https://ieltsfreeway.

com/ielts-essays-crime/

Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In order to create a safe and sustainable environment, officials should reform the society. I do agree up to some extent that
those criminals who commit low level crime must be made to do unpaid work. While, severe criminals should be put behind
the bars.

There are number of ways available where certain prisoners / criminals can be assignedan unpaid work instead of putting
them behind the bars.For instance, cleaning streets, planting trees and working for charity are suitable tasks where these
offenders may be asked to do such works. This may help to reduce the environment problems and provide opportunity to
lawbreakers to keep themselves engaged in society beneficial activities. Although, this strategy may increase in number of
crimes because the offenders feel themselves free even after doing wrong things but in parallel this is quite an effective way
to make such criminals realize to tread on right path.

On the contrary, the brutal Offenders who are involved in serious Crime like Murder, Hijacking, Rape, Abduction and so
on / the like / so forth on, they must be punished and put behind bars in order to set an example in the society so that no one
can be ableto take such wrong steps to ruin anyone’s life. Besides this, nature of crime should be taken in to account. For
example, if a child steals food from a store as his mother is starving in completely a different scenario than someone robbing
an old lady. The former deserves a second chance while the second should be imprisoned.

To recapitulate, someone with no criminal record and if found in slight misconduct must be treated differently than serious
killers. The objective of the law is to maintain peace in the society, not to punish people. Thus unpaid community services is
a great chance for criminals to bring them back to their normal life.

It is thought that isolating criminals in the prisons is the most effective way to maintain the safety of the society, however,
some people believe that some prisoners, who are not dangerous to their society, should be punished by encouraging them to
do community work instead of isolating them. I strongly agree with this view for two main reasons.

The first reason is the fact that prisons create more dangerous criminals than the streets as it allows the gangsters to gather
and share their experiences which encourage them to do more and more immoral actions inside and outside the prisons. This
problem can simply convert a normal persons, who had to spend short time in the prison for a minor felony, to a dangerous
criminal who may be dangerous for people’s lives.

The second main reasons which makes me believe that not all the criminals should by punished by isolating them is that
prison ,in principal, is away to correct the behavior of the criminals, therefore any other punishment that can guarantee this
correction can be adopted. For example, criminals who are arrested for driving under the effect of alcohol should serve in
the hospitals where they can learn about the catastrophic consequences of their unwise behavior. In addition, community
work helps the criminal to build their confidence and make them feel that they are integrated into their societies.

In conclusion, sending criminals to prisons is still a very effective way to keep the order in the countries, however, prisons
can lead to negative results with people who are convicted with minor felonies and for those people, engaging them with
social activities is more effective and it ensures that they will not commit more crimes in the future.

Some people suggest that criminals should repay their community with volunteer work rather than to be imprisoned. While I
agree with this to certain extent, I believe that putting serious crimes in community result in many potential risks.

On the one hand, there are some benefits of prisoners doing social work for community. First of all, this will make offenders
useful in their local communities. For instance, they can clean streets, talk to school groups, and attend in producing
products. This may result in reduction in the number of social workers needed in communities, using taxes effectively, and
social reintegration of ex-prisoners later on. Furthermore, this is a good form of crime prevention because it creates a fear of
punishments among potential offenders. The evidence is that besides learning many valuable stories from that, children
could also stay from exposure to potential crimes, which prevent them to commit crimes in later life.

However, I think that law authorities should note other perspectives about imprisonment apart from serving for community.
Firstly, doing unpaid public work is not a sufficient punishment because it may not reform offenders. As a result, some
criminals might recommit crimes more seriously. For example, rape crime and theft are likely to continuously commit
further offences later on as they have a dysfunction in the decision-making process, according to psychologists. Secondly,
criminals should be locked up away from their victims. This is because they have to take the responsibility for the pain and
loss that victims and their loved ones experienced.

In conclusion, it is certainly true that unpaid community work could be considered in rehabilitating criminals, but it does not
mean that authorities should entirely rely on this method to reform offenders.

In order to create a safe and sustainable environment, officials should reform the society. I do agree up to some extent that
those criminals who commit low level crime must be made to do unpaid work. While, severe criminals should be put behind
the bars. There are number of ways available where certain prisoners / criminals can be assigned an unpaid work instead of
putting them behind the bars.For instance, cleaning streets, planting trees and working for charity are suitable tasks where
these offenders may be asked to do such works. This may help to reduce the environment problems and provide opportunity
to lawbreakers to keep themselves engaged in society beneficial activities. Although, this strategy may increase in number
of crimes because the offenders feel themselves free even after doing wrong things but in parallel this is quite an effective
way to make such criminals realize to tread on right path. On the contrary, the brutal Offenders who are involved in serious
Crime like Murder, Hijacking, Rape, Abduction and so on / the like / so forth on, they must be punished and put behind bars
in order to set an example in the society so that no one can be ableto take such wrong steps to ruin anyone’s life. Besides
this, nature of crime should be taken in to account. For example, if a child steals food from a store as his mother is starving
in completely a different scenario than someone robbing an old lady. The former deserves a second chance while the second
should be imprisoned. To recapitulate, someone with no criminal record and if found in slight misconduct must be treated
differently than serious killers. The objective of the law is to maintain peace in the society, not to punish people. Thus
unpaid community services is a great chance for criminals to bring them back to their normal life.

According to some people's opinion some people should be made to work in unpaid work for their community rather than
spending thei valuable time in prisons. This essay agrees with that suggestion totally because of the benefits it can bring
both to the society and themselves and then what criminals will obtain from their labor which is done in captivity.

From my point of view the money which is spent for their food will be paid or returned by their free work.I believe that this
idea will help the government not to damage its economy.for example, if they work in the streets, clean the roads and do any
kind of hard work in building ….

Besides hard work will make them appreciate the freedom and the work done by other people.And also doing such kind of
activity they will feel themselves mandatary person in society.For instance, one of my neighbours who was in prison for
robbery, while he was there he had been working for the building company. He learnt a lot about building and he could
continue his work after imprisment.

To sum up, I think doing unpaid job prisoners can also be useful for their network.It will also be benificial for their life
experience.

Crimes in many countries have gone beyond the alarming rate and it is a common practice to put convicted people behind
bars. A segment of society opines that not all crimes are equal and repercussion of harsh sentence for all offences is
uncivilised. They outline the need for unpaid community service as punishments for mild-offenders and youngsters. I
believe that certain offenders should be given non-custodial sentences.

The predominant reason for me to believe that unpaid community services like cleaning streets, planting trees, and working
for charity instead of prison is that many offenders are not born-criminals and the circumstance often incite them to commit
a felony. Besides, when such unpremeditated convicts are expelled from the society, they incline to re-offend in isolation as
there is none to accept them. Apart from this, juvenile delinquents should be rehabilitated by indulging them in community
services.

On the contrary, brutal offenders who commit heinous crimes like premeditated murder, vandalism, abduction, hijacking,
rapes and so on should be punished to set examples in the society. Thus, the background of a criminal and the motif of a
crime should be considered. For instance, if a teenager steals food from a store as his mother is starving is a completely
different scenario than someone robbing an old lady. The former deserves a second chance while the latter should be
imprisoned.

To recapitulate, someone with no previous record of crime and a sensible reason for a slight misconduct should be treated
differently than a serial killer. The objective of the law is to maintain peace in the society, not to punish people. Thus unpaid
community services is a great option to let some convicted lament for their crime.

• Prisoners sit idle all the time.

In the modern century, social order is firmly upheld under the unbiased judicial system and law. For this reason, the safety
and rights throughout the society are moderately protected. However, some insist that the prison sentence should be
replaced by unpaid community work for a number of criminals, while I strongly believe that the punishment should fit the
crime for the primary purpose of that deters people from committing crimes. Since both imprisonment and social work meet
those goals, one or another may be more suitable in some cases.

On one hand, community service order can be an alternative sentencing option for persons convicted of proportionately
light crimes such as loitering or other victimless crimes. It provides offenders with the opportunity to pay back the
community for their offending behaviour. Hence, it assists in their rehabilitation by developing and improving work-related
skills. However, good behavior in community service only can be an alternative mitigation of punishment for capital
criminals. For instance, drug tealer should be sent to jail due to the social security instead of being too lenient.

On the other hand, prison sentence is a reliable and moral system. Admittedly, it not only constructs a rigorous environment
to prevent the lawbreakers tackle crime another time, but also provides training and education opportunity to give them a
fresh start. Proportionately, heavy anti-social behaviour can be rectified under this strict penalties. More importantly, prison
functions as a deterrence to intimidate people never break the law because there is a grave price behind that is losing
freedom, relationship and given an ever-accusation.

Ultimately, community service can be an alternative option for some light offenders and one of the means in mitigation of
disciplining for capital criminals in order to resocialize the offenders and protect the society from crimes. Both of these two
penalties have a place for different circumstances.

The Crime Rate Nowadays Is Decreasing Compared To The Past Due To Advances In Technology
Owing to the technological innovations that aid in solving the crime quickly, in the recent days people are witnessing a
drastic reduction in the incidence of crime compared to the past .In my opinion I agree with this view as technology helps in
saving time by enabling the sharing of information about offenders and by helping to monitor crimes that are about to
happen.

There is no scepticism about the fact the recent advancements in the field of computer technology aids in the sharing of
information at a rapid pace. What I mean is that digitalisation of the criminal records and other important data about crimes
across the globe has enabled state authorities to track the offenders and maintain the law and order. To illustrate this,
Interpol is an international organisation that maintains digital data about international drug cartel and mafia leaders which
enables every state to trace such criminals without difficulty and thereby take action with sufficient evidence.
Furthermore, technology certainly helps to prevent crimes that are about to happen. To be more precise, if people are aware
of being monitored, not only will they obey the rules but also refuse to get involved in such crimes. A good example of this
is that the installation of speed cameras with continuous monitoring facilities has curtailed the traffic crimes dramatically
across major cities in India.

Lastly, technology helps to control crime by raising awareness among the public. In other words ,police personnel use mass
media and the internet not only as an effective medium to communicate but also to raise awareness about cybercriminals
and their style of doing fraudulent activities. A clear example of this is the effective awareness campaign about online
hackers which resulted in a drop in complaints related to stealing of personal banking information.
To sum up in my opinion I strongly contend that technical inventions definitely have a supplementary role in curbing crime
by raising awareness and monitoring.

Crime is actually considered as the modern day cancer, which affects almost all parts of the world inspite of country
barriers. Surprisingly it has shown some signs of decline as compared to the past, no one ear expected this would happen.
Many people believes that it is due the advanced technological developments. I completely agree with this option because of
the following reasons.

Currently we are living in technological era. Law enforcements and authorities are making use of this hi-tech improvements
as a tool for controlling the crime rate. For instance, the technology giant google developed a facial recognition software
which can able to detect a particular person even if he changes his identity or appearance. Cops are using this technology to
hunt criminal who are on the run and ensure the safety of the citizens. Moreover technologies like DNA recognition, is
helping the authorities to keep their city free of crimes by identifying the wanted criminal from the public and putting them
behind the bars even if they could be able o change their entire look.

Furthermore, criminal now a days think twice before committing a crime because they are always worried about being
caught by red handed with proper evidence because of the equipments like security cameras and heat sensors. In addition
these kind of technologies also helping the country's prison system to run effectively and reducing the jail breaks to a
minimum. Likewise general public is also integrating these kind security equipments at their homes and offices to prevent
the possible future crimes.

In conclusion, we can definitely say that technological advancements making a huge impact in all around the world to
control the crime rate and criminals.

There is no any doubt that in present scenario crime ratio has reduce as compare to early years. Because , government more
public tax fund to spend on security and use to technology for decline the criminals activity. I agree with this statement and
discuss both point of view.
On the one hand ,there are number of stunning benefits of decreasing crime rates. These include enchanced footprint
machine ,lie detective ,high tech cameras. Firstly , government and private firms installed the CCTV camera around the
society ,with the helpful for copes to catch the criminals easily and sometimes prevent the crime. Moreover ,law
enforcement and authority a makes the strictly rules and regulation for this reason people more scared to doing the violence
in public spot. For instance ,in the global more nations but ,the one of the country in Dubai inside 0 percent crime rates.
Thus ,where if individual try to steal the car then ,automatic sensor on car slow and lock the gate.
On the other hand ,there are couple of drawbacks of the technology. Secondly ,people more depends on technology for this
reason who culprit find out the new way to do the crime by through computer ,cellphone. Additionally ,they mind machine
through hack the websites ,with to steal the significant information and data which sell to others person. Furthermore ,
lawbreaker cell phone along with sit at home to do the ease fraud with hide to own original identity after that online
withdrawal the money from bank without any trouble.
In conclude ,it can be seen that whereas the technology has brought some disadvantages in terms of waste money
,hacking ,cyber crime ,it's advantage such as people feel more secure in moder era than formal.

https://ielts.completesuccess.in/index.php/2018/09/14/crime-rate-is-decreasing-compared-to-the-past-due-to-the-
advance-in-technology-as-it-can-prevent-and-solve-the-crime/

Many criminals commit further crime as soon as they are released from prison. What do you think are the causes of
this? What possible solutions can you suggest?

