3 BodyPart
3 BodyPart
3 BodyPart
1.0 Problem
Statement ............................................................................................................... 13
1.1
Background ...................................................................................................................
... 1.1.1
13
School of Chemical Engineering
Introduction ...............................................................................................................
1.1.2
13
EKC 451 Plant Designs 2018/2019
Application ................................................................................................................
1.2 14Importance of Propylene Glycol from Malaysia point of
view ....................................... 16 FULL REPORT
1.2.1
Demand ......................................................................................................................
1.2.2
16
Supply ........................................................................................................................
1.3 19Letter of
Transmittal......................................................................................................... 21
1.4 Scope of
Project ............................................................................................................... 24
1.5 Gantt
Chart ....................................................................................................................... 25
2.0 Process
Alternatives ............................................................................................................. 26
2.1 Discussion of the process
alternatives .............................................................................. 26
Plant
2.1.1 Design
Production for theglycol
of propylene Production
from glycerol ofin Propylene
Escherichia Glycol
coli. ........................... 26
2.1.2 Hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol using Cu-ZnO
GROUPcatalyst. ................. 28: 17
2.1.3 Hydrogenation of biomass derived lactic acid to propylene glycol over a
GROUPcarbon-
MEMBERS :
supported ruthenium
2.2 1.Comparison
catalyst. MARYbetween Process
JOAN .............................................................................................
A/P PATRICK GEORGE (129073) 30
Alternatives ...................................................................... 34
2.32.Choice
LOW YING of KAI (131602)
3. NUR
Process .............................................................................................................
AMNI BINTI MD ANUAR (129109) 38
2.44.Current related problem of the plant to the environment and
society
5. NURUL..............................
AFINI BINTI FUAD 38 (129121)
3.0 Critical Assessment of the Process Chosen 3.1 Capacity of
SHERRINE A/P ARULDASS
Plant ...................................... 38 (129129)
3.1.1 Plant
Capacity ............................................................................................................ 38
SUPERVISOR
3.1.2 Location of the designed : DR. FADZIL NOOR GUNAWAN
plant...................................................................................
: 19th DECEMBER 2018 40
DATE OF SUBMISSION
3.1.3 Complete Process
Description ................................................................................... 42
3.2 Process Chemistry, Reactions, Kinetics, Thermodynamics Data & Other Physical
and
Chemical Properties
Data3.2.1
.......................................................................................................
Process 43
Chemistry ..................................................................................................... 43
3.2.2
Reactions ...................................................................................................................
44
1
3.2.3 Reaction
kinetics........................................................................................................ 44
3.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of
Process ...................................................................... 46
3.4 Environmental (disposal of waste, if any), Safety and Health
Concerns ......................... 47
3.5 Similar Plant with Plant Capacity and Total Capital
Investment ..................................... 48
3.6 Projected Demands/Supply for Next 10
Years ................................................................ 49
4.0 Process Synthesis Structure and
Analysis............................................................................ 50
4.1 Input-Output Structure with Feed and Specifications, Price of all product, By-
product
and Raw
Materials.
4.1.1 Input-Output
.................................................................................................................
Structure with Feed and 50
Specifications ............................................... 50
4.1.2 Feed and product
specification .................................................................................. 54
4.1.3 Price of all product, by product and raw
materials .................................................... 55
4.2 Destination of Codes and Component Classification,
Utilities ........................................ 56
4.2.1 Destination of Codes and Component
Classification ................................................ 56
4.2.2
Utilities ......................................................................................................................
5.0 Process
58 Flow Diagram
(PFD) .............................................................................................. 59
5.1 Block
Diagram ................................................................................................................. 59
5.2 Process Synthesis Flow
Sheet .......................................................................................... 60
5.3 Innovation approach of Process
Design ........................................................................... 60
5.4 Process Flow Diagram
(PFD) .......................................................................................... 61
6.0 Process
Analysis ............................................................................................................. 62
6.1 Process
Description ..................................................................................................... 62
6.2 Justification of Each Equipment
Chosen .................................................................... 62
6.2.1 Heat
Exchanger ....................................................................................................
6.2.2 Reboiler
63 .........................................................................................................
....... 67
6.2.3 Compressor ...................................................................................................
....... 69
6.2.4 Distillation
column............................................................................................... 70
6.2.5 Packed Bed
Reactor ............................................................................................. 73
6.2.6 Pumps............................................................................................................
....... 75
2
6.2.7 Reflux
drum ......................................................................................................... 77
6.2.8 Flash
Drum...........................................................................................................
6.2.9 79
Condenser ..................................................................................................................
6.2.10
80
Expander ..................................................................................................................
6.2.11
83 Number of Equipment Units
Required .................................................................... 85
6.3 Code
Justification ............................................................................................................. 85
6.4 Economical
Potential................................................................................................... 85
6.4.1 Prices of Raw Material and
Product .................................................................... 85
6.4.2 Input and Output Structure without
Recycle ....................................................... 86
6.5 Separation Operations Used in Production in Production of Propylene
Glycol ......... 90
7.0 Material and Energy
Balance .......................................................................................... 92
7.1 Mass Balance
Theory .................................................................................................. 92
7.2 Stream
Table .................................................................................................................... 93
7.3 Energy Balance
Theory .................................................................................................... 94
7.4 Aspen
Simulation ........................................................................................................
7.4.195 Aspen Flow
Sheet ................................................................................................ 95
7.4.2 Aspen Simulation
Result...................................................................................... 95
7.4.3 Table of comparison between Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN PLUS
Simulation...................................................................................................................
........ 97
8.0 Utilities.....................................................................................................................
..... 101
8.1. Utilities
Summary ..................................................................................................... 101
8.2 Electricity .............................................................................................................
..... 103
8.3 Waste
Generation ......................................................................................................
8.3.1103 Solid Waste
Quantity ............................................................................................... 103
8.3.2 Liquid Waste
Quantity............................................................................................. 104
8.3.3 Gaseous Waste
Quantity.......................................................................................... 105
9.0 Mass Transfer Equipment
Design ................................................................................. 106
9.1 Distillation Column, V-
201 ....................................................................................... 108
3
9.2 Distillation Column, V-
301 ....................................................................................... 111
9.3 Distillation Column, V-
401 ....................................................................................... 113
10.0 Heat Transfer Equipment
Design.................................................................................. 117
10.1 Heat Exchanger, E-
101 ............................................................................................. 119
10.2 Heat Exchanger, E-
102 ............................................................................................. 122
10.3 Heat Exchanger, E-
104 ............................................................................................. 125
10.4 Heat Exchanger, E-
201 ............................................................................................. 128
10.5 Heat Exchanger, E-
301 ............................................................................................. 131
10.6 Heat Exchanger, E-
401 ............................................................................................. 134
10.7 Condenser, E-
103 ...................................................................................................... 137
10.8 Condenser, E-
202 ...................................................................................................... 140
10.9 Condenser, E-
302 ...................................................................................................... 143
10.10 Condenser, E-
402 ...................................................................................................... 146
10.11 Reboiler, E-
203 .......................................................................................................... 149
10.12 Reboiler, E-
303 .......................................................................................................... 150
10.13 Reboiler, E-
403 .......................................................................................................... 151
11.0 Reactor
Design .............................................................................................................. 152
11.1 Packed Bed Reactor, R-
101 ...................................................................................... 152
12.0 Auxiliary Equipment
Design ........................................................................................ 156
12.1
Pump.............................................................................................................................
12.1.1 Pump, P-
156
101 .......................................................................................................... 156
12.1.2 Pump, P-
301 .......................................................................................................... 157
12.1.3 Pump, P-
401 .......................................................................................................... 158
12.2
Compressor...................................................................................................................
12.2.1 Compressor, C-
159
101 ................................................................................................ 159
12.3 Flash
Drum ................................................................................................................... 160
12.3.1 Flash Drum, V-
101 ................................................................................................ 160
4
12.4
Expander.......................................................................................................................
16112.4.1 Expander, D-
101 .................................................................................................... 161
12.5 Reflux
Drum................................................................................................................. 163
12.5.1 Reflux Drum, V-
202 .............................................................................................. 163
12.5.2 Reflux Drum, V-
302 .............................................................................................. 164
12.5.3 Reflux Drum, V-
402 .............................................................................................. 165
13.0
References .......................................................................................................................
.Appendix
166 A: Thermodynamic
Data ......................................................................................... 176
Appendix B: Material Safety Data
Sheet ................................................................................. 179
B.1 Material Safety Datasheet of Propylene Glycol [76]
....................................................... 179
B.2 Material Safety Datasheet of Glycerol [78]
..................................................................... 184
B.3 Material Safety Datasheet of Hydrogen [79]
................................................................... 188
B.4 Material Safety Datasheet of Methanol
[80].................................................................... 197
B.5 Material Safety Datasheet of Water [81]
......................................................................... 201
B.6 Material Safety Datasheet of Ethylene Glycol [82]
......................................................... 204
B.7 Material Safety Datasheet of Acetol [83]
........................................................................ 209
Appendix C: Mass Balance on Individual
Unit ....................................................................... 214
C.1 Pump (P-
101) ............................................................................................................. 214
C.2 Heat Exchanger (E-
101) ............................................................................................ 215
C.3 Compressor (C-
101)................................................................................................... 216
C.4 Mixing
Point .............................................................................................................. 217
C.5 Heat Exchanger (E-
102) ............................................................................................ 218
C.6 Packed Bed Reactor (R-
101) ..................................................................................... 219
C.7 Condenser (E-
103) ..................................................................................................... 220
C.8 Heat Exchanger (E-
104) ............................................................................................ 221
C.9 Flash Drum (V-
101) ................................................................................................... 222
C.10 Splitting
Point .......................................................................................................... 223
5
C.11 Expander (D-
101) .................................................................................................... 224
C.12 Heat Exchanger (E-
201) .......................................................................................... 225
C.13 Distillation Column (V-
201) .................................................................................... 226
C.14 Condenser (E-
202) ................................................................................................... 227
C.15 Reflux Drum (V-
202) .............................................................................................. 228
C.16 Reboiler (E-
203) ...................................................................................................... 229
C.17 Pump (P-
301) ........................................................................................................... 230
C.18 Heat Exchanger (E-
301) .......................................................................................... 231
C.19 Distillation Column (V-
301) .................................................................................... 232
C.20 Condenser (E-
302) ................................................................................................... 233
C.21 Reflux Drum (V-
302) .............................................................................................. 234
C.22 Reboiler (E-
303) ...................................................................................................... 235
C.23 Pump (P-
401) ........................................................................................................... 236
C.24 Heat Exchanger (E-
401) .......................................................................................... 237
C.25 Distillation Column (V-
401) .................................................................................... 238
C.26 Condenser (E-
402) ................................................................................................... 239
C.27 Reflux drum (V-
402) ............................................................................................... 240
C.28 Reboiler (E-
403) ...................................................................................................... 241
C.29 Overall Mass Balance of
Streams ............................................................................ 242
Appendix D: Energy Balance on Individual
Equipment ......................................................... 246
D.1 Pump (P-
101)......................................................................................................... 246
F.2 Heat Exchanger (E-
101) ........................................................................................ 247
D.3 Compressor (C-
101) .............................................................................................. 248
D.4 Mixing
Point .......................................................................................................... 249
D.5 Heat Exchanger (E-
102) ........................................................................................ 250
D.6 Packed Bed Reactor (R-
101) ................................................................................. 251
D.7 Condenser (E-
103) ................................................................................................. 252
D.8 Heat Exchanger (E-
104) ........................................................................................ 253
6
D.9 Flash Drum (V-
101) .............................................................................................. 254
D.10 Splitting
Point ........................................................................................................ 255
D.11 Expander (D-
101) .................................................................................................. 256
D.12 Heat Exchanger (E-
201) ........................................................................................ 257
D.13 Distillation Column (V-
201) ................................................................................. 258
D.14 Condenser (E-
202) ................................................................................................. 259
D.15 Reflux Drum (V-
202) ............................................................................................ 260
D.16 Reboiler (E-
203) .................................................................................................... 261
D.17 Pump (P-
301)......................................................................................................... 262
D.18 Heat Exchanger (E-
301) ........................................................................................ 263
D.19 Distillation Column (V-
301) ................................................................................. 264
D.20 Condenser (E-
302) ................................................................................................. 265
D.21 Reflux Drum (V-
302) ............................................................................................ 266
D.22 Reboiler (E-
303) .................................................................................................... 267
D.23 Pump (P-
401)......................................................................................................... 268
D.24 Heat Exchanger (E-
401) ........................................................................................ 269
D.25 Distillation Column (V-
401) ................................................................................. 270
D.26 Condenser (E-
402) ................................................................................................. 271
D.27 Reflux Drum (V-
402) ............................................................................................ 272
D.28 Reboiler (E-
403) .................................................................................................... 273
D.29 Overall Energy Balance Followed Stream
Number........................................... 274
D.30 Heat Capacity Constants and Heat of Formation for
Components.......................... 276
Appendix E:
Utilities ............................................................................................................... 277
E.1 Utility Stream
Balance .............................................................................................. 277
Appendix F: Mass Transfer Equipment
Design....................................................................... 282
F.1 Distillation Column, V-
201 ........................................................................................... 282
F.2 Distillation Column, V-
301 ........................................................................................... 299
F.3 Distillation Column, V-
401 ........................................................................................... 315
7
Appendix G: Heat Transfer Equipment
Design ....................................................................... 332
G.1 Heat Exchanger, E-
101.................................................................................................. 332
G.2 Condenser, E-
103 .......................................................................................................... 341
G.3 Reboiler, E-
203 ............................................................................................................. 353
Appendix H: Reactor
Design ................................................................................................... 362
H.1 Packed Bed Reactor, R-
101........................................................................................... 362
Appendix I: Auxiliary Equipment
Design ............................................................................... 381
I.1 Pump, P-
101 .................................................................................................................... 381
I.2 Pump, P-
301 .................................................................................................................... 385
I.3 Pump, P-
401 .................................................................................................................... 389
I.4 Compressor, C-
101 ......................................................................................................... 393
I.5 Flash Drum, V-
101 ......................................................................................................... 397
I.6 Expander, D-
101 ............................................................................................................. 407
I.7 Reflux Drum, V-
202 ....................................................................................................... 409
I.8 Reflux Drum, V-
302 ....................................................................................................... 411
I.9 Reflux Drum, V-
402 ....................................................................................................... 412
Appendix J: Minutes of
Meeting ............................................................................................. 414
8
Table 1: Gantt
Chart ............................................................................................................... 25
Table 2: Comparison table between 3 process
alternatives ................................................. 34
Table 3: Rough calculation for plant capacity for production of propylene glycol. ..........
40
Table 4: Palm oil plantation area in Malaysia List of Tableby state (2016). [36]
...................................... 41
Table 5: Advantages and disadvantage of hydrogenolysis of propylene glycol from
glycerol .............................................................................................................................
.. 46
Table 6: Environmental, Safety and Health
Concerns ......................................................... 47
Table 7: Similar Plant with Plant Capacity and Total Capital Investment .......................
48
Table 8: Input-Output
Structure. .......................................................................................... 51
Table 9: Feed and Product
Specification. .............................................................................. 54
Table 10: Price of Raw Materials, By Products and Products ............................................
55
Table 11: Basis and cost calculation for the designed
plant. ............................................... 55
Table 12: Destination of Codes and Component
Classification........................................... 57
Table 13 Justification on the Heat Exchanger and Material of Construction ...................
64
Table 14 Justification on the Reboiler and Material Construction .....................................
67
Table 15 Justification on the Compressor and Material Construction ..............................
70
Table 16 Justification on the Distillation Column and Material Construction ..................
71
Table 17 Justification on the Packed Bed Reactor and Material Construction .................
74
Table 18 Justification on the Centrifugal Pump and Material Construction ....................
76
Table 19 Justification on the Reflux Drum and Material Construction .............................
78
Table 20 Justification on the Flash Drum and Material Construction ...............................
80
Table 21 Justification on the Condenser and Material Construction .................................
81
Table 22 Justification on the Expander and Material Construction ..................................
84
Table 23 Number of equipment units
required ..................................................................... 85
Table 24 Prices of Raw Materials and
Product..................................................................... 85
Table 25 Economics Potential of Production Plant of Propylene Glycol at Different
Conversion without Recycle
Stream ............................................................................... 86
Table 26 Economics Potential of Production Plant of Propylene Glycol at Different
Recycle
Percentages .......................................................................................................... 88
Table 27 Separation of Operations Used in the
Production ................................................ 90
Table 28 Molecular Weight of 9
Components .......................................................................... 92
Table 29 Conversion of reactions takes place in the
plant ................................................... 92
Table 30 Overall Stream Table for Mass Balance (Stream 1-Stream 19) ..........................
Table 38 Justification table between Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus
Simulation.........................................................................................................................
. 99
Table 39 Amount of steam required for heating
utilities ................................................... 101
Table 40 Amount of steam required for cooling utilities ...................................................
102
Table 41 Electrical energy required for pump, compressor and expander......................
103
Table 42 Quantity of waste produced per
hour .................................................................. 104
Table 43 Specification Sheet of Distillation Column V-201 ...............................................
108
Table 44 Specification Sheet of Distillation Column V-301 ...............................................
111
Table 45 Specification Sheet of Distillation Column V-401 ...............................................
114
Table 46 Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger E-
101 ..................................................... 119
Table 47 Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger E-
102 ..................................................... 122
Table 48 Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger E-
104 ..................................................... 125
Table 49 Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger E-
201 ..................................................... 128
Table 50 Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger E-
301 ..................................................... 131
Table 51 Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger E-
401 ..................................................... 134
Table 52 Specification Sheet of Condenser E-
103............................................................... 137
Table 53 Specification Sheet for Condenser E-
202 ............................................................. 140
Table 54 Specification Sheet of Condenser E-
302............................................................... 143
Table 55 Specification Sheet of Condenser E-
402............................................................... 146
Table 56 Specification Sheet of Reboiler E-
203 .................................................................. 149
Table 57 Specification Sheet of Reboiler E-
203 .................................................................. 150
Table 58 Specification Sheet of Reboiler E-
403 .................................................................. 151
Table 59 Specification Sheet of Packed Bed Reactor R-
101 .............................................. 153
Table 60 Specification Sheet of Pump P-
101 ....................................................................... 156
Table 61 Specification Sheet of Pump P-
301 ....................................................................... 157
Table 62 Specification Sheet of Pump P-
401 ....................................................................... 158
Table 63 Specification Sheet of Compressor C-
101 ............................................................ 159
Table 64 Specification Sheet of Flash Drum V-
101 ............................................................ 161
Table 65 Specification Sheet of Expander D-
101 ................................................................ 162
Table 66 Specification Sheet of Reflux Drum V- 10
202 .......................................................... 163
Table 67 Specification Sheet of Reflux Drum V-
302 .......................................................... 164
Table 68 Specification Sheet of Reflux Drum V-
Table 80 Amount of heating fluid for Heat Exchanger (E-104) ........................................
278
Table 81 Amount of heating fluid for Heat Exchanger (E-201) ........................................
278
Table 82 Amount of cooling fluid for Condenser (E-202) ..................................................
278
Table 83 Amount of heating fluid for Reboiler (E-203) .....................................................
279
Table 84 Amount of heating fluid for Heat Exchanger (E-301) ........................................
279
Table 85 Amount of cooling fluid for Condenser (E-302) ..................................................
279
Table 86 Amount of heating fluid for Reboiler (E-303) .....................................................
280
Table 87 Amount of heating fluid for Heat Exchanger (E-401) ........................................
280
Table 88 Amount of cooling fluid for Condenser (E-402) ..................................................
280
Table 89 Amount of heating fluid for Reboiler (E-403) .....................................................
281
Table 90 Amount of heating fluid for Packed Bed Reactor Jacket ...................................
281
Table 91: Chemical and Physical Properties ..............................Error! Bookmark not
defined.
11
Figure 1: Chemical structure of propylene glycol. [2]
........................................................... 13
Figure 2: World consumption of propylene glycol in 2016. [7]
............................................. 17
Figure 3: Global Propylene Glycol Market in 2017, by End-Use Industry. [9] ...................
18
Figure 4: Global Propylene Glycol Market, List ofBy Figure
Application, 2014-2024. [10]......................
18
Figure 5: Import of Propylene glycol to Malaysia. [11]
.......................................................... 19
Figure 6: The E. coli pathways involved in the synthesis of propylene glycol through
fermentation of glycerol. [17]
............................................................................................. 27
Figure 7: The basic flow of fermentation of
glycerol. ........................................................... 28
Figure 8: Hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol.
[19].............................................. 28
Figure 9: Basic block flow diagram for conversion of glycerol to propylene glycol using
Cu-ZnO
catalyst. ............................................................................................................... 29
Figure 10: Basic Process Flow Diagram for Conversion of glycerol to propylene glycol
using Cu-ZnO
catalyst...................................................................................................... 30
Figure 11: Conversion of biomass derived lactic acid to propylene glycol.
[22]................... 30
Figure 12: Process Flow Diagram for Conversion of lactic acid to propylene glycol. .......
31
Figure 13: Propylene glycol: world capacity broken down by region, 2013 [32] ..................
39
Figure 14: Location of the designed
plant ............................................................................. 40
Figure 15: Global Propylene Glycol Market Forecast (2018-2018) ....................................
50
Figure 16: Block Diagram for Production of Propylene Glycol ..........................................
59
Figure 17: Process Synthesis Flow Sheet for Production of Propylene Glycol ..................
60
Figure 18: Process Flow Diagram for Production of Propylene Glycol .............................
61
Figure 19 Heat Exchanger
[88]. ................................................................................................ 63
Figure 20: Reboiler
[90]. ............................................................................................................ 67
Figure 21: Compressor
[92]....................................................................................................... 69
Figure 22: Basic distillation column that used in industry
[94]. ............................................ 70
Figure 23: Basic Packed Bed Reactor that used in industry
[97]. ......................................... 73
Figure 24: Pump
[103]. ............................................................................................................... 75
Figure 25: Reflux drum
[108]. ................................................................................................... 77
Figure 26: Flash drum
[109]. ..................................................................................................... 79
Figure 27: Condenser
[113]. ....................................................................................................... 80
Figure 28: Expander
[116].......................................................................................................... 83 12
Figure 29: Input-Output
Structure ........................................................................................ 86
Figure 30: Graph of Economics Potential of Production Plant of Propylene Glycol against
as
1.0aProblem
heat transfer medium to decrease the freezing point of a liquid. Hence, it provides
Statement
a
The following report discusses about the plant design for the production of propylene
prevention
glycol. from pressure burst, corrosion, overheating and freezing. In the
pharmaceutical
industry, it is used as an excipient, a non-active enabling agent. It helps to enhance
1.1 Background
solubility,
The following section describes about the plant design of propylene
reduce viscosity and provides long term stabilization. Propylene glycol is used in the
glycol.
food
1.1.1 Introduction
industry to enhance the flavour of food, to maintain moisture in food and to retain a
good taste.
Asia Pacific is one of the major regional market of global propylene glycol
market with
approximately 40% of the market share. The growing demand for environment-friendly
coatings and the accelerating demand from the automotive sector are the dominant
drivers for
the propylene glycol market.[75] The largest end use of propylene glycol is unsaturated
polyester resins as it has contributed about 41% of consumption in the major world
regions.
Other than that, propylene glycol is also used as functional fluids, polyurethanes,
paints and
coatings and miscellaneous applications. According to research, it is reported that in
2016, the Figure 1: Chemical structure of propylene glycol. [2]
consumption of propylene glycol is reported to be 30% of consumption in the major
world Figure 1 shows the chemical structure of propylene glycol. Propylene glycol is an
regions.
organic compound with chemical formula of C3H8O2. It IUPAC name is 1,2-propanediol
and it Currently, the demand for propylene glycol is increasing and is expected to grow
has asymmetrical
in the carbon atom. Thus, it can exist in two enantiomers. In some cases,
this
upcoming years with a growth rate of 3%
compound is known as α-propylene glycol. Propylene glycol is a viscous, colourless and
annually.
odourless
1.1.2 liquid and has a sweet taste. It is chemically categorized as a diol and is
Application
miscible
Propylene glycol is often being used as raw material in numerous manufacturing
with various solvents such as acetone, chloroform and
water.
industries. It is commonly used as an organic solvent and diluent in pharmaceuticals
[2]
and manyPropylene glycol is traditionally produced via hydration of propylene This
other industrial applications. The industrial applications are discussed as
oxide.
below.
propylene oxide is derived from petroleum product. The propylene glycol market is
under
1.1.2.1
pressure Used
due intoPaints & Coatings
increase in oil and natural gas price. Hence, the price of propylene
glycol is
increasing. Now, we
Propylene need
glycol to to
help bepreserve
a pioneersurfaces,
of new alternatives to produce
protect buildings this
against product
weather
withoutchange
depending
and protecton theoilpower
and natural
of paints and varnishes. Propylene glycol is used in paints since
gas.
it can
control the flexibility and hardness of the coatings. It will extend the drying time that
Propylene glycol is used as an antifreeze when there is a possibility for leakage
helps the
surfacewhich
from drying because propylene glycol has a slower evaporation rate than
may cause contact with food in the chemical, pharmaceutical and food industries. It is
water. For
also
latex-based architectural paints, it will provide freeze and thaw stability which makes it
utilized to produce smoke or fog for firefighting training. Propylene glycol is also used
easier
in storage, transportation and handling. These low VOC paint does not cause danger
for
paints and coatings to maintain surface and protect buildings from weather change.
to human
Moreover,
and environment. Besides, some process requires UV-radiation for manufacturing,
it is used in liquid detergents as a stabilizer to remove dirt from washing materials and
printing
aid inpaints or coatings, usage of propylene glycol in the paint is very important since it
inks,
maintaining the properties of detergent even at low temperatures. Propylene glycol is
[3]
also used low emission and also increases energy
produces
efficiency.
13
14
1.1.2.2 Used in Liquid Detergents
Most of the liquid detergents require a homogenous distribution within the liquid
for an
active and effective cleaning. Propylene glycol function as a stabilizer in removing dirt
of the
washing materials and help to retain these properties even at low temperature. This
causes the
cleaning liquids to always remain clear when used at normal temperature. This makes
the
liquid detergent products containing propylene glycol is safer to use and an efficient
cleaning
agent. [4]
Propylene glycol is used as heat transfer medium where it can reduce the
freezing point
of a liquid. Thus, this gives a protection against pressure burst, corrosion, overheating
and
freezing. Propylene glycol have higher boiling point that can lower the vapour pressure.
A
water-propylene glycol mixture becomes cooler and this prevent additional pressure
inside the
pipe or vessels. Hence, it is an ideal solution that help to protect pipe, engine and
cooling
system.
Propylene glycol plays a vital role in industrial applications such as solar panel
systems, marine transportations, Temperature-Sensitive used with engines or under
extreme
conditions and pipes and tubes
[5]
15
1.1.2.5 Food
In 2021, the propylene glycol market is most likely to reach at a CAGR of 5.8% in
the
global propylene glycol market.[8] Based on the CAGR, it is expected that CAGR of 2.8%
growth between 2016 to 2018 and a CAGR of 3.42% from 2018 to 2021. This massive
growth
is mainly contributed by the increasing demand for propylene glycol for the use in
automotive [8]
coolant and also the production of eco-friendly bio-based propylene glycol. Over the
forecast period; from 2018 to 2021, the consumption of propylene glycol is expected to
grow at
a rate of 3% annually. It is reported that in 2016, the largest end use of propylene
glycol is
unsaturated polyester resins as it has contributed about 41% of consumption in the
major world
regions. Other than that, propylene glycol is also used as functional fluids,
polyurethanes,
16
paints and coatings and miscellaneous applications. It is also reported that in 2016, the
consumption of propylene glycol is reported to be 30% of consumption in the major
world
regions.
17
It is also employed in the antifreeze market. Besides that, propylene glycol is also used
as a
solvent in liquid detergent due to its neutral
property.
Figure 4 illustrates the global propylene glycol market by application from 2014-
2024.
From the graph, it is observed that the demand for propylene glycol is expected to
increase in
the years to come. For Malaysia, due to the growth of personal care, food and
pharmaceutical
products manufacturing industries, the demand of propylene glycol increased yearly.
The
import of propylene glycol to Malaysia increased since
1990.
18
urbanization, rising disposable income, changing lifestyle, growing health awareness
and
relaxed investment norms.
[9]
Currently, the market is led by The Dow Chemical Company (U.S) LyondellBasell
Industries N.V. (Netherlands), BASF SE (Germany), Archer Daniels Midland Company
(U.S.),
Global Bio-chem Technology Group Co., Ltd. (China), DuPont Tate & Lyle Bio Products
Company, LLC (U.S.), Huntsman Corporation (U.S.), SKC Co., Ltd. (South Korea), Temix
International S.R.L. (Italy), and Ineos Oxide (Switzerland).
[13]
In 2016, the global exports of propylene glycol reached $589.6M (RM 2.43705
billion)
resulting in propylene glycol being the 1844th most popularly exported product out of
4717
product groups. Over 27 countries export propylene glycol with the top 5 exporting
countries
accounting for $586.9 M (51.8%) of all exports. During this period 49 countries
imported these
products. The largest markets for these products are Denmark ($2.8M), Croatia
($594.8K), Figure ($963.5K),
5: Import of Propylene glycol to Malaysia. [11]
India ($1.6M), Australia and Germany ($299.4M).
[14]
Figure
There is5a shows the import
continuous of propylene
increase glycol
in the supply ofto Malaysia glycol
propylene from 1995 to 2020.
to cater the
From
needs of
the
the graph,
variousitsectors.
is observed that expected
It is also the import of propylene
that the supplyglycol has been
will increase increasing
in years to come to
steadily
meet over
the The current import of propylene glycol in 2018 is 4,445,000 kg. The
the years.
demands of the industry. Propylene glycol plant is yet to be built in Malaysia. Hence,
predicted
there is quantity of propylene glycol in 2025 is about 5 288 000 kg. Hence, the import
imported
no export of propylene glycol from Malaysia. In 2017, The Dow Chemical Company
for
proposed
propylene glycol in Malaysia is expected to Phut,
increase. Thus,which
Malaysia
to build a propylene glycol plant in Map Ta Thailand, haswould be a
a production
potential
capacity of
producer for propylene glycol. If the supply of propylene glycol can be obtained from a
up to 150KTA. This investment will immensely bolster the customers of The Dow
local
Chemical
manufacturer,
Company in thethe cost
Asia of production
Pacific region. can be reduced because export expenses can be
reduced.
[15]
Moreover, the feedstock for the manufacturer is readily available and does not need to
be The current global production of propylene glycol is 2.18 million tons per year
imported so, is
which the expenses for obtaining feedstock can be reduced. Hence, the effect of
mainly
local produced from propylene oxide and sold at $1.0–2.2 per kg. The world’s PG
supply
market will
is help in reducing the production cost of propylene glycol and also reduce the
flow
growing at a rate of 4.5% per annum and is expected to increase
reach 2.56
of Malaysian currency to international market as well as themillion tonsincome
country’s by
2017.
because
Malaysia evolve to become a potential exporter of propylene
glycol.
