Menu

You are here: Home » Bridge Design » Examples » BS Abutment Design Example

Abutment Design Example to BD 30

Design the fixed and free end cantilever abutments to the 20m span deck shown to carry HA and 45 units of HB loading. Analyse
the abutments using a unit strip method. The bridge site is located south east of Oxford (to establish the range of shade air
temperatures).
Vehicle collision on the abutments need not be considered as they are assumed to have sufficient mass to withstand the collision
loads for global purposes (See BD 60/04 Clause 2.2).

The ground investigation report shows suitable founding strata about 9.5m below the proposed road level. Test results show the
founding strata to be a cohesionless soil having an angle of shearing resistance (φ) = 30 o and a safe bearing capacity of 400kN/m2.

Backfill material will be Class 6N with an effective angle of internal friction (ϕ') = 35o and density (γ) = 19kN/m3.

The proposed deck consists of 11No. Y4 prestressed concrete beams and concrete deck slab as shown.

Loading From the Deck

A grillage analysis gave the following reactions for the various load cases:

Critical Reaction Under One Beam

Nominal Reaction Ultimate Reaction

(kN) (kN)

Concrete Deck 180 230

Surfacing 30 60

HA udl+kel 160 265

 45 units HB 350 500

Total Reaction on Each Abutment

Nominal Reaction Ultimate Reaction

(kN) (kN)

Concrete Deck 1900 2400

Surfacing 320 600

HA udl+kel 1140 1880

45 units HB 1940 2770

Nominal loading on 1m length of abutment:

Deck Dead Load = (1900 + 320) / 11.6 = 191kN/m
HA live Load on Deck = 1140 / 11.6 = 98kN/m
HB live Load on Deck = 1940 / 11.6 = 167kN/m

From BS 5400 Part 2 Figures 7 and 8 the minimum and maximum shade air temperatures are -19 and +37oC respectively.
For a Group 4 type structure (see fig. 9) the corresponding minimum and maximum effective bridge temperatures are -11 and +36oC
from tables 10 and 11.
Hence the temperature range = 11 + 36 = 47oC.
From Clause 5.4.6 the range of movement at the free end of the 20m span deck = 47 × 12 × 10 -6 × 20 × 10 3 = 11.3mm.
The ultimate thermal movement in the deck will be ± [(11.3 / 2) γf3 γfL] = ±[11.3 × 1.1 × 1.3 /2] = ± 8mm.

Option 1 - Elastomeric Bearing:

With a maximum ultimate reaction = 230 + 60 + 500 = 790kN then a suitable elastomeric bearing would be Ekspan's Elastomeric
Pad :

Bearing EKR35 :

Maximum Load = 1053kN

Shear Deflection = 13.3mm
Shear Stiffness = 12.14kN/mm
Bearing Thickness = 19mm

Note: the required shear deflection (8mm) should be limited to between 30% to 50% of the thickness of the bearing. The figure
quoted in the catalogue for the maximum shear deflection is 70% of the thickness.
A tolerance is also required for setting the bearing if the ambient temperature is not at the mid range temperature. The design shade
air temperature range will be -19 to +37oC which would require the bearings to be installed at a shade air temperature of [(37+19)/2
-19] = 9oC to achieve the ± 8mm movement.
If the bearings are set at a maximum shade air temperature of 16oC then, by proportion the deck will expand 8×(37-16)/[(37+19)/2]
= 6mm and contract 8×(16+19)/[(37+19)/2] = 10mm.
Let us assume that this maximum shade air temperature of 16oC for fixing the bearings is specified in the Contract and design the
abutments accordingly.

Horizontal load at bearing for 10mm contraction = 12.14 × 10 = 121kN.

This is an ultimate load hence the nominal horizontal load = 121 / 1.1 / 1.3 = 85kN at each bearing.
Total horizontal load on each abutment = 11 × 85 = 935 kN ≡ 935 / 11.6 = 81kN/m.

Alternatively using BS 5400 Part 9.1 Clause 5.14.2.6:

H = AGδr/tq
Using the Ekspan bearing EKR35

Maximum Load = 1053kN

Area = 610 × 420 = 256200mm2
Nominl hardness = 60 IRHD
Bearing Thickness = 19mm

Shear modulus G from Table 8 = 0.9N/mm2

H = 256200 × 0.9 × 10-3 × 10 / 19 = 121kN
This correllates with the value obtained above using the shear stiffness from the manufacturer's data sheet.