Crime rate has increased manifold these days. In spite of the punishment, many convicts tend to repeat crimes once they get
released from jail. I think there are several reasons for this behaviour. In my opinion, it is the responsibility of the
government and the society to solve this problem.

There are many reasons that encourage criminals to commit crimes again. The most important ones are social stigma, lack
of emotional support and poor job opportunities. Criminal background drastically decreases job opportunities as no
employer prefers to appoint an employee with criminal record. This leaves them with no career options and thus no financial
support. Many times, these criminals are not accepted by their own families and this makes them lonely and homeless. In
addition to this, people don’t want ex-convicts to reside in their communities and treat them with suspicion. All these factors
lead to hopelessness and directly or indirectly promote violence.

However, these problems can be avoided to a large extent by government’s intervention as well as changes in people’s
outlook towards these culprits. Jail inmates should be taught about the best possible ways to handle life in the most difficult
situations and this will prevent them from committing crimes again. The government should organise schemes that provide
financial assistance and train them in useful jobs. Constant psychological counselling is necessary for the criminals and their
families to rebuild personal relationships. The society should also change their mindset and attitude towards prisoners and
provide them with the necessary emotional support to become responsible individuals.

To conclude, though there are quite a number of factors which encourage criminals to commit crimes again, I am of the
opinion that the government and the society should take the responsibility to rehabilitate ex-criminals so as to prevent them
from committing further crimes.

Many criminals commit crimes again after serving time in prison and thus become a threat to the society. In my opinion,
lack of employment and rehabilitation opportunities is the main cause of this disturbing phenomenon. The only way to
prevent ex-prisoners from reoffending is to ensure that they are properly re-inducted into the society.

Most organisations are reluctant to provide employment to a person accused of a crime or an offence. Such an individual is
perceived as a threat to the organization and thus denied a job at the company. For example, the employer may fear that the
convicted person will continue the malpractices and eventually cause loss to the company. Unfortunately, an unemployed
ex-prisoner has a tough time making a living and in their desperation they get into crime again. The society’s apathetic
attitude to convicts is another reason that prevents their reformation. Someone who committed a crime is considered as a
criminal even after they complete the punishment. Consequently, many convicts tread the wrong path again.

In order to ensure that any lawbreaker walks the right path after the punishment, the government needs to provide an
opportunity to improve by the provision of at least a low paying job. Convicted criminals also need counseling so that they
understand the need to reform themselves. If an individual is offered a chance to live with dignity again as well as guided
for personality development, he or she is less likely to reoffend. For example if someone guilty under the law for monetary
theft has a chance to earn income through righteous ways, there is an assurance that the same offence will not be repeated
by the person. Thus, to prevent the criminals from repeating their crimes, it is necessary that they are introduced to possible
solutions to lead a good life again.

To recapitulate, many of the convicted criminals tend to continue their heinous practices even after serving time in the
prison. The essay discussed how the inability to earn a living and lack of personal awareness has led criminals to commit
more crimes after being released. This essay also suggested solutions to reduce re-offending by providing fair opportunity
for improvement along with proper counseling.

It is true that convicted criminals commit offences again upon their release. There are various reasons for this, but steps can
definitely be taken to tackle the problem. In my opinion, there are three main factors which encourage criminals to commit
crimes again.

Firstly, it is difficult for the ex-criminals to secure a job for living. Employers believe that criminals are not trust worthy to
be recruited and reject their applications. Secondly, criminals are stigmatised by the society. Usually, people do not like to
interact with criminals and not many landlords want to let their house to them. Finally, relatives and friends hurt and isolate
ex-criminals by blaming them for everything wrong with their family.

On the bright side, there are several ways to reform criminals. I believe that governments have an important role to play
here. They should introduce special workshops that teach various skills to prisoners / ex-offenders. Later these people
should also be provided with some funds with which they can establish their own businesses. If these people can find
employment, they are less likely to commit crimes again. Community leaders should also play an active role in breaking the
barriers between the criminals and the society. They should give criminals an opportunity to have meaningful interactions
with other members of the society. At the same time, loved ones should understand the mental turbulence of ex-prisoners
and give them the support and confidence.
In conclusion, criminals will continue to reoffend unless the government, the society and families trust and help them to
reclaim their lives.

There is a fact that more and more criminals become repeat offenders after they have released from prison, which is a
headache to police and law enforcement officers. The essay below is going to explain the causes of this problem as well as
suggest some possible solutions.

To begin with, prisons only removes criminals from society without any education or therapy for their mindset and
character. To put it simply, dangerous people are isolated or removed from the community to not commit crimes and
adversely influence other people. However, they are not re-educated to become a good citizen. Another factor is the
difficulty to reintegrate back into society. There is no denying that prisoners are not welcomed by society. That the way the
community treats them makes it is hard for them to return and live ordinarily, which may lead them to the old path.
Particularly, it is usually difficult for offenders to look for a job because of their criminal history.

Therefore, to deal with repeat offenders, some feasible solutions should be taken into consideration. On top of that,
education is probably the important one. In other words, criminals should be rehabilitated to become better citizens. For
example, during the time in prison, prisoners should be arranged to work and learn a job which will be useful for them after
prison. In addition, when a prisoner is officially released, the government should support them in reintegrating back into
society. For instance, they should be helped to get a job after prison. By doing that, they can make money and seek for a
stable life, which will help to prevent them from becoming repeat offenders.

By and large, the government and society should forgive and facilitate prisoners, who repent of their faults, to have a new
life after prison. That is probably the best way to reduce the rate of repeat offenders.

It is suggested from a research that the majority of criminals commit crimes when released from jails and this is a very
dangerous thing to the society nowadays. I think we should make some regulations and practices to avoid happening this.

The current situation is very worse due to this increasing number of crimes in the world everywhere. Most of the crimes are
being done by criminals who were sent to the prison earlier. And this thing gives a feeling to me that if criminals commit
crimes, again and again, there is a problem in our punishment system. Therefore government and people should take some
actions on this.

As I mentioned above, there might be many reasons for occurring crimes in the society. Firstly, criminals do not have a
feeling about the society, culture and religion. Moreover, there is no humanity that can be seen in these criminals. So the
Government can put some practices of brainwashing sessions to the prisoners on humanity, culture and other valuable
things. Furthermore, it is better if there are some kind of sessions about the art, nature etc. Simply, I would like to highlight
that criminals are also human beings and we have to make them think and feel properly before releasing them.

Secondly, there might be a big punishment level rather than current one, according to the crime levels. Then people will fear
to commit crimes continuously including prisoners who were set free.

Thirdly, I think it would be great if the jail authority introduces an evaluation process of criminals inside the prison to
identify who the better ones before releasing them are. So that we can have a mechanism to keep bad ones inside the prison
until they come to a good mindset.

To sum up, I think these crimes are happening due to the bad attitude of criminals. So when we are going to release a
criminal, we have to make sure that this person might not commit a crime again when he is set free. To do this, the
government has to take some actions inside the prison and then crime level might be controlled.

Nowadays in many countries, the crime rate is at a mammoth rate. Once the criminal is set free from prison, they will do the
crime again. There are a number of reasons for this. I will discuss this in the below paragraphs.

Firstly, when the criminals are sent to prison, if they become close to criminals who committed notorious crimes, they will
try to follow them. Also, in some jails, the criminals do some illegal activities by sitting in jail itself. Sometimes, they bring
drugs inside the jail premises itself. If the criminals who committed a crime for the first time comes in contact with these
criminals, they slowly become drug addicted. This not only disturbs their mind in a negative way as well, but they will not
correct themselves once they are released from jail.
Secondly, the society does not accept criminals once they are released. There are cases when even a family will get isolated
from criminals. Also, criminals find it very difficult to get jobs. This makes the criminal's mental upset and for the survival,
they repeat the crime again and again.

In order to solve this problem, the government should take some steps. Firstly, in jail, the system should be made in such a
way that, the criminals will not indulge themselves in illegal activities. They should be monitored continuously inside the
jail. Also, there should be cultural, spiritual programs organised in jail, so that the criminals mind gets prepared when they
are released. In addition, criminals who are well talented in some activities like sports, arts, studies etc, should be
encouraged. Convicts should be equipped with some useful skills during the detention period, as this will help them for
survival after they released. One of the examples would be giving training on technical courses like plumbing or mechanical
courses (Automobile repairs) or electronic repair courses etc. Thirdly, awareness should be created in the society so that the
criminals are treated as normal human being's once they rejoin the society. There should be job opportunities given to the
criminals depends on their talent and behaviour.

To sum up, in my opinion, prevention is always better than cure. Criminals are like us, they are human beings. Some of
them might commit crime due to the fact that situation makes them do. The government should create enough employment
opportunities so that no one is unemployed. Also, there should be strict rules made about drug mafia so that no one gets into
drug addiction. If the government takes these steps very effectively, we can expect crime free society in the near future.

In today’s modern world, the crime rate in everywhere around the globe is increasing at an alarming rate. A recent report
research has shown that the continual growth in crime rate is significantly due to a large proportion of criminals will re-
offend when they are released from prison. It is, therefore, important for us to establish the practical ways to tackle this
problem.

To some extent, I believe that if there is rehabilitation being done in jail, the criminals are unlikely to commit the crime
again after they are out of the prison. Rehabilitation is crucial and must be carried out in jail to educate them what are the
good values and what are the bad. This action will further encourage them to think about what they have done over the
years. Once they realise what they did in the past are wrong, they will regret and may not re-offend whatsoever.

Nevertheless, I have brainstormed and come out with the ideas that could be proved useful in kerbing this problem. To
begin, there should be a change in the crime-related legislation. Those who commit serious crimes should be given a lengthy
sentence to prison so that they have no opportunity to re-offend. Undoubtedly, it will indirectly become a deterrent to the
would-be offender and thus helps to reduce the possibility of commit crimes after they are released from jail. In addition, the
government should also arrange paid job to the criminals after they set free from prison, it is owing to the reason that they
will not be facing financial hardships. According to a recent study conducted in Malaysia, most of the criminals will re-
offend only when they have financial problems.

In conclusion, I believe there are tonnes of ways government can take to cope with this problem and most of the criminals
will not commit crimes again if they were given a chance to contribute to society like everyone else do and have a proper
job to earn a living.

It is true that many criminals engage them on more crime activities after discharging from the jail. There could be some
reasons for such a choice, and I believe that both government and individual should take steps to deter them from prior
lifestyle.

Unemployment is the main issue for prisoners after an imprisonment. Most employers would refuse them to recruit for past
criminal records, and they fail to earn money for living. However, it will easier for them to earn money if they reunite with
old criminal groups and involve in illegal work. Thus, they would proceed with more criminal activities for earning money.
A recent survey shows that in America, 30% of hijackings have done by criminals who were in police custody for different
period. Therefore, we could argue that lack of job opportunity encourage criminals to carry out more crimes after a period of
punishment.

Both government and individuals should tackle above mentioned issue with some steps in order to reduce their crime
tendency. The government can implement some rehabilitation program for prisoner in the jail which will offer them to self
correction by consulting with psychologist. For Example, In Norway women’s jails provide such a program that weekly
once or twice have to consult with psychologist and improving their disturbing thought. This helps criminals to find the way
of dispelling from the crime habit. In addition, as a member of society we should appreciate them if they want to work
rather than reject for criminal records. It will solve their unemployment issues as well as surviving cost.

In conclusion, both governments and people must play their part to divert the lawbreakers from additional crime activities
after releasing from prison.

As we all know that the world is facing with the crime problems and criminals are continuous commits crime after they had
been released from the jail. Commencing crime for the criminals is not that hard because they are used to it and in order to
reduce the crime rate the government of all the country should adopt strict rules and regulations which might help to
decrease the number of crime.People are involved in crime due to various reasons and some of them are due to influence of
criminal activities in their country, due to lack of education and due to weak legal actions.

Whenever a person is brought up in a country where the crime is very high then the person might be interested in getting
into crime. It tends to be normal for the people who are living in the country where every day they see the crime happening
in front of their eyes and they have already committed the crime so they tend to repeat it again because they do not have fear
as compared to other people.For example in the country like Afganistan the local people will be more inclined towards
committing crime rather than a person who is living in Australia.

Reducing the crime rate is not an easy job but country should always try to reduce the crime rate by applying legal
procedures.When there are strict rules, criminals might think twice before committing any crime.For instance, If the
criminal killed a person then the criminal should be given harsh punishment such as lifelong imprisonment or death penalty.

Lack of educational background will tend to force the people to commit the crime.Whenever a person is not educated and
might not get the desired employment
people might choose crime in order to earn a living.If a person cannot fill his/her desire then the person will be involved in
the crime such as stealing, murder and other criminal activities.

