K2-Wind Turbine Specifications Report 1nov12
K2-Wind Turbine Specifications Report 1nov12
K2-Wind Turbine Specifications Report 1nov12
Prepared by:
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
Suite105, 100 Simcoe Street
Toronto, ON
M5H 3G2
In association with:
Stantec Consulting Ltd.;
SENES Consultants Limited; and
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
November 2012
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Report Requirements .......................................................................................................... 1
2.0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ..................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Siemens SWT-2.3 Wind Turbine ........................................................................................ 3
2.2 Acoustic Emissions Data .................................................................................................... 5
3.0 CLOSURE ........................................................................................................................................ 6
4.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................. 7
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Wind Turbine Specifications Report Requirements per Ontario Regulation 359/09 .................. 2
Table 2-1: Basic Wind Turbine Specifications ............................................................................................. 3
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page i
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
1.0 INTRODUCTION
K2 Wind Ontario Inc., in its capacity as general partner of K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
(the Proponent or K2 Wind), is proposing to develop, construct and operate the K2 Wind Power
Project (the Project) in the Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh (Township of ACW) north
of Goderich within the County of Huron, Ontario. The Proponent is a limited partnership formed
under the Limited Partnerships Act (Ontario), with K2 Wind Ontario Inc. as general partner and
CP K2 Holdings Inc. (an affiliate of Capital Power Corporation), Samsung Renewable Energy
Inc., and Pattern K2 LP Holdings LP (an affiliate of Pattern Renewable Holdings Canada ULC),
as limited partners. The Project would supply approximately 270 megawatts (MW) of electricity
to the Ontario power grid. The development of the Project would help the province of Ontario
meet its goal of increasing the proportion of electricity generated from renewable sources. The
Project is subject to Ontario Regulation 359/09 – Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1
of the Environmental Protection Act (O. Reg. 359/09).
Key Project components would consist of up to 140 wind turbines, electrical collection and
communications systems including a transmission line, a transformer station, a substation, an
operation and maintenance building, meteorological towers, access roads, and temporary
construction and laydown areas.
The Proponent has elected to assess and seek approval for some alternative Project
configurations. The Renewable Energy Approval (REA) application process will consider two
potential transmission line voltages (138 kV vs. 230 kV), two potential transmission line routes,
and several alternate access road and collector line alignments. Final selection of the sites to be
used would be based on the results of consultation activities, detailed design / engineering
work, and the conditions experienced during construction.
The Proponent retained Stantec Consulting Ltd., SENES Consultants Limited, and AMEC
Environment & Infrastructure, a division of AMEC Americas Limited (AMEC) to assist in the
preparation of the REA application with input from Timmins Martelle Heritage Consultants Inc.,
Selde Corporation and Zephyr North Canada.
The purpose of the Wind Turbine Specifications Report is to provide specific technical
information regarding the wind turbines proposed to be used for the Project.
The Wind Turbine Specifications Report has been prepared in accordance with Item 14, Table 1
of O. Reg. 359/09 and in consideration of the Ministry of the Environment’s (MOE’s) guidance
document Technical Guide to Renewable Energy Approvals.
The following table provides the requirements of the Wind Turbine Specifications Report as
prescribed in O. Reg. 359/09 and the relevant sections where it can be found within this
document.
Page 1
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
Table 1-1: Wind Turbine Specifications Report Requirements per Ontario Regulation 359/09
Section
ID Requirements
Number
Provide specifications of each wind turbine, including:
1. The make, model, name plate capacity, hub height above grade and rotational speeds. 2.1
The acoustic emissions data, determined and reported in accordance with standard CAN/CSA- 2.2
C61400-11-07, “Wind Turbine Generator Systems — Part 11: Acoustic Noise Measurement
2. Techniques”, dated October 2007, including the overall sound power level, measurement
uncertainty value, octave-band sound power levels (linear weighted) and tonality and tonal
audibility.
Page 2
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
The Project includes approximately 140 Siemens SWT-2.3 wind turbines. A summary of the
basic specifications of the turbine model is provided in Table 2.1 below. A complete description
of the general specifications for this turbine model is found in the manufacturer’s brochure
provided as Appendix A.