1.2.2 Supply
The prominent regions for propylene glycol market are North America, Europe
and
Asia Pacific. [12] Asia-Pacific is expected to be growing in the highest rate in the market
for
propylene glycol in the period of 1995 to 2025 due to the rapid industrialization and
19
20
3. Propylene
1.3 Letter glycol manufacturing industry could be a prospering and well
of Transmittal
developed
industry in Malaysia which significantly help to boost the country’s economic
development.
Currently, Asia Pacific
JAJAS Chemical dominated propylene glycol market since propylene glycol is
Sdn. Bhd
consumed in large
Process Design scale
Team for various
Group 17, application. From global perspective, Dow Chemical
Company and Lyondell
Process Design Basell industries are the two dominant players in the propylene
and Analysis
Department,
glycol
Tanjungindustry.
LangsatLyondell Basell
Industrial Area,anticipates to build world largest propylene oxide plant
in
Texas, US that
81700 Pasir will produce 470,000 tonnes of Propylene oxide each year. Due to the
Gudang,
continuous
Johor Darul consumption
Takzim. of propylene glycol based products, propylene glycol is a
potential
industry to be developed in Malaysia. Hence, we are planning to build a plant in
___________________________________________________________________________
Malaysia to
meet the demand of propylene glycol. With the establishment of this chemical plant in
Dr. Fadzil we
Malaysia, Noor Gunawan
can increase economic growth and create new jobs in the effort to help
reduce
Plant Manager,
unemployment.
JAJAS Chemical Sdn.Bhd. 12th September
4. The targeted location of our proposed Propylene glycol plant was set at Tanjung
2018.
Langsat Industrial Area, Johor Bahru. Tanjung Langsat Industrial Area have all the
essential
features to become a strategic location for our plant production. This location was
confirmed
Dear considering
after Sir, several aspects such as convenient transportation, easy accessibility
of raw
materials, topography, road network, ecology and human health. Tanjung Langsat
Plant Design for the Production of Propylene Glycol
Industrial
Area is located near YTL power generation stations and surrounded by all the utilities
such as
With reference to the above matter, we attached the initial planning of plant design for
water
the supply, sewage management system and port facilities. There are no residential
areas
production of Propylene glycol. Since there is no plant that produces Propylene Glycol in
within 2 km radius from the plant and this will not affect human health. Besides that,
this
Malaysia, this plant design was proposed to build in Malaysia to fulfil the demand and
location
supply is very well connected to Johor Bahru through a four lane Lebuhraya Pasir
Gudang,
required by various type of industrial application. The expected production capacity of
JB East Coast Highway and a trunk road. This strategic location enables us to deliver our
this
plant design will be approximately 60,000 tonnes per year of Propylene glycol. The plant
products efficiently and operate our plant successfully without any
issues.
design for the production of Propylene glycol is mainly from glycerol as a raw material.
5. The production of Propylene Glycol plant is from hydrogenolysis of glycerol using
Besides, the by-products from the productions of Propylene Glycol can be sold to other
Cu-
ZnO as a catalyst after thorough comparison studies of the 3 process alternative that
industry which could help to generate side income for the .
are
company.
available. The glycerol used for this process is pure and it is abundantly available in
2. Propylene glycol is a synthetic organic compound which is stable, colourless and
Malaysia. This process is chosen because it reduces usage of non-renewable resources
and it
odourless. It is known as an excellent solvent because it is freely miscible with water.
is an environmental friendly process.
Propylene glycol has been used for over 50 years in a large variety of applications. It is
6. Our design project included choosing the most suitable alternative process after
generally regarded as a safe chemical by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Thus,
considering the aspect of health, safety, environment (HSE) and profitability. The
Propylene glycol can be considered as a versatile product as it is used in a wide range of
deliverables of this project include production cost, mass balance, energy balance,
consumer products, including food products, pharmaceuticals additive, animal feed and
process
flow diagram, operating condition, reactor sizing and process and equipment
moisturizer in cosmetic products.
optimization.
21
22
Other than that, several criteria were also taken into account such as sustainability,
green
chemistry, proper waste management and less environmental impact. The first half of
this
project consists of three tasks and expected to be completed by the end of December.
Hereby,
we attached a Gantt chart that clearly illustrate our project’s interactive
planning.
7. If there is any doubt, regarding this proposed Propylene Glycol production plant,
please
feel free to contact us. We are very delighted to entertain your enquiries and we hope
that this
design of production Propylene Glycol can meet your expectation. Thank you very much
for
your cooperation and we are eagerly looking forward to hear from you
soon.
Thank You.
Sincerely,
_________________________________ _____________________________
(JOAN MARY A/P PATRICK GEORGE) (SHERRINE A/P ARULDASS)
PLANT DESIGN LEADER TASK 1 PLANT DESIGN MEMBER
H/P NO: 016-4666935 H/P NO: 012-3679508
EMAIL: joan.eicc @gmail.com EMAIL: [email protected]
_____________________________ _____________________________
(NURUL AFINI BINTI FUAD) (LOW YING KAI)
PLANT DESIGN MEMBER PLANT DESIGN MEMBER
H/P NO: 019-4367208 H/P NO: 018-2351268
EMAIL: [email protected] EMAIL: [email protected]
_____________________________
23
1.4 Scope of Project
The plant project is to design a plant that produces propylene glycol in the most
efficient way in terms of safety and environment, economical indicator, market analysis
as
well as flexibility and controllability of the process. Besides that, this project also aims to
design a profitable propylene glycol plant that imposes minimal environmental
impacts.
The method which are used to produce propylene glycol for this plant is by
hydrogenolysis of glycerol using Cu-ZnO catalyst. The deliverables of this process
includes
the selection of the best process alternative for the production of propylene glycol, the
cost of
production and process flow diagram.
The process of the designated plant is chosen based on a few aspects. Firstly, the
raw
material for the process is chosen, the reaction of raw materials in the reactor,
production of
desired product and by-product, separation of product and waste water management
process.
Other than that, we described the chosen process of alternatives in terms of
green
chemistry and sustainability, environmental impact, energy consumption, flexibility of
operation, safety factors, waste management, environment and society. In addition, the
plant
is designed by considering cost saving, environmental issues, public issues, market
analysis,
flexibility and controllability. We also studied and predicted the demand and supply of
the
plant for the next 10 years.
24
1.5 Gantt Chart
Below shows the planning for this
project:
Project Name : Plant Design for the Production of Propylene Glycol
Company Name : JAJAS Chemical Sdn Bhd
Project Manager : Joan Mary a/p Patrick George
WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Task 1
Problem Statement
Process Alternatives
Critical Assessment of the
Process Chosen
Process Synthesis Structure
and Analysis
Process Flow Diagram (PFD)
Task 2
Process Analysis
Material Balances
Energy Balances
Utilities and Wastes
Task 3
Mass Transfer Equipment
Design
Heat Transfer Equipment
Design
Reaction Equipment Design
Auxiliary Equipment Design
25
2.0 Process Alternatives
2.1 Discussion of the process alternatives
The 3 different alternatives of the process scheme for the production of propylene glycol
are
listed as below:
26
Firstly, the glycerol undergoes dehydrogenation process. The hydrogen atoms
are
removed from the glycerol which is catalysed by the enzyme, glycerol dehydrogenase
(glyDH) and dihydroxyacetone produced. The dihydroxyacetone is then catalysed by the
dihydroxyacetone kinase (DHAK) to form dihydroxyacetone phosphate by receiving
[17]
phosphate group from the
phosphoenolpyruvate.
The dihydroxyacetone phosphate is then converted to methylglyoxal by the
action of
methylglyoxal synthase. The conversion of methylglyoxal into propylene glycol occurs
through 2 alternate pathways, one with acetol as intermediate through the reaction of
aldehyde oxidoreductase and glycerol dehydrogenase and the other alternative is with
lactaldehyde as intermediate mediated by glyDH and propylene glycol
reductase. [17]
Figure 6: The E. coli pathways involved in the synthesis of propylene glycol through
fermentation of glycerol. [17]
Process scheme
In this process, the crude glycerol that produced as by-product from the
production of
biofuels is used as the raw material. The crude glycerol is used as the substrate for the
fermentation process to produce propylene glycol. The fermentation is a single batch
process.
The substrate is mixed with genetically engineered E. coli and filled into a digester with
culture medium and operated under airtight condition. Prior to inoculation, oxygen in
the [17]
culture medium is removed by autoclaving to speed up the fermentation The
process.
fermentation is operated at temperature in between 30˚C to 42˚C. [17] The pH of the
culture
27
Crude glycerol from
Mixed with genetic
production of
engineered E. coli
biofuel
medium is controlled to pH 7.5 with NaOH and H2SO4 to ensure that the microorganisms
work at their optimal condition. [18] glycerol
Mixed with genetic
Filled into digester
fromCrude production of with culture
engineered E. coli medium
biofuel
At the end of the fermentation process, the fermented material is removed from
the
digester. The yield of the propylene glycol is 21.3%. [17] Other chemicals such as
succinate, Crude glycerol from Filled into digester
Fermentation
ethanol, lactateand acetate are Mixed with by-products theprocessfermentation
geneticproduced as fromwith culture process.
Further purification is needed to recover the propylene medium
production of
glycol. engineered E. coli
biofuel
Crude glycerol from Filled into digester Fermentation
Mixed with genetic Propylene glycol
production of with culture process
engineered E. coli produced
biofuel medium
Process Scheme
Figure 9: Basic block flow diagram for conversion of glycerol to propylene glycol using
Cu-ZnO catalyst.
29
Figure 10: Basic Process Flow Diagram for Conversion of glycerol to propylene glycol
using Cu-ZnO catalyst.
2.1.3 Hydrogenation of biomass derived lactic acid to propylene glycol over a carbon-
supported ruthenium catalyst.
Lactic acid production from biomass resources is a cheap raw material and it is
commonly produced by fermentation. In 1930s, production of propylene glycol from
lactic
acid was considered to be a viable method. [22] However, it is not viable in today’s world
as it
required high temperature and pressure which leads to high cost. The hydrogenation of
lactic
acid to propylene glycol produces other by-products such as ethylene glycol. [23] These
by-
products will reduce the yield of propylene glycol and contaminate the
product.
The biomass derived lactic acid undergoes hydrogenation to produce propylene
glycol
over a carbon-supported ruthenium catalyst.[24] Hydrogen atoms are introduced during
hydrogenation process.
Figure 11: Conversion of biomass derived lactic acid to propylene glycol. [22]
Process Scheme
30
resultingThe
hydrogen
preparation
stream
of supported
is pressurized
ruthenium
by a compressor.
catalyst involves
Optionally,
several
the
important
feedstock
streamsteps.
Firstly,
and hydrogen
immersestream
all carbon
are heated
supportinovernight
a preheater in atostirred
the desired
mixture
temperature
of HNO 3 andand
H2then
SO4 with
a
passed
volume ratio
through of 3:1. [25]
the reactor bedPlace
in anthe
upward
supports
or downward
in an ovenmanner
at 100°C
to increase
and leavethe
overnight
contact then,
with
catalyst.
wash the The
resultant
gas flow
carbon
can either
in warmbedistilled
concurrent
water
or several
counter-current
times. Thewith
ruthenium
the feedstock
catalyst
on
flow.
various carbons were prepared using incipient wetness impregnation method followed
by The passivated catalyst is introduced into the reactor and re-reduced with
drying hydrogen
at 100°C. The Ru loading is set at 5wt% for all catalyst. [25] The dried powder was
stream without the feedstock stream for about 1 hour under a pressure of about 1.7MPa
calcined at 500°C for a duration of 4hours. Before being exposed to air, the catalysts
(250psig).
are then To ensure complete catalyst reduction, a volume of hydrogen (STP) equal to
50
passivated in N2 for a duration of 30minutes after cooling. Detail analyses were carried
times
out onvolume catalyst is used. The re-reduction of catalyst takes place in the reactor.
After
all there-
synthesized catalysts. Using X-ray diffraction analysis, the crystallinity of the
reduction, the reactor is allowed to cool to below 150°C and vented to low pressure. [24]
Then,
synthesized samples was analysed. To examine the surface morphologies and Ru
the feed stream is introduced in mixture with hydrogen stream into the reactor. The rate
particle
of
sizes, a transmission electron microscope was used. Using BET method, the surface area
feed
of stream is adjusted so that it gives a weight hourly space velocity of approximately
0.5g-
the synthesized catalyst was determined, and the pore volumes and average pore sizes
5g
werelactic acid per gram catalyst per hour. The molar ratio of hydrogen to lactic acid feed
is
calculated using BJH model.
preferably about 4.2:1. The temperature of reaction is preferably around 150 to 700°C.
The
hydrogen pressure is increased to a desired value; preferably between 3.4MPA to
10.3MPa
(500 to 1500 psig). [23]
After the reaction, the reactor effluent stream is cooled to below 40°C in a heat
exchanger against a suitable fluid such as water and/or other process stream that needs
heating. For instance, a process hydrogen stream. The cooled effluent stream is passed
through a gas-liquid separator where the fluid is separated into an overhead gas stream
a
bottom liquid stream. In the overhead stream consists mainly of hydrogen and some
methane.
After passing through the gas-liquid separator, the overhead stream undergoes pressure
reduction and is passed through a hydrogen purification unit where the gas is purified to
about 90% volume hydrogen and recycled back to the reactor through a
Figure 12: [24]
compressor. Process Flow Diagram for Conversion of lactic acid to propylene glycol.
33
2.2 Comparison between Process Alternatives
Reaction
34
Purity of
Propylene Glycol N/A (Depends on separation
method)
Yield of Propylene
21.30%[16] 80.00%[40] 74.00%
Glycol
Energy Consumption
High energy consumption: For
Energy Low energy consumption: For High energy consumption: The pre-treatment and purification
consumption for production of propylene glycol. process takes place at high of
reaction to High energy consumption: For temperature. lactic acid feedstock and
occurred inoculation of culture medium. process
occurs at high temperature and
pressure
Flexibility and Controllability
Temperature flexibility: The
Temperature flexibility: No Temperature flexibility: No reaction is carried out at a
temperature flexibility as the temperature flexibility as the temperature preferably between
process takes place at specific process about 150 to 350° C.[24]
temperature. High temperature takes place at specific temperature Pressure flexibility: The hydrogen
will cease the microorganism to pressure is increased to a desired
Flexibility and value, usually 3.4 to 16.5 MPa (500
activity achieve high yield of the desired
controllability of PSIG to 2,400 PSIG), and
Pressure flexibility: The product.
reaction
pressure must be low. Pressure flexibility: No pressure preferably between 3.4 MPa to
Output flexibility: The process flexibility as the process takes place 10.3
produced other useful by- at specific pressure to achieve high MPa (500 to 1,500 PSIG) to obtain
products. yield of the desired product. desired yield of the product. [24]
Output flexibility: The process Output flexibility: The process
produced other useful by-products. produces other useful by-products.
Environmental Impacts
Providing alternative route to Providing alternative route to Providing alternative route to
Positive impacts sustainable production of sustainable production of propylene sustainable production of
propylene glycol as the raw glycol as the raw material is supplied propylene
glycol as the raw material is
35
material is supplied by by- by by-product of the production of biomass derived.
product of the production of biodiesel. There are no greenhouse
biodiesel. There are no greenhouse gasses gasses
No metallic catalyst used in the being released to environment being released to environment
process. through the process. through the process.
There are no greenhouse
gasses
being released to environment
through the process.
Large amountsofchemical
Large amounts of chemical might
Fermentation fluid might leak effluents used to control pH (e.g.
leak from the reactor to the
Negative impacts from the bioreactor and cause calcium sulphate) produced and
surrounding and cause water
water pollution. might leak to environment and
pollution.
cause water pollution. [23]
Safety Factors
Lactic acid is very hazardous in
case of skin contact since it causes
irritation, burning sensation and
Reactor operate under high blistering. [22]
Reactor operate under low Under high temperature, lactic acid
temperature that might cause fire
temperature and pressure that may be combustible.
incident to happen.
Hazard/Health prevent explosion incident. Ruthenium is highly toxic and can
Reactor operate under high
Issue Proper handling of inoculation increase risk of cancer as it is
pressure
process to prevent hazard carcinogenic. [25]
that might cause explosion incident
happened on workers. Reactor operate under high
to happen.
temperature and pressure that
might
cause fire and explosion incident to
happen.
Waste Management
Water Calcium Sulphate
Waste produced Water
Culture medium waste Water
36
Use a shovel to dispose the waste
and dispose it into a convenient
Wastewater treatment plant waste disposal container.
2.3 Choice of Process
needed to treat the Keep away the waste from static
wastewater Wastewater treatment plant discharge since calcium sulphate
Waste handling before releasing
2.4 Current related problemto the of the plant to the environment and
needed is
environment.
society Culture medium waste must to treat the wastewater before
releasing to theand
environment.
slightly explosive when there is
Propylene glycol is highly
send for treatment before soluble in water, is readily metabolized
presence ofby microbes
heat. [25]
Wastewater treatment plant
and dispose to the environment. needed
other higher[27]
organisms when emancipated to the environment. The biodegradation
to treat the wastewater before
process releasing to the environment.
requires oxygen. Hence, dissolved oxygen concentration in receiving water may be
adversely
affected following a glycol release. Rapid glycol biodegradation may cause a bacterial
biomass
build-up around solid particles.
[30]
Moreover, propylene glycol does not volatilize readily into air from water as it has
high
solubility and low vapour pressure. When released into the atmosphere while at high
temperatures, propylene glycol exists as vapour phase and undergoes photochemical
oxidation
rapidly. The estimated lifetime for this reaction is about 20-32
hours. [30]
Despite the fact that the direct toxicity of propylene glycol is relatively low, it can
affect
aquatic life periphrastically because propylene glycols need oxygen to biodegrade. This
may
increase aquatic toxicity as a consequence of the anaerobic conditions at warm water
conditions.
[30]
37
Propylene glycol which is widely used cosmetic, food and pharmaceutical products
aids
the body to absorb chemicals more effectively. Propylene glycol is not a bioaccumulative
chemical. Hence, under typical dosage or exposure levels, propylene glycol breaks down
in the
body within a time span of 48 hours in individuals with kidneys and liver with good
condition
and does not build-up in the body to create toxicity in the body. Propylene glycol is used
in many
intravenous medications, including Lorazepam; a medication used to treat anxiety and
seizure
treatment. Lorazepam is often prescribed to patients with substantial burns as a
tranquilizer
during treatment or to patients with mental illness. Over a long period of time; in large
doses, it
can develop kidney problems in humans.
[31]
38
and the available supply of the feedstock. According to research, the global propylene
glycol
production was around 2.18 million tonnes in 2013. [32] The production of propylene
glycol at
Asia Pacific called for almost 40% of the total capacity.[32] The overall propylene glycol
market
is anticipated to grow around 4.5% per year in the upcoming
years. [33]
39
Table 3: Rough calculation for plant capacity for production of propylene
glycol.
Proposed plant capacity = 60,000 tonnes per year
Proposed plant output rate = 7.10 tonnes per hour
Number of working days per year = 352 days (13 days annual
Number of working hours per day maintenance)
Number of working hours per shift= 24 hours
= 12 hours
From table 4, it shows that the proposed plant capacity is feasible when the
production
run in 2 shifts per day and each shift is 12 hours working hour. The number of working
days per
year is 352 days excluding 13 days annual
maintenance.
3.1.2 Location of the designed plant
The location of the plant is important and must fulfil certain requirement before
being
established. Those criteria including the availability and accessibility of the raw material,
logistics and transportation, utilities supply, environmental considerations and also
product
output marketing. Tanjung Langsat Industrial Area is located near YTL power generation
stations and surrounded by all the utilities such as water supply, sewage management
system and
port facilities. There are no residential areas within 2 km radius from the plant and this
will not
affect human health. After deep consideration, the location of the plant for the
production of
propylene glycol will be established at Tanjung Langsat Industrial Area,
Johor.
Plant Location
40
Table
The State 4: Palm oil of
Government plantation
Johor setarea in Malaysia
up centre by Johor
such as state State
(2016).Investment
Centre[36]
(JSIC) that facilitates and provides services for investor to invest in the board sector of
Palm oil plantation area in Malaysia by state (2016)
industries.[39] This mayPlantation
contribute areaPercentage of totalPercentage
for the production of state
plant future development. Besides,
State the (hectares)plantation area (%)area (%)
utilities supply such as 1electricity supply which provided by Tenaga Nasional Berhad
551 71427.021.1
(TNB)Sabah 1 506 76926.312.1
whileSarawak
the water supply which provided by the Syarikat Air Johor Berhad (SAJ) are readily
745 63013.038.8
Johor 732 05212.820.3
available at Tanjung Langsat Industrial
Pahang 397 9086.918.9
Area.
Perak 178 transportation,
9583.126.8
NegeriFor Sembilan
the logistics and Tanjung Langsat Industrial area is
approximately 171
2.1 9433.013.2
Terengganu
km away from the Tanjung155 Langsat
4582.710.3
Port (TLP). The TLP is a port that provide accessibility
to Kelantan 138 8312.417.1
Selangor
the centre of distribution87for7861.533.7
the finished goods from the plant. The finished goods can be
easilyKedah 56 1491.013.5
distributed
Melakato all parts of14 Malaysia and event export to other
countries. 1350.29.2
Penang 6520.00.8
3.1.3 Complete
Perlis Process Description
The chosen process for the production of propylene glycol is the hydrogenolysis of
glycerol to propylene glycol using Cu-ZnO catalyst. The production plant using the
process
mainlyAccording
involves dehydration,
to the data, hydrogenation,
the state of Johor vapor-liquid
comprisedseparation
of 745,630and distillation.
hectares of oil The
palm
process
plantationusing
area. refined
38.8%glycerol as raw
of the state material
land of the
are being production.
occupied Hence,
as the no plantation
oil palm pre-
treatment
area. Due to of raw
material neededoftooilbe
the abundance carried
palm out. Thecompany
plantation, raw material
that can be obtained
process directly from the
and manufacture
supplier.
oleochemical can
The process
be easily found proposed
in Johor.are discussed
These companyin such as Pacific Oleochemicals Sdn. Bhd. and
detail.
Vance
Bioenergy Sdn. Bhd. refine and supply refined glycerol. According to Vance Bioenergy
I. Dehydration of glycerol
Sdn.
Bhd., the company has two of the largest single standing glycerol refineries in Asia
production
The raw material, glycerol is fed into a packed [37] bed reactor which packed with Cu-
40,000 metric tons of refined glycerol per annum. The refined glycerol is the major raw
ZnO
catalyst. The reactor operated at temperature of 200˚C and pressure of 4.2MPa. The
material
pressure foris the production of propylene glycol plant. The Tanjung Langsat Industrial
Area is
built up by flowing hydrogen gas into the reactor. The glycerol will be dehydrated to
within the vicinity of the companies that supply the refined glycerol. Hence the raw
acetol
material for
(hydroxyacetone) and water will be produced as by-product. The acetol is an
the production plant is readily
intermediate of the
available.
hydrogenolysis process of glycerol to form propylene
glycol. As Johor state has abundant of food manufacturing companies which have larger
II. Hydrogenation of Acetol
production such as Kinos Food Industries (M) Sdn. Bhd., Bumi Hijau Food Industries Sdn.
Bhd.
and Frezfruta
The acetol Food inIndustries
the packed Sdn.
bedBhd., theare
reactor finished goods ofundergoes
then quickly the production of
hydrogenation in
propylene
the
glycol
reactor.plant
The can be suppliedprocess
hydrogenation to the companies.
is catalysedThe by propylene
the Cu-ZnO glycol is often
catalyst in theused to
reactor. As
maintain
the the
moisture
dehydration in prepared
of glycerol foods
and and also in foodof acetol occurred in the same reactor, the
hydrogenation
colouring.
operating [38]
temperature and pressure of the reactor is the same which is 200˚C and 4.2MPa. The
hydrogen
gas that used to build up the pressure in the reactor are now acted as the source of
hydrogen atom
41
42
to the hydrogenation of acetol. The acetol molecules reacted with the hydrogen gas to
form
propylene glycol.
The product mixture from reactor is feed into the flash drum to separate the vapor
and
liquid in the product mixture. The flash drum with operating temperature of 336˚C and
operating
pressure of 40 bar. The flash drum is to separate the unreacted hydrogen gas from the
product
mixture from the reactor. The leftover product mixture then transfers to a series of
distillation
columns.
The product mixture from the flash drum undergoes a series of distillation
columns to
purify out the propylene glycol with purity of >98.0wt%. Other by-product such as
ethylene
glycol, methanol, acetol, water and unreacted glycerol are separated out from the
product
mixture through the distillation
columns.
3.2 Process Chemistry, Reactions, Kinetics, Thermodynamics Data & Other Physical
and
Chemical Properties Data
Glycerol and Cu-ZnO catalyst are fed into the reactor which operating
temperature is
200℃.. The catalyst will be packed in the reactor and catalysed the dehydration of
glycerol.
43
Large amount of hydrogen gas will be fed into the reactor to build up the operating
pressure to
4.2MPa. The glycerol will be dehydrated to produce acetol and water in this
reaction.
CH2OH-CHOH-CH2OH (l) → CH2OH-CO-CH3 (l) + H2O (l)
In the same reactor, the acetol produced from the dehydration of glycerol will
undergoes
hydrogenation to form propylene glycol. The acetol will react with hydrogen to form
propylene
glycol. The reactor operated under same operating temperature and pressure which are
200˚C
and 4.2MPa. Some of the unreacted glycerol will undergoes hydrogenation to form
ethylene
glycol and methanol. The ethylene glycol and methanol are the by-product of the
process.
CH2OH-CO-CH3 (l) + H2 (g) → CH2OH-CHOH-CH3 (l)
3.2.2 Reactions
Mechanism of hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene
glycol
I. Dehydration of glycerol to acetol
Side reaction:
CH2OH-CHOH-CH2OH (l) + H2 (g) → CH2OH-CH2OH (l) + CH3OH (l)
44
the active site of the catalyst while the hydrogen will adsorb on the other type of the
active site of
the catalyst. The organic molecules are glycerol, acetol and propylene
glycol.
The θ1 denote the active sites for hydrogen adsorption while θ2 denote the active
sites for
organic molecules adsorption. The bH, bG, bA and bp are the adsorption constants of
hydrogen,
glycerol, acetol and propylene glycol respectively. [1] The rate constants of glycerol
dehydration
to acteol is denoted as k1 while the rate constant of acetol hydrogenation to propylene
glycol is
denoted as k2[40]
. By assuming steady-state condition for the adsorbed intermediates, the
rate
expression for the dehydration of glycerol, r1 and hydrogenation of acetol, r2 can be
derived.
The kinetic model can be used as the basis for the design of the reactor for the
hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene
glycol.
45
3.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of
Process
For designing this plant, we choose Alternative 2 as the main route for the
production of
propylene glycol. This is because we considered the advantages and disadvantages
criteria of this
alternative based on literature review. The criteria are considered in terms of raw
material,
catalyst, reaction, by-product and purification. Raw material is very important when
designing
our plant because it will reflect the yield that we can obtain from the process selected. A
pure
glycerol is chosen as our raw material. Besides, choosing the right type of catalyst is
crucial
since catalyst will affect the conversion and selectivity of the reaction. In addition, the
formation
of by-product in the chosen process also can be sold to other company since most of the
by-
product formed have its own function in industrial applications. Moreover, purification
process
by using distillation column as a unit operation in this process enables us to produce
propylene
glycol with higher purity.
However, there are also some disadvantages for the chosen process. But, the
advantages
outweigh the disadvantages. Thus, the table 8 below shows the criteria that we had
consider for
the production of propylene glycol from
glycerol.
Table 5: Advantages and disadvantage of hydrogenolysis of propylene glycol from
glycerol
No. Aspect AdvantagesDisadvantages
Raw High yield by using highly pure
1. material High cost for high purity glycerol.
glycerol.
The solid catalyst does not mix with
2. Cu: ZnO ratio must be at 1: 1 to
Catalystany reactants or product; thus, no
achieve high selectivity.
catalyst separation is required.
3. Further increase in temperature will
Water content in glycerol will not
cause excessive hydrogenolysis
[62]
Reactionaffect the catalyst. No water
which will increase the production of
4. content is required at feed.
by-product.
The by-product produced such as
ethylene glycol can be selling to other
The methanol is hazardous while the
4. company. Acetol is a good
By-productwastewater needs to be treated before
intermediate which will be use as
discharge or reuse the wastewater.
monomer in polyols manufactured
46
industry.
The unit operation such as distillation
Purification column is needed to produce highly The equipment capital cost is high.
purified product.
3.4 Environmental (disposal of waste, if any), Safety and Health
Concerns
In this propylene glycol production plant, environmental, safety and health
concerns as
well as waste management are the most important aspect. These aspect are important
to be
considered since governments and regulatory agencies have tighten the environmental
regulations recently. Propylene glycol is generally regarded as a safe chemical by U.S.
Food and
Drug Administration (FDA). Hence, there are no major threat to all living and non-living
things
in this environment by the production of this plant. For environmental aspect, proper
waste
management and 3R’s (Reduce, Reuse and Recycle) elements must be considered so
that it does
give a negative impact to the environment. Besides, safety is very crucial in designing a
plant
because human loss and suffering is immeasurable. All the employees must follow the
Standard
Operating Procedures (SOP) of the production plant. Hence, it is important to consider all
these
aspect so that a safe working environment is created and this could help to minimize the
hazard
which can result in illness and injury. The table 9 below shows the environmental, safety
and
health concerns and waste management of the propylene glycol
plant.
Table 6: Environmental, Safety and Health Concerns
Aspect Concern
47
3.6 Projected Demands/Supply
Due to allfor Next
this 10 Years
hazard, the plant will be equipped with eye wash
facility,
The Dow Chemical safety showerand
Company andLyondellBasell
the employeesIndustries
will be given
are personal
the most protective
influential
equipment.
players in the propylene glycol
Plant industry
manager willwith
taketheir propylene-oxide
in charge of educating based capacity
the employees
accounting for regarding
approximately 29% and 15% of world capacity. There are Dow plants in the United
States, nature of chemical exposed and how to conduct first aid measures
western Europe, Brazil, inAustralia and Thailand and a new joint venture in Saudi Arabia
while case of any emergency.
there a LyondellBasell plants in United States and Western
Glycerol used as raw material in this process is flammable. It may
Europe. [63]
be
The most significant end useatofhigh
combustible propylene glycol is
temperature. unsaturated
Hence, polyester
appropriate resins;
firefighting
mainly Hydrogen
equipmentgas andused in thissupply
firewater process
willisbe
lowprepared.
pressure Employees
and it will bemust
in China and other developing
recycled
wear countries.
back to the Instream.
2016, this segment has contributed almost
41% of By-product waste such as methanol generated should be handled
Waste
consumption personal
in the major protective
worldandregions. equipment
The demand throughout
ofcompanies.
propylene the plantisoperation.
glycol mostly due
properly can be sold to other
Management
to the
regional construction Water which
industry is produced
trends as waste
and the overall canof
health belocal
dispose of easilyItsince
economies. is it
expected that is a
the propylene glycol market
benignwill rate at a rate of 3% annually for this segment.
product.
According to the
forecast, it is expected that high growth rates are to occur in China, Asia and Central and
Eastern
3.5 Similar Plant with Plant Capacity and Total Capital Investment
Europe.
