resources

Communication
Green Consumer Behavior in the Cosmetics Market
Nora Amberg 1 and Csaba Fogarassy 2, *
1 Doctoral School of Management and Business Administration, Szent Istvan University, Pater Karoly st. 1,
2100 Godollo, Hungary
2 Climate Change Economics Research Centre, Szent Istvan University, Pater Karoly 1, 2100 Godollo, Hungary
* Correspondence: [email protected]




Received: 30 June 2019; Accepted: 28 July 2019; Published: 30 July 2019


Abstract: Consumers and producers are becoming more open to the usage of natural cosmetics.
This can be seen in them using a variety of natural cosmetic resources and materials. This fact is
further supported by the trend of environmental and health awareness. These phenomena can be
found within both the producers’ and the consumers’ behavior. Our research supports that green
or natural products’ role in the cosmetics industry is getting more and more pronounced. The role
of science is to determine the variables suggesting the consumer to change to natural cosmetics.
The primary aim of our research is to find out to what extent the characteristics of the consumption of
organic foods and natural cosmetics differ. We would like to know what factors influence consumer
groups when buying green products. The novelty of the analyses is mainly that consumers were
ordered into clusters, based on consuming bio-foodstuffs and preferring natural cosmetics. The cluster
analysis has multiple variables, namely: Consumer behavior in light of bio-product, new natural
cosmetics brand, or health- and environmental awareness preferences. The data was collected using
online questionnaire, exclusively in Hungary during April–May of 2018. 197 participants answered
our questions. The results of descriptive statistics and the cluster analysis show that there are
consumers who prefer natural cosmetics, whereas some of them buy traditional ones. A third group
use both natural and ordinary cosmetics. The results suggest that on the market of cosmetic products,
health and environmental awareness will be a significant trend for both producer and consumer
behavior, even in the future. However, it will not necessarily follow the trends of the foodstuffs
industry, as the health effect spectrum of cosmetics is far shorter. In the future, the palette of natural
cosmetics will become much wider. The main reason for this will be the appearance of green cosmetics
materials and environmentally friendly production methods (mostly for packaging). The consumers
will also have the possibility to choose the ones that suit them the most.

Keywords: natural cosmetics; green cosmetics; bio-foodstuffs; consumer behavior;

consumer preference

1. Introduction
Currently, a variety of greentech solutions are available in the cosmetics industry. Using these
solutions, environment-friendly natural cosmetics can be produced. There is a multitude of research
into the use of new environmentally friendly technological solutions as well. This study mainly focuses
on introducing the effects of environmental and health awareness trends on the cosmetics industry,
for both the producer and consumer sides. The main point of the analysis was to perfectly identify
the factors influencing green consumer behavior. The factors important for the analysis of research
questions were found using primary research, specifically, online questionnaire. Based on the literature
sources, the following were reviewed: A short history of natural cosmetics, the specifics differentiating
between cosmetics, the development of environmental protection principles, the security regulations

Resources 2019, 8, 137; doi:10.3390/resources8030137 www.mdpi.com/journal/resources

Resources 2019, 8, 137 2 of 19

of the European Union related to cosmetics, the producer/organisational behavior for producing
cosmetics, and the consumer behavior related to cosmetics. Our research was partly based on the 2016
research of Matić and Puh [1]. They already conducted a similar analysis for the Croatian consumers.
However, they used a different method for their analysis (binary logistical regression model). They
also didn’t take note of the connections with foodstuffs consuming habits. In light of these points, our
research wants to find first and foremost, the effects of the trends of consuming bio-foodstuffs and using
natural cosmetics have on each other. Furthermore, we wish to determine grouping for consumers
based on their usage of natural cosmetics, and find possible future trends based on the groups formed.
The main purpose of our research is to gain a clear picture of the similarities and differences in the
consumption habits of organic foods and natural cosmetics. The results of these studies allow us to
draw conclusions about what additional information is needed to develop healthy consuming culture.
By learning about each group, communication and education strategies or programs can be defined.

1.1. A Short History of Cosmetics

The history of cosmetics can be said to have started during ancient Egypt. Their usage had,
first and foremost, hygienic purposes and health advantages [2–4]. The usage that also has advantages
for healthcare, or fighting against the aging of the skin are relatively new approaches to cosmetics. The
‘cosmeceuticals’ (which is a combination of “cosmetics” and “pharmaceuticals”) word was first used
by Albert Kligman in 1984, in order to have an expert definition of products offering both cosmetic and
therapy value. Beauty, however, comes from the inside. The aging of skin also has a significant relation
with eating habits—which is also supported by multiple instances of research [2,5]. These research
materials also describe the skin’s history, its chemical constitution, and sources. Researchers were
able to prove that a variety of materials have a positive effect on dermal health either in their effect
mechanism, or in their function. They used mainly animal and clinical research and experiment data
to determine biological and bio-medicinal effects for the following: Collagen, Ceramide, Beta-carotid,
Astaxanthin, Coenzyme Q10 , colostrum, Zinc, and Selene. During the Antiquity Age, people used
natural elements (water, salts, and metals) and plant and animal extracts for healthcare and cosmetic
goals [2,6,7].
Nowadays, the trend of using and seeking natural materials and additives is on the rise. This is
most notable for cosmetic products. The reason for the increase in popularity is that the negative
effects synthetic materials have on health and the environment were made apparent. Currently,
marketing trends are turning towards natural solutions for cosmetics, which have a relation to healthy
lifestyle, and link cosmetic product usage to healthy eating habits [6]. During recent decades, the
role of cosmetics degraded on the level of the entirety of society. Many products became a natural
part of everyday life. Most products, like soap, shampoo, toothpaste, and such, became parts of
our everyday hygiene, where most notable preferences are based on price level, instead of the
environmental-friendliness of the product. A similar effect could be observed for sunscreens, where the
protection of the skin is mandatory. Makeup is also a natural part of everyday life now, they are a tool
for a confident look [8]. Based on our ethno-botanical knowledge, we can state that consumers used
natural materials for skincare and to improve their looks until recently. However, due to healthcare
problems becoming global, and interest in skincare (mainly due to UV rays) becoming more intensive,
the need for much more efficient plant extracts became more pronounced [9]. Therefore, we can
assume that in the future, the trends of eating habits and cosmetics may separate, and show a different
tendency in the future.
The history of cosmetics is shaped parallel to that of humanity, which had relied on fishing,
hunting, and superstitions in its early days. Later, it turned towards medicine and pharmacies.
Cosmetics also changed along with the changes in humanity. Nowadays, the cosmetics market is
vastly different from the industry mentioned earlier. It became incredibly competitive and global,
where quality, efficiency, and safety are all highly important. Consumers also became extremely
refined, therefore, scientific research and product development became steps producers cannot skip.
Resources 2019, 8, 137 3 of 19

Furthermore, consumers are well aware of environmental protection and sustainability questions
(animal protection, active agent—pollutant relations). Therefore, new cosmetic ingredients also have
to pass an environmental protection criterion. The newest development trends of cosmetics are based
on researching the natural ingredients that block skin aging.

