Sliding Sleeve
Sliding Sleeve
Sliding Sleeve
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Western Regional Meeting held in Garden Grove, California, USA, 27–30 April 2015.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents
of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect
any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written
consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may
not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
Abstract
A ball-activated sliding sleeve design for multistage cemented lateral completions has been developed that
allows multiple frac sleeves to be opened using the same diameter ball, significantly increasing the total
number of sleeves available in the completion design. This paper discusses the sleeve design, the
challenges associated with cemented laterals, the results of initial field installations, and the ramifications
for completion design and execution.
Ball-activated sleeves were introduced to overcome limitations of plug and perf designs and facilitate
longer and more complex completions. As these completions have evolved, the technology has reached
inherent design limitations. This is especially true in cemented lateral completions. These installations
require a series of incrementally smaller balls and ball seats that reduce wellbore ID and ultimately limit
the total number of sleeves that can be used in the completion.
To further extend lateral length and accommodate the cemented laterals, a sliding sleeve device has
been developed that allows multiple sliding sleeve valves to be opened with the same size ball and seat.
The sliding sleeve design allows up to 90 individual sleeves to be opened as a single point of entry
completion without dropping a ball diameter smaller than 4.00-in. in 5.500-in. casing, or a 3.25-in. ball
in 4.500-in. casing. This increases wellbore ID over the length of the completion, and increases the total
number of sleeves or sleeve clusters that can be employed in the completion design. The higher number
of available sleeves affects the completion design, whether it uses single sleeve per stage or clusters of
sleeves. In addition, lateral length of the completion is not constrained by the number of sleeves or the
reach of coiled tubing.
Cemented installations in the US Marcellus, Utica Shale, and Spraberry plays have enabled single-
point-of-entry stimulations that optimize hydraulic fracturing pressure and provide a focused frac. In some
applications, this has reduced pump rates and surface horsepower requirements by as much as 50% and
also reduced the overall frac time. Experience also indicates these completions reduce water requirements
by minimizing over-flushing of the formation. These cemented installations illustrate the potential of
continued changes in completion designs and the viability of longer laterals.
This paper is the first published examination of field performance in the initial installations of the
sliding sleeve technology. Field results and data from sleeves installed in Marcellus, Utica Shale, and
Spraberry completions are presented. Based on performance in these applications, the paper reviews
2 SPE-174075-MS
completion design considerations facilitated by the ability to install larger numbers of sliding sleeves over
longer cemented laterals.
Introduction
The majority of cased hole horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs require multi-stage stimulations.
This calls for some form of isolation between the frac stages. (Blevins and Frazier, 2011) There are three
primary methods of achieving this isolation: cemented plug-and-perf (P&P), openhole completions with
ball activated sliding sleeves, and cemented cased hole completions with ball activated sliding sleeves.
The development of these methods describes a continued evolution aimed at improving efficiency and
extending the capabilities of multi-stage stimulation.
Cemented Plug-and-Perf Completions
Cemented P&P methods have been used for decades and are the oldest and most frequently used
multistage stimulation method. Once production casing or liner is cemented in place, the plug and perf
process isolates the stage by pumping a bridge plug down hole on wireline along with perforating guns.
The plug is set, the zone is perforated, and the tools are pulled out of the hole. The zone is stimulated with
the plug diverting fluid into the formation. This process is repeated until all zones have been stimulated.
To flow back the well after the treatment, coiled tubing is used to mill out the plugs.
P&P operations are typically a slow, expensive process with inherent technological limitations in
longer, more complex completions. Perforation clusters present frac delivery and production performance
issues, and the pump-down technique requires over displacement that can consist of several hundred
barrels of fluid. (Phelan et al. 2013) The plugs are also problematic due to wellbore restrictions,
over-torque of casing collars, dogleg severity, and casing buckling. (Blevins and Frazier, 2011)
The use of coiled tubing to drill out the plugs presents another set of limitations based mechanical
capabilities and added cost. As wells become deeper and more deviated, much of the strength and capacity
of coiled tubing to do work downhole is lost to frictional drag in the wellbore. (Kilgore, 1992) In deep
wells, small diameter tubing must be used to accommodate reel capacity and road restrictions, which
limits pumping rates because of pressure and velocity. (McNeil et al. 2011) Using coiled tubing for
drillout in very long laterals can be complex and require an aggressively tapered string and the use of
friction reducers and vibration tools to apply enough WOB to mill out all the completion plugs. (Asafa
et al. 2014) Coiled tubing drillout of composite or cast iron bridge plugs and isolation sleeves often results
in drilling problems such as poor fluid efficiency and hole cleaning issues, lost circulation, stuck pipe,
lost-in-hole tools, and parted pipes. (Liston and Lynn, 2014.)
