Module 1 3july2019 (Nofooter) - Draft For Copyeditor
Module 1 3july2019 (Nofooter) - Draft For Copyeditor
Module 1 3july2019 (Nofooter) - Draft For Copyeditor
Module Overview
This module is expected to run for at least 2 weeks, covering the following key concepts:
Globalization
Nation, state and nation-state
Imagined communities
Westphalian Treaty
Colonialism
The table above from The Future of Jobs Report 2018 reveals the emerging high-demand skills of
the future as well those that are in decline in three categories: Today, 2018; Trending, 2022 and
Declining, 2022. Take a look at the skills listed in each of the categories and evaluate where our
students’ current skills belong. What do you think are the expertise and skills that students are
gaining form their respective programs and in which category do these skills belong? Do you think
the skills and expertise they gain from college will be in demand once they graduate? Will they be
bale to use these skills and expertise in your own locale or can they use these to get a job anywhere
in the world? These are questions that are crucial for you and your students to answer and explore
while you are in college. After all you would want to know if what you have learned in college
would be relevant to society once you graduate.
These questions reveal that it is crucial for colleges and universities in the Philippines to prepare
students on how to stay competitive in a constantly evolving jobs market of the future. Central to
the success of future workers is a motivation and agility to advance and adjust to the emerging
roles and skills needed by their respective workplaces and to take advantage of new opportunities
through continuous retraining and upskilling. By understanding what the contemporary world is all
about, this subject therefore aims to prepare students on what they can expect as they go out of the
classrooms and into the workplace.
A World Bank (2017) report finds that major cities in Mindanao are finding it hard to fill the skills
demand in the sectors of information technology, manufacturing, construction, and utility firms in
Mindanao. The report hints that as leading cities in the region are transforming into manufacturing
and high-skill services economies, “skills will become even more important”. Skills shortages in
Mindanao is largely attributed to inadequate support for basic education and inadequate training
programs in many parts of the region, and the migration of skilled workers. Once again, this
situation requires us to reflect on how we can better prepare our students for the needs of
Mindanao through this subject.
However, before we can further analyse the events in the contemporary world, it is important to
define the phenomenon that is continually shaping modern workplaces that will welcome our
students when they finish their college education.
SAMPLE PHOTO
Having established that globalization as a phenomenon that we need to master, we will now define
what exactly it is. This lesson will focus on the discussion of how globalization is defined on
Anthony Gidden’s (2007) proposal which describes globalization as "the intensification of
worldwide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are
shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice versa”.
You experience the process of globalization when you purchase a product from your local sari-sari
store that was manufactured in China and when you find out about the current events in New
Zealand through the internet. Consider how immigration policies of the Donal Trump can have
great impacts on the goals and actions of Filipino professionals. This is what Giddens meant when
he says globalization is when “local happenings are shaped by events occurring many miles away”.
Now, from the same definition, let us delineate further the assumptions that underpin how
globalization occurs:
a. Globalization involves the intensification of social relations worldwide.
Social relations in the form of interactions, conversations, expression of emotions, etc. is
now possible to
b. Globalization link worldwide distant localities.
c. Globalization enables for events many miles away shape to local happenings, and vice versa.
Another way that we can understand how globalization occurs is through the concept of “global
village” introduced by Marshall McLuhan. In his book, Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic
Man (1962), Mcluhan introduced the term “global village” to describe how mass communication
technologies such as newspapers, books, radio, television and movies has created a community that
spans the entire world. Today, we include the internet, cable tv and social media as electronic media
that binds the global village.
In the appendix for this lesson, you can find additional definitions of globalization from different
social scientists which you can adopt in your class. The Active Learning portion of this module also
provides an activity that students can perform in order to learn more about the definitions of
globalization.
While Starbucks opened its first branch in the Philippines back in 1997 in Makati City (Uy, 2017), it
has since then brought their “coffee experience” to other parts of the country including Cagayan de
Oro, Davao and General Santos.