Option 2 - Sliding Bearing:

With a maximum ultimate reaction of 790kN and longitudinal movement of ± 8mm then a suitable bearing from the Ekspan EA
Series would be /80/210/25/25:

Maximum Load = 800kN

Base Plate A dimension = 210mm
Base Plate B dimension = 365mm
Movement ± X = 12.5mm

BS 5400 Part 2 - Clause 5.4.7.3:

Average nominal dead load reaction = (1900 + 320) / 11 = 2220 / 11 = 200kN
Contact pressure under base plate = 200000 / (210 × 365) = 3N/mm 2
As the mating surface between the stainless steel and PTFE is smaller than the base plate then the pressure between the sliding
faces will be in the order of 5N/mm 2.
From Table3 of BS 5400 Part 9.1 the Coefficient of friction = 0.08 for a bearing stress of 5N/mm2
Hence total horizontal load on each abutment when the deck expands or contracts = 2220 × 0.08 = 180kN ≡ 180 / 11.6 = 16kN/m.

Traction and Braking Load - BS 5400 Part 2 Clause 6.10:

Nominal Load for HA = 8kN/m × 20m + 250kN = 410kN
Nominal Load for HB = 25% of 45units × 10kN × 4axles = 450kN
450 > 410kN hence HB braking is critical.
Braking load on 1m width of abutment = 450 / 11.6 = 39kN/m.
When this load is applied on the deck it will act on the fixed abutment only.

Skidding Load - BS 5400 Part 2 Clause 6.11:

Nominal Load = 300kN
300 < 450kN hence braking load is critical in the longitudinal direction.
When this load is applied on the deck it will act at bearing shelf level. If sliding bearings are used then friction forces at the free end
should be considered as a relieving effect on longitudinal and skidding loads and therefore ignored when designing the fixed
bearing.

Loading at Rear of Abutment

Backfill
For Stability calculations use active earth pressures = Ka γ h
Ka for Class 6N material = (1-Sin35) / (1+Sin35) = 0.27
Density of Class 6N material = 19kN/m3
Active Pressure at depth h = 0.27 × 19 × h = 5.13h kN/m 2
Hence Fb = 5.13h2/2 = 2.57h2kN/m

Surcharge - BS 5400 Part 2 Clause 5.8.2:

For HA loading surcharge = 10 kN/m 2
For HB loading surcharge = 20 kN/m 2
Assume a surchage loading for the compaction plant to be equivalent to 30 units of HB
Hence Compaction Plant surcharge = 12 kN/m 2.
For surcharge of w kN/m2 :
Fs = Ka w h = 0.27wh kN/m

1) Stability Check

Initial Sizing for Base Dimensions

There are a number of publications that will give guidance on base sizes for free standing cantilever walls, Reynolds's Reinforced
Concrete Designer's Handbook being one such book.
Alternatively a simple spreadsheet will achieve a result by trial and error.

Load Combinations

Backfill + Construction surcharge

Wall backfilled up to bearing shelf level only.

Backfill + HA surcharge + Deck dead load + Deck contraction

Backfill + HA surcharge + Braking behind abutment + Deck dead load

Backfill + HB surcharge + Deck dead load

 Backfill + HA surcharge + Deck dead load + HB on deck

Backfill + HA surcharge + Deck dead load + HA on deck + Braking on deck

(Not applied to free abutment if sliding bearings are provided)

CASE 1 - Fixed Abutment

Density of reinforced concrete = 25kN/m3.

Weight of wall stem = 1.0 × 6.5 × 25 = 163kN/m
Weight of base = 6.4 × 1.0 × 25 = 160kN/m
Weight of backfill = 4.3 × 6.5 × 19 = 531kN/m
Weight of surcharge = 4.3 × 12 = 52kN/m
Backfill Force Fb = 0.27 × 19 × 7.52 / 2 = 144kN/m
Surcharge Force Fs = 0.27 × 12 × 7.5 = 24 kN/m

Restoring Effects:

Weight Lever Arm Moment About A

Stem 163 1.6 261

Base 160 3.2 512

Backfill 531 4.25 2257

Surcharge 52 4.25 221

∑= 906 ∑= 3251

Overturning Effects:

Lever Arm Moment About A

F
 Backfill 144 2.5 361

Surcharge 24 3.75 91

∑= 168 ∑= 452

BD 30 Clause 5.2.4.2 refers to CP 2: 1951 Earth retaining structures for Safety Factors.
Factor of Safety Against Overturning = 3251 / 452 = 7.2 > 2.0 ∴ OK.
For sliding effects:
Active Force = Fb + Fs = 168kN/m
Frictional force on underside of base resisting movement = W tan(φ) = 906 × tan(30o) = 523kN/m
Factor of Safety Against Sliding = 523 / 168 = 3.1 > 2.0 ∴ OK.

