Assignment
Assignment
Assignment
Researchers have been fascinated in the field of impulse buying for the past sixty years.
Numerous research on impulse purchasing has been conducted in developed countries
like Canada, Norway, England, America, etc and developing countries like China, Korea,
India, Lithuania, Thailand, Philippines, Poland, Indonesia, Pakistan, etc. In those
researches, researchers have mostly focused on identifying the general factors that
increase impulse buying.
With the increasing number of shopping centres and supermarkets, increase in disposable
income, rising independence of youth consumers, combined family structure shrinking
to small size, exposure of a consumer to hundreds of advertising messages in a day,
access to online retailers, access to Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) and Point of
Sales (POS) terminals favouring debit/credit card conveniences, impulsive buying is
rising among Sri Lanka consumers too. Furthermore, marketers and supermarket owners
capitalize on this phenomenon by stimulating customers to purchase based on a range of
attractive store-related attributes (display, store layout, ambiance, and position of
merchandise) and decent service excellence.
However, in case of Sri Lanka, though impulse purchase is a common affair, there is not
sufficient research on this phenomenon. Some parts may have been touched upon but a
solid research is yet to be done.
1.2. Rationale for the Study
The findings resulting from this research are of academic advantage and contribute to the
existing knowledge of the researched area, thus benefiting other student and non-student
researchers. It is also helpful particularly to marketers/owners of supermarkets and retail
stores to better understand their consumers and occasion where the consumers display
irrational purchases in Sri Lanka. Accordingly, they can take advantage of this and
present stimuli in supermarket settings that trigger such behaviour among consumers of
Sri Lanka. In addition, this research helps consumers gain an insight into the true reasons
behind their impulsive buying behaviour in a supermarket setting. Many a times,
consumers themselves are unclear about why they purchase more than what they had
initially thought before entering a supermarket/retail stores.
The main research objectives to identify the impulsive buying behaviour among FMCG
consumers of highly residential areas in Sri Lanka with special emphasise to Keells Super
customers of Thimbirigasyaya.
2. Literature Review
Researchers have also found that Indian consumers have diametrically changed in terms
of their shopping behaviour and impulse buying is emerging as a highly noticeable
behaviour due to entry of foreign products in Indian market, growth in organized retail
industry, increasing disposable income, favourable demographic segmentation and
changing culture & lifestyle (Muruganantham and Bhakat, 2013). Researches of impulse
purchasing in sub-continent countries have observed that some variables like time
availability (Beatty & Ferrell, 1998), gender, mood, materialism, age, culture, availability
of money, product category (Mai et al., 2003) and product price (Wong and Zhou, 2004)
are common among such buyers in supermarket settings.
Azim (2013), customers having high deal proneness attitude and exploratory, at the
presence of good dynamic store environment makes more impulse purchases. And to
increase the impulse buying behaviour of people, retailers have to give a good
atmosphere to their customers inside the store, and must know about different
customers’ tendency towards the sales promotions in order to attract the right
customers.
Bashir and et al. (2013), the impact of Cultural Values and Lifestyle on Impulse
Buying Behaviour in case of Pakistan is positive. There is a significant relationship
among all the variables of cultural values and life styles. The results also suggest that
impulse buying behaviour is predicted by security, life satisfaction, gender role,
financial satisfaction, in group contact and lifestyle variables of cultural values and
lifestyles of Pakistani consumers. Ekeng and et al. (2012), demographic characteristics
have a significant influence on impulse buying. Impulse buying differs significantly
between male and female shoppers where the phenomenon is more common among
female shoppers due to their likeness and spontaneous attraction to fancy products.
Similarly age of shoppers and impulse buying behaviour are inversely related because
adolescents have no responsibility of raising families and they do not bother about the
way they spend money even if it is unplanned as compared to older people. In addition,
an increase in income of consumers makes them prodigal in spending and may
influence to buy products unplanned. More educated consumers are likely to shop
impulsively as they are influenced by their position and placement in society.