Openhole Sliding Sleeve Completions
Open-hole multi-stage completions using sliding sleeve technology were introduced in or around 2001 to
enable selective zonal stimulation, enhance production management. The continuous frac operations
facilitated by sliding sleeves improved efficiency and eliminated the downtime associated with P&P
operations. Typical sliding sleeve completions are accomplished in a fraction of the time required to
complete a plug-and-perf operation, and the reduced pump time lowers the overall cost of the completion.
(Snyder and Seale, 2012) (Bozeman and Degner, 2009)
This process first runs the production casing or liner and openhole multistage assembly into the well.
The first frac sleeve (typically pressure activated) is opened and the treatment is pumped. When the stage
is completed, the next sleeve activation ball is dropped. This continues until the continuous pumping cycle
is complete. Millout via coiled tubing is sometimes required to flow back the well, although this has been
reduced by the advent of dissolving or decaying activation balls.
The ball provides two key functions -–– opening the sliding sleeve via hydraulic force and sealing to
allow the treatment to be pumped. Activation of multiple sliding sleeves requires incrementally sized balls
SPE-174075-MS 3
and seats, which ultimately limit the number of sleeves that can be used. This was not an issue in openhole
completion where a single sleeve can effectively stimulate a 200 to 300 ft openhole zone, and there are
typically 20 or fewer stages.
Figure 1—Plug and perf completion (left) and single-point-of-entry with cemented sliding sleeve (right)
at which point the ball seats to open the frac ports and divert the stimulation treatment. This process
repeats itself up the wellbore until each of the 10 sleeves has been activated and stimulated. Upon
completion of the sequence, the next set of 10 slightly larger balls is dropped. Nine ball sizes allow for
90 independent single-point-of-entry stimulations.
The large ID ball seats eliminate the pressure drop and flow rate restrictions exhibited by conventional
incremental ball seats. With 90 individual sleeves to design with, the total stage count can be increased
without having to increase the stage length.
Sliding Sleeve Design
Sliding sleeve operation in a cemented environment presents different considerations than an openhole
application. Because the ID of the device is exposed to the cement slurry, as well as wiper plugs and the
frac treatment, an important design factor was the need to keep moving parts and critical components out
of the flow path. Optimizing the flow paths was important to tool clean up after the cement was placed
and a large ID was needed to accommodate heavy-duty cementing plugs.
The core objective in the design was to address the growing number of stages in long horizontal laterals
by enabling the maximum number of sleeves to be used in the completion. Various means of maximizing
sleeve numbers have been tried but the mechanical solutions are complex. These have included assemblies
of control valves and tethered control lines as well as very long mechanical systems.
A sliding sleeve design employing a series of large ball sizes to open ten sleeves per ball size was
developed to significantly increase the number of available sleeves. The key to the technology is a linear
indexing mechanism that is preset to count a specific number of balls before opening the sleeve. This
allows individual sleeves or series of sleeves to be opened. (Fig 2)
Figure 2—Sliding sleeve design employs a linear indexing mechanism that is preset to count a specific number of balls before opening
the sleeve.
The indexing system is based on common body lock ring technology that consists of an indexing sleeve
and inner mandrel. As each ball passes through the tool, the mechanical indexer changes one position. For
example, if the indexer is set at the number ten position, the first ball moves it to the number nine position;
the second ball moves it to position eight. When the 10th ball is dropped, the indexing sleeve is moved
to the final position, and the ball seats in a frac C-ring to open the sleeve and divert the treatment.
The system achieves a good deal of design flexibility and risk mitigation. For example, a smaller
completion with 20 sleeves can be done with two sets of 10 sleeves, or four sets of five sleeves.
Frac Ball Development
Frac ball design is a central aspect of the sliding sleeve technology. Key to this was eliminating the
potential of a costly drillout by developing dissolvable balls for the large ID seats. While 3 ¾¾-in.
6 SPE-174075-MS
diameter balls are typically the largest size made, the smallest ball in the sliding sleeve system is 4 in. for
the 5.500-in. completion.
In addition to manufacturing, the larger balls affect performance characteristics. The volume of the ball
doubles as the size increases and the ball takes longer to dissolve. The ball also travels differently in the
pipe. Compared to smaller conventional balls that travel more easily with the flow, a larger, heaver ball
tends to roll, which slows travel time. Stresses on the tool and ball are also increased, which lead to
increases in the surface area of the ball and seat.