Currently, there are no propylene glycol plant available in Malaysia. But,
Propylene
productionglycol
of is also used as functional fluids, polyurethanes, paints and
Propylene Glycol is active in international regions such as Texas, Germany, Japan,
coatings
which contribute about 30% of usage in the major world regions in 2016. For this
Singapore
and manythe
segment, more. Propylene glycol is a colorless and odorless liquid and it does not cause
growth
major rate is expected to grow about 2.0%
threat to human health and environment. Because of this unique properties, propylene
annually.
glycol is
used inAlthough
a varietyonly for a small percentage,
of applications in industrial the antifreeze
scale. marketIndustries
LyondellBasell which comprises
N.V is a of
engine
coolants and de-icing
multinational chemicalfluids. Propylene
company which glycol is alsoproducer
is a leading used in North Americaglycol
of propylene and Western
and it is
Europe
as a solvent for in
headquartered liquid
Houston, Texas. High quality of propylene glycol are being produced by
detergent
this
company to meet the demand of this product. The capacity of their plant is 250,000
Other additional minor uses of propylene glycol display differing degrees of
tonnes per
growth.
year and In
their total capital investment to build the plant is 20,000,000 USD. Besides,
the United States, the markets with the most influential growth prospect are paints and
Dow
coatings,
Chemical Company is also another plant that produces propylene glycol at its Stade
functional fluids, and personal care products. In Western Europe, the growth prospect is
plant in
Germany by 280,000 tonnes per year with a total capital investment of more than
promising for food, personal care, and pharmaceutical
24,000,000
usage.
USD.
The demand is greatly affected by the current economy. For instance, the
utilization
Table 7: of
Similar Plant with Plant Capacity and Total Capital Investment
propylene glycol for the production of unsaturated polyester resins dwindled by 22% per
year in Capacity (tonne/ Total Investment
the United
Company States and 7% in Western
Plant LocationEurope as a consequence of the depreciation in the
year) Cost (USD)
construction
Dow Chemical and industrial markets during 2008-
2009. Stade, Germany. 280,000 24,750,000 USD
Company
LyondellBasell
Industries N.V Houston, Texas 250,000 20,000,000 USD
48
49
According to research, it is reported that the global propylene glycol production
was
around 2.18 million in 2013 and the overall propylene glycol market is expected to grow
at a rate
of 4.5% per year in the forecast period.
[64]
4.1 Input-Output Structure with Feed and Specifications, Price of all product, By-product
and Raw Materials.
The input-output structure shows the flow of the feedstock into the unit operations
in the
production plant. It also shows the products flow in the production plant and also the
operating
details of the unit
operations.
50
Table 8: Input-Output Structure.
51
Operating details of the unit
operation
Feed Product
Packed bed Reactor Unreacted Glycerol
Glycerol (Cu-ZnO catalyst) Unreacted Hydrogen
Hydrogen 200˚C , 4.2MPa Propylene Glycol
Ethylene Glycol
Methanol
Water
The pH adjusted glycerol is then feed into the packed bed reactor which packed
with Cu-
ZnO as the catalyst. Excess hydrogen gas is supply into the reactor. The reactor
operates with
200˚C and 4.2MPa. This is because the high operating temperature will favour the
adsorption
and transformation of the reaction intermediates and hence increases the propylene
glycol
selectivity.[19][20] The high operating pressure is built up by feeding hydrogen gas. The
fresh Cu-
ZnO catalyst will be pre-reduced by the hydrogen stream to avoid the water effects on
the
aggregation of Cu particles in situ formed in the reaction solution. [19] The product
produced are
the propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, methanol and water. The unreacted glycerol and
hydrogen
gas are being discharged together with the product
stream.
Feed Product
Unreacted Glycerol Flash Drum Unreacted Glycerol
Unreacted Hydrogen 336˚C, 40 Bar Propylene Glycol
Propylene Glycol Ethylene Glycol
Ethylene Glycol Methanol
Methanol Water
Water
Unreacted Hydrogen
The effluent of the packed bed reactor which consist of unreacted glycerol,
unreacted
hydrogen, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, methanol and water are then fed into flash
drum.
The flash drum is used to separate the liquid mixture and the unreacted hydrogen gas at
operating
temperature of 336˚C and 40 bar. Before selecting the operating condition, the phase
diagram of
52
every components in the product mixture are studied. [50][41][54][41][56][58][49] At this
operating
condition, only hydrogen remain in gas phase while other components are in liquid
phase. The
effluent product mixture of the flash drum is then left with unreacted glycerol, propylene
glycol,
methanol and water.
Feed Product
Unreacted Glycerol Distillation Column 1 Unreacted Glycerol
Propylene Glycol 147˚C, 1 bar Propylene Glycol
Ethylene Glycol Ethylene Glycol
Methanol
Water
Methanol
Water
Acetol
The liquid mixture from flash drum is then fed into distillation column that operate
at
147˚C and 1 bar. At 1 bar, the boiling point of the methanol, water and acetol are lower
than 147
˚C.[56][50][49] This is to separate out methanol and water from the liquid mixture. The
distillate that
consist methanol and water are then transfer to another distillation column for further
separation.
Feed Product
Unreacted Glycerol Distillation Column Propylene Glycol
2
Propylene Glycol 198˚C, 1 bar
Ethylene Glycol
Ethylene Glycol
Unreacted Glycerol
The liquid mixture with unreacted glycerol, propylene glycol and ethylene glycol is
then
fed into distillation column that operate at 198˚C and 1 bar. At 1 bar, the boiling point of
the
propylene glycol and ethylene glycol are lower than198˚C.[59][41] The unreacted glycerol
is
53
separated out from the mixture as bottom product. The unreacted glycerol is collected
and
transferred to company that able to refine
glycerol.
Feed Product
Propylene Glycol Distillation Column Propylene Glycol
3
Ethylene Glycol
189˚C, 1 bar
Ethylene Glycol
The mixture of propylene glycol and ethylene glycol will not form azeotrope. [65]
The
propylene glycol and ethylene glycol mixture is fed into distillation column that operate
at 189˚C
and 1 bar. At 1 bar, the boiling point of propylene glycol is lower than189˚C.[59]
Separation of
the propylene glycol from ethylene glycol take place and the propylene glycol with lower
boiling
point will be collected as the
distillate.
4.1.2 Feed and product
specification
The feed and product specification shows the details of the components
in table.
Table 9: Feed and Product Specification.
Cu:ZnO
Cu-ZnO Solid
1:1
54
4.1.3 Price of all product, by product and raw materials
The price of all raw material, by products and products are stated in the table
below:
Table 10: Price of Raw Materials, By Products and Products
Price Price
Raw Materials
(USD/Metric Tonnes) (RM/Metric Tonnes)
Refined glycerol 950[66] 3800
Hydrogen* 530[84] 2120
Price Price
By Product
(USD/Metric Tonnes) (RM/Metric Tonnes)
Ethylene Glycol 1200[67] 4800
Acetol 1100[68] 4400
[69]
Methanol 1980
495
Water 9.04
2.26
Price
Price
Product
(USD/Metric Tonnes) (RM/Metric Tonnes)
Propylene Glycol 1550[70] 6200
Price Price
Catalyst (USD/Metric Tonnes) (RM/Metric Tonnes)
900[71] 3600
Cu-ZnO
*Hydrogen is sell in compressed
liquid.
Plant Economic Potential
The plant economic potential show the calculation of gross profit margin of the
production plant.
Table 11: Basis and cost calculation for the designed
plant.
BasisPriceTotal Cost
Component
(MT/year)(USD/MT)(USD/year)
Glycerol89118.50950.0084662576.69
hydrogen2000.00530.001060000.00
Acetol750.591100.00825649.97
Propylene Glycol60000.001550.0093000000.00
Ethylene Glycol1414.971200.001697958.29
Methanol730.30495.00361500.80
Water14210.53
* Basis of calculation: Overall yield of 81.5% of propylene glycol which is 60000 MT/year.
No
revenue generated from water as water are not sold out. Catalyst price, plant
construction cost,
operational cost and maintenance cost are
omitted.
55
Estimated Annual Cost of = USD 825649.97/year + USD
93000000.00/year
Products + USD 1697958.29/year + USD
361500.80/year
= USD 95885109.05/year
= 10.60%
The gross profit margin of the production plant is 10.60%. The gross profit margin of the
plant
fall in the range of profit margins of the chemicals sector. The range of the profit margin
in the
chemicals sector is between 9% and 14% and the average profit margin is
approximately 12%.[73
56
Table 12: Destination of Codes and Component Classification
Ethylene
By Product
Glycol
57
Pump P-401
Reboiler E-203
Reboiler E-403
Condenser E-302
Condenser E-103
Distillation Column 1 V-201
Flash Drum V-101
Reflux Drum V-201
Heat Exchanger E-102
Heat Exchanger E-201
Heat Exchanger E-502
Heat Exchanger E-602
Acetol By Product
Packed bed reactor R-101
Expander D-101
Flash Drum V-101
Distillation Column 1 V-201
Reflux Drum V-202
Heat Exchanger E-104
Heat Exchanger E-201
Condenser E-103
Condenser E-202
Expander D-101
Packed bed reactor R-101
Methanol By Product Flash Drum V-101
Distillation Column 1 V-201
Reflux Drum V-202
Heat Exchanger E-104
Heat Exchanger E-201
Condenser E-103
Condenser E-202
Expander D-101
Packed bed reactor R-101
Water By Product
4.2.2 Utilities
Utilities are required by any chemical plant to ensure the processes are carried out
smoothly.
Utilities are neither reactants nor products; they are required for sustaining suitable
conditions
of a manufacturing unit.
58
i. Electricity
Electricity is the most significant utility for the propylene glycol production
plant
as electricity is needed to run pumps such as P-101, P-301 and P-401. It is
also
used for maintenance and to control the system if the process. The plant also
makes use of many high voltage equipment for production such as V-201, V-
301
and V-401 which operated at high temperature. A backup electricity generator
station which can supply 2000kW is installed for emergency
use.
ii. Water
Water which is a cheap, used in heat exchangers as a coolant due to its good
cooling properties and abundance. Since water is one of the by-products of
the
process, it can be recycled from the plant to the operating equipment. It is
non-
hazardous, thus making it able to be disposed without any further
treatment.
iii. Steam
Steam is used for heating in the process in heat exchanger(E-101, E-102, E-
104,
E-201, E-301, E-401) Steam is also used to heat the incoming glycerol and
hydrogen streams to the reactor, R-101 inlet temperature and the reboiler for
distillation column
The block diagram, process synthesis flow sheet and process flow diagram give better
picture
on the flow of the production of propylene
glycol.
59
5.2 Process Synthesis Flow Sheet
Figure 17: Process Synthesis Flow Sheet for Production of Propylene Glycol
product.
heating
the
office
Hence,
supply.
and
From
The
water
green
solar
ofmedium
the
this
Moreover,
Instead
the
are
energy
production
cell
solar
production
insulated
system
of
for
cell
that
another
transferring
the
system
of
so
does
is
heat
plant.
propylene
proposed
that
advantage
not
exchanger
isThis
no
the
arelease
good
heat
system
water
as
glycol
of
backup
loss
approach
used
greenhouse
using
toin
uses
from
waste
our
insupply
this
this
solar
the
plant,
when
water
system
process.
water
cell
electricity
there
water
treatment,
panel
to
is The
is
the
is
themalfunction
released
as
for
system
pipeline
athe
itmedium
canis
as
used
be
in
a to
by-
to
ii. Solar
reused
transfer
surrounding.
heat
absorb
electricity
renewable
gases.
administration
cell
from
as
system
asunlight and generate electricity which then stored for backup purpose. 60
5.4 Process Flow Diagram (PFD)
63
heat exchanger where one flow through the tube wall and another from tube side
to
shell side. All the heat exchanger which are required for this plant must undergo
consistent maintenance and cleaning to prevent tubes fouling. The heat
exchanger is
placed in horizontal position so that the coils from can be easily drawn out for
cleaning process. This will help to reduce the maintenance cost as well as save
space
in the plant.
64
65
66
6.2.2 Reboiler
There are reboilers used in this plant since we have distillation columns. A
kettle type reboiler are used because they are very reliable and easy to maintain.
[90]
Reboiler is used to provide heat at the bottom of industrial distillation column .
Liquid from the distillation column are passed into the shell consist of horizontal
tube
bundle where boiling takes place outside of the bundle. Any vapor produced are
passed back to the column and the liquid by-product drops to the bottom of the
kettle
reboiler. Steam will flow through the tube bundle and exits as condensate while
the [91]
liquid from the bottom of the tower flows through the shell side . Moreover, the
separation efficiency of this reboiler approaches one theoretical stage and it very
stable in operation. This is very significant as its role as a reboiler at distillation
column
67
68
6.2.3 Compressor
69
Table 15 Justification on the Compressor and Material Construction
70
column from bottom. The main purpose of distillation equipment is to establish
an
intimate contact between ascending vapor and descending liquid and hence the
mass
transfer occurs [95]. In the production of propylene glycol from glycerol, the
distillation column is used to separate the propylene glycol from other by-
products.
The figure 4 show the basic distillation column that used in
industry.
71
72
6.2.5 Packed Bed Reactor
Figure 23: Basic Packed Bed Reactor that used in industry [97].
Packed bed reactor is one of the most common reactors used in industry
due to
their high conversion rate per catalyst weight compared to other catalytic
reactors [98].
Multiphase reactions such as three-phase reaction which gas and liquid phases in
contacted with solid catalyst can be operated in packed bed reactor. The solid
catalyst
is packed in the reactor while the raw material is fed into the reactor. In the
production of propylene glycol, the hydrogenolysis of glycerol involved 2 phases
of
raw material which the glycerol is in liquid phase and the hydrogen is in gas
phase.
The solid Cu-ZnO catalyst is packed in the reactor. The figure 5 shows the basic
packed bed reactor that used in
industry.
73
Table 17 Justification on the Packed Bed Reactor and Material Construction
74
6.2.6 Pumps
In this plant, there are 4 pumps in total that we use to transfer fluids. The
type
of pump that be used in this plant is centrifugal pump. Centrifugal pumps are the
most
common type of pump being used in industry as they are compact, inexpensive,
[104]
robust, and available in a wide range of . A shaft connects the impeller
materials
to a power source such as an electric motor or steam turbine, which causes the
impeller to rotate at high speed. The motor in the casing will act on the liquid to
produce high velocity head that will converted to pressure when the liquid leaves
the [105]
pump . The design is less expensive and more suitable to use with impeller of
different size. This equipment needs to be sealed to avoid leakage. It also needed
where a rotating shaft passes through the wall of a vessel or casing of a pump.
We use
mechanical seal as a smooth metal surface is slide on each other. Centrifugal
pump is [105]
widely being use as it is simple in construction . Figure 7 shows centrifugal pump
that usually being used in
industry.
75
Table 18 Justification on the Centrifugal Pump and Material Construction
76
6.2.7 Reflux drum
In this plant, reflux drum is use in distillation column. Liquid drum is placed
horizontally at the distillation column and its role is to hold he condensed liquid
coming from condenser [105]. Reflux drum is also known as receiver (from
condenser).
Some of the liquid will be recycle back to the top of distillation column and some
may
leave as condensate. However, the amount of reflux that will return to the
distillation
column is one of our main concern. Therefore, the control of drum level is
important
to avoid unwanted consequence during operating the reflux drum such as
product
degradation or expensive maintenance. Figure 7 shows the illustration of reflux
drum.
77
Table 19 Justification on the Reflux Drum and Material Construction
78
6.2.8 Flash Drum
79
horizontal flash drum[111]. Figure 8 shows the flash drum that usually used in the
chemical plant industry.
304
6.2.9 Condenser
80
In the distillation column, the vapor generated at the top of distillation
column
returned as liquid form into the column because the condenser will remove heat
to [114]
convert from vapor phase to liquid phase by cooling it down . The condenser is
designed to be in horizontal orientation because it gives higher heat transfer rate
between the fluids. Therefore, condenser with horizontal orientation is chosen in
the
chemical plant production [115].
81
82
6.2.10 Expander
83
Table 22 Justification on the Expander and Material Construction
84
6.2.11 Number of Equipment Units Required
Table 23 Number of equipment units required
Hydrogen 2120
85
6.4.2 Input and Output Structure without Recycle
The input output diagram without recycle stream is shown in the block
diagram above. The production plant of propylene glycol used refined glycerol
and
hydrogen as raw material to produce propylene glycol as the product of the
production plant. Throughout the production plant, the by-products such as
Ethylene
glycol, methanol, water and acetol are produced. However, the amount of by-
products
produced are relatively small when compared to the desired product, propylene
glycol. Hence, the calculation excluded the small amount of the by-products. The
economics potential of the production plant is calculated
as:
Economic Potential(RM/year) = [Total product(RM/year) + Total by-product(RM/year)] –
Total reactants(RM/year)
Propylene
Glycerol Hydrogen Economics
Conversion glycol Total reactant Total product
feed feed Potential
(%) produced (RM/year) (RM/year)
(ton/year) (ton/year) (RM/hr)
(ton/year)
86
90.00 92759.04 10137.60 66232.32 346148352.00 410640384.00 64492032.00
87
From figure
Table 26 Economics 31, as the
Potential recycle percentage
of Production increased,
Plant of Propylene the economics
Glycol at Different
potentialRecycle Percentages
of the production plant increased. In the production of propylene glycol, the
reactions
required hydrogen gas as rawPropylene
material and it is feed in excess amount into the
reactor.
RecycleUnreacted
Glycerol Hydrogen
hydrogen glycol
gas will be separated from the products and recycled Economics
back
into
Percentage feed However,
the reactor. feed it is impossible
produced Total reactant
to recycle Total
100.0% of the product
hydrogen Potential
gas,
some of
(%) (ton/year)
the hydrogen gas (ton/year)
will be purge(ton/year)
out from the(RM/year)
plant as purge(RM/year) (RM/hr)
gas. The recycle
0.00 92759.04
percentage 10137.60
is chose 60000.23
to be 40.0% 346148352.00
as the recycle 372001428.48
percentage 25853076.48
shall not more than
50.0%.
10.00 This is92759.04 9299.80
because the 60000.23
purity of the 344372216.00
recycle hydrogen 372001428.48
gas is not 27629212.48
that high and might
affect
20.00 92759.04
the reaction 8448.02
in reactor. Hence,60000.23
60.0% of the342566451.72
hydrogen gas372001428.48 29434976.76
is purge out from the
plant.
30.00 92759.04 7596.25 60000.23 340760681.93 372001428.48 31240746.55
From the table 26, the economics potential of the plant increased from
40.00 92759.04 6744.47 60000.23 338954912.14 372001428.48 33046516.34
RM25853076.48/year to RM33046516.34/year when 40.0% of the hydrogen gas
50.00 92759.04 5892.69 60000.23 337149142.36 372001428.48 34852286.12
recycled. The economics potential of the production plant increased when recycle
60.00 92759.04 5040.91 60000.23 335343372.57 372001428.48 36658055.91
stream is introduced.
70.00 92759.04 4189.13 60000.23 333537602.78 372001428.48 38463825.70
88
89
6.5 Separation Operations Used in Production in Production of Propylene Glycol
Table 27 Separation of Operations Used in the Production
Operating Condition
Separation Type of
Code Justification
Unit Phase Temperature Pressure
(K) (bar)
91
7.0 Material and Energy Balance
The following section discusses about the mass balance of the process plant
for the
production of propylene glycol.
states that the mass can neither disappear nor be created. Mass balance
calculation is
used to design chemical reactors or equipment in a plant. The calculation can
later be
used to determine the size of the unit operations of the production
plant.
Input = Output + Accumulation
The mass balance is generally based on the equation above. The mass
that
enter a system as inlet must either leave the system as output or accumulate in
the
Components
system to obey the law of conservation of mass. Molecular Weight (ton/kmol)
For non-reactive process, the
Glycerol (C3H8O3) 0.0921
accumulation
Hydrogen (H2) term is equal to zero. The mass flow0.0020 rate, mole flow rate, mass
fraction
Propylene Glycol (C Conversion
3H8O2) 0.0761 Percentage
and mole fraction for each streams are calculated in Microsoft Excel. The
Ethylene Glycol Conversion
(C2H6O2) of Glycerol 0.0621 0.82
molecular
Methanol (CH OH)
Conversion of Acetol
weight of the components that used in the mass balance
3 0.0320 calculation
0.99 are shown in
Acetol production
(C3H6O2Degradation
) capacity of of Glycerol
propylene glycol is assumed 0.0741
to be 7.10
0.03
Table
Water 29
Table (H 28. Forand
assumption
tonne/hr.
2Conversion reactive
O)Selectivityof
Table
of process
condition
reactions
Propylene
28 that
Molecular
that
takes
Glycol
made takes
place
Weight
for place
in the
the in reactor,
of calculation
Components
plant R-101,
0.0180is shown the
0.92 in calculation
Table 29.92
The
7.2 Stream Table
Table 30 Overall Stream Table for Mass Balance (Stream 1-Stream 19)
Stream No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910 11 12 13 14 15 16 171819
Temperature (deg_C) 30.00 30.00 79.42 200.00 55.66 227.11 200.00 200.00336.00200.00 336.00 336.00 336.00 336.00 259.62 173.49 101.38 101.38 101.38
Pressure (bar) 1.00 1.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.0040.0040.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.001.00
Vapor Fraction 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.001.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.000.000.00
Mole Flow Rate (kmol/hr)
22.060.0022.06
500.18200.07500.18
Glycerol119.22 0.00 119.22 119.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.220.0093.22 22.06 22.06 0.00 0.00 22.06 22.06 0.000.00 0.00
Hydrogen0.00 396.05 0.00 0.00 396.05 596.12 596.12 2.720.002.72 500.18 0.00 500.18 300.11 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.720.002.72 93.22 93.22 0.00 0.00 93.22 93.22 0.030.03 0.01
Ethylene Glycol0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.230.001.23 2.72 2.72 0.00 0.00 2.72 2.72 0.000.00 0.00
Methanol0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.450.0094.45 2.72 2.72 0.00 0.00 2.72 2.72 3.253.25 0.53
Acetol0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.23 1.23 0.00 0.00 1.23 1.23 1.461.46 0.24
Water0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.45 94.45 0.00 0.00 94.45 94.45 112.67 112.67 18.23
Total Mole Flow Rate
(kmol/hr)119.22
Total Mass Flow Rate
(ton/hr)10.98
396.05 119.22 119.22 396.05 596.12 596.12 716.57 200.07 716.57 716.57 216.39 500.18 300.11 216.39 216.39 117.42 117.42 18.99
0.80 10.98 10.98 0.80 1.20 1.20 12.18 0.40 12.18 12.18 11.17 1.01 0.60 11.17 11.17 2.24 2.24 0.36
Table 31 Overall Stream Table for Mass Balance (Stream 20-Stream 41)
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 303132 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
101.38 194.65 194.65 194.65 269.25 285.00 188.35 188.35 188.35 188.35 262.39188.97188.05 188.05 188.05 188.05 197.44 197.44 197.44 285.45 285.45 285.45
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.011.011.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.001.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Mole Flow Rate (kmol/hr)
0.000.000.00
0.000.000.00
0.00 22.06 0.00 22.06 22.06 22.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.1993.19485.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.75 5.69 22.05
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.722.720.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.03 226.44 133.25 93.19 93.19 93.19 104.65 104.65 11.45 93.19 0.000.000.00 485.04 391.86 93.17 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 6.61 3.89 2.72 2.72 2.72 3.05 3.05 0.33 2.72 0.000.000.00 0.85 0.69 0.16 2.92 0.37 2.56 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
94.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
98.42 255.11 137.14 117.97 117.97 117.97 107.70 107.70 11.79 95.91 95.91 95.91 485.89 485.89 392.55 93.34 2.95 0.37 2.58 27.75 5.69 22.05
1.88 19.67 10.38 9.29 9.29 9.29 8.15 8.15 0.89 7.26 7.26 7.26 36.96 36.96 29.86 7.10 0.18 0.02 0.16 2.56 0.52 2.03
93
7.3 Energy Balance Theory
Ideal conditions is assumed for each unit with no shaft work involved. The
enthalpy of each stream is calculated based on specific heat and latent heat of
vaporization when phase change is involved. Theoretically, the specific heat is
affected by pressure. However, in the energy balance calculation, the specific
heat is
assumed to be independent on pressure under ideal
condition.
The specific heat capacity can be calculated using the constants that is
shown
in Appendix F.30. There is only one equipment involve reactive process which is
the
packed bed reactor, R-101. The heat if formation is used to calculate the overall
enthalpy change.
94
7.4Aspen Simulation
7.4.1 Aspen Flow Sheet
95
Table 33 Energy Balance of Overall Stream Balances (Stream 8-Stream 14)
96
7.4.3 Table of comparison between Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN PLUS
Simulation
Table 36 Comparison of total mass flow calculated in Microsoft Excel and in ASPEN
Plus Simulation
97
Overall Heat Duty (MJ/hr)
7.4.3.2 Comparison
P-101 of Heat Duty Microsoft
(MJ/hr) ExcelASPEN Plus
E-101 0.0081.70
Table 37 Comparison
C-101 of heat duty calculated
2.052555.80in Microsoft Excel and in ASPEN Plus
MIXING POINT 0.0010378.76
Simulation
E-102 0.000.05
R-101 -0.11-528.29
E-103 -3198.16-5674.10
Unit Operation Error (%)
E-104 -2940.140.00
V-101 5198.678093.00
100.00
SPLITTING POINT 0.00-13878.50
99.92
D-101 0.000.05
100.00
E-201 0.00-0.40
100.00
V-201 -3003.93-2138.60
99.98
V-202 0.003276.50
43.64
E-202 -4510.80N/A
N/A
E-203 -N/A
35.76
P-301 0.00N/A
100.00
E-301 0.000.00
100.00
V-301 454.3590.70
100.00
E-302 0.00-1.79
40.46
V-302 -3690.32N/A
100.00
E-303 -N/A
P-401 0.00N/A
E-401 0.000.00
V-401 -1957.93-123.34 100.00
E-402 0.00125.60 N/A
Simulation. This
V-402
is due to the different-30.64N/A
boundary selection between manual
1487.42
400.93 calculation
Unitcompare
be
Microsoft
in operation
Excel
with
E-403
V-202,
and
Microsoft
in E-202,
ASPEN Excel
E-203,
PLUS
calculation
simulation.
E-302,
12.55N/A
V-302,
because
E-303,
it does
E-402,
not V-402
present
100.00
and
in E-403
ASPENcannot
PLUS
98
3.4.3.3 Justification between Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus
Table 38 Justification table between Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus Simulation
P-101 1,3 Heat duty The heat duty calculated using Excel and Simulation in ASPEN
are different. The heat duty calculated using ASPEN is 81.7
MJ/hr while using Excel is 0 MJ/hr. The error was 100%. In excel
calculation, the total energy flow differences between inlet
and
outlet is assumed to be the power required for the pump to
operate. No heat duty is generated or released from the
pump.
Therefore, the heat flow will be different compared to Aspen.
E-101, E-102, E- 3,4,7,6,8,10,10, Heat duty The value of total energy flow in heat exchanger does not
11,15,16,17,18,24,25,26, have
103, E-104, E-201, the same value in Excel calculation and ASPEN Plus. This is
27,30,31,32,33,21,22,23, may
E-202, E-301, E-
39,40,41,36,37,38 be due to the different value of specific heat capacity used in
302, E-401, E-402, Excel calculation and ASPEN Plus. Thus, the heat duty of two
different method also will be different.
E-203, E-303, E-403
C-101 2,5 Heat duty The value of heat duty of this unit operation is different in
Excel
D-101 12,15 calculation and ASPEN Simulation because there was a phase
change involve in the simulation while there is no phase
change
V-101 11,12,13 consideration
Temperature The in Excel
temperature calculation.
of flash drum calculated in Excel are different
with the temperature in ASPEN. This is because, Excel
calculation is assumed no temperature difference among the
inlet
and outlet stream.
V-201 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23 Heat duty, The reflux ratio of V-201 calculated in Excel is 0.19 while the
99
reflux ratio value of reflux ratio simulates in ASPEN show minimum value
of
0.29. In Excel, the minimum reflux ratio is calculated using the
Underwood’s method while in ASPEN the DWSTU mode is used
to determine the value of reflux ratio. In addition, by using
Excel,
the calculation is based on the vapor pressure. To calculate
the
vapor pressure, the Antoine constant used might be different
in
ASPEN. Therefore, the value of reflux ratio is different. Due to
the difference in reflux ratio, the mass and energy flow of the
distillation column from Excel calculation and ASPEN
simulation
is deviated. The mass flow of stream 20 in ASPEN simulation is
5.59 ton/hr which is higher than value calculated in Excel
which
is 1.88 ton/hr. The error is about 66.37%. The simulation value
is
higher than the value calculated in excel due to the iteration
loop
caused by internal recycle loop of the distillation column.
Therefore, the unit operation placed after V-201 have different
V-301 25,26,27,28,29,39,40,41 Total mass The
valuevalue of reflux
of mass ratio calculated
flow compared in ASPEN
to value is different
calculated from
in Excel. The
flow, Heat imbalanced
the value calculated
of total mass
usingflow
Microsoft
for thisExcel
equipment
which arewill0.68
be carry
and
duty, reflux 0.12
forwardrespectively.
to the nextInunit
Excel, the minimum
operation refluxthe
throughout ratio is
process
ratio which
calculated
using the Underwood’s
are E-203, P-301, E-301,method
V-301, while
E-302,inV-302,
ASPENE-303,
the DWSTU
P-401, E-
401, V-401,
mode is usedE-402,
to determine
V-402, E-403.
the value of reflux ratio. In
addition,
by using Excel, the calculation is based on the vapor pressure.
To
calculate the vapor pressure, the Antoine constant used might
be
V-401 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38 Total mass The valueinofASPEN.
different reflux ratio calculated
Therefore, in ASPEN
the value is 5.2
of reflux while
ratio is in
flow, Heat Excel is 4.21. In Excel, the minimum reflux ratio is calculated
different.
100
duty, reflux using the Underwood’s method while in ASPEN the DWSTU
ratio mode is used causing inaccurate value of reflux ratio. In
addition,
by using Excel, the calculation is based on the vapor pressure.
To
calculate the vapor pressure, the Antoine constant used might
be
different in ASPEN. Therefore, the value of reflux ratio is
different.
8.0 Utilities
8.1. Utilities Summary
Table 39 Amount of steam required for heating utilities
Heating
Heating Heating Heating
medium
medium inlet medium medium
Unit Code Heating Medium Heat Duty (MJ/hr) outlet
temperature required required
temperature
(K) (ton/hr) (ton/year)
(K)
E-101
Superheated Steam 20.50 523.00 473.00 0.20 1722.88
Heat E-104
Superheated Steam 5203.22 523.00 473.00 51.77 437381.02
Exchanger
E-203
Water 4471.22 523.00 473.00 44.49 375849.83
E-303
Reboiler Water 0.00 323.00 303.00 0.08 656.51
E-403
Water 12.55 323.00 303.00 462.70 3908910.63
101
Table 40 Amount of steam required for cooling utilities
Heat E-201
3006.65 298.00 323.00 1597.70 88686.08 749219983.67
Exchanger
E-401
1957.93 298.00 323.00 1040.42 57752.27 487891159.03
102
8.2 Electricity
Electrical Energy
Unit Code Power Required (kW)
(kWh/year)
0.20 1686.26
P-101
558.07 4714571.71
Pump P-301
548.21 4631247.96
P-401
27.35 231027.64
C-101
854.25 7216694.40
Compressor D-101
Expander
For our proposed propylene glycol plant, there are solid, liquid and
gaseous
waste produced. All these waste requires proper waste treatment in accordance
with
applicable regional and local laws and regulations. This is to ensure the health
and
safety of the public and environment are protected. Improper waste management
treatment will cause pollution to the environment and give adverse health
effects.