Filipino historian Lisandro Claudio observed the presence/placement (?) of Starbucks branches
right across shanties and slum areas that characterize the major cities in the Philippines. Claudio
(2014) writes:
At first glance, the coexistence of the Starbucks and the shanty point to the incompleteness of
globalization in the global south. If one conceives of globalization as the spreading and consumption
of cultural/commercial signifiers, the shanty represents the tenacity of the local, which is unable to
participate in a cosmopolitan culture represented by the Starbucks. The underdevelopment of the
global south, it would seem, prevents it from being globalized, revealing the inherent unevenness of
the process.
Here in Claudio’s take on the how globalization occurs in countries like the Philippines, he points to
the “inherent unevenness of the process”. Claudio reminds us that while we, in our respective
locales, participate globalization through the foreign films we watch in the local cinemas, the H&M
or Forever 21 clothes we wear or the Starbucks coffee we drink, the impact of globalization is not
the same for everyone. However, Claudio also recognizes that the presence of global brands in
Philippine cities, such as Manila, Davao or Zamboangas, speaks of the “tenacity of the local”; that
despite the difficulties entailed in participating in globalization by ordinary citizens, Mindanaoans
including, we still try to experience this phenomenon called “globalization”.
Reflection Questions:
How about you, what other global clothing brands, global restaurants or global stores have opened
in your respective locales? And do you think New Yorkers, Manilenos and Mindanaoans experience
globalization in the same way? Why or Why not?
nations interacting with each other using a Early Communities in the Philippines
Filipino Heritage: Making of A Nation, Volume 4
common language (commonly English), and
through the platforms provided by the internet and organizations like the United Nations. In this
lesson we will identify the characteristics of a nation that enable it to interact with other nations.
But first we will narrate how nations began.
In “Globalization: Prospects and problems”, author Jo Ann Chirico (2013) proposes that nations
began from communities made up of a group of people who have something in common: they may
be sharing the land where they source their sustenance in which case they may need a common set
of values and rules necessary for interaction while sharing the land and its resources [needs
grammar revision]. As the interactions within and among these small communities increased,
their interdependence with each other grew. This enlarged their sense of community and from
this grew the concept of a nation. Community remains the basis of a nation, a people who feel they
share a common identity and belong together . The idea of nation developed gradually as the way of
identifying an “us”.
minds.
This lesson is dedicated to the story of how communities became nations, how nations became
empires and how wars that empires led to an agreement we now know as the Westphalian Treaty
of 1648. At end of this lesson, students are expected to identify the principles laid down in The
Westphalian Treaty that became the stepping stone of the modern international system. This lesson
will help students to:
1. Analyze the diffusion of the nation-state from the treaty of Westphalia to the wave of
contemporary nation-state building
2. Establish the concept of “Nationhood” in the Westphalia Treaty
In Benedict Anderson’s seminal work, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread
of Nationalism, nation is described as an “imagined political community”. For Anderson a nation is
not merely exist as the people and its government but that it also exists subjectively within people’s
minds as an image. You can also read more on Anderson’s work through the summary provided in
this link: https://www2.bc.edu/marian-simion/th406/readings/0420anderson.pdf
Largely in Europe, nations grew out of warfare. The continent experienced religious and
political wars, almost without end, from the 14th to the 17th century. By this time, the Holy
Roman Empire has weakened and disintegrated into a patchwork of princely dominions
that frequently “fought against the empire and one another for sovereignty, territory, and
freedom”. In these wars, the concept of the nation became the protector of the people that
identified themselves as belonging to the community, against the Empire and other nations.
Thus, the emergence of a national identity composed of the individual identities of the
people that professed belonging to the nation or community.
