Spatial Development of Riga Past Present

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 59

Spatial Development of Riga

Past, Present and Future

Miguel Oliveira
(Geographer/Town Planner from Lisbon Nova University)
Center for Urban History, 17 September, 2013
Contact: [email protected]

Special Credits to Andis Kublacovs (University of Latvia)


Summary

Introduction
 Location and Population

Past
 Spatial Development of Riga throughout it s history

Present and Future


 Riga Current Spatial Development
 Historic Centre of Riga – Art Nouveau and Wooden Heritage
 Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018
 Riga Planning Issues Today
Location of Riga

Location in Europe Location in Latvia


Riga Location
Daugava river (1005 km)
Flows through Russia, Belarus and
Latvia, and has been a major
penetration route into the large land
mass of extreme Easter Europe since
ancient times” (Grava, 1993)

Different Rulers:

German (12-15th century)


Polish (16th century)
Swedish (17th century)
Russian Empire (1721-1917)
German (1917-1918)
Independent (First Period 1921-1940)
Soviet Union (1940-1941)
Nazi Germany (1941-1944)
Soviet Union (1944-1991)
Independent again since 1991

Riga Aerial View nowadays


Population of Riga

 Population of 697 374 –


(about 30% of the national
population)

 1.15 million people in Riga


agglomeration

 Total area of the city is about


304,2 km2

 The third largest city in the


Baltic Sea region

Source: Riga City Council (2013)


Spatial Development of Riga
(13th century – 16th century)
Founded in 1201, the city was
initially established between the
Riga canal and the River Daugava

Riga assumed considereable


proeminence during the Middle
Ages as Hanseatic Town

The old town got it s present


shape during the 14th to 16th
centuries and it covers 35 hectares

By this time the town


surrounded by a wall with towers
extended across almost all of the
area between the two rivers

Source: Kublacovs (2012)


Spatial Development of Riga
(13th century – 16th century)
The old town had a medieval urban fabric – narrow and winding streets, low
and closely-attached buildings market and gathering places. Churches were the
main features

St. Peter s Church (built in 1209) Dom Cathedral (1211)


Spatial Development of Riga
(17th century)
Swedish Times

The first professional urban


planning in Riga started
in the year 1641, by Swedish
war engineer J. Rodenburg
together with the colonel
Werenscheld

Plan included a fortification


plan with 12 new bastions, a
moat and regular street
network (this project was
implemented partly just in
the current area of Moscow
neighborhood)
Source: Kublacovs (2012)
Spatial Development of Riga
(19th century)
Russian Empire

In accordance with Russian military


regulations, only wooden buildings were
permitted in the suburbs.

 In the possibility of war, the suburbs


could be detroyed, something that did
actually take place in 1812.

When they were rebuilt, the suburbs


generally retained their previous plan

In the mid-nineteenth century, Riga


was a fortress surrounded by suburbs of
wooden houses

Source: Kublacovs
Riga in 1840 (2012)
Spatial Development of Riga
(19th century)
Russian Empire

In 1856, the Russian Tsar gave


permission to demolish the ramparts,
and it was prepared a plan for
transforming the area of the former
fortress into a new area called
“Esplanade”

One of the most important features of


the urban plan was the canal

The plan also included boulevards that


were created around Old Riga, which
were lined with blocks of apartment
buildings alternated with parks and
public buildings (Krastins, 2006)
Master plan (1856) by city architect Johann
Daniel Felsko and architect Otto Dietze for the
area of the former fortress of Riga Source: Krastins
(2006)
Spatial Development of Riga
(19th and 20th century)
Russian Empire

First railway line opened in Riga in 1860 marked the beginnings of


industrialization period and the development of suburbs and factories

 At the beginning of the twentieth century, Riga experienced the most rapid
economic growth in the history of the city and the Port of Riga at that time had the
highest turnover in the Russian Empire

Prosperity in industry, trade and culture generated an unprecedented expansion of


building activity, namely multi-storey buildings in the former suburbs

Most of the masonry buildings here were constructed on the site of earlier wooden
buildings, nevertheless, many nineteenth century wooden buildings have been
preserved

Riga First Railway Bridge (1872)


Spatial Development of Riga
(19th century)
Russian Empire

Source: Kublacovs
(2012)

