Farming System in

FARMING SYSTEM IN
ASSAM
BY
DR. B. C. BHOWMICK
DR. A. K. SARMA
DR. K. C. TALUKDAR
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
ASSAM AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
JORHAT -785013
FARMING SYSTEM IN ASSAM
By
Dr.B.C.Bhowmick
Dr.A.K.Sarma
Sr.K.C.Talukdar
@1999 by authors, Department of Agricultural
Economics, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat.
All rights reserved. No part of this report may be
reproduced in any form, by Mimeograph or any
other means, without permission in writing from the
authors.
Printed by Authors
Department of Agricultural Economics,
Assam Agricultural University,
Jorhat- 785013
NABARD CHAIR SCHEME UNIT
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
JORHAT - 785013
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. B. C. Bhowmick
Professor
PREFACE
The present work entitled Farming System in Assam was accomplished based on
series of research and micro level studies conducted during the last 10 years by myself and also
by Post Graduate and Ph. D. students in the Department of Agricultural Economics, under my
personal supervision and guidance.
The exercise is expected to be of use to researcher, student, and policy maker in general
and the farmers in different agro-climatic zones of the state in particular. The report provides
some basic information on the prevailing farming systems in the state. This will also help the
researcher to carry out further research to improve the systems once the strength and weakness
of the present systems are identified. Unfortunately, no information on the prevailing system in
the Barak Valley Zone of the state could be incorporated in this report due to lack of adequate
micro level studies and Hill zone is partially represented because of limited information available
on the zone.
I must record here the help received from my colleagues Dr. A. K. Sarma and Dr. K. C.
Talukdar, Professors, Department of Agricultural Economics, FA, AAU, Jorhat for their constant
help and contribution in preparing this report. I am thankful to Dr.J.Gogoi, Jr.Scientist,
Directorate of Research who helped us in preparation of some graphs used in this report.
This report would not have come out in this shape had I not received constant help and
encouragement from Dr. A. K. Pathak, honourable Director of Research, Assam Agricultural
University, Jorhat. I sincerely record here our gratitude to him for his help and encouragement.
I would like to acknowledge my heartfelt gratitude to our honourable vice-chancellor
who always inspires us to carry out productive and purposeful research and also for his constant
help and support.
Place: AAU, Jorhat-13 (B. C. Bhowmick)
Date: 01.10.99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: (91) (0376) 320947(O), 323450® FAX: (91)(0376) 340006, 325344
E-mail: bcbhowmick@ aau.ac.in
JORHAT 785013, INDIA
Prof. A.N. Mukhopadhyay Ph.D.,F.A.A.Sc.
VICE-CHANCELLOR
FOREWARD
I am delighted to learn that Dr. Bhowmick and his colleagues has compiled
relevant information and prepared the report entitled FARMING SUSTEM IN
ASSAM within a short period of time. It is indeed a felt need to have information on the
prevailing farming systems in the state of Assam. The team deserves high appreciation for
doing such a useful piece of work within a short time.
I believe that this report will provide useful basic information on the prevailing
farming systems in different agro-climatic zones of the state.
I am sure that this report will also be useful to researchers, extension workers,
policy makers and other field functionaries involved directly or indirectly in agriculture.
Place: AAU, Jorhat-785013 (Dr.A.N. Mukhopadhyay)
Date: 01.10.99
Phone: (91) (0376) 320965(O), 320995® FAX: (91)(0376) 320919, 325344
E-mail: VC@ aau.ac.in, [email protected]
CONTENTS
PAGE
FOREWARD I
PREFACE II
CHAPTER -I CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND OF 1 - 5
FARMING SYSTEM
CHAPTER - II BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6 - 21
GOVERNING FARMING SYSTEM
PROGRAMME IN DIFFERENTAGROCLIMATIC
ZONES OF ASSAM
CHAPTER -III METHODOLOGY 22 - 22
CHAPTER - IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 23 - 43
CHAPTER - V CONCLUSION AND POLICY 44 - 45
IMPLICATION
BIBLIOGRAPHY i - ii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE TITLE PAGE NO
2.1 Distribution of Sample Households by Size Categories 21
and Agro-Climatic Zones of Assam
4.1 Distribution of sample Farm Households in Different 24 -26
Agro-Climatic zones of Assam According to Farming
System(s) Practised
4.2.1 Details of the Major Farming Systems in Lower 28
Brahmaputra Valley Zone of Assam According to
Farm Size
4.2.2 Details of the Major Farming Systems in Central 29
Farm Size
4.2.3 Details of the Major Farming Systems in North 30
Bank Plain Zone of Assam According to Farm Size
4.2.4 Details of the Major Farming Systems in Upper 31
Farm Size
4.2.5 Details of the Major Farming Systems in Hills Zone 32
of Assam According to Farm Size
4.2.6 Details of the Major Farming Systems in Char Areas 33
of Assam According to Farm Size
4.3.1 Composition of Homestead Farming in Different Agro 35
Climatic Zones of Assam
4.3.2 Composition of Homestead Farming in North Bank 35
Plain Zone of Assam
4.4.1 Relative Share of Various Components in Net Return 37
In the Major Farming Systems in Lower Brahmaputra
Valley Zone of Assam
4.4.2 Relative Share of Various Components in Working Capital 37
In the Major Farming Systems in Lower Brahmaputra
4.4.3 Relative Share of Various Components in Human Labour 37
Employment in the Major Farming Systems in Lower
Brahmaputra Valley Zone of Assam
in the Major Farming Systems in Central Brahmaputra
in the Major Farming Systems in Central Brahmaputra
Valley Zone of Assam Plain Zone of Assam
Employment in the Major Farming Systems in Central
in the Major Farming Systems in North Bank Plain Zone
of Assam
in the Major Farming Systems in North Bank Plain Zone
of Assam
Employment in the Major Farming System in North Bank
Plain Zone of Assam
in the Major Farming Systems in Upper Brahmaputra
in the Major Farming Systems in Upper Brahmaputra Valley
Zone of Assam
Employment in the Major Farming Systems in Upper
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig No Title Between Page
Fig 2.1 Map of Assam Showing the Agro-climatic 8-9
Zones
Fig 4.1 Relative Share of Various Components in the Major Farming 37-38
Systems in Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone
Systems in Central Brahmaputra Valley Zone
Systems in North Bank Plain Zone
Systems in Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone
CHAPTER - I
CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND OF FARMING SYSTEM
Assam is one of the important states of the Indian Union where agriculture is the
mainstay of the state economy. Agriculture is the main source of income for over 80 per
cent of the rural population of the state. The primary sector alone contributes about 41 per
cent of the state domestic product .The average operational holding in the state is 1.31 ha
and over 60 per cent of the total operational holdings in the state are marginal i.e., less
than 1 ha and 23 per cent of the holdings are small i.e., 1 to 2 ha, 14 per cent holdings
between 2 to 3 ha are medium and only 3 per cent holdings are large i.e., above 3 ha. Thus
over 83 per cent holdings in the state are marginal and small. The viability and
sustainability of the weaker section of the society especially the small and marginal
farmers largely depend on the success of agriculture. Unfortunately the subsistence nature
of agriculture, inadequate investment in agriculture and lack of interest in farming often
results in poor return from farming. Malallocation or inefficient utilization of scarce
resources and improper enterprise mix hinders achieving desired results from farm
business. It is important for the resource poor farmer to identify suitable enterprises, which
can be efficiently incorporated in a farm plan depending on availability of resources in a
farm family. In general a farmer is always confronted with the problem of selecting proper
enterprise mix, which can provide maximum possible return and create adequate
employment opportunities beside utilization of other available resources in the farm. Here
we can realize the importance of farming system.
The word system itself signifies the assemblage of objects united by some form of
regular interaction or interdependence. It is an organized unitary whole composed of two
or more interdependent and interacting parts or components or sub-systems delineated by
identifiable boundary or its environmental super system. Farming is a stochastic dynamic,
biological and open system with human and social involvement. It specifically refers to
crop-combination or enterprise -mix in which the products and/or the by-products of one
enterprise serve as the input for the production of other enterprise1.
1 Maji, C.C., Farming System Approach to Research, IJAE, Vol. XLVI (3), 1991
Different subject matter specialists have given different definitions of farming
system to suit their own objective .The definition as given by some experts in their paper
presented in the International Workshop on Farming System organized by ICRISAT, from
November 18-21, 1974 at Hyderabad seems to be most appropriate as it embodied almost
all relevant disciplines and areas concerning the subject. Accordingly, Krantz (1974)
defined Farming System as 'the entire complex of development, management and
allocation of resources as well as decisions and activities, which within an operational
farm unit or a combination of such units, results in agricultural production, and the
processing and marketing of the products'2. Tezwani (1974) defined farming system as 'the
entire complex of resources preparations, allocations, decisions and activities, which
within an operational farm unit or a combination of such units, result in agricultural
production'3. ICRISAT while defining the Farming System Programme, has also amplified
that the programme includes agricultural crops, fruit trees, forest trees, forages, grasses
and animals, which have potential to contribute to improve resource use and
management4.
In general there are three important components of a farming system
(whole farm business) viz., (I) crop component usually taken up in the main crop fields (ii)
animal component usually taken up within the homestead and (iii) homestead farming
which include other allied activities taken up within the homestead. Each of the above
components may have one or more of several activities or processes. Thus selection,
production/cultivation and /or rearing of the activities within a farm will determine the
nature of farming system being practiced in any situation. Nevertheless, the kind of
activities (crop or animals) included under each component depend on their suitability,
adaptability, marketability and ability to satisfy the needs of a farm family .The experience
of the farmer and his predecessors (father and forefather) over years enable them to select
the activities under each system. In fact the farmer has been experimenting with the crops
and the crop varieties or species and animal types or breeds knowingly or unknowingly
2 Krantz, B. A, Cropping Pattern for increasing and Stabilizing Agricultural Production in the Semi-Arid Tropics,
International Workshop on Farming Systems, Nov.18-21, 1974 Organized by ICRISAT, Hyderabad,
3 Tezwani, K. G., Case Studies in Farming Systems in the semi-Arid Tropics in India, International
Workshop on Farming Systems ,Nov.18-21, Organized by ICRISAT,Hyderabad, 1974
over years before finally incorporating these in the farm plan. Therefore, basically it is a
case of simulation and experimenting with crops and animals before incorporating them in
any system. Once a system is identified its adoption will primarily depend on availability
of different types of limited resources at the disposal of the farmer.
Basically, the farming system of a common farmer consist of several
activities which may include some field crops grown in different crop seasons, few
animals, some vegetable crops grown either in the main crop field commercially or on
small scale in the kitchen garden, some fruits and plantation crops beside activities like
bee keeping, sericulture and weaving etc. taken up in the homestead. Although it is
typically a case of mixed farming yet the farming system differs from farm to farm, place
to place and land situation to land situation and agro-climatic zone to agro-climatic zone.