Hence, all the waste produced in this plant must be treated and disposed
according to
rules and regulation of Environmental Quality (Sewage and Industrial Effluents)
Regulations 1979.
= 5068.8
Design Basis
Design Parameters
PLATE MECHANICAL
COMPONENT COLUMN
HYDRAULIC DESIGN
DISTRIBUTION SIZING
DESIGN
Tray
Number of Stages Active Area Design Pressure
Spacing
Flooding Design
Reflux Ratio Velocity Hole Area
Temperature
Number of Actual Material of
Stages Net Area Tray Thickness Construction
Column Wall
Downcomer Thickness
Tray Efficiency Hole Diameter
Area Column Head
Location of Feed Column Liquid Flow Design
Stage Diameter Arrangement
Column Column Pressure
Height Drop Insulation
Weeping checking
Downcomer Liquid Stress Analysis
Backup Column Support
Residence Time
Entrainment Nozzle Size
checking
Number of holes
106
Design Method
Fenske-Underwood-Gilliland shortcut method from Seader’s Separation Process
Principles,
Chemical and Biochemical Operations is used for component distribution calculation.
The
column sizing, plate hydraulic design and mechanical design of the distillation column
is
based on Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design.
*Please refer to Appendix for detailed calculation.
Design Criteria
Material of Construction
The material of construction chosen for the distillation is stainless steel type 316.
Stainless
steel was chosen as it can withstand operating temperature and have high mechanical
strength compare to carbon
steel.
107
9.1 Distillation Column, V-201
The basis values of feed used for the calculation are as
below;
Volatility 5.385
Light Key Acetol
Heavy Key Propylene glycol
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
Number of trays: 89Reflux ratio: 0.10
Feed stage from bottom: 67Tray spacing: 0.46 m
Column diameter: 1.4367 mFunctional Height: 42.207 m
Maximum vapour flow rate: 1.8008
Maximum liquid flow rate: 1.0740 kg/s
kg/s
Ratio of column height to diameter : 29.3769Overall tray efficiency (%): 32.86
PLATE HYDRAULIC DESIGN
Active area: 1.2321 m2Liquid flow arrangement : Cross
108
flow single pass
Type of tray: Sieve trayTray thickness: 5 mm
Hole diameter: 0.005mWeir length: 1.0919 m
Active holes: 6275Weir height: 0.05 m
Total plate pressure drop: 74.4275
Flow rate turndown: 70%
mm liquid per tray
Percentage flooding: 80%Entrainment: 0.085
Unperforated strip round plate edge:
Calming zone width: 50 mm
50 mm
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Design pressure: 1.1 barDesign temperature: 204 o C
Material of construction: Stainless steel Type
Column wall thickness: 5 mm
316L
Type of head: TorisphericalHead thickness: 0.54 mm
Insulation: Rock woolInsulation thickness: 75 mm
Vessel support: Conical skirtSkirt thickness: 13 mm
Feed inlet nozzle size: 2 inCorrosion allowance: 2 mm
Reflux inlet nozzle size: 0.3 inTop outlet nozzle size: 0.8 in
Boil up inlet nozzle size: 2 inBottom outlet nozzle size: 1.9 in
Welding joint factor : 0.85
Aspen Comparison
The following parameters were compared with the calculation based on Aspen and
Excel.
For the Aspen simulation, the simulation was done based on DSTWU distillation
model.
From the Aspen simulation, it can be concluded that both excel and Aspen calculation
are
nearly the same with minimal deviation except for the minimum number of stages. This
is
109
because the no of stages are dependent on the relative volatility which is calculated
manually
in Excel meanwhile the minimum number of stages are calculated by using a short-cut
method in Aspen Plus (DSTWU).
0.022
1.4367
0.00765
42.2070
0.05042
1.4367
0.05085
3.2
1.6
Distillation Column
Date 11/12/2018
110
9.2 Distillation Column, V-301
Design Basis
Volatility 20.408
Light Key Ethylene Glycol
Heavy Key Glycerol
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
Number of trays: 66Reflux ratio: 0.07
Feed stage from bottom: 45Tray spacing: 0.3 m
Column diameter: 1.5169 mFunctional Height: 20.998 m
Maximum vapour flow rate: 1.6574
Maximum liquid flow rate: 2.7235 kg/s
kg/s
Ratio of column height to diameter : 13.8424Overall tray efficiency (%): 29.64
PLATE HYDRAULIC DESIGN
Liquid flow arrangement : Cross
2
Active area: 1.3735 m
flow single pass
Type of tray: Sieve trayTray thickness: 5 mm
Hole diameter: 0.005mWeir length: 1.1529 m
Active holes: 6995Weir height: 0.05 m
Total plate pressure drop: 79.5354
Flow rate turndown: 70%
mm liquid per tray
Percentage flooding: 80%Entrainment: 0.075
111
Unperforated strip round plate edge:
Calming zone width: 50 mm
50 mm
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Design pressure: 1.1 barDesign temperature: 296 o C
Material of construction: Stainless steel Type
Column wall thickness: 5 mm
316L
Type of head: TorisphericalHead thickness: 0.61 mm
Insulation: Rock woolInsulation thickness: 75 mm
Vessel support: Conical skirtSkirt thickness: 13 mm
Feed inlet nozzle size: 2.3 inCorrosion allowance: 2 mm
Reflux inlet nozzle size: 0.7 inTop outlet nozzle size: 2.2 in
Boil up inlet nozzle size: 0.6 inBottom outlet nozzle size: 1.2 in
Welding joint factor : 0.85
Aspen Comparison
The following parameters were compared with the calculation based on Aspen and
Excel.
For the Aspen simulation, the simulation was done based on DSTWU distillation
model.
Variables Excel Aspen
Minimum reflux ratio 0.05 0.22
Actual reflux ratio 0.07 0.23
Minimum number of 6.0087=6 stages 7.299=7stages
stages
Number of actual stages
Feed stage 66.89= 67stages 66 stages
Number of actual stages 44.85= 45stages 31.1994 = 31 stages
above feed 44 stages 30.1994 = 30 stages
Reboiler heating
required 1.83E+06 kJ/hr 8.02 E+06 kJ/hr
Condenser cooling
required
Distillate temperature 1.58E+06 kJ/hr 7.16 E+06 kJ/hr
Bottom temperature
188.35 oC 214.293 oC
285.45 oC 276.948 oC
From the Aspen simulation, it can be concluded that both excel and Aspen calculation
are
nearly the same with minimal deviation except for the minimum reflux ratio and actual
reflux ratio. This is because the reflux ratio are calculated manually in excel by using
Underwood method meanwhile the reflux ratio are calculated by using a short-cut
method in
Aspen Plus (DSTWU).
112
0.05563
1.5169
0.01669
20.998
0.05784
1.5169
0.014
3.2
1.7
Distillation Column
Date 12/12/2018
Volatility 22.991
Light Key Propylene Glycol
113
Heavy Key Ethylene Glycol
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
Number of trays: 119Reflux ratio: 4.22
Feed stage from bottom: 43Tray spacing: 0.46 m
Column diameter: 2.44 mFunctional Height: 56.097 m
Maximum vapour flow rate: 6.5413
Maximum liquid flow rate: 10.3437 kg/s
kg/s
Ratio of column height to diameter : 22.9494Overall tray efficiency (%): 53.165
PLATE HYDRAULIC DESIGN
Liquid flow arrangement : Cross
2
Active area: 3.5665 m
flow single pass
Type of tray: Sieve trayTray thickness: 5 mm
Hole diameter: 0.005mWeir length: 1.8577 m
Active holes: 18162Weir height: 0.05 m
Total plate pressure drop: 105.6261
Flow rate turndown: 70%
mm liquid per tray
Percentage flooding: 80%Entrainment: 0.065
Unperforated strip round plate edge:
Calming zone width: 50 mm
50 mm
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Design pressure: 1.1 barDesign temperature: 208 o C
Material of construction: Stainless steel Type
Column wall thickness: 5 mm
316L
Type of head: TorisphericalHead thickness: 0.92 mm
Insulation: Rock woolInsulation thickness: 75 mm
Vessel support: Conical skirtSkirt thickness: 13 mm
Feed inlet nozzle size: 2.2 inCorrosion allowance: 2 mm
Reflux inlet nozzle size: 0.2 inTop outlet nozzle size: 2.2 in
114
Boil up inlet nozzle size: 0.2 in Bottom outlet nozzle size: 0.4 in
Welding joint factor : 0.85
Aspen Comparison
The following parameters were compared with the calculation based on Aspen and
Excel.
For the Aspen simulation, the simulation was done based on DSTWU distillation
model.
From the Aspen simulation, it can be concluded that both excel and Aspen calculation
are
nearly the same with minimal deviation except for the minimum and actual number of
stages. This is because the no of stages are dependent on the relative volatility which
is
calculated manually in Excel meanwhile the minimum and actual number of stages are
calculated by using a short-cut method in Aspen Plus (DSTWU).
115
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
0.0555
2.44
0.0042
2
56.097
0.05607
2.44
0.00423
3.2
2.5
Distillation Column
Date 14/12/2018
116
10.0 Heat Transfer Equipment Design
Heat Exchanger
Design basis
When designing heat exchanger, the properties such as density, specific heat, viscosity
and
thermal conductivity of component and utility involved are determined at different
temperature and pressure. These properties are obtained using ASPEN
Plus.
Design method and assumption
The step and guidelines in designing heat exchanger are based on the steps provided in
Coulson Richardson’s Chemical Engineering. Vol 6 Chemical Engineering Design 4th Ed.
117
The calculation is shown in Appendix X. The assumption of all heat exchanger also is
provided in the same appendix.
Design Criteria
E-101 Before entering reactor, R-101 which operate at 473K, the glycerol
needs to be heat up from 352.42K to
473K.
E-102 The hydrogen from stream 3 also need to heat up from 352.42K to
473K before entering R-101.
E-104 E-401 will cooled down propylene glycol which is the main product
from 535.39K to 461.27K.
E-402 To condense the outlet distillate from V-401 contain the main
product
which is propylene glycol
118
Material of construction
The material of construction used for all heat exchanger in this plant is Stainless Steel
316.
For condenser and reboiler, Stainless Steel 304 is chosen. Kettle type reboiler is chosen
because boiling takes place on tubes immersed in a pool of liquid and there is no need
of
liquid circulation through the
exchanger.
10.1 Heat Exchanger, E-101
Table 46 Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger E-101
No of unit: 1
General
Function: Before entering reactor, R-101 which operate at 473K, the glycerol needs
to be
heat up from 352.42K to 473K.
Operation: Continuous
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
Pressure (bar) 40 40 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
119
Thickness (m) 0.002 Number of shells 1
Number of passes 1
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 508.0
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
120
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Comparison table between ASPEN Plus Simulation and Microsoft Excel Calculation
Justification for differences in Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus Simulation
121
There is some difference of heat duty value in ASPEN Plus Simulation and Microsoft
Excel
Simulation. This is due to different calculation of specific enthalpy in both methods. In
Excel
calculation, we use constant to calculate the heat duty. The linearity of the value also
might
be different. The number of tubes present in E-101 also different when using simulation.
This
might be because of different surface area of tube causing different number of tubes
obtained.
The shell inside diameter are different but the difference is not too much. Since the heat
duty
obtained are different which is higher than in excel, the mass flow rate in shell side are
also
high. This cause the shell inside diameter to be slightly
different.
No of unit: 1
General
Function: The hydrogen from stream 3 also need to heat up from 352.42K to 473K
before
entering R-101.
Operation:
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
Pressure (bar) 40 40 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
122
Tube Shell
Number of passes 2
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 320.5
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
123
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Comparison table between ASPEN Plus Simulation and Microsoft Excel Calculation
124
Justification for differences in Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus Simulation
The number of tubes is not much different in for both methods. The difference may be
due to
small difference of surface area of tube. However, the heat duty shows large difference.
This
is because, the calculation of specific enthalpy in ASPEN are different compared in
Excel
10.3 Heat Exchanger, E-104
calculation. The constant used also caused the value to be different.
No of unit: 1
General
Function: E-104 will heat up glycerol, hydrogen, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol,
methanol, acetol and water from 473K to 609K before entering flash drum that
operates at
609K.
Operation: Continuous
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
Pressure (bar) 40 40 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
Tube Shell
125
Length (m) 7.32 Shell clearance diameter 94
(mm)
Number of passes 8
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 781.0
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
126
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Comparison table between ASPEN Plus Simulation and Microsoft Excel Calculation
Justification for differences in Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus Simulation
The difference of enthalpy data in ASPEN and Excel contribute to the difference heat
duty
for both methods. There are also slightly different in the number of tube when we do
127
simulation in ASPEN. The difference in the number of tubes cause the shell inside
dimeter to
be different.
No of unit: 1
General
Function: E-201 is used to cooled down component that exits from bottom part of flash
drum
which are glycerol, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, methanol, acetol and water from
532.622K to 394K.
Operation: Continuous
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
128
Arrangement Triangular Baffle cut (%) 25
Number of passes 2
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 320.5
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
129
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Comparison table between ASPEN Plus Simulation and Microsoft Excel Calculation
Justification for differences in Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus Simulation
Heat duty calculated in E-201 is also different in both different method of calculation.
This
may be due to different specific enthalpy values as the constant used is different.
However,
130
the difference in the number of tubes are small and brings no effect to the inside
diameter of
shell. The differences in the number of tubes is due to different surface are calculated
in
ASPEN and Excel.
10.5 Heat Exchanger, E-301
No of unit: 1
General
Function: E-301 cooled down glycerol, propylene glycol and ethylene glycol from
reboiler
E-203 from 542.245K to 467K.
Operation:
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
131
Arrangement Triangular Baffle cut (%) 25
Number of passes 8
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 340.5
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
132
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Comparison table between ASPEN Plus Simulation and Microsoft Excel Calculation
Justification for differences in Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus Simulation
As usual, the heat duty of E-301 also different in both methods. The heat duty
calculated in
Microsoft Excel calculation is high compared to in ASPEN Plus. This difference is due to
133
different constant used to calculate the specific enthalpy. There is also huge different in
the
number of tubes. This may be due to different value of heat transfer area for this heat
exchanger. The smaller the number of tubes, the smaller the bundle diameter. Thus,
shell
inside diameter is smaller
No of unit: 1
General
Function: E-401 will cooled down propylene glycol which is the main product from
535.39K
to 461.27K.
Operation: Continuous
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
134
Length (m) 1.83 Shell clearance diameter 52
(mm)
Number of passes 6
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 320.50
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
135
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Comparison table between ASPEN Plus Simulation and Microsoft Excel Calculation
136
Justification for differences in Microsoft Excel Calculation and ASPEN Plus Simulation
The value of heat duty in Excel calculation is different compared to in ASPEN Plus. This
is
because, the value of specific enthalpy is different. However, the number of tubes is not
much
different cause the shell inside diameter to slightly
affected.
10.7 Condenser, E-103
Table 52 Specification Sheet of Condenser E-103
CONDENSER, E-103
No of unit: 1
General
Function: To condense the vapor phase to liquid phase of the top product of distillation
column for reflux purpose and to cool down the components from distillation column.
Operation: Continuous
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
Pressure (bar) 1 1 40 40
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
137
(mm)
Number of passes 8
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 483.00
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
138
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Based on the comparison table above, it shown that there is major differences of heat
duty
between Aspen calculation and manual calculation. We calculated the value of heat duty
by
using the differences of enthalpy inlet and enthalpy outlet of the condenser which
resulted
heat duty for manual calculation is 290.136 W which is lower than the Aspen calculation.
Hence, the flow rate of shell is low. Besides, the number of tube for manual calculation
is 240
tubes while for Aspen calculation is 357 tubes. This is because heat duty value affected
the
number of tube needed to do the work and it also cause the difference of shell inside
diameter
between Aspen calculation and manual calculation. Aspen calculation have higher shell
139
inside diameter compared to manual calculation. In conclusion, heat duty affected the
number
of tube and shell inside diameter of the
condenser.
10.8 Condenser, E-202
Table 53 Specification Sheet for Condenser E-202
CONDENSER, E-202
No of unit: 1
General
Function: To condense the vapor phase to liquid phase of the top product of distillation
column for reflux purpose and to cool down the components from distillation column.
Operation: Continuous
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
140
Pitch 0.031 Baffle spacing (m) 0.144
Number of passes 8
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 384.38
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
141
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
There is major differences in heat duty between Aspen calculation and manual
calculation
which affected the number of tube, shell inside diameter and length of the condenser.
The
manual calculation of heat duty of condenser is calculated by using the differences of
enthalpy inlet and enthalpy outlet of the condenser which resulted heat duty for manual
calculation is 541.857 W which is higher than the Aspen calculation. This cause the
number
of tube to do work for manual calculation is 120 tubes while for Aspen calculation is 212
tubes. Based on number of tubes for both calculation, it affect the length of condenser
and
shell inside diameter which resulted lebgth of condenser for Aspen calculation is lower
than
142
the manual calculation. Thus, higher heat duty cause the number of tube, length of
condenser
and shell inside diameter
affected.
10.9 Condenser, E-302
Table 54 Specification Sheet of Condenser E-302
CONDENSER, E-302
No of unit: 1
General
Function: To condense the vapor phase to liquid phase of the top product of distillation
column for reflux purpose and to cool down the components from distillation column.
Operation: Continuous
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
143
Pitch 0.025 Baffle spacing (m) 0.141
Number of passes 8
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 471.35
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
144
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Based on the comparison table above, it shown that there is major differences of heat
duty
between Aspen calculation and manual calculation. The value of heat duty is calculated
by
using the differences of enthalpy inlet and enthalpy outlet of the condenser which
resulted
heat duty for manual calculation is higher than the Aspen calculation. Heat duty for
manual
calculation is 541.857 W while Aspen calculation is 445.765 W. The heat duty of manual
calculation is higher due to mass flow rate in the shell. Moreover, value of heat duty
affected
the number of tubes needed to do work and cause difference shell inside diameter. The
number of tubes and shell inside diameter for Aspen calculation is higher than manual
145
calculation due to lower heat duty value. In conclusion, the higher heat duty gives low
value
of the number of tube and shell inside diameter of the
condenser.
10.10 Condenser, E-402
Table 55 Specification Sheet of Condenser E-402
CONDENSER, E-402
No of unit: 1
General
Function: To condense the vapor phase to liquid phase of the top product of distillation
column for reflux purpose and to cool down the components from distillation column.
Operation: Continuous
Orientation: Horizontal
OPERATING DATA
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1 1
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
146
Pitch 0.063 Baffle spacing (m) 0.244
Number of passes 4
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell: 471.35
Nozzle size
Tube Shell
147
AutoCAD Drawing of Designed Operation Unit
Based on the comparison table above, major differences of heat duty between Aspen
calculation and manual calculation is shown. The heat duty value of Aspen calculation is
7034.594 W which is more higher compared to manual calculation. The value of heat
duty
for manual calculation is lower because it is calculated manually by using the
differences of
enthalpy inlet and enthalpy outlet of the condenser which resulted heat duty for manual
calculation is 704.77 W which is lower than the Aspen calculation. This cause lower flow
rate flow in the shell. Hence, it gives lower number of tubes needed to work. Number of
tubes
for manual calculation is 132 tubes which is lower compared to Aspen calculation. This
is
148
because heat duty of manual calculation is lower which resulted lower number of tube
needed
to do work. Besides, the value of shell inside diameter between Aspen calculation and
manual
calculation only have small differences 0f 0.1 m. In conclusion, the higher the heat duty,
the
higher the mass flow rate in the shell and the higher the number of tubes needed to
do work.
10.11 Reboiler, E-203
REBOILER (E-203)
Date: 14/12/2018
Identification: E-203
By: Joan Mary
Item: Reboiler
No. of unit: 1
Function: To heat up and vaporize the liquid residue in the bottom stream of
distillation
column and recycled the vapor back to the distillation column to improve
the
efficiency of distillation separation.
Operation: Continuous
OPERATING DATA
Materials handled: Tube Inlet Tube Outlet Shell Shell Shell Liquid
Inlet Vapor Outlet
Outlet
Mass flow rate
(kmol/hr) 2396.99 2396.99 279.35 161.39 117.97
Temperature (K) 523.00 473.00 465.65 467.65 467.65
Pressure (bar) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
Type: Kettle reboiler
Heat duty per unit: 2420042 W
Total heat transfer area: 145.4168717 m2
Overall heat transfer coefficient: 700 W/m2. K
Tubes:Shell:
Inside diameter (m):0.049996Inside diameter (mm):
Outside diameter (m):0.05Wall thickness (mm): 1.8674
Wall thickness (m):0.002Number of baffles: 1.0754
Length (m):6.1Equivalent diameter (m): 4
Pitch (mm):0.0625Baffle cut (%): 0.0494
Number of tubes needed:152Baffle spacing (m): 25
Number of tube passes:8Pressure drop (bar): 0.4668
Pressure drop (bar):178.5899 0.0098
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Design pressure (bar):Design temperature (K):
Tube1.10Tube
Shell1.10Shell
Materials of constructionStainless steel Corrosion allowance (mm): 508
304 476.65
2
149
Type of head: Torispherical Head thickness (mm): 1904.808033
head
Insulation: Mineral wool Insulation thickness (mm): 75
Vessel support: Saddle Shell inlet nozzle size (in): 4.00
Tube inlet nozzle size (in): 12.00 Shell vapor outlet nozzle size 6.00
(in):
Shell liquid outlet nozzle size
Tube outlet nozzle size (in): 12.00 (in): 3.00
* Aspen is not applicable to this equipment because kettle reboiler is used. Aspen
generates
result in vapour phase but our plant produces product in liquid phase.
10.12 Reboiler, E-303
Table 57 Specification Sheet of Reboiler E-203
REBOILER (E-303)
Date: 14/12/2018
Identification: E-303
By: Joan Mary
Item: Reboiler
No. of unit: 1
Function: To heat up and vaporize the liquid residue in the bottom stream of
distillation
column and recycled the vapor back to the distillation column to improve
the
efficiency of distillation separation.
Operation: Continuous
OPERATING DATA
Materials handled: Tube Inlet Tube OutletShell Shell Shell Liquid
Inlet Vapor Outlet
Outlet
Mass flow rate
(kmol/hr) 1217.98 1217.98 27.48 5.43 22.05
Temperature (K) 323.00 303.00 556.45 558.65 558.65
Pressure (bar) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
Type: Kettle reboiler
Heat duty per unit: -518022 W
2
Total heat transfer area: 3.027431286 m
2
Overall heat transfer coefficient: 700 W/m . K
Tubes:Shell: 0.3913
Inside diameter (m):0.0299968Inside diameter (m): 0.2432
Outside diameter (m):0.03Wall thickness (mm): 4
Wall thickness (m):0.0016Number of baffles: 0.0296
Length (m):1.83Equivalent diameter (m): 25
Pitch:0.0375Baffle cut (%): 0.0978
Number of tubes needed:24Baffle spacing (m): 0.0045
Number of tube passes:8Pressure drop (bar):
Pressure drop (bar):656.9685
MECHANICAL DESIGN
150
Design pressure (bar): Design temperature (K):
Tube 1.10 Tube 323.00
Shell 1.10 Shell 567.55
Materials of construction Stainless steel Corrosion allowance (mm): 2
304
Torispherical
Type of head: head Head thickness (mm): 430.7556043
Mineral wool
Insulation: Saddle Insulation thickness (mm): 75
Vessel support: 16.00 Shell inlet nozzle size (in): 2.00
Tube inlet nozzle size (in): Shell vapor outlet nozzle size 2.00
(in):
Shell liquid outlet nozzle size
Tube outlet nozzle size (in): 15.00 (in): 2.00
* Aspen is not applicable to this equipment because kettle reboiler is used. Aspen
generates
result in vapour phase but our plant produces product in liquid phase.
10.13 Reboiler, E-403
REBOILER (E-403)
Date: 14/12/2018
Identification: E-403
By: Joan Mary
Item: Reboiler
No. of unit: 1
Function: To heat up and vaporize the liquid residue in the bottom stream of
distillation
column and recycled the vapor back to the distillation column to improve
the
efficiency of distillation separation.
Operation: Continuous
OPERATING DATA
Materials handled: Tube Inlet Tube Outlet Shell Shell Shell Liquid
Inlet Vapor Outlet
Outlet
Mass flow rate
(kmol/hr) 97.43 97.43 487.41 394.07 93.34
Temperature (K) 323.00 303.00 468.44 470.44 470.44
Pressure (bar) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
Type: Kettle reboiler
Heat duty per unit: -407333 W
Total heat transfer area: 3.72377615 m2
Overall heat transfer coefficient: 700 W/m2. K
Tubes:
Inside diameter (m):0.0299968 Shell:
Outside diameter (m):0.03 Inside diameter (m): 0.3580
Wall thickness (m):0.0016 Wall thickness (mm): 0.2077
Length (m):1.83 Number of baffles: 4
Equivalent diameter (m): 0.0296
151
Pitch: 0.0375Baffle cut (%): 25
Number of tubes needed: 24Baffle spacing (m): 0.0894
Number of tube passes: 6Pressure drop (bar): 0.000040
Pressure drop (bar): 2.9174
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Design temperature (K):
Design pressure (bar): 1.10Tube
Tube 1.10Shell 323.00
Shell Stainless steel Corrosion allowance (mm): 479.44
Materials of construction 304 2
Torispherical Head thickness (mm):
head
Type of head: 430.7556043
Mineral wool Insulation thickness (mm):
SaddleShell inlet nozzle size (in):
Insulation: 5.00Shell vapor outlet nozzle size 75
Vessel support: (in): 0.50
Tube inlet nozzle size (in): 5.00Shell liquid outlet nozzle size 0.30
(in):
Tube outlet nozzle size (in): 0.40
* Aspen is not applicable to this equipment because kettle reboiler is used. Aspen
generates
result in vapour phase but our plant produces product in liquid phase.
11.0 Reactor Design
bubble-flow reactor with co-current gas-liquid upflow through the packed bed is
used
as the design of the reactor as the upflow operation gives higher conversions
than the [1]
downflow operation under the same reaction . The co-current gas-liquid
condition
upflow operation provides complete catalyst wetting and fasten the transport of
the
reactants to the catalyst that packed in the [1]. The chemical reaction occurred in
bed
152
the reactor is the 2-step mechanism reactions, hydrogenolysis of glycerol to
propylene
glycol.
Design Parameters
The design parameters for the reactor are Inner diameter, mass of catalyst, pressure
drop,
reactor size, design temperature and pressure, material of construction, reactor wall
thickness, jacket thickness and nozzle
size.
Design method
POLYMATH is used to calculate the size of the reactor and the pressure drop due to the
complication caused by the 2-step mechanisms of the hydrogenolysis of glycerol to
propylene glycol. The reaction kinetics that applied in the calculation is referred to
study
done by Zhou et al. [2]. The design of the reactor is based on Coulson and Richardson’s
Chemical Engineering Design for mechanical design and the cooling jacket design is
based
on the J. P. Holman’s Heat transfer.
Material of construction
After the calculation of mechanical stresses of the reactor, the material of construction
is
chosen to be stainless steel type 316 as it withstand the stresses at the shell, head,
support
and openings. Besides, stainless steel type 316 has good corrosion-resistance and
heat-
resistance which is suitable to be used as the material of construction as the reactor
consist
high temperature water which possessed high corrosion
property.
153
COMPONENTS INLET (kg/hr) OUTLET (kg/hr)
Glycerol 10979.72 2031.25
Hydrogen 1201.65 1008.26
Propylene Glycol 0 7093.40
Ethylene Glycol 0 168.87
Methanol 0 87.18
Acetol 0 90.95
Water 0 1701.47
GENERAL DESIGN DATA
Stainless steel type 316
3.15 m
1.38 m
Material of Construction: 1.45 m
Functional height: 2.90 m3
Diameter (internal): 0.18 bar
Diameter (external): 0.45
Reactor volume: Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 [ratio =
Pressure drop: 1:1:0.5]
Void fraction: 0.00034m
1050 kg/m3
1675 kg
Catalyst: Support grid
Catalyst diameter: UTILITY DESIGN
Catalyst density: 3218.97 MJ/hr
Mass of catalyst: 2.52 m
Catalyst support: 5.5 cm
Cooling water
30.89 ton/hr
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Cooling duty: 44 bar
Cooling jacket length: 210 C
Jacket thickness: Hemispherical head
Cooling medium: Conical skirt
Mass flow rate: 33 mm
22 mm
33 mm
Design Pressure:
Design Temperature:
Type of head:
Type of support:
Vessel wall thickness:
Head thickness:
Skirt thickness:
Glycerol inlet nozzle
size:
Hydrogen inlet nozzle
size: 2.5 in
Product outlet nozzle
size: 1.0 in
Cooling water inlet
nozzle size: 10.0 in
Cooling water outlet
nozzle size: 4.0 in
4.0 in
154
ASPEN Simulation
Cooling duty: 1100.14 MJ/hr
The cooling duty that obtained from ASPEN simulation is 1100.14 MJ/hr which is lower
than the cooling duty that obtained from manual energy balance calculation. The
cooling
duty that obtained from the manual energy balance calculation is 3218.97 MJ/hr. The
difference of the cooling duty obtained from ASPEN simulation and manual energy
balance
calculation is due to the heat capacity constants that being used in both methods are
different. The manual energy balance calculation is based on the heat capacity
constants that
obtained from Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook (Sixth Edition). The calculation
method
AutoCADofDrawing
the ASPEN simulation
of Designed is “NRTL”.
Operation Unit
155
12.0 Auxiliary Equipment Design
Auxiliary equipment play important role in a production plant. The auxiliary
equipment design provides the idea of how big the size of the equipment and
how
much power the equipment required in order for it to
operate.
12.1 Pump
Pump is used to transfer the raw material from its storage tank to a heat exchange
before
feeding into another unit operation. The power required for the pump to operate is
calculated.
Design Parameters
The design parameters for the pump are pipe diameter, total pump head, Net Pump
Suction
Head (NPSH), pump efficiency and power required.
Design method
The pump power design is based on the Bernoulli’s
Equation.
Pump, P-101
Item: Pump Date: 5 December 2018
Item No: P-101
Identification:
By: LOW YING KAI
No. Required: 1
Function: Used to pump fluid.