Saraswat and et al. (2012), middle income group in Noida city, India are more likely
to do impulsive buying because of economic reasons as promotional offers help in
getting monetary benefits. Different dynamics of advertisement like advertisement of
product in print and visual media, advertisement by celebrities, advertisement using
3-D effect, hoarding and pamphlets of product and event organized by the
organization positively affect majority of respondents into impulse buying. This
reflects a pivotal relationship between respondents’ impulse buying behaviours and
impact of advertising campaign used in practice to enhance impulse purchase
decisions. Chen (2008), product type plays a major role in impulse buying among
young generation in Taiwan. Impulsive buying tendency and involvement with
clothing products are positively associated with traditional store shopping, but not
online. For computer peripherals, higher impulsive buying tendency and higher
product participation are positively related with higher impulse buying online, but not
in-store shopping. In addition, impulsive buying tendency and product involvement
are good predictors of impulse purchase for clothing but not sufficient for computer
peripherals in traditional store shopping. Another major finding outlines the emerging
role of the Internet as a competing marketing channel. Products like clothing cannot
be tried on and can be presented only in pictures and words online, greatly inhibiting
the likelihood of impulse buying compared to in-store shopping. However, the same
does not apply for computer peripherals.
According to Banks & Moorthy (1999), sales promotion led to sudden increase
of sales experienced by retailers due to price-consciousness of consumers. Sinha
& Smith (2000), opinioned that consumer would be easily swayed to buy products as
there is no extra cost by consumers. Blackwell et al (2001) identified that price
discounts play a significant role in influencing consumer product trial behaviour
which indirectly attracts new consumer. According to Shilpa Aggrawal & Amit
Aggrawal (2012), pricing of product has an impact in deriving consumer perception
and the extent to which perception is influenced, is derived from the nature of
consumer behaviour. Based on the relationship the following research question has
been developed.
Beatty and Ferrell (1998) mention that, consumer perception about the money what
they have in their hand to spend, makes considerable impact on buying behaviour.
Badgaiyan, & Verma (2015) highlight that, the availability of money has identified as
one of the important facilitating factor for impulsive buying. Beatty and Ferrell (1998)
further authors explain that, perception of greater availability of money tends to
increase feeling in shopping trip and it makes a strong urge to buy impulsively. As a
consequence of feeling of availability of greater financial possessions, decline the
negative feeling which can be produced from the frustration with the inability to access
the affordable items encountered in the shop (Dinesha, 2014). Huang and Hsieh
(2011), also have explained similar idea, shopper tend to elicit positive emotions and
Based on the relationship the following research question has been developed.
During psychological price promotion, the pull to consumer primarily reflects in price,
and consequently it is necessary to find out the fundamental cause of what frameworks
the different price promotion presentations will bring better results. Nevertheless, how
different applications of the same price promotion affect consumers’ perceptions of
the promotion and their impulsive purchase decisions has been insufficiently studied.
In the assessment of a stimulated price, framing may affect consumers’ estimates of
the promotion value (e.g., Krishna et al., 2002) and thus, current choice [2]. Devon
Del Vecchio et al. (2007) [3] found that promotion frame (percentage-off versus cents-
off) moderates the effect of promotion depth on post-promotion price expectations and
choice. Shih-fen S Chen et al. (1998) [4] has framed a price reduction in percentage
versus dollar terms on either a high-pricing or a low-pricing product. For the high-
pricing product, a price reduction framed in dollar terms seemed more sig-nificant
than the same price reduction framed in percentage terms. Furthermore, whether
consumers process price information in an absolute or relative sense affects their
perceptions of a price discount (Grewal and Mar-morstein, 1994; Heath, Chatterjee,
and France, 1995) [5] [6]. Some researchers from the view of information processing
to explore the process of consumer perception of price discounts and try to explain the
mechanism for consumer to underestimate the price discount. Inaccurate calculation
of the price promotions often leads to underestimation of the price discount (Kim and
Kramer, 2006) [7]. Meanwhile, a study by Kim and Kramer (2006) [8] found that price
discount based on percentage played a positive impact on consumer novelty perceived
savings and purchase intention, that is, the more innovative in the form of price
discounts, the more savings and purchase intention consumer would feel. Yet there is
still lack of research from the prospect of consumers’ regret feeling to explore the
influence of different price promotion (based on the amount of money vs. based on
percentage-off) on consumers’ perception of price discount and impulse buying.