1.2. Main Specifics of Cosmetic Products, Practice of Using Natural Materials

Current environmental problems are stimuli for the consumers, encouraging them to buy green
products. Green or natural products are developed along ecological standards, and perfected as such.
Green products have a variety of advantages, for example: Less water, material and energy usage
during production, non or slightly pollutant to natural environments, and their packaging can be
recycled [10,11]. Commercially available green products also include green cosmetics. Consumers
devote more and more time to understand these products. Green or natural cosmetics are made
out of natural resources, without the usage of chemicals, coloring additives, or other non-natural
mixtures [12,13]. Green cosmetics are also often called organic cosmetics, which should not be
mistaken for each other. Organic cosmetics have a much more strict definition, and selling them in
consumer systems can also be a significant challenge (storage, expiration, etc.). The reason is that
organic cosmetics have to offer a maximized environmental efficiency, stability, and security [11].
Green cosmetics are often more expensive, which may result in less consumers being able to buy them.
Interest in green, sustainable, and natural products, however, is on the rise on the market of cosmetics
and body care products [14]. Green cosmetics are multi-faceted constructions usually aimed at the
following: Environmental conservation, minimisation of polluting, responsible usage of non-renewable
resources, and preservation of fauna and species. Green or environmentally friendly products are
mainly products defined as non-hazardous to natural resources and renewable. They can basically be
used without harming the environment. Green cosmetics are natural cosmetics, primarily made up of
plant and fruit extracts and concentrates [15].
According to the documentation on plants used as cosmetics “Choa Arabian and Kotoko ethnic
groups’ knowledge in Korusseria (Far North Region of Cameroon)”, trees are the plants most used
for cosmetic purposes, mainly by using their bark and seeds. People in this region use more than
40% of the registered plants found here for skincare. The valuable phytochemical ingredients in
cosmetics can be found in all of said plants. These plants can also be used effectively in dermatology,
furthermore, they have an anti-oxidant property. They can serve as materials for perfume, have
anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, and curative effects on wounds. They have a skin whitening effect as
well, can be applied to tooth cavities, they constrict skin pores and gums, and are effective materials in
hair care. Usage of the plant cosmetic ingredients and the ancient knowledge of the Choa Arabian and
Kotoko people are tightly linked, however, most of these plants are less researched in the industry of
cosmetics [16]. For example, more and more cosmetic products contain shea butter. Shea trees grow on
4 million square kilometres in Sub-Sahara Africa. Shea parks are a sustainable source for consumable
fats (shea butter) [17].
Ingredients that come from marine creatures and algae are also found in many cosmetics [14].
Many biologically active materials that can be used for cosmetic purposes can be extracted from marine
lifeforms. Such as algae (macro- and micro-algae) as a prime example. Their usage in cosmetic products
can be accredited to their skincare attributes. Algae hydrate the skin, aid circulation, activate the
renewal and metabolism of cells, regulate the operation of sebaceous glands, regenerate tissue, have an
anti-inflammatory effect, and increase skin resistance [18].
Bio-active ingredients coming from natural sources have a well-known positive effect in cosmetic
usage, which also serve as incentive for consumers. Of these, gallotannins have a very intriguing
potential. Caffeic acid (CAF) is one of the most promising active ingredients, since it is an anti-oxidant,
anti-inflammatory, and anti-wrinkle as well. In case of local usage, increasing its biological availability
may lead to source material expecting new cosmetic interest. Clay minerals also have exceptional
qualities, among others, low or no toxicity, and high bio-compatibility [19].
Resources 2019, 8, 137 4 of 19

Color is a key factor in the product, which may be an incentive to consumers. Cosmetics can
have added coloring in order to color either the product, or a part of the body (skin, hair, nails,
and eyelashes). In case of the latter, color cosmetics is the area showing a high-level growth within the
cosmetics industry. There are cosmetics which are applied to the skin for a longer time, like rouge,
creme, and body lotion. There are also those that can be washed off, removable shortly after use, like
shampoo, gel, and soap [20,21].
Colorings can be classified by their structure, source, color, method of application, and solubility.
According to solubility, there are two categories: Colorings and pigments. Colorings are synthetic
organic materials which are soluble in water or oil within the cosmetic product, like skincare or finery
products. Pigments are not soluble, they remain inside the molecules, therefore, they are mainly used
in toothpaste, or decorative makeup products [20–22]. Among the thousands of materials used as
coloring, synthetic coloring is more advantageous to produce compared to natural (extracted from
plants, animals, and minerals). The reason is their production costs are lower and their preservative
qualities like resistance to light, heat, or pH value. Therefore, synthetic colorings are the most
widespread in the industry. The analytic check required to approve a cosmetic product’s safety are
in place due to their potential secondary effect on human health and the regulation requirements of
their usage on the cosmetics market. However, cosmetic ingredients like preservatives, or UV shields
can’t be identified within cosmetics using the methods available for determining coloring agents.
Furthermore, most of the methods at hand only take consideration of a part of regulated coloring [20].
Most of the cosmetic products contain aromatic ingredients in order to make the product more
desirable and pleasant for the consumer. Everybody likes a fragrant cosmetic. Aromatics can also
be found in hygienic products, perfumes, scented cosmetics, etc. In other words, the usage of said
ingredients is quite widespread. Sadly, one of the most notable consequences of coming into contact
with aromatics is contact dermatitis. The disadvantage of this healthcare problem is the significant
decrease in life quality. Therefore, the security evaluation of cosmetic products must be improved,
in order to defend against skin sensitivity more efficiently. In recent decades, chemically induced
contact allergy mechanisms were researched extensively, thus giving us a much deeper understanding.
There are multiple in vitro methods to identify hazards now [23]. The appearance of chemical allergy
is important for toxicologists, who mostly deal with identifying and describing the irritation potential
of chemicals on skin (and respiratory system). They also deal with estimating human health risks.
The allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a health risk that can be avoided entirely in most cases [24].
The safety of cosmetic products can be determined using consecutive steps, which is basically a
filtering-type security evaluation.
Based on this, the first question is if the ingredient is used in other body care products. If the
answer is “Yes”, do we have security guidelines concerning its usage, and in case of “No”, tests have
to be conducted, like clinical analyses. If we have access to information on safe and secure usage,
the question is if we have access to product-specific information on safe and secure usage. If we have
no such information, the usage concentration has to be benchmarked to historical usage. In case
this is more than the allowed level, there’s a need for tests (in silico, in vitro, or clinical). In case the
cosmetic product has product-specific information, then we can consider it safe for usage. Unknown,
or “No” answers mean that tests have to be conducted (Figure 1) [25]. The physiological function
of skin is inversely proportional to the skin’s age. These changes are induced by internal (time) and
external (mainly UV-induced) factors. Using a variety of plants has a potential advantage in the fight
against aging. Such advantages are effects pertaining to anti-inflammation, anti-oxidation, hydration,
UV-protection, and other effects. These are mainly found in argan oil, coconut oil, crocin, feverfew,
green tea, calendula, pomegranate, and soy [26].
Resources 2019, 8, 137 5 of 19
Resources 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 19