Bearing Pressure:
Check bearing pressure at toe and heel of base slab = (P / A) ± (P × e / Z) where P × e is the moment about the centre of the base.
P = 906kN/m
A = 6.4m2/m
Z = 6.42 / 6 = 6.827m3/m
Nett moment = 3251 - 452 = 2799kNm/m
Eccentricity (e) of P about centre-line of base = 3.2 - (2799 / 906) = 0.111m
Pressure under base = (906 / 6.4) ± (906 × 0.111 / 6.827)
Pressure under toe = 142 + 15 = 157kN/m2 < 400kN/m2 ∴ OK.
Pressure under heel = 142 - 15 = 127kN/m2

Hence the abutment will be stable for Case 1.

Analysing the fixed abutment with Load Cases 1 to 6 and the free abutment with Load Cases 1 to 5 using a simple spreadsheet the
following results were obtained:

Fixed Abutment:

F of S F of S
Overturning Sliding

Case 1 7.16 3.09

Case 2 2.87 2.13

Case 2a 4.31 2.64

Case 3 3.43 2.43

Case 4 4.48 2.63

Case 5 5.22 3.17

Case 6 3.80 2.62

Bearing Bearing
Pressure at Toe Pressure at Heel
 Case 1 156 127

Case 2 386 5

Case 2a 315 76

Case 3 351 39

Case 4 322 83

Case 5 362 81

Case 6 378 43

Free Abutment:

F of S F of S
Overturning Sliding

Case 1 7.15 3.09

Case 2 2.91 2.14

Case 2a 4.33 2.64

Case 3 3.46 2.44

Case 4 4.50 2.64

Case 5 5.22 3.16

Bearing Bearing
Pressure at Toe Pressure at Heel

Case 1 168 120

Case 2 388 7

Case 2a 318 78

Case 3 354 42

Case 4 325 84

Case 5 365 82

It can be seen that the use of elastomeric bearings (Case 2) will govern the critical design load cases on the abutments. We shall
assume that there are no specific requirements for using elastomeric bearings and design the abutments for the lesser load effects
by using sliding bearings.

2) Wall and Base Design

Loads on the back of the wall are calculated using 'at rest' earth pressures. Serviceability and Ultimate load effects need to be
calculated for the load cases 1 to 6 shown above. Again, these are best carried out using a simple spreadsheet.
Using the Fixed Abutment Load Case 1 again as an example of the calculations:
Wall Design
Ko = 1 - Sin(ϕ') = 1 - Sin(35o) = 0.426
γ fL for horizontal loads due to surcharge and backfill from BS 5400 Part 2 Clause 5.8.1.2:
Serviceability = 1.0
Ultimate = 1.5
γ f3 = 1.0 for serviceability and 1.1 for ultimate (from BS 5400 Part 4 Clauses 4.2.2 and 4.2.3)

Backfill Force Fb on the rear of the wall = 0.426 × 19 × 6.52 / 2 = 171kN/m

Surcharge Force Fs on the rear of the wall = 0.426 × 12 × 6.5 = 33kN/m
At the base of the Wall (tension in the rear face):
Serviceability moment = (171 × 6.5 / 3) + (33 × 6.5 / 2) = 371 + 107 = 478kNm/m
Ultimate moment = 1.1 × 1.5 × 478 = 789kNm/m
Ultimate shear = 1.1 × 1.5 × (171 + 33) = 337kN/m

Analysing the fixed abutment with Load Cases 1 to 6 and the free abutment with Load Cases 1 to 5 using a simple spreadsheet the
following results were obtained for the design moments and shear at the base of the wall:

Fixed Abutment:

Moment Moment Moment Shear

SLS Dead SLS Live ULS ULS

Case 1 371 108 790 337

Case 2a 829 258 1771 566

Case 3 829 486 2097 596

Case 4 829 308 1877 602

Case 5 829 154 1622 543

Case 6 829 408 1985 599

Free Abutment:

