Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat
Every Lok Adalat constituted for an area shall consist of such number of serving or retired
judicial officers; and any other person.[xxii]
JURISDICTION:
Lok Adalat has the jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement
between the parties to a dispute in respect of any case pending before; or any matter which is
falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok
Adalat is organized.[xxiii]
Transport service,
Postal, telegraph or telephone services,
Supply of power, light and water to public,
(5) Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State
Governments.
PERMANENT LOK ADALAT’s have the same powers that are vested on the Lok-Adalats,
mentioned under Section 22(1) of the Act.
1. i) It has the power of the Civil Court, under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, while
trying a suit, in respect of the following matters:- [xxvii]
2. Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her
on oath. b) Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document.
3. c) Power to receive evidence on affidavits,
4. d) Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from
any court.
5. e) Such other matters as may be prescribed.
6. ii) Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the
determination of any dispute coming before it.[xxviii]
iii) All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the
meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC.[xxix]
1. iv) Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195
and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.[xxx]
FINALITY OF THE LOK ADALAT
AWARD
During the Lok Adalat, the parties agree to abide by the decision of the judge at the Lok
Adalat. However, it has been seen that the same order is challenged on several grounds. In
one of the recent cases, the Supreme Court of India has once again laid to rest all such doubts.
In unequivocal terms, the Court held that the award of the Lok Adalat is as good as the decree
of the Court. The award passed by the Lok Adalat is the decision of the Court itself though
arrived at by the simpler method of conciliation instead of the process of arguments in
court.[xxxi]
CONSENT OF PARTIES
The most important factor to be considered while deciding the cases at the Lok Adalat is the
consent of both the parties. It cannot be forced on any party that the matter has to be decided
by the Lok Adalat. [xxxii] However, once the parties agree that the matter has to be decided
by the Lok Adalat, then any party cannot walk away from the decision of the Lok Adalat. In
several instances, the Supreme Court has held that if there was no consent, the award of the
Lok Adalat is not executable and also if the parties fail to agree to get the dispute resolved
through Lok Adalat, the regular litigation process remains open for the contesting parties.
The Supreme Court has also held that compromise is always bilateral and means mutual
adjustment. Settlement is termination of legal proceedings by mutual consent. If no
compromise can be arrived at, then no order can be passed by the Lok Adalat.
CONCLUSION
The special conditions prevailing in the Indian society require a highly sensitized legal
service which is efficacious for the poor and the down-trodden. The Lok Adalat mechanism
is no more an experiment in the country, it is in fact, a full-proven success that needs to
increase its domain and bring under its realm the several aspects that have been excluded till
date.
The need for Lok Adalats is aggravated by the huge population of India that creates an
unmanageable burden on the Judiciary system.
To increase the efficiency of the system of Lok Adalats, it is crucial for the public, the
lawyers, the executive and the Judiciary to work in harmony and coordination. The people
should be made aware of the advantages of the Lok Adalats.
The main challenge that lies in the path of the success of Judiciary is the involvement of the
masses.
In the existing situation, the resort to Lok Adalats has enabled amicable dispute settlement.
The success of Lok Adalats should indeed be measured by the overall atmosphere generated
in the country, not by the number and nature of Lok Adalat held, cases settled or
compensation awarded.