2.2. Research Questions
3. Research Methodology
The theoretical framework was adapted from the research conducted by Vishnu and
Raheem (2013) which was carried out to identify the factors of impulsive buying
behaviour for FMCGs in Larkana, Pakistan. This framework will be modified to Sri
Lanka Context.
3.2. Hypotheses
This research philosophy is positivism and approach will be deductive. As Johnson and
Clark (2006) note, as business and management researchers we need to be aware of the
philosophical commitments we make through our choice of research strategy since this
has significant impact not only on what we do but we understand what it is we are
investigating. Therefore, the research is positivism as the researcher will be trying to find
the answer by the philosophical stance of the natural science by Survey Strategy using
questionnaires which will be Mono method quantitative methodological choice.
This research will be a descriptive research, because the researcher will be collecting data
of consumers to understand their profile. According to Robson (2002), the object of
descriptive research is ‘to portray an accurate profile of persons, events or situations’
(Robson 2002:59).
The research will be cross-sectional, because we recognise that most research projects
undertaken for academic courses are necessarily time constrained.
According to Kumara, S. (2019), there are 1212 people visit Keells outlet,
Thimbirigasyaya. This includes the buyer, buyers family, freinds and others who
accompany the buyer. According Kumara, S. (2019), only 837 transation happends
averagly per day. Which will be 311,364 annual transations happens at the Keells Super,
Thimbirigasyaya, which is 25,947 transsation per month. It is further narrowed to show
that per day atleast 837 transation happens daily. According to the above data the
researcher’s total sample will be 311,364 to do the research, but according to Krejcie, R,
and Morgan, D. (1970), based on the calculator, the sample applicable for this study will
be 384, assuming a sample error of 0.5.
(Source - Krejcie & Morgan, 1970)
3.5. Sample Technique & Data Collection
In this study, stratified random sampling method will be used among the visitors of the
Keells outlet, Thimbirigasyaya. A structured questionnaire with the topic “Factors
affecting impulsive buying behaviour among consumers at Keells Super Market,
Thimbirigasyaya will be prepared and distributed among desired sample.
To strengthen study, primary data will be collected from five respondanats per day uptill
seventy seven days which will equal the total sample of 384. This is to make sure that
consumers data is not collected in a particular time horison but thorught out two months
who will have various behavioulra change, mentally and physically which will affect
thier impulsive buying behaviour. Those five respondants will selected during morning
hours and evening hours, where two will be morning and three will be in the evening
respectively. The researcher will visit to fill out the questionnaire ensuring that those
respondents belonged to various backgrounds with different demographic variables.
Data collected will be summarized in the data sheet and average for each variable will be
formulated through SPSS software and hypothesis will be tested using correlation
analysis. To test the hypothesis chi-square test or ANOVA test will be used. Secondary
data will be analysed using bar charts, pie charts, line charts etc.
Construction of the questionnaire in a simple and easy to understand, using Likert Scale.
To check the consistency of the questionnaires across time and items, questionnaire will
be given to 4 people 2 times with an interval of 4 days to see the reliability of the
questionnaire and further if needed, questionnaire will be edited accordingly. Validity of
the questionnaire also will be checked to see the extent to which the scores actually
represent the variable they the researcher are intend to.
3.7. Delimitation
Often customers are unaware of their impulsive buying behaviour and may
unintentionally manipulate their answers when filling the survey questionnaire.
Sometimes, consumers might justify their purchases as being planned and rational rather
than being impulsive. Due to the limited time and budget, the study will be conducted in
within Colombo only with a limited number of respondents at the Keells Super,
Thimbirigasyaya. Number of variables taken into consideration for evaluation will be
limited. Entire branch should have been analysed for the best results. Finance and Data
accessibility are difficult.
Azim, A. (2013). Effect of dynamic environment, customers’ tendency towards promotion and
new experiences on impulse buying. Management and Administrative Sciences Review, Vol.