Page 3
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
The tower supports the nacelle which is accessible via a hatch in the floor and houses the main
components of the wind turbine including:
• Main bearing;
• Main shaft;
• Gearbox;
• Brake disc;
• Coupling;
• Generator;
• Service crane;
• Yaw ring;
• Yaw gear;
• Nacelle bedplate;
• Oil filter;
• Canopy; and
• Generator fan.
The rotor hub is cast in nodular cast iron and is fitted to the main shaft with a flange connection.
The hub is sufficiently large to provide a comfortable working environment for two service
technicians during maintenance of the blade roots and pitch bearings from inside the structure.
The Siemens SWT-2.3 turbine uses unique features such as NetConverter® power conversion
system which allows generator operation at variable speed, frequency and voltage while
supplying power at a constant frequency and voltage to the MV transformer. The 101 m rotor
supports three blades and a hub. Each blade is constructed of fibreglass reinforced epoxy in
Siemens’ proprietary IntegralBlade® manufacturing process. The blades are 49 m in length.
Each blade has its own independent pitching mechanism capable of feathering the blade under
any operating condition. The blade pitch arrangement allows for optimization of the power
output throughout the operating range, and the blades are feathered during standstill to
minimize wind loads.
Electrical wiring includes a 690 V cable which runs down the turbine tower to the padmount
transformer located adjacent to the tower base. A padmount transformer, located adjacent to
the base of each wind turbine, is required to transform the electricity created in the nacelle to a
standard operating power line voltage (i.e. 690 V to 34.5 kV). The converter is also located at
the base of the turbine and controls the energy conversion in the generator by feeding power to
and from the grid. From the padmount transformer, underground 34.5 kV collector lines would
carry the electricity from the turbines to the collector line system.
Page 4
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
Turbine tower lighting would be in accordance with Transport Canada Regulations and
Standards as described in the Design and Operations Report.
The Siemens SWT-2.3 wind-powered turbines are rated to operate between 1.824 and
2.300 MW. The maximum overall sound power rating of the highest rated turbines (2.300 MW)
is 106.0 dBA. Information regarding the acoustic emissions of the turbine, including the overall
sound power level, measurement uncertainty value, octave-band sound power levels, and
tonality and tonal audibility, is available in the manufacturer specifications provided in
Appendix A.
Page 5
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
3.0 CLOSURE
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership, in association with Stantec Consulting Ltd., SENES
Consultants Limited, and AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, has completed this report for
the exclusive use of the Proponent for specific application to the Project. The work has been
completed in accordance with Ontario Regulation 359/09, and in consideration of the guidance
document Technical Guide to Renewable Energy Approvals.
Prepared by:
rpt_60738_wtsr_201211_final.docx
Page 6
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
4.0 REFERENCES
Ontario Regulation 359/09. Renewable Energy Approvals Under Part V.0.1 of the Act made
under the Environmental Protection Act.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 2011 & 2012. Technical Guide to Renewable Energy
Approvals. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. PIBS 8472e.
Page 7
K2 Wind Ontario Limited Partnership
K2 Wind Power Project
Wind Turbine Specifications Report
November 2012
APPENDIX A:
Siemens SWT-2.3 Specifications
Noise Measurement,
Noise Measurement
SWP Report
N-2304 099-T1
Ejler Kristensen
25.05.2011
Contents
1 Measurement ...........................................................................................................................4
2 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................4
2.1 Results............................................................................................................................... 4
3 Analysis of Sound Power Level .............................................................................................5
3.1 Sound Power Level .......................................................................................................... 5
4 Analyses of Tonality ...............................................................................................................8
4.1 Info ..................................................................................................................................... 8
4.1.1 Tonal analysis method ............................................................................................... 8
4.2 Tonal analysis at 6 m/s .................................................................................................... 8
4.2.1 Tonality analysis at 117.5 Hz..................................................................................... 9
4.3 Tonal analysis at 7 m/s .................................................................................................... 9
4.3.1 Tonality analysis at 118.8 Hz................................................................................... 10
4.3.2 Tonality analysis at 495.3 Hz................................................................................... 10
4.4 Tonal analysis at 8 m/s .................................................................................................. 11
4.4.1 Tonality analysis at 517.3 Hz................................................................................... 11
4.5 Tonal analysis at 9 m/s .................................................................................................. 12
4.5.1 Tonality analysis at 517.8 Hz................................................................................... 12
4.6 Tonal analysis at 10 m/s ................................................................................................ 13
4.6.1 Tonality analysis at 519.3 Hz................................................................................... 13
Appendix 1 Non acoustic measurements 10 s average ...........................................................14
Appendix 2 Acoustic overall analyzer measurements 10 s average.......................................16
1 Measurement
The measurement was performed at turbine xx at xxxxxx Wind farm in Ontario on 16th April 2011
from 14:43 to 18:07 by Ejler Kristensen, Siemens Wind Power. The measurement computer time
was synchronized with the turbine computer time.