Education should be free from the government so that the people all over the world will be able to understand the
importance of life.Whenever a person is educated then they will easily find the desired job or will be involved in something
creative rather than being involved in something which will create bad impact in the country. A successful person is always
the one who have desired job or skilled person in their interested field.

To sum up, though there are various causes of crime happening everywhere and the governmental bodies play the top role to
reduce the rate of crime by adopting the necessary action which will definitely help to get over from crime.

It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media.
What do you think is the reason for the growth in the rate of juvenile crime?
What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation
It is considered that the rising of teenager crimes is related to the media. I like to mention that I completely argue that the
mass media focus on violent and sensational crimes. So we need to discuss the main reasons and the effect of media on
increasing the juvenile adequacies then the ways to prevent and solve this unpleasant situation.

It is obvious that media increased the crime because of two main reasons. Firstly, teenager tends to have role models. So if
their favorite role model involves in gangs or was criminal, they would have been negatively influenced by them and
consequently, might commit a crime. Secondly, media is one of the most important parts of our life which we spend most of
the time with. If the media's content was violence, it would affect our behavior and we would become depressed or
disappointed and as a result of that, we might encourage committing a crime to make our feeling better and reduce the
depression.

The solutions which resolve the massive increase of juvenile adequacies is to enforce observation of the children and pay
attention to age limitations. Children should use the media under their parent's observation and they have to be allowed to
watch some kind of films for instance. Furthermore, parents should pay attention to age limitation of some kind of movies at
first the children might break down but that is for their own benefits. Generally, I enjoy bringing children up with full of
attention and care.
In conclusion, most of the time people believe that violence in the media is an acceptable reason for rising of teenage
crimes. In fact, several reasons are known up to now, and media is one of the most discussable ones. We debate the effects
and the ways to avoid the rise of the crimes above.

It is considered by some that the high rate of juvenile delinquency is linked to the aggression displayed by the media. In my
opinion, violence portrayed by the media does play a key role in the escalating rate of crimes committed by youth; however,
I also believe that video game violence contributes to this issue. There are a number of solutions which should be
implemented to deal with juvenile crime.

Young adults are highly influenced by the media; since the media often shows that heroes are violent and are rewarded for
their behaviour, they become role models for youth. In other words, young adults try to imitate the behavior they see
believing it makes them "cool" to carry weapons and resolve their issues through aggression. Additionally, children who
watch television become desensitised to violence and they come to see it as a way of life. Hence, vulnerable youth who have
been victimized maybe tempted to commit crimes as means of resolving problems.

The impact of violent video games on adolescents is another important reason ascribing to the increase of juvenile
delinquency. The atrocities and brutalities exhibited by many video games have destructive influences on the behavior of
teenagers making them more hostile. To illustrate, studies have shown that some video games can alter the brain chemistry
and have an effect on the development of children causing them to become addicted to the game and developing aggressive
behavior. Thus, when these youth go out in the real-world, some attempt to re-enact those games without thinking of the
consequences.

There are a few effective solutions to the crimes committed by juveniles. Parents should supervise their children and
monitor their actions. Adolescents should not be excessively exposed to violence. Mentoring and educating young adults
about the consequences of their actions is also crucial. Another effective solution is to provide counselling and therapy for
troubled children and teenagers who have had problems in the past and have a hard time dealing with them. All of the above
points should be implemented to successfully decrease juvenile crime.

In conclusion, supervising, guiding and providing help for youth who are exposed to too much violence is vital to decrease
the crime rate and for their overall well-being.

Many people believe that the increasing number of youth crime is associated with the widely spread physical scenes in
media. In my opinion, this is one of the causes among in many reasons, and I believe that good parenting and a stronger
juvenile legal system can prevent minors from embarking on a life of crime.

In my view, there are two main reasons for the accelerating rate of youth violation. Firstly, parents are too busy with work,
which they are not being able to spend enough time with their children. Without the supervision and care, teenagers do not
feel the need to stay at home , as a result, they end up being on the streets and entertain themselves in a way that can excite
them , such as stealing. Secondly, the punitive measures for adolescence are not strong enough to stop them from
committing crimes. The penalties for young individuals are totally different from adults when it is dealing with the same
crime. In many countries, the sanctions for teenagers are considered to be warning rather than actual punishment.

I think that the incidence of youth crime can be reduced through good parenting and a strengthen juvenile legal system.
Parents play an important role in the growth of teenagers. If parents spend more time to connect with their children and get
to know their friends, teenagers are unlikely to feel bored and isolated from family. Meanwhile, strict penalties should be
introduced aimed at punishing young offenders, in particular, the repeat offenders, as I believe that this will be an effective
way to minimise and deter the crime intention of young people.

To conclude, the increasing number of youth offenders are driven by the lenient juvenile legal rules and distance
relationship between young individuals and parents, good parenting and deterrent penalty are the key solutions to solve this
problem.

Media is the most important factor that has caused a sharp increase in juvenile crime. There are numerous other factors, but
the main responsibility lies with the media.

In this age of digitization, information sharing has become extremely important. Media houses try their best to get to the
‘truth’ and in the process of doing that, they often print and broadcast content that is laced with violence and communal
hatred, poisoning the young minds of many youths. The newspaper on any given day contains news items related to these
categories.

On the individual front too, people are involved in sharing videos over social media. They often forget to consider the
content of what they are sharing and tend to promote violence indirectly. That is why the government often blocks internet
connectivity in troubled areas where there are chances of violence and clashes, to avoid further violence and fueling of ill
will towards others. Also, the internet is full of ‘hacks’ , even for committing crimes. Youths with too much time on their
hands, often end up surfing such sites.

Society needs to deal with the situation in its totality. The government should set strict guidelines for media houses to
follow, regarding the content they air or print. Violent content could be restricted to a few hours late at night. Similarly,
hacks that can be misused should be shared with caution. The publishers need to be accountable for the content they post.

Schools and parents need to play an active role in monitoring what the children are exposed to, both on TV and on personal
devices. They need to be keep an eye out for anything that is amiss and take steps to get suitable assistance for the child.
Sometimes all children need is someone to hear them out. It relieves frustration, helps them fight depression and keeps them
away from the criminal life.

Celebrities who are also role models, need to actively engage with children and motivate them the right way. Children are
easily swayed by what these people do on screen. It is important for them to hear the celebrities talk about the difference
between reel and real life.

The media which is blamed for instigating juvenile criminals is also the means through which the trend can be reversed. The
only difference is what role the media chooses to play and what we as responsible citizens allow the media to do.

It is true that the violence in the media could lead to an increase in the rate of youth crimes. There could be several reasons
why this is the case, and I believe that there are some solutions that the governments and individuals could take to resolve
the issue.
There are contributing factors why the rate of juvenile crime is increasing because of violence in the media. Firstly, people
could share provoking information or articles which stigmatize the others when they could not reach a compromise since
people could not take responsibility for what they are doing, they would commit crime in the society. For example, on social
network sites like Facebook or Zalo, members share information with each other, some people use it to study, while the
others would utilize these sites to encourage children commit crime or share provoking posts. Secondly, citizens have
freedom of speech, so they could post an article that attract viewers and readers, this article could lead to violence when
they have different standpoints.
In my view, there are some ways to prevent the problems described above. In terms of education, the police should be in
close contact with schools, so if there is violence in school, people can contact police for help and focus on young people
who have dropped out of schools. Another solution that could be taken by the governments is that fines are used as
punishment for minor crimes, but if the crime is more serious, prison is the most common punishment. Although being kept
in prison is an effective way to solve the problem, I believe teenagers who are prone o commit crime when they are released
from prison should be sent to educational schools.
In conclusion, there are various measures that people could take to overcome the difficulties and remedy the situation in
order to protect life of people, especially teenagers.

It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. What do you think is the
reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation?
It is believed that imprisonment of the youth is acribed to violent movies and other TV shows. There are several reasons
behind this trend, and a number of solutions should be proposed to handle it.
To begin with, there are two compelling rationales for the effection of violent media on young culprits. First of all, bullying
and stimulating scenes in the Fifth Estate, or even in the Forth Estate, form an ill-mannered character of hero in their mind.
To be specific, they suppose that a good man is conditioned to know how to fight and defeat the ones who do harm to them,
which can lead them to commit to infractions, not to mention the felonies like murdering. Secondly, such unhealthy shows
can be the causal agency of hyperactivity disorder on the youth, so that they are not able to control their actions. As a result,
after losing their mind, they just desperatedly keep hitting the defendants, and cause serious pain on them.
However, there are a myriad of methods should be taken to solve this problem. On the familial level, parental guidance can
contribute to mitigating it by commenting and criticizing those kinds of violent actions when they appear on TV. This can
help children form a right frame of mind and avoid insolent manners in the real life. On the national level, government
should organize more sport clubs and provide incentives to encourage children to join. For example, government can raise
tax credits for families having their children in those clubs in fiscal policy.
In conclusion, there are some certain reasons for the relationship between violent shows and juvenile crimes, and parents,
together with government should not take it lightly or overlook it.

In some societies, the number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing. Some people think that regardless of age,
teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishment. To what extent do you agree?

Adolescents are increasingly committing crimes in certain societies. Some people argue that adolescents should receive the
same punishment as adults for committing serious crimes. I agree with this statement because of the reasons which will be
discussed in this essay.

Adolescents are mature enough to understand what is right and wrong. This is because in the modern society, they are
exposed to various sources of information in the world through online and offline media. Unlike the teenagers of previous
generations, young adults in the current society know just about everything. They know how to differentiate moral activities
from immoral activities. Obviously, they are required to behave appropriately all the time.

When children between the age of 12 and 19 commit crimes, it is necessary that they should be punished appropriately in
order to control their immoral behaviours. They should be punished in the same way as adults and it will become a lesson to
all teenagers. If the judicial system is lenient towards young adults in terms of punishment, they will take it as an advantage
and repeat crimes in future. Recently, in India some people brutally raped an eight year old girl. A teenager is also involved
in this heinous crime. According to the police reports, the teenager who was involved in the crime inflicted more pain and
injury to the child than adults. If this boy is not given the same punishment as other adults, it is sure that he will repeat the
same offense in future. Lives of many young girls will be jeopardised if the legal system does not punish him adequately.

In conclusion, teenagers should also be given the same punishment as adults in order to control their criminal tendencies
because they are mature enough to differentiate legal activities from illegal activities.

Juvenile adequacies were increased in some societies, therefore some people believe that criminals who are a teenager and
committing a crime should get the adult penalty. I completely agree with the equal sentence for both teenager and adult
criminals. In this essay, I will discuss the reason for the agreement.

First of all, the punishment would help to prevent a teenager from committing the crime. Punishment would make a kind of
fear of the result of an action; as a matter of fact if teenager knew about the ultimate result of the crime they would forbid
themselves to act like a criminal. For example, In Iran, if people kill someone while driving without the driving license, the
highest penalty considered for them and as a result of that the young people under 18 which do not have driving license are
not allowed to drive and are strongly controlled by their parents because the fear of punishment exists in families.

Secondly, in my opinion, the age does not make sense in the embarrassing figure of the crime. It means crime is a crime and
when someone committed that, no regret would be acceptable especially about major crimes. For Instance, when a murder
takes place the victim would never have the chance of being alive anymore and in that case, law should not be soft on crime
despite how old the murderer was.

In conclusion, juvenile crime is unexpectedly rising and some citizens argue that teenager should be punished as the same as
adults. As I debate two reasons which are mentioned above I totally believe that, this opinion might positively work.

In the recent days, we can notice that the involvement of youngsters in crime has increased considerably. Due to this, a
section of our society conceives that those teenagers should be tried as adults. However, in my opinion the way we handle
juvenile and adults in crime should be different. This essay will discuss two paramount reasons supporting this view.

First and foremost, a crime is committed only when there a criminal act along with a criminal intent occurs. But, youngsters
neither have a vivid intent for their actions nor a clear understanding of the consequences of their doings. Furthermore,
many adolescents lack the cognitive ability to plan and execute a harmful activity. Consequently, most of the incidents are
due to peer pressure and impulsive reaction rather than a planned lawbreaking. Hence, it is inappropriate to try a teenager in
court as an adult.
In conjunction with the above justification, youth have more room for rehabilitation compared to grown-ups. Since it is
likely that they don’t comprehend the aftermath of their conduct, they stand a higher chance in realizing their wrongdoing
and mend their ways. Additionally, apprehending them along with adults, will not only turn them into hardened criminals,
but also does not achieve the goal of abating crime in the society. For these reasons, the trial and punishment for juvenile
and adult should be separate.

In a nutshell, since, the comprehension of a teenager is lower than an adult and, as they are more probable to rectify their
blunders; the sentence imposed on them should also vary accordingly.

