FS 5

FS 5
Field Study
Learning Episode 6 ON SCORING RUBRICS
Name of FS Student: LUISA ANGELA P. CLAVO

Course: Bachelor of Elementary Education Year and Block: 4B
Resource Teacher: ____________________ Signature:__________

Subject Area: _____________ Date: _____________
Cooperating School: ___________________ Grade/Year Level: _______
MY LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Interview a Resource Teacher regarding the use of Scoring Rubrics. Use the
guide questions below.
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
1. Where do you use the scoring rubrics? (student outputs or products and
student activities)
2. What help have scoring rubrics given you? When there were no scoring
rubrics yet, what did you use?
3. What difficulties have you met in the use of scoring rubrics?
4. Do you make use of holistic and analytic rubrics? How do they differ?
5. Which is easier to use - analytic or holistic?
6. Were you involved in the making of the scoring rubrics? How do you make
one? Which is easier to construct - analytic or holistic?
FS 5- Learning Assessment Strategies

RESEARCH
Research on examples of holistic and analytic rubrics.
MY ANALYSIS
1. What benefits have scoring rubrics brought to the teaching - learning
process?
2. How are scoring rubrics related to portfolio assessment?
3. To get the most from scoring rubrics, what should be observed in the making
and use of scoring rubrics?

MY REFLECTIONS
Can rubrics help make students to become self - directed or independent
learners? Do rubrics contribute to assessment AS learning (self - assessment)?
What if there were no rubrics in assessment?
MY LEARNING PORTFOLIO

Go over the K to 12 Curriculum Guide and look for at least one competency
that needs to be assessed by the use of rubrics. Make a scoring rubric - one analytic
and the other holistic. Remember to focus on assessing the intended learning
outcome.
MY LEARNING RUBRIC

Field Study 5, Episode 6 – On Scoring Rubrics
Focused on: Examining different types of rubrics used by my Resource Teacher
and relating them to assessment of student learning
Name of FS Student: LUISA ANGELA P. CLAVO

Course: BEED Year and Block: 4B Date Submitted: ___________________
Learning Exemplary Superior Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Episodes 4 3 2 1
All episodes were done All or nearly all episodes Nearly all episodes Fewer than half of
with outstanding quality; were done with high were done with episodes were done; or
Learning work exceeds quality. acceptable quality. most objectives were
Activities expectations. met but need
improvement.
4 3 2 1
All questions / episodes Analysis questions were Analysis questions Analysis questions
were answered answered completely. were not answered were not answered.
completely; in-depth Clear connection with completely. Vaguely
Analysis of the
answers; thoroughly theories. Grammar and related to the theories. Grammar and spelling
Learning
grounded on theories. spelling are superior. Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory.
Episode
Exemplary grammar and 3 acceptable 1
spelling 2
4
Reflection statements are Reflection statements Reflection statements Reflection statements
profound and clear; are clear, but not clearly are shallow; supported are unclear and
supported by experiences supported by by experiences from shallow and are not
Reflections/
from the learning episodes. experiences from the the learning episodes. supported by
Insights
4 learning episodes. 2 experiences from the
3 learning episodes.
1
Portfolio is complete, clear, Portfolio is complete, Portfolio is incomplete; Portfolio is incomplete;
well-organized and all clear, well-organized; supporting supporting
supporting; most supporting documentations are documentations are not
Learning documentations are documentations are organized but are organized and are
Portfolio located in sections clearly available and logical lacking. lacking.
designated. and clearly marked
locations. 1
4 3 2
Submitted before the Submitted on the Submitted a day after Submitted two days or
Submission of
deadline deadline the deadline. more after the
Learning
2 deadline.
Episode
4 3 1
Comment/s: Over-all Score Rating
TRANSMUTATION OF SCORE TO GRADE/RATING

7-
Score 20 19-18 17 16 15 14 13-12 11 10 9-8
below
Grade 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.5 5.00
71-
99 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 75 72
below

____________________ _______________
Signature of FS Teacher Date
above printed name

FS 5 - Activity 6

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FS 5 - Activity 6

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FS 5 - Activity 6

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Name of FS Student: LUISA ANGELA P. CLAVO

Resource Teacher: __________ Signature:

3. What difficulties have you met in the use of scoring rubrics?

5. Which is easier to use - analytic or holistic?

FS 5- Learning Assessment Strategies

2. How are scoring rubrics related to portfolio assessment?

FS 5- Learning Assessment Strategies

FS 5- Learning Assessment Strategies

FS 5- Learning Assessment Strategies

Name of FS Student: LUISA ANGELA P. CLAVO

Learning Exemplary Superior Satisfactory Needs Improvement

TRANSMUTATION OF SCORE TO GRADE/RATING

FS 5- Learning Assessment Strategies

FS 5- Learning Assessment Strategies

You might also like