2(3), 281-292.
Bashir, S., Zeeshan, M., & Sabbar, S. (2013). Impact of cultural values and lifestyle on impulse
buying behaviour: A case study of Pakistan. International Review of Management and Business
Research, Vol. 2(1), 193-200.
Beatty, S. E., & Ferrell, M. E. (1998). Impulsive buying: Modelling its precursors. Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 74(2), 169-191.
CENTRAL BANK OF SRI LANKA (2019). ANNUAL REPORT. [online] Colombo, pp.48,
49, 50. Available at: https://www.cbsl.gov.lk/en/publications/economic-and-financial-
reports/annual-reports/annual-report-2018 [Accessed 7 Nov. 2019].
Chen, S.-F.S., Monroe, K.B. and Lou, Y.-C. (1998) The Effects of Framing Price Promotion
Messages on Consumers’ Perceptions and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74, 353-
372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80100-6
Cho, J., Ching, G. S., & Luong, T.H. (2014). Impulse buying behaviour of Vietnamese
consumers in supermarket setting. International Journal of Research Studies in Management,
Vol. 3(2), 33-50.
DelVecchio, D., Krishnan, H.S. and Smith, D.C. (2007) Cents or Percent? The Effects of
Promotion Framing on Price Expectations and Choice. Journal of Marketing, 71, 158-170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.158
Ekeng, A. B., Lifu, F. L., & Asinya, F. A. (2012). Effect of demographic characteristics on
consumer impulse buying among consumers of Calabar municipality, Cross river state.
Academic Research International, Vol. 3(2), 568-574.
Grewal, D. and Marmorstein, H. (1994) Market Price Variation, Perceived Price Variation and
Consumers’ Price Search Decisions for Durable Goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 21,
452-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209410
Heath, T.B., Chatterjee, S. and France, K.R. (1995) Mental Accounting and Change in Price:
The Frame Dependence of Preference Dependence. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 90-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209437
Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2012/13. (2019). 13th ed. [ebook] Colombo:
Ministry of Policy Planning Economic Affairs, Child Youth and Cultural Affairs, p.2.
Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.lk/HIES/HIES2012_13FinalReport.pdf [Accessed 3
Nov. 2019].
Kim, H.M. and Kramer, T. (2006) The Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition Effort on
Responses to Multi-Di- mensional Prices. Marketing Letters, 17, 193-203.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-5928-2
Kim, H.M. and Kramer, T. (2006) “Pay 80%” versus “Get 20% off”: The Effect of Novel
Discount Presentation on Consumers’ Deal Perceptions. Marketing Letters, 17, 311-321.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-9309-7
Krishna, R.B., Lehman, D.R. and Yuan, H. (2002) A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Price
Presentation on Perceived Savings. Journal of Retailing, 78, 101-118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(02)00072-6
Rosnow, R. (2005). Beginning behavioural research. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Saraswat, R., Prakash, G., & Yadav, S. K. (2012). Impact of advertising scheme on impulse
buying behaviour of consumer in: An empirical study of Noida city. Asia-Pacific Marketing
Review, Vol. 1(1), 72-77.
Vishnu, P., & Raheem, A. R. (2013). Factors influencing impulse buying behaviour. European
Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 100(3), 67-79.
Vyas, H. (2015). Packaging design elements and users perception: A context in fashion
branding and communication. Journal of Applied Packaging Research, Vol. 7(2), 95-107.
IMPULSIVE BUYING BEHAVIOUR AMONG FMCG CONSUMERS
As a part of Research Project for my MBA degree, I am conducting a research on the above
topic. The information provided will be confidential and solely be used for academic purpose.
Therefore, I kindly request you to allot few minutes to complete the following questionnaire as
required. Your precious time and effort is highly valued and appreciated.
Q4. You go to a supermarket to buy certain items but you end up buying more than what you
intended to. Has this ever happened to you? Impulsive Buying
1. Yes 2. No
Q5. I have made the following impulsive decisions in the past. How strongly do you agree or
disagree with each of the following situations.