The type of a particular farming system adopted by a farmer depends on his own resource
endowment, environmental condition and other social and religious taboos. In spite of
differences in the composition of a system there are some common characteristics in the
systems invouge in different agro-climatic zones of the state. Due to vastness, farming
system is best studied on representative case farms to distinguish understanding required
which include operation of the system, the repair and improvement of the system, and
construction of new systems. The dynamics of structural changes of farming system
among others include changes in land use pattern, production relations, land tenures, size
of holding and their distribution, irrigation, marketing including transport and storage,
credit institutions and financial markets, and research and education.
Farming system research needs to be conducted in different agro-climatic regions
for the purpose of planning for agricultural development of the region. In the process, the
level of natural endowments and the fixed factors, which are location specific, should be
considered. However, agro-ecological zoning helps acquiring first hand information on the
strength and weakness of the natural endowments and of the comparative technological
and economic advantages of the concerned zone. This will improve the system removing
the binding constraints. Farming system research based on agro-ecological zone, which
4 Ibid, p 141
are homogeneous in respect of endowment of natural resources, cropping pattern and
socio-economic situations. Involvement of a farmer in a farming system is crucial as he is
to produce his food, fodder, fuel and fiber for attaining self sustainability as well as
economic and food security under resource constraints. Efficiency of the system can be
brought substantially by examining yield gap of the crops/enterprises, quantity and
distribution of rainfall, incidence of pest and diseases, bringing biological, physical and
economic interdependence. It needs a multidisciplinary approach and the farmer himself is
a multidisciplinary man who should not be ignored in problem solving farming system
research. Government policies change in input and output prices, change in technological
innovations in the production of crop/enterprise often change the cropping
pattern/enterprise mix leading to a change in farming system. Change in consumption
habit, risk in farming economic programme of the Govt. like production of export
oriented, high valued crops, local and regional market demand, farmers own needs,
mechanization also change the farming system of a farmer. Such change may be dramatic
when favourable policies are combined with improved technologies. Studies on such
changes on farming system will be helpful in formulation and implementation of
appropriate agricultural polices so as to remove imbalances in the research priorities,
enterprise-mix and hence in the allocation of resources.
The state of Assam is divided in to six broad agro-climatic zones viz.;
Lower Brahmaputra Valley comprising the erstwhile district of Kamrup and Goalpara,
Central Brahmaputra Valley comprising Nagaon district, North Bank Plain comprising
Lakhimpur and Darrang district, Upper Brahmaputra Valley comprising Sibsagar and
Dibrugarh district, Barak Valle comprising Cachar district and Hill zone comprising the
hill districts of Karbi Anglong and North Cachar district. In total 49 agro ecological
situations have been identified (NARP) in the 6 major agro-climatic zones of the state.
The present exercise is an attempt to show the farming systems in vogue in different agro
climatic zones of the state covering some of the agro-ecological situations, relative
importance of different component in respect of capital investment, income and
employment generation.
Nevertheless, the identified systems should amply demonstrate the true
representations of the systems prevailed in different situations under different categories
of farm households. The composition of the farming system, their relative importance and
economics will provide a first hand information on the existing systems. This could be a
base to judge the strength or weakness of the system so that future improvement may be
brought about for further development of the system through appropriate technological
intervention.
CHAPTER - II
BACKGROUND INFORMATION GOVERNING FARMING
SYSTEM PROGRAMME IN DIFFERENT AGROCLIMATIC
ZONES OF ASSAM
The state of Assam has a total geographical area of 78,532 sq. km with 23
administrative districts. The total cropped area of the state is 3,460,082 ha with the net
sown area of 2705676 ha and the cropping intensity is 128 per cent. Total fallow land in
the state is 2.20 per cent while the pasture and grazing land, misc. tree crops and grooves
etc. and cultivable wasteland are 2.34, 3.15 and 1.32 per cent respectively, Land put to
non-agricultural use and barren and uncultivable land are 11.65 and 19.62 per cent
respectively.
Hot summer and mild to moderately cold winter characterize the climate of the
state. Rainfall and humidity are considered as a crucial resource for crop and livestock
production. The annual rainfall in the state varies from 1044 mm in certain parts of
Nagaon to more than 3000 mm in Kokrajhar and Lakhimpur district. This has influenced
the crop and livestock pattern including fishery in the state. The Lower Brahmaputra
Valley with the exception of Kokrajhar district normally receives less rainfall than the
Upper Brahmaputra and Barak Valley Zones. The soil moisture regime in the plain
districts of Assam is mainly udic; whereas in the hill districts it is both udic and ustic
suitable for growing field and plantation crops, farm forestry, fishery and livestock.
The state is divided into six agro-climatic zones based on factors like topography
and terrain, ecology and climate influencing land use pattern, crop-mix, cropping intensity
and crop productivity. The agro-climatic zones are (i) Barak Valley Zone( ii) Central
Brahmaputra Valley Zone( iii) Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone (iv) North Bank Plain
Zone( v) Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone and (vi) Hills Zone of Assam.
Fig.2.1
_ Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone
_ Central Brahmaputra Valley Zone
_ Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone
_ North Bank Plain Zone
_ Barak Valley Zone
_ Hills Zone
ZONAL MAP OF ASSAM

Barak Valley Zone
The zone has a geographical area of 6941.2 sq. km (8.84% of state) with three
districts, viz. Cachar, Hailakandi and Karimganj. It has eight physiographic divisions, viz.
(i) High hill region (ii) Dissected foot hill region (iii) Low hill region, (iv) Undulating plain,
(v) Detraital Valley, (vi) Broad meander plain, (vii) Flood plain and (viii) Low lying area.
Soils of the zone vary from sandy type to clay soil mostly suitable for field crops
including horticultural crops. The soil pH ranges from 4.6 to 5.7. The soils can be
classified into (i) Old riverine alluvial (ii) Old mountain alluvium (iii) non-laterised red
soils (iv) laterised red soils and (v) peat soils. Among all types of soil, the largest area of
the zone is covered by non-laterised red soils surrounding the entire alluvial region on all
sides. Generally peat soils are found in scattered patches of low-lying beel areas of
different agro ecological situations of the zone. Apart from crops, the zone is suitable for
fish and animals rearing through out the year.
Climate
The zone is characterized by sub-tropical, Warm and humid climate and receives
an average annual rainfall of 3180 mm which is the highest in Karimganj. About 56 per
cent of total rainfall is confined to June to August. Temperature ranges from 12.2o C to
32o C with the relative humidity of 92 to 98 per cent. It is congenial to grow most of the
crops during the year.
Land use pattern
Barak Valley zone has 38.58 per cent of total geographical area under forest, 33.08
per cent as net shown area and 8.48 per cent as area sown more than once. About 5.47 per
cent of land are used for plantation crops, miscellaneous trees and other. The forest
coverage is the highest in Hailakandi district (55.83%) with the highest cropping intensity.
Intensity of land use was low in Karimganj and Cachar district with high proportion of
cultivable wasteland. In the recent years, the cropping intensity has been found to
increase. Besides, shifting cultivation is also practiced in the southern hill areas of the
zone adjoining Mizoram. Mixed cropping of colocasia, turmeric, ginger and other spices
are practiced in those areas.
Agro-Ecological situations
Depending upon the factors like physiography, soil types, flood proneness, water
retention/stagnation, cropping pattern etc., the Barak Valley Zone is delineated in to five
agro-ecological situations, viz., (i) Alluvial Flood Free Situation (ii) Alluvial Flood Prone
situation (iii) Beel and Hoars (iv) Piedmont and Plantation Crop situation and (v) Hills and
Forest.
In situation (i) rice is cultivated in high, medium and up land situation as mono or
double crop. In high and medium land rice is also grown in sequence with
vegetables/potato/mustard/pulses while sali rice is a mono crop in low-lying areas in
sequence with ahu rice.
Situation (ii) is featured with medium to low lands, which are submerged during
monsoon. Ahu rice followed by sali rice/vegetables/potato/oil seeds and vegetables as
mono crop is commonly practiced under this situation.
Situation (iii) is featured with low-lying water bodies having perennial water
bodies. Boro rice is cultivated in the traditional areas as mono crop. Natural fisheries are
common in this situation.
Situation (iv) is characterized by the presence of dissected foothills, low hills, and
undulating topography with tilla and narrow valleys. It is featured with high lands,
hillocks, detriantal valleys, and tillas. The common crops are tea, pineapple, fruit trees,
sugarcane and vegetables.
Situation (v) has mostly non-laterised red-soils, laterite red soils, sandy and loamy
with fine silt. It is covered by reserved forests, and mixed rain forest. The tribal people
commonly practice shifting cultivation and mixed cropping in forest villages. The
situation has potentialities for growing horticultural crops and rearing animals.
Central Brahmaputra Valley Zone
It comprises mainly the undivided Nagaon district with an area of 5561 sq. km.
The zone has extended from hills to plains creating number of physiographic variations. It
has low hills, and hillocks extended to Karbi Anglong, Piedmont and high land areas in
the eastern and southern sides, flood plain tract along the Brahmaputra delineated with
recent flood and old flood plains, Char and Chaparis as well as the beel areas.
Soils
The zone is composed of both most recent immature soils (Entisol) in the Char
areas and old mature soils (Alfisols) in piedmont highlands and hill areas, suitable for
cultivation of all types of field and horticultural crops and fisheries.
Climate
The zone experiences hot and humid summer and dry and cool winter.
Temperature varies from 8o C to 34.3o C with the humidity of 37 per cent to 90 per cent.
The average rainfall ranges from 1200 to 2000 mm and its distribution varies from one
part to the other influencing the cropping pattern.
Land use pattern
The net sown area of the zone is 4.02 lakh hectare and about 1.83 lakh hectares are
double cropped. Forest coverage is 17.50 per cent while 15.10 per cent of total
geographical area is barren and put to non-agricultural use.
Horticulture
The zone has diversification of horticultural crops including tea and forest.
Homestead gardens are more prominent. The fruits grown are mainly banana, coconut,
arecanut, jack fruits, mango and papaya while the common vegetables are brinjal, tomato,
potato, pea, cabbage, cauliflower, knol-khol, carrot, beans, Lady’s finger, ridge gourd,
pointed gourd, pumpkin, bottle gourd and other leafy vegetables. Cultivation of spices and
condiments are also widely done. Commercialization of vegetables varies in the zone due
to wide variations in soil, rainfall and market accessibility.
Agro-ecological situations
Considering the variations in physiography, climatic, soils, flood cropping pattern
etc. the zone has been delineated into nine agro-ecological situations. They are i) Humid
alluvial non-flood situation, ii) Sub-humid alluvial non-flood situation, iii) Alluvial Flood,
iv) Char land, v) Humid Piedmont and high land, vi) Sub-humid piedmont and high land,
vii) Hill areas, viii) Forest and ix) Tea estates. In first three situations, soil texture is
mainly Inceptisol, Alfisols and Entisols forming clay, clay loam, sandy loam, loamy sand
with varying degrees of rainfall and land types. The common crops are rice, jute, pulses,
oilseeds, wheat vegetables and sugarcane.
