English Literature II Monograph
English Literature II Monograph
English Literature II Monograph
The Wanderer
and the English Romantics
ANGELICA SANTI
DNI 20029315
English Literature II
February 2017
Table of Contents
Page
I.Introduction
Wordsworth ........................................................................................................... 7
Coleridge ............................................................................................................... 10
Byron ..................................................................................................................... 10
III.Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 15
IV.Notes ..................................................................................................................... 16
~2~
I - INTRODUCTION
The name "Romantic period", given to the span between the year 1798 and
1832, refers to a turbulent period, during which England experienced the ordeal of
change from a primarily agricultural society, where wealth and power had been
occurred in a context of revolution—first the American and then the more radical
constant threat to the social structure from imported revolutionary ideologies to which
the ruling classes responded by the repression of traditional liberties. These socio
political events led to a new way of shaping and creating literature that is known as
It is stated in the Norton Anthology of English Literature that this period, though
by far the shortest, is at least as complex and diverse as any other period in British
literary history (Greenblatt 1)1. During the twentieth century, five poets were selected by
scholars to construct the notion of a unified Romanticism on the basis of their works:
William Wordsworth, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, George Gordon Byron, Percy Bysshe
Shelley, and John Keats. Being William Blake lately added to make a sixth, they would
be known as the Pleiades of English Romantic poetry because, “like that famous six-
star constellation in Taurus, [they are] well-observed and known to all” (McCalman
270). 2
But to create the notion of an integrated group would not be an easy task, as
their relationship was troubled and, in some cases, almost inexistent. Wordsworth and
Coleridge would fit no single definition, though they were close collaborators, Byron
strongly and openly rejected both Coleridge's philosophy and Wordsworth's poetry,
Shelley and Keats were stylistically and philosophically at opposite poles and, finally,
first appeared in 1798 the word ‘Romantic’ was no compliment. It meant ‘fanciful’,
among scholars, the concept has remained fluid ever since but never reached
by artists, which tend to be more coherent, at least to begin with. The British Romantic
poets could not have done this. Blake, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Byron, Shelley and
Keats never met in the same room and, had they done so, would probably have fallen
out immediately. One factor was the generation gap. Byron, Shelley and Keats might
have enjoyed the company of Wordsworth as he was in his later twenties and early
thirties, but by the time they reached artistic maturity – c.1816 for Shelley and Byron,
1819 for Keats – he was well into middle age and appeared to have abandoned the
religious and political views of his youth. Byron caught up with the critical debate
surrounding the concept of Romanticism in 1821, but Coleridge beat him to it by a year.
In 1820 the sage of Highgate compiled a list of ‘Romantic’ writers in which the only
English poets of the day were Southey, Scott and Byron. The oddity of this serves to
underline the inbuilt resistance of the concept to satisfactory definition – something that
guarantees its usefulness as a critical and pedagogical tool. Critics continue to adapt it
to their various needs while teachers use it to make connections between sometimes
Many of the Romantics became fascinated with the notion of the “sublime”, a
state that Classical authors as Plato and Longinus defined as physical, moral,
~4~
usually associated with the power it has on the perceiver’s senses and imagination
although the emphasis in this period is given to the mixture of ecstasy and terror that
Wordsworth’s The Prelude recounts the poet’s powerful emotions felt during the
ascent of Mount Snowdon. Shelley’s Mount Blanc reflects on nature’s power and
indifference to human life. Byron depicts, based on his own personal experience, some
wrote about the power of the human imagination and speculated about the sources of
the artist’s inspiration. To symbolize the truths and perils of this quest these poets used
the figure of the wanderer or traveller, who, through a variety of extreme emotional and
mental states reflected about nature, man’s place in society and politics. Also pervaded
vehicle through which the Romantics portrayed the reflections of Man confronting
