Production Theory
Production Theory
Production Theory
Theory of
into output
• Such process of adding value may • Typically the production analysis of a firm is
occur by done using two distinguished time frame, Short
Run (SR) and Long Run (LR)
– Change in form
• Input to output, say steel to car • In SR, supply or availability of some of the
inputs of production is fixed
Factors of Production
Fixed Input & Variable Input
• Land: It not only incorporate dry surface
• Fixed Input – Level cannot be altered of the earth but also natural resources
rapidly with production in short-run. e.g. on or under the earth surface like
Building, Plant, Technology forests, rivers, sunlight, minerals etc.
– Return from land is called rent
• Variable Input – Level can be altered • Labour: Physical or mental effort that
according to the changes in production undertakes the production process. It
level. e.g. Labour, Raw Material can be unskilled, semi-skilled or skilled
– Return for labour is called wages or salery
1
Factors of Production Production Function
• It is the technical relationship between inputs
• Capital: Wealth which is used for further
and output
production and of two types
• A commodity may be produced by various
– Physical capital: equipments, buildings, methods using different combination of inputs
intermediately goods with given state of technology
– Human capital: Knowledge, skills and – Power can be produced from coal, gas,
investment made by people through renewables etc with subcritical, super-critical or
education and training that help to produce SPV technology
better goods and services
• Production function includes all such
– Return for capital is interest
technically efficient methods
2
Table showing TP, AP & MP Production Function
L Q AP MP With One Variable Input
0 0 - - K=2 Total, Marginal, and Average Product of Labor, and Output Elasticity
1 52 52 52
2 112 56 60
3 170 56.7 58
4 220 55 50
5 258 51.6 38
6 286 47.7 28
7 304 43.4 18
8 314 39.3 10
9 318 35.3 4
10 314 31.4 -4
3
Law of Variable Proportion or Law of Variable Proportion or
Law of Diminishing Returns Law of Diminishing Returns
• G is the point of inflection in TP curve • AP starts falling to the right of H/
• G/ is the corresponding point on MPL curve where • G/ to J/ Region of diminishing returns;
MP attend its maximum value and starts falling MP>0
thereafter
• At point J, TP reaches its maximum value
• So, till G/ , increasing returns, MP max & and falling thereafter
MP>AP
4
• A firm produces output according to the production
function Q = 10KL2 – L3, where K denotes capital stock
and L denotes no. of workers it hires. Suppose K = 10
Derive APL & MPL
At what level of labour does DMR sets in?
At what level of labour APL is highest?
Production in the long run
Ans:
MPL =∂Q/ ∂L = 200L – 3L2
APL = Q/L = 10KL – L2 = 100L – L2
DMRS ∂(MPL)/ ∂L=0200-6L=0; L=33.33
Av Product max ∂(APL)/ ∂L=0 L=50
10 20 c
5
Diminishing marginal rate of factor substitution:
Properties of Isoquants (or marginal rate of technical substitution)
6
Right Angled Isoquants Production With Two Variable Inputs
Perfect Substitutes Perfect Complements:
Fixed Coefficient Technology
• When capital is perfect compliment
for labour, implying non existence of
any substitutability between two factors,
such isoquants are right angled
7
An isocost
Isocost Lines
Assumptions • So, isocost line is the locus of points of all the
r = Rs.20 000
different combination of capital and labour
w = Rs10 000 that a firm can employ, given the total cost
Units of capital (K)
Producer’s Equilibrium
Producer’s Equilibrium
• To be economically efficient, a producer must
determine the combination of inputs that
produces the output at minimum cost • Combining isoquants and isocost lines
would help us to understand Producer’s
• The maximum output level for any firm is equilibrium
determined by isoquants,
• The lowest cost of producing a given
– but they would not give the minimum cost of level of output is the point where the
production, isoquant is tangent to isocost line
• For this we need isocost line
8
Optimal Combination of Inputs Producer’s Equilibrium
MRTS = w/r • The lowest cost of producing a given level of
output is given at point E, where the isoquant
corresponding to output 10Q is tangent to isocost
line AB
Expansion Path
Optimal Combination of Inputs
• Thus, determination of optimal combination of • Expansion path is define as the line formed
imperfectly substitutable inputs depend on both by joining the tangency points between
their relative price and on the degree to which various isocost lines and the corresponding
they can be substituted for one another highest attainable isoquants
• It is a LR phenomenon
9
Returns to Scale Returns to Scale
Constant Increasing Decreasing
Production Function Q = f(L, K) Returns to Returns to Returns to
Scale (CRS) Scale (IRS) Scale (DRS)
Q = f(hL, hK)
If = h, then f has constant returns to scale.
If > h, then f has increasing returns to scale.
If < h, the f has decreasing returns to scale.
10
Indian Plywood manufactures and sells lumber, plywood, veneer,
particle board, medium-density fiberboard, and laminated beams.
The company has estimated the following multiplicative
production function for basic lumber products in the Pacific
Northwest market using monthly production data over the past
two and one-half years (30 observations): A. -0.4%
Q = b0 Lx Ky Ez (Lab, Cap, Energy)
Each of the parameters of this model was estimated by
regression analysis. Estimated coefficients with their std errors B. = 0.4(-0.05) + 0.2(-0.05) = -0.03 or -3%
in brackets are as follows
b0 = 0.9 (0.6); x= 0.4 (0.1); y= 0.4(0.2); and z= 0.2 (0.1)
A. Estimate the effect on output of a 1% decline in worker hours
(holding K and E constant).
C. x+y+z = 0.4 + 0.4 + 0.2 = 1 indicating
B. Estimate the effect on output of a 5% reduction in machine hours constant returns to scale. This means
availability accompanied by a 5% decline in energy input (holding that a 1% increase in all inputs will lead
L constant).
to a 1% increase in output
C. Estimate the returns to scale for this production system.
B. Assuming the cost of additional pump size is $600 per This implies ∂H = -66.67 ∂D or ∂D = -0.015 ∂H.
horsepower and the cost of larger diameter pipe is This means, for example, that output would remain
$200,000 per inch, does the original design exhibit the constant following a one inch reduction in pipe diameter
property required for optimal input combinations? If so, provided that horsepower were increased by 66.67.
why? If not, why not?
11
• MNREGA, labour shortage and farm
mechanization in Punjab Substitution
https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/punjab/growers-feel-pinch-as-farm-wages-go-
up/608030.html
12