The hub height wind speed range from 4.6 m/s - 14.0 m/s measured as 10 sec average with the
nacelle anemometer, and the power output from 430 kW - 2300 kW.
2 Conclusion
A noise measurement has been performed at turbine xx at xxxxxx Wind Farm.
2.1 Results
The results are shown in table 2.1 below:
LWA [dB re. 1 pW] 101.7 104.4 104.9 105.1 105.6 105.1
Max. tonal audibility, ǻLa,k [dB] - -4.7 -3.2 -0.6 0.8 2.1
Table 2.1: Results of the measurements
Sound power levels, LWA, of the turbine are below guaranteed values.
The level of tonality in the reference position (near field) is acceptable. The maximum tonality
measured in the reference position is -0.2 dB at 519.3 Hz, which corresponds to an audibility of
2.1 dB.
Figure 3.1 shows measured sound pressure levels. Table 3.1 shows the resulting sound power
level without extrapolation of the regression results.
Date: 16-04-2011
Engineer: EJK
Location: XXXXX in Ontario
Turbine-ID: T1
Hub Height: 80m
Distance: 130m
Roughness: 0,05m
K-Faktor: 0.7418
V_P/V_Anemo: 1.041
Calibrator with serial type 4231 serial no. 2326419 has been measured to 93,89 dB at Brüel &
Kjær – Nærum DK with reference to calibration letter of 25. maj 2011.
The calibrating signal was measured to 93,8 dB at the beginning of the measurement. See
appendix 2
Windspeed [m/s] 10 m 5 6 7 8 9 10
Averaged 2 PitchBladeB: [deg] -1,67 -2,52 -1,57 0,9 3,86 7,27
Averaged 5 MainSRpm: [RPM] 13,14 14,44 14,55 15,23 15,55 15,62
Averaged 6 ActPower: [kW] 824,93 1397,41 1885 2259,79 2296,43 2295,79
Averaged 7 AcWindSp: [m/s] 7,1 8,12 9,5 10,73 11,99 13,43
Averaged 8 GenRpm: [RPM] 1190,69 1308,2 1318,88 1379,96 1409,2 1415,96
Laeq total [dB(A) re 20 μPa] 53,1 55,85 56,33 56,58 57,04 56,63
Laeq BG [dB(A) re 20 μPa] 36,52 38,35 39,96 41,35 42,51 43,45
Laeq BG corr. [dB(A) re 20 μPa] 53,01 55,78 56,23 56,44 56,89 56,41
LWA [dB(A) re pW] 101,67 104,44 104,90 105,11 105,55 105,08
*) difference between LAeg total and LAeq BG is between 3 and 6 dB(A)
All wind speeds are measured in hub height and are recalculated to 10 m height.
Background Definition
Power [kW]: <20
RPM [1/min]: <20
Used Powercurve:
C:\VBA-Pulse\Powercurves\SWT-2 3-101.txt
Status Setting
Status1: Status1 used Powercurve for Calculation
Range Values:
Time z-Index
22
50 calibrator
63
200 mic moved
750
804 mic moved
319
325 xxxxx at mic.
384
408 mic moved
4 Analyses of Tonality
4.1 Info
Txxx, ID no. 23xx-xxxx.
Due to air absorption, different level of masking noise etc. tonal analysis in the reference position is
not comparable with tonality analysis in the far field.