Nature, frequently using the metaphor for the sublime: the power and mystery of forces
that inspired awe, solace, and self-discovery. They also reflected about the vicissitudes
The renowned psychologist Carl Jung defined several archetypes that represent
evoke deep emotions. The Wanderer, also known as the seeker or explorer, is an
archetypal character that goes on a journey, either physically or mentally, from his
known home to the unknown, to find a greater meaning to life. This Wanderer can also
be a traveller that does not belong to a settled group or tribe, an outcast, or someone
on the run.4
Among these wandering characters, some stand out because they have been
the source of inspiration to many writers, including the English Romantics: (1) The
~5~
Wanderer, an old English Poem5, that presents the despair of a vassal whose lord and
retainers were slain in a marauders' attack, and the whole town and its people wiped
out. The poet has survived, but the horror of that day haunts him. He takes up a little
boat to seek out a new lord and a welcoming village, but everywhere he goes he
encounters the same carnage and destruction. And so the poet is a wanderer on the
face of the land and sea, suffering a grim and irreconcilable solitude; (2) Melmoth the
elements drawn from Dante’s Inferno (1321) and Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote
(1615)6; (3) the wandering Jew, a popular motif of the doomed sinner in Christian
folklore, the legend of the wandering Jew influenced Gothic fiction, particularly the
creation of such characters as Ambrosio, the hero villain in Matthew Gregory Lewis’s
the Monk (1796); the guilt-ridden wanderer in Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s ballad The
Rime Of The Ancient Mariner (1798); and Father Schemoli in Charles Robert Maturin’s
The Fatal Revenge; or, The Family of Montorio (1807), among others.7
the use of this archetypal figure in the works of the English Romantics. It will also aim
to find similarities and differences in them, and the importance of its use in the
depiction of the turmoil and confusion that pervaded their time, mostly remembered as
the Age of Revolutions. I will resort to the works of Maunder, Andrew, Encyclopedia of
Literature.
~6~
THE WANDERER AND THE ENGLISH ROMANTICS
WORDSWORTH
William Wordsworth saw in the French Revolution the promise of freedom for
the human race. He left for France and stayed there for a while, married a French
woman and had a daughter. However, the Revolution brought about chaos and murder
and the promise of freedom faded away, so Wordsworth returned to England in search
of peace and started to remember his past by practicing what he called “emotion
meeting people whom he could ask questions and restore his faith in humanity.
In his works, Wordsworth stresses, with simplicity of language, the purity of the
people and of their countryside, praising nature, which first opened his eyes to beauty.
Being his desire to study human nature in the abstract as well as exposing to the
elements, the pastoral scenes of his own youth were peopled with men and maidens.
Hence, one of his most famous poems “I wandered lonely as I cloud” (1807) remind us
of his ability to reflect upon his own feelings when exposed to nature.
Wordsworth's greatest poetry had been written by 1807, when he published Poems, in
Two Volumes, The Excursion (1814) and the first collected edition of his poems (1815).
His particular style, in which some object or event in the present triggers a sudden
Though through his work he explores the theme of the traveller extensively, for
the sake of brevity, this monograph will refer exclusively to The Excursion (1814), more
~7~
specifically, to Book I, The Wanderer.9 The first of the poem’s nine books incorporates
“The Story of Margaret,” or “The Ruined Cottage,” which was originally written as a
separate fragment, after which the poem advances largely through a series of debates
among its four main speakers: the Poet, the Solitary, the Wanderer and the Pastor. The
Poet, a younger man, is travelling with the Wanderer, a philosophically minded pedlar
who takes him to meet his friend the Solitary in the secluded mountain vale where he
lives. The Solitary is a former soldier and revolutionary preacher whose sadness
overwhelms him, following his wife and children’s deaths and the destruction of his
political hopes in the bloody aftermath of the French Revolution. The Wanderer and, to
a lesser extent, the Poet gently reprove the Solitary for his misanthropy, his withdrawal
from society, and his irreligious views, and the Wanderer suggests that an
imaginatively apprehended faith in God could cure him of his despondency. The three
men then travel to a secluded churchyard among the mountains, where they meet with
the Pastor, who joins in their debate, drawing examples of the harmonizing effects of
virtue and religion from the histories of the dead parishioners who are buried in his
churchyard10.