Operation: Continuous
Type: Centrifugal Pump
FLOW STREAM CONDITION
INLET (kg/hr)OUTLET (kg/hr)
COMPONENTS 10979.7210979.72
Glycerol 00
Hydrogen 00
Propylene Glycol 00
Ethylene Glycol 00
Methanol 00
Acetol 00
Water GENERAL DESIGN DATA
1 bar
40 bar
Inlet Pressure:
Outlet Pressure:
156
Pipe diameter: 2.5 inch
Total Pump Head:319.94 m
NPSHA: 4.11 m
Pump Efficiency: 65%
Power required: 14.73 kW
Motor Power: 20 bhp
ASPEN Simulation
Pump Efficiency:40%
Power required:23.48 kW
* The detailed design calculation steps are shown in
Appendix.
The power required for the pump is 14.73kW when manually calculated while the power
required is 23.48kW using ASPEN simulation. The different in amount of power required
is
due to the pump efficiency that being used in manual calculation and ASPEN simulation
is
different.
Pump, P-301
Date: 5 December
Item: Pump 2018
Identification: Item No: P-301
No. Required: 1
By: LOW YING KAI
Used to pump fluid.
Function: Continuous
Operation: Centrifugal Pump
Type: FLOW STREAM CONDITION
INLET (kg/hr)
2031.25
COMPONENTS 0 OUTLET (kg/hr)
Glycerol 7091.27 2031.25
Hydrogen 168.87 0
Propylene Glycol 0 7091.27
Ethylene Glycol 0 168.87
Methanol 0 0
Acetol GENERAL DESIGN DATA 0
Water 1 bar 0
1.01 bar
2.5 inch
2.35 m
3.75 m
Inlet Pressure:
Outlet Pressure:
Pipe diameter:
Total Pump Head:
NPSHA:
157
Pump Efficiency: 60%
Power required: 0.09 kW
Motor Power: 1 bhp
ASPEN Simulation
Pump Efficiency:43%
Power required:0.0067 kW
* The detailed design calculation steps are shown in
Appendix.
The power required for the pump is 0.09kW when manually calculated while the power
required is 0.0067kW using ASPEN simulation. The different in amount of power required
is
due to the pump efficiency that being used in manual calculation and ASPEN simulation
is
different.
Pump, P-401
Date: 5 December
Identification: Item: Pump 2018
Item No: P-401
No. Required: 1
By: LOW YING KAI
Used to pump fluid.
Function: Continuous
Operation: Centrifugal Pump
Type: FLOW STREAM CONDITION
INLET (kg/hr)
0
COMPONENTS 0 OUTLET (kg/hr)
Glycerol 7091.27 0
Hydrogen 168.83 0
Propylene Glycol 0 7091.27
Ethylene Glycol 0 168.83
Methanol 0 0
Acetol GENERAL DESIGN DATA 0
Water 1 bar 0
1.01 bar
2.5 inch
1.93 m
4.17 m
Inlet Pressure: 60%
Outlet Pressure: 0.06 kW
Pipe diameter:
Total Pump Head:
NPSHA:
Pump Efficiency:
Power required:
158
Motor Power: 1 bhp
ASPEN Simulation
Pump Efficiency:40%
Power required:0.0060 kW
* The detailed design calculation steps are shown in
Appendix.
The power required for the pump is 0.06kW when manually calculated while the power
required is 0.0060kW using ASPEN simulation. The different in amount of power required
is
due to the pump efficiency that being used in manual calculation and ASPEN simulation
is
different.
12.2 Compressor
Design Parameters
The design parameters for the compressor are compression ratio, number of
compression
stages, polytropic efficiency, motor efficiency and power
required.
Design method
The compressor design is based on Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design.
Table 63 Specification Sheet of Compressor C-101
Compressor, C-101
Item: CompressorDate: 6 December 2018
Item No: C-101
Identification:
No. Required: 3By: LOW YING KAI
Used to compress hydrogen gas.
Function: Continuous
Operation: Centrifugal compressor
Type: FLOW STREAM CONDITION
INLET (kg/hr)OUTLET (kg/hr)
00
COMPONENTS 798.35798.35
Glycerol 00
Hydrogen 00
Propylene Glycol 00
Ethylene Glycol 00
Methanol
Acetol
159
Water 0 0
GENERAL DESIGN DATA
1 bar
Inlet Pressure:
40 bar
Outlet Pressure:
2 stages
Number of stages:
72%
Polytropic efficiency:
97%
Compressor efficiency:
11489.47 kW
Power required:
ASPEN Simulation
0.72
3165.96 kW
Polytropic efficiency:
Power required:
The power required for the compressor is 11489.47 kW when manually calculated while
the
power required is 3165.96 kW using ASPEN simulation. The different in amount of power
required is due to the calculation model type that used in ASPEN is not multistage
compressor.
Design Parameters
The following design parameters were considered : Vessel Size, Inlet and Outlet Nozzle,
Vessel wall thickness, Vessel support, The flash drum V-101 is used to separate the
hydrogen
from the product mixture before entering the distillation
column.
Inlet Outlet (Top) Outlet (Bottom)
Molar Flowrate 716.57 500.18 216.39
(kmol/hr)
Mass Flowrate 12.18 1.01 11.17
(ton/hr)
Design Criteria
Vessel Mechanical
Velocity of Liquid Droplets Design Pressure
Vessel Diameter Design Temperature
Cross sectional Area of vessel Material of construction
160
Height of vapor section Vessel Thickness
Height of liquid section Vessel Head Design
Total height Vessel Support
Nozzle size
Composition (ton/hr)
Glycerol 2.03125 0.00 2.03
Hydrogen 1.00826 1.01 0.00
Propylene glycol 7.09340 0.00 7.09
Ethylene glycol 0.16887 0.00 0.17
Methanol
0.08718 0.00 0.09
Acetol
0.09095 0.00 0.09
Water
1.70147 0.00 1.70
12.18138 1.01 11.17
Total
Design Data
Dimension type Cylinder Hold up time (min) 5
Internal diameter (m) 0.70 Liquid depth (m) 3.20
Outer diameter (m) 0.71 Demister pad area (m2) 0.39
Total height (m) 4.65 Demister pad thickness (mm) 100
Mechanical Design Data
12.4 Expander
161
The design parameters for the compressor are expansion ratio, number of expansion
stages,
polytropic efficiency, motor efficiency and power
generated.
Design method
Expander, D-101
Date: 6 December
Identification: Item: Expander 2018
Item No: D-101
No. Required: 1By: LOW YING KAI
Used to expand product mixture.
Function: Continuous
Operation: Turbine
Type: FLOW STREAM CONDITION
INLET (kg/hr)OUTLET (kg/hr)
2031.252031.25
COMPONENTS 00
Glycerol 7093.47093.4
Hydrogen 168.87168.87
Propylene Glycol 87.1887.18
Ethylene Glycol 90.9590.95
Methanol 1701.471701.47
Acetol GENERAL DESIGN DATA
Water 40 bar
1 bar
2 stages
61%
90%
Inlet Pressure: 22.61 kW
Outlet Pressure:
Number of stages:
Polytropic efficiency:
Expander efficiency:
Power required:
162
12.5 Reflux Drum
Design Basis
Reflux drum is used to distribute the outlet of the condenser between the reflux
and the
distillate as a liquid product.
Design Parameters
Volumetric Flow Rate, Q ;Volume of Reflux Drum, V; Diameter of Reflux Drum, D; Length
of Reflux Drum
Design Criteria
Pressure (bar) & Temperature (K)
Design Method
The reflux drum calculation is based on Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design. (*Please refer to Appendix for detailed calculation.)
Assumption
The assumption made is that the inlet is single phase, liquid after flowing through the
total
condenser.
Material of Construction
The material of construction chosen for the drum is Stainless Steel 316 as it has
high
resistance to corrosive chemicals considering that V-202 contains methanol which is
highly
corrosive.
Density(kg/m3) 948.319
Hold Up Time (min) 10
163
No.of unit : 1
GENERAL
Function : Distribution point for reflux and distillate for Distillation Column, V-201
Operation : ContinuousOrientation : Horizontal
Material of Construction : Stainless Steel 316
OPERATING DATA
Mass Flow Rate
Temperature (K)374.37631562.24
(ton/hr)
Pressure (bar)1
Volumetric Flow Rate (m 3/hr) 2.367172628
Density (kg/m3)948.319
OPERATIONAL DESIGN
Volume of Drum (m3)0.789Diameter of Drum (m)0.694
Length of Drum (m)2.083Hold Up Time (min)10
Density(kg/m3) 948.319
Hold Up Time (min) 10
164
12.5.3
13.0 Reflux Drum, V-402
References
1. National Centre for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound
Database
‘Propylene
Mass Flow Rate (ton/hr) 36.96
Glycol’,2018 ; Retrieved from:
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/1030
Density(kg/m3) 948.319
2. International Programme on Up
Hold Chemical Safety, “Propylene Glycol", 2018; Retrieved
Time (min) 10
from:
http://www.inchem.org/documents/pims/chemical/pim443.ht
m
3. The European Chemical Industry Association, " Industrial Propylene Glycol: Paints
& Table 68 Specification Sheet of Reflux Drum V-402
Coatings",
2017; Retrieved fromREFLUX DRUM, V-402
: https://www.propylene-glycol.com/industrial-
Item
propylene- : Reflux DrumDate : 7th December 2018
Code : V-402
glycol/paints-coatings
By : Joan Mary
4. The European Chemical
No.of unit :1 Industry Association, " Industrial Propylene Glycol:
Liquid GENERAL
Detergents",
Function : Distribution point for reflux and distillate for Distillation Column V-401
Operation
2017; Retrieved: ContinuousOrientation : Horizontal
from : https://www.propylene-glycol.com/industrial-
propylene- Material of Construction : Stainless Steel 316
glycol/paints-coatings
OPERATING DATA
Mass Flow Rate
5. The European Chemical Industry Association, " Industrial Propylene Glycol:
Temperature (K)461.054508736.96
Heat
Transfer Fluids", (ton/hr)
Pressure (bar)1
2017; Retrieved from : https://www.propylene-glycol.com/industrial-
Volumetric Flow Rate (m 3/h)38.975
propylene-3
glycol/paints-coatings
Density (kg/m )948.319
6. E. Mandl, "PropyleneOPERATIONAL DESIGN
Glycol in Food: Is This Additive Safe?" March 2018; Retrieved
3
from: of Drum (m )12.992Diameter of Drum (m)1.767
Volume
Length of Drum (m)5.300Hold Up Time (min)10
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/propylene-
* Kindly refer to appendix for detailed calculation steps
glycol
7. IHS Markit, “Propylene Glycols-Chemical Economics Handbook” , June 2017;
Retrieved
from:
https://ihsmarkit.com/products/propylene-glycols-chemical-economics-
handbook.html
8. Research and Markets, “Propylene Glycol Market 2017 - Global Forecast to 2021:
Rising
Demand for Bio-Based PG in Pharmaceutical & Cosmetics Application - Research
and
Markets”, May 2017; Retrieved from:
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170510005965/en/Propylene-
Glycol-
Market-2017---Global-Forecast
9. Market Research Future, “Propylene Glycol Market Research Report – Forecast to
2023”,
October 2018; Retrieved from:
https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/propylene-glycol-market-
5957
10. Ameri Research Inc. “Propylene Glycol Market Outlook to 2024: Key
Application
Categories (Unsaturated Polyester Resin, Pharmaceuticals, Antifreeze, Functional
Fluids,
165
166
Personal Care, Food, Liquid Detergents), Regional Segmentation, Competitive
Dynamics,
Pricing Analysis (OPP, IPP, RAP) And Segment Forecast”, May 2017; Retrieved
from:
https://www.ameriresearch.com/product/propylene-glycol-market-size-
analysis/
11. Report Linker Data, “Import of propylene glycol (propane-1,2-diol) to Malaysia: Drop
in
2017”, 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.reportlinker.com/data/series/NB-
JxrXtX84
12. Future Market Insights, “Propylene Glycol Market: Global Industry Analysis
and
Opportunity Assessment 2014 – 2020”, December 2017;
Retrieved
from:https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/global-propylene-glycol-
market
13. Markets and Markets, “Propylene Glycol Market worth 4.60 Billion USD by
2021”,
Retrieved from:
https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/propylene-
glycol.asp
14. Trade Accelerator, “Exports of Propylene Glycol”, Retrieved
from:
https://www.tradeaccelerator.co.uk/export/propylene-glycol?
q=&idx=Opportunities&p=5
15. ICIS News, “EU propylene glycol imports, exports soften in January – Eurostat”,
March
2015; Retrieved from:
https://www.icis.com/resources/news/2015/03/24/9870425/eu-
propylene-glycol-imports-exports-soften-in-january-
eurostat/
16. NEDIM E. ALTARAS, DOUGLAS C. CAMERON; "Metabolic Engineering of a 1,2-
Propanediol Pathway in Escherichia coli" Mar. 1999, Applied and
Environmental
Microbiology, p. 1180-1185.
167
21. Akiyama M, Sato S, Takahashi R, Inui K, Yokota M. “Dehydration–hydrogenation
of
glycerol into 1, 2-propanediol at ambient hydrogen pressure”. Applied
Catalysis A:
General. 2009 Dec 15;371(1-2):60-66.
22. Paivi Maki-Arvela, Irina L., Simakova, Tapio Salmi, Dmitry Yu. Murzin; “Production of
23. J. Xiao, Z. Huo, D. Ren, S. Zhang, J. Luo, G. Yao, F. Jin; “ A novel approach for 1,2-
propylene glycol production from biomass-derived lactic acid”,
Elsevier,2015.
24. K. Liu, X. Huang, E. A. Pidko, E. J. M. Hensen; “Hydrogenation of Lactic Acid to 1,2-
Propanediol over Ru-Based Catalyst” ChemCatChem,
2018.
25. Lennteach; “Ruthenium-Ru”. Retrieved
from:
https://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements/ru.ht
m
26. Zhang et.al.,United States Patent, “Condensed Phase Catalytic Hydrogenation of
Lactic
Acid to Propylene Glycol”, Jun.11,2002. Retrieved from:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US64038
44
27. Thermos Scientific; “Oxoid Technical Support Department Guidelines – Disposal
of
prepared Media” 2018. Retrieved from:
http://www.oxoid.com/UK/blue/techsupport/its.asp?
itsp=faq&faq=tsfaq004&cat=culture
+media
%2C+supplements+and+raw+materials&lang=EN&c=UK
28. Mohamad M.H. (2011). “A Review of Acetol: Application and Production”
American
Journal of Applied Sciences 8 (11): 1135-1139. Retrieved
from
http://thescipub.com/pdf/10.3844/ajassp.2011.1135.11
39
29. Thechemicalcompany; “Ethylene Glycol”; Retrieved
from:
https://thechemco.com/chemical/ethylene-
glycol/
30. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2006. Canadian soil
quality
guidelines for the protection of environmental and human health: Propylene
Glycol
(2006). In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian
Council of
Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg.
31. Dr. Axe, “Propylene Glycol: The Complicated Additive with Potentially Dangerous
Side
Effects”, September 2016; Retrieved from: https://draxe.com/propylene-
glycol/
168
32. Mechant Research & Consulting Ltd; "World Propylene Glycol Market to Reach
Supply-
Demand Balance in 2015" April 18, 2014. Retrieved
from
https://mcgroup.co.uk/news/20140418/propylene-glycol-market-reach-
supplydemand-
balance-2015.html
33. ICIS; "CHEMICAL PROFILE : Propylene glycol", ICIS Chemical Business, 07 July
2006.
34. Wahab, A.G.; "Malaysia-Biofuels:USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, United
States
Department of Agriculture" Kuala Lumpur, 2012.
169
47. Chemeo, “Chemical Properties of Methyl Alcohol”, 2016;
Retrieved:
https://www.chemeo.com/cid/69-136-5/Methyl
%20Alcohol
48. Chemeo, “Chemical Properties of Propylene Glycol”, 2016, Retrieved
from:
https://www.chemeo.com/cid/23-447-0/Propylene%20Glycol#ref-nist-
webbook
49. Wired Chemist, “Water”, Retrieved from:
http://www.wiredchemist.com/chemistry/data/entropies-
inorganic
50. Chemical Book, “ Chemical Product Property of Hydroxyacetone”, Retrieved
from:
https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB0714802.htmhttps:
//e
n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxyacetone
51. TGSC Information system, “Acetol Alcohol”, Retrieved from:
http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/data/rw1132561.ht
ml
52. Meglobal, “Physical Properties of Ethylene Glycol”, Retrieved
from:
https://www.meglobal.biz/monoethylene-glycol/physical-
properties
53. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Database;
Oct.
2018, Retrieved from:
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/753
54. Sigma-Aldrich, “Glycerol”, 2018, Retrieved from:
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sial/g9012?
lang=en®ion=MY
55. NIST Chemistry WebBook, “Hydrogen”, Retrieved from:
https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C1333740&Mask=4&Type=ANTOINE&Plot
=on#ANTOINE
56. NIST Chemistry WebBook, “Methyl Alcohol”, Retrieved
from:https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C67561&Mask=4&Type=ANTOINE&
Plot=on
57. Biology Dictionary, “Methanol”, 2017, Retrieved
from:
https://biologydictionary.net/methanol
/
58. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Database,
Oct.,
2018, Retrived from:
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/1030
59. Sigma-Aldrich, “Propylene Glycol”, 2018, Retrieved
from:
https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/substance/propyleneglycol76095755611?
lang=en
®ion=MY
60. ChemOkstate, “Vapor Pressure of Water”, Retrieved
from:
http://intro.chem.okstate.edu/1515sp01/database/vpwater.
html
170
61. StackExhange, “Water molecule properties”, Retrieved
from:
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/19979/do-water-molecules-change-
when-
you-talk-to-them
62. Masaki Akiyama a, Satoshi Sato a, *, Ryoji Takahashi b, Kanichiro Inui c,
Masahiro
Yokota d. (2009). Dehydration–hydrogenation of glycerol into 1,2-propanediol
at
ambient hydrogen pressure, 60-
66
63. IHS Markit; “Propylene Glycols-Chemical Economics Handbooks” June 2017.
Available
from https://ihsmarkit.com/products/propylene-glycols-chemical-
economics-
handbook.html
64. Merchant Research & Consulting Ltd; "World Propylene Glycol Market to
Reach
Supply-Demand Balance in 2015" April 18, 2014. Available
from
https://mcgroup.co.uk/news/20140418/propylene-glycol-market-reach-
supplydemand-
balance-2015.html
65. A. Lancia, D. Musmarra, F. Pepe; “Vapor-Liquid Equilibria for Mixture of
Ethylene
Glycol, Propylene glycol, and Water between 98˚ and 122˚C” Vol. 29 No.3,
1996.
66. Oleoline; “Refined Glycerine Market Report”, 2017. Available
from:
http://www.hbint.com/datas/media/59020503077a6e321ef1a253/weekly-
refined-
glycerine.pdf
67. Alibaba; “Ethylene Glycol Price” Retrieved from:
https://www.alibaba.com/ethylene-
glycol-price-suppliers.
68. Alibaba, “Acetol Prices” Retrieved from:
https://www.alibaba.com/trade/search?
fsb=y&IndexArea=company_en&CatId=&Search
Text=Acetol+price
69. Methanex; “Methanex Methanol Price Sheet” September 28, 2018. Available
from:
https://www.methanex.com/sites/default/files/methanol-price/Mx-Price-Sheet
%20-
%20Sep%2028%2C%202018.pdf
70. Alibaba, “Propylene glycol Prices” Retrieved
from:
https://www.alibaba.com/trade/search?
fsb=y&IndexArea=company_en&CatId=&Search
Text=propylene+glycol+price
71. Alibaba; “Cu-ZnO catalyst Price” Retrieved from:
https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/cuo-zno-al2o3-
catalyst.html
72. Alibaba; “NaOH liquid” Retrieved from:
https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/naoh+liquid.html?
fsb=y&IndexArea=product_en&C
atId=&SearchText=naoh+liquid&isGalleryList=G
171
73. J.B. Maverick; “Which segments of the chemicals sector have the highest
profit
margins?” Investopedia. Available from:
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/060115/which-segments-chemicals-
sector-
have-highest-profit-margins.asp(Accessed on 8 October
2018)
74. Tan HW, Aziz AA, Aroua MK. Glycerol production and its applications as a raw
material: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013 Nov 1;
27:118-27.
75. Cision PR Newswire, “Growing Opportunities in Emerging Economies Such as China
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-propylene-glycol-market-
forecasts-
2017-2021-growing-opportunities-in-emerging-economies-such-as-china-and-
india---
research-and-markets-
300457629.html.
76. Science Lab.com Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment, “Propylene Glycol MSDS”,
from:
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?
msdsId=9924168
79. Praxair Material Safety Data Sheet, “Hydrogen MSDS”, Retrieved from:
http://dept.harpercollege.edu/chemistry/msds/Hydrogen%20Compressed%20Gas
%20Pra
xair.pdf
80. Science Lab.com Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment, “Methanol MSDS”, Retrieved
from:
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?
msdsId=9927227
81. Science Lab.com Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment, “Water MSDS”, Retrieved
from:
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?
msdsId=9927321
82. Science Lab.com Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment, “Ethylene Glycol MSDS”,
172
83. Sykes Vet International Pty Ltd, “Acetol MSDS”, Retrieved from:
https://www.tasmanchemicals.com.au/pdf/Acetol.p
df
84. Alibaba; “Hydrogen gas Price” Retrieved
from:
https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/hydrogen+gas+price.html?
fsb=y&IndexArea=produ
ct_en&CatId=&SearchText=hydrogen+gas+price&isGalleryList=
G
TASk 2
85. Wang S, Liu H. “Selective hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol on Cu–
ZnO
catalysts”. Catalysis Letters. 2007 Aug 1;117(1-2):62-
7.
86. Gonzalez-Garay A, Gonzalez-Miquel M, Guillen-Gosalbez G. “High-Value Propylene
173
97. T. Maekawa, M. Kagawa, N. Nakajima, S. Nagata (1963); “Corrosion of Stainless
Steel
in High Temperature Water” Engineering and Research Laboratory, Mitsubishi
Atomic
Power Industries, Incoporated, Omiya, Japan.
98. What-When-How; “Description of Reactor: Multiphase catalytic packed-bed
reactor”
Retrieved from: http://what-when-how.com/petroleum-refining/description-of-
reactors-
petroleum-refining/
99. A. Foley; “What is a Packed Bed Reactor?” August 15, 2014. Retrieved
from:
https://www.comsol.com/blogs/packed-bed-
reactor/
100. British Stainless Steel Association; “What is Stainless Steel?” Retrieved
from:
https://www.bssa.org.uk/faq.php?id=1
101. NACE international; “Hydrogen Embrittlement” Retrieved
from:
https://www.nace.org/Corrosion-Central/Corrosion-101/Hydrogen-
Embrittlement/
102. Barthelemy H.; “Compatibility of Metallic Materials with Hydrogen: Review of
the
Present Knowledge” (2007) Available from:
http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2007/fileadmin/user_upload/CD/PAPERS/11SEPT/1.4.
6
6.pdf
103. Australian Stainless Steel Development Association (ASSDA); “Benefits of
Stainless
Steel” Retrieved from: http://www.assda.asn.su/benifits-of-stainless-
steel.
104. DESMI. ‘ESLH Centrifugal Pump’. Retrieved From:
https://www.desmi.com/desmi-
products/eslh-centrifugal-pump.aspx
105. Gavin Towler, Ray Sinnott. Chemical Engineering Design Principle, Practice
and
Economic of Plant and Process Design. 2nd Edition. Elsevier,
2013
106. James R. Couper, W. Roy Penney, James R. Fair, Stanley M. Walas.
Chemical
Process Equipment, Selection and Design. 3rd Edition. United State: Elsevier;
2012
107. WaterWorld, ‘The Impact of Component Material Selection on Pump
Reliability’
December 18, 2014. Retrieved from:
https://www.waterworld.com/articles/print/volume-
30/issue-12/inside-every-issue/pump-tips-techniques/the-impact-of-component-
material-
selection-on-pump-reliability.html
108. Max S. Peters, Klaus D. Timmerhaus. Plant Design and Economics for
Chemical
Engineer. 4th Edition. McGraw Hill
174
kQjMNAZdtnpIZnX6UuurAg9wUjXZw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjhlNG36ajeAhVIqo8K
HYvND0MQ4lYILSgC&biw=1242&bih=525&dpr=1.1#imgrc=zO7f47-Jfb_QOM:
110. Flash Drum Design, Retrieved from:
http://www.ou.edu/class/che-
design/design%201-2013/Flash
%20Design.pdf
111. Introduction to Chemical Engineering for Lecture 7: Flash Distillation, “ETH
Zurich,
Institute of Process Engineering, Sonneggstrasse 3, CH-8092
Zurich,Switzerland”,
Retrieved from: https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-
interest/mavt/process-
engineering/separation-processes-
laboratory-
dam/documents/education/bce%20notes/Lec7-
Flash.pdf
112. KLM Technology Group, “Practical Engineering Guidelines for Processing Plant”
,
Retrieved from :
Solutionshttp://kolmetz.com/pdf/EDG/ENGINEERING_DESIGN_GUIDELINE__separa
tor%20vessel_REV01.pdf
113. United Performance Metals Home, “Stainless Steel 316 and 316L”, Retrieved
from:
https://www.upmet.com/products/stainless-
steel/316316l
114. Thermopedia, Heat & Mass Transfer, and Fluids Engineering, “Distillation
Column”,
Retrieved from :
http://www.thermopedia.com/content/703/
175
Appendix A: Thermodynamic Data
Table 69 Thermodynamic Data
Ethylene
-451.5 (l) 145.20 (l)
[41]
Glycol -307.68 - - 9.11 56.9 -1179.5 (l)
[44]
-387.1 (g) 0.09975 (g)
[41]
Glycerol
[45]
-438.52 - - 12.27 - -665.9 (l) -1661.1 (l) 2.43 (l)
Hydrogen
[41] [46]
- 33.3 12.8 0.117 0.904 0 (g) -285.84 (g) 14.30 (g)
176
[41]
Water -237.2 (l) - -285.84 (l) 4.1852 (l)
647.4 218.3 6.0095 40.656 -
[49]
228.4(g) -241.83 (g) 1.8670 (g)
0.2552 at
Acetol [50] [51] C3H6O2 74.08 Colorless / Liquid 1.082 -17 145
25℃
Ethylene 0.00067 at
C2H6O2 62.07 Colorless / Liquid 1.113 -13 197.2
Glycol [41] [52] 20℃
[41]
Hydrogen 320.59 at -
H2 2.016 Colorless / Gas - -259.19 -252.76 H-H
[55] 248.15℃
177
[41]
Methanol
CH3OH 32.04 Colorless / Liquid 0.792 -97.9 64.7 0.37 at 25℃
[56] [57]
Propylene 0.017 at
C3H8O2 76.095 Colorless / Liquid 1.0361 -59 188.2
Glycol [58] [59] 25℃
[41] [60]
Water
H 2O 18.016 Odorless / Liquid 1.000 0 100 3.17 at 25℃
[49]
178
Appendix B: Material Safety Data Sheet
Material Safety Data Sheet is important when handling the raw materials and reactants
in the
production plant. This is because it is useful for future reference for the workers and
employees especially if emergency occurs. Besides, MSDS were provided by Science
Lab.com, Chemicals and Laboratory Equipment that can be retrieved from online
website.
There are a total of eight components involved in the chosen process which are
classified into
reactant, product and by-product. Based on the MSDS below, methanol is the most
hazardous
components that contribute to health risk and environmental
impact.
B.1 Material Safety Datasheet of Propylene Glycol [76]
Details
b. Formula CH3CHOHCH2OH
Hazards Identification
179
Chronic Prolonged skin exposure has caused irritation in
16% of dermatitis patients. Irritation
seen in normal people appears to have been
caused
by local osmotic dehydration of skin
which disappeared rapidly after product
removed.
c. Potential Health Effects of Repeated Exposures
First Aid
180
Get medical attention.
Small Spill:
Dilute with water and mop up, or absorb with an inert dry material and place in an
appropriate waste disposal container. Finish cleaning by spreading water on the
contaminated surface and dispose of according to local and regional authority
requirements.
Large Spill:
Absorb with an inert material and put the spilled material in an appropriate waste
disposal. Finish cleaning by spreading water on the contaminated surface and allow
to
evacuate through the sanitary system. Be careful that the product is not present at a
concentration level above TLV. Check TLV on the MSDS and with local
authorities
181
Handling and Storage
Full Body Protection Splash goggles. Full suit. Vapour respirator. Boots.
Gloves. A self-contained breathing apparatus
should
be used to avoid inhalation of the product.
Suggested protective clothing might not be
sufficient; consult a specialist before handling this
product.
182
Specific Gravity 1.036
Toxicological Information
183
Ecological Information
Toxicity of the Products of The products of degradation are less toxic than the
Biodegradation product itself.
Disposal
Details
b. Formula C3H8O3
Hazards Identification
184
Hence, need to practice appropriate
handling
precautions.
First Aid
185
Flammable Limits Not available
Storage Hygroscopic.
Keep container tightly closed and in a cool
and well-ventilated area.
186
Lab coat must be worn when handling the
chemical products to prevent skin
exposure.
Long sleeved clothing which are chemical
resistant is significant when handling the
chemicals.
b. Reactivity Hygroscopic
187
Hazardous Decomposition Products Thermal decomposition release CO and CO2
Toxicological Information
Toxicity to Animals (LD 50) (ORAL) 8000 mg/kg (mouse) and 7750 mg/kg
(Guinea Pig).
Ecological Information
Disposal
Details
b. Formula H2
Hazards Identification
188
Burns with invisible flame.
May cause dizziness and drowsiness.
Self-contained breathing apparatus may be
required
by rescue workers.
Under ambient conditions, this is a colorless,
odorless, tasteless gas
Route of Entry
Symptoms
189
consciousness
Medical Conditions Aggravated The toxicology and the physical and chemical
by Overexposure properties of hydrogen suggest that overexposure
is
unlikely to aggravate existing medical
conditions.
Carcinogenicity This product is not listed by NTP, OSHA or IARC
First Aid
190
personnel may give oxygen. Call a
physician.
Fires and Explosion
Autoignition 570°C
191
in large areas, use unmanned hose holder or
monitor
nozzles; if this is not possible, withdraw from area
and allow fire to burn.
Environmental Precautions: As the gas is lighter than air, ensure that hydrogen gas
is not
trapped in confine space. Otherwise this could lead to the formation of a highly
explosive
gas-air mixture. Ventilate all confined area using forced draught if necessary. Ensure
that
all electrically powered equipment is
flameproof.
192
cylinders separately. Use a first-in, first-out
inventory system to prevent storing full cylinders
for
long periods.
193
cylinder pressure. Close valve after each use and
when empty. Protect cylinders from physical
damage; do not drag, roll, slide, or drop. Use a
suitable hand truck for cylinder movement. Use
only
non-sparking tools. Avoid contact with eyes, skin
and clothing. Empty containers retain product
residue and can be hazardous. Store and use away
from heat, sparks, open flame or any other ignition
source. Use explosion-proof electrical (ventilating,
lighting and material handling)
equipment.
Personal Protection/Exposure Control
194
assessment indicates a higher degree of
protection:
safety glasses with sideshields.