In some societies, the number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing. Some people think that regardless of age,
teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishment.
As a matter of fact, there has been a threatening increase in the number of juvenile delinquencies in several countries. The
question that whether culprits should be severely punished no matter how old they are or not has been constantly heated. I
personally agree with this policy and believe that it will be considerably beneficial in a long-term view.
I concede that it is utterly reasonable to strictly sentence adolescence crimes because the main purpose of the law is to
protect citizens and prevent them from offending. To begin with, it would be unfair if government let offenders who are
pretty young with simple sentences. This is because at the age of teenage, people are likely to clearly perceive the serious
consequences of the crimes through not only the education they receive from schools and family but also certain real
situations happening in daily life. Therefore, they do not deserve the priority and there is no reason to decrease the level of
punishments for them.
Another reason why I regard harsh punishments as one of the most feasible solutions to efficiently address the sharp growth
of juvenile delinquencies is that those would be more dangerous if they did not have to pay the bill. It is undeniable that the
easy forgiveness can give teenagers committing major crimes the second chance to restart, nevertheless, it is considered as a
double-edged sword because it might not help those to completely get rid of criminal intent. As a result, they could
deliberately continue breaking the law and be extremely difficult to be reformed.
In conclusion, while acknowledging that adolescent culprits are too young, I state that govern bodies should give them
heavy sentences instead of easily forgiving them.

In many countries around the world, the rate of offences carried out by teenagers is growing. Some people believe that
punishment for serious crimes should be equal for both adult and teenagers. While others think that teenagers have
insufficient experience in their lives and are in the period of development, they will be under the control of adults, so that
does not warrant heavy punishment as adults get. In my opinion, courts should judge all people equally despite their age. As
well as they should consider the causes of crime itself.

However, youngsters have lesser experience in their lives, but the majority of them certainly know the difference between
right and wrong. Ultimately, it is parents' responsibility to educate their children to be aware of crimes and be careful of
approaching criminals. As they know their children's behavior very well, parents should take note of any abnormal behavior
of their children.

Some teenagers are believed to be violent and enjoy hurting or stealing from others, as some signs of psychopathy would
emerge in early age. These kinds of behaviors should not be neglected by their parents or school teachers; it is thought to
have a damaging impact that would lead to serious crimes in the future. Therefore, those are accountable for upbringing
youngsters that engaged in offences, should take responsibility for their negligence. As children are not completely
dependent, consistently need instructions and guidance from adults.

In addition, in most cases the adults exploit the teenagers; they get them involved in crimes. As they know children will get
lighter sentences, adults are responsible in all aspects.

In conclusion, in the period of development teenagers are getting experience in life and are not fully dependent.So adults
should take the blame for any crime that teenagers commit. The teenagers should receive light punishment because they are
not completely dependent.

In recent times, there are a burgeoning number of juvenile crimes are being reported in media and this have has made some
people to advocate that adolescent criminals should be (should be tried/ prosecuted as adults) judged for penalty same as
that of grown-ups. However, I disagree with this view since, unlike adults, being at the transformational age (this makes
little sense. Your sentence is complete without this clause. Moreover, character formation can’t be at a transformational
age.), character formation of minors is remarkably attributed to family environment and peer group pressure.
Undoubtedly, family has of a paramount importance in make making (in + verb + ing) or marring lives of young people. As
such, in some broken families, where parents are divorced or violent in nature, tender love and care are seldom being
provided to their offsprings. Those children’s psychology is too distorted to interpret the differentiate between virtue and
vice. Consequently, they are easily get (use only one verb) influenced by the criminal gangs for convicting conducting
crimes such as drug trafficking, theft, vandalisam and so on. For an instance, based on the recent article about juveline
deliquenecy in ‘The Hindu’, an Indian Newspaper, The Hindu, a famous Indian newspaper, reported recently that more than
50 percentage of the accused children who commit crimes were neglected by their parents. Thus, it is edvident that, taking
care of these childrens should be taken into consideration and trying to reform them should be the primary priority rather
than sentencing them into prisons.

Moreover, most of the adolescents are negatively tempted by their contempories peer group. Obviously, due to their
immaturity and illiteracy, when a would be delinquent maintains relationship with another unruly friend or a young
offender, they he (subject-pronoun disagreement) are more likely to commit crimes ranging from major crimes offences
such as manslaughter, smuggling and burglary to minor crimes ones such as like pickpocketing and drunk driving. For
example, according to the speech by a Juvenile court judge, circumstantial evidences against young defenedent always
prove that peer-group pressure acts as a threatening conduit of heinous actions. Therefore, according to him, providing
education to them will not only improve their behaviour but also enable them to understand how they are expected to
behave in society behave properly in society. (do not raise a question. Write a statement.)

By way of In conclusion, the threatening rise of crimes among youngsters has made (present perfect tense, not simple past
tense) many people to argue that penalty for the adults and youngsters should be carried out similarly ( ….. that adults and
youngsters should face similar punishment). Despite this argument, I believe that children below 16 years, who are more
susceptible to family violence and social pressure, should be educated or rehabilitated instead of punishing (this is covered
under despite this argument).

Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on
the streets is the only way to reduce crime. To what extent do you agree?

It is true that the crime rate is increasing day by day. There are various of situation can be done by both hands. Government
and people can make a huge role in decreasing the crime rate.

In my point of view, I agree that government can offer more forecasts to check on the minor area where criminals are living
and this way police can know their places and it won't be easy for them to go out one's police is surrounded. In addition, the
government should provide CC cameras, this way it will be tranquil for police to track where crime is taking place. For
instance, shopping malls, restaurants, in the street and in a hotel. The government should also consist of some strict
punishments, such as imprisonment, physical and financial punishment. These beneficial can marginally drop the crime rate
in most of the societies and communities.

On the other hand, individuals can also help and teach adolescents about crime negative impact on society and try to talk
and find out the piece of knowledge, why crimes are higher by most teenagers and young elders. Due to this reason, we can
stop them with criminals action. However, eye-witness can also make a change to stop crime by reporting quickly in the
nearest police station for the police to take strict action towards the crime.

To conclude, people and government can make a change to cut the crime rate, police enforcement is a great opinion but it
won't make a much significant change unless we also do our job to fix crime rate.

It is true that the criminal rate in many nations has been a significant issue. While I argue that increasing in the number of
police is a good idea, I also believe that there are various ways to deal with the situation.

At the outset, there is a common belief that if authorities allocate more police to areas where the rate of offenders is high,
the security status in those places will probably be keep stability. Firstly, a primary reason why criminals can fulfil illegal
activities is a lack of strict surveillance. By rising the quantity of police, more violent activities are likely to be prevented
from the beginning. Secondly, the increasing in the presence of police on the streets would enable residents to report when
they see the risk of crimes tend to occur in order to deter crimes. In case that security forces are far from residential areas,
citizens take a long time to report a crime. As a result, the timely intervention of police would be too late, which leads to
adverse consequences.

Despite of above arguments, I am of the opinion that there are many ways to decrease the level of crime. One of effective
methods is that governments can apply the technology. By installing CCTV systems, the streets will be put under control
twenty four hours per day. Thus, there is no need for the presence of security forces. What other solutions which authorities
could perform to tackle criminal issues is to keep the society out of disorder by developing the economy. When a huge
number of job are created, the unemployment rate, which is one of main reason leading to the growth of crimes, are more
likely to reduce. Therefore, people force on working to fulfil what they desire without committing crimes.

In conclusion, although extending more police on the roads is a good way to address crimes, it seems to me that alternative
methods would be possible solutions.

Many countries today are grappling with the best ways to curb rising crime rates and some have suggested that increased
police presence on the streets is the optimal solution. Although I think this would have a positive effect for obvious reasons,
the best solution is more nuanced and requires a deeper understanding of the sources underlying crime.

There is little doubt that employing greater numbers of police officers will have an adverse affect on criminality. One of the
best examples of this would be in New York City under Mayor Rudy Giuliani during the late 1980s and early 90s. At that
time, New York was a haven for criminals and many areas of the city were deemed too dangerous by residents to safely live
in or walk through at night. One of the many measures that Giuliani used to reduce crime was significantly increasing the
number of police officers during his time in office. This led to a reciprocal decline in crime and made the tourist-heavy
neighbourhoods almost entirely safe and the rougher districts at least passably crime-free.

The above-mentioned measures were only effective because administrators also tackled the root causes of crime. It is
generally agreed upon that the principle causes of crime are related to education indirectly and poverty more directly. If you
look at countries with extremely low poverty and unemployment rates, such as Japan, you will see correspondingly low
rates of crime. In Japan, this begins with one of the world’s most renowned educational systems. Students graduate from
high school and university with immediately employable skills and most are employed throughout their lifetimes. Since they
have money to afford a good standard of living there is little incentive for criminal behaviour and the crime rate is among
the lowest in the world.

In conclusion, the best way to reduce crime in the long-term is to invest more in education and the economy to stimulate job
growth and address the catalysts spurring on crime. Any government that is serious about making their country a safer place
must first take steps to improve their educational system as that will have the largest impact on creating the stable jobs that
discourage criminality in all its forms.
In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime?
How can we deal with those causes? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.

In many Countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of Crime? How can we deal
with those causes?

Criminal activities have shown growth in most parts of the world. There are several reasons but in my opinion two major
reasons are lack of formal education and unemployment and they are related to each other.

A recent study shows that crime rate has declined by approximately 30% in those countries where better employment
opportunities are available like South Korea, UAE and Qatar. To succeed in creating better job opportunities the government
should introduce right policies and implement them without any discrimination. For instance, the UAE has introduced a new
system that makes it easy to start your own business and have strict labor law to protect employee rights which ultimately
helps to divert young people from any kind of criminal activities.

Another solution which can play an important role in preventing people especially youngsters from indulging in any kind of
illegal activities is formal education. China is the right example for that. Recently Tim Cook CEO of Apple Corporation said
in his interview that China holds the biggest pool of skilled labor than any other country. This was only possible through
introducing free formal technical education policy to their young people and providing onsite experience at the same time.
People can also play an important role in reduction of crime rate by being more vigilant and responsible in their
neighborhood.

To conclude, lack of education and employment opportunities are the main reasons for the increase in the crime rate. By
providing vocational education for free or at affordable rates and by creating more employment opportunities the
government can address this problem to a great extent.

In recent times, crime has become the global issue and is increasing at an alarming rate. In this essay, I will examine some
factors contributing to this problem and will also suggest some solutions for the same.

There are several reasons for the increase in crime level. One of the reasons that is often given is the increasing gap
between the rich and the poor. One good illustration of this is that the people who are in dire need are bound to steal for
their livelihood. Furthermore, illegal activities such as consumption of drugs have also contributed a lot in enhancing the
crime level around the globe. For instance, According to recent news reports, in many countries like Mexico and, Iran, drug
addiction has contributed significantly in enhancing violence levels. Finally, although not a major cause but violence in
television and game is also a contributing factor to violence.

However, solutions are available to tackle this problem. Firstly, more satisfactory jobs need to be created for poor. In
fact, a recent study has concluded that majority of crimes can be curbed if basic necessities of people are met.
Furthermore, there has been little success in the war against drugs, so taking stringent actions against drug traffickers
can be another solution. To exemplify, the rising crime rate in Punjab can be halted easily by checking the cross border
drug supply from Pakistan.

After having discussed the most pertinent points of this issue, I feel that even though crime is a growing global problem,
mainly caused by the lack of basic necessities and unlawful activities, various methods such as creating new jobs and taking
severe actions are available which can prevent this from worsening.

Increasing tendency in crime rates has become a major problem in almost every country. Many sociologists believe that
criminals are not born to commit crimes there are few circumstances which influence them to do it.

There are few main causes which are widely assuming to for committing any crime. For example, underdeveloped countries
like Pakistan, India, Bangladesh are suffering from poverty and misery. This agony of starvation or unable to pay the
education fee for their children or lack of affording medical fee have become the main reasons to commit the crimes. Other
causes of crime varies according to situation. People are tend towards the luxury lives and to make it possible they find
various unethical ways to commit crimes. For example, in a tax department, a tax officer detect a tax evasion, however, the
tax officer has had a negotiation with that person and compromise his ethical duties over his luxuries. This behavior has
ultimately converted into a crime.

Citizens of any country may get equal opportunities to work in their country and must get equal rights for wages and other
facilities. Unethical behavior of any citizen should not be tolerated. Bribe, dowry and other ridiculous system should
completely be eliminated from the society. Education, medical facilities must be provided free or for very minimal amount
to those who do not afford to pay for it.

Generally, it is widely believe that any country who promotes education system eventually demoting the crime rates. Also,
developing equal opportunities for every citizen who wants his family to live a standard life, would not break the shackle of
ethical values and eventually refrain from committing the crime.

Recently, some research in TV or on newspaper appear that there are more and more crime happened in society. The reasons
lead to crimes could vary in different countries. I would like to discuss them In this essay.