Excursion has often been condemned by critics who, while acknowledging the great
beauty of some of its passages, have seen it as overly didactic. In recent years,
however, more sympathetic critics have emphasized the poem’s performative aspects,
reading it as a work that foregrounds problems of reading and ideology while refusing
definitively to endorse the philosophical position of any of its characters. Adding to that,
in The Cambridge Introduction to William Wordsworth, Emma Mason states that many
critics read The Excursion not as a story or religious allegory, but as a public
given particular, rather than general meaning. Mason says that “the Wanderer, Solitary,
Pastor and Poet each [are] working to engage the reader in their own memories of
~8~
these events to communalize them as shared memories on which a nation of readers
might draw” (Mason 93). Nature is central to The Excursion, since It provides the
poem’s topography and also transforms it into a spiritualized site that produces a real
change on the travellers. The Wanderer’s argument clearly specifies at the beginning
of the poem that it is “a summer forenoon. The Author reaches a ruined Cottage upon a
Common, and there meets with a revered Friend, the Wanderer, of whose education
and course of life he gives an account--The Wanderer, while resting under the shade of
the Trees that surround the Cottage, relates the History of its last Inhabitant.”
(Wordsworth 1).
The story of “The Ruined Cottage”, thus, becomes a cautionary tale that aims
to warn the reader about the dangers of disengaging with the natural world, when the
Wanderer finds Margaret isolating herself within a sterile depression even as nature
grows up around her cottage. “. . . And they whose hearts are dry as summer dust /
Burn to the socket. Many a passenger / Hath blessed poor Margaret for her gentle
looks, / . . . / But he was welcome; no one went away / But that it seemed she loved
him. She is dead, / The light extinguished of her lonely hut, / The hut itself abandoned
unmarried and childless, “argues for a collective model of domestic affection that
Wordsworth moved, in this more mature period of his life, from an exploration of self-
identity towards a social model of subjectivity that he developed more fully in The
Excursion, providing this archetypal traveller that would help integrate the material
world with a spiritual one, “joining the lives of the companions through communal
~9~
COLERIDGE
that Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s Gothic fantasy ballad, The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,
became a favourite poem of both the intellectual and the ordinary reader by reflecting
the romance of sea tales and, especially relevant for this monograph, the timeless
memories of the wanderer who has plied the waters of the Pacific and the Antarctic and
survived a voyage on a ghost ship. The killing of the bird with a crossbow, an image
suggesting crucifixion, is a symbolic act of pride that breaches nature’s wholeness and
Like the Wandering Jew, the unnamed speaker survives a hellish voyage
wedding guest. Throughout the allegorical drama, the grizzled storyteller, as though
bearing the mark of Cain, makes no effort to return to normal life. (Snodgrass 294) The
poet pictures him as surviving like a soulless spectre amid the corpses of his fellow
sailors. (Snodgrass 294) “God save thee, ancient Mariner! / From the fiends, that
plague thee thus!— / Why look'st thou so?"—With my cross-bow / I shot the Albatross.”
due to his religious background, seems to be more charged with symbolism than
BYRON
Gordon, Lord Byron, as a leading member of the romantic circle, earned a vast cult
acting out the Gothic themes of licentiousness, seduction, cruelty to women and
children, and incest. While channelling his considerable artistry into verse, he also
~ 10 ~
incorporated Gothic touches in his works. Byron’s egocentric behaviour and his
masterful development of the antihero gave rise to the “Byronic hero,” a complex male
egotist covered in mystery and prone to dark brooding.12 This quasi-satanic type
relates to the Greek Prometheus, a suffering god, and the Wandering Jew, suffers
alienation as his occluded spirit searches for some divine truth or link to a deity or
supreme being. A lone wanderer usually endowed with an electric appeal, the Byronic
hero may occur in a variety of representations. Considering in the first place one of
Byron’s most well known works, Don Juan, a new type of wanderer is portrayed. Byron
even mentions Wordsworth’s The Excursion in Don Juan, but gives its protagonist a
sexual turn of the screw. He even uses the verb “wander” in an iniquitous way: “My way
is to begin with the beginning; / The regularity of my design / Forbids all wandering as
the worst of sinning.” (Byron I, 50-52). Through these few lines the speaker announces
his intention of beginning his account of Juan's life and parentage by comparing
“wandering” as “the worst of sinning”. It seems that Byron uses “wandering" in this case
beginning of Canto I of Childe Harold's Pilgrimage: “Oh! let that eye, which, wild as the
Gazelle’s, / Now brightly bold, or beautifully shy, / Wins as it wanders, dazzles where it
dwells,” (Byron I, 28-30) In this case, the verb “wander” seems to be filled with
happiness and joy at the beginning of the pilgrimage. It could be worth for the purpose
which Byron records his impressions of places he visited during several tours of
Europe. This work is imbued by Byron’s love for nature and meditations on the passing
~ 11 ~
MARY SHELLEY
archetype of the Gothic wanderer. At the beginning of the novel, Victor Frankenstein
shows the traits of the wanderer who is seeking knowledge. This quest leads him to
leave his family and embrace isolation. Moreover, the monster he creates can also be
regarded as a wanderer. In an effort to adapt to human behaviour, learn their ways and
laugh at the enthusiasm I express concerning this divine wanderer?” (Shelley Mary 21)
In addition, Mary Shelley would also make use of the features of the Byronic
hero in many of her novels. Ernest J. Lovell explores this feature in Mary Shelley’s
works, stating that the presence of the biographical element in her novels is now well
known and Byron has long been recognized as the model for Raymond in The Last
Man (1826) and for Lodore in Lodore (1835), Castruccio, the hero of Valperga (1823)
Maunder explains that, as part of his personal and poetic program designed to
systems of oppression, Percy Bysshe Shelley shared with the other Romantics the
sense of dissatisfaction with the inequities of power and representation in the world.
