Monthly Production Report

Draft minutes of meeting: Monthly Production Report (MPR)
Date: 26.02.2008
Place: OLF, Forus
Chairing: Thore Langeland, OLF
Minutes: Thore Langeland, OLF
Present:
 Rune Hult, NPD
 Hans Stokka, NPD
 Espen Halvorsen. StatoilHydro
 Gry Tinnesand, ConocoPhillips
 Thor Inge Bollestad, BP
 Guro Andersen, ENI
 Arvid Mjeldheim, Shell
 Jan Rasmussen, ExxonMobil
 Kåre M. Voll, ExxonMobil
 Phillipe Baldy, Total
 Hjørdis Bowitz Myhre, Total
 Åge Helgeland, Petoro
 Jarl Eide, TietoEnator
 Jan Ingvar Riveland, TieotoEnator
 Magnus Svensson, TietoEnator
 Oddvar Nesset, TietoEnator
 Kari Anne Haaland Thorsen, UiS
 Chunming Rong, UiS
 Henrik Forssel, PCA
 Pål Rylandsholm, DNV
 Inge Knudsen, IBM
 Henrik Slettene, SAS Institute
 Thore Langeland, OLF
With apologies:
 Roar Bøe, Gassco
 Frode Ljones, Total
Agenda
1. Approval of agenda
2. Approval of MoM
3. Status on reference data - DNV/Epsis/TietoEnator (TE)
4. Status on XML schema - TE
5. Status on validating functions for COPEX - TE/NPD
6. Demo of the solution (chosen production units from BP and Statoilhydro?) -
TE/BP/StatoilHydro
7. Readiness for testing - BP and StatoilHydro
Page 1 of 3
OLF The Norwegian Oil Industry Association www.olf.no

Vassbotnen 1, P.O.Box 8065, N-4068 Stavanger
Telephone 51 84 65 00. Fax 51 84 65 01. [email protected]
Member of the Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry (NHO)
8. Action items
9. A.O.B.
Minutes:
1. Approval of agenda
The agenda was approved by adding next meeting to 9. A.O.B.
2. Approval of minutes of meeting

The minutes of the meeting was approved with the following comments to the
action items:
1. Done – according to contract.
2. Done. The selected fields are Ula (BP) and Visund (StatoilHydro). It was
commented that these fields do not report on sales/liftings.
3. Only partly done missing some reference data for partner reporting.
Furthermore, reference data for PRODML which is not in the scope of
DNV’s work.
4. Done.
5. Done.
6. The plan to be discussed in the meeting.
3. Status on reference data - DNV/Epsis/TietoEnator

DNV and Epsis have started the work on linking the reference data to the
concepts in the XML schemas using the SAWSDL standard of W3C. DNV’s
C:\Documents and
Settings\tla\Mine dokumenter\IO\4_DI\Prodata\080226_MPR_Reference Data.ppt
DNV’s presentation attached.
The W3C recommendations (standards) are stable in the sense that they do
not disappear from W3C website.
4. Status XML schemas

Very good progress - most work done, but some new issues coming up such
as “components analysis not directly connected to month data” from Gassco.
C:\Documents and
Settings\tla\Mine dokumenter\IO\4_DI\Prodata\080226_MPR_XML.ppt
TietoEnator’s presentation attached.
5. Status on validating functions for COPEX - TE/NPD

Very good progress and most work done, but still some clarifications with NPD
on the rules are needed.
Page 2 of 3

C:\Documents and
Settings\tla\Mine dokumenter\IO\4_DI\Prodata\080226_Rubin monthly Copex report.htm
6. Demo of the solution (chosen production units from BP and

Statoilhydro?) - TE/BP/StatoilHydro
Good progress, but some some issues remains to be solved:
 "sample" as concept missing
o Sample date
o RVP
o MMol wt.
o Component break down
Based on one report only(Ula). More example needed
 Need an example of “partial liftings”
 Facility naming sould follow official naming
Need a dialogue with Gassco.
The industry would like to have the style sheets/XSLT to be open and
accessible to all?
7. Readiness for testing - BP and StatoilHydro

Both StatoilHydro and TietoEnator are ready for testing. Partners in Ula and
Visund should be involved in the validation of the pilot.
8. Action items
1. OLF makes overview of the purpose of the project and the stakeholders
2. TietoEnator invites NPD and Landmark to a meeting for discussions of
validation rules
3. TietoEnator contacts Gassco regarding more examples on "sample
analysis”
4. TietoEnator invites core group to meeting to discuss lifting and remaining
definitions
5. TietoEnator invites NPD and Landmark to meeting for discussions of
validation rules
6. IBM to get the collaboration room up running
7. OLF to check if additional reports/fields can be used for testing
 Gassco ought be involved in testing
 ExxonMobil gas sales should be included in the pilot
8. OLF to check if BP is ready for testing
9. OLF should check for the possibility of having the style sheets/XSLT in the
public domain
9. A.O.B.
Next meeting: 17.06.2008 at 09:30 -12:00 at OLF.
Page 3 of 3


Monthly Production Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Monthly Production Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Monthly Production Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Draft minutes of meeting: Monthly Production Report (MPR)

OLF The Norwegian Oil Industry Association www.olf.no

2. Approval of minutes of meeting

3. Status on reference data - DNV/Epsis/TietoEnator

4. Status XML schemas

5. Status on validating functions for COPEX - TE/NPD

OLF The Norwegian Oil Industry Association www.olf.no

6. Demo of the solution (chosen production units from BP and

7. Readiness for testing - BP and StatoilHydro

OLF The Norwegian Oil Industry Association www.olf.no

You might also like