CYB-610 Embedded OS Presentation Scoring Guide: Performance Level Ratings

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

CYB-610 Embedded OS Presentation Scoring Guide

Performance Level Ratings


Meets Expectations Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times
possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical
goals were met.
Near Expectations Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one
or more essential areas of the assignment criteria, one or more of the most critical goals were not
met.
Below Expectations Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of the assignment criteria,
reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one
or more important areas.

Criteria Below Near Meets Earned


Expectations Expectations Expectations

The students clearly describes the tools used 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
by hackers to penetrate the specified devices
and the effects of each penetration type.
The student provides insight as to how 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
embedded operating system vendors provide
defenses against hacking attempts.
The students describes, in steps, at least one 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
strategy used to attack embedded operating
systems.
The students describes, in steps, at least one 0 pts – 2 pts 3 pts – 4 pts 5 pts
strategy to defend against the chosen attack.
The student clearly explains innovative ideas 0 pts – 2 pts 3 pts – 4 pts 5 pts
to secure devices which host the programs.
Industry standard technical writing is correct 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
and utilized throughout.
TOTAL /50
Instructor Feedback

© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

You might also like