First of all, I think that the main cause of crime is economical unrest and instability in my country. When a country's
economic is declining, it usually brings loads of society problems. For instance, the owner of factory or shop will reduce
employee's number or simply close those facilities in order to keep their wealth and avoid losing money during the period of
economic downturn. Therefore, many of people will lose their jobs, and it brings the potential risk to our society. If those
people still cannot find a proper job in the market because the job opportunity will become less than before when economic
is strong and companies, organizations are willing to hire more and more people, then they will face big pressure on feeding
themselves or their family. Eventually, some of them would select to do the illegal things like robbery, theft, etc, which will
cause huge damage as well as negative effect to our country and society.

There are a lot of possible solutions to resolve this situation and avoid possible consequences. Firstly, government ought to
develop economic progress and work our solutions to help those unemployed people to find jobs. Secondly, increasing our
punishment level is necessary, for example, Laws in Singapore is very strict, as a result, it has one of the lowest crime rates
in the world.

In conclusion, while crime is overly expanding in every country with different factors we can overcome these sources by
making solutions and policies to get an environment which is free from crime.

Many nations are witnessing a drastic rise in crime rates. I think this is attributable to multiple reasons such as lack of
education, unemployment, an inefficient judicial system, to name a few.

Firstly, education plays a crucial role in shaping an individual’s character. It is education that makes us capable of
differentiating right and wrong early in our childhood. Lack of basic education is one amongst the primary causes for
increasing crimes. For example, in my country India, a vast majority of population is illiterate. This has a deleterious impact
on the society as a whole because people turn to crime without any thought, they cannot comprehend what’s right and
wrong. To deal with this issue, primary education should be made available to everyone without any fees and government
should take serious measures to make this mandatory for everybody.

Furthermore, the other main cause of the spike in crime rates is unemployment. As it is rightly said ” An empty mind is a
devil’s workshop.” When people cannot find work, they have all the free time in the world. They think of crime as a
shortcut to obtaining and possessing the riches of life, without any hard work. To tackle this problem, authorities should
focus on increasing jobs and also introducing some compensation for unemployed people. In lieu of such compensation,
they should be made to do social and community work.

In addition, an inefficient judicial system is equally to be blamed. Failing to punish the criminals in time is yet another
reason why people are not afraid of committing crime. To exemplify, India reported the most cruel and inhuman gang rape
case a few years ago. It got global attention, there was mass protest, people demanded immediate justice. In spite of such a
movement, it took over three years to come out with a judgement and yet the criminals have still not been executed. In such
cases, it is the slow and laid-back judicial system which is responsible for many rape cases being reported every single day.
I think, if the government imposes severe implications on violating laws, crime rates will definitely see a rapid fall.

To conclude, there is a urgent need for the governments to focus on addressing illiteracy and unemployment problems,
which attribute to the rise of crime rates. At the same time it demands for strengthening the judicial system so people fear
the repercussions of committing a crime.

Some people think women should be allowed to join the army, the navy and the air force just like men.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.

Armed forces are made by government for defence their country from terrorism. Although, in many regions, women are
able to join the defence forces as men but some people believe that women should not join the army. However, only men
should join the army. So, i strongly disagree with this notion.

To begin with, sometimes female could do hardest work rather than male. So, government should give similar opportunity
to female for join armed force and save their country as well as their family. Hence, they earn some money for their family
and they teach some defence trick to their children for protect themselves. Therefore, remove inequality from the society
and an the human power.

Furthermore, there are many ladies who doing crime in the country.Thus, government should recruit ladies arm force for
catch the. Therefore, it would decreased rate of crime in across country and make terrorist free country. Moreover women
have good communication skill. So, they could work as a privet agent for their country but ladies need some powerful
training as well as opportunity. For instance, many women win medals and award in the india. India give some opportunity
to female for joining military. So, that is whay women do work as men in armed forces.
On the other hand, every girl is not brave and they have not ability to join military for defence purpose because they have
not knowledge about defence force and no strength for do work as a soldier. Thus, people think that only men are able to
join army, navy or air force.

To recapitulate, government should give opportunity to women for show their talent and creativity as well as give chance
for defence their country.

Whether women should be permitted to be the part of defense forces is unquestionably hot debatable topic.

Firstly, people who refute the idea of inducting women in army, the navy and the air force, argue about the might in
comparison to men. They find, this job for the women, not only difficult but also physically challenging. Secondly, in
various cultures women have been symbolized as entrusted caretakers of children because of their soft heart personality.
People from these societies will restrict them from such a tedious and harsh life experience required for the job.

However, one might easily find several women fighter in history like Laxmi Bai in India, who were famous for their
professional skills rather than simple life living. Also, in modern world, wars are fought either with automated weapons or
with proper strategy. Less strength required for this job can counter to those who disagree to see women soldiers. In addition
to this, women are also equally responsible to protect their country during war-time. They also have same feeling of
patriotism as men. It will be extremely unjustified to put these women away from battle field in some urgent and
unavoidable break through.

As, it can be easily seen that brining women to national forces not only give them a feeling of equality, but also make them
a responsible citizen. In my mind, I tend to believe that women should always be treated equally and hence, make them
responsible soldiers of the army, the navy, and the air force just like men.

There is no doubt that in past, women were living in four walls of the house while nowadays they enter into every field.
Some people agree that women should allowed to to take part in all type of jobs such as the army, the navy and the air
force. I partially agree with this statement and numerous reasons behind it.

First and foremost reason is that these types of jobs do not only require physical strength. Intellectual spill and academic
knowledge are most important for every job.because there are so many posts in army, navy and air force in which
intelligence power consider than strong physique.Moreover women are emotionally strong as compare to males. Sometimes
in tough situations these emotions help to solve the problems easily.

Furthermore, women are quite good management as well as leadership. As a result of it, when they get a chance to lead the
team in battle field then they easily manage it quickly. For instance, women in house always manage their time in household
core and they also know how to handle difficult situations.

However, some persons agree that they are not fit in such kinds of jobs . they think that women are not physically strong as
compare to men. Apart from that they are not mentally prepared for difficult situation such as in field of battle, accidental
situations and to face the terrorist.

To conclude, women should allowed to join army, navy and air force so that they can get a chance to show their spirit and
nowadays it is seen that women are rubbing shoulder with men in every field. So at least give them one chance to take part
in such jobs.

Since the dawn of the time, women have been playing a crucial role in the civilisation and development of mankind. It is
clear that women can play a vital role in various defence forces so the writer of this statement thinks that they are a blessing
for their country.

To commence with, women will be a boon to the force. To be clear, the world has realised that women are equally capable
as men in both mentally and physically abilities. As women are blessed with intellectual and cognitive skills, they can use
these invaluable skills in the force. In addition to this, as we know, women are already serving in the various other
physically demanding job sectors such as white collar and blue collar worker. It is unwise to select them in this job sector.
More importantly, women are naturally less aggressive and peace makers and these qualities are blessing for the force and
once they come to leadership these helps to reduce conflict among the nations. Further, women are already part of the police
department and they have proved that they are capable of doing adventures and riskier jobs. To cite an example, women
leaders such as Queen Isabella, Victoria and the like ruled vast spectrum of power.

On the other hand, women have some physiological barriers in joining the defence force. To make it clear, since women
have to give birth to the child and nurture them, they need maternity leave for that. If women are in the force, it would be
impossible for them to get leave at the time of war. Apart from that, many retrogressive people argue that women's primary
function is to prepare food and look after children and husband so they should not opt to go for a job.

To conclude, in this advanced era, women have been working in every realm and they have proved that they can contribute
a lot to the society so they should take in defence force.

The whole world is turning to egalitarian society in this modern context. Therefore, some people advocate that women
deserve equal rights to men in terms of working in the defence system of a nation. By contrast, others claim that females are
not the right choice for the jobs in army and police. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my perception.

There are many points to shore up the former view. First and foremost,
modern women have ability to rub shoulder with men in every field. Gone are the days when women were supposed to be
the weaker members of society. But at present, modern women are well educated, advance and active in every field. To
demonstrate, females such as Kalpna Chawla, Sania Mirza and Kiran Bedi have already shown their great achievements in
aviation, sports and police department. Hence, allowing females to work in the defence sector can promote the sense of
equality and unity among both genders and they should be permitted to work in army and police. In addition, giving females
opportunity to work in defence will uplift their self-esteem, dignity and respect in the modern societies. On the contrary,
others have conflicting views.

Numerous points can be mentioned to endorse the latter view. Initially, women are generally, considered physically less
strong and more sensitive as compared to men. Therefore, doing jobs in defence management is not a piece of cake for
women. What is more, jobs in army and police require strong temperament and ability to take brave decisions without
becoming emotional. But, females are neither mentally strong as men nor brave enough to deal with situations like war. This
is the reason why they do not suit to such professions.

In my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, both genders have their own set of individuality and
their abilities vary in distinct sectors. However, freedom given to women for joining army or police will enhance value of
females and disappear the differences on behalf of gender. Therefore, they should be given chance to step forward for
defence jobs.

To recapitulate, nature has blessed equal empowerment to both men and women. It is unjustifiable to underestimate the
capabilities of female without offering them a chance to prove themselves.

Many crimes are often related to the consumption of alcohol some people think that the best way to reduce the crime
rate is to ban alcohol. Do you think this is an effective measure against crime?
What other solution can you suggest?

Most of the time the criminals are drunk while committing the crime and some people believe that the main solution for
preventing the crime commitment is alcohol prohibition. I completely disagree with this view, because of a major reason
which I will discuss in the following paragraph, and then debate what the effective solutions are.

However alcohol consuming would affect on committing the crime, forbidden the alcohol is not the best solution for
decrease the rate of the crime. Because in that case people drunk in their privacy and as the result of that disobedience take
place. Moreover, alcohol is imported by trafficker; so, another crime happened. For instance, In Iran, the rule of alcohol
prohibition exists, but the hidden bar made up and the covert drunk people spread out in the whole country, but, still the
crime committed by drunken criminals and the increasing rate of alcohol trafficker become another problem which police
and governments are struggling with. So ban the alcohol might not solve the increasing rate of the crime problem.

The solution of reduction of alcohol consumption in order to reduce the crime commitment needs parents and governments
attention. First of all, parents should control their children to not drink alcohol before 18; besides, they should not consume
alcohol obviously and openly in front of their children's eyes. The Government should improve the educational goals and
teach the younger generation how alcohol would be harmful especially for their health and the safety of the society.

In conclusion, some people consider that, ban the alcohol absolutely reduce the crime commitment because most of the
crimes committed by drunken criminals. We debate the views and solution above.

It is indisputable that alcohol plays a key role as a major contributor to the rising crime rate. In my opinion, official
forbiddance of alcohol will definitely have a significant outcome in curbing felony. This essay will discuss an argument
supporting this view and the other probable actions to subside crimes induced by alcohol.

First and foremost, alcohol prohibition has already been experimented in certain states of India and has been found to be
effective. For instance, in the Indian state, Bihar, the crime rate has reduced by 27% after the ban of alcohol. This is
because, countless crimes happen owing to the aggravation and irrational behavior induced by alcohol. When the
availability of liquor is curtailed, people will be sober and hence will make levelheaded decisions and will not pursue illegal
activities impulsively. Therefore, liquor restriction is an efficient proposal to control violation of law.

Over and above, rehabilitation centers for addicts can be established in different regions, to ensure that the delinquents do
not become repeat offenders. Moreover, the social norm about drinking has to be changed through awareness programs.
This is because, a considerable number of people, start as social drinkers; deteriorate and give in to alcoholism. Hence, the
peer pressure should be nipped in the bud. This will further serve as a step in solving alcohol abuse and in turn as a
precaution to prevent crime.

In a nutshell, reformation centers and awareness programs will be instrumental in bringing a change in the social outlook
about alcohol and in turn in undermining the crime rate. Meanwhile, alcohol prohibition will aid in reducing the occurrence
of crime instantaneously.

https://www.rupielts.com/103-2/

Many people think that having one single fixed punishment for all crimes would be more effective. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of having a fixed punishment?

It is true that implementing common punishment for all crimes can be an effective way to protect the society. While this
regulation has many benefits, there are also drawbacks which are worth considering.

Having a fixed punishment will reduce the criminal’s intention to create crimes. It could aware the offenders that any kind
of offense will be punished with a strong law, and deter them from criminal activities. For example, in Saudia Arabia, there
have a law for burglar, is cut a hand of lawbreaker irrespective of items were stolen. In addition, this punishment system is
easy to implementation and less time consuming for verdict. Hence, victims would not suffer for long judgment process. In
this way, having a fixed punishment can divert the criminal from anti-social work and people enjoy a safe society.

However, despite the above mentioned advantages for having a fixed retribution, it has a negative effect in a society. This
situation is against the fair and egalitarian society. People will receive same punishment whether their crimes are major and
minor, and they would lose the respect for laws. As a result, criminals could be encouraged to involve multitude crimes. A
recent survey shows that in Bangladesh, 30% younger burglar become Hijacker in their adult age because they aware the
punishment will be the same imprisonment for that crimes. Another down side is that teenage offenders will deprive from
rehabilitation. They have to stay with same prison with other criminals and motivate to involve illegal activities. Thus, this
could increase the social crime rates which are not desirable outcome for a country.