Figure 1. Screening level safety assessment framework based on Fung et al. [25].
Figure 1. Screening level safety assessment framework based on Fung et al. [25].
There is a significant interest towards natural products useful in skincare cosmetics that
1.3. Environmental Protection and Sustainability on the Cosmetics Market
are non-toxic [27]. Skin whitening products for cosmetic purposes are accessible in commerce.
TheirEnvironmental
function is to make protection problems became
the appearance a mainstay
of skin better [28]. in public opinion
Surface-active in recent decades.
ingredients This
are materials
serves as
which areana incentive
mainstayfor in consumers
the structure to buy green products.
of cosmetics, Theand
fineries, increasing
personal awareness of consumers
care products, due to
towards
increasing preferring green
their effects. products
Dimer is placingingredients
surface-active green consumption
are betterinto thanfocus
any of more
the and
other,more. Based
traditional
on the global research
surface-active ingredients of Nielsen in 2015,
in all areas. the are
They number of consumers
exceptionally that wish
promising for to reach
usage inan increased
a variety of
interest
cosmeticinproducts,
green products is highest cremes,
like shampoos, in the Asian-Pacific region [11,30].
and conditioners. Dimers increase the effectiveness of
In light
cosmetics to of this, greendegree,
a significant strategyand became a critical
offer the human element
epidermisof business sustainability,
environmentally since
friendly in reality,
products to
few companies are capable of realising a green strategy on an organisational level [11,31].
use [29].
“Green” or “environment-friendly” refer to the values, attitudes, understandings, knowledge,
1.3. Environmental
and behavior related Protection and Sustainability
to the environment. on the Cosmetics
Companies capableMarket
of realising environmental incentives
motivate
Environmental protection problems became a mainstay inthe
consumers to purchase green products, and also aid publicglobal trend in
opinion of recent
environmental
decades.
protection [11].
This serves as an incentive for consumers to buy green products. The increasing awareness of
A reason
consumers for social
towards concern
preferring greenin products
environmental awareness
is placing is the depletion
green consumption of mineral
into focus more andand
petrochemical resources, which is also used as reasoning to create a more
more. Based on the global research of Nielsen in 2015, the number of consumers that wish to reach an circular (closed material
and energy
increased cycle) in
interest economy [32]. In is
green products this process,
highest theAsian-Pacific
in the role of Life Cycle
regionAssessment
[11,30]. (LCA) is highly
important,
In light of this, green strategy became a critical element of business sustainability, sincetaking
since it deals with the analysis of effects products have on the environment, the
in reality,
entire production chain, and the product’s whole shelf-life into account
few companies are capable of realising a green strategy on an organisational level [11,31]. [33].
Cosmetic
“Green” or and personal body care products
“environment-friendly” refer toarethe
widely used
values, in massive
attitudes, quantities, therefore,
understandings, their
knowledge,
frequent usage cause them to leak back into the environment in similarly
and behavior related to the environment. Companies capable of realising environmental incentives massive quantities. There
are manyconsumers
motivate products to that are biologically
purchase green products, active,anddescribed
also aid by the preservative
global trend of nature and bio-
environmental
accumulation
protection [11].potential. This means a hazard to the ecosystem and human health. Highly pollutant
materials important
A reason for social from an environmental
concern concern perspective
in environmental awarenessare is UV-shields,
the depletion some of preservatives
mineral and
(parabene, triklosane),
petrochemical resources, andwhich
plastics [34].used as reasoning to create a more circular (closed material
is also
In recent
and energy years,
cycle) industrial
economy process-sourced
[32]. In this process, waste
the quantity
role of Life hasCycle
been increasing
Assessment steadily.
(LCA) is Multiple
highly
industries produce a variety of disposable by-products, which are
important, since it deals with the analysis of effects products have on the environment, takingrich in valuable mixtures. Their
the
description and valorisation
entire production chain, and can not only shape
the product’s wholethem into highly
shelf-life valuable
into account [33].products for the different
areasCosmetic
of bio-technology
and personal like body
cosmeticscare and pharmaceuticals,
products are widely used but also decrease
in massive their effect
quantities, on the
therefore,
environment, and related treatment costs. Cosmetic active ingredients
their frequent usage cause them to leak back into the environment in similarly massive quantities.extracted from fish, meat, and
dairy products
There are manyalso have multiple
products that areexamples.
biologically Suchactive,
are thedescribed
mixtures by andpreservative
extracts fromnature the waste
and
produced by agricultural or foodstuffs production. Such products
bio-accumulation potential. This means a hazard to the ecosystem and human health. Highly pollutant are efficient, cheap, and
sustainable, thereby offering an alternative to plant-sourced extracts’ frequent supply. Furthermore,
if waste products are sourced from an eco-farm, they are an even more valuable source of safe extracts
Resources 2019, 8, 137 6 of 19

materials important from an environmental concern perspective are UV-shields, some preservatives
(parabene, triklosane), and plastics [34].
In recent years, industrial process-sourced waste quantity has been increasing steadily.
Multiple industries produce a variety of disposable by-products, which are rich in valuable mixtures.
Their description and valorisation can not only shape them into highly valuable products for the
different areas of bio-technology like cosmetics and pharmaceuticals, but also decrease their effect on
the environment, and related treatment costs. Cosmetic active ingredients extracted from fish, meat,
and dairy products also have multiple examples. Such are the mixtures and extracts from the waste
produced by agricultural or foodstuffs production. Such products are efficient, cheap, and sustainable,
thereby offering an alternative to plant-sourced extracts’ frequent supply. Furthermore, if waste
products are sourced from an eco-farm, they are an even more valuable source of safe extracts needed
for these cosmetics, since there are no remaining pesticides, or potentially toxicant materials [35].
Plastic waste management is still a reason for concern for most countries. In the cosmetics industry,
some define different strategic alternatives for the same problem’s management, which mostly aim at
the dedicated planning of packaging [36]. Using heat energy produced from biomass, or renewable
energy resources are also viewed as advantageous trends in the production process of cosmetics [37].

1.4. Safe Cosmetics in the European Union

The 1223/2009/EK Decree of the European Union rules that companies shall collect and evaluate
the reports on the (non-desired) disadvantageous effects of the cosmetics they sell. Apart from this,
they also have to report highly problematic non-desired effects to the local authorities. Cosmetics
Europe, representing the European cosmetics industry worked out its guideline in order to aid the
practice for treating non-desired effects, and reporting serious non-desired effects. Keeping to the
guideline makes it possible for the companies in question to show proper care and compliance with
legal requirements [38].

1.5. Responsibility of Cosmetics Producers

The health awareness of people spread from the foodstuffs industry to the cosmetics industry.
Consumers are more and more interested in natural ingredients, sustainable packaging, and other
green elements in cosmetics. The cosmetics industry’s chemists wage a difficult war against the idea
that natural ingredients are safer than their synthetic counterparts. Ingredients need to be selected
based on their safety and efficiency, regardless of them being natural or synthetic makeup materials [15].
Cosmetics companies across the globe modified their strategy to handle new challenges better,
and incorporate the different aspects of sustainability into their activities. Green marketing highlights
a new dimension of economic, social and environmental responsibility taken up by organisations [39].
Cosmetics companies aim more and more to develop their cosmetics in a lab environment, either to be
free of chemicals, or to contain as few chemicals as possible. Producers are widening their palette of
natural cosmetics to ride the trend of changing consumer attitude [40]. The science of rheology is an
efficient tool of cosmetic products, which includes green cosmetics activities, the supply of consumer
demands, and the stability of the product (Figure 2) [41]. The original factors of rheology as a powerful
tool for cosmetic product design, we have been supplemented based on our analyses. On Figure 2
we are also showing the added factors, like the product likeability (Product flavor), quality (Product
quality), and green markings on the product packaging (Green symbols).
This constitutes product symbols which may affect consumer decisions, since a dedicated green
consumer will search for these symbols on the packaging. For the green consumer, likeability of the
product and the price to performance ratio, and quality are important points to note during consumer
decision-making. If the consumer doesn’t like the product in question, they won’t use the product,
however, if there’s a gap between the desired and actual product attributes, desired quality cannot be
met, in which case the purchase becomes a negative experience for the consumer.
1.5. Responsibility of Cosmetics Producers
The health awareness of people spread from the foodstuffs industry to the cosmetics industry.
Consumers are more and more interested in natural ingredients, sustainable packaging, and other
Resources
green 2019, 8, 137
elements in cosmetics. The cosmetics industry’s chemists wage a difficult war against the7idea
of 19
that natural ingredients are safer than their synthetic counterparts. Ingredients need to be selected
based on their safety and efficiency, regardless of them being natural or synthetic makeup materials
For various industries, nanotechnology serves as the novelty. Nanotechnology is both the newest
[15]. Cosmetics companies across the globe modified their strategy to handle new challenges better,
challenge and newest interest for the cosmetics industry, which they can implement in the manufacture
and incorporate the different aspects of sustainability into their activities. Green marketing highlights
of cosmetics [42]. In the case of greentech solutions, like ultrasound-treatment, organic material remains
a new dimension of economic, social and environmental responsibility taken up by organisations
are used to make the products have a high added value. In general, we can say that plant-sourced
[39]. Cosmetics companies aim more and more to develop their cosmetics in a lab environment, either
extracts can be collected in a variety of ways. Traditional methods usually employ chemical solutions.
to be free of chemicals, or to contain as few chemicals as possible. Producers are widening their palette
However, we do know that this also causes a plethora of environmental problems during waste
of natural cosmetics to ride the trend of changing consumer attitude [40]. The science of rheology is
neutralisation [43]. During recent decades, greentech production solutions were of significant interest
an efficient tool of cosmetic products, which includes green cosmetics activities, the supply of
to modern industries [44]. The more environmental-friendly extraction technology, and the increasing
consumer demands, and the stability of the product (Figure 2) [41]. The original factors of rheology
interest of consumers towards natural products caused it to become a potential alternative for the
as a powerful tool for cosmetic product design, we have been supplemented based on our analyses.
cosmetics industry [45]. Using the extraction technology, decreasing energy usage and pollution, and
On Figure 2 we are also showing the added factors, like the product likeability (Product flavor),
the quality of extracts improving also had an effect.
quality (Product quality), and green markings on the product packaging (Green symbols).