System Testing
A series of test were performed to develop and qualify the sliding sleeve technology. Torque testing was
conducted to determine the ability of the tools to withstand installation, which can involve rotation of the
assembly. Flow loops were used to test impact levels and how the tool and ball perform together. Flow
loop tests were also done to establish how cement plugs move through the tools. Pressure testing was done
on ball and seat components to ensure the appropriate surface contact area, strength and operating
pressures.
Figure 4 —Six stages pumped in less than 10 hours with continuous fracing process
8 SPE-174075-MS
Figure 5—Point “““A””” indicates ball action with following pressure higher than preceding pressure
With the sleeve fully open, the treatment follows the planned schedule. When the stage is concluded
a 50-100 bbl spacer is pumped at full rate and the next size ball is dropped to initiate the indexing and
opening of the sleeve up hole. This process continues with each stage and set of sleeves. Tables 1 and 2
compare the frac schedule of a P&P completion to a sliding sleeve completion. The flush and treated water
requirments for the sleeve completion is significanty less than that of the P&P completion.
Tables 1 and 2 show pumping schedules for P&P and sliding sleeve applications. While the order of
the frac delivery remains the same, P&P is pumped as a single stage while the sliding sleeve treatment
is pumped in increments.
Case Studies
Recent installations of the sliding sleeve in the US Marcellus, Utica Shale, and the Permian’s Spraberry,
have enabled single-point-of-entry stimulations that reduced pump rates and surface horsepower require-
ments by as much as 50% compared to plug and perf completions. Continuous fracturing operations
achieved with the system greatly reduced completion times and contributed to a savings of more than
$500,000 USD per well.
An 11 well data set, including wells in the US Marcellus, Utica, and Spraberry shale is presented in
this paper. Within the two data sets, there were three primary field applications. Table 3 is the installation
data set. All the wells in the set were 5.500 ft cemented laterals, ranging from a lateral length of 3,203
to 9,670 ft. Table 4 is the stimulation data set for the 11 wells. The average frac rate for these wells ranged
from 30 to 51 bpm. The average frac pressure ranged from 3,477 to 7,861 psi.
First Application
Job numbers 1 through 4 represent the first application. Within this application, the objective was for the
operator to complete the entire lateral with sleeves. This offered the operator the opportunity to prove the
effectiveness of the entire system across the entire lateral, further enabling him to compare the overall
results to comparable offset P&P wells.
The total sleeve count for these wells ranged from 36 to 45, covering lateral lengths of 3,203 to 4,480
ft. According to information obtained from the operator, the wells were completed in less than half the
time as their comparable offset P&P wells. The continuous frac operations resulted in substantial
timesavings. The frac time from ball drop to ball drop ranged from 1-1/2 to 2 hours on average.
In addition to the timesavings, the average frac rate was less than half that of the comparable offsets.
The operator was able to stimulate the entire lateral in less time, with less horsepower, and put away close
to 100% of the sand as noted in Table 2.
Second Application
Job numbers 7 through 11 represent the second application, which involved extended reach laterals.
Historically, the operator was inefficient in completing the laterals beyond 6,000 ft. In this application, the
operator installed sleeves in the lower 3-4,000 ft of the laterals. This type of application is often referred
to as a hybrid completion. Similar to the first application, these hybrid completions allowed the operator
to stimulate with less horsepower and time, increasing the overall efficiency. Table 5 and 6 compare
horsepower consumption for job number 8. Table 5 illustrates the single-point-of-entry sleeves, while
Table 6 illustrates the P&P portion of the completion. An average 4,005 hp was needed to complete sleeve
stages 1 to 39 while an average 9,681 hp was was used to complete P&P stages 40 to 56. The reduction
of horsepower and time allowed for a more cost effective and efficient completion of these extended reach
laterals.
SPE-174075-MS 11
Table 5—
12 SPE-174075-MS
Table 6 —
Third Application
In the third application, which is represented by job numbers 5 and 6, the operator installed a minimal
number of sleeves in the lower 1,000 to 2,000 ft of the lateral. This was done to prove that the sleeves
worked mechanically and stimulation could be done at 50% of the normal horsepower and rate. As noted
in Table 4, these two wells were stimulated at rates of 30 and 51 bpm, respectively.
As can be seen in Table 4, a total 325 stages were stimulated with the cemented frac sleeve system.
The frac rates varied from 30 to 51 bpm. The average treating pressures ranged from 3,477 to 7,861
psi.