In conclusion, it seems that the potential dangers of providing a similar punishment for all crimes in a society are more
significant than the possible merits.

Most of the individuals think that it is better to punish the criminal with an equal value in sentences. I totally and strongly
disagree with this view because justice is not to mean equality, but, in this essay we just discuss the benefits and drawbacks
of this opinion.

As one of the cons of fix punishment, People are different and have several behavior and beliefs. So consider about the
difference between people and their situation lead to having several flexible punishments. For instance, a woman who robs
some stuff in a supermarket for her children because of starvation should be considered as a criminal who committed crime
intentionally or committed the minor offence as the comparison with a murderer who kills someone because of earning
money. One of the pros of flexible punishment is that the influences of the crime have been emphasized. Each crime has its
own reflection and affects victim differently, therefore, it is essential to have different punishment for different crimes. For
example, the murderer punishment undoubtedly should be higher than shop robbery; hence, the effect of killing someone is
irrecoverable and it is not fair to punish the murderer as the same as other criminal such as a robber.

The benefit of the fix sentences is to make the judge much easier. It just needs to write down a law about crimes punishment
and the court just run out the sentence. Judge need to focus on finding the guilty persons and after that, it is the time to
punish them surely and independently. As an illustration, when a person kills someone no matter the murderer was mentally
ill or not, he/she should have maximum punishment and discrimination is not allowed.

In conclusion, most of the people considered that it would be fair if the entire criminal has an equal punishment without
thinking about what was the crime exactly. We debate pros and cons above and give some examples.

Every country has different methods of crime dealings. It is believed by a majority of citizens that fixed punishment is a
determined way for all types of violations. Nevertheless, this treatment possesses benefits as well as downsides.

A fixed sentence or punishing criminals with no considerations offers positive points for a country's jurisdiction. The first is
that it is easier and not time-consuming in giving a sentence judgment. For instance, a court just quickly refers to the law to
decide a penalty. Then, the law of fixed punishment prevents public revenge so that they cannot offend criminal as they will.
Another benefit is that this principle of detention could deter criminals. Therefore, people will think twice to commit crimes
because they know the consequences from the written law. Thus, fixed punishment as legal system delivers merits in ruling
criminals.

On the other hand, there are also some drawbacks of this commandment. It will be unfair for people who commit a crime
with different motives and scales. A case of a grandmother stealing three cocoa in Indonesia, for example, was a small
violence with forgivable motive. She stole those cocoa in order to buy food for her starvation. It was injustice to punish her
as severe as corruptors' punishment. In addition, it is likely possible to cause false judgment because of quick verdict that
provided by fixed punishment. The case of U.S federal court issuing false victim Aarthi S. Rao in 2010 embodies this idea
perfectly. Because of false judgment the victim nearly lost a half million dollar in that year. As a result of this, although
unfortunate, the negative impacts of fixed punishment can be seen.

To conclude, it is clear that even though fixed sentence has positive ramifications, its applications in courtroom may draws
unfairness. A serious awareness should be taken by both law makers and society to deal with the negative impacts that may
be drawn from this authority.

Some people think a crime should always have a fixed punishment, like life imprisonment for murder, whereas
others think you should take circumstances into account. What is your viewpoint?
Write at least 250 words.
Humans have created human like robots, but yet humans remain humans. Unlike the digital robots, who have a fixed yes or
a no; a high bit or a low bit; human behavior is quite complicated. More importantly, the situations humans put themselves
into are usually multi-faced. With apropos of this fact, I believe having a fixed punishment for a particular crime, could be
unjustified in most of the cases.

Most of the people argue that a crime is a crime and must be punished with full severity, there are always multiple cases to
it. For example-: a murder done in self defense cannot be regarded similar to the one done with cruel intentions. Therefore,
giving a life imprisonment in both the cases could be unfair to the former. The next important thing to be taken into
consideration is the mental condition of an individual committing a crime. For example-: consider a person who gets violent
on seeing fire, sees someone lighting the gas and hits him/her. On the other hand, consider someone who out of ulterior
motives hits someone. Rather than giving treatment to the former, if a fixed punishment is given, it will only worsen the
situation.

On the other hand, it cannot be denied that we live in a corrupt society and the criminals have become more intelligent.
Keeping loop holes in punishments help criminals to mold the law in their favor. For example-: a person can claim to be
mentally unfit in front of law to get away with the punishment. Even more, often the lawyers and the individuals, for money,
change the circumstances in which the crime took place.

Overall, it can be said that fixing a punishment for a crime could be disadvantageous for people who deserve a second call.
To overcome the side effects of providing the loop holes, the law must be strengthened and provisions must be made to
ensure people are not misusing the law for their own benefits.

Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the
circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account
when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both of these two views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant
examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Some people argue whether criminals must always subject to fixed punishment for certain crimes, or whether situations for
committing the crime should be taken into account before inflicting punishment. This essay will examine both sides of the
argument and outline my opinion.

On the one hand, criminal activities have reduced significantly over the centuries in the history of humankind. Fixed
punishments like the death penalty, life imprisonment for drug trafficking deter an offender from such heinous crimes. The
ruthlessness of such harsh punishments ensured safety and security in the society. For instance, according to a publication
on criminal justice from the C.I.A, Saudi Arabia has been consistently ranked top regarding achieving a low-crime index
due to its aggressive law for enforcing fixed punishments for designated crimes. Nevertheless, the main objective of the law
and order is to protect the innocents and punish the wrong doers. The fixed punishment often contradicts with the
fundamental objective of the civil society.

On the other hand, persecuting a convict violate human rights; often without considering the aspects leading to such crime.
Consider Saudi Arabia, ranked as the country with the lowest crime index in the world. The state’s implementation of a
strict fundamentalist approach to persecute criminals regardless the circumstances of the crime has drawn flak from many
human rights organisations. Amnesty International reported that fair trials are prohibited to criminals even if they are
wrongly convicted.

Finally, in my opinion, a convicted person should be given punishment only based on the circumstances and severity of the
crime. For example, if someone murders in the act of self-defense, the verdict given should not amount to life-sentence.

To conclude, inflicting fixed punishments may increase the safety and security of the society; however, it also violates the
human rights a suspect is legally entitled to.

Have you ever thought about being a judge? There may be various situations in our daily lives in which our judgments are
needed to be expressed. But is it really as simple as the situations we encounter every day when it comes to judging serious
crimes? For a long time, it has been a controversial issue whether there must be fixed punishments for any kind of crime or
the incentive is an influential factor that is crucial to be considered. I personally approve of the latter belief since there are a
lot of crimes in which the criminal is not really guilty.

On the one hand, a group of people dogmatically believe the punishment for any crime ought to be fixed regardless of the
crime’s motive. They state that if felons know there is severe punishment even for small crimes, they are hindered and will
never attempt to commit a crime. Therefore, the violence and crime rates decline considerably and thus a better society we
will have. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, the punishment for robbery is of one the robber’s hands being cut irrespective of
what he has stolen, an apple or a car.

On the other hand, the other group of society argues that where the felony stems from must be investigated and the
motivation should be taken into consideration when sentencing a criminal. As a justification, they cite that there are
situations in which the crime has not been done deliberately or the culprit is not the real wrongdoer. In particular, in an
involuntary homicide, the killer might be the victim since it might have a self-defense or a robbery for feeding a family
differs from robbing for profit. In this case, the judge is who can decide the best penalty considering every aspect and
condition of crime perpetration.

On the whole, even though fixed punishments can be extremely beneficial in the decrease of crime rate and may culminate
in a safer society, the justice system should be flexible enough towards certain felonies and consider the crime’s rationale
and conditions for giving the most appropriate verdict.

In recent years, there has been a rise in the number of crimes being committed. Many people are of the opinion that these
wrong-doings should be classified categorically. However, I believe that each offence should be looked upon in a subjective
manner, taking into account the nature and severity of these unlawful activities.

Giving a fixed punishment would definitely make court proceedings a lot quicker. This is because the judges would not need
to decide what type of punishment criminals would deserve as it would have been already decided for them. However, this
is an unfair practice as some of the criminals may not deserve the punishments given to them. For example, a person
robbing a convenient store will not deserve the same punishment as a person robbing a bank because the degree of the crime
is not as severe as the latter.

On the other hand, deciding a crime according to the situation and motive of it make perfect sense as it would ensure that
the lawbreaker is given a fair trial and the right punishment is handed down to him. For instance, a mentally ill person who
commits a murder would be judged accordingly, instead of being grouped into the same category of all the other type of
murderers. This, therefore, will make the trial balance and fair.

In conclusion, my opinion is that the punishment for a crime should be made up based on all the factors leading up to the
unlawful action rather than providing judgement based on the classification of crimes into types.

In recent days, there is an ongoing debate on how to give appropriate punishment toward people who accused with criminal
activities. Some state that they should be punished by looking at the type of crime they have committed, while some people
believe that the circumstance and reason of committing a crime should be given a high priority while accusing someone of
the crime. However, I personally argue that these ideas are definitely true and through this essay, I will support these views
with some considerations below.

Nowadays, the fact shows that there are some cases given an injustice punishment toward a criminal. For instance, a
grandmother stole three chocolates last year and she had to spend times in prison for several years. In contrast of the
corruptors stealing a plenty of money from society but punished only a year and completed by a good service from the
police. In short, the law of government should review and rearrange the constitution when deciding on the punishment.
They should think of the punishment types as the consideration on punishment decision.

Turing to the other arguments, the government also should pay attention to the reason why people have committed
criminalities. For example, there are some cases which show the most reason of committing crime are economic problems.
A lot of people have no job thus they prefer to do misconduct to fulfil their daily need. The most obvious solution is by
taking the motivation of criminals as an essential consideration in giving punishment.

As a result, I truly believe that these ideas are the essential consideration that can encounter the social justice.

To date, we have thousands of laws, regulations, general rules enumerated to ensure our society functions as it should be.
However, these restrictions could never be enough to cover every circumstance that happened around-the-clock. Therefore,
should the law be our gospel for us to follow strictly without deviation? Or should we perceive each case as an individual
and take multiple factors into considerations? My opinion is definitely on the latter.

For people who value law as an impregnable principle, the law itself would surpass human judgments. Humanity could be a
defection when coming to talk about righteousness. Sentiments and bias might get in the way and eventually lead to
miscalculation and unjustness, resulting in man-made errors, a horrendous failure for justice.

Despite the fact that human error is almost inevitable, people still believe taking certain factors into consideration is
genuinely legitimate. Laws are considered to the most basic requirement of human morality, making it the reason why this
issue has become controversial. People might have broken the law yet the motivation behind such deed could alter our
interpretation to it. The main character in the Opera “Les miserable” stole a loaf of bread because he was almost starved to
death; a young heroin addict pickpocketed a wallet to cater for his cravings. These two cases above are both thievery, yet the
morality standard was hardly even. Our cognition helps us reconsider and adjust our decisions and prevent us from
nonchalantly putting the same amount of punishment on these two men without pondering over some more congruous
solution.

The law could be the guidance, a foundation of our ethic standards. Nevertheless, we still have to make room for
flexibilities and consider every crime as an individual.

There is a controversial fact that whether there should be fixed punishments for crimes or the factors that might lead the
crime should be taken into consideration, while penalties for crimes are detected. In my opinion, to decide in justice both of
them are required. The circumstances brought about the crime should play a role to slight the penalty or deteriorate the
punishment.

Some people believe that each crime should be performed as a specific punishment that serves to implement the justice in a
society. In this practice, each person who did the same crime is punished as a standard punishment. For instance, the penalty
of forgery is a standard for every person. Every thief, child or adult does not matter, is convicted in the same way.

On the other hand, another group of people think that each occasion related to crime is different from one another. Because
psychology and position of guilty, environmental factors, and reasons and results of the crime affect the damage of the
crime on people or society. Accordingly, such mentioned factors should be detectable on the level of punishment. For
instance, if a person causes a traffic accident by a mistake, his position, his regret and his emotional situation should be
evaluated, when the penalty is assigned.

I personally think that each crime should be assessed specifically and fixed crimes detected beforehand should be able to
extend or lessen. Thanks to that, the intentions lied down behind the crime could be thought while deciding the crime of a
guilty. Otherwise, thieving a piece of bread because of hungry will have the same position with a theft who stole many
pieces bread to sell in another place to earn money.

In today's modern world, we are constantly bombarded with the issue of crime which has recently increased at an alarming
rate on newspapers. Some people, therefore, are of the opinion that all kinds of crime should have its own punishment
which is legislated by the government. However, there are a handful of people who assert that some background reasons,
which cause the criminals to commit crimes, should be included in the procedure of deciding on the punishment. Hence, we
will examine both sides the argument before reaching a reasonable conclusion.