Figure 2. Rheology as powerful tool for cosmetic product design (Graphical abstract) based on
Figure 2. Rheology
Semenzato et al. [41].as powerful tool for cosmetic product design (Graphical abstract) based on
Semenzato et al. [41].
The zero waste concept inspired the environmentally friendly oil extraction of both natural volatile,
and non-volatile bioactive mixtures [46]. The main source of extracting bio-active natural ingredients
are plants, most notably herbs and spices [46]. Plant-based active ingredients usable in both traditional
pharmaceutical products and functional cosmetics for a longer period, can be applied to the current
trend of the green cosmetics market with their well-documented biological effects [41].
Cosmetics demand protection against microbes, just as all water- and organic/inorganic
mixture-containing products, to secure the safety of consumers, and increase the shelf-life of the
product [47]. The main goal of microbiological safety is the consumer’s protection against potentially
pathogenic micro-organisms, and avoiding the biological, and physical-chemical degradation of the
product. Also important are quality conservation. All of these are supported by chemical, physical,
or chemical-physical strategic actions. The most common strategic action is using anti-microbe
ingredients. The current validation of the preservative system follows the good manufacture practices,
by evaluating the resource and conservation effect using the proper methods [48,49]. UV filters are used
in a wide spectrum in cosmetics in order to protect human skin, or the product against the detrimental
effects of UV rays. The increasing usage of UV-shields, and their improper placement and storage
cause them to be a newfound group among the newly forming pollutants currently in production [50].

1.6. Green Aspects of Consumer Behavior Related to Cosmetics Purchase

Consumer behavior underwent a significant change in recent decades, environmental and health
awareness obtained a significant role. Consumers also think about future generations, and they
consider protecting the state of the environment more and more during their decisions [40]. The trend
of using cosmetics gained momentum all around the Globe, however, the actual quantity used is not
Resources 2019, 8, 137 8 of 19

determined by any actual statistical data. However, lack of civilian awareness related to cosmetics
usage causes a significant healthcare risk, especially in developing countries [51]. According to the
theory of planned behavior (TPB), behavioral intention has three factors: Attitudes towards a behavior,
subjective norms, and perceived behavior control (PCB) [52].
In 2018, the Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association (CTPA) summarized that consumer
attitudes “use” product attributes, including functions, ingredients, packaging, fragrance materials,
and even price, to influence purchase behavior [15]. Green purchase attitudes suggest that the
performance of green purchase behavior can be evaluated either positively or negatively. Chan pointed
out that environmental awareness and price sensitivity significantly mirrors the level of green purchase
attitudes [53]. Knowledge can influence the entire decision-making process of consumers. Knowing
green products often comes right before green purchase intent. Green trust and green purchase intent
have a connection, positively influenced by perceived price. Higher perceived price results in higher
trust from the consumer in the case of green products, therefore, has a higher effect on purchase intent
as well [54].
In recent decades, environmental protection and green marketing trends resulted in the change of
consumer demand and behavior. Consumers are more and more interested in an environmentally
friendly lifestyle, since they not only consider environment protection perspectives, but also want
personal advantages from green products. We can see green initiatives on various areas, such as green
energy usage during production and manufacture, or the appearance of environmentally friendly, zero
waste packaging [55].
Aware consumption prefers natural, and biologically degrading packaging instead of plastic
packaging, which in the capacity of their nature as waste, cause environmental damages and load.
The cosmetics industry is searching for sustainable solutions in order to increase bio-efficiency and keep
the circular economy basics. Their research mainly focuses on naturally and biologically degrading
polymers [56]. Increasing environmental awareness in society serves as an incentive for consumers to
use green cosmetic products. The fastest growing industry on the global market is the market of green
skincare products, as opposed to other green cosmetic products [11].
Consumers love to personalize their cosmetic products, this has become a widespread tendency.
They wish to select the ingredients within the products according to the specific needs of their own
skin or hair, since they consider personalized products more efficient than the products found on the
store shelves [57]. Based on the literature sources, we can assume that the palette of green cosmetics
(ingredients, active ingredients, packaging, and technological solutions) is expanding continuously
due to research. Legal regulation can also serve as guarantee for safety, and environmental protection
is becoming more apparent within the cosmetics industry. Therefore, the main goal of our quantitative
research is to introduce the main factors influencing the purchase of green cosmetics, and to determine
the current consumer clusters of green cosmetic purchasers in Hungary. Based on the scientific
problems and research ideas and goals, the following research questions were formed:

- Are women more prone to buy natural cosmetics than men? Are consumers preferring natural
cosmetics more open for newer, more modern natural cosmetics brands during their purchases?
- Are health- and environmentally aware consumers more motivated to buy natural cosmetics in
general, compared to the less aware consumers? Are consumers who buy bio-foodstuffs more
prone to buy natural cosmetics as well?

2. Material and Methods

The questions used in the quantitative analyses were formed by supplementing four questions
of the question groups used by Matić and Puh [1] and slight re-wording. Based on their research,
the four question groups were the purchase of natural cosmetics, the conditions of buying new natural
cosmetics, leading a healthy lifestyle, and consuming bio-foodstuffs as a general eating habit, aiming to
offer a positive supplement. Based on the conclusions drawn from the processed literature, in our
analyses, the question was modified to assume refusal of purchasing bio-foodstuffs. The questionnaire
Resources 2019, 8, 137 9 of 19

was further extended by information on leading an environmentally friendly lifestyle, and we also
evaluated the intent to pay extra for a cosmetic product which contains natural ingredients, or the
packaging of which was made using natural material. Our intention with the question on refusal of
purchasing natural cosmetics was to find out if the purchase intent remains when the product is not
as effective as its synthetic counterpart. During the wording of questions, our goal was to make it
possible to differentiate between motivation aimed at buying natural or synthetic cosmetics.

2.1. Research Material

The data was collected using an online questionnaire in Hungary, which was filled out by a total of
197 participants. We used the resulting purchase pattern in our analyses. The empirical data collection
was conducted between 20 April 2018 and 14 May 2018. The questionnaire consisted of two major
parts. The first part was a series of seven questions employing the Likert-scale, where participants were
asked to define how much they approve of the statements (1—absolutely disapprove, 5—absolutely
approve) about their purchase intent towards natural cosmetics, and the statement given (“I wish to
buy natural cosmetics.”), furthermore, using Yes/No answers. The second part of the questionnaire
was a basic collection of the participants’ demographic variables (like age and gender).
The questionnaire was filled out by 197 participants, and there are four missing answers. One is
missing from the willingness to purchase natural cosmetics, one from environmental awareness,
one from packaging, and one from the decision between normal and natural cosmetics. Average values
are higher for all variables than the deviation values.
The questionnaire mainly consists of Likert-scales, which means median, minimum, and maximum
values were all according to the values of the five level Likert-scale (1–5), and the values based on
the choice between two options (1–0, 1–2) (Table 1). Answers between one and three are negative,
are basically ‘no’, whereas are positive for four and five, basically ‘yes’. Neutral answers were not
included in obvious positive answers, they were rather included in the negative answers, because the
answer wasn’t completely sure.

Table 1. Results of descriptive statistics.

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

New brands 197 1.0 5.0 3.5 1.4
Healthy way of life 197 1.0 5.0 4.1 1.0
No biofood’ buying 197 1.0 5.0 2.1 1.2
Environmentally conscious consumer behaviour 196 2.0 5.0 4.3 0.7
Natural ingredients 197 1.0 5.0 4.0 1.1
Natural packaging 196 1.0 5.0 3.9 1.2
Less effective natural cosmetics 196 1.0 5.0 2.4 1.4
Valid N (listwise) 194

The sampling was done online, the questionnaire was shared using social media via the snowball
method. The questionnaire itself could be filled out using the http://ripet.hu online questionnaire site
(Appendix B).