As the wars raged on, the idea of an empire (one ruler for all of humankind) became
unpopular and nationalism, the right of a group with a common identify and heritage to
govern itself, gained appeal. Nations as we know it today and the global system, such as the
United Nations or UN wherein nations allow themselves to be governed by, emerged from
the ruins of these wars. By mid-1600’s many of the European monarchs were bankrupt at
the expense of wars they waged one each other. By then, most of them had already signed
treaties with one another. In 1648, they met in the Westphalia region of Germany to broker
a peace [needs paraphrasing; Chirico, ch3] through a series of treaties now known as the
Peace of Westphalia. While the treaty was meant to end the Thirty Years’ War in Europe, it
is now widely recognized to have established the international system that recognized
sovereign states as its core. Chirico (2013) describes the consequential outcomes of the
8 MODULE 1: Introducing the Contemporary World
treaty:
“As a consequence of the Treaty (or Treaties) of Westphalia, secular political power
was stripped from religious authorities. . . Rather than the empire dictating the
official religion of a territory, monarchies gained control over religion within their
borders. France and Sweden gained disputed territories. Religious membership
became voluntary for most individuals, but state membership became mandatory.
Trade and commercial activities usurped power from religious authority and to
some extent also from the crown. Religious and political freedoms from empire
were established, not for individuals, but for nations. In short, nations gained
sovereignty.” (Chrico, 2013 page 61)
Moreover, the treaty became the basis of “an association of states, each of which claimed
sovereignty within its political boundaries and legitimacy based on the nation within”
(Chirico, 2013 p61). This is called “the Westphalia system of states”, which remains today
as the defining characteristic of the modern nation-state. The Treaty of Westphalia
established in 1648 shaped how nations behave within their territories and prescribed
how they should behave towards other nations.
While the Treaty of Westphalia did not bring lasting peace to Europe, it “established the
principle of state sovereignty and the basis of global governance” (Chirico, 2013 p62) that
is still present today. Through the treaty:
[m]onarchs granted themselves and one another the authority to speak for, make
commitments for, and sign treaties on behalf of the people they claimed to
represent. In return, they obligated themselves to care for the common good,
protecting people’s security, economy, and other interests. States granted
themselves a monopoly on the use of violence within their borders, and the right to
use violence in protection of their people. Without the power to compel people to
act, states could not make promises on the international stage.
You u can read the entire chapter entitled Setting the Stage Foundations Globalization by
JoAnn Chirico (2013) in this link: https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-
binaries/56780_Chapter_3_Chirico_Globalization.pdf.
This chapter also provides the important principles of the treaty of Westphalia which were
considered as the foundation of global governance of that period.
You can also watch a 2-part documentary feature on the Treaty of Westphalia entitled The
Thirty Years' War - how was peace achieved? In the links below:
here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ohsWMbNVN4&t=3s
Abu Bakr established the Sultanate of Sulu in 1450 (Abinales, 2006). Sulu, is the island group in the
south west of the Mindanao and northeast of Borneo, was the first sultanate and supra-barangay
state in the Philippine archipelago. Its economy was traditionally commercially oriented. More than
a hundred years before the Spaniards came, Sulu participated in expansive maritime network of
trade in southeast asia. They had expert navigators and merchants who travelled in small craft,
trading as far as Brunei and Ternate (Indonesia).
Sulu had already appeared in Chinese records beginning in 1349 having sent several tribute
missions during the early Ming dynasty. In one such mission, Paduka Pahala, who travelled to China
to pay fealty in person fell ill and died at the Chinese court in 1417. The Chinese emperor, Yongle,
arranged an elaborate funeral as "standard for a brother of the empire" (Tordesillas, 2015). This
historical incident is only one evidence of Sulu’s vibrant and strong trading and political relations
with other nations prior to the arrival of the Spaniards on the shores of Limasawa in 1521.
By the middle of the 16th century, the Sulu Sultanate was already considered a de facto and de jure
nation state, having entered treaties with Spain in 1578, Britain in 1761, the French in 1843 and the
Americans in 1842, 1899 and 1915 (Caballero-Anthony, 2007 )
You can watch a news feature ABS-CBN about the Sultan who died in Shantung, China in
this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQSFg2mYsk4.
As we learned in lesson 2, the Westphalian theory was the model for the modern interstate system.