The twelve 10 sec. FFT spectra are shown in Figure 4.1 below.
Figure 4.1: The twelve 10 sec FFT spectra used for tonal analysis.
Results are shown below as well as examples of tonality analysis at each frequency.
The twelve 10 sec. FFT spectra are shown in Figure 4.2 below.
Figure 4.2: The twelve 10 sec FFT spectra used for tonal analysis.
Results are shown below as well as examples of tonality analysis at each frequency.
The twelve 10 sec. FFT spectra are shown in Figure 4.3 below.
Figure 4.3: The twelve 10 sec FFT spectra used for tonal analysis.
Results are shown below as well as examples of tonality analysis at each frequency.
The twelve 10 sec. FFT spectra are shown in Figure 4.4 below.
Figure 4.4: The twelve 10 sec FFT spectra used for tonal analysis.
Results are shown below as well as examples of tonality analysis at each frequency.
The twelve 10 sec. FFT spectra are shown in Figure 4.5 below.
Figure 4.5: The twelve 10 sec FFT spectra used for tonal analysis.
Results are shown below as well as examples of tonality analysis at each frequency.
18
Meas start 14:43 Meas stop 18:02
16
14
12
10
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1k 1,1k 1,2k 1,3k
[] (Nominal Values)
Figure A1.1: Dark green line: Measured 10 s avg. wind speed from the nacelle anemometer.
2,8k
2,4k
2k
1,6k
1,2k
800
400
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1k 1,1k 1,2k 1,3k
[] (Nominal Values)
Figure A1.2: Dark green line: Measured 10 s avg. produced power. Light green line shows max
instantaneous measurements within the averaging period.
280
Ref.pos 150 new ref.pos
212 new ref
240
200
new ref 232
160
120
Z63 yaw out of limit
80
40
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1k 1,1k 1,2k 1,3k
[] (Nominal Values)
Figure A1.3: Dark green line: Measured 10 s avg. yaw position.
Figure A2.1: Dark green line: Measured 10 s avg. overall analyzer values.
High
SWT-2.3-93 SWT-2.3-82
Turbulence
SWT-2.3-101
Siemens has been a major driver of innovation in the wind Siemens’ record, when it comes to on-time delivery, is
power industry since the early 1980s when wind turbine impeccable. Long-lasting customer relationships, based on
technology was still in its infancy. the successful installation of wind turbines, provide for a
sound, sustainable and profitable investment.
Technology has changed with the times, but Siemens’
commitment to providing its customers with proven wind Drawing on 140 years of experience in the energy sector,
turbine solutions remains the same. a strong focus on renewables and a global network of highly
skilled and trained employees, Siemens has proven itself to
The combination of robust and reliable turbines, highly
be a trustworthy and reliable business partner. And will
efficient solutions for power transmission and distribution
continue to be in the future.
and a deep understanding of the entire energy market ensures
that Siemens will continue to be a leading supplier.
The Siemens SWT-2.3-101 turbine is designed to deliver The SWT-2.3-101 is designed to last. The robust and reliable
unparalleled performance and reliability, making it design offers a high yield with low maintenance costs. The turbine
especially suited to areas with moderate wind conditions. is backed by advanced condition monitoring and diagnostics,
which constantly examine the turbine. Any change in a turbine’s
The SWT-2.3-101 turbine offers low energy production costs
performance is promptly addressed by an experienced after-sales
and joins Siemens’ 2.3-MW product family, which has proven
service team either remotely or in the field.
availabilitity that is among the highest in the industry. The
101-meter rotor is specifically designed to optimize the energy If you desire a better return on investment and superior availability,
output in areas with moderate wind conditions. The turbine is also take a closer look at the SWT-2.3-101 turbine.
ideal for all types of grid connections in most major markets.
3
Superior performance gives higher yields
4
No compromise on reliability
5
Technical
specifications
6
1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12
11
13
2 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
7
Published by and copyright © 2009:
Siemens AG
Energy Sector
Freyeslebenstrasse 1
91058 Erlangen, Germany
Siemens AG
Siemens Wind Power A/S
Borupvej 16
7330 Brande, Denmark
www.siemens.com/wind
www.siemens.com/energy