2.2. Methods
As primary research, we chose to conduct descriptive statistical analyses and cluster analyses using
the PASW Statistics 18 programme. First, descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. As part
of the cluster analysis, first, a hierarchic analysis method was chosen (Ward’s Cluster), after which a
non-hierarchic method (K-means) was used.
(Note: A large number of clustering methods have been proposed for customer segmentation,
including hierarchical approaches as well as non-hierarchical approaches. The most popular
algorithm of non-hierarchical clustering methods is the K-means algorithm. The K-means algorithm
Resources 2019, 8, 137 10 of 19

must pre-specify the number of clusters (K), which is not required for hierarchical algorithms.
A non-hierarchical approach would be required to achieve our study goals, but since one of the
important conclusions of the research presented by Matić and Puh [1] was that knowledge of the
product and its impact is important when making choices, we wanted to see that can be grouped into
hierarchical groups. As a result, hierarchical clustering provides an intuitive way to study relationships
among clusters not possible using non-hierarchical approaches. Non-hierarchical clustering methods
are usually used for larger datasets like the one we had. Based on our hierarchical and non-hierarchic
results, we obtained the same clusters, so no further investigations were warranted.)
The results of the analysis were further evaluated using analytical tools, including the methods
of analysis and synthesis, inductive and deductive approach method, and the generalisation and
specialisation methods. Table 1 clearly shows the 197 participants in the sample, who were willing to
fill out the questionnaire, hence, they make up the Hungarian consumer sample of 34% men and 66%
women. According to age groups, 17% of participants came from the 18–23, 28% from the 25–34, 23%
of the 35–44, 22% of the 45–54, and 11% of the 55 above group (Appendix A).

3. Results

3.1. Outcome of Descriptive Statistics Analyses

Research results show that 70% of the participants wish to buy natural cosmetics. 56% of them
(completely approve and approve categories) wish to buy brands which are newcomers on the
cosmetics market. 78% of the participants (completely approve, approve) tend towards following a
healthy lifestyle, whereas 68% of participants (completely approve, approve) tend towards buying
bio-foodstuffs. 86% of participants (completely approve, approve) are influenced in their decisions by
environmental awareness. 70% of the participants are willing to pay extra for a natural cosmetic made
of natural ingredients. 68% of participants are similarly willing to pay extra for a cosmetic in packaging
made of natural material (completely approve, approve). In terms of a given cosmetic’s effectiveness,
57% of participants (completely approve, approve) choose a less effective natural cosmetic instead of a
normal cosmetic (Appendix A).
We defined the difference between two participants using the Euclidean distance squared.
Data which was further analysed were highlighted using grey in Appendix A and Table 1.

3.2. Ward’s Cluster Analysis (Hierarchical Analysis)

Variables analysed in the research were: Openness towards new cosmetic brands, health awareness,
avoidance of buying bio-foodstuffs, environmental awareness, natural ingredients, natural packaging,
and preference towards natural cosmetics opposed to more effective chemical cosmetics despite
less effectiveness.
Based on the summary of cases and averages, openness, health awareness, environmental
awareness, and natural ingredients and packaging are in Cluster 1. Bio-foodstuffs and buying less
effective natural cosmetics were included into Cluster 2 (Table 2).
According to the analysed variables (Table 3), three clusters were outlined. Cluster 1 included
(based on the percentage values—above 30%) the purchase of less effective natural cosmetics. Cluster 2
included openness, health awareness, bio-foodstuffs, natural ingredients and packaging, and purchase
of less effective natural cosmetics. Cluster 3 included openness, bio-foodstuffs, and the purchase of
less effective natural cosmetics. Apart from belonging in the various clusters, the value of final results
can also help us make a decision, which means, a difference above 30% is the decisive factor. Cluster 2
includes health awareness and natural ingredients and packaging. Cluster 3 is represented by the
openness towards new natural cosmetic brands, bio-foodstuffs, and refusal of purchasing less effective
natural cosmetics. Health awareness can’t be organized into either cluster.
Resources 2019, 8, 137 11 of 19

Table 2. A summary of Ward’s Cluster analysis.

Case Summaries
Ward Method
1 2 3 Total
Mean 4.940 2.089 3.183 3.536
New brands
Std. Deviation 0.238 0.733 1.198 1.404
Mean 4.955 3.000 3.915 4.062
Healthy way of life
Std. Deviation 0.208 0.977 0.670 0.985
Mean 1.045 2.867 2.476 2.072
No biofood’ buying
Std. Deviation 0.208 1.099 1.135 1.189
Mean 5.000 3.444 4.231 4.314
Environmentally conscious consumer behaviour
Std. Deviation 0.000 0.624 0.551 0.747
Mean 5.000 2.422 3.939 3.954
Natural ingredients
Std. Deviation 0.000 0.941 0.673 1.149
Mean 4.970 2.333 3.805 3.866
Natural packaging
Std. Deviation 0.171 0.879 0.710 1.171
Mean 1.090 3.556 2.817 2.392
Less effective natural cosmetics
Std. Deviation 0.379 1.078 1.167 1.366

Table 3. Deviation/average of variables.

Clusters
Variables
1 2 3
New brands 4.83% 35.09% 37.64%
Healthy way of life 4.21% 32.57% 17.13%
No biofood’ buying 19.94% 38.36% 45.87%
Environmentally conscious consumer behaviour 0.00% 18.11% 13.02%
Natural ingredients 0.00% 38.86% 17.09%
Natural packaging 3.45% 37.67% 18.67%
Less effective natural cosmetics 34.75% 30.31% 41.41%

3.3. K-Means Cluster Analysis (Non-Hierarchic Method)

The tri-cluster result is a group close to the main average, Cluster 1 included 71 people, Cluster 2
included 54 people, whereas Cluster 3 included 69 people (Table 4).

Table 4. Number of Cases in each Cluster.

Number of Cases in Each Cluster

1 71.0
Cluster 2 54.0
3 69.0
Valid 194.0
Missing 3.0

We can iterate as long as the cluster centres show no more changes (final cluster centres). The three
clusters include the main purchase variables (motivation factors) (Table 5).
Resources 2019, 8, 137 12 of 19

Table 5. The three clusters and Z score variables.

Resources 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 19
Final Cluster Centers

Table 5. The three clusters and Z score variables. Cluster

Zsore Variables
1 2 3
Final Cluster Centers
Zscore: New brands 0.956 −1.092 −0.153
Cluster
Zsore Variables −1.063
Zscore: Healthy way of life 0.862 1 2 3−0.067
Zscore: Zscore:
No biofood’
Newbuying
brands −0.851
0.956 0.662
−1.092 0.372
−0.153
Zscore:conscious
Zscore: Environmentally Healthy way of life
consumer behavior 0.862
0.898 −1.063
0.996 −0.067
−0.152
Zscore:
Zscore: No biofood'
Natural buying
ingredients −0.851
0.905 0.662
−1.215 0.372
−0.007
Zscore: Environmentally conscious
Zscore: Natural packaging consumer behavior 0.898
0.918 0.996
−1.191 −0.152
−0.027
Zscore: Natural ingredients 0.905 −1.215 −0.007
Zscore: Less effective natural cosmetics −0.884 0.943 0.201
Zscore: Natural packaging 0.918 −1.191 −0.027
Zscore: Less effective natural cosmetics −0.884 0.943 0.201
Figure 3 also supports the tri-cluster solution, which were tagged using three colors. Cluster 1
Figureincluded
therefore 3 also supports
openness,the tri-cluster solution, which
health awareness, were tagged
environment using three
awareness, colors.
natural Cluster 1
ingredients,
therefore included openness, health awareness, environment awareness, natural
and packaging. Cluster 2 included bio-foodstuffs and purchase of less effective natural cosmetics. ingredients, and
packaging. Clusterbio-foodstuffs
Cluster 3 included 2 included bio-foodstuffs
and purchase and purchase
of less of less
effective effective
natural natural
cosmetics as cosmetics.
well. BeingCluster
sorted
3into
included
Clustersbio-foodstuffs and purchase
2 or 3 was based of less
on the Z score effective
value, naturaltocosmetics
according as well.
which, refusal Being sorted into
of bio-foodstuff and
Clusters 2 or 3 was based on the Z score value, according to which, refusal of bio-foodstuff
less effective natural cosmetic purchase means inclusion in Cluster 2, whereas Cluster 3 becomes and less
a
effective natural
hybrid cluster cosmetic
with similarpurchase
initiativemeans inclusion
to Cluster in Cluster
2, however, much2, whereas Cluster
less apparent in 3intent.
becomes a hybrid
cluster with similar initiative to Cluster 2, however, much less apparent in intent.

Figure 3. Final Cluster Centers with cluster groups.