In char land situation soil texture is sandy loam and loamy sand where principal
crops are vegetables, oilseeds, pulses and wheat. However, in situation (v) and (vi) apart
from field crops, forest and plantation crops are also grown. The soil is red to pink in
colour. In the Hill situation, soil is formed with residual red, pinkish, hill soils having low
hills and hillocks. The common crops grown are rice, sesamum, colocasia, arhar,
pineapple etc. This ecological situation grows rainfed crops, coffee, rubber, and tea as well
as forest trees. The forest situation is rich in teak, sal and mixed rain forest. It has reserved
forest and forest villages. This situation is suitable for livestock, plantation crops and
forest based farming system.
In situation (ix) tea is the main plantation crop. Rice is also grown in the low lying
inter tilla or high land areas.
Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone
The Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone comprises of seven districts with a
geographical area of 20,288 sq. km. The zone is divided into two parts by the mighty
Brahmaputra flowing through it.
Physiography
The zone has both plain and undulating topography with isolated hillocks,
depressions, perennial rivers, tributaries and minor streams. Foothills of Bhutan towards
north, high plain in the middle, flank Kokrajhar district with number of small streams,
springs and abandoned canals. The Goalpara district has few scattered hillocks with
number of reserve forests, perennial rivers, minor streams, artificial ponds and beels.
Soils
The zone has both new and old alluvium soil and the texture varies from sandy to
sandy loam, silty loam, clay loam and clay. Soils in Char areas towards the Brahmaputra
rive are poor in nutrients, especially organic carbon, phosphate and potash.
Climate
The climate of the zone is sub-tropical warm humid. The average rainfall varies
from 1065 mm to 3864 mm during monsoon and 111mm to 280 mm in the post monsoon
period. The highest temperature goes up to 38o C with relative humidity of 80 per cent.
Land use pattern
The zone has 64.65 per cent of total geographical area and its gross cropped area is
1170 thousand hectares. Forest and wasteland cover 19.04 and 4.00 per cent of total
geographical area respectively while water bodies covers 8.86 per cent of it.
Agro -ecological situations
The Zone has considerable variations in respect of Physiography, soil, climate and
cropping pattern and the Zone has been delineated into two major heads,(i)foot hills
covering an area of 752,185 hectares and( ii) plains with an area of 1061,904 hectares
within which nine agro-ecological situations have been identified. These situations are i)
Foot hills old Mountain Valley Alluvial plain ii) Foot hills old Mountain Valley Alluvial
Forest iii) Flood prone Recent Riverine Alluvial Plains iv) Flood Free old Riverine
Alluvial Middle Plains v) Forest Land old Alluvial Plains vi) Hills and Hillock old
Alluvial vii) Beels viii) High Land Tea Garden and ix) Char land situation
In situation (I), Rainfall is high, soil comprises of old mountain valley alluvial and
laterised red soil and soil texture varies from loamy to heavy loam. It is suitable for
growing cereals, pulses, oilseeds, fibre crops and millets. The situation (ii) is
predominated by forest having forest villages and it receives high rainfall during the year.
Situation (iii) deep water, deep-water situations are also available while situation (iv) has
tea estates and forests. Situation (v) is similar to situation (ii) with alluvial plains.
Situation (v) is mainly formed with hills and hillock where the soil texture is sandy and
sandy loam old alluvial. The important crops are rice, sesamum, colocassia, arhar and
pineapple. Due to high elevation, this situation has scope to grow fruit crops and other
horticultural crops. The main character of situation (vii) is that it has marshy/swampy land
with high annual rainfall; deep-water rice, boro rice and fishery can be developed in this
situation. Situation (viii) is especially suitable for tea estates and forestry, high land crops
including horticultural crops and the low lying inter tilla or high land areas are utilized for
rice cultivation. Situation (ix) is specific in the catchment of Brahmaputra with high
rainfall and new alluvial soils, which are clay, sandy and silty.
North Bank Plain Zone
The zone comprises of three districts, viz. Lakhimpur, Sonitpur and Darrang. The
zone is primarily agrarian in character.
Physiography
The zone has undulating topography and it has been delineated into five
physiographic variations, viz. (i) Foot hill belt along Arunachal Pradesh, (ii) Old Flood
Plain (Upper terrace) representing northern belt of flood plain (iii) Old Flood Plain (lower
terrace) spreading southern boundary of the middle plain, (iv) Recent Flood Plain
representing low lying active flood plain of the river Brahmaputra and its tributaries and
(v) Marshes and swamps known as beels which remain perennially waterlogged.
Soils
The zone has alluvial soil and the chief characteristics of the soils are acidic in
nature. The soils are classified as (i) Old Alluvial soils (Alfisols), (ii) Old Alluvial Soils
(Inceptisols) and (iii) New Alluvial Soils (Entisols), Alfisols along the foothills in the
northern side of the zone are rich in organic matter with low to medium potash being
covered by forest vegetation and tea plantation in patches. It has higher potential on the
southern side of the belt. Inceptisols are newer than the foothill soils and lye in the middle
plains of old flood plain valley of the zone. Soil texture ranges from sandy loam-to-loam,
silty clay loam, silty clay and clay. The soils are silt in organic mater and acidic in nature.
These soils are used extensively for cultivation of ahu rice and sali rice. Entisols are
distributed along the riverine tract of the Brahmaputra and its major tributaries. The
texture of the soil is course with sandy-to-sandy loam near the rivers and sandy loam to
loam from the active river belt. The low-lying riverine tracts are poorly drained. The soil
is rich in organic matter. The zone is suitable for ahu, sali and bao rice as well as jute.
Crops like rapeseeds and mustard, wheat, pea and other pulses are also grown in the lowlying
areas.
Climate
The climate of the zone is sub-tropical humid characterized by high rainfall, which
varies from 1500mm in western part to 3400mm in north-eastern part of the zone. The
distribution of rainfall in the zone is quite uneven. As a result the crops grown in the zone
suffer from water stress condition in some months and without irrigation the productivity
is also affected. The temperature varies from 22’C to 35oC with a mean relative humidity
of 81 per cent.
Land Use Pattern
The gross cropped area of the zone is 49.60 per cent of total geographical area and
permanent pasture and grazing, miscellaneous trees and grooves and total fallow land
consist of 3.14, 2.86 and 1.35 per cent respectively. Cultivable wasteland is 4.30 per cent
while 39 per cent of total cropped area is double cropped.
North Bank Plain zone has eight agro-ecological situations, viz., (i) Medium land
with Medium Rainfall (ii) Medium Land with High Rainfall (iii) Low Land Situation with
Lower elevation (iv) Deep water situation with Lower Elevation, (v) riverine Situation
with Lower Elevation, (vi) Upland with Medium Rainfall, (vii) Upland with High Rainfall
and (viii) Foot Hill Situation with Higher Elevation.
Except rainfall, the characteristics of the first two situations are almost same. In
situation (i) Cropping intensity varies from 156 to 172 per cent when it is 142 per cent in
situation (ii). The common crops grown are cereals, pulses, oilseeds, jute, sugarcane,
sesamum etc. The plantation crops are banana, pineapple, citrus fruits and papaya. In the
low land situation, the soil texture is loam, silty loam, clay loam and clay. The soil
remains submerged for about 4 months. Rice is the main crop and the other crops are
wheat, pulses, jute, vegetables and spices. The cropping intensity ranges between 126 to
146 per cent. The situation is suitable for rice cum fish culture. The Deep-water situation
is rich with organic matter and the soil texture varies from sandy loam to clay loam with
medium rainfall.
Deep-water rice is the dominating crop followed by ahu and boro rice. Other crops
are rapeseed and mustard, pulses, wheat, vegetables and jute. The average cropping
intensity varies from 118 to 130 per cent and the situation is suitable for rice cum fish
culture. Situation (v) is spread over 74,680 hectares formed in the recent flood plain of
river Brahmaputra and its tributaries known as Char land. The new alluvial soil is formed
by sandy loam to silty loam texture. In this situation also rice is the dominant crop followed
by rapeseeds, pulses, wheat, potato, vegetables, spices, groundnut, niger. Deep-water rice is
more dominating. Cropping intensity varies from 110 to 162 per cent. In the situation (vi)
and (vii) the soil textures are mostly sandy loam, silty loam, silty clay and clay. Upland
crops occupy relatively more area. Other crops are oilseeds, pulses, wheat, potato,
vegetables, spices, maize and other minor crops. Horticultural plantation crops are coconut,
Assam lemon, banana, pineapple and papaya. In situation (vii) banana and agro-forestry
cover a sizeable area. The cropping intensity in the medium rainfall situation is higher
(152%) than the high rainfall situation (127%). In the Foothill situation, the soils are mostly
alluvial in nature with medium texture comprising sandy loam to clay loam with medium
rainfall. Rice is the main crop followed by potato, maize, vegetables, oilseeds, pulses,
castor and major spices. Agro-forestry is also prominent while horticultural plantation
crops like banana and pineapple are more potential crops in this situation.
Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone
The Upper Brahmaputra Valley zone occupies an area of 16,079 sq. km, which is
endowed with natural resources. This zone is rich in tea gardens.
The zone is situated between hills and rivers and it is divided into four
physiographical tracts, viz. Hills, High Land area, Plain Land and Char Land.
Soils
The soils of the zone consist of most recent immature alluvium in char area to
mature ultisol in piedmont, high land and hill areas in the southern side. The soil texture is
sandy loam, silty loam and loamy sand. The texture of the surface soil ranges from sandy
loam, silty loam, silty clay and clayey. The soils of the foothills and upland are built up of
alluvial materials. Texture varies from clay loam, silty clay to clayey.
Climate
The zone receives an average rainfall of 2050 mm with varying intensities in
different districts. Temperature ranges between 70o C to 37o C during the year. The
average relative humidity is as high as 80 per cent in summer and 60 per cent in winter.
Land use pattern
Out of total geographical area of the zone, 26.50 per cent is under forest; total
cultivable land is 19.67 per cent, which is more in Dibrugarh and Jorhat districts. Fallow
land is about 4.80 per cent and the area under miscellaneous crops is 5.87 per cent. The
zone has 4.25 per cent of cultivable wasteland. It has 509672 hectares of net sown area
with the average cropping intensity of 124 per cent.
Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone can be delineated into eight agro-ecological
situations based on its physiography, climate, soil, and flood proneness, socio-economic
conditions and cropping pattern. They are (i) Humid Alluvial Flood Free, (ii) Sub-Humid
Alluvial Flood Free,(iii) Humid Alluvial Flood Prone, (iv) High land, (v) Hill Areas, (vi)
Forest Areas, (vii) Tea Growing Areas and (viii) Char areas. In the first three situations,
rainfall and soil texture is almost unique. Soil is alluvial rich in organic matter and the
texture is sandy loam, loamy sand and loam. Clayey soil is found in situation (ii). Rice is
the predominating crop followed by vegetables, pulses, rapeseed and mustard and wheat
and these are the important crops grown in these three situations. Cultivation of boro and
bao rice is a common practice in situation (iii). Arecanut, pineapple, betelvine are the
important horticultural crops in situation (i). In situation (iv), soil is alluvial in nature and
the texture is mostly deep clay, clay loam, loam and sandy loam. Area under field crops is
quite negligible and perennial crops and tea cover the sizeable area. In the low lying areas
rice is grown while on the slope of the high land, maize, sugarcane, rape and mustard,
potato and vegetables are grown. Citrus groves are also common in this situation.
Situation (v) is stretching along south of Golaghat to Margherita in the foothills of
Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh. Forests and cultivable wasteland cover the area. The
common crops are ahu rice, rapeseeds and mustard, potato, maize, vegetables, pineapple,
millets etc. In the Forest Area situation, land mass in high, soil is red laterite type with the
texture of loam, loamy sand or clay loam having medium rainfall, direct seeded rice,
vegetables, rape and mustard, sesamum and potato are grown. The situation is congenial
for keeping livestock. The tea growing areas are physiographically located in the high land
tillas in rolling plain and hillocks having natural drainage. Most of the soils are deep,
clayey reddish, with the texture of loam and sandy loam receiving medium rainfall. Tea is
the main crop and rice is also cultivated in the nullah and hollas. Vegetables and maize are
also grown in some areas. The Char area situation (viii) is susceptible to regular flood. It
is rich in organic matter with sandy loam texture of soil receiving medium rainfall. In this
situation rabi crops are more important. Crops like rapeseeds and mustard, pulses, what,
potato, vegetables and spices are widely grown during rabi season.
Hills Zone
The zone comprises of two districts, viz. Karbi Anglong and North Cachar hills.
Nagaon and Golaghat districts bound this zone on the North, Karimjanj district on the
south, Golaghat district, Nagaland and Manipur on the east and Meghalaya on the West.
Topography of the zone is blended with both hills and plains and the zone is
delineated into three district geographical units viz. (i) plains, (ii) Hills with gentle slope
and (iii) Hills with steep slope.
Soils and Climate
The hill slopes of the zone have red loamy soils and old alluvial soils cover the
plains of Karbi Anglong district. The soils are categorized into ferruginous and laterised
red soils which are red to reddish brown/deep reddish brown in colour. Due to varying
altitudes and location of hill valleys, temperature remains high during summer and mild in
winter.
Land use pattern
Practically the zone has no cadastral survey for land classification. This zone has
68.18 per cent of barren and uncultivable land while forest occupies 22.12 per cent and net
sown area is only 9.70 per cent of the total geographical area. Only 2.47 per cent in the
area is sown more than once.
Agro-ecological situation
Based on physiography, climate, soil, topography and cropping pattern, the zone
has been delineated into ten agro-ecological situations, viz. (i) High Hills High Rainfall,
(ii) High Hills Medium Rainfall, (iii) High Hills Low rainfall, (iv) Medium Hills High
Rainfall (v) Medium Hills Medium Rainfall (vi) Medium Hills Low Rainfall (vii) Low
Hills Medium Rainfall (viii) Foot Hills and Plains with High Rainfall (ix) Foot Hills and
Plains with Medium Rainfall and (x) Foot Hills and Plains with Low Rainfall. In the first
three situations, cropping pattern is almost same. The principal crops grown are rice,
mustard, maize, sugarcane, black gram, horticultural crops like pineapple, orange, citrus,
papaya, pears, jute etc. ginger, turmeric, betelvine and spices with medium and low
rainfall situations. Shifting cultivation is generally practiced. Similarly in situations (iv),
(v),(vi) and (vii), medium hills situations, the common crops are rice, maize, sesamum,
sugarcane, mustard, cotton, pulses, pears, pineapple, orange, ginger, rabi and kharif
vegetables. However, situation (iv) specially grown orange and pineapple, while
pineapple, orange, colocasia and tuber crops are important crops in situation (v). Orange
production, tea and rubber are the important potential crops in situation (vi) and (vii). In
the Foot Hills Zone, cereals, pulses, oilseeds, cotton, spices and condiments, citrus lime,
lemon, coconut, arecanut, betelvine are grown in situation (viii) while rice and vegetable
production is rich in situation (ix). It has been observed that distribution of rainfall has
some impact in cropping pattern of the zone.
Existing adoption of farming practices
The farmers in Assam follow both settled and shifting types of farm practices.
Every farm household follows an integrated mixed farming system where they grown
crops, rear livestock and fish and in addition to homestead gardening and farm forestry.
The common livestock enterprises are cattle, goat, pigs, poultry and duck. The rural
households also rear pigeons. Pigs and poultry are not the common enterprises in the rural
areas of Assam due to religious restrictions. In some areas in the riverine tract, sheep are
also reared. Under farm forestry, bamboo, wood tree (Kathani) for fuel and domestic
woods, thatch (kherani) are also found in the rural farm households of Assam. Gradual
decline of grazing land as common resources, cattle are generally stall-fed and graze freely
after crop season. Farmers are generally subsistence in nature with low pace of
mechanization. The state grows almost all types of fruits and vegetables in the homestead.
Banana, pineapple, and oranges are commercially grown under uplands situation in many
parts of the state. In the hills of Karbi Anglong, shifting cultivation is also practiced, in
which almost all crops like food, fodder and fuel are produced for their self-sustainability.
The farming practices vary from season to season. Climate, land topography, lands tenure
system, infrastructures available effect the farming practices. Farming is almost owner
operated. Contract farming has also been observed in several parts of the state.
CHAPTER - III
METHODOLOGY
The present exercise was based on series of farm level studies conducted in
different agro-climatic zones of Assam from 1988 to 1998 in the Department of
Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat as
non-project faculty research and Post Graduate research. Of course there have been more
than one study in the area of farming system research in some of the same agro-climatic
zone. This has helped not only gathering more information and further authenticating the
results but also helped in understanding the system in vogue in specific areas like char.
Sampling
In total seven studies completed in the area of farming system research in the
Department of Agricultural Economics was used in this exercise. In all the studies a
multistage stratified sampling technique was used to draw the ultimate unit of sample
farmers. It may be noted here that the Barak Valley Zone of the state could not be
included in this exercise due to lack of information on this zone for the time being. Details
of the sampling frame is as shown below
Table 2.1 Distribution of Sample Farm Households by Size Categories and Agro-
Climatic Zones of Assam
Agro-climatic Zone Farm Size
Small Medium Large Total
Lower Brahmaputra 37 28 19 84
Valley Zone) (LBVZ)
Central Brahmaputra 64 39 36 131
Valley Zone (CBVZ)
North Bank Plain 104 60 45 209
Zone (NBPZ)
Upper Brahmaputra 90 62 40 192
Valley Zone (UBVZ) 97 58 55 210
Hills Zone (HZ)
Char Areas* 103 57 50 210
*It is not a zone but constitute specific agro-ecological situation (LBVZ)
Data and Analysis
Primary data generated from the sampled farmers on resource availability, existing
cropping pattern, rearing of animal activities, output of different enterprises, prices of
input and output, expenditures on purchased seed, fertiliser, manure, pesticide, minimum
and maximum area put on certain enterprises, availability and utilisation of human and
bullock labour etc. have been utilised in the present exercise.
Analytical Procedure
Simple tabular analysis was done to present result of the present exercise. For
identification of the existing farming system in different size group of farm in different
agro-climatic zones, activities included by each respondent in different seasons have been
carefully recorded. Cost and return of different activities across different size group of
farms have been worked out. A system was termed as a major one if 10 per cent or more
farmers in a particular size category adopt and carried out a system. Availability and
utilisation of resources have been worked out for all the identified system in each size
group. Detail composition of the identified system has been worked out component wise
and proportion of capital invested, human labour employment generated, and net return
earned under each component has also been computed to see the relative importance of
each component of the system.
CHAPTER - IV
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The result of the present exercise is presented under the following heads.
(a) Agro-climatic zone wise identification of existing farming system
(b) Composition of the major identified farming system
(c) Relative share of the Components in capital investment, employment generation and
net returns in the major identified system
Agro-Climatic Zone Wise Identification of Existing Farming System
Aggregation of relevant data of sampled farm households across different size
group of farms in different agro-climatic zone of Assam has resulted in identifying the
prevailing farming systems in the state. Table 4.1 shows the detail of the identified
framing system in the state under different size categories of farm. The present exercise
has identified as many as 43 farming systems in the state being practised by farmers.
These systems have been identified based on selected sample of 666 farmers across size
groups and agro climatic zones of the state. However, the numbers of farming systems
practised by different size group of farms vary within and between the agro-climatic
zones. The basic difference in the system lies in the inclusion or deletion of one or more
animal activities. Nevertheless, variation in crop acreage and types must be there in
different systems but such variations are not very wide.
Table 4.1 reveals that North Bank Plain Zone has the highest number of systems
followed by Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone. In the Hills Zone actually difference exists
in the composition of agricultural and horticultural crops but in the composition of animal
activities virtually there is no difference. Most of the farm household rear pigs, dairy, and
maintain few poultry birds. However, due to lack of adequate information different
systems based on variation of crop activities has not been attempted in the Hills Zone.