Industrialization and development of suburbs in Riga (1879)


Spatial Development of Riga
(19th century)

Source: Kublacovs
(2012)

Bird s eye view of Riga (1895)


Spatial Development of Riga
(20th century)
Russian Empire

In the beginning of the XX century was created the first garden city in Europe, called
Mežaparka г“Forest Park”) with an area of 11,821 km²

During the WWII a concentration camp г“Kaiserwald”) was located in this park

Today it s residents are among the wealthiest of the city and it s a popular destination for
sport and leisure activities
Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century

Second World War

Almost one third of the most valuable buildings of Old Riga were destroyed

Source: Kublacovs
(2012)
Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century

Heritage of the Period of Soviet


occupation (1944 – 1991)

New urban master plans


(GenPlan)

That included spatial changes


namely:

Construction of large scale


housing project “mikrorayons”
(Imanta Case Study)

Industrial and Railroads Belts (VEF


Factory Case study) and Green Belts

Construction of regime symbols


and impressive landmarks in the
skyline

Source: Grava (1993)


Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century
Riga GenPlan 1985
Heritage of the Period of Soviet
occupation (1944 – 1991)

General Plan (GenPlan)

New urban master plans (GenPlan)


were approved in 1955, 1969 and in
1983

The Genplan was almost entirely


physical in nature it was secret and
there was no public review of the
Genplan

In the case of a capital of a Soviet


republic, regulatory bodies in Moscow
were directly involved in the approval
(Grava, 1993)

Source: Grava (1993)


Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century
Period of Soviet
occupation (1944 – 1991)
Mikrorayons
(neighborhood unit)

They were created outside


the city’s railway ring in
accordance with the GenPlans

The five mikrorayons of


Imanta new community at the
western periphery of Riga.
The schools (H-shaped
buildings) tend to be located
in the interiors of mikrorayons;
the service centres are found
along the edges (Grava, 1993)

Imanta Mikrorayon Source: Grava (1993)


Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century
Imanta Mikrorayon - Population of 49 698 (2010)
Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century
Industrial Belt - Case Study of VEF Factory (State Electrotechnical Factory)

Founded in 1919, it specialized in


manufacturing electrical and electronic
products

Before WWII it manufactured large


different products mostly related to
communication

After the WWII war it was the


leading communication technology
producer in the Soviet Union

In its peak in 1991, VEF employed


20,000 people

Street View Soviet first transistor


radio produced in VEF
“Spidola” г1960)
Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century
Period of Soviet occupation (1944 – 1991)
Town Hall Square

One basic concept of Soviet city


planning was to have a central square
that could be used for mass gatherings,
rallies and parades

In Riga, the Soviets made the Town Hall


square into their central square

This square was never successfull or


popular among locals (Wilson, 1993)

Source: Wilson(1993)
Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century
Period of Soviet occupation (1944 – 1991)
Skyline Landmarks

Construction of Riga
Radio and TV Tower
(1986), with a height
368 metres

Construction of the
Latvian Academy of
Science (1956), with a
height of 108 metres
Spatial Development of Riga – XX Century
Evolution of Population in Riga during the 19th and 20th Century

Source: Grava (1993)


Spatial Development of Riga – XX and XXI Century

After Latvia Independence (1991)

After Latvia regaining its independence, Reconstruction of the


and after the second half of the 1990s a “House of Blackheads”

construction boom started in the city

 Efforts have been made to build and


restore historical buildings in the old town
and an attempt to regain cultural symbols Museum of
lost after Second World War Occupattion former
Museum of Riflemen

Building in the suburbs increased, including


Office and Commercial shopping centers

In 1995 and 2006 new master plans were


created by Riga City Council

Office and Shopping Center


Swedbank Central Office
“Valdemara юentres”
Riga Current Spatial Development
The spatial structure of the city of Riga (area of 304.05 km2) is highly mono-
centric with the main city core on the right bank of the Daugava, where the historical
centre of the city is located
The inhabitants not residing in the city centre have often to come to the centre,
because the centres at the proximity of their places of residence do not provide full
service function

Data:

 Residential area covers 26% of the land in Riga, and it is mostly


concentrated in the central part of the city on either side of the railway ring that
is located on both sides on the Daugava