Figure 4 illustrates stages 14-19 on a Marcellus frac. In this case, six stages were completed in less than
10 hours with the continuous fracing operation offered by the ball activated frac sleeves. The ball seating
on the seat is indicated as point (a) on the figure.
Figure 5 illustrates the ball action on a sleeve more closely. The ball action is noted as point (a) on the
figure. As the rate is held constant, the pressure after the ball action is higher than the pressure before the
ball action. This is an indication that they were injecting into a new zone.
Conclusions
Cemented completions using the sliding sleeve technology have shown the mechanical functionality of the
system and some of economic and design capabilities. This was achieved in various applications,
including extended reach laterals; complete well bore installations; and hybrid systems using the sleeves
in only the lower portion of the lateral. More than 500 sleeves have been successfully installed.
These applications have shown that the ball-activated sliding sleeve design for multi-zone cemented
lateral completions successfully addresses a number of key factors needed to enhance completion
effectiveness and efficiency, including:
● With large ID ball seats, a 90-stage system can be designed with 90 sleeves using one sleeve per
stage. The 90 independent sleeves accommodate cemented laterals in excess of 10,000 ft.
● The sleeves enable single-point-of-entry stimulation that directs hydraulic fracturing pressure
through a single sleeve instead of distributing energy across multiple clusters of perforations.
● Single-point-of-entry stimulation improves efficiency. The focused stimulation results in a more
effective frac job by specifically placing the frac through a single sleeve. Individually stimulating
each isolated sleeve greatly reduces pump rates and surface horsepower requirements.
SPE-174075-MS 13
● Surface horsepower requirements have been cut up to 50% and costs per well have been
dramatically reduced. The system allows rates of just 40-50 bpm compared to standard 100-bpm
frac job using plug and perf methods.
● Less horsepower on location reduces the wellsite footprint and logistical support.
● Overall frac time and water requirements are lowered because stimulating through ball-activated
frac sleeves is a continuous operation, which also minimizes over-flushing the formation. Each
subsequent zone is typically stimulated with less than 50 bbls of over flush. Balls are dropped for
subsequent zones at full rate from surface as the final sand stage is being pumped into the previous
zone. This efficiency eliminates the downtime associated with plug and perf operations.
● In contrast with plug and perf methods, the system enhances safety with no requirements for perf
guns on location
● The system eliminates the water lines and cranes required for pump down in plug and perf
operations.
References
Blevins, J., Frazier, G. 2011. A Unique Plug For A Restricted Wellbore. Paper SPE-146559-MS
presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 October-2 November, Denver,
Colorado, USA
Phelan, K., Adefashe, H., Casero, A., 2013. Open Hole Multi-Stage Completion System in Uncon-
ventional Plays: Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economics. Paper SPE 164009 presented at SPE
Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, 28-30 January, Muscat, Oman
Kilgore, M. 1992. New Muscle for Coiled Tubing. Paper OTC-7034-MS presented at Offshore
Technology Conference, 4 May, Houston, Texas
McNeil, F., Lindsay, S., Lyons, R., Gracey, R. 2011. New Hybrid System Brings the Flexibility of
Coiled Tubing to Very Long Extended-Reach Wells. Paper SPE-142769-MS presented at SPE/
ICoTA Coiled Tubing & Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, 5-6 April, The Woodlands,
Texas, USA
Asafa, K., Williams, B., Gonzalez, A., Wiskofske, M. 2014 Improving Post-Stimulation Coiled
Tubing Drillout. Paper SPE-168290-MS presented at SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well
Intervention Conference and Exhibition, 25-26 March, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
Liston, R., Lynn, C. 2014. Going Long - Overcoming Challenges in Completing 3600m Laterals.
Paper SPE-170831-MS presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 27-29
October, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Snyder, D., Seale, R. 2012. Comparison of Production Results From Openhole and Cemented
Multistage Completions in the Marcellus Shale. Paper SPE-155095-MS presented at SPE Amer-
icas Unconventional Resources Conference, 5-7 June, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania USA
Bozeman, T., Degner, D. 2009. Cemented Ball-Activated Sliding Sleeves Improve Well Economics
and Efficiency. Paper SPE-124120-MS presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and
Exhibition, 4-7 October, New Orleans, Louisiana
Ferguson, K., Hunter, M., Thomas, C., Wellhoefer, B.,Ingram, S., and Matthew Montes, M. 2012.
Cementing Sleeve Fracture Completion in Eagle Ford Shale will Forever Change the Delivery of
Hydraulic Fracturing. Paper SPE 158490 presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and
Exhibition, 8-10 October, San Antonio, Texas, USA