusive of trans women and their experiences. Vaccaro (2012)
notes that “research suggests that heterosexism, genderism, homophobia, and transphobia are a
reality on contemporary college campuses” (p. 430). In some cases, this can play out in the
action of excluding trans women from events, programs, and organizations designed specifically
for women. Given the fact the play seemed very body-centric (given the title and what I had
heard about the play prior), I guessed that the play spoke to a specific idea of what womanhood
is, and that not all who identified as women would be able to take part or see themselves in the
play. Hammers (2006) notes “there are two different, but interrelated concerns raised by the
VM's emphasis on the vagina as the source or site of quintessential female experience(s). First,
there is the concern mentioned above, that this emphasis does lend itself to a reductive view of
female identity-one that, for instance, would arguably exclude transgendered individuals who
DIVERSITY EXPERIENCE ESSAY 3
might identify as female regardless of anatomical sex” (p. 235). Prior to the event, I decided to
do a bit of research to see if there had been any controversy surrounding this. Not to my surprise,
I found that there was, and that several colleges and universities had created monologues that
were more inclusive and affirming, and spoke more to the fluidity of gender.
Overall, while I did come in to the experience with this concern, I still was very excited
about attending and believed I would enjoy it. Aside from that concern, I had heard nothing but
glowing reviews from those that had attended. Additionally, if something empowering women
has been celebrated by women across the world over several decades, I am pretty sure that I as a
man do not have a place to dispute the validity of their opinions on its artistic merit.
Once I got to the event, I was surprised for many reasons. A preconceived notion I
definitely held without realizing until I was in attendance was the idea that both the Women
Student Union and The Vagina Monologue performers would be comprised of mostly white
women. I held the same preconceived notion about those in attendance. I did not expect to see as
diverse of a group of women as performers, members of the Women Student Union, or attendees
as I did. This notion was probably influenced by the fact all of my friends who have been
involved with the play, on several campuses in several states, were white women. As a result, I
assumed that that was the norm, and would perpetuate itself at a predominantly white institution
like Florida State University. Additionally, I am aware of how many feminist spaces, both within
predominantly white campus contexts and in greater society, are not always the most inclusive of
women of color. This also painted my preconceived beliefs about the event.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed the event. The performances were great, and many of the
monologues incorporated dance, spoken word, and music, which I did not expect at all. Many of
DIVERSITY EXPERIENCE ESSAY 4
the performers were women of color, were queer, and came from a wide range of backgrounds
and life experiences. I was happy to see that my preconceived idea about the types of women
who would be involved was wrong all along. I was disappointed, but not surprised, at how few
men (or rather, humans who I read as men) were in attendance; I was one of three.
Throughout the event, I continued thinking about the role of men in fighting oppression
of women. Yes, we can take the first step in educating ourselves and other men about sexism,
take up less room in spaces, and use the power we hold to help women enter spaces they
typically are barred from. But I struggle a lot with knowing when I am successfully using my
privilege to educate, or when I am taking up space that a probably more qualified woman could
be in to speak her own truth. Men spend so much time within society speaking for and over
women. There’s a fine line between being an ally and speaking up for women in a space they do
not typically occupy, and using that action to continue occupying that space when a woman
could be there. I think that is why events, works, and spaces like the Vagina Monologues are so
important. Dedicated spaces for women to speak about their experiences, without the intrusion of
men or the male gaze, is so important. Ropers-Huilman et al. (2016) note that “in our research,
we found that women college students often felt monitored in classes, with friends and faculty, in
recreational settings, and at social and extracurricular events” (p. 117). While dedicated spaces
for women college students to express themselves will not solve the potentially negative impact
These thoughts continued into the discussion portion of the assignment. After the event
ended, I talked with Daralene, a Women Student Union member in attendance. I mentioned to
her my pre-event concerns about trans women and how the Vagina Monologues may not be the
DIVERSITY EXPERIENCE ESSAY 5
most inclusive in 2019. I also admitted that it felt a bit weird to say that to a woman as a man.
She admitted that my concern was very valid and that that was a very real concern when it came
to the performance. We also talked about how diverse in race, sexuality, and background the cast
was and how that is not always the case. Additionally, we also discussed the necessity of spaces
like these. 1, for educating others on the concerns and experiences of women, and 2, to simply
have a space for women to speak their truth. Our conversation showed me that I was not off in
When thinking about how this event has impacted me as a student affairs professional,
my first reaction is that my current role has left me a bit stagnant. In an office where I am one of
2 men on staff (both professional and student staff), where women hold all of the leadership
positions, I realize that I sometimes forget this is not the norm outside of the walls of my office.
Because of this, I think that I am realizing that I need to take a more active role in working to
combat sexism in spaces I enter where women are not the majority and do not hold power. It is
not enough to simply highlight my office as a beacon of anti-sexist student affairs practice. If I
am seriously committed to combating sexism, then I need to be intentional about the spaces I
References
Hammers, M. L. (2006). Talking about “down there”: The politics of publicizing the female
body through The Vagina Monologues. Women's Studies in Communication, 29( 2), 220-243.
Ropers-Huilman, R., Winters, K. T., & Hakkola, L. (2016). Embodied minds: College women’s
experience and the panopticon of higher education. NASPA Journal About Women in
Sensoy, O., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts
Vaccaro, A. (2012). Campus microclimates for LGBT faculty, staff, and students: An
exploration of the intersections of social identity and campus roles. Journal of Student