Appearance Colorless
Odor Odorless
195
Solubility in Water 0.019 vol/vol at 60°F (15.6°C)
Toxicological Information
Acute Toxicity
Hydrogen (1333-74-0)
Ecological Information
As hydrogen is lighter than air it will disperse rapidly in open areas. It does not pose
a
hazard to the ecology.
Disposal
196
Disposal Methods Small amounts may be blown to the atmosphere under controlled
conditions. No source of ignition should be in the vicinity. Large amounts should only
be
handled by the gas supplier. Disposal of Packaging The disposal of cylinders must
only
be handled by the gas supplier.
Details
b. Formula CH3OH
Hazards Identification
197
Carcinogenicity No known carcinogenic chemicals in
methanol.
First Aid
198
Hazardous combustion products Forms an explosive mixture with air due to
its low flash point It boils violently and
explodes. Release carbon oxides.
Methanol is a flammable liquid. Hence, keep it away from heat and sources of
ignition.
If small spill, dilute with water and mop up, or absorb with an inert dry material
and
Place in an appropriate waste disposal container according to local
regulations.
Use personal protective equipment and evacuate surrounding areas. No action shall be
taken
involving personal risk without proper instruction from safety
department.
Avoid breathing vapors, mist or gas. Self-contained breathing apparatus need to be
used
when there is inadequate
ventilation.
Inform the authorities and get licensed permission to dispose the harmful
waste.
Smoking or any ignition source is prohibited near the spillage
area.
Handling and Storage
smoke.
Take measures to prevent the buildup of
electrostatic charge.
199
that are impervious to methyl alcohol should
be worn to prevent repeated or prolonged
skin contact.
Appearance, odor and state Clear, Colorless liquid and alcohol odor.
Toxicological Information
200
(LD50) (DERMAL) 15800 mg/kg (rabbit)
Ecological Information
Disposal
Details
g. Formula H2 O
Hazards Identification
201
Target Organs Not available
Medical Conditions Aggravated by Non -corrosive for skin. Non-irritant for skin. Non-
Overexposure permeator by skin. Non-irritating to the eyes. Non-
hazardous in case of ingestion. Non-hazardous in
case of inhalation. Non-irritant for lungs. Non-
sensitizer for lungs.
First Aid
Small Spill:
Mop up or absorb with an inert dry material and place in an appropriate waste disposal
container.
Large Spill:
Absorb with an inert material and put the spilled material in an appropriate waste
disposal.
Handling and Storage
202
Exposure Limits Not available
Appearance Liquid
Odor Odorless
Specific Gravity 1
Toxicological Information
Ecological Information
203
Products of Biodegradation: Possibly hazardous short term degradation products are not
likely. However, long term degradation products may
arise.
Toxicity of the Products of Biodegradation: The product itself and its products of
degradation are not toxic.
Disposal
Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental
control
regulations.
Details
b. Formula HOCH2CH2OH
Hazards Identification
204
collapse, pulmonary edema, hypocalcemic tetany,
and severe metabolic acidosis. Without treatment,
death may occur in 8 to 24 hours. Victim who
survive initial toxicity period usually develop renal
failure along with brain and liver damage.
Exposure
to and/or consumption of alcohol may increase
toxic
effect.
First Aid
205
Autoignition 398°C (748.4°F)
Extinguishing Media Use dry chemical powder for small fire and use
water spray, fog or foam and do not use water jet
for
large fire.
Small Spill:
Dilute with water and mop up or absorb with an inert dry material and place in an
appropriate
waste disposal container. Finish cleaning by spreading water on the contaminated
surface and
dispose of according to local and regional authority
requirements.
Large Spill:
Stop leak if without risk. Do not get water inside container. Do not touch spilled
material.
Use water spray to reduce vapors. Prevent entry into sewers, basements or confined
areas;
dike if needed. Eliminate all ignition source. Call for assistance on disposal. Finish
cleaning
by spreading water on the contaminated surface and allow to evacuate through the
sanitary
system. Be careful that the product is not present at a concentration level above TLV.
Check
TLV on the MSDS and with local authorities.
206
Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Keep away from
incompatibles such as oxidizing agents, reducing
agents, acids, alkalis.
Full Body Protection Splash googles. Full suit. Boots. Gloves. Suggested
protective clothing might not sufficient; consult a
specialist BEFORE handling this product.
Odor Odorless
207
Vapor Pressure 0.06 mmHg @ 20°C; 0.092 mmHg at 25°C
Toxicological Information
Ecotoxicity
Products of Biodegradation: Ecotoxicity in water (LC50): 41000mg/l 96 hours
Toxicity of the Products of [Fish (Trout)]. 46300 mg/l 48 hours [water flea].
208
Biodegradation: The products of 34250 mg/l 96 hours [fish (bluegill fish)]. 34250
degradation are less toxic than mg/l 72 hours [Fish (Goldfish)].
the
product itself.
Special Remarks on the Products of
Biodegradation: Not available.
Disposal
Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environment
control
regulation.
Details
b. Formula C3H6O2
Hazards Identification
209
d. Acute Potential Health Effects
First Aid
210
Fires and Explosion
Autoignition 280°C/536°F
Methods for Containment and Clean Up: Soak with inert absorbent material. Keep in
suitable, closed containers for disposal. Remove all sources of ignition. Use spark-proof
tools
and explosion-proof equipment.
Special Precaution
211
Engineering Measures Ensure there is sufficient ventilation of the area.
Ensure lighting and electrical equipment are not a
source of ignition.
Appearance Colorless
Odor Characteristic
State Liquid
pH 3.4 (50%)
212
Ecological Information
Disposal
213
Appendix C: Mass Balance on Individual Unit
Pump (P-101)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 1 3
303.00 352.42
Temperature (K)
1.00 40.00
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Mass flow rate Mass flow rate
Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr)
Molar flow rate Molar flow rate
1.0010.98 1.0010.98
Components (kmol/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mass fraction
0.000.00 0.000.00
Glycerol 119.22 1.00 119.22 1.00
0.000.00 0.000.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.000.00 0.000.00
Propylene Glycol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.000.00 0.000.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.000.00 0.000.00
Methanol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.000.00 0.000.00
Acetol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.0010.98 1.0010.98
Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10.98 10.98
Total 119.22 1.00 119.22 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr)
214
C.2 Heat Exchanger (E-101)
215
C.3 Compressor (C-101)
Compressor (C-101)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 2 5
303.00 328.66
Temperature (K)
1.00 40.00
Pressure (bar)
1.00 1.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Hydrogen 396.05 1.000.80 1.00 396.05 1.000.80 1.00
Propylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Total 396.05 1.000.80 1.00 396.05 1.000.80 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 0.80 0.80
216
C.4 Mixing Point
Mixing Point
Study Node
217
C.5 Heat Exchanger (E-102)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 6 7
500.11 473.00
Temperature (K)
40.00 40.00
Pressure (bar)
1.00 1.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Hydrogen 596.12 1.001.20 0.11 596.12 1.001.20 0.11
Propylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Total 596.12 1.001.20 0.11 596.12 1.001.20 0.11
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 1.20 1.20
218
C.6 Packed Bed Reactor (R-101)
Study Node
219
C.7 Condenser (E-103)
Condenser (E-103)
E-103
COOLING WATER
INLET OUTLET
Stream 8 10
473.00 473.00
Temperature (K)
40.00 40.00
Pressure (bar)
1.00 1.00
Vapor Fraction
Mass flow rate Mass flow rate
Molar flow rate Mole fraction(ton/hr) Molar flow rate Mole fraction(ton/hr)
(kmol/hr) 0.032.03 (kmol/hr) 0.032.03
Components Mass fraction Mass fraction
22.06 0.701.01 22.06 0.701.01
Glycerol 0.17 0.17
500.18 0.137.09 500.18 0.137.09
Hydrogen 0.08 0.08
93.22 0.000.17 93.22 0.000.17
Propylene Glycol 0.58 0.58
2.72 0.000.09 2.72 0.000.09
Ethylene Glycol 0.01 0.01
2.72 0.000.09 2.72 0.000.09
Methanol 0.01 0.01
1.23 0.131.70 1.23 0.131.70
Acetol 0.01 0.01
94.45 1.0012.18 94.45 1.0012.18
Water 0.14 0.14
716.57 12.18 716.57 12.18
Total 1.00 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr)
220
C.8 Heat Exchanger (E-104)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 10 11
473.00 609.00
Temperature (K)
40.00 40.00
Pressure (bar)
1.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.032.03 0.19 22.06 0.032.03 0.19
Hydrogen 500.18 0.701.01 0.09 500.18 0.701.01 0.09
Propylene Glycol 93.22 0.137.09 0.65 93.22 0.137.09 0.65
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.000.17 0.02 2.72 0.000.17 0.02
Methanol 2.72 0.000.09 0.01 2.72 0.000.09 0.01
Acetol 1.23 0.000.09 0.01 1.23 0.000.09 0.01
Water 94.45 0.131.70 0.15 94.45 0.131.70 0.15
Total 716.57 1.0012.18 1.11 716.57 1.0012.18 1.11
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 12.18 12.18
221
C.9 Flash Drum (V-101)
Study Node
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.032.03 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0022.06 0.10 2.03 0.18
Hydrogen 500.18 0.701.01 0.08 500.18 1.00 1.01 1.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.22 0.137.09 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0093.22 0.43 7.09 0.63
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.000.17 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.72 0.01 0.17 0.02
Methanol 2.72 0.000.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.002.72 0.01 0.09 0.01
Acetol 1.23 0.000.09 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001.23 0.01 0.09 0.01
Water 94.45 0.131.70 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0094.45 0.44 1.70 0.15
Total 716.57 1.0012.18 1.00 500.18 1.00 1.01 1.00216.39 1.00 11.17 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 12.18 12.18
222
C.10 Splitting Point
Study Node
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hydrogen 500.18 1.001.01 1.00 200.07 1.00 0.40 1.00300.11 1.00 0.60 1.00
Propylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 500.18 1.001.01 1.00 200.07 1.00 0.40 1.00300.11 1.00 0.60 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 1.01 1.01
223
C.11 Expander (D-101)
Expander (D-101)
15
Study Node 12
D-101
INLET OUTLET
Stream 12 15
609.00 532.62
Temperature (K)
40.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.102.03 0.18 22.06 0.102.03 0.18
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.22 0.437.09 0.63 93.22 0.437.09 0.63
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.010.17 0.02 2.72 0.010.17 0.02
Methanol 2.72 0.010.09 0.01 2.72 0.010.09 0.01
Acetol 1.23 0.010.09 0.01 1.23 0.010.09 0.01
Water 94.45 0.441.70 0.15 94.45 0.441.70 0.15
Total 216.39 1.0011.17 1.00 216.39 1.0011.17 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 11.17 11.17
224
C.12 Heat Exchanger (E-201)
E-201
Study Node 15 16
STEAM
INLET OUTLET
Stream 15 16
532.62 446.49
Temperature (K)
1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.102.03 0.18 22.06 0.102.03 0.18
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.22 0.437.09 0.63 93.22 0.437.09 0.63
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.010.17 0.02 2.72 0.010.17 0.02
Methanol 2.72 0.010.09 0.01 2.72 0.010.09 0.01
Acetol 1.23 0.010.09 0.01 1.23 0.010.09 0.01
Water 94.45 0.441.70 0.15 94.45 0.441.70 0.15
Total 216.39 1.0011.17 1.00 216.39 1.0011.17 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 11.17 11.17
225
C.13 Distillation Column (V-201)
17 18
E-202
Cooling water
V-202
19 20
Study Node
16 V-201
22
E-203
23
21
INLET OUTLET
Stream 19
16 22 17 21
446.49 374.38 467.65 374.38 467.65
Temperature (K)
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.10 2.03 0.18 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0022.06 0.09 2.03 0.10
Hydrogen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.22 0.43 7.09 0.63 0.01 0.000.00 0.00 133.25 0.97 10.14 0.98 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00226.44 0.89 17.23 0.88
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.01 0.17 0.02 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 3.89 0.03 0.24 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006.61 0.03 0.41 0.02
Methanol 2.72 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.53 0.030.02 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.25 0.03 0.10 0.050.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 1.23 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.24 0.010.02 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.46 0.01 0.11 0.050.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 94.45 0.44 1.70 0.15 18.23 0.960.33 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.67 0.96 2.03 0.900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 216.39 1.00 11.17 1.00 18.99 1.000.36 1.00 137.14 1.00 10.38 1.00 117.42 1.00 2.24 1.00255.11 1.00 19.67 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 21.92 21.92
226
C.14 Condenser (E-202)
Condenser (E-202)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 17 18
374.38 374.38
Temperature (K)
1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
1.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 0.03 0.000.00 0.00 0.03 0.000.00 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Methanol 3.25 0.030.10 0.05 3.25 0.030.10 0.05
Acetol 1.46 0.010.11 0.05 1.46 0.010.11 0.05
Water 112.67 0.962.03 0.90 112.67 0.962.03 0.90
Total 117.42 1.002.24 1.00 117.42 1.002.24 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 2.24 2.24
227
C.15 Reflux Drum (V-202)
Study Node
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 0.03 0.000.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.000.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Methanol 3.25 0.030.10 0.05 0.53 0.03 0.02 0.052.72 0.03 0.09 0.05
Acetol 1.46 0.010.11 0.05 0.24 0.01 0.02 0.051.23 0.01 0.09 0.05
Water 112.67 0.962.03 0.90 18.23 0.96 0.33 0.9094.45 0.96 1.70 0.90
Total 117.42 1.002.24 1.00 18.99 1.00 0.36 1.0098.42 1.00 1.88 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 2.24 2.24
228
C.16 Reboiler (E-203)
Study Node
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.092.03 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0022.06 0.19 2.03 0.22
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 226.44 0.8917.23 0.88 133.25 0.97 10.14 0.9893.19 0.95 7.09 0.76
Ethylene Glycol 6.61 0.030.41 0.02 3.89 0.03 0.24 0.022.72 0.03 0.17 0.02
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 255.11 1.0019.67 1.00 137.14 1.00 10.38 1.00117.97 1.16 9.29 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 19.67 19.67
229
C.17 Pump (P-301)
Pump (P-301)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 23 24
467.65 542.25
Temperature (K)
1.00 1.01
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.192.03 0.22 22.06 0.192.03 0.22
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.19 0.797.09 0.76 93.19 0.797.09 0.76
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.020.17 0.02 2.72 0.020.17 0.02
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Total 117.97 1.009.29 1.00 117.97 1.009.29 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 9.29 9.29
230
C.18 Heat Exchanger (E-301)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 24 25
542.25 558.00
Temperature (K)
1.01 1.01
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.192.03 0.22 22.06 0.192.03 0.22
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.19 0.797.09 0.76 93.19 0.797.09 0.76
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.020.17 0.02 2.72 0.020.17 0.02
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Total 117.97 1.009.29 1.00 117.97 1.009.29 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 9.29 9.29
231
C.19 Distillation Column (V-301)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 28
25 40 26 39
558.00 461.35 558.45 461.35 558.45
Temperature (K)
1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 22.06 0.19 2.03 0.22 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 5.69 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0027.75 1.00 2.56 1.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.19 0.79 7.09 0.76 11.45 0.970.87 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104.65 0.97 7.96 0.980.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.02 0.17 0.02 0.33 0.030.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.05 0.03 0.19 0.020.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Methanol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 117.97 1.00 9.29 1.00 11.79 1.000.89 1.00 5.69 1.00 0.52 1.00 107.70 1.00 8.15 1.0027.75 1.00 2.56 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 10.71 10.71
232
C.20 Condenser (E-302)
Condenser (E-302)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 26 27
461.35 461.35
Temperature (K)
1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
1.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 104.65 0.977.96 0.98 104.65 0.977.96 0.98
Ethylene Glycol 3.05 0.030.19 0.02 3.05 0.030.19 0.02
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Total 107.70 1.008.15 1.00 107.70 1.008.15 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 8.15 8.15
233
C.21 Reflux Drum (V-302)
Assumption: Reflux ratio = 0.12
Study Node
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 104.65 0.977.96 0.98 11.45 0.97 0.87 0.9893.19 0.97 7.09 0.98
Ethylene Glycol 3.05 0.030.19 0.02 0.33 0.03 0.02 0.022.72 0.03 0.17 0.02
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 107.70 1.008.15 1.00 11.79 1.00 0.89 1.0095.91 1.00 7.26 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 8.15 8.15
234
C.22 Reboiler (E-303)
Study Node
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 27.75 1.002.56 1.00 5.69 1.00 0.52 1.0022.05 1.00 2.03 0.22
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 27.75 1.002.56 1.00 5.69 1.00 0.52 1.0022.05 1.00 2.03 0.22
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 2.56 2.56
235
C.23 Pump (P-401)
Pump (P-401)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 29 30
461.35 535.39
Temperature (K)
1.00 1.01
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.19 0.977.09 0.98 93.19 0.977.09 0.98
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.030.17 0.02 2.72 0.030.17 0.02
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Total 95.91 1.007.26 1.00 95.91 1.007.26 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 7.26 7.26
236
C.24 Heat Exchanger (E-401)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 30 31
535.39 461.97
Temperature (K)
1.01 1.01
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00
Vapor Fraction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.19 0.977.09 0.98 93.19 0.977.09 0.98
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.030.17 0.02 2.72 0.030.17 0.02
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Total 95.91 1.007.26 1.00 95.91 1.007.26 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 7.26 7.26
237
C.25 Distillation Column (V-401)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 34
31 37 32 36
461.97 461.05 470.44 461.05 470.44
Temperature (K)
1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Vapor Friction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 93.19 0.97 7.09 0.98 391.86 1.0029.82 1.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 485.04 1.00 36.91 1.000.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.03 0.17 0.02 0.69 0.000.04 0.00 0.37 0.99 0.02 0.99 0.85 0.00 0.05 0.002.92 0.99 0.18 0.99
Methanol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 95.91 1.00 7.26 1.00 392.55 1.0029.86 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.02 1.00 485.89 1.00 36.96 1.002.95 1.00 0.18 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 37.14 37.14
238
C.26 Condenser (E-402)
Condenser (E-402)
Study Node
INLET OUTLET
Stream 32 33
461.05 461.05
Temperature (K)
1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
1.00 0.00
Vapor Friction
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 485.04 1.0036.91 1.00 485.04 1.0036.91 1.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.85 0.000.05 0.00 0.85 0.000.05 0.00
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00
Total 485.89 1.0036.96 1.00 485.89 1.0036.96 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 36.96 36.96
239
C.27 Reflux drum (V-402)
Study Node
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 485.04 1.0036.91 1.00 391.86 1.00 29.82 1.0093.17 1.00 7.09 1.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.85 0.000.05 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.04 0.000.16 0.00 0.01 0.00
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 485.89 1.0036.96 1.00 392.55 1.00 29.86 1.0093.34 1.00 7.10 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 36.96 36.96
240
C.28 Reboiler (E-403)
Study Node
Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate Molar flow rate Mass flow rate
Components (kmol/hr) Mole fraction(ton/hr) Mass fraction (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (ton/hr) Mass fraction
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Propylene Glycol 0.02 0.010.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.010.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
Ethylene Glycol 2.92 0.990.18 0.99 0.37 0.99 0.02 0.992.56 0.99 0.16 0.99
Methanol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 2.95 1.000.18 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.02 1.002.58 1.00 0.16 1.00
Mass Balance (ton/hr) 0.18 0.18
241
C.29 Overall Mass Balance of Streams
Stream No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Temperature
(deg_C) 30.00 30.00 79.42 200.00 55.66 227.11 200.00 200.00 336.00 200.00 336.00 336.00
Pressure (bar)
1.00 1.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
Vapor Fraction
0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total Mole Flow 119.22 396.05 119.22 119.22 396.05 596.12 596.12 716.57 200.07 716.57 716.57 216.39
Rate (kmol/hr)
Total Mass Flow 10.98 0.80 10.98 10.98 0.80 1.20 1.20 12.18 0.40 12.18 12.18 11.17
Rate (ton/hr)
242
Table 72 Mass Balance of Overall Stream Balance (Stream 13-Stream 24)
Stream No. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Temperature
(deg_C) 336.00 336.00 259.62 173.49 101.38 101.38 101.38 101.38 194.65 194.65 194.65 269.25
Pressure (bar)
40.00 40.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01
Vapor Fraction
1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total Mole Flow 500.18 300.11 216.39 216.39 117.42 117.42 18.99 98.42 255.11 137.14 117.97 117.97
Rate (kmol/hr)
Total Mass Flow 1.01 0.60 11.17 11.17 2.24 2.24 0.36 1.88 19.67 10.38 9.29 9.29
Rate (ton/hr)
243
Table 73 Mass Balance of Overall Stream Balance (Stream 25-Stream 36)
Stream No. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Temperature
(deg_C) 285.00 188.35 188.35 188.35 188.35 262.39 188.97 188.05 188.05 188.05 188.05 197.44
Pressure (bar)
1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Vapor Fraction
0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Mole Flow 117.97 107.70 107.70 11.79 95.91 95.91 95.91 485.89 485.89 392.55 93.34 2.95
Rate (kmol/hr)
Total Mass Flow 9.29 8.15 8.15 0.89 7.26 7.26 7.26 36.96 36.96 29.86 7.10 0.18
Rate (ton/hr)
244
Table 74 Mass Balance of Overall Stream Balance (Stream 37-Stream 41)
Stream No. 37 38 39 40 41
Temperature
(deg_C) 197.44 197.44 285.45 285.45 285.45
Pressure (bar)
Vapor Fraction 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
3
Study Node 1
P-101
INLET OUTLET
Stream 1 3
Gamma Temperature (K)303.00 Temperature (K)352.42
1.36 Pressure (bar)1.00 Pressure (bar)40.00
Molar flowSpecific Molar flow
rateEnthalpyEnergy Flow rateSpecific Enthalpy Energy Flow
Components (kmol/hr)Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr) (kmol/hr)Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
119.221.00-665.90-79390.94 119.221.00-665.89-79390.23
0.000.000.030.00 0.000.000.030.00
Glycerol 0.000.00-500.040.00 0.000.00-489.960.00
Hydrogen 0.000.00-450.750.00 0.000.00-442.900.00
Propylene Glycol 0.000.00-238.190.00 0.000.00-233.840.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.000.00-369.300.00 0.000.00-361.290.00
Methanol 0.000.00-285.460.00 0.000.00-281.740.00
Acetol 119.221.00-2509.61-79390.94 119.221.00-2475.60-79390.23
Water -79390.94 -79390.23
Total -
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr) 0.20
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
246
F.2 Heat Exchanger (E-101)
E-101
Study Node
3 4
STEAM
INLET OUTLET
Stream 3 4
352.42 473.00
Temperature (K) 40.00 40.00
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 1.00-665.89 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
119.22 0.000.03 119.22
0.00-489.96 -79390.23 1.00-665.88-79388.18
Glycerol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.030.00
Hydrogen 0.00 0.00-442.90 0.00
0.00-233.84 0.00 0.00-460.800.00
Propylene Glycol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-420.700.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00-361.29 0.00
0.00-281.74 0.00 0.00-219.710.00
Methanol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-336.150.00
Acetol 0.00 1.00-2475.60 0.00
-79390.23 0.00 0.00-272.390.00
Water 119.22 -79390.23 119.22 1.00-2375.61-79388.18
Total -79388.18
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
2.05
-
247
D.3 Compressor (C-101)
Compressor (C-101)
Study Node 2 5
C-101
INLET OUTLET
Stream 2 5
Gamma Temperature (K)303.00 Temperature (K)328.66
1.20 Pressure (bar)1.00 Pressure (bar)40.00
Molar flowSpecific Molar flow
rateEnthalpyEnergy Flow rateSpecific Enthalpy Energy Flow
Components (kmol/hr)Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr) (kmol/hr)Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
0.000.00-665.900.00 0.000.00-665.900.00
396.051.000.0310.94 396.051.000.28109.39
Glycerol
0.000.00-500.040.00 0.000.00-494.940.00
Hydrogen
0.000.00-450.750.00 0.000.00-446.770.00
Propylene Glycol
0.000.00-238.190.00 0.000.00-236.010.00
Ethylene Glycol
0.000.00-369.300.00 0.000.00-365.260.00
Methanol
0.000.00-285.460.00 0.000.00-283.530.00
Acetol
396.051.00-2509.6110.94 396.051.00-2492.14109.39
Water
10.94 109.39
Total
-
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
27.35
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
248
D.4 Mixing Point
Mixing Point
Study Node
249
D.5 Heat Exchanger (E-102)
E-102
Study Node 6 7
STEAM
INLET OUTLET
Stream 6 7
500.11 473.00
Temperature (K) 40.00 40.00
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 0.00-665.87 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
0.00 1.000.03 0.00
0.00-453.35 0.00 0.00-665.880.00
Glycerol 596.12 16.72 596.12 1.000.0316.61
Hydrogen 0.00 0.00-415.17 0.00
0.00-215.60 0.00 0.00-460.800.00
Propylene Glycol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-420.700.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00-328.97 0.00
0.00-270.17 0.00 0.00-219.710.00
Methanol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-336.150.00
Acetol 0.00 1.00-2349.10 0.00
16.72 0.00 0.00-272.390.00
Water 596.12 16.72 596.12 1.00-2375.6116.61
Total 16.61
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-0.11
-
250
D.6 Packed Bed Reactor (R-101)
Study Node
R-101
7 8
251
D.7 Condenser (E-103)
Condenser (E-103)
E-103
COOLING WATER
INLET OUTLET
Stream 8 10
473.00 473.00
Temperature (K) 40.00 40.00
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 0.03-665.88 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
22.06 0.700.03 22.06
0.13-460.80 -14686.81 0.03-665.88-14686.81
Glycerol 500.18 13.94 500.18 0.700.0313.94
Hydrogen 93.22 0.00-420.70 93.22
0.00-201.16 -42955.37 0.13-460.80-42955.37
Propylene Glycol 2.72 -1144.60 2.72 0.00-420.70-1144.60
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.00-336.15 2.72
0.13-241.80 -547.29 0.00-219.71-597.76
Methanol 1.23 -412.73 1.23 0.00-336.15-412.73
Acetol 94.45 1.00-2326.46 94.45
-82569.73 -22836.86 0.13-272.39-25726.53
Water 716.57 -82569.73 716.57 1.00-2375.61-85509.87
Total -85509.87
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-2940.14
-
252
D.8 Heat Exchanger (E-104)
E-104
Study Node 10 7
11
STEAM
INLET OUTLET
Stream 10 11
473.00 609.00
Temperature (K) 40.00 40.00
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 0.03-665.88 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
22.06 0.700.03 22.06
0.13-460.80 -14686.81 0.030.051.03
Glycerol 500.18 13.94 500.18 0.700.0314.46
Hydrogen 93.22 0.00-420.70 93.22
0.00-219.71 -42955.37 0.1380.857537.04
Propylene Glycol 2.72 -1144.60 2.72 0.0060.37164.24
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.00-336.15 2.72
0.13-272.39 -597.76 0.0044.16120.13
Methanol 1.23 -412.73 1.23 0.0077.7195.41
Acetol 94.45 1.00-2375.61 94.45
-85509.87 -25726.53 0.1326.202474.94
Water 716.57 -85509.87 716.57 1.00289.3710407.25
Total 10407.25
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
95917.12
-
253
D.9 Flash Drum (V-101)
13
12
254
D.10 Splitting Point
Splitting Point
Study Node
255
D.11 Expander (D-101)
Expander (D-101)
15
Study Note 12
D-101
INLET OUTLET
Stream 12 15
Gamma Temperature (K) 609.00 Temperature (K) 532.62
1.08 Pressure (bar) 40.00 Pressure (bar) 1.00
256
D.12 Heat Exchanger (E-201)
E-201
Study Node
15 16
STEAM
INLET OUTLET
Stream 15 16
532.62 446.49
Temperature (K) 1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 0.10-665.87 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
22.06 0.000.03 22.06
0.43-443.99 -14686.60 0.10-665.88-14686.90
Glycerol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.030.00
Hydrogen 93.22 0.01-408.28 93.22
0.01-210.11 -41388.43 0.43-467.77-43604.70
Propylene Glycol 2.72 -1110.80 2.72 0.01-425.93-1158.83
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.01-319.42 2.72
0.44-267.36 -571.64 0.01-223.36-607.69
Methanol 1.23 -392.18 1.23 0.01-342.56-420.59
Acetol 94.45 1.00-2315.00 94.45
-83400.95 -25251.30 0.44-274.51-25926.17