Cluster 11 can
Cluster can be
be defined
defined by
by preferring
preferring new
new brands,
brands, health
health and
and environmental
environmental awareness,
awareness, andand
desiring natural ingredients and packaging. Cluster 2 can be defined by avoiding the
desiring natural ingredients and packaging. Cluster 2 can be defined by avoiding the purchase of bio-purchase of
bio-foodstuffs, and preferring chemical cosmetics instead of natural cosmetics. Cluster 3 can
foodstuffs, and preferring chemical cosmetics instead of natural cosmetics. Cluster 3 can be defined be defined
by aa less
by less apparent
apparent avoidance
avoidance of
of bio-foodstuffs
bio-foodstuffs purchase
purchase andand natural
natural cosmetics,
cosmetics, and
and aa slight
slight openness
openness
towards natural products. Cluster 1 could be called the NATURAL group, Cluster
towards natural products. Cluster 1 could be called the NATURAL group, Cluster 2 would be 2 would be the
the
NON-NATURAL group, whereas Cluster 3 should be named
NON-NATURAL group, whereas Cluster 3 should be named the MIXED group. the MIXED group.
As we
As we already
already discussed
discussed in
in the
the methodology part, Matić
methodology part, Matić and
and Puh
Puh already
already conducted
conducted aa similar
similar
analysis for the Croatian consumers, and their results show a similar conclusion
analysis for the Croatian consumers, and their results show a similar conclusion to to ours. Therefore,
ours. Therefore,
the analyses
the analyses using
usingdifferent
differentmethods
methodssupport
supportthe the results
results of of
eacheach other,
other, on the
on the other
other hand,hand, incase
in the the
of bio-food consumption versus natural preference, we have the opposite result. For those who prefer
natural cosmetics, more people do not consume bio-foods than those who prefer them. The results of
the research should be taken into account in the marketing of organic products, because the
consumption of bio-food and the trend of the preference of natural cosmetics are very different.
Resources 2019, 8, 137 13 of 19

case of bio-food consumption versus natural preference, we have the opposite result. For those who
prefer natural cosmetics, more people do not consume bio-foods than those who prefer them. The
results of the research should be taken into account in the marketing of organic products, because the
consumption of bio-food and the trend of the preference of natural cosmetics are very different.

4. Discussion
Based on the research conducted, the results showed that three clusters can be formed, based
on the consumer behavior on the cosmetics market. One of these is completely green, meaning aims
at purchasing natural cosmetics, another one prefers chemical cosmetics, whereas a third cluster is
mixed, in which both natural and chemical cosmetics are purchased. These clusters show consumer
opinion differences, probably caused by a multitude of factors. There are consumers who buy natural
cosmetics, even if those are more expensive than chemical cosmetics, since they consider conserving
both their own health and the environment an important factor. Other consumers believe in the
traditional, long-time guaranteed brands, but among them are those that are more open for both
new products and new brands. The consumer behavior towards cosmetics can be approached in a
variety of ways. Based on the results of the primary research, women are more open towards buying
cosmetics and natural cosmetics and men, but this is not necessarily in relation to the purchase of
bio-foodstuffs. Not all participants found it evident that buying bio-foodstuffs should cause them to
prefer natural cosmetics. Consumers won’t use natural cosmetics, if they’re not as effective as their
chemical counterparts. Environmental and health awareness, and preference for natural cosmetics also
don’t necessarily produce an associative link. Furthermore, different age groups also don’t find the
importance of natural cosmetics to be the same. Health and environment-aware consumers are more
motivated to buy natural cosmetics, but will still choose the intensity of purchase in light of knowledge
and information at hand.
Based on the analyses, there are a large variety of preferences when buying natural cosmetics,
and to each consumer, different factors may be the defining ones in their final decisions. However, in
spite of this, we were able to form three definitive groups using a cluster analysis. These groups have
their own main specifics, and factors for consumer decision. Consumer decisions’ further analysis
should be extended to areas where personal and social/environmental preferences are also taken into
consideration for consumer decisions. The apparent and missing knowledge’s effect in cosmetics usage
should also be analysed in the various target groups and age groups.
Limitations: The validity of research results should only be considered with limitations. The
analysis is based on a Hungarian survey, it is advisable to extend the investigations to a larger territorial
unit, and to examine them under other income conditions as well. Accurate knowledge of product
features, credible information to consumers, and deliberate education of consumers play an important
role in decision-making. It is advisable to examine the extent to which education backgrounds,
knowledge of a healthy lifestyle, and knowledge of the harmful effects change the consumption habits
of each product category. Furthermore, the mechanism of interaction between the products is unknown,
which was not investigated in this study. Based on the results of this study, it is not advisable to change
the regulatory system or tax conditions.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, C.F.; methodology and formal analysis, N.A.; original draft preparation,
N.A.; writing—review and editing with supervision, C.F.
Funding: Preparation the manuscript and our final article was supported by the Climate Change Research Centre
and Doctoral School of Management and Business Administration at Szent Istvan University.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Resources 2019, 8, 137 14 of 19

Appendix A. Sample of the Analysis

Table A1. Sample attributes.

No. of Answers
Variables (Questions in the Questionnaire) Categories
Number %
Yes 137 70%
1. I wish to buy natural cosmetics. No 59 30%
Total 196 100%
Completely disapprove. 22 11%
Disapprove. 30 15%
2. I tend to buy new natural cosmetic brands. Neutral/no opinion. 35 18%
Approve. 38 19%
Completely approve. 72 37%
Total 197 100%
Completely disapprove. 3 2%
Disapprove. 15 8%
3. I have a health-aware lifestyle. Neutral/no opinion. 26 13%
Approve. 75 38%
Completely approve. 78 40%
Total 197 100%
Completely disapprove. 87 44%
Disapprove. 47 24%
4. I refuse to buy bio-foodstuffs. Neutral/no opinion. 34 17%
Approve. 21 11%
Completely approve. 8 4%
Total 197 100%
Completely disapprove. 0 0%
Disapprove. 3 2%
5. I’m an environmentally aware consumer, I try not
Neutral/no opinion. 24 12%
to pollute the environment.
Approve. 77 39%
Completely approve. 92 47%
Total 196 100%
Completely disapprove. 6 3%
Disapprove. 22 11%
6. I’m willing to pay extra for cosmetics made out of
Neutral/no opinion. 30 15%
natural ingredients.
Approve. 54 27%
Completely approve. 85 43%
Total 197 100%
Resources 2019, 8, 137 15 of 19

Table A1. Cont.

No. of Answers
Variables (Questions in the Questionnaire) Categories
Number %
Completely disapprove. 8 4%
Disapprove. 22 11%
7. I’m willing to pay extra for cosmetics in natural
Neutral/no opinion. 33 17%
packaging.
Approve. 57 29%
Completely approve. 76 39%
Total 196 100%
Completely disapprove. 77 39%
Disapprove. 36 18%
8. I don’t buy natural cosmetics less effective than Neutral/no opinion. 29 15%
chemical ones.
Approve. 40 20%
Resources 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW Completely approve. 14 7%15 of 19
Total 196 100%
No. of Answers
Variables (questions in the questionnaire) Categories
Male 67 34%
Number %
9. Sex FemaleMale 130 67 66%34%
9. Sex TotalFemale 197 130 100%66%
18-24Total 33 197 17%100%
25-3418-24 55 33 28%17%
10. Age 35-44
25-34 45
55 23%28%
35-44 45 23%
10. Age 45-54 43 22%
45-54 43 22%
55- 21 11%
55- 21 11%
Total Total 197 197 100% 100%

Appendix
AppendixB.
B.Questionnaire
Questionnairefor
forOnline
OnlineData
DataCollection
Collection