 In 2004, about 44% of the city area is covered by the natural areas
(including waterways), which is more than Stockholm (40%), Helsinki (35%)
Tallinn (20%), Dublin (12%) or Amsterdam (7%)

 Only the land water sites together occupy almost 16% of space of the city
(Riga City Council, 2005)
Comparative Spatial Development of Riga and other cities

Source:Betraud (2003)
Riga Density Profile
Population Density Profile in the Built Up Area

Source: Betraud (2003)


The Historic Centre of Riga UNESCO World Heritage Site
On 6 December 1997 the historic centre of Riga with
an area of 435 hectares and about 4000 buldings (1.43 per
cent of the total area of the city and its protection area
(5.13 per cent of the total area of the city) were inscribed
in UNESCO’s World Heritage List.

Riga has unique urban and architectural features:

High quality medieval urban structure and well preserved

Unparallel wooden architecture from the 19thcentury

Art Nouveau architecture (from the end of the 19th century


and beginning of 20th century)
Riga Present - Old Town
Freedom
Monument

Riga
Canal

Livu
Square

Dome Square

Town Hall Square


Riga wooden heritage - Map

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
The wooden heritage of Riga
Examples

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
The wooden heritage of Riga
Examples

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
The wooden heritage of Riga - Examples

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
The wooden heritage of Riga - Examples

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Art Nouveau heritage of Riga - Map

Art Noveau/Jugendstil
centre was created in the
end of 19th century and
beginning of the 20th
century

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Art Nouveau architecture of Riga

Height
limitation of
21.3m (5
storey)

Because of
Riga City
regulations
before WW2

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Art Nouveau architecture of Riga

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Riga Spatial Plan for 2006-2018

Strategic Priorities:

Creative city based on European


values

High quality culture life

Educated and skillful society

Economic growth based on


international cooperation

Life in the city with high quality


neighbourhoods

Long Term Development Vision - “Riga is an opportunity for everyone”


Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018
Perspective of Spatial Structure of the city

Source: Riga City Council (2005)


Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Old Town District

The Old Town of Riga, which is included in the list of


the world heritage of UNESCO, is the urban historical core
of the city

It has specific regulations defined by the


Comprehensive Plan of the Historical Centre of
Riga and Its Protection Belt

In this territory there is a big variety of functions. They


should be maintained, with an emphasis on the
representative, cultural, tourism and housing functions
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

New centre of Riga

Planned as the contrasting, modern accent on the left bank of


the river Daugava on the opposite side to Old Riga.

It is the territory, which is similar to the historical centre as concerns


the variety of functions, though business functions take more
important role.

Facilitate development on the left bank of the river Daugava


and to create some new vertical accents in the generally calm city
skyline,

Decrease the transport load on the existing city centre that


has very limited capacity as the historical street network may not be
changed

Planned that this area will house the new National Library, the
Swedbank
Central office
Acoustic Concert Hall and also the Administrative Complex of (2004)
Riga City Council
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

New National
Library of Latvia
“юastle of Light”

Architect
Gunart Birkerts

Scheduled to
open in 2013
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

New development areas around inside of the railway ring in the


territory of former port or industrial territories.

Territories whose current economic use of


which does not correspond to their potential
use, and there is a need for their revitalization.

Urban regeneration of the city centre


and the old industrial belt areas into
mixed-use residential, commercial, services
and recreational environment (Riga City
Council, 2005)

Example of Skanste and Andrejsala

Skanste recent
buildings (top right)
and Arena Riga (right)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018
Example: Andrejsala Project

Currently being developed and it has become a creative cluster, bringing


together the professionals of audio, visual arts, architecture, information
technology, design and other industries
New cultural centrality in the city including business, residential, tourist and
recreational activities

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Source:(Dripe, Janis)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

New development areas or centre building territories outside the


railway ring

To a great extent is the same as to the territories mentioned previously, but they are
located a little bit distant from the city centre in the nodes of the perspective transport
junctions

The basic functions in these areas should be commercial, services and residential
functions

Very flexible construction regulations are provided for these territories –


e.g. higher building intensities, bigger number of storeys etc. According to the plan.
such an approach should attract attention of investors to otherwise
rundown and geotechnically problematic areas

Example: Podrags neighbourhood г„Northern centre”), Lucavsala neighbourhood and


Ciekurkalnsneighbourhood г„Ezermala centre”)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Local Centres

Predominantly residential neighbourhoods


of Riga, where more various services would
be preferable, thus improving the functionality
and attraction of these areas.