Water 216.39 -83400.95 216.39 1.00-2399.97-86404.88
Total -86404.88
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-3003.93
-
257
D.13 Distillation Column (V-201)
17 18
E-202
Cooling water
V-202
19 20
Study Node
16 V-201
22
E-203
23
21
INLET OUTLET
Stream 19
16 22 17 21
446.49 374.38 467.65 374.38 467.65
Temperature (K) 1.00
Pressure (bar) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Specific Specific Specific Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow Enthalpy
Components rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) 0.10-665.88 (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) 0.00-665.88 (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) 0.0000-665.89 (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) 0.0865-665.88 (MJ/hr)
22.06 0.000.03 -14686.900.00 0.00-665.890.000.00 0.000.03 0.000.0000 0.00000.03 0.000022.0564 0.00000.03 -14686.8308
Glycerol 0.00 0.43-467.77 0.000.00 0.000.030.000.00 0.97-429.69 0.000.0000 0.0003-429.6074 0.00000.0000 0.8876-462.23 0.0000
Hydrogen 93.22 0.01-425.93 -43604.700.01 0.00-485.13-2.62133.25 0.03-357.37 -57256.910.0334 0.0000-439.1731 -14.3327226.4426 0.0259-421.77 -104668.9359
Propylene Glycol 2.72 0.01-223.36 -1158.830.00 0.00-439.170.003.89 0.00-201.16 -1390.280.0000 0.0276-201.1607 0.00006.6109 0.0000-220.48 -2788.3219
Ethylene Glycol 2.72 0.01-342.56 -607.690.53 0.03-231.69-121.640.00 0.00-291.29 0.003.2457 0.0125-291.2904 -652.90830.0000 0.0000-337.49 0.0000
Methanol 1.23 0.44-274.51 -420.590.24 0.01-357.39-84.660.00 0.00-272.82 -0.101.4644 0.9596-241.7966 -426.57940.0006 0.0000-272.82 -0.2014
Acetol 94.45 1.00-2399.97 -25926.1718.23 0.96-280.08-5104.600.00 1.00-2218.18 0.00112.6723 1.00-2268.89 -27243.78620.0000 1.00-2380.64 0.0000
Water 216.39 -86404.8818.99 1.00-2459.32-5313.52137.14 -58647.29117.42 -28337.61255.11 -122144.29
Total -150365.69 -150481.90
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-
-
258
D.14 Condenser (E-202)
Condenser (E-202)
E-202
Study Node 17 18
COOLING WATER
INLET OUTLET
Stream 17 18
Temperature (K) Temperature (K)374.38Temperature (K)374.38
Pressure (bar) Pressure (bar)1.00Pressure (bar)1.00
Molar flowSpecificMolar flow
rateEnthalpyEnergy Flow rateSpecific Enthalpy Energy Flow
Components (kmol/hr)Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)(kmol/hr)Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
0.000.00-665.890.000.000.00-665.890.00
0.000.000.030.000.000.000.030.00
Glycerol
0.030.00-429.61-14.330.030.00-485.13-16.19
Hydrogen
0.000.00-439.170.000.000.00-439.170.00
Propylene Glycol
3.250.03-201.16-652.913.250.03-231.69-751.99
Ethylene Glycol
1.460.01-291.29-426.581.460.01-357.39-523.38
Methanol
112.670.96-241.80-27243.79112.670.96-280.08-31556.85
Acetol
117.421.00-2268.89-28337.61117.421.00-2459.32-32848.41
Water
-28337.61-32848.41
Total
-4510.80
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
-
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
259
D.15 Reflux Drum (V-202)
18
19 20
260
D.16 Reboiler (E-203)
Reboiler (E-203)
22
Study Node 21
E-203 23
261
D.17 Pump (P-301)
Pump (P-301)
24
Study Node 23
P-301
INLET OUTLET
Stream 23 24
Gamma Temperature (K) 467.65 Temperature (K) 542.25
1.10 Pressure (bar) 1.00 Pressure (bar) 1.01
262
D.18 Heat Exchanger (E-301)
E-301
Study Node 24 25
STEAM
INLET OUTLET
Stream 24 25
542.25 558.00
Temperature (K) 1.01 1.01
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 0.19-665.86 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
22.06 0.000.03 22.06
0.79-441.13 -14686.56 0.19-665.86-14686.50
Glycerol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.030.00
Hydrogen 93.19 0.02-406.19 93.19
0.00-208.36 -41109.35 0.79-436.36-40664.49
Propylene Glycol 2.72 -1105.13 2.72 0.02-402.73-1095.70
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00-316.38 0.00
0.00-266.49 0.00 0.00-205.360.00
Methanol 0.00 -0.08 0.00 0.00-311.19-0.08
Acetol 0.00 1.00-2304.39 0.00
-56901.12 0.00 0.00-265.020.00
Water 117.97 -56901.12 117.97 1.00-2286.48-56446.77
Total -56446.77
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
454.35
-
263
D.19 Distillation Column (V-301)
26 27
E-302
Cooling water
V-302
28 29
Study Node
25 V-301
40
E-303
39
INLET OUTLET
Stream 28
25 40 26 39
558.00 461.35 558.45 461.35 558.45
Temperature (K)
1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar)
Specific Specific SpecificMolar flow Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow EnthalpyEnergy Flow rate EnthalpyEnergy Flow
Components rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
(kmol/hr) 0.19-665.86 (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) 1.00-665.86 (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) 0.0000-665.6801-1.648727.7487 1.0000-665.5219-18467.3748
22.06 0.000.03 -14686.500.00 0.00-665.88-0.185.69 0.000.03 -3791.780.0025 0.00000.02780.00000.0000 0.00000.02850.0000
Glycerol 0.00 0.000.00 0.000.030.000.00 0.000.0000
0.79-436.36 0.00-436.22 0.9716-429.6859-44964.59460.0000 0.0000-436.22010.0000
Hydrogen 93.19 -40664.4911.45 0.60-463.90-5313.740.00 0.00104.6453
0.02-402.73 0.00-387.08 0.0284-387.0909-1182.36240.0007 0.0000-402.6307-0.2757
Propylene Glycol 2.72 -1095.700.33 0.02-423.03-141.440.00 -0.053.0545
0.00-205.36 0.00-205.27 0.0000-221.35760.00000.0000 0.0000-205.26940.0000
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00-221.360.000.00 0.000.0000
0.00-311.19 0.00-311.04 0.0000-291.2883-0.08030.0000 0.0000-311.03510.0000
Methanol 0.00 -0.080.00 0.00-339.04-0.010.00 0.000.0003
0.00-265.02 0.00-264.97 0.0000-273.32780.00000.0000 0.0000-264.97400.0000
Acetol 0.00 0.000.00 0.00-273.330.000.00 0.000.0000
1.00-2286.48 1.00-2270.41 1.0000-2268.4029 -46148.686027.7494 1.0000-2285.6227 -18467.6505
Water 117.97 -56446.7711.79 0.62-2386.50-5455.375.69 -3791.84107.7025 -64616.3365
Total -65693.98
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-
-
264
D.20 Condenser (E-302)
Condenser (E-302)
E-302
COOLING WATER
INLET OUTLET
Stream 26 27
461.35 461.35
Temperature (K) 1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 0.00-665.88 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
0.00 0.000.03 0.00
0.97-429.69 -1.65 0.00-665.88-1.65
Glycerol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.030.00
Hydrogen 104.65 0.03-387.09 104.65
0.00-221.36 -44964.59 0.97-463.90-48545.14
Propylene Glycol 3.05 -1182.36 3.05 0.03-423.03-1292.13
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00-291.29 0.00
0.00-273.33 0.00 0.00-221.360.00
Methanol 0.00 -0.08 0.00 0.00-339.04-0.09
Acetol 0.00 1.00-2268.60 0.00
-46148.69 0.00 0.00-273.330.00
Water 107.70 -46148.69 107.70 1.00-2386.50-49839.00
Total -49839.00
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-3690.32
-
265
D.21 Reflux Drum (V-302)
Study Node
266
D.22 Reboiler (E-303)
Reboiler (E-303)
40
Study Node 39
E-303 41
267
D.23 Pump (P-401)
Pump (P-401)
30
Study Node 29
P-401
INLET OUTLET
Stream 29 30
Gamma Temperature (K)461.35 Temperature (K)535.39
1.10 Pressure (bar)1.00 Pressure (bar)1.01
Molar flowSpecific Molar flow
rateEnthalpyEnergy Flow rateSpecific Enthalpy Energy Flow
Components (kmol/hr)Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr) (kmol/hr)Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
0.000.00-665.88-1.47 0.000.00-665.87-1.47
Glycerol 0.000.000.030.00 0.000.000.030.00
Hydrogen 93.190.79-463.90-43231.39 93.190.97-443.17-41299.59
Propylene Glycol 2.720.02-423.03-1150.69 2.720.03-407.68-1108.95
Ethylene Glycol 0.000.00-221.360.00 0.000.00-209.610.00
Methanol 0.000.00-339.04-0.08 0.000.00-318.55-0.08
Acetol 0.000.00-273.330.00 0.000.00-267.110.00
Water 95.910.81-2386.50-44383.63 95.911.00-2311.97-42410.09
Total -44383.63 -42410.09
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr) -
Heat duty (MJ/hr) 548.21
Power requirement (kW)
268
D.24 Heat Exchanger (E-401)
E-401
Study Node 30 31
STEAM
INLET OUTLET
Stream 30 31
535.39 461.97
Temperature (K) 1.01 1.01
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 0.00-665.87 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
0.00 0.000.03 0.00
0.97-443.17 -1.47 0.00-665.88-1.47
Glycerol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.030.00
Hydrogen 93.19 0.03-407.68 93.19
0.00-209.61 -41299.59 0.97-463.74-43216.11
Propylene Glycol 2.72 -1108.95 2.72 0.03-422.90-1150.35
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00-318.55 0.00
0.00-267.11 0.00 0.00-221.270.00
Methanol 0.00 -0.08 0.00 0.00-338.89-0.08
Acetol 0.00 1.00-2311.97 0.00
-42410.09 0.00 0.00-273.280.00
Water 95.91 -42410.09 95.91 1.00-2385.93-44368.02
Total -44368.02
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-1957.93
-
269
D.25 Distillation Column (V-401)
32 33
E-402
Cooling water
V-402
34 35
Study Node
31 E-401
37
E-403
38
36
INLET OUTLET
Stream 34
31 37 32 36
461.97 461.05 470.44 461.05 470.44
Temperature (K) 1.00
Pressure (bar) 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00
Specific Specific Specific Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow Enthalpy
Components rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol) Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) 0.00-665.88 (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) 0.00-665.88 (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) 0.00-665.68 (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr) 0.00-665.67 (MJ/hr)
0.00 0.000.03 -1.470.00 0.00-665.880.000.00 0.000.03 -0.210.00 0.000.03 0.000.00 0.000.03 -1.68
Glycerol 0.00 0.97-463.74 0.000.00 0.000.030.000.00 0.01-461.49 0.000.00 1.00-463.98 0.000.00 0.01-461.49 0.00
Hydrogen 93.19 0.03-422.90 -43216.11391.86 1.00-463.98-181816.380.00 0.99-387.09 -1.24485.04 0.00-387.09 -225046.330.02 0.99-421.22 -9.84
Propylene Glycol 2.72 0.00-221.27 -1150.350.69 0.00-423.08-290.410.37 0.00-220.08 -142.300.85 0.00-221.40 -328.882.92 0.00-220.08 -1231.88
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00-338.89 0.000.00 0.00-221.400.000.00 0.00-336.79 0.000.00 0.00-291.29 0.000.00 0.00-336.79 0.00
Methanol 0.00 0.00-273.28 -0.080.00 0.00-339.11-0.350.00 0.00-272.60 0.000.00 0.00-273.35 -0.370.00 0.00-272.60 0.00
Acetol 0.00 1.00-2385.93 0.000.00 0.00-273.350.000.00 1.00-2343.90 0.000.00 1.00-2302.76 0.000.00 1.00-2377.82 0.00
Water 95.91 -44368.02392.55 1.00-2386.77-182107.150.37 -143.75485.89 -225375.592.95 -1243.39
Total -226618.91 -226618.98
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-
-
270
D.26 Condenser (E-402)
Condenser (E-402)
E-402
Study Node
32 733
COOLING WATER
INLET OUTLET
Stream 32 33
461.05 461.05
Temperature (K) 1.00 1.00
Pressure (bar) Specific
Molar flow Enthalpy Molar flow
rate Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)
Components 0.00-665.88 Energy Flow rate Specific Enthalpy Energy Flow
(kmol/hr) (MJ/hr) (kmol/hr) Mole fraction (MJ/kmol)(MJ/hr)
0.00 0.000.03 0.00
1.00-463.98 0.00 0.00-665.880.00
Glycerol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.030.00
Hydrogen 485.04 0.00-387.09 485.04
0.00-221.40 -225046.33 1.00-463.98-225046.33
Propylene Glycol 0.85 -328.88 0.85 0.00-423.08-359.46
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00-291.29 0.00
0.00-273.35 0.00 0.00-221.400.00
Methanol 0.00 -0.37 0.00 0.00-339.11-0.43
Acetol 0.00 1.00-2302.96 0.00
-225375.59 0.00 0.00-273.350.00
Water 485.89 -225375.59 485.89 1.00-2386.77-225406.23
Total -225406.23
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)
Heat duty (MJ/hr)
Power requirement (kW)
-30.64
-
271
D.27 Reflux Drum (V-402)
33
34 35
272
D.28 Reboiler (E-403)
Reboiler (E-403)
37
Study Node 36
E-403 38
273
D.29 Overall Energy Balance Followed Stream Number
Specific Entalphy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
(MJ/kmol)
Glycerol
Hydrogen -665.90 -665.90 -665.89 -665.88 -665.90 -665.87 -665.88 -665.88 -665.85 -665.88 -665.85 -665.85 -665.85 -665.85 -665.87 -665.88
Propylene Glycol 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Ethylene Glycol -500.04 -500.04 -489.96 -460.80 -494.94 -453.35 -460.80 -460.80 -420.15 -460.80 -420.15 -420.15 -420.15 -420.15 -443.99 -467.77
Methanol -450.75 -450.75 -442.90 -420.70 -446.77 -415.17 -420.70 -420.70 -391.13 -420.70 -391.13 -391.13 -391.13 -391.13 -408.28 -425.93
Acetol -238.19 -238.19 -233.84 -219.71 -236.01 -215.60 -219.71 -201.16 -194.44 -219.71 -194.44 -194.44 -194.44 -194.44 -210.11 -223.36
Water -369.30 -369.30 -361.29 -336.15 -365.26 -328.97 -336.15 -336.15 -292.35 -336.15 -292.35 -292.35 -292.35 -292.35 -319.42 -342.56
TOTAL -285.46 -285.46 -281.74 -272.39 -283.53 -270.17 -272.39 -241.80 -259.64 -272.39 -259.64 -259.64 -259.64 -259.64 -267.36 -274.51
-2509.61 -2509.61 -2475.60 -2375.61 -2492.38 -2349.10 -2375.61 -2326.46 -2223.53 -2375.61 -2223.53 -2223.53 -2223.53 -2223.53 -2315.00 -2399.97
Energy Flow
(MJ/hr) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Glycerol
Hydrogen -79390.94 0.00 -79390.23 -79388.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 -14686.81 0.00 -14686.811.03 -14686.31 0.00 0.00 -14686.60 -14686.90
Propylene Glycol 0.00 10.94 0.000.00 10.94 16.72 16.61 13.94 5.78 13.9414.46 0.00 14.46 8.67 0.00 0.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -42955.37 0.00 -42955.37 7537.04 -39165.56 0.00 0.00 -41388.43 -43604.70
Methanol 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1144.60 0.00 -1144.60164.24 -1064.14 0.00 0.00 -1110.80 -1158.83
Acetol 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -547.29 0.00 -597.76120.13 -529.02 0.00 0.00 -571.64 -607.69
Water 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -412.73 0.00 -412.7395.41 -358.95 0.00 0.00 -392.18 -420.59
TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -22836.86 0.00 -25726.53 2474.94 -24521.67 0.00 0.00 -25251.30 -25926.17
-79390.94 10.94 -79390.23 -79388.18 10.94 16.72 16.61 -82569.73 5.78 -85509.87 10407.25 -80325.66 14.46 8.67 -83400.95 -86404.88
274
Table 76 Energy Balance of Overall Stream Balances (Stream 17-Stream 41)
Specific Entalphy 20 23 24 25 29 30 31 35 38 41
(MJ/kmol)
Glycerol
Hydrogen -665.89 -14686.83 -14686.56 -14686.50 -665.88 -665.87 -665.88 -665.88 -665.88 -665.86
Propylene Glycol 0.03 0.000.000.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Ethylene Glycol -485.13 -43075.74 -41109.35 -40664.49 -463.90 -443.17 -463.74 -463.98 -461.49 -436.22
Methanol -439.17 -1147.51 -1105.13 -1095.70 -423.03 -407.68 -422.90 -423.08 -421.22 -402.63
Acetol -231.69 0.000.000.00 -221.36 -209.61 -221.27 -221.40 -220.08 -205.27
Water -357.39 -0.08-0.08-0.08 -339.04 -318.55 -338.89 -339.11 -336.79 -311.04
TOTAL -280.08 0.000.000.00 -273.33 -267.11 -273.28 -273.35 -272.60 -264.97
-2459.32 -58910.17 -56901.12 -56446.77 -2386.50 -2311.97 -2385.93 -2386.77 -2378.03 -2285.96
Energy Flow
(MJ/hr) 20232425293031353841
Glycerol 0.00 -14686.83 -14686.56 -14686.50-1.47-1.47-1.470.00-1.47 -14685.03
Hydrogen 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Propylene Glycol -13.57 -43075.74 -41109.35 -40664.49 -43231.39 -41299.59 -43216.11 -43229.95-8.600.00
Ethylene Glycol 0.00 -1147.51 -1105.13 -1095.70 -1150.69 -1108.95 -1150.35-69.05 -1077.03-0.22
Methanol -630.350.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Acetol -438.72-0.08-0.08-0.08-0.08-0.08-0.08-0.080.000.00
Water -26452.250.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
TOTAL -27534.89 -58910.17 -56901.12 -56446.77 -44383.63 -42410.09 -44368.02 -43299.08 -1087.10 -14685.25
275
D.30 Heat Capacity Constants and Heat of Formation for Components
Cp Constants (J/kmol.K) Hf
Components C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 (MJ/kmol)
Glycerol (C3H8O3)
[liquid] 8.4E+00 4.4E-01 -3.2E-04 9.4E-08 0.0E+00 -6.7E+02
Propylene Glycol
(C3H8O2) [liquid] 5.8E+04 4.5E+02 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 -5.0E+02
Propylene Glycol
(C3H8O2) [gas] 2.0E+05 8.1E+04 1.9E+03 -2.4E+05 2.8E+02 -4.3E+02
Ethylene Glycol
(C2H6O2) [liquid] 3.6E+04 4.4E+02 -1.8E-01 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 -4.5E+02
Ethylene Glycol
(C2H6O2) [gas] 8.2E+03 1.3E+04 1.7E+03 9.3E+04 -7.5E+02 -3.9E+02
Methanol (CH3OH)
[liquid] 1.1E+05 -3.6E+02 9.4E-01 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 -2.4E+02
Methanol (CH3OH)
[gas] 3.9E+04 8.8E+04 1.9E+03 5.4E+04 9.0E+02 -2.0E+02
Acetol (C3H6O2)
[liquid] 2.1E+05 -7.0E+02 1.7E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 -3.7E+02
276
Appendix E: Utilities
E.1Utility Stream Balance
Table 77 Amount of heating fluid for Heat Exchanger (E-101)
UTILITY
INLET OUTLET
E-101 Steam_U 1 Stream_U 2
Heat Exchanger Temperature (K)473.00
Temperature (K)523.00 Pressure (bar)1.00
Pressure (bar)1.00 Mass flowSpecific
Mass flowSpecific rateMassEnthalpyEnergy Flow
rateMassEnthalpyEnergy Flow (ton/hr)fraction(MJ/ton)(MJ/hr)
(ton/hr)fraction(MJ/ton)(MJ/hr)Components 605.950.201.002870.72585.45
Superheated Steam0.201.002971.22 605.950.201.002870.72585.45
Total0.201.002971.22 585.45
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)605.95 -20.50
Heat duty (MJ/hr) -
Power requirement (kW)
277
Table 80 Amount of heating fluid for Heat Exchanger (E-104)
UTILITY
INLET OUTLET
E-104 Steam_U 7 Stream_U 8
Heat Exchanger Temperature (K)473.00
Temperature (K)523.00 Pressure (bar)1.00
Pressure (bar)1.00 Mass flowSpecific
Mass flowSpecific rateMassEnthalpyEnergy Flow
rateMassEnthalpyEnergy Flow (ton/hr)fraction(MJ/ton)(MJ/hr)
(ton/hr)fraction(MJ/ton)(MJ/hr)Components 153829.9351.771.002870.72 148626.71
Superheated Steam51.771.002971.22 153829.9351.771.002870.72 148626.71
Total51.771.002971.22 148626.71
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)153829.93 -5203.22
Heat duty (MJ/hr) -
Power requirement (kW)
278
Table 83 Amount of heating fluid for Reboiler (E-203)
UTILITY
INLETOUTLET
E-203Steam_U 13Stream_U 14
ReboilerTemperature (K)523.00Temperature (K)473.00
Pressure (bar)1.00Pressure (bar)1.00
Mass flowSpecificSpecific
rateMassEnthalpyEnergy Flow Mass flow rateMassEnthalpyEnergy Flow
(ton/hr)fraction(MJ/ton)(MJ/hr)(ton/hr)fraction(MJ/ton)(MJ/hr)Components
Superheated Steam44.491.002971.22 132188.9844.491.002870.72 127717.76
Total44.491.002971.22 132188.9844.491.002870.72 127717.76
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)132188.98127717.76
Heat duty (MJ/hr)-4471.22
Power requirement (kW)-
279
Table 86 Amount of heating fluid for Reboiler (E-303)
UTILITY
INLETOUTLET
E-303Steam_U 19Stream_U 20
ReboilerTemperature (K)323.00Temperature (K)303.00
Pressure (bar)1.00Pressure (bar)1.00
Molar flowSpecificSpecific
rateMoleEnthalpyEnergy Flow Molar flow rateMoleEnthalpyEnergy Flow
(kmol/hr)fraction(MJ/kmol) (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr)fraction(MJ/kmol) (MJ/hr)Components
Water0.001.001.880.000.001.000.380.00
Total0.001.001.880.000.001.000.380.00
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)0.000.00
Heat duty (MJ/hr)-0.002
Power requirement (kW)-
280
Table 89 Amount of heating fluid for Reboiler (E-403)
UTILITY
INLETOUTLET
Steam_U 25Stream_U 26E-403
ReboilerTemperature (K)323.00Temperature (K)303.00
Pressure (bar)1.00Pressure (bar)1.00
Molar flowSpecificSpecific
rateMoleEnthalpyEnergy Flow Molar flow rate MoleEnthalpyEnergy Flow
(kmol/hr)fraction(MJ/kmol) (MJ/hr)(kmol/hr)fraction(MJ/kmol) (MJ/hr)Components
Water8.341.001.8815.698.341.000.383.14
Total8.341.001.8815.698.341.000.383.14
Total Energy Flow (MJ/hr)15.693.14
Heat duty (MJ/hr)-12.55
Power requirement (kW)-
281
Appendix F: Mass Transfer Equipment Design
Component Distribution
Step 1: Identification of Light Key (LK) and Heavy Key (HK) Component
Components A B C
Dew point
Bubble point
282
Dew point 101.38˚C
283
Relative volatilities, α
= 3.985151065
Component αi
284
Feed condition saturated liquid
q 1.00
The value is obtained such that the Underwood equation becomes equals to 1-q,
which in
this case is, equals to 0. Also the value compromises>θ >.
Therefore, for the obtainedvalue, minimum reflux ratio, Rmin is calculated according to
following equation, the
R = 1.5(0.07) = 0.10
285
Glycol
Only for Glycerol and Acetol, μ liq (cP) is taken from ASPEN at Feed Temperature = 394
K.
Component μ liq (cP) Mole frac 𝜇,Favg
1.65187368
= 32.85524412%
Step 7: Determination of actual number of theoretical stages
X = 0.644293508
Therefore,29.57827466
N = 89 trays
286
Number of stages = 89 trays
0.334108553
Nactual = NR + NS
Solving simultaneously gives, NR =
22.53922269
and NS = 67.46077731
Column Sizing
The distillation column is sized based on the top condition and the bottom condition,
where
the dimensions of distillation column are finalized based on the larger diameter
calculated
either at the top or bottom condition. For column sizing, flow rate of and density at
top and
bottom condition. The data are presented below:
Density
Parameters top bottom
0.614388843 2.029686976
(kg/m3)
Note : Average density and average surface tension of mixture is calculated for
top and
bottom condition based on equations and constants obtained from Perry’s
Handbook.
Following forula is used to calculate FLV.
287
Assuming column diameter is less than 1 m, tray spacing of 0.46 m is typically
chosen.
0 .2
L V 0 .5
Vnf C sb
To calculate Csb use this formula, 20
V
= 0.328990967 = 1.42668792
An
AC
1 0.12
Top Condition Bottom Condition
=0.373853372 = 1.621236273
288
Step 5: Determination of column diameter, Dc
4 AC 0 .5
DC
Top Condition
0.689931373 m Bottom Condition
Dc 1.436740714 m
Since limiting diameter occurs at bottom, the chosen diameter for the column is,
Dc =
1.436740714 m.
Rule of thumb:
289
Step 2: Provisional plate design
Column diameter,
Column area,
Downcomer area, Ad AC An
= 0.194548353 m2
Net area,
Active area,
Assume all holes take 10% of active area,
Hole area,
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.31,
When
Min 5.5817
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.30
At minimum liquid flow rate,55.5817
290
uh 14.61482419
Percentage Flooding = = 80 %
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.29
When FLV = 0.013728875
Fractional Entrainment, 𝜑 = 0.085
Since 𝜑 < 0.1, the efficiency of plate is not much affected, the design is
satisfactory
291
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.32
When
= 0.76, θc = 99°
Mechanical Design
Step 1: Design Pressure
Safety margin of 10% is applied to the operating pressure of the column, which is
5 bar.
292
Step 4: Welded joint efficiency
A double welded butt type of welding is used to balance the tradeoff between higher
cost and
higher strength of weld joint. The welded joint factor, J is 0.85 using spot as the degree
of
radiography.
Step 5: Minimum Column Thickness
Internal diameter of column, Di = 1.43674014 m = 1436.74 mm
Wall thickness is calculated based on Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design.
0.778516548 mm
Taking corrosion allowance of 2 mm.
So, fabrication thickness of column wall = 0.778516548 + 2 = 2.778516548 mm
For corrosion allowance of 2 mm from Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical
Engineering
Design,
Since the column diameter is 1.4367 m, thus the suggested minimum thickness
should be
used which is 7 mm because the calculated wall thickness is smaller.
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) for this wall thickness is given
by:
293
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of
column is
acceptable.
Step 6: Column Head Design
Due to low design pressure of the system, the type of head chosen is torispherical
head. For
torispherical head, the head thickness is designed as below:
Crown radius, Rc=Di = 1.4367 m
Knuckle radius, Rk=0.06Rc = 0.08622
Cs = 0.811237244t = e = 0.536687681
Taking corrosion allowance of 2 mm.
So, fabrication thickness of column wall = 0.536687681+ 2 = 2.536687681
mm
For corrosion allowance of 2 mm from Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical
Engineering
Design,
Since the column diameter is 1.4367 m, thus the suggested minimum thickness
should be
used which is 7 mm because the calculated wall thickness is smaller.
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) for this wall thickness is given
by:
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of column is
acceptable
Step 7: Insulation Design
Rock wool is chosen as the insulation material as it can be used up to the temperature
of 659
oC. Rock wool has the density of 130 kg/m 3 and insulation thickness of 75 mm.
= 123.802 kN
Weight of Trays
Weight of single tray = Plate area x Plate thickness x Stainless steel density
xg
= 0.633870178 kN
Weight of Insulation
Volume of Insulation =14.28993743 m3
Weight of Insulation =g
= 130 x 14.28993743 x 9.81
= 18223.9572 N = 18.2239572 kN
Total weight of insulation = 2 x 18.2239572 kN
= 36.4479144 kN
Wind Loading
Typically, wind pressure = 1280 N/m2 for preliminary design.
1.604740714
1829590.152
295
Bending stress,
85.29982594
Total longitudinal stress,
This does not exceed the design stress for the material construction of this column
(119.5
N/mm2) hence the design is acceptable.
This angle is between 80o and 90o hence the skirt base angle is
satisfactory.
The maximum dead weight load on the skirt will occur when the vessel is full of
water.
671361.5712 = 671.3615712 kN
2117.534349
80.35012786
296
10.18996232
The skirt thickness should be such that under the worst combination of wind and dead-
weight
loading, 2 design criteria must be satisfied. Choosing the skirt material to be stainless
steel,
maximum allowable design stress at 20 oC is 145 N/mm2. The Young modulus of
stainless
2
101.5419676
steel type 316 is 197.5 kN/mm
203.0589432
From Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design Figure 13.26, the bolt
type
selected is M 48 E as it is the closest standard size bolt larger than 38 mm. Its root
area is
1470 mm2.
Total compressive load on base ring, Fb
297
Actual base ring width = Lr + ts + 50 = 76 + 7 + 50 = 133 mm
Actual bearing pressure on concrete foundation pad, = 8.159263197
N/mm2
Allowable design stress in ring material, fr = 140 N/mm2 (From Coulson and
Richardson’s
Chemical Engineering Design)
The Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the optimum pipe (and
nozzle)
diameter:
298
F.2 Distillation Column, V-301
Component Distribution
Step 1: Identification of Light Key (LK) and Heavy Key (HK) Component
Components A B C
Dew point
Bubble point
299
Pressure (mmHg) 760.00
1/P=∑yi/Psat 1.00
∑yi/Ki 1.00
300
Relative volatilities, α
= 14.09848722
Component αi
301
Feed condition saturated liquid
q 1.00
The value is obtained such that the Underwood equation becomes equals to 1-q,
which in
this case is, equals to 0. Also the value compromises>θ >.
Therefore, for the obtainedvalue, minimum reflux ratio, Rmin is calculated according to
following equation, the
R = 1.5(0.05) = 0.07
Only for Glycerol, μ liq (cP) is taken from ASPEN at Feed Temperature = 467.66
K.
302
Component μ liq (cP) Mole frac 𝜇,Favg
0.735953967
= 29.64467883%
X = 0.66352063
Therefore,19.8295
N = 66 trays
0.494148117
Nactual = NR + NS
303
Solving simultaneously gives, NR =
22.15839478
and NS = 44.84160522
Column Sizing
The distillation column is sized based on the top condition and the bottom condition,
where
the dimensions of distillation column are finalized based on the larger diameter
calculated
either at the top or bottom condition. For column sizing, flow rate of and density at
top and
bottom condition. The data are presented below:
Density
Parameters top bottom
(kg/m3) 1.973397829 1.983644088
887.2195531 1055.849857
(kg/m3)
Mass Flow Rate
(kg/s) 513.1315895 9804.534547
7773.46 11835.61
(kg/s)
Other Calculated Parameters
0.077804548 0.03789347
ave (N/m)
Liquid-Vapor Flow 0.003113196 0.035905998
factor,
Note : Average density and average surface tension of mixture is calculated for
top and
bottom condition based on equations and constants obtained from Perry’s
Handbook.
Following forula is used to calculate FLV.
= 0.949751138 = 1.590394369
An
AC
1 0.12
Top Condition Bottom Condition
= 1.079262656 = 1.807266328
Since limiting diameter occurs at bottom, the chosen diameter for the column is,
Dc =
1.516932728 m.
Rule of thumb:
Column diameter,
Column area,
Downcomer area, Ad AC An
306
= 0.216871959 m2
Net area,
Active area,
Assume all holes take 10% of active area,
Hole area,
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.31,
When
Min 12.5419
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.30
At minimum liquid flow rate,62.5419
uh 12.06670721
Percentage Flooding = = 80 %
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.29
When FLV = 0.035905998
Fractional Entrainment, 𝜑 = 0.075
Since 𝜑 < 0.1, the efficiency of plate is not much affected, the design is
satisfactory.
308
Mean length, unperforated edge strips= (1.5169 − = 2.074096184 m
0.05) ×
Area of unperforated edge strips = 0.103704809
m2
Mean length of calming zone = 1.2 m
Area of calming zone = 0.120286887 m2
Total area for perforations, Ap = 1.149530713 m2
= 0.11948549
Mechanical Design
309
Step 4: Welded joint efficiency
A double welded butt type of welding is used to balance the tradeoff between higher
cost and
higher strength of weld joint. The welded joint factor, J is 0.85 using spot as the degree
of
radiography.
Step 5: Minimum Column Thickness
Internal diameter of column, Di =m = 1516.93278 mm
Wall thickness is calculated based on Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design.
0.889641201mm
Taking corrosion allowance of 2 mm.
So, fabrication thickness of column wall = 0.889641201 + 2 = 2.889641201 mm
For corrosion allowance of 2 mm from Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical
Engineering
Design
Since the column diameter is 1.5169 m, thus the suggested minimum thickness
should be
used which is 7 mm because the calculated wall thickness is smaller.
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) for this wall thickness is given
by:
310
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of
column is
acceptable.
Cs = 0.81123t = e = 0.613280767
Taking corrosion allowance of 2 mm.
So, fabrication thickness of column wall = 0.613280767+ 2 = 2.613280767
mm
For corrosion allowance of 2 mm from Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical
Engineering
Design,
Since the column diameter is 1.5169 m, thus the suggested minimum thickness
should be
used which is 7 mm because the calculated wall thickness is smaller.
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) for this wall thickness is given
by:
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of
column is
acceptable.