But what exactly is the interstate system? In the final lesson of this module, we will get to know
how modern nations deal with each other in a global interstate system by understanding the
imperialism and colonialism.
Imperialism refers to the “various methods that one country employs to gain political, economic
and military control over another country or geographic area (Ritzer, Dean, 2015). Colonialism on
the other hand is the one of the methods in which one country takes control of a geographic area
that involves the settlement of settlers (ex. Spaniards in the Philippines) and formal mechanisms
of control such as the appointment of a governor general to the Philippines or viceroy to India. The
key difference between imperialism and colonialism is that “imperialism means the practice, the
theory, and the attitudes of the dominating core in ruling the distant territory while ‘colonialism’,
that is usually the consequence of imperialism, is the implanting of settlements on distant territory”
(Said in Ashcroft, Griffiths, and Tiffin 1998: 45). The era of when colonial masters depart from their
former colonies has been labelled post-colonial period.
To sum up, imperialism and colonialism are the ways in which nations of the past asserted
dominance and influence on each other. The fact that we now have concepts such as neo-
colonialism and ‘US imperialism” means that these mechanisms have not ended yet.
The state model in Europe formed out of the treaty of Westphalia was brought to the colonized
lands. Beginning in the late 1400’s, European states, especially the Spaniards and Portuguese,
claimed territories over vast areas of sparsely settled lands in THE Americas, Asia, Africa and
Oceania. European colonizers marked the boundaries in their new territories wherein they
exercised dominion. The “Age of Discovery” began with the Spanish, who conquered the Aztecs and
the Incas, explored and colonized widely in the Caribbean, Mexico, the southern portions of what
was to become the United States, and Central and South America. Spain was able to extend theur
dominion to the Pacific when they colonized the Philippines and Guam. The Portuguese empire on
the other hand included Brazil, the largest colonial territory in South America; Angola and
Mozambique in Africa; and Goa in South Asia. However, beginning in the early early 19th century,
rebellions and wars for independence ended the first phase of European colonialism by the. By
1825 most of Spain’s colonies were politically independent but they managed to hold on to Cuba
and the Philippines until 1898(Kottak, 2011).
In the post-colonial era, many nations, including the Philippines, define their borders based on the
lines drawn by their former colonial masters. Understanding how nations conduct affairs today in
the global stage entails the recognition/ taking into consideration) of its colonial past. As Ritzer and
Dean (2015) reminds us, postcolonialism relates “to the various developments that take place in a
former colony after the colonizing power departs”. While colonial systems have largely
disappeared, this power relationship endured through multinational corporations and global
financial institutions like the World Bank and the IMF. These World Bank and IMF, which are
largely dominated by the rich core countries, make loans to countries in the periphery and
semiperiphery countires. By setting the terms of these global loans and repayment, they ensure
financial rewards flow back to wealthy countries.
Although 130 former colonies gained their independence over the course of the twentieth century,
exploitation continues today through neocolonialism (neo is Greek for “new”), a new form of
global power relationships that involves not direct political control but economic exploitation by
multinational corporations (Macionis, 2012). A multinational corporation is a large business that
operates in many countries. Corporate leaders often impose their will on countries in which they do
business to create favorable economic conditions for the operation of their corporations, just as
colonizers did in the past (Bonanno, Constance, & Lorenz, 2000).
And like many former colonies, the Philippines is a prime example of a nation struggling to
economically as a result of hundreds of years colonial exploitation by the Spaniards and the
Americans.
Today’s global economy is largely shaped by colonialism which designated some countries as
sources of resources, cheap labor, and markets. It left a political legacy of weak governments
dominated by oligarchies, monarchies, or dictators leaving most of the population deprived of basic
services and unable to rise form poverty.
An excellent way of understanding how colonialism shaped global political and economic hierarchy
of societies of today is through Immanuel Wallerstein’s model of the “capitalist world economy
which suggests that the prosperity of some nations and the poverty and dependency of other
countries is intentional as a result of the global economic system (Macionis, 2012). The World
Systems Theory is also discussed in lesson two of module two as a form of economic globalization.