Households in Different Agro- Climatic Zones of Assam According to Farming System(s)
Practiced
Agro - climatic Zones
Col.2 Col.3 Col.4 Col.5 Col.6 Col.7 Col.8 Col.9 Col.10 Col.11 Col.12 Col.13 Col.14 Col.15
Col.16 Col.17 Col.18 Col.19
LBVZ CBVZ NBPZ UBVZ HILL Z CHAR
Small Med Large Small Med Large Small Med Large Small Med Large Small Med Large Small
Med Large
Duck 1 2 1 4 2 2 16 9 5
(3.03) (9.09) (9.09) (7.40) (7.40) (9.09) (18.18) (21.43) (20.00)
6414
(27.27) (36.36) (1.85) (4.54)
2211165
(6.06) (9.09) (1.85) (3.70) (4.54) (6.81) (7.25)
111541
(3.03) (9.09) (1.14) (11.90) (9.52) (1.45)
1311442
(3.03) (5.55) (3.70) (4.54) (4.54) (5.88) (4.76)
Duck 8 1 1 28 16 10 1 1
(24.24) (4.54) (9.09) (41.18) (38.09) (71.43) (4.76) (8.33)
2214112
(6.06) (3.70) (3.70) (4.54) (2.38) (1.45) (9.52)
2 1 25 16 12 1 3 40 9 1
(6.06) (9.09) (46.29) (59.25) (54.54) (1.14) (7.14) (57.97) (42.86) (8.33)
321321134
(9.09) (9.09) (9.09) (5.55) (7.40) (4.54) (1.14) (7.14) (16.00)
321141
(9.09) (3.70) (3.70) (4.54) (9.52) (4.00)
13 1
(14.77) (2.38)
2 2 1 14 9 8 5 2
(6.06) (9.09) (9.09) (15.91) (21.43) (32.00) (7.35) (4.76)
2213
(6.06) (3.70) (3.70) (3.41)
134431
(4.54) (5.55) (4.55) (5.88) (7.14) (7.14)
2321421
(9.09) (5.55) (2.27) (2.38) (5.88) (4.76) (7.14)
Med Large
Fishery 1 1 1 1 1
(4.54) (3.70) (4.54) (2.38) (4.00)
21111
(9.09) (9.09) (1.14) (2.38) (4.00)
212
(6.06) (1.85) (4.76)
2 2 28 23
(6.06) (9.09) (100.00) (100.00)
112
(4.54) (1.14) (4.76)
116
(3.03) (1.85) (6.82)
5
(20.00)
13117
(3.03) (5.55) (3.70) (4.54) (7.95)
Fishery+Pig 7 5 1
(10.29) (11.90) (7.14)
Fishery 4 1
(5.88) (7.14)
61111
(8.82) (2.38) (1.45) (4.76) (8.33)
Pigeon+Pig 6
(8.82)
Pig 2 69
(4.76) (100.00)
Duck+Pig 1
(2.38)
Pigeon 1
(8.33)
22
(2.90) (9.52)
Med Large
Duck+Pigeon 1
(4.76)
Duck 1
(4.76)
1
(4.76)
2
(2.90)
2
(2.90)
6
1
1
(4.76)
211
(2.90) (4.76) (8.33)
211
(2.90) (4.76) (8.33)
4
(5.80)
Poultry 6
(50.00)
33 22 11 54 27 22 88 42 25 68 38 14 69 28 23 69 21 12
percentage of total farm households pracising a particular system
parentheses indicate the major farming system
Among size group of farms highest number of system was found to have practised by small
farms (17) in
NBPZ followed by (15) LBVZ. In the case of Medium farms also highest number of (13)
farming system
was in NBPZ followed by (11) LBVZ.
Out of the prevailing systems in different agro-climatic zones by various size groups of farms
only
few among them could be considered as major systems. A system practised by 10 per cent or
more farm
households in any size category in any agro-climatic zone was considered in this exercise as
major farming
system. Except in NBPZ and UBVZ number of major farming system in other agro-climatic
zone in
different size category of farms was only one. However, if the percentage of farms practising a
system is
considered between 5 to 9 per cent, the number of major system would have been more in each
case. The
large size group of farms in the NBPZ recorded maximum 4 number of major systems followed
by small
and medium farms of the same zone with 3 major system each. Each of the small and medium
size group
of farms in the UBVZ has showed 2 major systems. Among the major systems identified crop +
dairy cow
+ poultry (FS8) was the most popular system as it was practised by small, medium and large
farms in
CBVZ and small and medium farms of Char areas of LBVZ. In this context it may be mentioned
that
there are other systems, which are common to different size group of farms in different agro-
climatic
zones, but those systems have not emerged as major system.
Composition of the Major Identified Farming System
Details of the major farming systems in different agro-climatic zone of Assam according to size
group of farms are shown in Table 4.2.1 through 4.2.6. The table revealed that crop component
of the
major system is dominated by rice in all the agro-climatic zones of the state irrespective of size
of farms.
Among rice, sali rice appeared as the most important crop in respect of coverage of area in all
the size of
farms in the state. The cropping intensity varied between size groups, type of farming systems
and agroclimatic
zones depending on the nature and composition of the system. The cropping intensity in all the
plain agro-climatic zones of the state was substantially higher than the hill zone. The intensity of
cropping
among the sampled farms in all the size groups was found to be higher than the average cropping
intensity
in respective zones and the state as a whole. This could be on account of inclusion of area under
the
vegetables in the kitchen garden area of the sampled households. In most of the identified
systems in all
the agro-climatic zones dairy cow was found to be a common animal activity. It has also been
observed
Table 4.2.1
Details of the Major Farming Systems in Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone According to Farm Size
FS6 FS2 FS2
Particulars of the System Unit Small Medium Large
Crops
Local ahu rice Ha 1.251 1.717 2.369
(39.46) (39.43) (33.00)
HYV ahu rice Ha 0.101 0.187
(2.320 (2.60)
Jute Ha 0.032
(0.73)
Black gram Ha 0.099 0.119
(3.12) (1.65)
Boro rice Ha 0.066
(1.52)
Maize Ha 0.66
(0.92)
Local sali rice Ha 0.733 0.93 1.88
(23.12) (21.36) (26.88)
HYV sali rice Ha 0.689 1.233 1.99
(28.73) (28.32) (27.72)
Sesamum Ha 0.099
(2.27)
Wheat Ha 0.33 0.09 0.33
(10.41) (2.06) (4.59)
Mustard Ha 0.05 0.044 0.04
(1.58) (1.010 (0.55)
Potato Ha 0.03 0.029
(0.68) (0.40)
Sugarcane Ha 0.006 0.011 0.132
(0.189) (0.25) (1.84)
Niger Ha 0.0177 0.035
(0.56) (0.48)
Gross cropped area Ha 3.1697 4.353 7.177
(100.00) (100.00) (100.00)
Cropping Intensity Per cent 175.12 170.71 160.31
Animals
Dairy cow No. 2 3 4
Goat No. 3 4 3
Poultry No. 8
Duck No. 6 8 10
Figures in parentheses indicate percentage
Table 4.2.2 Details of the Major Farming System in Central
Brahmaputra Valley Zone of Assam According to Farm Size
Particulars FS8 FS8 FS8
of The System Unit Small Medium Large
Crops
Local ahu rice Ha 0.32 0.55 0.76
(16.26) (15.85) (13.01)
HYV ahu rice Ha 0.202 0.285 0.493
(10.26) (8.21) (8.44)
Jute Ha 0.08 0.216 0.4
(4.06) (6.22) (6.85)
Taro Ha 0.062 0.07 0.126
(3.15) (2.01) (2.15)
Boro rice Ha 0.025 0.159
(.72) (2.72)
Summer Moong Ha 0.076 0.088 0.126
(3.81) (2.53) (2.15)
Local sali rice Ha 0.306 0.8 1.29
(15.54) (23.05) (22.09)
HYV sali rice Ha 0.19 0.205 0.346
(9.65) (5.90) (5.92)
Sesamum Ha 0.053 0.061 0.119
(2.70) (1.75) (2.10)
Wheat Ha 0.123 0.145 0.226
(6.25) (4.17) (3.87)
Mustard Ha 0.085 0.255 0.4
(4.31) (7.34) (6.850
Potato Ha 0.079 0.131 0.2
(4.01) (3.77) (3.42)
Tomato Ha 0.05 0.1 0.179
(2.540 (2.880 (3.06)
Brinjal Ha 0.055 0.065 0.093
(2.79) (1.87) (1.590
Lentil Ha 0.044 0.09 0.179
(2.23) (2.59) (3.06)
Field pea Ha 0.053 0.08 0.166
(2.70) (2.30) (2.84)
Black gram Ha 0.053 0.107 0.159
(2.70) (3.08) (2.72)
Khesari Ha 0.05 0.08 0.266
(2.55) (2.30) (4.56)
Niger Ha 0.033 0.039 0.013
(1.67) (1.12) (.22)
Tichi Ha 0.054 0.078 0.139
(2.74) (2.24) (2.38)
(100.00) (100.00) (100.00)
Cropping Intensity Per cent 141.9 143 162.8
Animal
Dairy cow No. 2 4 6
Poultry No. 25 25 50
Figure in parentheses indicate percentage of gross
cropped area
Table 4.2.3 Details of the Major Farming Systems in North Bank Plain Zone of Assam
According to Farm Size
Particulars Small Medium Large
of the System Unit FS1 FS11 FS12 FS1 FS4 FS12 FS1 FS9 FS12 FS22
Crops
Local ahu rice Ha 0.187 0.181 0.267 0.441 0.225 0.366 0.3 0.635
(10.43) (12.28) (10.06) (15.87) (5.52) (8.73) (6.70) (13.49)
HYV ahu rice Ha 0.201 0.217 0.195 0.4 0.225 0.433 0.366
(11.21) (13.26) (7.35) (14.07) (8.10) (10.62) (8.17)
Local sali rice Ha 0.626 0.535 0.6 0.802 0.719 0.702 0.71 1 1.6 1.265
(34.91) (36.30) (36.95) (30.23) (25.30) (25.27) (17.41) (23.85) (35.71) (31.89)
HYV sali rice Ha 0.321 0.251 0.16 0.444 0.625 0.35 1.4 0.82 0.911 0.98
(17.90) (17.03) (9.85) (16.74) (21.99) (12.60) (32.32) (19.56) (20.33) (24.70)
Rape & mustard Ha 0.107 0.108 0.118 0.133 0.24 0.26 0.3 0.366 0.2 0.366
(5.87) (7.33) (7.27) (5.01) (8.44) (9.26) (7.35) (8.73) (4.46) (9.23)
Sesamum Ha 0.053 0.058 0.079 0.075 0.2 0.16
(2.96) (3.93) (2.98) (2.64) (4.90) (3.57)
Jute Ha 0.04 0.075 0.105 0.065 0.133 0.225 0.133
(2.23) (4.62) (3.96) (1.59) (3.17) (5.02) (3.35)
Pulses Ha 0.08 0.1 0.166 0.233 0.19 0.17 0.233 0.18 0.333
(4.46) (6.76) (6.26) (8.20) (6.84) (4.17) (5.56) (4.02) (8.39)
Maize Ha 0.213 0.09 0.04
(13.12) (3.24) (0.89)
Wheat Ha 0.04 0.083 0.167 0.175 0.133
(2.23) (5.11) (6.29) (6.30) (2.97)
Sugarcane Ha 0.108 0.04 0.026 0.13 0.266 0.14
(7.33) (2.46) (0.98) (4.68) (6.52) (3.13)
Summer vegetables Ha 0.026 0.05 0.028 0.089 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.03 0.075 0.04
(1.45) (3.39) (1.72) (3.35) (1.41) (2.52) (2.21) (0.70) (1.67) (1.01)
Rabi vegetables Ha 0.112 0.05 0.058 0.11 0.07 0.095 0.125 0.025 0.09 0.035
(6.25) (3.39) (3.57) (4.15) (2.46) (3.42) (3.06) (0.59) (2.01) (0.88)
Potato Ha 0.033 0.032 0.07 0.08 0.05 0.095 0.02 0.06 0.02
(2.24) (1.97) (2.64) (2.81) (1.80) (2.33) (0.45) (1.34) (0.50)
Bao rice 0.666
(15.89)
Boro rice 0.533
(12.71)
Linseed 0.26
(6.55)
Gross cropped area Ha 1.793 1.474 1.624 2.653 2.842 2.778 4.079 4.192 4.48 3.967
