Subject Code Subject Title Credit Value Level Pre-Requisite / Co-Requisite/ Exclusion Objectives

Subject Code ENGL4017
Subject Title Critical Language and Cultural Studies
Credit Value 3
Level 4
Pre-requisite / None
Co-requisite/
Exclusion
Objectives The subject introduces students to the critical analysis of discourse.

In the course students identify and analyse the core cultural
meanings in contemporary social life through the linguistic
resources found in a range of texts. It enables students to reflect, and
critically appreciate the meanings constructed through a range of
genres. In this subject students examine, analyse and discuss a range
of genres including educational, political, workplace and media
texts.
Discourse will be analysed in order to understand the cultural

assumptions embedded within the text. As stated by Fairclough (1992,
p. 7), this subject will investigate:
How language conventions and language practices are invested with

power relations and processes which people are often unaware of. It
criticizes mainstream language study for taking conventions and practices
at face value as objects to be described, in a way with obscures their
political ideological investment.
The skills and knowledge gained by the students will be applicable

to other subjects and areas studied and to the student’s future
profession.
Intended Upon completion of the subject, students will be able to:

Learning
Outcomes Category A: Professional/academic knowledge and skills
a. display the necessary critical analytical skills to undertake a
robust analysis of authentic discourse, both spoken and
written, derived primarily from professional settings.
b. critically reflect on, discuss and understand the explicit and
implicit socio-cultural meanings in a range of texts.
c. integrate and synthesise ideas and approaches studied.
d. reflect, generalize, summarise and present the analysis they
undertake.
Category B: Attributes for all-roundedness
e. develop a greater appreciation and understanding of
leadership, and national and social responsibility.
- 230 -
f. apply the subject knowledge and generic skills learned in this
subject to other subjects on the programme.
g. apply the knowledge gained to their future chosen professions
in terms of justifying their understanding of discourse and
creating their own discourses.
Subject 1. The relationship between language and culture

Synopsis/ 2. The tools of critical discourse analysis
Indicative 3. Methods of data collection for critical discourse analysis
Syllabus 4. Language and minority groups (including issues of sexuality,
ethnicity, social status, etc.*)
5. Conflict and peace: The language of colonial withdrawal
6. Conflict and peace: The language of war and peace
* In point 4 above, although some reference may be made to gender, for

a more detailed study of gender students should consider the elective
ENGL4018 Language and Gender.
Teaching/ The subject will be taught through a variety of modes including

Learning interactive workshops, seminars and web-based activities. The overall
Methodology approach, which is in keeping with the fundamental principle of critical
discourse analysis, is data-oriented. In the course we will focus on issues
which are related to current affairs and socio-cultural factors from a
Hong Kong and South East Asian perspective.
Assessment Specific % Intended subject learning outcomes

Methods in assessment weighting to be assessed (Please tick as
Alignment methods/tasks appropriate)
with Intended
Learning a b c d e f G
Outcomes
1. The Tools of 20%
Critical
     
Discourse
Analysis
2. Analysing the 40%

Discourse or
      
Peace and/or
Conflict
3. Life Voice 40%       
Total 100 %
The subject is assessed entirely through coursework. The assignments

total 3,500 words and are made up of three separate assignments.
Students are assessed in terms of both subject knowledge and generic
skills.
- 231 -
Each assignment requires the critical application of a discourse analysis
approach/concept to authentic professional discourse(s). Students are
expected to evaluate both the method(s) and their findings and/or
meaningfully synthesise their ideas.
Student Study Class contact:

Effort
Expected  Lectures 26 Hrs.
 Seminars 13 Hrs.
Other student study effort:
 Private study 58 Hrs.
 Take-home assignments 29 Hrs.
Total student study effort 126 Hrs.
Reading List Caldas-Coulthard, C. & Iedema, R. (eds) 2008. Identity Trouble:

and References Critical Discourse and Contested Identities. London: Palgrave
Macmillan
Cameron, D. (2007). The myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and
women really speak different languages. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Chen, K-H., Kuo, H-L., Hang, H., & Hsu, M-C. (Eds.) (1998).
Trajectories: Inter-Asia Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2001). The Discourse of New Labour: Critical
Discourse Analysis. In Wetherall, M., Taylor, S. & Yates, S.J.
(eds.) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Milton Keynes:
Sage. 229-266.
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Rhetorical strategies and identity politics in the
discourse of colonial withdrawal. Journal of Language and
Politics, 1/1, 149-180.
Flowerdew, J., Li, D.C.S., & Tran, S. (2002). Discriminatory news
discourse: Some Hong Kong data. Discourse and Society, 13/3,
319-345.
Holmes. J. (2006). Gendered Talk at Work. London: Blackwell
Martin, J. R. & White, P. P. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation:
Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave
Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning
beyond the clause. London: Continuum
Niblock, S. (2003). Television reporting of the Iraq war: Reflexivity or
ratings? Visual Communication (Review), 375-377.
Reisigil, M, & Wodak, R. (1999). Discourse and Discrimination:
Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Smart, B. (1999). Resisting McDonaldization. London: Sage.
Wettherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S.J. (2001). (Eds.), Discourse as
- 232 -
Data: A Guide for Analysis. (pp. 189-228). London: Sage
Publications.
Useful Journals and Websites

Journal of Language and Identity
Discourse and Society
Journal of Language and Politics
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/middle_east/03/story_of_the_war/h
tml/20.stm
http://www.cnn.com/video/
Prepared by Gail Forey, June 2014
- 233 -

Subject Code Subject Title Credit Value Level Pre-Requisite / Co-Requisite/ Exclusion Objectives

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Subject Code Subject Title Credit Value Level Pre-Requisite / Co-Requisite/ Exclusion Objectives

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Subject Code Subject Title Credit Value Level Pre-Requisite / Co-Requisite/ Exclusion Objectives

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Subject Code ENGL4017

Subject Title Critical Language and Cultural Studies

Objectives The subject introduces students to the critical analysis of discourse.

Discourse will be analysed in order to understand the cultural

How language conventions and language practices are invested with

The skills and knowledge gained by the students will be applicable

Intended Upon completion of the subject, students will be able to:

Subject 1. The relationship between language and culture

* In point 4 above, although some reference may be made to gender, for

Teaching/ The subject will be taught through a variety of modes including

Assessment Specific % Intended subject learning outcomes

2. Analysing the 40%

3. Life Voice 40%       

The subject is assessed entirely through coursework. The assignments

Student Study Class contact:

Other student study effort:

 Private study 58 Hrs.

 Take-home assignments 29 Hrs.

Total student study effort 126 Hrs.

Reading List Caldas-Coulthard, C. & Iedema, R. (eds) 2008. Identity Trouble:

Useful Journals and Websites

Prepared by Gail Forey, June 2014

You might also like