Statistics by question
1. I wish to by
Statistics question
buy natural cosmetics—[196]
1. I wish to buy natural cosmetics—[196]
No. 100%
No. 100%
Yes
Yes 137 137 70% 70%
No
No 59 59 30% 30%
2. I tend to buy new natural cosmetic brands. (1, Completelycompletely
2. I tend to buy new natural cosmetic brands. (1, Completely disapprove, 5, approve)—[197]
disapprove, 5, completely
No. 100%
approve)—[197]
1. Completely disapprove. 22 11%
2. Disapprove. 30 No. 100% 15%
1.
3. Completely disapprove.
Neutral/no opinion. 35 22 11% 18%
4. Disapprove.
2. Approve. 38 30 15% 19%
5. Completely approve. 72 37%
3.
3. Neutral/no opinion.lifestyle. (1, Completely disapprove,
I lead a health-aware 35 18%
5, completely approve)—[197]
4. Approve. No. 38 19% 100%
1. Completely disapprove.
5. Completely approve. 3 72 37% 2%
2. Disapprove. 15 8%
3. I lead a health-aware lifestyle. (1, Completely disapprove, 5, completely approve)—
[197]
No. 100%
1. Completely disapprove. 3 2%
2. Disapprove. 15 8%
Resources 2019, 8, 137 16 of 19

3. Neutral/no opinion. 26 13%

4. Approve. 75 38%
5. Completely approve. 78 40%
4. I refuse to buy bio-foodstuffs. (1, Completely disapprove, 5, completely approve)—[197]
No. 100%
1. Completely disapprove. 87 44%
2. Disapprove. 47 24%
3. Neutral/no opinion. 34 17%
4. Approve. 21 11%
5. Completely approve. 8 4%
5. I’m an environmentally aware consumer, I try not to pollute the environment (1, Completely disapprove, 5,
completely approve)—[196]
No. 100%
1. Completely disapprove. 0 0%
2. Disapprove. 3 2%
3. Neutral/no opinion. 24 12%
4. Approve. 77 39%
5. Completely approve. 92 47%
6. I’m willing to pay extra for cosmetics made out of natural ingredients. (1, Completely disapprove, 5,
completely approve)—[197]
No. 100%
1. Completely disapprove. 6 3%
2. Disapprove. 22 11%
3. Neutral/no opinion. 30 15%
4. Approve. 54 27%
5. Completely approve. 85 43%
7. I’m willing to pay extra for cosmetics in natural packaging. (1, Completely disapprove, 5, completely
approve)—[196]
No. 100%
1. Completely disapprove. 8 4%
2. Disapprove. 22 11%
3. Neutral/no opinion. 33 17%
4. Approve. 57 29%
5. Completely approve. 76 39%
8. I don’t buy natural cosmetics less effective than chemical ones. (1, Completely disapprove, 5, completely
approve)—[196]
No. 100%
1. Completely disapprove. 77 39%
2. Disapprove. 36 18%
3. Neutral/no opinion. 29 15%
4. Approve. 40 20%
5. Completely approve. 14 7%
9. Sex—[197]
No. 100%
Male 67 34%
Female 130 66%
10. Age—[197]
No. 100%
18–24 33 17%
25–34 55 28%
35–44 45 23%
45–54 43 22%
55– 21 11%
Resources 2019, 8, 137 17 of 19

References
1. Matić, M.; Puh, B. Consumers’ purchase intentions towards natural cosmetics. Econviews (Ekonomski Vjesnik)
2016, 29, 53–64.
2. Vollmer, D.L.; West, W.A.; Lephart, E.D. Enhancing Skin Health: By Oral Administration of Natural
Compounds and Minerals with Implications to the Dermal Microbiome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3059.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Chaudri, S.K.; Jain, N.K. History of Cosmetics. Asian J. Pharm. 2009, 7–9, 164–167.
4. Cosmetics, Perfume, & Hygiene in Ancient Egypt. Available online: https://www.ancient.eu/article/1061/
cosmetics-perfume--hygiene-in-ancient-egypt/ (accessed on 4 May 2017).
5. Vaishali, S.K.; Ashwini, G.C.; Kshitija, P.D.; Digambar, N.N. Cosmeceuticals an Emerging Concept:
A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Chem. 2013, 3, 308–309.
6. Gubitosa, J.; Rizzi, V.; Fini, P.; Cosma, P. Hair Care Cosmetics: From Traditional Shampoo to Solid Clay and
Herbal Shampoo—A Review. Cosmetics 2019, 6, 13. [CrossRef]
7. The Chemistry of Cosmetics. Available online: https://www.science.org.au/curious/people-medicine/
chemistry-cosmetics (accessed on 23 June 2019).
8. Amberg, N.; Magda, R. Environmental Pollution and Sustainability or the Impact of the Environmentally
Conscious Measures of International Cosmetic Companies on Purchasing Organic Cosmetics. Visegrad J.
Bioecon. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 1, 23. [CrossRef]
9. González-Minero, J.; Bravo-Díaz, L. The Use of Plants in Skin-Care Products, Cosmetics and Fragrances:
Past and Present. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 50. [CrossRef]
10. Zappelli, C.; Barbulova, A.; Apone, F.; Colucci, G. Effective Active Ingredients Obtained through
Biotechnology. Cosmetics 2016, 3, 39. [CrossRef]
11. Chin, J.; Jiang, B.C.; Mufidah, I.; Persada, S.F.; Noer, B.A. The Investigation of Consumers’ Behavior Intention
in Using Green Skincare Products: A Pro-Environmental Behavior Model Approach. Sustainability 2018,
10, 3922. [CrossRef]
12. The Benefits of an Environmentally Friendly Business. Available online: https://www.business.qld.gov.au/
running-business/environment/environment-business/benefits (accessed on 1 September 2014).
13. Green Cosmetics: The Push for Sustainable Beauty. Available online: https://www.acme-hardesty.com/green-
cosmetics-sustainable-beauty/ (accessed on 23 June 2019).
14. McIntosh, K.; Smith, A.; Young, L.K.; Leitch, M.A.; Tiwari, A.K.; Reddy, C.M.; O’Neil, G.W.; Liberatore, M.W.;
Chandler, M.; Baki, G. Alkenones as a Promising Green Alternative for Waxes in Cosmetics and Personal
Care Products. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 34. [CrossRef]
15. Lin, Y.; Yang, S.; Hanifah, H.; Iqbal, Q. An Exploratory Study of Consumer Attitudes toward Green Cosmetics
in the UK Market. Adm. Sci. 2018, 8, 71. [CrossRef]
16. Fedoung, E.F.; Zra, T.; Biyegue, C.F.N.; Bissoue, A.N.; Baraye, S.; Tsabang, N. Herbal Cosmetics Knowledge
of Arab-Choa and Kotoko Ethnic Groups in the Semi-Arid Areas of Far North Cameroon: Ethnobotanical
Assessment and Phytochemical Review. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 31. [CrossRef]
17. Bello-Bravo, J.; Lovett, P.N.; Pittendrigh, B.R. The Evolution of Shea Butter’s “Paradox of paradoxa” and the
Potential Opportunity for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to Improve Quality, Market
Access and Women’s Livelihoods across Rural Africa. Sustainability 2015, 7, 5752–5772. [CrossRef]
18. Pereira, L. Seaweeds as Source of Bioactive Substances and Skin Care Therapy—Cosmeceuticals, Algotheraphy,
and Thalassotherapy. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 68. [CrossRef]
19. Bastianini, M.; Faffa, C.; Sisani, M.; Petracci, A. Caffeic Acid-layered Double Hydroxide Hybrid: A New Raw
Material for Cosmetic Applications. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 51. [CrossRef]
20. Guerra, E.; Llompart, M.; Garcia-Jares, C. Analysis of Dyes in Cosmetics: Challenges and Recent
Developments. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 47. [CrossRef]
21. Cosmetics Market by Category (Skin & Sun Care Products, Hair Care Products, Deodorants, Makeup &
Color Cosmetics, Fragrances) and by Distribution Channel (General Departmental Store, Supermarkets,
Drug Stores, Brand Outlets)—Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2014–2022. Available
online: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/cosmetics-market (accessed on 31 July 2016).
22. General Introduction to the Chemistry of Dyes. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK385442/ (accessed on 12 December 2010).
Resources 2019, 8, 137 18 of 19