(100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00)
Cropping Intensity Per cent 165.7 139.1 157 150 136 151 132 130 137 129
Animals
Dairy cow No. 1 2 2 2 3 1 4 3 2 3
Goat No. 4 5 4 3
Pigeon No. 6 8 8 6 6 6 8
Duck No. 5 6 6 8 8 4 6
Fishery Ha 0.08 0.04
Poultry No. 12
Figure in parentheses indicate percentage of gross cropped area
Table 4.2.4 Details of the Major Farming Systems in Upper
Brahmaputra Valley Zone of Assam According to Farm Size
of the System Unit FS24 FS32 FS24 Fs32 FS32
Crops
Local ahu rice Ha 0.2 0.366 0.3 0.343
(17.36) (16.24) (8.22) (9.76) (9.48)
HYV ahu rice Ha 0.16 0.144 0.25 0.239
(13.88) (5.06) (6.85) (6.8) (10.74)
Local sali rice Ha 0.22 0.566 1.4 0.839
(19.09) (25.11) (38.37) (23.87) (22.60)
HYV sali rice Ha 0.3 0.334 1.07 0.546
(26.04) (14.82) (29.33) (15.53) (21.10)
Jute Ha 0.011 0.079
(0.49) (2.25) (1.88)
Sesamum Ha 0.022 0.066
(0.98) (1.88) (1.18)
Sugarcane Ha 0.196 0.464
(8.69) (13.20) (9.23)
Mustard Ha 0.165 0.23 0.182
(7.32) (6.3) (5.180 (5.26)
Blackgram Ha 0.03 0.039 0.076
(2.60) (1.73) (2.16) (3.34)
Wheat Ha 0.04 0.125
(1.78) (3.56) (3.83)
Potato Ha 0.14 0.122 0.11
(12.15) (5.41) (3.12) (1.37)
Field pea Ha 0.083 0.1 0.168
(3.68) (2.74) (4.78) (3.32)
Summer vegetables Ha 0.048 0.096 0.149 0.128
(4.15) (4.26) (4.08) (3.64) (2.75)
Rabi vegetables Ha 0.038 0.085 0.099 0.129
(3.29) (3.77) (2.71) (3.67) (3.31)
Tomato Ha 0.005 0.007
(0.22) (0.20) (0.20)
Brinjal Ha 0.01 0.014
(0.44) (0.40) (0.39)
Summer pulse 0.016 0.05
(1.38) (1.37)
Gross cropped area Ha 1.152 2.254 3.648 3.515
(100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00)
Cropping intensity Per cent 208 153 152 139
Animals
Dairy cow No. 3 3 3 4
Goat No. 3 4
Poultry No. 4 12
Duck No. 2 3
Pigeon No. 4 6 4 10
Pig No. 1 3
Fish Ha 0.06 0.15
Figure in parentheses indicate percentage of gross cropped area
Table 4.2.5 Details of the Major Farming Systems
in Hills Zone of Assam According to Farm Size
of the System Unit FS28 FS19 FS19
Crops
Sali rice (settled) Ha 0.376 0.87 1.301
(43.62) (64.25) (77.44)
Sali rice (jhum) Ha 0.17 0.14 0.07
(19.72) (10.34) (4.17)
Jhum mixed crop Ha 0.077 0.073 0.085
(8.93) (5.39) (5.08)
Ginger Ha 0.108 0.108 0.093
(12.53) (7.98) (5.53)
Turmeric Ha 0.033 0.025 0.012
(3.83) (1.85) (0.71)
Colocasia Ha 0.03 0.044 0.029
(3.48) (3.25) (1.73)
Rabi vegetables Ha 0.033 0.048 0.049
(3.83) (3.54) (2.44)
Summer vegetables Ha 0.035 0.045 0.041
(4.06) (3.32) (2.44)
(100.00) (100.00) (100.00)
Cropping intensity Per cent 103.6 103 102
Animals
Dairy cow No. 8 7 7
Poultry No. 5 10 10
Goat No. 2
Pig No. 4 8 12
cropped area
Table 4.2.6 Details of the Major Farming Systems
in Char Areas of Assam According to Farm Size
of the System Unit FS8 FS8 FS43
Crops
Ahu rice Ha 0.533 1.422 2.333
(47.07) ((33.47) (33.21)
Jute Ha 0.02 0.584 0.867
(2.51) (13.75) (12.34)
Millet Ha 0.021 0.111 0.25
(1.82) (2.61) (4.60)
Pumpkin Ha 0.002 0.004 0.007
(0.17) (0.09) (.10)
Sali rice Ha 0.046
(3.98)
Wheat Ha 0.008 0.689 1.483
(0.69) (16.22) (21.11)
Mustard Ha 0.258 0.589 0.683
(22.30) (13.87) (9.72)
Potato Ha 0.029 0.211 0.167
(2.51) (4.97) (2.38)
Black gram Ha 0.098 0.311 0.484
(8.47) (7.12) (6.89)
Lentil Ha 0.008 0.111 0.284
(0.69) (2.61) (4.04)
Lathyrus Ha 0.017 0.045 0.15
(1.47) (1.06) (2.14)
Niger Ha 0.005 0.056 0.117
(0.43) (1.12) (1.67)
Linseed Ha 0.025
(0.36)
Brinjal Ha 0.003 0.054 0.032
(0.26) (1.27) (0.46)
Chilli Ha 0.005 0.017 0.042
(0.43) (0.40) (0.60)
Onion Ha 0.006 0.049 0.117
(0.52) (0.92) (1.67)
Coriander Ha 0.001 0.006 0.037
(0.09) (0.14) (0.53)
Sweet potato Ha 0.006 0.008
(0.52) (0.11)
Gross crooped area Ha 1.157 4.248 7.025
(100.00) (100.00) (100.00)
Cropping intensity Per cent 188 179 191
Animals
Dairy cow No. 3 4 8
Goat No. 2
Sheep No. 1
Poultry No. 4 6 9
cropped area
that fish and pig as animal activity appeared only in few major systems. Religious taboos must
have played
important role in inclusion or deletion of these activities in the system. However, pig has
emerged as an
important activity in all the major systems in the hill zone and only in two major systems in
UBVZ.
The composition of activities in the homestead under the major identified system is shown in
Table
4.3.1 to 4.3.2. The share of homestead area under the head fruits and other plantation crops,
homestead
vegetables and fishery is shown under different farming systems. The fruits and other plantation
crops
included fruit trees, coconut, arecanut, and beetle vine (creeper), banana, and papaya. The area
under these
crops varied from as high as 0.132 ha in FS12 in NBPZ to as low as 0.021 ha in FS32 in UBVZ
in the case
of small farms. Among the medium size group of farms highest area under fruits and plantation
crops was
recorded to be 0.29 ha in FS4 in NBPZ and the least 0. 029 ha in FS32 in UBVZ. In the case of
large size
of farms FS1 in NBPZ showed the highest area of 0.5 ha against the lowest area of 0.034 ha
under FS24 in
the CBVZ. Vegetable crops mostly included tomato, brinjal, potato, summer vegetables, and
winter
vegetables. Its area varied between 0.196 ha in FS32 in UBVZ to 0.028 ha in FS11 in NBPZ for
small
farms; 0.278 ha in FS32 in UBVZ to 0.139 ha in FS8 in CBVZ for medium farms and 0.34 ha in
FS32 in
UBVZ to 0.075 ha in FS9 in NBPZ for large farms respectively. Homestead fishery was found
only in the
large farms in the LBVZ (0.062 ha) in FS2 and in FS9 and FS22 in NBPZ (0.08 and 0.04 ha)
respectively.
Relative Share of the Components in Capital Investment, Employment
Generation
and Net Returns in the Major Identified System
Relative share of the components of the system for capital investment, employment of labour and
net returns is shown in Table 4.4.1 to 4.7.3. However, these results could be incorporated only
for LBVZ,
CBVZ, NBPZ and UBVZ. Information on these aspects for HZ and BVZ could not be provided
due to lack
of adequate information. The results is presented and discussed according to zones.
Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone (LBVZ)
Of the total net return generated in FS6 in the case of small farms maximum share was from the
field crops (44.96 per cent) followed by homestead (33.95 per cent) while the contribution of the
animal
component was recorded to be only 21.09 per cent. But percentage share of working capital
investment in
Table 4.3.1 Composition of Homestead Farming in Different Agro-Climatic Zones of Assam
LBV Zone CBV Zone UBV Zone
Particulars Unit Small Medium Large Small Medium Large Small Medium Large
FS6 FS2 FS2 FS8 FS8 FS8 FS24 FS32 FS24 FS32 FS32
(a)Fruits & other
plantation crops Ha 0.028 0.038 0.048 0.05 0.093 0.113 0.034 0.021 0.083 0.029 0.042
Fruit trees$ Ha 0.009 0.014 0.017 0.022 0.039 0.045 0.005 0.006 0.006
Coconut Ha 0.005 0.006 0.013 0.01 0.017 0.029 0.003 0.004 0.015
Arecanut Ha 0.013 0.015 0.015 0.007 0.013 0.019 0.012 0.017 0.018
Beetle vine(creeper)
Banana Ha 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.008 0.017 0.013 6E-04 0.001 0.002
Papaya Ha 4E-04 5E-04 7E-04 0.003 0.007 0.007 3E-04 4E-04 7E-04
(b)Homestead
vegetables Ha 0.173 0.235 0.214 0.078 0.139 0.199 0.086 0.196 0.248 0.278 0.34
Tomato Ha 0.008 0.018 0.023 0.005 0.007 0.01
Brinjal Ha 0.01 0.014 0.02
Potato Ha 0.033 0.045 0.041
Summer vegetables! Ha 0.058 0.083 0.074 0.039 0.07 0.095 0.048 0.096 0.149 0.128 0.14
Winter vegetables* Ha 0.082 0.107 0.099 0.031 0.051 0.081 0.038 0.085 0.099 0.129 0.17
©Homestead Fishery Ha 0.062
Total homestead
Area Ha 0.201 0.273 0.324 0.128 0.232 0.312 0.12 0.217 0.331 0.307 0.382
Table 4.3.2 Composition of Homestead Farming in North Bank Plains Zone of Assam
North Bank Plains Zone
Particulars Unit Small Medium Large
FS1 FS11 FS12 FS1 FS4 FS12 FS1 FS9 FS12 FS22
(a)Fruits & other
plantation crops Ha 0.129 0.133 0.132 0.274 0.29 0.245 0.5 0.378 0.495 0.322
Fruit trees$ Ha
Coconut Ha
Areca nut Ha
Beetle vine Ha
Banana Ha
Papaya Ha
Fuel wood Ha 0.029 0.028 0.034 0.053 0.09 0.045 0.199 0.098 0.173 0.065
(b)Homestead
Vegetables Ha 0.14 0.133 0.118 0.269 0.19 0.215 0.31 0.075 0.225 0.135
Tomato Ha
Brinjal Ha
Potato Ha 0.033 0.032 0.07 0.08 0.05 0.095 0.02 0.06 0.02
Summer vegetables! Ha 0.028 0.05 0.028 0.089 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.03 0.075 0.04
Winter vegetables* Ha 0.112 0.05 0.058 0.11 0.07 0.095 0.125 0.025 0.09 0.035
©Homestead Fishery Ha 0.08 0.04
Total Homestead
Area Ha 0.269 0.266 0.25 0.543 0.48 0 0.46 0.81 0.533 0.72 0.497
*Winter vegetables include cole crops, radish, carrot, chilli, onion, spinach, lai sak, corriander & others
! Summer vegetables include ladies finger, ridge gourd, pumpkin, cucumber, termeric, ginger & others
$Fruit trees include mango, goava, jack fruit, litchi, lemon & others
the system was noted to be maximum in field crops (58.15 per cent) followed by homestead with
30.79 per
cent and the animal activities with 11.05 per cent respectively. In the case of employment of
human labour
in the system bulk of employment was generated (83.48 per cent) in the cultivation of field crops
.The
percentage of employment generated in animal component and homestead was of the order of
7.54 and
8.98 per cent respectively.
