Michael Greco Complaint (Gates) - 1.9.20
Michael Greco Complaint (Gates) - 1.9.20
Michael Greco Complaint (Gates) - 1.9.20
MICHAEL A. GRECO
Defendant
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I, Task Force Officer GREGORY P. SCHMITTER, the complainant in this case, state that the
following is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Between on or about January 2. 2020 through January 7, 2020 in the County of Monroe in the
Westem District ofNew York,the defendant yiolated 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), an offense described as follows:
the defendant knowingly, using a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, attempted to
persuade, induce, entice or coerce an individual who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage
in sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of Title 18,
United States Code, Section 2422(b).
-iml
omplainant's signature
City and State: Rochester. New York Marian W.Pavson. United States Magistrate Judge
Printed name and title
Case 6:20-mj-04002-MWP Document 1 Filed 01/08/20 Page 2 of 7
I, Gregory F. Schmitter, being duly sworn, depose and state the foUowing;
Force Officer with the Department ofHomeland Security, Homeland Security Investigations
(HSI). I have been employed by the NYSP since August 2007 and have been a Task Force
Officer with HSI since December 2019. I am currently assigned to the NYSP Troop E Major
Crimes Unit in Canandaigua, NY and to the HSI Buffalo, New York field office. In my
duties, I investigate crimes involving child exploitation, including violations of Title 18,
A. GRECO, with a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b), related to the
or has been related to me by other law enforcement agents. Since this affidavit is being
submitted for the limited purpose ofsecuring a criminal complaint, I have not included each
and every fact known to me concerning this investigation. I have set forth orily the facts that
I believe are necessary to estabhsh probable cause to beheve that MICHAEL A. GRECO did
particular website that allows users to post classified ads for prostitution. The site is known
Case 6:20-mj-04002-MWP Document 1 Filed 01/08/20 Page 3 of 7
by law enforcement as a platform for both adult prostitution and the sexual exploitation of
Lakes, NY regions titled,"YOUNG FUN". The ad displayed a photograph ofa female who
NYSP for use in undercover online enticement investigations. The ad narrative stated, "Hi
guys. If your lookin for young taboo fun, hmu. Age is just a number. If its not your thing,
to the ad. The person sending the text message, later identified as the defendant, asked, "So
how old are you". I responded to the defendant,"Heres the deal its me and my step daughter.
Deals for her not me. Im not into guys. Shes 13. Its not for everyone so if u don't like it no
problem". The defendant responded that he may be interested and inquired "how much" and
asked, "Could I get some rates". I responded,"100 roses for sex. 75 for orcil". Based on my
training and experience, I know that in prostitution and child exploitation circles, "roses" is
used as a term for dollars. The defendant responded,"Ok I can 100", which was the price to
have sexual intercourse with the 13-year-old child. The defendant then stated, "I just really
wanna make sure everything is legit haha and no cops or anything lol". The defendant asked
where I was located, to which I rephed Hemietta, NY. The defendant stated he was in Gates,
NY.
messaging. When asked what the defendant was looking for, he replied, "100", again
referring to the price for sexual intercourse with the child. I responded by stating, "Just gotta
^ The actual DC phone number was posted In the ad, but is removed from this complaint in order to protect the
integrity offuture investigations.
Case 6:20-mj-04002-MWP Document 1 Filed 01/08/20 Page 4 of 7
check hun but this aint no role play or fantasy talk. Real deal. If ur not cool with it cuz shes
younger teU me now. Cant have u show up and freak out and call the cops on me". To this
the defendant replied,"Yes that's cool". Thereafter, the defendant asked to speak via phone
concerning a meeting with the child. A female Special Agent from HSI called the defendant
in response, posing as the child's mother. During the phone caU, the defendant asked if
everything was "legit" and not a "scam." The defendant requested to meet the child and
discussed the price of the encounter with the Special Agent. The Special Agent advised the
price would be "100" for 30 minutes with the child, and asked the defendant:"You want the
fuU thing, right?", referring to sexual intercourse. The defendant rephed, "Yeah if I could".