Wealthy nations are designated by Wallerstein as the core of the world economy. Through
colonialism, these countries funneled raw materials from around the world to Western Europe
which powered the Industrial Revolution. On the other hand, low-income countries are the
periphery of the world economy. Through colonialism, these poor nations provide raw materials,
cheap labor, and a vast market for industrial products that enrich the core countries through their
multinational corporations.
Consequently, the world economy benefits rich societies by generating more profits for wealth
countries at the expense of poor countries.
The world economy thus makes poor nations dependent on rich ones. Today, multinational
corporations operate profitably worldwide, channeling wealth to North America, Western Europe,
Australia, and Japan. For more comprehensive discussion of the world systems theory (Martínez-
Vela, 2001).
Below is an excerpt from Chirico’s (2013) Chapter on Globalizing Political Culture and State
Governance
Globalization affects internal changes in states through external and internal pressures.
External pressures on states compel conformity to global standards/ Globalization
pressures confront states wth a variety pf potential costs if they refuse to comply and
promise benefits if they do. States conform global standards to gain admission to regional
and interest-based alliances, such as the ASEAN and APEC, to receive loans, attract
investments, gain trading partners, or simply maintain a good reputation and legitimacy in
the eyes of their domestic audience, their allies and the world generally.
Under the terms of Westphalia, whoever held power was recognized by the rest of the
world as the government, regardless of how they attained their rule. Bestowing legitimacy
on a state government is an important function of globalization. Internal pressures for
change come from citizens and other state actors such as institutions and NGOs.
The intensity of countries’ interdependence and the breadth and depth of global systems
has put governance within and among countries at the center of globalization debates. How
countries govern matters to other countries and to the mechanics of global economy, polity,
and social community. The pressures on states to conform to global standards result from
the diffusion of emerging global political culture and participation in global systems.
To understand why “how countries govern matters to other countries and to the mechanics of
global economy”, let us discuss the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). WGI is comprised of a
set of composite indicators governance published by World Bank. A country’s score in the WGI
determine the its likelihood of attracting foreign investments, tourism, financial and other forms of
aid, and global reputation. In other words, the WGI is similar to Westphalia Treaty in that it is a set
of norms in which countries abide in order to create and maintain relations with other countries.
These set of norms set by the WGI are elaborated in its six dimensions of governance including:
Voice and Accountability; Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism; Government
Effectiveness; Regulatory Quality; Rule of Law; and Control of Corruption. In western standards,
each of these aspects of governance matters for development, and so unsurprisingly rich countries
on average rank higher in the WGI than poor countries do (Kaufmann & Kraay, 2017)
Because of this, the term ‘Imperial Manila’ was coined/ came about to describe the
dominance of the capital city in the economic and political affairs over local governments.
Among the main complaints are that imperial Manila benefits disproportionately from both
public and private sector spending and investments; that it controls public spending
allocations to LGUs; and that it also passes on unfunded mandates to local government
units (LGUs), further shrinking their elbow room to finance and craft their homegrown
development strategies.
Thus the present system is reflects the core-periphery analyses of Wallerstein wherein the
local governments represents the periphery that depends heavily on the central
government that seated in Manila. On the other hand, the central government fails to
support decentralization, and often ends up consolidating power by controlling much of the
public resource allocations leading to underdevelopment in many local provinces
(Mendoza & Ocampo, 2017)
Looking at the poverty incidence in Mindanao, we might say this is not far from truth. As of
2015, poverty incidence in Mindanao is at 36.2% which higher than the national average of
21.6%. The largest share of the country’s poor population comes from Mindanao with four
of the five poorest regions are in Mindanao: Regions IX, X, XII, and XIII, and the
Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, all of which had poverty incidence above 39% in
2015 (ADB, 2017)
After each group representative has provided their input, you may now facilitate the class discussion in
identifying the key concepts about globalization that makes sense to the class and create working
definition of globalization for the course.