FS2 was found to be a major as well as common system in both medium and large farms. The
percentage share of net return generated in this system was in the crop component with 43.08
and 51.01
per cent in the medium and large farms followed by 37.94 and 33.50 per cent in homestead.
Similar trend
in the share of capital investment and employment generation was observed in this system with
highest
share of investment and employment of labour in crops followed by homestead activities.
The present exercise thus revealed that in the Lower Brahmaputra Valley Zone crop and
homestead
has emerged as most important components of farming system since substantial share of net
returns was
earned from these components and they together contributed above 90 per cent of human labour
employment in the farm.
Central Brahmaputra Valley Zone (CBVZ)
In this zone the system FS8 has emerged as the major system in all the size group of farms. Share
of net returns was found to be maximum in the crop component followed by animal component
in all the
size group of farms. Relative share of net returns varied between 41.08 per cent in medium size
of farms to
56.50 per cent in large size group in crops and between 26.80 per cent in large farms to 30.98 per
cent in
medium farms in animal component and between 16.70 per cent in large farms to 19.95 per cent
in
medium farms in the case of homestead. In regard to working capital investment in the system
was concern
it was noted to be maximum in crops, which varied from as low as 79.22 per cent in large farms
to as high
as 83.93 per cent in small farms. In the case of homestead the working capital investment was
below 10
per cent irrespective of size of farms. Like the previous system maximum employment of human
labour
was also generated by crop component followed by animals and homestead.
Table 4.4.1 Relative Share of Various Components in Net Return in the Major Farming Systems in Lower
Brahmaputra
Components
Net Return (Rs.)
Small Medium Large
FS6 FS2 FS2
Field Crops
3049
44.96
3201
43.08
5350
51.01
Animals
1430
21.09
1410
18.98
1625
15.49
Homestead
2302
33.95
2819
37.94
3514
33.50
System Total
6781
100.00
7430
100.00
10489
100.00
Figures in italics indicates percentage of total
* Excludes summer and rabi vegetables and potato which are included in homestead
Table 4.4.2 Relative Share of Various Components in Working Capital in the Major Farming Systems in
Lower
Components
Working Capital (Rs.)
Small Medium Large
FS6 FS2 FS2
Field Crops
2236
58.15
2484
52.78
4053
49.68
Animals
425
11.05
697
14.81
1293
15.85
Homestead
1184
30.79
1525
32.41
2812
34.47
System Total
3845
100.00
4706
100.00
8158
100.00
* Excludes summer and rabi vegetables and potato which are included in homestead
Table 4.4.3 Relative Share of Various Components in Human Labour in the Major Farming Systems in
Lower
Components
Human Labour (Rs.)
Small Medium Large
FS6 FS2 FS2
Field Crops
465
83.48
549
81.70
964
83.90
Animals
50
8.98
73
10.86
123
10.70
Homestead
42
7.54
50
7.44
62
5.40
System Total
557
100.00
672
100.00
1149
100.00
• Excludes summer and rabi vegetables and potato which are included in homestead
44.96
21.09
33.95
43.08
18.98
37.94
51.01
15.49
33.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
FS6 FS2 FS2
Small Medium Large
Field Crops Animals Homestead
58.15
11.05
30.79
52.78
14.81
32.41
49.68
15.85
34.47
0
20
40
60
80
100
FS6 FS2 FS2
Small Medium Large
83.93
7.26
8.82
82.68
8.33
8.99
79.22
13.33
7.45
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
FS6 FS2 FS2
Small Medium Large
FIG 4.1 RELATIVE SHARE OF VARIOUS COMPONENTS IN THE MAJOR FAMING
SYSTEMS IN LOWER BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY ZONE OF ASSAM
Net
return
Working
capital
Human
labour
Table 4.5.1 Relative Share of Various Components in Net Return in the Major Farming Systems in Central
Components
Net Return (Rs.)
Small Medium Large
FS8 FS8 FS8
Field Crops
3770
51.55
6057
49.08
11264
56.50
Animals
2199
30.07
3823
30.98
5344
26.80
Homestead
1344
18.38
2462
19.95
3329
16.70
System Total
7313
100.00
12342
100.00
19937
100.00
* Excludes summer and rabi vegetables and tomato which are included in homestead
Central
Components
Small Medium Large
FS8 FS8 FS8
Field Crops
5065
83.93
8858
82.68
14218
79.22
Animals
438
7.26
892
8.33
2392
13.33
Homestead
532
8.82
963
8.99
1337
7.45
System Total
6035
100.00
10713
100.00
17947
100.00
* Excludes summer and rabi vegetables and tomato which are included in homestead
Central
Components
Human Labour (Rs.)
Small Medium Large
FS8 FS8 FS8
Field Crops
153
71.16
266
70.18
342
54.37
Animals
48
22.33
87
22.96
252
40.06
Homestead
14
6.51
26
6.86
35
5.56
System Total
557
100.00
672
100.00
1149
100.00
• Excludes summer and rabi vegetables and tomato which are included in homestead
51.55
30.07
18.38
49.08
30.98
19.95
56.50
26.80
16.70
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
FS8 FS8 FS8
Small Medium Large
83.93
7.26
8.82
82.68
8.33
8.99
79.22
13.33
7.45
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
FS8 FS8 FS8
Small Medium Large
71.16
22.33
6.51
70.18
22.96
6.86
54.37
40.06
5.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
FS8 FS8 FS8
Small Medium Large
SYSTEMS IN
CENTRAL BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY ZONE OF ASSAM
Net
return
Working
capital
Human
labour
In CBVZ undoubtedly crop component was found to be important. But it was also revealed that
with minimum investment in the homestead and animal activities it is possible to earn sizeable
amount of
net returns besides creating some employment avenues for the farm family labours.
North Bank Plain Zone (NBPZ)
In this zone FS1 and FS12 were found to be common systems in farms of all sizes. In addition to
these systems the small size group also had FS11, the medium farms FS4 and the large farms
FS9 and
FS22 as other major systems in the zone. The net returns generated in different systems revealed
crop as
the important component followed by either animals or homestead. The relative share of crop
varied from
54.77 per cent (FS11) in small farms to 68.98 per cent (FS12) in medium farms. In the case of
animals the
relative share of net returns ranged between 9.32 per cent (FS12) in large farms to 29.71 per cent
(FS!!) in
small farms. While in homestead it varied between as low as 14.14 per cent (FS12) in small
farms to as
high as 26.53 per cent (FS9) in large farms.
Relative share of working capital and employment of human labour revealed more or less similar
results like the other zones. The share of capital investment in crop component in different
systems was
found to be above 60 per cent in all the major systems identified in this zone. The working
capital
investment in animal component was noted to be between 9.14 per cent (FS12) in large farms to
minimum
27.26 per cent (FS11) in small farms while in the case of homestead it was found to be between
9.53 per
cent (FS12) in small farms to 25.74 per cent (FS9) in large farms respectively.
The crop component alone generated employment to the tune of 62.31 per cent (FS11) in small
farms to 78.20 per cent (FS12) in large farms. In the case of animals and homestead percentage
of
employment generated varied between 9.69 per cent (FS12) in large farms to 25.37 per cent
(FS11) in
small farms for animals and between 7.47 per cent (FS1) in small farms to 13.74 per cent (FS1)
in medium
farms for homestead respectively.
Like LBV and CBVZ the relative importance of different components in the identified farming
systems showed almost similar pattern. In each case baring few exceptions crop component
emerged as the
most important followed by either animals or homestead. But from the point of view of capital
investment
necessary in different systems homestead required comparatively lesser amount of capital but
generated
handsome net returns and employment opportunities.
Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone (UBVZ)
The system FS32 appeared as the major system for small, medium and large farms while FS24
was
found to be common in small and medium farms. In the case of FS24 relative share of animals
was found
to be maximum compared to crop and homestead. It was found to be as high as 65.34 per cent
(FS24) in
small farms to as low as 53.80 per cent (FS24) in medium farms. While in the case of FS32 crop
component contributed maximum net returns which varied from 49.45 per cent in small farms to
56.56 per
cent in large farms. Relative share of net returns in the homestead was found to be between 24.84
per cent
(FS24) in small farms to 36.06 per cent (FS32) also in small farms.
In the case of relative share of working capital in different farming systems in this zone, crop
component utilised maximum which ranged between 51 per cent (FS24) in medium farms to
74.66 per
cent (FS32) in small farms; followed by animals with 10.26 per cent (FS32) in small farms to
40.40 per
cent (FS24) also in small farms and in the homestead it was 1.95 per cent (FS24) in small farms
to 15.14
per cent (FS32) in large farms respectively.
Share of labour employment also was maximum in crops, which varied between 41.14 per cent
(FS24) in small farms to 69.40 per cent (FS32) also in small farms. In the case of animals, the
share of
employment generated varied between 19.30 per cent (FS32) in small farms to 53.51 per cent
(FS24) also
in small farms. Homestead generated between 5.35 per cent to 13.47 per cent employment in
FS24 and
FS32 in small and large farms respectively.
Unlike other agro-climatic zones, the relative shares of net returns, working capital and labour
employment in this zone was little different. This variation or difference might have occurred
because of
the composition of activities in the system. In some system fishery activity might have resulted
this
difference. Inclusion of fishery activity required little more investment but at the same time it
contributed
substantially towards the net returns of the farms.