radical intellectual revolution, which proceeded from the sharing of ideas, chiefly in the
~ 12 ~
poetry and prose of members of their generation. For Shelley, the notion of revolution
permeated his own writings, many of his poems containing prefaces and notes that
articulate and examine his ideological commitments. The footnotes to his first major
attack on social order, a long poem entitled Queen Mab (1813), pointed to religion,
marriage, and diet as three practices that reinforced the social divisions and
Adding to that, writing in mythic terms allowed him to leap out of his own time to
imagine the perfection of the world in some distant future. Shelley’s best-known epic
work, Prometheus Unbound: A Lyrical Drama in Four Acts (1820), centers the rebellion
of the human race against the gods on the relationship between an erotic couple,
Prometheus and Asia. Further, the poem underscores the power of language to reset
liberation.14
archetypal character in Ozymandias. This sonnet was written in 1817 and published in
1818. In it, a traveller comes across the remains of an enormous statue in the desert,
evidently a tribute to a once great Pharaoh. The inscription on the statue reads: “My
(Shelley ll, 10–11) But as the traveller realizes, these words are in vain for now there is
“Nothing” to be seen and “Round the decay / Of that colossal wreck, boundless and
bare, / The lone and level sands stretch far away” (Shelley ll, 12–14). In an age of
political tyrannies.
This traveller’s tale of a former fallen empire is also reminiscent of the situation
faced by the wedding guest in Coleridge’s The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, who hears
a tale of decline told by the travelling mariner. While Coleridge’s wedding guest
~ 13 ~
becomes a sadder and wiser man upon hearing the mariner’s tale, we receive no such
confirmation from the narrator of Shelley’s sonnet, who simply relates the story to us
without overtly judging the tale, its travelling teller, or its decayed subject.
which heralds winter but also quietly prophesies the coming spring renewal.”15 By being
published in Shelley’s best friend’s paper the Examiner, the poem could undoubtedly
be considered an attack on tyrannical rulers, although the exact critical stance of the
the mocking hand of the sculptor, the storytelling traveller who comes across the ruin,
and the sonnet’s narrator, that outweigh the singular power of a selfish ruler who has
become the subject of a collective story but not its author. Ozymandias’s story is
about the society of their times and the constant sense of turmoil that surrounded them.
~ 14 ~
CONCLUSION
To conclude, it cannot be denied that The English Romantic poets were deeply
impressed by the archetypal figure of the wanderer that pervaded the literature of their
of the Wanderer for more than one reason. Some contain a form derived from the verb
to wander, and others depict the archetypal character of the wanderer or traveller. They
would use this figure for various reasons. While The Wanderer in The Excursion served
Wordsworth's needs to expose his own fears about the constant changes of the
modern world and the need to construct a more civilized society, The Rime of the
Ancient Mariner evokes references to the old English poem "the Wanderer" and tale of
"the Wandering Jew" and is overloaded with religious symbols. Adding to that, Byron
figures of the wanderer allow him to disguise the yearnings of his own licentious life
experiences, which constitute a constant in his works, mixing them with his love for
Furthermore, Mary Shelley, in line with the Byronic hero, makes a display of
literariness by developing one of the most iconic wanderers in the history of literature.