Part 2 of the activity will help the students to write a personal definition of globalization based on a
concept map. As each group representative is sharing their group’s output, each student may take down
the concepts or words that makes sense to him or her on what globalization is. To guide the
students, you may give this question: What are the key words about globalization that makes it easier for
you to understand it?
In assigning a concept map, you have your students use the template below. The students may fill-up
the spaces with the key words or concepts they took note earlier. Ask the students to write their own
personal definition of globalization based on the concept map they have created.
_________ _________
_________ _________
Concepts
related to
Globalization
_________ _________
_________
_________
Other ways that students can recognize and reflect on how globalization touches their lives can be
through the following questions:
1. Is it possible to make friends with someone who lives outside of the Philippines? Is it possible to
stay in touch with them? What makes this possible?
2. Identify a local clothing brand (shirts, shoe brands, bags, etc.). Are their products made in the
Philippines? If not, why do you think they choose to manufacture their products abroad?
3. What sports do you like to play or watch? Is this sports famous only in the Philippines? Do you
watch the local and/or international tournaments of this sports? How are you able to watch the
international tournaments?
You may ask 3-5 students to share their answers to the entire class.
You may group your students into 5-6 groups according to the dimensions of the
Worldwide Governance Indicators. Assign each group to research the descriptions and
details of their assigned dimension. It is also helpful to review how the Philippines
performed based on WGI. You can find the results for the Philippines in t his link:
http://governance.neda.gov.ph/worldwide-governance-indicators/
Have each group or a representative present to the entire class what they have researched
using the guide questions below:
You may grade the students’ group performance using the rubric below:
Guide to using “The China Ship” series for “The Contemporary World”
1. Follow the link below
https://multimedia.scmp.com/culture/article/spanish-galleon/chapter_01.html
2. You may read the entire series and integrate the relevant information discussed.
Chapter one discussed the discovery of the tornaviaje which began in the
Philippines. Chapter two then provides an extensive and interesting discussion of
how the Galleons that journeyed from Manila to Acapulco were built in the
shipyards of Cavite. The third chapter provides a compelling visual narration of the
voyage from Philippines to Acapulco dubbed “A journey of dread”. The final
chapter gives an extensive discussion on how “Spain instituted a common currency
in the form of the Real de a Ocho or the Spanish dollar, globalization’s first chapter
had been written. The acceptance of the dollar coins for commercial transactions
throughout Asia, the Americas and much of Europe, resulted in a cultural exchange
between nations, as well as the relatively free movement of people and goods
between the three continents”
3. You may integrated “The China Ship” in your discussion or assigned as supplemental
reading or activity to your students. Below are examples of guide questionsyou’re
your students to reflect upon as they go about exploring the series:
a. Why was the discovery of the tornaviaje important in the history of
globalization?
b. What role did the Philippines play in the discovery of the tornaviaje?
c. Describe the process of building the Galleon. From what place in the
Philippines were the materials taken from? How many workers were needed
Abinales, P. N., & Amoroso, D. J. (2017). State and Society in the Philippines. Rowman &
Littlefield.
Claudio, L. E. (2014). Locating the Global South (Vol. 1, pp. 185-99). London: Sage
Reference.
Macionis, J. J. (2012). Sociology 14th Ed. Pearson Education, Inc. Page 280
Martínez-Vela, C. A. (2001). World systems theory. Engineering System Division, 83, 1-5.
Mendoza, R. U., & Ocampo, J. (2017). Caught between imperial Manila and the provincial
dynasties: Towards a new fiscal federalism.
Porio, E. (2009). Shifting spaces of power in Metro Manila. City, 13(1), 110-119.
Ritzer, G., & Dean, P. (2015). Globalization: A basic text. John Wiley & Sons. Page 56
Kottak, C. P. (2011). Cultural anthropology: Appreciating cultural diversity. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2017, September 22). Measuring the
ups and downs of governance. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-
development/2017/09/22/measuring-the-ups-and-downs-of-governance/