Table 4.6.1 Relative share of Various Components in Net Return in the Major Farming
System in
North Bank Plain Zone of Assam
Net Return (Rs.)
Components
Small
Medium Large
Field Crops* 8852
67.17
6009
54.77
7156
62.89
11180
56.83
10699
64.49
12234
68.98
16557
56.30
14211
59.83
19435
68.31
14226
64.39
Animals 2415
18.32
3260
29.71
2614
22.97
4010
20.39
2772
16.71
2280
12.86
5190
17.65
3240
13.64
2653
9.32
3005
13.60
Homestead 1912
14.51
1703
15.52
1609
14.14
4481
22.78
3120
18.81
3222
18.17
7664
26.06
6301
26.53
6365
22.37
4863
22.01
System Total 13179
100.00
10972
100.00
11379
100.00
19671
100.00
16591
100.00
17736
100.00
29411
100.00
23752
100.00
28453
100.00
22095
100.00
Figure in italics indicates percentage of total
*Excluding summer and rabi vegetables and potato which are included under homestead
Table 4.6.2 Relative share of Various Components in Working Capital in the Major Farming System in North
Bank
Plain Zone of Assam
Net Return (Rs.)
Components Small
Medium Large
Field Crops* 2968
68.50
4134
60.02
3047
63.96
5412
68.14
4746
62.44
5596
71.71
9324
61.00
7135
60.63
9044
74.13
6784
62.36
Animals 867
20.01
1878
27.26
1263
26.51
1423
17.92
1615
21.25
1135
14.54
2800
18.32
1605
13.64
1115
9.14
1952
17.94
Homestead 498
11.49
876
12.72
454
9.53
1107
13.94
1240
16.31
1073
13.75
3160
20.68
3029
25.74
2041
16.73
2142
19.69
System Total 4333
100.00
6888
100.00
4764
100.00
7942
100.00
7601
100.00
7804
100.00
15284
100.00
11769
100.00
12200
100.00
10978
100.00
Table 4.6.3 Relative share of Various Components in Human Labour Employment in the Major Farming
System in
North Bank Plain Zone of Assam
Net Return (Rs.)
Components
Small
Medium Large
Field Crops* 187
77.59
167
62.31
167
74.22
280
71.25
270
73.57
287
77.36
454
74.67
462
75.37
452
78.20
413
73.62
Animals 36
14.94
68
25.37
42
18.67
59
15.01
62
16.89
41
11.05
78
12.83
71
11.58
56
9.69
81
14.44
Homestead 18
7.47
33
12.31
16
7.11
54
13.74
35
9.54
43
11.59
76
12.50
80
13.05
70
12.11
67
11.94
System Total 241
100.00
268
100.00
225
100.00
393
100.00
367
100.00
371
100.00
608
100.00
613
100.00
578
100.00
561
100.00
67.17
18.32
14.51
54.77
29.71
15.52
62.89
22.97
14.14
56.83
20.39
22.78
64.49
16.71
18.81
68.98
12.86
18.17
56.3
17.65
26.06
59.83
13.64
26.53
68.31
9.32
22.37
64.39
13.6
22.01
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Small Medium Large
68.5
20.01
11.49
60.02
27.26
12.72
63.96
26.51
9.53
68.14
17.92
13.94
62.44
21.25
16.31
71.71
14.54
13.75
61
18.32
20.68
60.63
13.64
25.74
74.13
9.14
16.73
62.36
17.94
19.69
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Small Medium Large
77.59
14.94
7.47
62.31
25.37
12.31
74.22
18.67
7.11
71.25
15.01
13.74
73.57
16.89
9.54
77.36
11.05
11.59
74.67
12.83
12.5
75.37
11.58
13.05
78.2
9.69
12.11
73.62
14.44
11.94
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Small Medium Large
SYSTEMS IN
NORTH BANK PLAIN ZONE OF ASSAM
Net
return
Working
capital
Human
labour
Table 4.7.1 Relative Share of Various Components in Net Return in the Major Farming Systems in Upper
Brahmaputra
Components
Net Return (Rs.)
Small Medium Large
FS24 FS32 FS24 FS32 FS32
Field Crops
1430
9.81
6180 49.45 9088 22.63 10476 52.81 15565
56.56
Animals
9524 65.34 1810 14.48 21605 53.80 2911 14.67 3060
11.12
Homestead
3621 24.84 4507 36.06 9467 23.57 6450 32.51 8894
32.32
System Total
14575
100.00
12497
100.00
40160
100.00
19837
100.00
27519
100.00
* Excludes summer and rabi vegetables, tomato and brinjal which are included in homestead
Upper
Components
Small Medium Large
Field Crops
9148
57.65
4089 74.66 18128 51.00 6771 74.08 8997
68.98
Animals
6411 40.40 562 10.26 15885 44.69 1073 11.74 2070
15.87
Homestead
310 1.95 826 15.08 1531 4.31 1296 14.18 1975
15.14
System Total
15869
100.00
5477
100.00
35544
100.00
9140
100.00
13043
100.00
Upper
Components
Human Labour (Rs.)
Small Medium Large
Field Crops
123 41.14 356 69.40 401 58.97 385 58.69 597
65.89
Animals
160
53.51
99
19.30
238
35.00
188
28.66
187
20.64
Homestead
16
5.35
58
11.31
41
6.03
83
12.65
122
13.47
System Total
299
100.00
513
100.00
680
100.00
656
100.00
906
100.00
9.81
65.34
24.84
49.45
14.48
36.06
22.63
53.8
23.57
52.81
14.67
32.51
56.56
11.12
32.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
Small Medium Large
57.65
40.4
1.95
74.66
10.26
15.08
51
44.69
4.31
74.08
11.74
14.18
68.98
15.87
15.14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Small Medium Large
41.14
53.51
5.35
69.4
19.3
11.31
58.97
35
6.03
58.69
28.66
12.65
65.89
20.64
13.47
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Small Medium Large
SYSTEMS IN
UPPER BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY ZONE OF ASSAM
Net
return
Working
capital
Human
labour
CHAPTER - V
CONCLUSION AND POLICY IMPLICATION
The prevailing farming system in different agro-climatic zones is by far a mixed type. It is
basically
a diversified system with dominance of crop activities. But in char areas especially in the LBVZ,
farming
system is either pure crop based or mixed (crops and animals). In all other situations usually
homestead
component bears immense importance because with a meagre working capital investment this
component
can not only contribute sizeable net returns but also generate employment to farm family labour.
But in
char areas the scope of expansion of homestead farming is rather limited because of very
smallness of
homestead area. At best farmers in the char areas can rear few livestock. Usually during Rabi
season the
farmers in char areas grow a good number of high valued crops.
The animal component in the farming system is undoubtedly important but the quality or breed
of
animals reared in the farms are mostly local as a result the productivity of these animals are
rather poor.
Nevertheless, there is scope to gradually replace the local breed of animals with the improved
one, which
will not only increase net returns but also generate additional employment opportunities in the
farm. Some
of the allied activities like sericulture and weaving, bee keeping, cane craft, bamboo craft etc.
have not
been considered in the present exercise. Inclusion of these activities under the homestead
component of the
prevailing farming system would have further increased the relative share of net returns and
employment.
Several constraints often hinder the adoption of ideal farming system in different agro-ecological
situations. Some of these constraints identified are low level of farm mechanisation and poor
draught
power, lack of assured irrigation and its utilisation, inadequate credit facilities in the farm sector,
poor
transport and communication, unremunerative prices and poor marketing infrastructure,
inadequate capital
investment in agriculture etc.
Fresh studies on farming system research should be taken up incorporating all such activities or
processes in larger scale in different agro-ecological situations. This will on one side help in
identifying
changes, which have taken place in the system and on the other side to know the system in
greater details
in totality.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.Bhowmick, B.C. et al, 1990. Economics of Different Farming System in Sonitpur District of
Assam,
Non-Project Faculty Research, Department of Agricultural Economics, Assam
Agricultural University, Jorhat-13
2. Barman, R.N, 1990. Effect of Subsidy on Farm Production: A Comparative Study of Tribal
and Non-
Tribal Farms in Nalbari District, Assam, M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis, Unpublished, Department
of Agricultural Economics, FA, AAU, Jorhat-13
3.Das, R, 1995. Farming System Approach in Developing Ideal Agricultural Production Plan
under
Different Agro-Ecological Situations in the North Bank Plain Zone of Assam, Ph.D.
thesis, Unpublished, Department of Agricultural Economics, FA, AAU, Jorhat-13
4.Das, J, 1996. Studies on Viability and Sustainability of Specific Enterprise Based Farming
System,
M.Sc.(Agri.) thesis, Unpublished, Department of Agricultural Economics,
FA,AAU,Jorhat-13
5.Expert Team, 1997. Studies on Land Utilisation for Cultivation in Assam,(Land Utilisation in
Assam
with Special Reference to Wasteland, its Extent and Utilisation ,Special Study
conducted in the Department of Agricultural Economics, FA, AAU, Jorhat and
Sponsored by SLUB, Guwahati, Assam
6.Gogoi, S, 1992. A Study of Resource Optimisation in Irrigated and Rained Situation in Rupahi
Block,
Nagaon, Assam, M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis, Unpublished, Department of Agricultural
Economics, FA, AAU, Jorhat -13
7.Hazarika, D, 1991. Farming System Analysis under Flood Prone Situations in Assam: A Study
in
Lakmimpur and Nagaon Districts, Ph.D. thesis, Unpublished, Department of
Agricultural Economics, FA, AAU, and Jorhat-13
8.Krantz, B.A, 1974. Cropping Pattern for increasing and Stabilising Agricultural Production in
the Semi-
Arid Tropics, International Workshop on Farming Systems, Organised by ICRISAT,
Hyderabad, Nov. 18-21
9.Maji, C.C, 1991. Farming System Approach to Research, Indian Journal of Agricultural
Economics,
Vol.XLVI No.3
10.Sarma, R. 1992. A Study of Production Pattern in the Char Area of Barpeta District, Assam,
M.Sc.(Agri.) thesis, Unpublished, Department of Agricultural Economics, FA, AAU,
Jorhat-13
11.Sarma, J. K, 1992. Potentiality of Increasing Farm Income and Labour Employment Through
Farm
Planning- A Study of Golaghat District, M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis, Unpublished, Department
of Agricultural Economics, FA, AAU, Jorhat-13
12.Tejwani, K.G, 1974. Case Studies in Farming Systems in the Semi-Arid Tropics of India,
International
Workshop on Farming Systems, Organised by ICRISAT, Hyderabad, Nov.18-21

Farming System in

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Farming System in

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Farming System in

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FARMING SYSTEM IN

ZONAL MAP OF ASSAM

You might also like