A fixed punishment for each type of crime is necessary due to several reasons. To begin, it allows every criminal to be
treated fairly for every crime. It is important to ensure no one will be discriminated or get offended by the public. In
addition, there will not be any unsatisfactory between the criminals who committed the same kind of crime when they are
sentenced to the jail. Furthermore, a fixed punishment plays an indispensable role in giving a deterrent in turning the would-
be offenders. To illustrate, a serious punishment will be incurred to those who commit crimes like murders will definitely
deter and cause the would-be offenders to change their minds before committing a crime.

On the other hand, it is vital to take into account about the reasons behind why the criminals commit crimes. First of all,
many of them, especially the teenagers who are more vulnerable to those feelings of loneliness are more easily influenced
by their peers. They do not have a mature thinking and are not being aware of the possible negative impacts of committing
crimes. According to a recent research conducted in Columbia, the statistic has shown that about 58% of the youngsters got
affected by their badly behaved friends when got caught to involve in crimes. It is also believed by the public that many
criminals have the lackings of parental love which eventually causes them to behave violently and aggressively. They,
therefore, involve commit crimes including robberies and murders to show how powerful they are.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that every jury should make their decisions on punishments by considering the reasons
why they commit crimes. Our nation will surely continue to prosper and flourish in the decades to come once the crime
rates are successfully reduced.

Many people debate on what should be done about punishment on criminals. Some individuals believe that there should be
standard punishment for every kind of crime and that should be followed while sentencing a criminal. Yet, some others
argue that reasons of crime and background of executing crime should be considered while determining proper punishment
for criminals. This essay will take a look at this issue from both points of views.

To begin with, people may agree to impose fixed standard punishment on criminals based on the crime they committed. By
doing this, criminals will be punished according to the crime they made and it seems fair for everyone since they believe the
bigger the crime, the harder the prison. For example, imposing the death penalty to both murderer and terrorist who have
committed to the same type of crime seems reasonable to many people. It is a considerably equal crime and therefore, they
should be punished by death sentence. When someone kills a person, no matter what was the reason, s/he should be
punished according to the predetermined laws.

On the other hand, others argue that in determining the proper punishment for criminals, there should be some
considerations of what were the motives of crime and also the background of criminals. There must be different punishment
between a serial killer and someone who was forced to kill for self-defending. Applying same punishment to the woman
who stole a loaf of bread from a store to feed her hungry baby and a corrupt government employee who stole millions of
dollar to amass his wealth is not at all justified though stealing was the crime in both cases.

All in all, fixed punishment is needed to standardise punishment for different crimes. Nonetheless, there should be some
considerations on motives and environment of criminals in imposing the proper punishment.

Punishing people who commit crimes is crucial to maintaining law and order in a society. Some people believe that there
should be a fixed punishment for each crime. Others disagree. In their opinion, factors such as the motive behind the crime
too should be considered while deciding on the punishment. Although I agree that people who commit crimes should be
given exemplary punishment, in my opinion, the judge should also consider the circumstances that led to the crime.

If there is a fixed punishment for each crime, all people who commit murder will get the same punishment. This system will
certainly improve judgement efficiency. Since the punishment for each crime has already been given in law books, judges
only have to pronounce the verdict. Also when the punishments are consistent with regulations established previously, there
will be fewer law conflicts.

Unfortunately, the above arguments in favour of a fixed punishment are not as logical as they sound. Human behaviour is
almost always influenced by circumstances. Crime is no different. It is possible for two people who commit murders to have
entirely different motives. Perhaps one of them committed the act with the deliberate intention to kill while the other was
merely trying to save himself from the attacker while committing the murder accidentally. If there are fixed punishments for
murder, both of them will receive the same punishment. This is unfair. It is also unfair to give juveniles the same
punishment as adults. It is thus evident that serious ethical issues may arise if fixed punishments are given for each crime.

In my opinion, while awarding the punishment the judge should consider not only the severity of the crime but also the
circumstances that led to it. To conclude, it does not make sense to have fixed punishment for each crime because no two
persons who commit the same crime have the same motive.

One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether the judiciary system should adopt fixed sentences for all
crimes, or it should consider the circumstances and motivation behind each crime. In this essay, I am going to shed some
light on this question from both points of view and extend my support to the latter opinion.
On one side of the argument there are people who argue that the benefits of adopting a fixed punishment structure for the
crimes committed considerably outweigh its disadvantages. This is because fixed punishments will probably save a lot of
time and money that could otherwise be directed for use in much needed services in other sectors of the community such as
health and education. Another reason for believing this is that criminals will think twice before they commit any crime, as
they would realize that punishment is going to be swift and strict. One good illustration of this is the declined rate of crimes
in some countries that adopt a very strict and harsh punitive system.

On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in many cases there are
extenuating circumstances behind many of the crimes committed, especially the minor ones. People often have this
opinion because in many countries and communities there may be strong factors influencing crime rates such as poverty
and blackmailing. Therefore, it is crucial for judges to consider all the circumstances surrounding a defendant or a case to
issue a just and fair verdict. For instance, a young woman convicted of public misconduct may have been forced into
prostitution due to poverty. Thus, it goes without saying that their viewpoint is credible and realistic.

In my opinion, both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I tend to believe that considering the circumstances
behind each crime is paramount in order to reach a fair and just verdict in the courtroom.

Some people think that poverty is the reason behind most crimes. Do you agree or disagree?

As the larger part of the people's beliefs, the majority cause of crime commitment is destitution. In my opinion, however,
poor people motivate to sin more than others; I believe that other factors such as illiteracy and parent or friends influence
would be as important as poverty.

Lack of education is one of the crucial parameters which lead a person to commit an offense. In fact, People are taught how
to have good manner and how to decide between right or wrong ways in schools. So, analphabet persons who drop out of
school would never know about the ultimate result of their wrongdoing, hence, they are not educated about moral behavior.
Undoubtedly, parents and friends have the most significant impact on a person beliefs or even characteristics. As a matter of
fact, the youth who have criminal friends or parents easily attracts to delinquency because of the peer pressure or perhaps
the wrong pattern. So, the friends or parents effect should not underestimate.

On the other hand, to some extent, I agree with that, the poverty affected the human being's senses, but it is related to
person's decision to be a criminal or not. For example, when a needy person was starving, he/she would never attend to
well-behaved or unpleasant moral in that kind of situation but, he/she might choose to plan a shop robbery or request for
help and food or in preferable situation ask for a job with the minimum salary.

In conclusion, although, penury perhaps would be a cause of committing a minor or major offense, other important factors
such as illiteracy and parents or friends effects would have the same level of importance as poverty.

In today's world most of the prisons are getting fully accommodated by prisoners who have a poor background. Some
people have a thought lack of income sources is the reason behind most offences. I accord with the notion and in the
upcoming paragraph I will elaborate two reasons to support my viewpoint.
First and foremost, most of the people who are poor do not possess neither assets nor a source of income. These people
cannot even afford necessities like food and shelter. For instance, a survey report has shown that 56 percent of populace in a
nation cannot buy food to feed themselves. So, to buy the food items they get engaged in crime like drug dealing and sexual
rackets. In these activities a surplus amount of money can be earned so poor people get involved in these offences easily.
Secondly, most of the people of poor community are drunkards and drug addicted. This addiction become so severe that an
addicted person spends all his money on buying the products to fulfill the addiction. As an evidence, a packet of marijuana
cost about ten thousand dollars and cannot be afforded by poor. The addict starts thinking that optimum state of well being
is received only by taking injections of drugs. So, to buy these products addicts start doing crimes like kidnapping a child
and in such crimes they demand a high amount of money.
To conclude, Most criminals do a barred activity so they can eradicate their poverty and fulfill their demands like food. A
crime is also performed by drug addicts to somehow buy the drugs.

The crime rate nowadays is increasing rapidly and some people think that poverty is the main reason. I strongly disagree
with this opinion.
In my opinion, firstly, lack of education is the main explanation for most crimes. People who are provided with an
educational program know how to behave in the right way. Thus, people who drop out of school will do not know how to
act politely with others. Furthermore, on account of this, they hardly find any jobs let alone a well-paid job. The second
reason that can mention is the parents. Parents have a great enormous impact on their children so if they do not have good
manner, their children won't be able to become good citizens for society. In addition, bad characteristics such as laziness and
selfishness could also build up many offenders. It is widely known that a number of youngsters choose to steal from other
people instead of earning money on their own.

On the other hand, it is undeniable that poverty is one of the reasons that lead to crimes. Because of the hunger, many
people will choose a plan to steal or rob in order to have enough money to get by. Moreover, perharps, due to the difficulty
in finding good jobs, they are always unable to earn enough money for their families and for themselves.

In conclusion, poverty is just one of many reasons that lead to crimes. I would argue that lack of education, criminal's
background and characteristics that are the central sense for most crimes

Some Think That Fighting Poverty Is The Best Way To Reduce Crime
Nowadays, the increasing rate of crime is a cause for concern. Some people opine that a fight against poverty could help in
reducing the crime rate, whereas others think that there are more effective ways to tackle this issue. In my opinion, in
addition to reducing poverty, we need better police patrolling and stringent punishments to deal with crime.

It is often thought that that poverty is the biggest cause behind the rising offenses. Often poor people get into the criminal
world just to fulfill their basic needs. If employment is given to these people to help them survive, they can definitely be
dissuaded from committing crime. Moreover, they will not get time to think over crime because they will be busy doing
their jobs. Research shows that 80% of the criminals live below poverty line. They get involved in crime in the urge to get
something for their families. Hence, offering a source of income to these people could reduce the crime rate.

However, fighting poverty alone will not improve the situation. Not everyone who commits crime hails from a poor
background. Some are hardcore criminals and they can only be reformed with punishment. Moreover, the fear of
imprisonment could deter them from committing crime. Additionally, more police security will automatically create fear
among the criminals and they will be scared of doing anything wrong in the presence of police. For example, in Delhi, just
to give security to the female employees working in night shifts, the government has appointed more police force on
roadsides to ensure their safety.

In conclusion, tackling crime is not an easy task but the government can take proper actions to mitigate this issue. By
creating more job opportunities for the poor people, increasing police patrolling and awarding stringent punishments for
criminals, the government can reduce the crime rate to a great extent.

In order to reduce crime, some argue that attacking its cause like poverty is the best solution, while others believe
that putting more people in prisons and having more policemen are more convenient way in tackling crime. Discuss
both sides and give your opinion.

Band 9 essay sample

Reducing the crime rate is crucial to ensuring the safety and security of people living in a particular society. While some
people are in favour of building more prisons and increasing the number of policemen, others feel that achieving
economic welfare is the key to tackling crime. In my opinion, all of these measures are required to fight crime
effectively.

There are several benefits to increasing the number of policemen patrolling the streets. They will act as a deterrent and force
offenders to think twice before engaging in robbery or shoplifting. They will also increase the sense of safety among law-
abiding citizens. It is equally important to punish those engaging in criminal activities. They are a threat to the life and
property of people and hence they should be kept in confinement. The hardships that they face in the prison and the
subsequent social alienation may reform at least some of them.
Perhaps a better solution to reduce the crime rates is to ensure financial security for everyone. Studies have shown that most
criminals have poor financial backgrounds. In most cases, it is their poverty that compels them to commit criminal deeds. If
the government can create more jobs and provide economic security for all the people, the crime rates will automatically
drop. Of course, this will require the government to invest more in education and vocational training. Educated and trained
people will be able to create jobs themselves. They are also less likely to get into crime.

To conclude, tackling crime is a tough task and the government has to employ all possible means to achieve this. This will
involve deploying more policemen on the streets, putting criminals behind the bars and ensuring economic security for all
the people.

Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor. What are some of the
reasons for poverty? What can we do to help the poor?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

Sample Answer 1:
There has been a dramatic increase in poverty in some developing and underdeveloped countries over the last few years.
This has affected large numbers of people and hiked up their woes. Illiteracy, unemployment, inflation and unstable
economic conditions are few factors that have contributed immensely to poverty. However, people’s suffering could be
mitigated by providing them health, education and job opportunities.

It is often seen that people are reluctant to send their children to educational institutions in poor countries. These institutions
could help them in educating and changing their destiny. Despite its benefits, people would like to indulge their children in
some paid work, which could not help significantly in altering their present conditions. Furthermore, due to uncertain
circumstances of the country, there is a price hike of various basics items that are mandatory for daily life. Exorbitant prices
of others goods and transportation also badly affected people financial matters.

The government can play a pivotal role to eradicate poverty from society. There should be attempts by the government to
provide vocational training to poor people. That will enable them to find a good job based on their skills. Moreover, there
should be free education for poor peoples; these people should be awarded a scholarship for higher studies based on their
lofty performances.

To sum up, I would like to say that government should take preemptive measures to reduce poverty by giving them
professional training and educational facilities. The state could also support financially to poor families if there is no one to
provide basic amenities of life to them. It is also government duty to ensure that hapless people should not be deprived off
from basic life necessities.

Sample Answer 2:
It is undeniable that every nation faces the poverty problem at some point in its history and they all have their own specific
ways in addressing the issue. Poverty is a pressing issue in many parts of the world and effective steps are quite important to
solve this problem. The following essay will discuss some of the reasons that lie beneath the issue and some of the solutions
to resolve it.