23. Corsini, E.; Galbiati, V. Contact Allergy to Fragrances: In Vitro Opportunities for Safety Assessment. Cosmetics
2019, 6, 3. [CrossRef]
24. Basketter, D.; Corsini, E. Can We Make Cosmetic Contact Allergy History? Cosmetics 2016, 3, 11. [CrossRef]
25. Fung, E.S.; Drechsel, D.A.; Towle, K.M.; Hoang, M.T.; Novick, R.M.; Poteete, C.; Paustenbach, D.J.;
Monnot, A.D. Screening-Level Safety Assessment of Personal Care Product Constituents Using Publicly
Available Data. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 38. [CrossRef]
26. Campa, M.; Baron, E. Anti-aging Effects of Select Botanicals: Scientific Evidence and Current Trends.
Cosmetics 2018, 5, 54. [CrossRef]
27. Lin, R.-D.; Chen, M.-C.; Liu, Y.-L.; Lin, Y.-T.; Lu, M.-K.; Hsu, F.-L.; Lee, M.-H. New Whitening Constituents
from Taiwan-Native Pyracantha koidzumii: Structures and Tyrosinase Inhibitory Analysis in Human
Epidermal Melanocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 28598–28613. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Smit, N.; Vicanova, J.; Pavel, S. The Hunt for Natural Skin Whitening Agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009,
10, 5326–5349. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Kumar, N.; Tyagi, R. Dimeric Surfactants: Promising Ingredients of Cosmetics and Toiletries. Cosmetics 2014,
1, 3–13. [CrossRef]
30. Sustainability Continues to gain Momentum among Southeast Asian Consumers. Available
online: https://www.nielsen.com/id/en/press-room/2015/SUSTAINABILITY-CONTINUES-TO-GAIN-
MOMENTUM-AMONG-SOUTHEAST-ASIAN-CONSUMERS.html (accessed on 22 October 2015).
31. Olson, E.G. Creating an enterprise-level “green” strategy. J. Bus. Strategy 2008, 29, 22–30. [CrossRef]
32. Huppertz, T.; Weidema, B.P.; Standaert, S.; De Caevel, B.; Van Overbeke, E. The Social Cost of Sub-soil
Resource Use. Resources 2019, 8, 19. [CrossRef]
33. Janowicz, K.; Krisnadhi, A.A.; Hu, Y.; Suh, S.; Cheatham, M.; Weidema, B.P.; Rivela, B.; Tivander, J.; Meyer, D.E.;
Berg-Cross, G.; et al. A Minimal Ontology Pattern for Life Cycle Assessment Data. In Proceedings
of the 6th Workshop on Ontology and Semantic Web Patterns (WOP2015) Co-located with the 14th
International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2015), Bethlehem, PA, USA, 11 October 2015; Available online:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281685710 (accessed on 29 July 2019).
34. Juliano, C.; Magrini, G.A. Cosmetic Ingredients as Emerging Pollutants of Environmental and Health Concern.
A Mini-Review. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 11. [CrossRef]
35. Barbulova, A.; Colucci, G.; Apone, F. New Trends in Cosmetics: By-Products of Plant Origin and Their
Potential Use as Cosmetic Active Ingredients. Cosmetics 2015, 2, 82–92. [CrossRef]
36. Horvath, B.; Mallinguh, E.; Fogarassy, C. Designing Business Solutions for Plastic Waste Management to
Enhance Circular Transitions in Kenya. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1664. [CrossRef]
37. Bacskai, I.; Madar, V.; Fogarassy, C.; Toth, L. Modeling of Some Operating Parameters Required for the
Development of Fixed Bed Small Scale Pyrolysis Plant. Resources 2019, 8, 79. [CrossRef]
38. Renner, G.; Audebert, F.; Burfeindt, J.; Calvet, B.; Caratas-Perifan, N.; Leal, M.E.; Gorni, R.; Long, A.;
Meredith, E.; O’Sullivan, Ú.; et al. Cosmetics Europe Guidelines on the Management of Undesirable Effects
and Reporting of Serious Undesirable Effects from Cosmetics in the European Union. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 1.
[CrossRef]
39. Kardos, M.; Gabor, M.R.; Christache, N. Green Marketing’s Roles in Sustainability and Ecopreneurship.
Case Study: Green Packaging’s Impact on Romanian Young Consumers’ Environmental Responsibility.
Sustainability 2019, 11, 873. [CrossRef]
40. Amberg, N. Sustainability Backround of Producing and Selecting Cosmetics, with Special Precautions for Product
Instruments; Zeszyty Naukowe (Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomiczno-Społecznej w Ostroł˛ece): Ostroleka, Poland,
2018; Volume 4, p. 403. ISBN 2391-9167.
41. Semenzato, A.; Costantini, A.; Meloni, M.; Maramaldi, G.; Meneghin, M.; Baratto, G. Formulating O/W
Emulsions with Plant-Based Actives: A Stability Challenge for an Effective Product. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 59.
[CrossRef]
42. Barbieux, D.; Padula, A.D. Paths and Challenges of New Technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology-Based
Cosmetics Development in Brazil. Adm. Sci. 2018, 8, 16. [CrossRef]
43. Boggia, R.; Turrini, F.; Villa, C.; Lacapra, C.; Zunin, P.; Parodi, B. Green Extraction from Pomegranate Marcs
for the Production of Functional Foods and Cosmetics. Pharmaceuticals 2016, 9, 63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Resources 2019, 8, 137 19 of 19

44. Tungmunnithum, D.; Garros, L.; Drouet, S.; Renouard, S.; Lainé, E.; Hano, C. Green Ultrasound Assisted
Extraction of trans Rosmarinic Acid from Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R.Br. Leaves. Plants 2019, 8, 50.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Panda, D.; Manickam, S. Cavitation Technology—The Future of Greener Extraction Method: A Review on
the Extraction of Natural Products and Process Intensification Mechanism and Perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2019,
9, 766. [CrossRef]
46. Li, Y.; Bundeesomchok, K.; Rakotomanomana, N.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S.; Bott, R.; Wang, Y.; Chemat, F.
Towards a Zero-Waste Biorefinery Using Edible Oils as Solvents for the Green Extraction of Volatile and
Non-Volatile Bioactive Compounds form Rosemary. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 140. [CrossRef]
47. Beri, K. Perspective: Stabilizing the Microbiome Skin-Gut-Brain Axis with Natural Plant Botanical Ingredients
in Cosmetics. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 37. [CrossRef]
48. Halla, N.; Fernanes, I.P.; Heleno, S.A.; Costa, P.; Boucherit-Otmani, Z.; Boucherit, K.; Rodrigues, A.E.;
Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Barreiro, M.F. Cosmetics Preservation: A Review on Present Strategies. Molecules 2018,
23, 1571. [CrossRef]
49. Kijjoa, A.; Sawangwong, P. Drugs and Cosmetics from the Sea. Mar. Drugs 2004, 2, 73–82. [CrossRef]
50. Wang, J.; Pan, L.; Wu, S.; Lu, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Guo, M.; Zhuang, S. Recent Advances on Endocrine
Disrupting Effects of UV Filters. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 782. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Bilal, A.I.; Tilahun, Z.; Shimels, T.; Gelan, Y.B.; Osman, E.D. Cosmetics Utilization Practice in Jigjiga Town,
Eastern Ethiopia: A Community Based Cross-Sectional Study. Cosmetics 2016, 3, 40. [CrossRef]
52. Ting, C.T.; Hsieh, C.M.; Chang, H.-P.; Chen, H.-S. Environmental Consciousness and Green Customer
Behavior: The Moderating Roles of Incentive Mechanisms. Sustainability 2019, 11, 819. [CrossRef]
53. Chen, K.; Deng, T. Research on the Green Purchase Intentions from the Perspective of Product Knowledge.
Sustainability 2016, 8, 943. [CrossRef]
54. Wang, H.; Ma, B.; Bai, R. How Does Green Product Knowledge Effectively Promote Green Purchase Intention?
Sustainability 2019, 11, 1193. [CrossRef]
55. Nguyen, T.T.H.; Yang, Z.; Nguyen, N.; Johnson, L.W.; Cao, T.K. Greenwash and Green Purchase Intention:
The Mediating Role of Green Skepticism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2653. [CrossRef]
56. Cinelli, P.; Coltelli, M.B.; Signori, F.; Morganti, P.; Lazzeri, A. Cosmetic Packaging to Save the Environment:
Future Perspectives. Cosmetics 2019, 6, 26. [CrossRef]
57. Eixarch, H.; Wyness, L.; Siband, M. The Regulation of Personalized Cosmetics in the EU. Cosmetics 2019,
6, 29. [CrossRef]

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).