This document summarizes a court case regarding the nullification of two marriages between Juanita Sison and Te Lay Li. The court found that Juanita's consent to marry was obtained through force and intimidation by her father. Juanita refused to marry Te Lay Li and her father beat her and threatened her with a knife to force her consent. The lower court declared the marriages null and void due to the intimidation. The decision was affirmed on appeal, with the amount owed to Juanita modified to P1,248 instead of P1,200.
This document summarizes a court case regarding the nullification of two marriages between Juanita Sison and Te Lay Li. The court found that Juanita's consent to marry was obtained through force and intimidation by her father. Juanita refused to marry Te Lay Li and her father beat her and threatened her with a knife to force her consent. The lower court declared the marriages null and void due to the intimidation. The decision was affirmed on appeal, with the amount owed to Juanita modified to P1,248 instead of P1,200.
This document summarizes a court case regarding the nullification of two marriages between Juanita Sison and Te Lay Li. The court found that Juanita's consent to marry was obtained through force and intimidation by her father. Juanita refused to marry Te Lay Li and her father beat her and threatened her with a knife to force her consent. The lower court declared the marriages null and void due to the intimidation. The decision was affirmed on appeal, with the amount owed to Juanita modified to P1,248 instead of P1,200.
This document summarizes a court case regarding the nullification of two marriages between Juanita Sison and Te Lay Li. The court found that Juanita's consent to marry was obtained through force and intimidation by her father. Juanita refused to marry Te Lay Li and her father beat her and threatened her with a knife to force her consent. The lower court declared the marriages null and void due to the intimidation. The decision was affirmed on appeal, with the amount owed to Juanita modified to P1,248 instead of P1,200.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
JUANITA SISON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE C.A.- G.R. NO.
7037- R -VERSUS- TE LAY LI, DEFENDANT-APPELANT
1. This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of First
Instance of Davao declaring the two marriages celebrated one after another on April 28, 1949, between plaintiff Juanita Sison and defendant Te Lay Li, null and void on the ground that plaintiff’s consent was obtained through force and intimidation employed upon her by her father. Plaintiff and defendant were married in the morning of April 28, 2019 before Judge Delfin Hofileña of the Municipal Court of Davao City, and in the afternoon of the same day were remarried in accordance with the rites of the Republic of China before Chinese Consul S.T. Mih in his office in Davao City. 2. Plaintiff refused to marry the defendant but was arranged by his father, that her father whipped her as often as she opposed the proposed marriage; that on one occasion when her father resorted to beating because she continually objected to marry defendant, she fell on a galvanized iron roofing sheet, resulting in a wound on her right leg which produced a scar six inches long, that the plaintiff run away from their house in order to get away from her father but succeeded in taking her home again on the promise that he would no longer force her to marry against her will. That on the evening of her return, her father renewed the subject of marriage and guarded her the whole night so she could not escape and the next morning handed her a knife, telling her to choose between losing her life or his if she did not marry defendant; that because of fear that her father might kill her, plaintiff consented to marry defendant. 3. After trial, the lower court rendered judgment finding that plaintiff’s marriage was consummated only by intimidation and force and that plaintiff never for a moment acquiesced to the status of a wife to the defendant, and declared the two marriages between plaintiff and defendant null and void. Defendant was also ordered to return to the plaintiff the sum of P1,200 and whatever personal belongings the latter had left in defendant’s house. From this judgment, defendant appeals to this court. That plaintiff’s consent to the marriage with defendant was procured by force and intimidation employed upon her by her father is, to our opinion, show by clear, positive, and satisfactory evidence. Not only does this fact appear from the uncontradicted testimony of plaintiff and her witnesses, but it is supported even by the declarations of defendant’s own witness. 4. In view of all the foregoing, the decision appealed from is affirmed, with the sole modification that the amount ordered returned to plaintiff should be P1,248.00, according to evidence, and not P1,200.00. Costs against appellant.