For a number of reasons, poverty has become an issue in many countries in the world. Firstly, some countries have a large
population of poor people due to the poor performance of the governments. For example, under the dictatorial presidentship,
many people are facing starvation due to the fact they have a greedy leader who concentrates more on the personal gains
than people's betterment. Secondly, certain countries are facing poverty problem due to the unfavourable geographical areas.
For instance, certain countries in Africa are facing starvation problem due to the drought issue. Thirdly, some nations have
poverty-stricken people in their area because many of these people are lazy and not interesting in working. Some people in
developed countries are given allowance from the governments, and they misuse the fund. Instead of using the money to
buy basic needs and searching for jobs, many of them just buy drugs and get drunk. This causes destitution for many people
and they cannot come above the poverty line. Lack of natural resources, poor education and lack of trade facility are three
major reasons many Asian countries are still poor.

There are several things that United Nations and governments could do to resolve the poverty problem globally. One of
them is that United Nations should give more attention to countries where political instability is the main reason people
starve every day. The UN must make intense diplomatic negotiation to reunite people and make them into a free democratic
country. As for countries that have unfavourable landscape, the UN could cooperate with local governments in building
dams and other facilities. With the existence of UN provided facilities, it is hoped that many countries could manage their
irrigation, natural resources and manpower to improve their condition. Lastly, for people who are idle and become alcoholic,
the allowance for them should be stopped. Instead of giving them the money, it could be allocated for treating their
addiction and for creating job opportunities for them.

In conclusion, many countries have poverty issue, as they have corrupted government, no natural resources, or adverse
geographical condition. There are several things that the UN and governments could do to resolve the issue, but the most
important one is to change the political condition and help them utilise their own resources.

Many people today are worried about ‘cybercrime’ such as hacking and identity theft. What problems does
‘cybercrime’ cause, and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take?
Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience.
cyber crime has been escalating rapidly and many people are suffered with problems of loss of personnel data and
corruption of business details and agendas. However, in this essay explain about some detrimental effects of this crime and
reckon the possible solutions to tackles this issues. Mainly, the most major problem associated with the online crime that,
privacy issues and misusing the professional descriptions which may solute by stringent software updates and legislation.

Personnel and social identity theft would be the result of unauthorized entry of virus and malware product by the hackers,
which may lead to deleterious effect on individual, family, and society. In brief, people could have facing the problem with
the personnel information's namely, address, phone numbers, bank details, accounts, and files by the hackers and the
challengers. This would make problems between the relationships, work place, companies and even presumably countries.
For instance, a big issue with USA election by the cyber crime associated with hacking and attacking huge developments
and secrets of American parliament. Moreover, by this impact, people have issues with physically and psychologically such
as, misusing photos, and identities, bank savings and so on. For example, many young men and female students would have
facing issues with this crime in order to misusing photos from social medias, anonymous provocative calls and transferring
moneys from accounts.

However, government should legislate over such crimes in terms of sentence, punishments, whereas, software and online
marketers would enforce good software and preventive measures irrespective of face and gender. Firstly, an appropriate
rules and regulations, agreement license, must be followed by government officials. Identify the malware groups, hackers,
and constitution over such threats and confining the problems in future. Secondly, online companies and software
programmers would develop prominent software to identify the hackers to large extent. Meanwhile, instruct the customers
to technical prevention's like changing password intermittent, make strong codes with intricacy. Furthermore, inform to the
dealers about privacy issues or noticed threats to the authority as early as possible like a government of India tackled a
hacker by the innovative software recently by this method.

To sum up, online hacking and theft would be a rising phenomenon, this may lead to crisis in personnel, social and national
controversy. Although, there were many choices to be prevent and mitigate cyber crime by the united help of government
and online dealers and software.

Cybercrime is an ever-growing problem today, as so many people use various forms of technology to store and transmit
sensitive data. These crimes present a number of problems and people are getting more concerned about them. In this essay,
I will discuss the issues and discuss the measures as to how we can tackle them.
Firstly, cyber crimes are mostly money oriented. They have huge financial impacts on banks and insurance companies. An
individual whose bank account details have been compromised is due a full refund for the amount affected according to the
monetary laws of U.S section 181. Furthermore, the money stolen could be used for funding other crimes like terrorism and
drug trafficking. The stress caused by these crimes could be gruesome. Individuals who are affected will need to cope up
with various issues and fill in loads of paperwork to get their money back. Moreover, it may take weeks or even months
before the funds are allocated back to them
To speak of solutions, the most important thing is to improve security. This can be done by educating people of the causes of
cyber crime and providing appropriate measures such as using strong passwords and checking for website’s authentication
before filling in your bank details. Stringent laws should be put in place and a universal governing body for the same should
be set up as to put everybody under the same set of laws. Most of the crimes committed online are traced to different parts
of the world. With more strict policies, criminals will be worrisome of their actions and won’t be able to hide behind the
barrier of international borders.
In the end, cyber crime is growing at an alarming rate and the problems caused by it are both financial and social.
Governments, individuals and corporations should co-ordinate with each other to prevent any further damages.

Cybercrime is a cause of widespread concern today as many people use technology to store and transmit sensitive data. This
essay will highlight several key issues related to this kind of crime as well as recommend some practical solutions to cope
with them.

There are some problems stemming from this phenomenon. Perhaps the worst issue is the financial impact. If someone has
his or her bank account emptied or false credit lines created under their name, they are potentially liable for large sums of
money. Even if they can avoid the consequences, their bank or finance company has to cover the losses, which can damage
their performance. Another problem is that these stolen funds can be used to subsidize crimes such as drug distribution or
even terrorism. To be more specific, once the money enters the criminal networks, people have no way of knowing how it
will be used. Last but not least, there is the problems of stress and anxiety caused to the innocent victims of these crimes,
which might last for many months or even years. It leads to a sense of insecurity as an unavoidable result.

Some measures should be taken to alleviate this trend. Firstly, probably the most effective measure is to improve personal
security, ranging from passwords to the shredding of documents. This denies the criminals the raw materials to work with.
Secondly, authorities should raise awareness of the risks among the elderly or the very young people – two group who are
often specifically targeted – through publicity and public education. However, it is finance companies who can make the
greatest contribution, by increasing their security and detection systems.

In conclusion, the problems, both financial and social, are identified and the solutions should involve coordinated action by
individuals, corporations and the state.

(295 words)

Internet crime is increasing rapidly as more and more people are using the internet to make financial transactions.
What can be done to tackle this problem ?
It is a fact and truth that internet crime is increasing rapidly as more and more people are using the internet to make
financial transactions. Internet has become ubiquitous owing to its versatility. What is it not that you can't do with internet?
It is the god of the modern era! Almost everything is connected to cyberspace. Everything is available on internet and social
networking sites and platforms. There is not a single sphere or walk of life where social networking and media are not being
used! Education, industry, finance, defense, teaching, learning, research, medicine, accounting, entertainment, internet,
online teaching, telecommunication, media, and space research and exploration.

Internet and computers have created such an order in every field. They are so adroitly efficient in data storing and handling.
They have made man's life much more organized, systematic, simple, colourful, and awesomely efficient. Experts and
skilled personnel in all spheres are using this cyberspace. From ticket booking to e-banking; from online shopping to e-
learning; from working online to receiving emoluments for the work done online; from receiving your medical diagnosis
reports to paying your income tax online, almost everything is being done in this cyberspace.

However, this ease of doing work provided by cyberspace has also posed serious threats to an individual’s personal safety
and security. Cybercrime incidents are on the increase. Hacking, counterfeit calls, online frauds, etc. have become everyday
affairs.
Internet is being used immensely to do financial transactions. So, crimes related to this have also increased. Some people
with deep internet knowledge are trying to cheat people by deceitfully accessing users’ financial data on internet and by
accessing their password and PIN’s.

Since cyberspace is going to be more prevalent in future, and its use is going to increase more in every sphere of life, people
should adopt it in their life with caution and responsibility.

The need of the hour is to take precautions and cautions in the use of this cyberspace. The Government must provide potent
foolproof safety measures so that there is no misuse of this wonderful cyberspace. People who use internet to do financial
transactions should also use caution by protecting their data and passwords.

Internet crime is increasing rapidly as more and more people around the world are accessing the internet.
What are the worst internet crimes?
How can they be preventend?

In the last decade the global access to the internet by people has increased, causing the growth of internet crime. Some of
the crimes are minor. but others such as sexual harassment and the spread of fake news are problems that have to be
prevented.

Parents are always worried when their children start to surf the internet on their own and they have the reason to. One of the
most common crime on the internet is sexual harassment, a crime that has risen a lot in recent years thanks to the birth of
social networks. Usually the teenagers are the ones that are affected the most by this phenomenon and it is not always easy
for a young girl or a young boy to understand what is happening and to talk about that with their parents or with the
authorities.

Another big problem of the internet and in particular of social networks is the spread of fake news, invented with the aim of
influencing the public opinion. Certain people in order to make their personal interest make up news and exploit the fact that
thanks to social networks, they will become viral in few hours. People on the internet are usually not aware of this
possibility and do not check the source of the news to verify the authenticity.

Social networks administrators have to be aware of these problems and prevent them in a shared effort with the police. More
control is needed and it is necessary to make people know about these crimes in order to recognise them. It is also important
to enhance the possibility of police intervention by intensifying the punishments, as a deterrent.

In conclusion, the rising popularity of the internet crimes has to be faced more severely and the social networks themselves
have to do an important part in this.

Worldwide web or internet is considered to be the one of the mankind's greatest invention, nowadays almost everything is
run through this platform. As it's potential uses increased the threats also raised accordingly. Every system is vulnerable no
matter how secure it is, that is the kind of situation everyone is facing right now. Presently countries are struggling to deal
with this new problem of "internet crimes", despite of number of measures it is still on the rise.

Hacking is the greatest threat which is faced by the internet world right now. Unauthorized access of any kind of
information on the internet is referred to as hacking. Criminals use these informations to their own benefit. For instance,
recently some hackers gained access to many of the famous celebrities social media accounts and posted all of their personal
photos and details on online. This resulted doubts in the security features of so called social media platforms.

Furthermore, malware attacks are other kind of internet risk which is faced by almost all the mail users. It is a process by
which stealing an individuals personal details from his computer using malicious programs. In addition, when e-payments
gained its popularity a new kind fraud 'Pharming' came along with it. Which involves stealing of financial information of
individuals or companies by creating forged websites.

To tackle these problems companies, individuals and regimes need to straighten their internet security by installing
sophisticated firewalls and security softwares in their platforms.In addition, people need to be very careful when they are
surfing on the internet or using their personal details over the web. On top of that authorities should introduce strict rules
and regulations to control internet crimes and it's consequences.
In the last decade global access to the internet has increased, causing the growth of internet crime. Some of the crimes are
minor, but others, such as sexual harassment and the spreading of fake news, are problems that have to be addressed.

Parents are always worried when their children start to surf the internet on their own and they have the reason to. One of the
most common crimes on the internet is sexual harassment; a crime that has risen a lot in recent years thanks to the birth of
social networks. Usually, teenagers are the ones that are affected the most by this phenomenon and it is not always easy for
a young girl or a young boy to understand what is happening and to talk about that with their parents or with the authorities.

Another big problem with the internet and in particular with social networks, is the spread of fake news, invented with the
aim of influencing public opinion. Certain people in order to make their personal interest make up news and exploit the fact
that thanks to social networks, they will become viral in few hours.

Social network administrators have to be aware of these problems and prevent them in a shared effort with the police. More
control is needed and it is necessary to make people aware of these crimes in order to recognise them. It is also important to
enhance the possibility of police intervention by increasing punishments as a deterrent.

In conclusion, the rising popularity of internet crimes has to be faced more severely and the social networks themselves
have an important role to play in this.

Cyber crime is broadly defined by technology company,as any offences that are commited using a computer,network or
hardware devices.It is not new occurence so many people are worriying about accessing internet.There are such pivotal
kinds of crimes such as the spread of anonymous accounts and the duplication of original accounts.

Firstly,the copying of primary account is the biggest case to people who access to internet in order to do personal or
business banking.For this reason,being cautious when giving out personal detail information such as financial information
on the internet.There are many trickster people

who are using the internet to threaten to cause damage with the intent to exort from any person or other thing of
value.Secondly,anonymously accessing in it to annoy , abuse ,threaten,or harass the person who receives the communication
is a deceptive manner for somebody.

There are many steps to hinder as possible being trap.The first step could be constantly updating your personal information,
thus preserved throughout accessing to web.The second step,installing security programs in computer would protect agains
cyber criminals.In this way could be helpfull to be guarante that your privately owned knowledge could not be taken hold
unauthorized.

To conclude , internet crimes are more pivotal offense related to people lives and getting danger for people,who are
continuously users, but taking for guarante your personal information you have to be cautious and set the security programs
are livesaving opinion to far away from any crimes.