Moment Moment Moment Shear

SLS Dead SLS Live ULS ULS

Case 1 394 112 835 350

Case 2a 868 265 1846 581

Case 3 868 495 2175 612

Case 4 868 318 1956 619

Case 5 868 159 1694 559

Concrete to BS 8500:2006
Use strength class C32/40 with water-cement ratio 0.5 and minimum cement content of 340kg/m 3 for exposure condition XD2.
Nominal cover to reinforcement = 60mm (45mm minimum cover plus a tolerance Δc of 15mm).
Reinforcement to BS 4449:2005 Grade B500B: fy = 500N/mm2

Design for critical moments and shear in Free Abutment:

Reinforced concrete walls are designed to BS 5400 Part 4 Clause 5.6.

Check classification to clause 5.6.1.1:
Ultimate axial load in wall from deck reactions = 2400 + 600 + 2770 = 5770 kN
0.1fcuAc = 0.1 × 40 × 10 3 × 11.6 × 1 = 46400 kN > 5770 ∴ design as a slab in accordance with clause 5.4

Bending
BS 5400 Part 4 Clause 5.4.2 → for reisitance moments in slabs design to clause 5.3.2.3:
z = {1 - [ 1.1fy As ) / (fcubd) ]} d
Use B40 @ 150 c/c in rear face at base of wall:
As = 8378mm2/m, d = 1000 - 60 - 20 = 920mm
z = {1 - [ 1.1 × 500 × 8378) / (40 × 1000 × 920) ]} d = 0.875d < 0.95d ∴ OK
Mu = (0.87fy )As z = 0.87 × 500 × 8378 × 0.875 × 920 × 10-6 = 2934kNm/m > 2175kNn/m ∴ OK

Carrying out the crack control calculation to Clause 5.8.8.2 gives a crack width of 0.2mm < 0.25mm.
Also the steel reinforcement and concrete stresses meet the limitations required in clause 4.1.1.3 ∴ serviceability requirements are
satisfied.

Shear

Shear requirements are designed to BS 5400 clause 5.4.4:

v = V / (bd) = 619 × 103 / (1000 × 920) = 0.673 N/mm2
No shear reinforcement is required when v < ξs v c

ξs = (500/d)1/4 = (500 / 920)1/4 = 0.86

v c = (0.27/γm)(100As /bwd)1/3(fcu)1/3 = (0.27 / 1.25) × ({100 × 8378} / {1000 × 920})1/3 × (40)1/3 = 0.72

ξs v c = 0.86 × 0.72 = 0.62 N/mm2 < 0.673 hence shear reinforcement should be provided, however check shear at distance H/8
(8.63 / 8 = 1.079m) up the wall.
ULS shear at Section 7H/8 for load case 4 = 487 kN
v = V / (bd) = 487 × 103 / (1000 × 920) = 0.53 N/mm2 < 0.62
Hence height requiring strengthening = 1.073 × (0.673 - 0.62) / (0.673 - 0.53) = 0.4m < d.
Provide a 500 × 500 splay at the base of the wall with B32 @ 150c/c bars in sloping face.

Early Thermal Cracking

Considering the effects of casting the wall stem onto the base slab by complying with the early thermal cracking of concrete to BD
28 then B16 horizontal lacer bars @ 150 c/c will be required in both faces in the bottom half of the wall.
Minimum area of secondary reinforcement to Clause 5.8.4.2 = 0.12% of b ad = 0.0012 × 1000 × 920 = 1104 mm2/m (use B16 @

150c/c - As = 1340mm2/m)

Base Design

Maximum bending and shear effects in the base slab will occur at sections near the front and back of the wall. Different load factors
are used for serviceability and ultimate limit states so the calculations need to be carried out for each limit state using 'at rest
pressures'
Using the Fixed Abutment Load Case 1 again as an example of the calculations:

CASE 1 - Fixed Abutment Serviceability Limit State

γ fL = 1.0 γf3 = 1.0

Weight of wall stem = 1.0 × 6.5 × 25 × 1.0 = 163kN/m
Weight of base = 6.4 × 1.0 × 25 × 1.0 = 160kN/m
Weight of backfill = 4.3 × 6.5 × 19 × 1.0 = 531kN/m
Weight of surcharge = 4.3 × 12 × 1.0 = 52kN/m
B/fill Force Fb = 0.426 × 19 × 7.5 2 × 1.0 / 2 = 228kN/m
Surcharge Force Fs = 0.426 × 12 × 7.5 × 1.0 = 38 kN/m