The arguments presented in the monograph suggest that the Wanderer figure
helped the English Romantics portray the feelings of uncertainty and bewilderment that
surrounded them. This archetype leaves the known to discover and explore the
unknown, braving loneliness and isolation to seek out new paths. As it happened to the
~ 15 ~
NOTES
1
Greenblatt, Stephen, and M. H. Abrams. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006. 1.
Print.
2
McCalman, Iain. An Oxford companion to the Romantic Age: British culture, 1776-1832. Oxford: Oxford U Press,
1999. 270. Print.
3
Wu, Duncan. Romanticism: An Anthology, 4th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2012. xxxiii. Print.
4
"Stefan Stenudd." Psychoanalysis of Myth - The Jungian Archetypes. Web. 06 Feb. 2017.
5
http://www.hermitary.com/literature/wanderer.html
THE WANDERER
The solitary looks for the favor of fortune,
For serene waters and a welcoming haven.
But his lot is to plough the wintry seas.
An exile's fate is decreed for him.
Each dawn stirs old sorrows.
The slaughter of lord, kin, village, and keep.
Best to swallow grief, to blot out memories.
Best to seal up the heart's wretchedness.
There is none with whom to speak,
No one alive who will understand.
Best to hide sorrow in one's chest.
The storms of fate suffice to busy me.
Years ago, I buried my master in the ground.
Grieving, I crossed winter seas seeking another:
A generous lord to share hall and treasure,
And I a friendless man seeking order anew.
But frostbite and hunger are my lot now.
My sleep is haunted by dreams of the past:
I kneel acknowledging my master's gift.
Gladly I accept a boon of gold in service.
Then the seabirds' shriek startles me.
I shiver in the dark dawn's frost and hail.
My heart recalls the image of my dream.
The pangs of sorrow and exile reawaken.
The present is overthrown by the past.
Rue rash youth's squandering of fortune.
All things dissipate like sea mist.
There is nothing to cling to but memories.
Is not the wise man's virtue patience?
Oaths and intemperance are follies.
The wise man guards his heart with caution.
The cheerful hall will be desolate in old age.
Everywhere the wind blows through empty ruins.
A few walls are left, covered with frost.
Unburied dead, once proud kin, lie wretched.
They are the sad prey of crows and wolves.
The lands were made desolate in a stroke.
Now the halls and remnants are silent.
Stonework empty, wealth dissipated:
Everywhere the same thing meets the eye.
Horse, rider, ringgiver, chalice,
High seats, hallsounds where are they?
So asks my dark mind, full of grief.
Gone, as if never having been.
Storms blast the rocky cliffs.
Blizzards lash earth and sea.
Winter comes, darkness falls.
The world lies silent and empty.
No men or women to be found.
All in this life is suffering.
~ 16 ~
No good fortune to be expected.
No abode but a house of sorrow.
The wise man cloaks his heart:
Steadfastness and temperance.
He does well to dissemble his feelings.
Let his faith rest in that alone.
6
Snodgrass, Mary Ellen. Encyclopedia of Gothic literature. New York: Facts on File, 2005. 228-229. Print.
Maturin loosely based his plot on Sydney Owenson’s The Missionary (1811), a popular novel
published by William Lane’s MINERVA PRESS. Maturin shaped the protagonist after the
antiheroic title character in Percy Bysshe SHELLEY’s closet drama Prometheus Unbound
(1819).
Melmoth the Wanderer influenced an impressive list of writers: Honoré de Balzac, Charles
BAUDELAIRE, Lord BYRON, Johann von GOETHE, Nathaniel HAWTHORNE, Edgar Allan
POE, and Sir Walter SCOTT. In his last years, Oscar WILDE, after release from imprisonment
for sodomy, went into exile in Paris and wrote under the pseudonym Sebastian Melmoth, an
indication of Wilde’s unending torment.
Maturin violated the GOTHIC CONVENTION of placing horrific fiction in the mystic Orient or in
the Catholic realms of the Mediterranean. In stead, his autobiographical plot opens in Dublin, in
the fall of 1816. The MYSTERY takes shape from a situation common to Gothic novels—a
young
title character obsesses over a compelling manuscript about a relative (in this case, someone
named Stanton). To avoid the medieval claptrap of earlier Gothic models, Maturin connects the
document to an historic era of religious fanaticism, the English Puritans’ execution of King
Charles I on January 30, 1649. From this ominous springboard, a complex series of embedded
side plots—“The Tale of the Indians,” “The Tale of Guzman’s Family,” and “The Tale of the
Lovers”— varies the narrative with motifs of alienation, temptation, fanaticism, cannibalism, and
confinement to an asylum, a suggestion of the INSANITY wrought by obsessive sectarianism.