Most of these centers allow multifunctionality


and high building intensity but also demand to Agenskalns historical neighbourhood
the new projects to have at least 30% but
no more than 70% of the buildings as
housing stock.

Goal:
Decrease demand for the movement to the other
districts

Central axis of Purvciems neighbourhood (G.Astra street)

Souce: Kublacovs (2012)


Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Other building territories

For example, industrial territories, some


residential areas, commercial areas, utility areas
etc.)

The industrial territories are being diminished


and the main goal is to transform them into
mixed-use areas, that may contain also some
manufacturing functions.

One of the few new areas planned for the


development of manufacturing industries, is located in
the noise zone of the Riga Airport.

Another goal is the relocation of Port territory,


closer to the estuary of the river Daugava, into a
smaller area.

Riga Airport (top) and Riga Port (bottom)


Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

Nature and greenery area

It is formed of different units such


as parks, squares, forests, specially
protected nature territories,
cemeteries, water objects or
allotments

The biggest of these areas are


located in the periphery of the city

Mezaparks (top), Riga Canal (bottom left) and Uzvaras Park (bottom right)
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

System of highways and arterial


roads of the city

Problem:

Existence of congestion, namely in the


Daugava River bridges and railway
crossings

Access to Riga port mainly through the


historical center

Fragmented network of streets drag


traffic in the city center;

“Northern Corridor” Project

New 30km long inner city highway

Source: http://www.ziemelukoridors.lv/
Riga Spatial Plan 2006-2018

“Northern Corridor” Project

Source:
http://www.ziemelukoridors.lv/
Riga Planning Issues
Environment and sustainable mobility Policies
Environment:

The Riga Flooding Plan includes the


development of a digital 3D model for the
whole territory of Riga

Sustainable Mobility

Riga has an elevated cycling potencial


(Riga City Council, 2010)

Modernization of Trams

First Park-and-Ride (P+R) facilities opened


in 2012
Riga Planning Issues - Identity

Riga's 58 neigbourhoods
(apkaimes)

Delimitation based on factors


such as type of construction, the
physical limits of the landscape,
and local sense of identity.

Goals:

Compare statistic data and


improve social infraestrutucure

Reinforce a sense of identity


(Miklasa, 2010), and stimulate
indirectly the public participation
in city planning issues.
Д ку за у а у!
Thank you for your attention!
Obrigado pela vossa atenção!

Any additional questions or suggestions contact me:


[email protected]
Bibliography:

Bertraud (2003), Alain. "Note on Riga Spatial Structure."


Dripe, Janis, “A Competitive identity for Riga,” Advisor to the Ministor of Culture
Grava(1993),S “The Urban Heritage of the Soviet Regime. The Case of Riga, Latvia.”
Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 59 No. 1 (Winter).
Wilson (1992), Richa, “The Purpose of the Past: Riga Faces it's Future [Transformation and Conservation in Historic.
Environments]”. Journal Issue: Places, 8(1).
Kublacovs (2008), Andis, “Urban Regeneration and Strengthening of Local Neighbourhoods –the Way of Riga”, 44th
ISOCARP Congress “Spatial Planning Challenges and Ideas of Riga”.
Kublacovs (2011), Andis, “Riga Northern Transport Corridor –project that respects liveability and resilience of the city” ,
Head of Project Management and Development Unit, City Development Department, Riga City Council , Open Session
“яelivering better and resilient cities” at ITA-AITES World Tunnelling and Underground Space Congress in Helsinki, May 24
Krastiņš (2006), Jānis, “Architecture and Urban Development of Art Nouveau—Metropolis Riga” International Review of
Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie Volume 16, Issue 2,
Miklasa (2010), Margarita “Planning: Latvia, Riga, Neighbourhood”.:Presentation at Tallin City Development, Student of
spatial development planning. argarita from University of Latvia
Riga City Council (2005), “Spatial Plan for Riga 2006 – 2018” , Rigas dome.
Riga City Council (2010), “юycling development in Riga”, by Askolds Kļaviņš and Igors Zujevs
Riga City Council (2013), “Riga Economic Profile”, Rigas dome.

You might also like