The document compares the site, design, organization of spaces, and standards between the Dayananda Sagar School of Architecture and R.V. College of Architecture. The R.V. College is designed specifically for an architecture program based on the context of its sloped site, with separated and well-lit studio and classroom spaces organized around landscaped courtyards. In contrast, the Dayananda Sagar school is housed in a building not designed for architecture on a leveled but formerly sloped site, with dimly lit learning spaces branching directly off the main corridor.
The document compares the site, design, organization of spaces, and standards between the Dayananda Sagar School of Architecture and R.V. College of Architecture. The R.V. College is designed specifically for an architecture program based on the context of its sloped site, with separated and well-lit studio and classroom spaces organized around landscaped courtyards. In contrast, the Dayananda Sagar school is housed in a building not designed for architecture on a leveled but formerly sloped site, with dimly lit learning spaces branching directly off the main corridor.
The document compares the site, design, organization of spaces, and standards between the Dayananda Sagar School of Architecture and R.V. College of Architecture. The R.V. College is designed specifically for an architecture program based on the context of its sloped site, with separated and well-lit studio and classroom spaces organized around landscaped courtyards. In contrast, the Dayananda Sagar school is housed in a building not designed for architecture on a leveled but formerly sloped site, with dimly lit learning spaces branching directly off the main corridor.
The document compares the site, design, organization of spaces, and standards between the Dayananda Sagar School of Architecture and R.V. College of Architecture. The R.V. College is designed specifically for an architecture program based on the context of its sloped site, with separated and well-lit studio and classroom spaces organized around landscaped courtyards. In contrast, the Dayananda Sagar school is housed in a building not designed for architecture on a leveled but formerly sloped site, with dimly lit learning spaces branching directly off the main corridor.
Comparative study • Site • Design on the basis of site context • Organization of spaces • Visual effects • Comparison with standards • Comments Site Dayananda sagar school of architecture R.V. college of architecture • Sloped site- situated on a • Sloped site- site inclined in hillock two directions • Site cut and filled to a • Designed with context to leveled surface the site’s slope Design on the basis of site context Dayananda sagar school of architecture R.V. college of architecture • No separate block for architecture • A dedicated block for architecture in a campus of an engineering college • Housed in a floor of a block meant to serve an engineering department • To screen activities of school from engineering- blank walls • Building here hasn’t been designed with • Slope incorporated in design context to the site which is actually a sloped • Built to human scale site Organization of spaces Dayananda sagar school of architecture R.V. college of architecture • Learning spaces branch out from • Studio spaces separated from the corridor lecture rooms to promote physical • Learning spaces activity o Studio cum lecture halls, 5 nos., • Learning spaces meant for 40 students o 9 studios with a capacity of 40 o 1 seminar hall that doubles as a crit students room o 6 lecture halls with A/V facilities o A 40 unit computer lab o 1 seminar hall with 120 seating capacity • Interactive spaces o 60 unit computer lab o Nothing specific- the built • Interactive spaces environment does not promote interaction o Landscaped courtyards o 200 seater- Open air theatre • Two faculty rooms – equipped with PCs • Faculty rooms – individual and common rooms Lighting & ventilation Dayananda sagar school of architecture R.V. college of architecture • Doubly loaded corridor dimly • doubly loaded corridor-well lit and ventilated lit and poorly ventilated by • Studios- well lit and ventilated by natural means inducing the natural means - vertical windows at necessity for artificial lighting two levels, studio ht-15’ • Well lit studios/classrooms of • Classrooms- artificial lighting required on gloomy days, room ht- height 12’ with strip windows 11’ Comparison with standards Standards R.V. college of architecture • Studios- space required/ A0 drawing • Fixed tables A0 size table-3.5sq.m • Area of studio- 155 sq.m approx.- • Adjustable drawing table preferred 3.8sq.m per head-more than sufficient • Classrooms- 1.2 sq.m per head • Spacing between tables-edge to edge 4’ • Classrooms-1.56 sq.m per head Design concept • Located in an engineering campus- privacy desired-Blank outer walls • Friendly and welcoming to students- o human scale o Several small courtyards instead of a single large one • Main corridor-spine of the college • Site inclined in two directions- levels of site used in design • Classrooms and studios spaced out to increase student’s physical activity and relax their minds • Built form encourages interaction between students Corridors • Main hub of the college • Serves as an interaction space • Display and notification space • Branches out the learning spaces • Runs at three different levels across the entire school • Height of the corridor ranges from 10’-15’ since it varies from place to place due to levels in the site - 6’ wide • Well lit and ventilated by courtyards Dayananda Sagar School of Architecture • Location: Kumarasamy layout, south Bangalore • Area: 28 acres(DSI) • School of architecture: housed in a floor of a building meant to cater to the needs of engineering • A linear corridor with learning spaces and faculty rooms on either sides
The Relationship Between Women Principal Instructional Leadership Practices, Teacher Organisational Commitment and Teacher Professional Community Practice in Secondary Schools in KL PDF