Maturin employs the anticlerical text as an ALLEGORY on Ireland’s relationship with England
and as a commentary on morality, ILLUSION, imprisonment and CLAUSTROPHOBIA,
psychological torment, SADISM, and legalistic religion. At the heart of the story is the wretched
bitterness of Melmoth, a VILLAIN who owes much to Ann RADCLIFFE’s Montoni and
SCHEDONI. Of melmoth’s twisted personality, Maturin muses that sarcasm derived from
despair: “A mirth which is not gaiety is often the mask which hides the convulsed and distorted
features of agony—and laughter which never yet was the expression of rapture, has often been
the only intelligible language of madness and misery” (Maturin, 270). The pervasive savagery of
the wanderer symbolizes the evils and corruption that haunt humankind, both on the
geographical landscape and the inner terrain of the mind. In the estimation of critic Leonard
Wolf, the wanderer’s plunge into primordial iniquity “becomes an apparently accurate chart of
the cost to mankind of original sin” (Maturin, Introduction, xi).
One of the most gripping of Maturin’s digressive tales is the involvement of a shipwrecked
Spaniard named Monçada, whose story expresses the author’s ANTI-CATHOLICISM. Forced
into celibacy by the Inquisition, he relates his seduction by a Satanic SUPERNATURAL loner,
who entices him from a restrictive monastery. Paralleling diabolic stories and tales of the
WANDERING JEW, the novel reaches its high point with a confrontation between Stanton and
the unnamed demon, who has extended his victim’s life to 150 years. In an ATMOSPHERE of
moral vacuum and theological despair, the victim resigns himself to reclamation by the devil.
On his return to Ireland, Melmoth, the agent of Satan, meets his end. The demon demands a
terrible, unavoidable punishment for overreaching human boundaries, first in the sea, then in
the nether reaches. In a fearful vision, the wanderer sees himself on the lip of a precipice where
an unseen force flings him to perdition. Maturin expands on damnation with powerful imagery:
“The upper air (for there was no heaven) showed only blackness unshadowed and
impenetrable—but, blacker than that blackness, he could distinguish a gigantic outstretched
arm, that held him as in sport on the ridge of that infernal precipice” (Maturin, 409).
The descent ends with a succession of stop-motion images: “He fell—he sunk—he blazed—he
shrieked!” (ibid., 410). As a warning to the reader, Maturin indicates that Melmoth’s death does
not rid the world of persecution. French readers thrilled to Émile Bégin’s translation, L’Homme
du Mystère, ou Histoire de Melmoth le Voyageur (The man of mystery; or, the story of Melmoth
the traveler, 1820) and Jean Cohen’s Melmoth, ou l’Homme Errant (Melmoth; or, the wandering
man, 1820).
7
Snodgrass, Mary Ellen. Encyclopedia of Gothic literature. New York: Facts on File, 2005. 356-357. Print.
The mythic Jewish pariah had his origin as a fictional straw man and repository of anti-Semitic
hatreds.
Identified as Joseph Cartaphilus, a porter to Pontius Pilate or an officer of the Sanhedrin, the
wandering Jew supposedly mocked Jesus on the way to execution on Golgotha. Upon
shouldering the cross, Jesus halted long enough to condemn Cartaphilus to an unending earthly
journey until Judgment Day.
Based on a cryptic verse in Matthew 16:28 and substantiated by a curse on the Roman
Malchus, who struck Jesus in John 18:20–22, the tale is a reverse of the FAUST LEGEND.
~ 17 ~
While Faust bargained with Satan for a longer life, the longlived wandering Jew was an undying
protagonist who wished for death as an end to his unrelieved trekking throughout Europe, the
British Isles, and Russia. The story first appeared in literature in Flores Historiarum (The
Flowers of History), which English monk Roger of Wendover, the chronicler of St. Albans
Abbey, compiled in 1228. Historian Matthew of Paris enlarged on a supposed sighting of the
Jew in Armenia in Chronica Majora Anglorum (Major history of the English, ca. 1258).