Restoring Effects:

Weight Lever Arm Moment About A

Stem 163 1.6 261

Base 160 3.2 512

Backfill 531 4.25 2257

Surcharge 52 4.25 221

∑= 906 ∑= 3251

Overturning Effects:

Lever Arm Moment About A

F

Backfill 288 2.5 570

Surcharge 38 3.75 143

∑= 266 ∑= 713
Bearing Pressure at toe and heel of base slab = (P / A) ± (P × e / Z)
P = 906kN/m
A = 6.4m2/m
Z = 6.42 / 6 = 6.827m3/m
Nett moment = 3251 - 713 = 2538kNm/m
Eccentricity (e) of P about centre-line of base = 3.2 - (2538 / 906) = 0.399m
Pressure under base = (906 / 6.4) ± (906 × 0.399 / 6.827)
Pressure under toe = 142 + 53 = 195kN/m2
Pressure under heel = 142 - 53 = 89kN/m 2
Pressure at front face of wall = 89 + {(195 - 89) × 5.3 / 6.4} = 177kN/m 2
Pressure at rear face of wall = 89 + {(195 - 89) × 4.3 / 6.4} = 160kN/m2

SLS Moment at a-a = (177 × 1.12 / 2) + ([195 - 177] × 1.12 / 3) - (25 × 1.0 × 1.12 / 2) = 99kNm/m (tension in bottom face).

SLS Moment at b-b = (89 × 4.32 / 2) + ([160 - 89] × 4.32 / 6) - (25 × 1.0 × 4.32 / 2) - (531 × 4.3 / 2) - (52 × 4.3 / 2) = -443kNm/m
(tension in top face).

CASE 1 - Fixed Abutment Ultimate Limit State

γ fL for concrete = 1.15

γ fL for fill and surcharge(vetical) = 1.2
γ fL for fill and surcharge(horizontal) = 1.5
Weight of wall stem = 1.0 × 6.5 × 25 × 1.15 = 187kN/m
Weight of base = 6.4 × 1.0 × 25 × 1.15 = 184kN/m
Weight of backfill = 4.3 × 6.5 × 19 × 1.2 = 637kN/m
Weight of surcharge = 4.3 × 12 × 1.2 = 62kN/m
Backfill Force Fb = 0.426 × 19 × 7.52 × 1.5 / 2 = 341kN/m
Surcharge Force Fs = 0.426 × 12 × 7.5 × 1.5 = 58 kN/m

Restoring Effects:

Weight Lever Arm Moment About A

Stem 187 1.6 299

Base 184 3.2 589

Backfill 637 4.25 2707

 Surcharge 62 4.25 264

∑= 1070 ∑= 3859

Overturning Effects:

Lever Arm Moment About A

F

Backfill 341 2.5 853

Surcharge 58 3.75 218

∑= 399 ∑= 1071

Bearing Pressure at toe and heel of base slab = (P / A) ± (P x e / Z)

P = 1070kN/m
A = 6.4m2/m
Z = 6.42 / 6 = 6.827m3/m
Nett moment = 3859 - 1071 = 2788kNm/m
Eccentricity (e) of P about centre-line of base = 3.2 - (2788 / 1070) = 0.594m
Pressure under base = (1070 / 6.4) ± (1070 × 0.594 / 6.827)
Pressure under toe = 167 + 93 = 260kN/m2
Pressure under heel = 167 - 93 = 74kN/m 2
Pressure at front face of wall = 74 + {(260 - 74) × 5.3 / 6.4} = 228kN/m 2
Pressure at rear face of wall = 74 + {(260 - 74) × 4.3 / 6.4} = 199kN/m2

γ f3 = 1.1
ULS Shear at a-a = 1.1 × {[(260 + 228) × 1.1 / 2] - (1.15 × 1.1 × 25)} = 260kN/m
ULS Shear at b-b = 1.1 × {[(199 + 74) × 4.3 / 2] - (1.15 × 4.3 × 25) - 637 - 62} = 259kN/m

ULS Moment at a-a = 1.1 × {(228 × 1.12 / 2) + ([260 - 228] × 1.12 / 3) - (1.15 × 25 × 1.0 × 1.12 / 2)} = 148kNm/m (tension in bottom
face).