The defendant then asked if the woman would be right there with the child when the
encounter took place. The Special Agent advised she would be in the next room,but that the
defendant wotild be with the child alone in another room at her apartment. The defendant
then arranged to meet the 13 year old child on the following day, January 7, 2020 at
undercover capacity, posing as the mother ofthe 13 year old child. On that day,the defendant
confirmed he would meet with me and the child at around 5:00 or 6:00 pm. I stated to the
defendant,"So there are some rules cuz shes 13 hun. No anal and no ruffstuff. And you gotta
were a condom. That good w u?". The defendant replied, "Yeah I gotcha I'm cool with all
of that". I advised the defendant that if he brought the child a present, she would not be as
shy or nervous. The defendant asked what kind of presents the child hked. I told the
defendant the child wanted headphones, pink clothes, unicorns, and Reese's peanut butter
cups. The defendant responded that he could probably get something for her and that he
Case 6:20-mj-04002-MWP Document 1 Filed 01/08/20 Page 5 of 7
would not be mean to the child. The defendant later asked,"Do you also have condoms". I
responded that I did not and told the defendant that he would have to bring them.
8. Later on January 7, the female Special Agent from HSI again called the
defendant who advised he was on his way to Henrietta. The Special Agent provided the
defendant with her address, and asked what the defendant would be doing with the child
besides sex. The defendant stated that he was going to "play" with the 13-year-old girl and
she would "go down on him". The defendant called back several minutes later asking for
directions to the apartment. The Special Agent provided directions and told the defendant to
ring the doorbell for apartment 2. Shortly thereafter, the defendant was buzzed into the
apartment building and knocked on the door of apartment 2, where he was met by law
enforcement. The defendant made a brief attempt to flee but was taken into custody without
further incident. The defendant, then identified as MICHAEL A. GRECO, was found to
have a black Apple iPhone XR cellular telephone in his right pant pocket. In his left pant
pocket the defendant had a $100 bill and two condoms. The defendant was also in possession
ofa plastic bag that contained three packages of Reese's peanut butter candy.
9. Following his arrest, the defendant was transported to the NYSP barracks in
Rochester, NY. The defendant was read Miranda rights, which he indicated that he
understood. He agreed to waive his rights and speak with officers. The defendant admitted
that he observed an ad titled "young fun" on the particular website referenced above. The
defendant further admitted he was texting with a woman about meeting to have sex with her
13-year-old female. The defendant admitted fliat his phone number is 585-317-XXXX and
that the cell phone in his pant pocket at the time of his arrest was the phone he used to
communicate with the female. The defendant stated that on January 7, he left his home in
Case 6:20-mj-04002-MWP Document 1 Filed 01/08/20 Page 6 of 7
Gates, New York and went to a gas station where he purchased condoms and Reese's candy
for the encounter. The defendant then drove to the apartment complex in Henrietta to meet
the woman and the 13-year-old girl, in order to engage in sexual intercourse with the chUd.
10. The defendant was born in 1995 and is 24 years old. New York State Penal
Law Section 130.30(1), states that a person is guilty ofRape in the Second Degree when being
18 years old or more, he or she engages in sexual intercourse with a person who is less than
fifteen(15) years old. Rape in the Second Degree is a Class D Felony offense under the New
enticement of a minor, was posted on the Internet, which is a means and facility ofinterstate
and foreign commerce. In addition, the Apple iPhone XR that the defendant used to
communicate with the undercover officers in order to arrange the meeting with the child, was
manufactured outside of New York State, and therefore traveled in interstate or foreign
commerce.
or foreign commerce, attempted to persuade, induce, entice or coerce an individual who had
not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in sexual activity for which any person can be
charged with a criminal offense, in violation ofTitle 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b).
Case 6:20-mj-04002-MWP Document 1 Filed 01/08/20 Page 7 of 7
GREGO^F.SCHMITTER
Task Force Officer
Homeland Security Investigations