The legendary Jew made a peripatetic march through theological writings and pulpit sermons, in
stage plays and ballads, as a subject for art and music, and as grist for chroniclers and folk-
story tellers. In 1547, a new version identified the wanderer as Ahasverus (or Ahasuerus), a
cobbler who refused to let Jesus rest on his way down the streets of Jerusalem to the
crucifixion. Like an earthly demon, the aged scorner was the unwilling immortal, the supreme
literary SYMBOL of alienation, OTHERNESS, and perpetual penitence. He was also a useful
threat to naughty children and to parishioners, whom parsons chastened with reported sightings
of the cursed Jew.
On a grander scale, the wanderer, yearning for redemption, justified hatred and persecution of
all Jews throughout the Middle Ages, particularly during the Spanish Inquisition and the
expulsion of Jews from Spain in the 1490s. The figure permeated much of German, French, and
English romantic and Gothic literature—the title character in Christian Friedrich Schubart’s Der
Ewige Jude: Eine Lyrische Rhapsodie (The wandering Jew: A lyric rhapsody, 1783); a questing
alchemist in William GODWIN’s St. Leon (1799); a mysterious traveler in Charles Robert
Maturin’s MELMOTH THE WANDERER (1820); and the reviled protagonist in George Croly’s
Salathiel, the Wandering Jew (1828), which is set in Jerusalem during the repressive regimes of
Nero and Titus. French novelist Eugène Sue’s Le Juif Errant (The Wandering Jew, 1844)
captures the pathos of the weary nomad: “Oh, that I might only finish my task!—‘GO ON!
GO ON!’—A single hour—only a single hour of repose—‘GO ON!’—Alas! I leave those I love on
the brink of the Abyss!—‘GO ON! GO ON!’” (Haining, 740). Marked like Cain with a black cipher
on his brow, he plods into a gale with his hands lifted in vain to heaven.
Among the romantic poets, Percy Bysshe SHELLEY made full use of pathetic, aimless figures
in The Wandering Jew; or, The Victim of the Eternal Avenger (1810), which pictures Paulo
marked by a cross on his forehead; in the sensational St. Irvyne; or, The Rosicrucian (1811);
and for the unfinished short story “The Assassins” (1814). With “The Spectre Bride” (1822),
William Harrison AINSWORTH produced a horrible vision of an evil wanderer gazing into the pit
of hell where “the worm never dies and the fire is never quenched” (Haining, 327). In
AMERICAN GOTHIC, the motif recurs in Nathaniel HAWTHORNE’s “A Virtuoso’s Collection”
and “A Select Party” in Mosses from an Old Manse (1846) and in the MELANCHOLY figure in
poet Edwin Arlington Robinson’s “The Wandering Jew” (1921). The Czech playwright Karel
CAPEK reprised the wanderer as a long-lived female from 16th-century Crete in the
DETECTIVE STORY “The Makropulos Case” (1922).
8
Greenblatt, Stephen, and M. H. Abrams. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006.
245. Print.
9
Wordsworth, William. The excursion 1814. N.p.: Woodstock , 1991. Print.
10
Maunder, Andrew. Encyclopedia of literary romanticism. New York: Facts On File, 2010. 133. Print.
11
Mason, Emma. The Cambridge introduction to William Wordsworth. Cambridge: Cambridge U Press, 2010. 95. Print.
12
Snodgrass, Mary Ellen. Encyclopedia of Gothic literature. New York: Facts on File, 2005. 44-46. Print.
13
Lovell, Jr. Ernest J. Byron and the Byronic Hero in the works of Mary Shelley. JSTOR. Web. 5 Feb. 2017.
14
Maunder, Andrew. Encyclopedia of literary romanticism. New York: Facts On File, 2010. 404-407. Print.
15
Maunder, Andrew. Encyclopedia of literary romanticism. New York: Facts On File, 2010. 326-327. Print.
~ 18 ~
WORKS CITED
Lovell, Jr. Ernest J. Byron and the Byronic Hero in the works of Mary Shelley.
JSTOR. Web. 5 Feb. 2017.
Wu, Duncan. Romanticism: An Anthology, 4th Edition. N.p.: John Wiley & Sons,
2012. Print.
~ 19 ~