ULS Moment at b-b = 1.1 × {(74 × 4.32 / 2) + ([199 - 74] × 4.32 / 6) - (1.15 × 25 × 1.0 × 4.32 / 2) - (637 × 4.3 / 2) - (62 × 4.3 / 2)} = -
769kNm/m (tension in top face).

Analysing the fixed abutment with Load Cases 1 to 6 and the free abutment with Load Cases 1 to 5 using a simple spreadsheet the
following results were obtained:

Fixed Abutment Base:

Section a-a
 ULS Shear SLS Moment ULS Moment

Case 1 261 99 147

Case 2a 528 205 302

Case 3 593 235 340

Case 4 550 208 314

Case 5 610 241 348

Case 6 637 255 365

Section b-b

ULS SLS ULS

Shear Moment Moment

Case 1 259 447 768

Case 2a 458 980 1596

Case 3 553 1178 1834

Case 4 495 1003 1700

Case 5 327 853 1402

Case 6 470 1098 1717

Free Abutment Base:

Section a-a

ULS SLS ULS

Shear Moment Moment

Case 1 267 101 151

Case 2a 534 207 305

Case 3 598 236 342

Case 4 557 211 317

Case 5 616 243 351

Section b-b
 ULS SLS ULS
Shear Moment Moment

Case 1 266 475 816

Case 2a 466 1029 1678

Case 3 559 1233 1922

Case 4 504 1055 1786

Case 5 335 901 1480

Design for shear and bending effects at sections a-a and b-b for the Free Abutment:

Bending

BS 5400 Part 4 Clause 5.7.3 → design as a slab for reisitance moments to clause 5.3.2.3:
z = {1 - [ 1.1fy As ) / (fcubd) ]} d
Use B32 @ 150 c/c:
As = 5362mm2/m, d = 1000 - 60 - 16 = 924mm
z = {1 - [ 1.1 × 500 × 5362) / (40 × 1000 × 924) ]} d = 0.92d < 0.95d ∴ OK
Mu = (0.87fy )As z = 0.87 × 500 × 5362 × 0.92 × 924 × 10-6 = 1983kNm/m > 1922kNm/m ∴ OK
(1983kNm/m also > 1834kNm/m ∴ B32 @ 150 c/c suitable for fixed abutment.

For the Serviceability check for Case 3 an approximation of the dead load moment can be obtained by removing the surcharge and
braking loads. The spreadsheet result gives the dead load SLS moment for Case 3 as 723kNm, thus the live load moment = 1233 -
723 = 510kNm.
Carrying out the crack control calculation to Clause 5.8.8.2 gives a crack width of 0.27mm > 0.25mm ∴ Fail.
This could be corrected by reducing the bar spacing, but increase the bar size to B40@150 c/c as this is required to avoid the use
of links (see below).
Using B40@150c/c the crack control calculation gives a crack width of 0.17mm < 0.25mm ∴ OK.
Also the steel reinforcement and concrete stresses meet the limitations required in clause 4.1.1.3 ∴ serviceability requirements are
satisfied.

Shear
Shear on Toe - Use Fixed Abutment Load Case 6:
By inspection B32@150c/c will be adequate for the bending effects in the toe (Muls = 365kNm < 1983kNm)
Shear requirements are designed to BS 5400 clause 5.7.3.2(a) checking shear at d away from the front face of the wall to clause
5.4.4.1:

ULS Shear on toe = 1.1 × {(620 + 599) × 0.5 × 0.176 - 1.15 × 1 × 0.176 × 25} = 112kN

v = V / (bd) = 112 × 103 / (1000 × 924) = 0.121 N/mm2

No shear reinforcement is required when v < ξs v c
Reinforcement in tension = B32 @ 150 c/c
ξs = (500/d)1/4 = (500 / 924)1/4 = 0.86

v c = (0.27/γm)(100As /bwd)1/3(fcu)1/3 = (0.27 / 1.25) × ({100 × 5362} / {1000 × 924})1/3 × (40)1/3 = 0.62

ξs v c = 0.86 × 0.62 = 0.53 N/mm2 > 0.121N/mm2 ∴ OK

Shear on Heel - Use Free Abutment Load Case 3:

Shear requirements are designed at the back face of the wall to clause 5.4.4.1:

Length of heel = (6.5 - 1.1 - 1.0) = 4.4m

ULS Shear on heel = 1.1 × {348 × 0.5 × (5.185 - 2.1) - 1.15 × 1 × 4.4 × 25 - 1.2 × 4.4 × (8.63 × 19 + 10)} = 559kN

Using B32@150 c/c then:

v = V / (bd) = 559 × 103 / (1000 × 924) = 0.605 N/mm2
No shear reinforcement is required when v < ξs v c

ξs = (500/d)1/4 = (500 / 924)1/4 = 0.86

v c = (0.27/γm)(100As /bwd)1/3(fcu)1/3 = (0.27 / 1.25) × ({100 × 5362} / {1000 × 924})1/3 × (40)1/3 = 0.62
ξs v c = 0.86 × 0.62 = 0.53 N/mm2 < 0.605N/mm2 ∴ Fail
Rather than provide shear reinforcement try increasing bars to B40 @ 150 c/c (also required for crack control as shown above).
v c = (0.27/γm)(100As /bwd)1/3(fcu)1/3 = (0.27 / 1.25) × ({100 × 8378} / {1000 × 920})1/3 × (40)1/3 = 0.716

ξs v c = 0.86 × 0.716 = 0.616 N/mm2 > 0.605N/mm2 ∴ OK

Early Thermal Cracking

Considering the effects of casting the base slab onto the blinding concrete by complying with the early thermal cracking of concrete
to BD 28 then B16 distribution bars @ 250 c/c will be required.
Minimum area of main reinforcement to Clause 5.8.4.1 = 0.15% of bad = 0.0015 × 1000 × 924 = 1386 mm2/m (use B20 @ 200c/c -

As = 1570mm2/m).

Local Effects

Curtain Wall
This wall is designed to be cast onto the top of the abutment after the deck has been built. Loading will be applied from the backfill,
surcharge and braking loads on top of the wall.

HB braking load to BS 5400 clause 6.10 = 25% × 45units × 4 × 10kN on 2 axles = 225kN per axle.
To allow for load distribution effects assume a 45o dispersal to the curtain wall and a 45o dispersal down the wall, with maximum
dispersal of the width of the abutment (11.6m).
This crude analysis will slightly underestimate the peak values in the wall below the load, but allowance can be made when
designing the reinforcement to ensure there is spare capacity. Then:
1st axle load on back of abutment = 225 / 3.0 = 75kN/m
Dispersed to the base of the curtain wall = 225 / 9.0 = 25 kN/m
2nd axle load on back of abutment = 225 / 6.6 = 34.1kN/m
Dispersed to the base of the curtain wall = 225 / 11.6 = 19.4 kN/m

For load effects at the top of the curtain wall:

Maximum load on back of abutment = 75 + 34.1 = 109.1kN/m
For load effects at the base of the curtain wall:
Maximum load on back of abutment = 25 + 19.4 = 44.4kN/m

Bending and Shear at Base of 3m High Curtain Wall

Horizontal load due to HB surcharge = 0.426 × 20 × 3.0 = 25.6 kN/m

Horizontal load due to backfill = 0.426 × 19 × 3.02 / 2 = 36.4 kN/m
SLS Moment = (44.4 × 3.0) + (25.6 × 1.5) + (36.4 × 1.0) = 208 kNm/m (36 dead + 172 live)
ULS Moment = 1.1 × {(1.1 × 44.4 × 3.0) + (1.5 × 25.6 × 1.5) + (1.5 × 36.4 × 1.0)} = 285 kNm/m
ULS Shear = 1.1 × {(1.1 × 44.4) + (1.5 × 25.6) + (1.5 × 36.4)} = 156kN/m

400 thick curtain wall with B32 @ 150 c/c :

Mult = 584 kNm/m > 285 kNm/m ∴ OK
SLS Moment produces crack width of 0.14mm < 0.25 ∴ OK
ξs v c = 0.97 N/mm2 > v = 0.48 N/mm2 ∴ Shear OK

Back to Examples Index | Back to Tutorials Index

Contact David Childs

Last Updated: 13/08/2019

Contact Cookie Info

 Contact Cookie Info
DAVID CHILDS Site Map Privacy Policy
B.SC, C.ENG, MICE
Terms of Use