311
Step 8: Weight of Vessel
The total weight of the vessel consists of the column weight, tray weight and weight of
insulation. Each weight is calculated separately and totalled up to get the total weight
of
vessel which is required for stress analysis of the column. The weight of column is
calculated
based on formula in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design:
Weight of Column
Take Cv = 1.15 as a factor to account for the weight of nozzle, manway, internal
support
1.523932728
= 66.955 kN
Weight of Trays
Weight of single tray = Plate area x Plate thickness x Stainless steel density
xg
= 0.70660412 kN
Weight of Insulation
Volume of Insulation =7.50605 m3
Weight of Insulation =g
= 130 x 7.50605 x 9.81
= 9572.470937 N = 9.5725 kN
Total weight of insulation = 2 x 9.5725 kN
= 19.1449 kN
Wind Loading
Typically, wind pressure = 1280 N/m2 for preliminary design.
1.680932728 m
2151.593891
474336.0904
312
Dead weight stress, 2.5899
88.3501
o o
This angle is between 80 and 90 hence the skirt base angle is
satisfactory.
The maximum dead weight load on the skirt will occur when the vessel is full of
water.
= 372.3280628 kN
313
629.9255904
21.18329068
5.321313856
The skirt thickness should be such that under the worst combination of wind and dead-
weight
loading, 2 design criteria must be satisfied. Choosing the skirt material to be stainless
steel,
maximum allowable design stress at 20 oC is 145 N/mm2. The Young modulus of
stainless
steel type 316 is 197.5 kN/mm2
1 93.80163342
191.0983079
From Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design Figure 13.26, the bolt
type
selected is M 24 F .
Total compressive load on base ring, Fb
314
From Figure 13.26 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design,
distance
from skirt edge to ring edge, Lr = 76 mm
Actual base ring width = Lr + ts + 50 = 76 + 7 + 50 = 133 mm
Actual bearing pressure on concrete foundation pad, = 2.2089 N/mm 2
Allowable design stress in ring material, fr = 140 N/mm2 (From Coulson and
Richardson’s
Chemical Engineering Design)
The Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the optimum pipe (and
nozzle)
diameter:
Step 1: Identification of Light Key (LK) and Heavy Key (HK) Component
315
Step 2: Determination of partial vapor pressure and relative volatilities
Components A B C
Dew point
Bubble point
316
Pressure (mmHg) 760.00
P=∑xi*Psat 1.00
∑xiKi 1.00
Relative volatilities, α
317
= 1.337274317
Component αi
q 1.00
The value is obtained such that the Underwood equation becomes equals to 1-q,
which in
this case is, equals to 0. Also the value compromises>θ >.
Therefore, for the obtainedvalue, minimum reflux ratio, Rmin is calculated according to
following equation, the
318
By rule of thumb, R = 1.5 Rmin
R = 1.5(2.81) = 4.22
0.585233988
= 53.16498248 %
X = 0.3929
Therefore, 63.6071
319
Actual number of theoretical stages,
Nact
119.64
Number of trays by minus reboiler, N
N = 119 trays
1.774330824
Nactual = NR + NS
Solving simultaneously gives, NR =
76.74632638
and NS = 43.25367362
Column Sizing
The distillation column is sized based on the top condition and the bottom condition,
where
the dimensions of distillation column are finalized based on the larger diameter
calculated
either at the top or bottom condition. For column sizing, flow rate of and density at
top and
bottom condition. The data are presented below:
320
Density
Parameters top bottom
(kg/m3) 1.98429901 1.588098929
885.0554872 966.4397538
(kg/m3)
Mass Flow Rate
(kg/s) 29977.06581 37237.38974
37077.07 37397.71
(kg/s)
Other Calculated Parameters
0.041843037 0.03942631
ave (N/m)
Liquid-Vapor Flow 0.038282657 0.040363197
factor,
Note : Average density and average surface tension of mixture is calculated for
top and
bottom condition based on equations and constants obtained from Perry’s
Handbook.
Following forula is used to calculate FLV.
= 3.772540467 = 4.129615007
An
AC
1 0.12
Top Condition Bottom Condition
= 4.2870 = 4.6927
4 AC 0 .5
DC
Top Condition
2.3363 m Bottom Condition
Dc 2.4444 m
Since limiting diameter occurs at bottom, the chosen diameter for the column is, D c =
2.4444
m.
Rule of thumb:
322
Where: Hs: tray spacing
∆H: Additional height required for column
operation
Column diameter,
Column area,
Downcomer area, Ad AC An
= 0.5631 m2
Net area,
Active area,
Assume all holes take 10% of active area,
Hole area,
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.31,
When
323
Minimum liquid flow rate at 70% turndown = 0.70 7.2406
(10.3437
Max 24.1032
Min 36.7619
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.30
At minimum liquid flow rate,86.7619
uh 18.34106343
Percentage Flooding = = 80 %
From Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Figure
11.29
When FLV = 0.0404
Fractional Entrainment, 𝜑 = 0.065
Since 𝜑 < 0.1, the efficiency of plate is not much affected, the design is
satisfactory.
Mechanical Design
Step 1: Design Pressure
Safety margin of 10% is applied to the operating pressure of the column, which is
5 bar.
325
Step 2: Design temperature
Safety margin of 10 C is applied to the highest temperature of the column,
which is
208.00 C.
Design temperature = 197.4698 + 10 = 208 ℃
1.32795 mm
Taking corrosion allowance of 2 mm.
So, fabrication thickness of column wall = 1.32795 + 2 = 3.32795
mm
326
For corrosion allowance of 2 mm from Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical
Engineering
Design
Since the column diameter is 2.4444 m, thus the suggested minimum thickness
should be
used which is 9 mm because the calculated wall thickness is smaller.
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) for this wall thickness is given
by:
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of
column is
acceptable.
Cs = 0.8112t = e = 0.9155
Taking corrosion allowance of 2 mm.
So, fabrication thickness of column wall = 0.9155+ 2 = 2.9155
mm
For corrosion allowance of 2 mm from Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical
Engineering
Design,
327
Since the column diameter is 2.4444 m, thus the suggested minimum thickness
should be
used which is 9 mm because the calculated wall thickness is smaller.
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) for this wall thickness is given
by:
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of
column is
acceptable.
= 362.1708 kN
Weight of Trays
Weight of single tray = Plate area x Plate thickness x Stainless steel density
xg
= 1.8348 kN
328
= 41208.6256 N = 41.2086 kN
Total weight of insulation = 2 x 41.2086 kN
= 82.4173 kN
Wind Loading
Typically, wind pressure = 1280 N/m2 for preliminary
design.
2.6124 m
3343.8462
5261330.294
Since critical buckling stress is smaller than maximum allowable design stress,
maximum
compressive stress (90.2186 N/mm2) less than critical buckling stress (105.2470
N/mm2).
Hence, the design is satisfactory.
89.4905
This angle is between 80o and 90o hence the skirt base angle is
satisfactory.
The maximum dead weight load on the skirt will occur when the vessel is full of
water.
= 2582.8085 kN
5878.7060
91.6346
25.1623
The skirt thickness should be such that under the worst combination of wind and dead-
weight
loading, 2 design criteria must be satisfied. Choosing the skirt material to be stainless
steel,
o2
maximum allowable design stress at 20 C is 145 N/mm . The Young modulus of
stainless
101.3162
steel type 316 is 197.5 kN/mm2
129.9951
330
Since both design criteria are satisfied, the skirt thickness is
acceptable.
Skirt thickness = 13 mm
Step 11: Base ring and anchor bolt design
Take pitch circle diameter,
From Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design Figure 13.26, the bolt
type
selected is M 64 F .
Total compressive load on base ring, Fb
331
outlet
Boilup 23.12 875.13 4.23 0.17 0.2 40S
inlet 1
The Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the optimum pipe (and
nozzle)
diameter:
The calculations for heat exchanger, E-101 is shown below. The rest of the heat
exchangers
are designed using the same method of calculations.
Step 1: Specification
Pressure 40 1 bar
332
Step 3: Mean temperature difference
S= 0.707
Tube side
333
Taking number of passes, Np = 1,
From Table 12.4 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, for 1
tube
passes,
K1 = 0.037
n1 = 2.675
= 0.165 m
According to TEMA Standard, the maximum shell inside diameter is 1.52 m. Thus,
0.165 m
is acceptable.
Tube length to bundle diameter
ratio,
Tube side
334
Heat transfer factor, jh = 0.004
Shell side
From Figure 12.29 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, at buffer
cut
percent = 25% reasonable heat transfer coefficient without too large a pressure drop,
heat
transfer factor, jh = 0.009
335
Step 8: Pressure drop
Tube side
From Figure 12.24 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design,
Friction factor, jf = 0.006
Shell side
From Figure 12.30 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design,
Friction factor, jf = 0.0055,
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Shell and tube must be designed to withstand the maximum pressure to which it is
likely to
be subjected in operation.
336
The strength of metals decreases with increasing temperature, so the maximum
allowable
stress will depend on the material temperature.
Stainless steel 316 is chosen as the material of construction for this heat exchanger
because
the system contains methanol and steam which has tendency to corrode the heat
exchanger.
Stainless steel 316 can provide corrosion resistance for this exchanger where this kind
of
metal has low corrosion rate per year.
From Table 13.2 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, Stainless
steel
type 316 for tube side (at 422.71K) and shell side (at 508K) has design stress of
517.11
N/mm2 and 206.844 N/mm2 respectively, which is much higher than the design
pressure.
Hence, it is a suitable material of construction for this exchanger.
Step 4: Welded joint efficiency
A double welded butt type of welding is used for this exchanger to balance the
tradeoff
between higher cost and higher strength of weld joint. The welded joint efficiency, J of
this
weld joint is 0.85.
= 0.11 mm
337
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of shell is
acceptable.
The total weight of the vessel consists of the exchanger shell weight, exchanger tubes
weight
and weight of insulation. Each weight is calculated separately and totalled up to get the
total
weight of exchanger which is required for support design. Since both the tubes and
shell are
in cylindrical shape and made of stainless steel, the weight is calculated based on
formula in
Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design:
Weight of Tubes
Take Cv = 1.15 as a factor to account for the weight of nozzle, manway, internal
support
Length of the tube Hv = 1.83
Weight of Shell
Take Cv = 1.15 as a factor to account for the weight of nozzle, manway, internal
support
Weight of Insulation
Thicker insulation such as Calsium silicate is chosen as the material of insulation with
density
of 200 kg/m3 because can lower the surface temperature because the equivalent heat
loss is
spread over a larger surface.
1.97 N
Support Design
V (m) 0.48
Y (m) 0.15
C (m) 0.55
E (m) 0.24
J (m) 0.19
G (m) 0.095
t2 (mm) 6
t1 (mm) 5
Tube Inlet
339
Minimum Nozzle Cross Sectional Area, A = m2
Tube Outlet
Shell Inlet
Shell Outlet
340
G.2 Condenser, E-103
The calculations for condenser, E-103 is shown below. The rest of the
condensers are
designed using the same method of calculations.
Design Procedure
Step 1: Specification
From energy balance calculation,
341
= 1.3887 kg/s
=
= 0.8459 kg/s
The value of Uo is assumed based on Figure 12.1. To start with, the overall coefficient
(U) is
taken to be 700 W/m2. K.
Table 12.1: Typical overall coefficients
342
Figure 12.1 Overall coefficients
343
R= = =0
S= = = 0.143
FT = 1.000
=
=
= 162.179 K
Ao =
Ao =
Ao = 67.220 m2
*As first estimation, the heat transfer area needed lied in the normal area of a shell
and tube
exchanger, which are 3-1000m2, thus, a shell and tube exchanger is selected.
Step 6: Layout and Tube Size
= 0.291 m2
344
Therefore,
Number of passes, Np = 8
with that,
Area per pass = Total number of tubes per passes x Inner Cross-sectional Area of
Tube, Ai
= 30 x 0.0011 m2
= 0.0340 m2
Hence,
345
K1 = 0.037
n1 = 2.675
Bundle diameter, Db = do
Where,
Nt = number of tubes
Db = 0.038 = 1.016 m
Reynolds number, Re =
346
=
= 2107.469943
Prandtl number, Pr =
= 5.356
= = = 64
Nu = jh Re Pr 0.33 ( 0.14
Neglect ( ,
2
hi = 4766.502 W/m .K
347
Step 10: Shell-side Heat Transfer Coefficient
Based on Figure 12.29 (Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering), a 15% baffle
cut is
chosen.
Nu = = jh Re Pr 0.33 = (0.0028)(2107.469943)(5.3560.33) =
136.070
348
Outside Fluid Film Coefficient, hs = = = 796.946
Where
Uo = 529.038 W/m2. K
x 100% = = 24.423%
Tube side
349
jf = 0.0071
* 2.5 is the recommended value for the velocity heads per pass. Neglecting the
viscosity
correction term
P = 0.000064 bar
Shell side
Re = 64184.32667,
The pressure drop in the shell side is predicted using Kern‟s
method.
Again, neglecting the viscosity correction
term;
From Figure 12.24,
jf = 0.050
P = 0.00032 bar
350
This result is well within specification as the allowable pressure drop for this stream
is 0.8
bar.
The Harker equation (1978), modified for SI units, for the optimum pipe (and
nozzle)
diameter is:
Where
351
ASPEN
Plus
Simulation
result for E-
202
352
G.3 Reboiler, E-203
The calculations for reboiler, E-203 is shown below. The rest of the reboilers are
designed
using the same method of calculations.
Design Basis
TUBE SHELL
In Out In Out(22) Out(23)
353
Molar Flow Rate (kmol/hr) 2396.99 2396.99 279.35 161.39 117.97
Mass Flow Rate (ton/hr) 44.49 44.49 21.51 12.22 9.29
Design Parameters
Design Criteria
Design Method
The heat exchanger design is based on Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical
Engineering
Design. For the properties of the components in stream, it is determined from
ASPEN
Database.
Heat Exchanger Design
Step 1: Specification
354
Pressure 1.00 1.00 bar
Molecular weight 77.41 18.02 kg/kmol
909.9176 847.79
Density 2.46 0.45 kg/m3
0.0000547 0.000123
0.000011374 0.0000169
Viscosity 0.201 0.65 kg/m.s
0.029 0.04
Thermal 263.6684 95.41
Conductivity, k 143.3124 35.25 W/m.K
R = 25
S = 0.0349
Ft = 0.9626
355
Shell side
Using square pitch
From Table 12.4 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, for 8
tube
passes, K1= 0.0365, n1= 2.675,
Since the mixture consists of different components with wide range of boiling
points, an
empirical correction factor is needed as the nucleate boiling coefficient is
overestimated.
Where Tbo and Tbi are the temperatures of the vapor leaving the reboiler and liquid
entering
the reboiler in K.
Tube side
Assume condensing coefficient of steam, hc = 629.8023 W/m2.
K
356
Step 7: Overall heat transfer coefficient
From table 12.2 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design,
By taking organic solution as the fluid in shell and steam condensate as the fluid in
tube,
Shell side fouling factor, hod = 5000W/m2. K
Tube side fouling factor, hid = 5000W/m2. K
From table 12.6, Thermal conductivity of stainless steel, kw = 14W/m. K
357
From Figure 12.24 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design,
Friction factor, jf = 0.019
Mechanical Design
358
Since the vessel diameter is less than 1m, thus the suggested minimum thickness
should be
used is 7mm as the calculated wall thickness is smaller.
The maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) for this wall thickness is given
by:
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of shell is
acceptable.
Step 6: Exchanger Head Design
The type of head chosen is torispherical head. Based on Coulson and Richardson’s
Chemical
Engineering Design, it is proven ot be the most economical closure to use besides as
well as
its ability to withstand high pressure.
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure, the thickness of head is
acceptable.
Step 7: Weight of Exchanger
The total weight of the vessel consists of the exchanger shell weight, exchanger tubes
weight
and weight of insulation. Each weight is calculated separately and totalled up to get the
total
weight of exchanger which is required for support design. Since both the tubes and
shell are
in cylindrical shape and made of stainless steel, the weight is calculated based on
formula in
Weight of Shell
Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design:
Take Cv = 1.15 as a factor to account for the weight of nozzle, manway, internal
support
359
= 0.0276 kN
Weight of Insulation
Mineral wool is chosen as the material of insulation with thickness of 75mm and
density of
130kg/m3.
C (m) 1.77
E (m) 0.8
J (m) 0.45
G (m) 0.14
t2 (mm) 12
t1 (mm) 10
360
Shell outlet (V) 467.65 1.00 12216.29 1.9792 - 5.5937
Shell Outlet
W = Mass Flow Rate = 12216.2920 kg/hr
=m3
The Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the optimum pipe (and
nozzle)
diameter:
Take the Schedule 40S pipe, the number of shell inlet nozzles required is one with the
pipe
size of 0.5 in. Same procedures are repeated for the shell outlet 1, shell outlet 2, tube
inlet and
tube outlet nozzle calculations.
361
For shell outlet (V)
W 12216.2920 kg/hr
Density 1.9792 kg/m3
Speed of sound at 465.65 K 432.57 m/s
Volumetric flowrate 1.7145 m3/s
Pressure: 40 bar
362
Design Equation:
Nomenclature
F = molar flow rate, mol.s-1
bj = adsorption rate constant for species j, m3.mol-1
bjo = preexponential factor of adsorption rate constant for species j,
m3.mol-1
c= molar concentration, mol.m-3
Ei = activation energy of the i-th reaction, mol.g-1.s-1
ki = rate constant of the i-th reation, mol-1.g-1.s-1
kio = preexponential factor of rate constant of the i-th reaction, mol-1.g-
1.s-1
W = mass of catalyst, g
P = pressure, MPa
Qj = adsorption activation energy of species j, kJ.mol-1
Rg = universal gas constant, kJ.mol-1.K-1
ri = rate of the ith reaction, mol.g-1.s-1
T = temperature, K
for subscripts
G = Glycerol
P = Propylene Glycol
A = Acetol
363
H=
# H=
Hydrogen
Hydrogen
# Rate of reaction
r1 = (k1 * bG * CG) / (1 + bG * CG + bA * CA + bP * CP)
Nomenclature
r2
Y ==pressure
(k2 * bA drop
* CA correlation,
* bH * PH) / Pa
((1 + bG * CG + bA * CA + bP * CP) * (1 + sqrt(bH * PH))
^ 2)
Ac = reactor cross sectional area
= catalyst density, kg.m-3
= reactor
# Rate bed void
constant
P o = inlet feed pressure, Pa
k1 = k1o * exp(-E1 / (Rg * T))
k2==inlet
k2o feed density,
* exp(-E2 kg.m-3
/ (Rg * T))
Dp = catalyst particle diameter, m
G = superficial mass velocity, kg.m-2.s-1
# Experimental data
k1o = 1.5E+04
k2o = 7.16E+03
E1 = 86.56
Step
E2 = 1: Weight of Catalyst
57.80
Design Assumption: The system is first assume to be operated under isobaric and
isothermal
bG = bGo * exp(QG / (Rg * T))
condition.
bA = bAo *The side reaction
exp(QA of glycerol is omitted as the degradation of glycerol is very
/ (Rg * T))
small
bP = bPo * exp(QP / (Rg * T))
(2.77%).
Using
bH Polymath:
= bHo * exp(QH / (Rg * T))
QH = 36.24# Nomenclature
bGo
#F= =molar
2.22E-03
flow rate, mol.s-1
bAo = 8.73E-03
# bj = adsorption rate constant for species j, m3.mol-1
bPo
# bjo==5.80E-03
preexponential factor of adsorption rate constant for species j,
bHo =
m3.mol-11.86E-05
QG
# C= = 36.42
molar concentration, mol.m-3
QA
# Ei =25.94
= activation energy of the i-th reaction, mol.g-1.s-1
QP
# ki==25.77
rate constant of the i-th reation, mol-1.g-1.s-1
# kio = preexponential factor of rate constant of the i-th reaction, mol-1.g-
1.s-1
# W = mass of catalyst, g
Rg
# P==0.008314
pressure, MPa
T
#=Qj473
= adsorption activation energy of species j, kJ.mol-1
Po =4
# Rg = universal gas constant, kJ.mol-1.K-1
# ri = rate of the ith reaction, mol.g-1.s-1
# T = temperature, K
# Initial Concentration
CTo = Po * 1000 / (Rg * T)
# for subscripts
# G = Glycerol
# Concentration
P = Propylene Glycol
FT
# A==FG + FA + FP + FH
Acetol
364
365
CG = CTo * FG / FT
CA = CTo * FA / FT
CP = CTo * FP / FT
CH = CTo * FH / FT
PH = CH * Rg * T / 1000
# Calculation Limit,g
W(0) = 0
W(f) = 1675000
366
367
# Ac = reactor cross sectional area
# denC = catalyst density, kg.m-3
# void = reactor bed void
# Po = inlet feed pressure, Pa
# denF = inlet feed density, kg.m-3
# dp = catalyst particle diameter, m
# Gv = superficial mass velocity, kg.m-2.s-
1
# m = mass flow rate of system, kg.s-1
# u = gas viscosity, kg.m-1.s-1
# Weight of catalyst, kg
W(0) = 0
W(f) = 1675
For packed
Table bed reactor,
2: Calculated 3.0for
values ft variables
of quenchfor
zone and 1.0
pressure ft offrom
drop support grid are typical
included.
polymath.
Total height of the reactor, L = Lbed + Lquench +
Lsupport
= 1.93 + (3.0 x 0.3048) + (1.0 x
0.3048)
= 3.15 m
368
369
Figure 2: Graph of Y against weight of catalyst,
W.
From Polymath calculation, at weight of catalyst, W= 1657 kg, Y =
0.9954615
P = Y x P0 = 0.9954615 x 40 = 39.82
bar
Pressure drop = 40.00 – 39.82 = 0.18
bar
Cooling system is required for the reactor as the reaction that takes place in the reactor
is
exothermic reaction. Cooling water operating from 25˚C to 50˚C is used as the utility in
reactor shell side.
370
Properties of cooling water at average
temperature
Average temperature = 37.5˚C = 310.5
K
Density, ρ = 990.00 kg/m3
For a vessel type reactor, cooling jacket length is typically 80% of reactor bed
length.
Ljacket = 0.80 x 3.15 = 2.52 m
The heat transfer system represent a cross flow system across a tube. The correlation of
heat
transfer across a tube bank is given as such: Nu = C(Re)nPr1/3
For large Nu value, the Re is expected to be large. From Heat Transfer by J. P. Holman,
for
high Re, C =0.0266, n = 0.805
371
Mechanical Design
The material of construction for the packed bed reactor is stainless steel type 316 as it
has
good corrosion resistance properties. The reactor is operating at high temperature and
pressure. High temperature water will cause corrosion on the packed bed reactor.
Hence,
stainless steel type 316 with good corrosion resistance properties is chosen to be the
material
of construction for the reactor. From table 13.2 in Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical
2
Engineering Design, stainless steel type 316 has design stress, f of 120 N/mm at
temperature
of 200˚C which is higher than the reactor design pressure. Besides, the stainless steel
372
type
316 has good tensile strength which is 520 N/mm 2 which makes it suitable to be used
for the
material of construction for high operating temperature and pressure reactor.
A double welded butt type of welding is used for the reactor in order to balance the
tradeoff
between the higher cost and higher strength of weld joint. The welded joint efficiency, J
of
the double welded butt type of welding is 0.85 which shown in table 13.3 in Coulson and
Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design.
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure of 4.4 N/mm 2, the wall
thickness of
the reactor is acceptable.
The type of head for the reactor is hemispherical head due to the high pressure of the
reactor.
According to Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, the head
thickness for
hemispherical
Head thicknesshead
= 0.6is x0.6
t =times
0.6 xof
33the
mm reactor
= 19.8wall thickness.
mm
373
Corrosion allowance = 2.00 mm
2
Since the MAWP is greater than the operating pressure of 4.4 N/mm , the thickness
of the
reactor head is acceptable.
46.83 46.83
93.35 92.98
2.2 2.2
-46.52 -46.15
44.63 44.63
91.15 90.78
375
Maximum compressive where the vessel is not under = 0.49 + 0.18 =
pressure =
0.67 N/mm2
As the maximum allowable design stress is smaller than critical buckling stress, the
design is
satisfactory.
The skirt base angle is satisfactory as the angle is in between 80˚ and
90˚.
The maximum dead weight load on the skirt will occur when the vessel is full of
water.
The skirt thickness should be such that under the worst combination of wind and dead
weight
loading. 2 design criteria must be satisfied:
376
The skirt material is chosen to be stainless steel 316 with maximum allowable design
stress at
ambient temperature is 175 N/mm2. The Young modulus, E of stainless steel type 316 is
197500 MPa.
fs = 175 N/mm2
J = 0.85
=82.17˚
E = 197500 MPa
ts = 45 mm
Ds = 2500 mm
[Satisfy]
[Satisfy]
377
From Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design Figure 13.30, the bolt type
selected is M30 as it is the closest standard size bolt larger than 25.53mm. Its root area
is 561
mm2.
Calculated according to the Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the
optimum
pipe (and nozzle) diameter.
At temperature = 200˚C, pressure = 40
bar
W = Mass flow rate = 10979.72 kg/hr
ρ = 1130.00kg/m3
By referring to ASME B36. 10M and B36.19, the 2-1/2 in. stainless steel Sch. 80 is
used.
(OD = 73mm, wall thickness = 7.01 mm)
Product Outlet
Calculated according to the Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the
optimum
pipe (and nozzle) diameter.
At temperature = 200˚C, pressure = 40
bar
W = Mass flow rate = 12181.38 kg/hr
ρ = 21.40 kg/m3
By referring to ASME B36. 10M and B36.19, the 10 in. stainless steel Sch. 80 is used.
(OD =
273.1mm, wall thickness = 12.70 mm)
Calculated according to the Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the
optimum
pipe (and nozzle) diameter.
At temperature = 25˚C, pressure = 1
bar
W = Mass flow rate = 30877.41 kg/hr
ρ = 995.00 kg/m3
By referring to ASME B36. 10M and B36.19, the 4 in. stainless steel Sch. 80 is used.
(OD =
114.3mm, wall thickness = 8.56 mm)
379
Cooling water outlet
Calculated according to the Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the
optimum
pipe (and nozzle) diameter.
At temperature = 50˚C, pressure = 1
bar
W = Mass flow rate = 30877.41 kg/hr
ρ = 984.00 kg/m3
By referring to ASME B36. 10M and B36.19, the 4 in. stainless steel Sch. 80 is used.
(OD =
114.3mm, wall thickness = 8.56 mm)
Aspen simulation
380
Appendix I: Auxiliary Equipment Design
I.1 Pump, P-101
General
Pump design
381
Calculated according to the Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the
optimum
pipe (and nozzle) diameter.
W = Mass flow rate = 10979.72 kg/hr
ρ = 1250.00kg/m3
By referring to ASME B36. 10M and B36.19, the 2-1/2 in. stainless steel Sch. 40 is
used.
(OD = 73mm, wall thickness = 5.16 mm, ID = 62.68 mm )
The friction factor, f is determined through moody diagram with known Reynold
number, Re
and relative roughness, ε/D.
Using roughness of commercial steel pipe, ε =
0.046mm
382
From the moody diagram, the friction factor is
0.022
Let length of pipe = 10m
383
From the graph, when the volumetric flow rate 8.78 m3/hr (38.66 GPM), NPSHR = 3.50
m.
NPSHA > NPSHR, no cavitation happened, the pump is
applicable.
The efficiency of the motor is determined in the previous graph. From the graph,
when the
volumetric flow rate 8.78 m3/hr (38.66 GPM) and total head of 319.94 m, the
efficiency is
65%.
Pump
Name P-101
Property method NRTL
Henry's component list ID
Electrolyte chemistry ID
Use true species approach for
electrolytes YES
Free-water phase properties method STEAM-TA
Water solubility method 3
Model Type
Specified discharge pressure [bar]
Specified pressure increase [bar]
40
384
Specified pressure ratio
Specified power required [kW]
Pump efficiencies
Driver efficiencies
Suction area [sqm]
Hydraulic static head [m-kgf/kg]
Number of curves
Operating shaft speed [rpm]
Impeller diameter [meter]
EO Model components
Fluid power [kW]
Calculated brake power [kW]
Electricity [kW]
Volumetric flow rate [l/min] 9.37303472
Calculated discharge pressure [bar] 23.4845978
Calculated pressure change [bar] 23.4845978
Calculated pressure ratio 144.200534
NPSH available [m-kgf/kg] 40
NPSH required 39
Head developed [m-kgf/kg]
Pump efficiency used
Net work required [kW]
Specific speed, operating 8.03537229
Suction sp. speed, operating
Head coefficient
Flow coefficient 313.379646
Total feed stream CO2e flow [kg/hr] 0.399114125
Total product stream CO2e flow [kg/hr] 23.4845978
Net stream CO2e production [kg/hr]
Utility CO2e production [kg/hr]
Total CO2e production [kg/hr]
Utility usage
Utility cost
Utility ID
0
0
0
0
0
Calculated according to the Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the
optimum
pipe (and nozzle) diameter.
W = Mass flow rate = 9291.40 kg/hr
ρ = 1079.00kg/m3
By referring to ASME B36. 10M and B36.19, the 2-1/2 in. stainless steel Sch. 40 is
used.
(OD = 73mm, wall thickness = 5.16 mm, ID = 62.68 mm )
The friction factor, f is determined through moody diagram with known Reynold
number, Re
and relative roughness, ε/D.
Using roughness of commercial steel pipe, ε =
0.046mm
386
From the moody diagram, the friction factor is
0.032
Let length of pipe = 10m
387
From the graph, when the volumetric flow rate 8.61 m3/hr (37.91 GPM), NPSHR = 3.50
m.
NPSHA > NPSHR, no cavitation happened, the pump is
applicable.
The efficiency of the motor is determined in the previous graph. From the graph,
when the
volumetric flow rate 8.61 m3/hr (37.91GPM) and total head of 1.80 m, the efficiency
is
unable to determine. However, the efficiency of the pump is assumed to be 60%.
Pump
Name P-301
Property method NRTL
Henry's component list ID
Electrolyte chemistry ID
Use true species approach for
electrolytes YES
Free-water phase properties method STEAM-TA
Water solubility method 3
Model Type
Specified discharge pressure [bar]
Specified pressure increase [bar]
1.01
388
Specified pressure ratio
Specified power required [kW]
Pump efficiencies
Driver efficiencies
Suction area [sqm]
Hydraulic static head [m-kgf/kg]
Number of curves
Operating shaft speed [rpm]
Impeller diameter [meter]
EO Model components
Fluid power [kW]
Calculated brake power [kW]
Electricity [kW]
Volumetric flow rate [l/min] 0.002861542
Calculated discharge pressure [bar] 0.006726391
Calculated pressure change [bar] 0.006726391
Calculated pressure ratio 171.692546
NPSH available [m-kgf/kg] 1.01
NPSH required 0.01
Head developed [m-kgf/kg]
Pump efficiency used
Net work required [kW]
Specific speed, operating 0.043748445
Suction sp. speed, operating
Head coefficient
Flow coefficient 0.113074923
Total feed stream CO2e flow [kg/hr] 0.425420192
Total product stream CO2e flow [kg/hr] 0.006726391
Net stream CO2e production [kg/hr]
Utility CO2e production [kg/hr]
Total CO2e production [kg/hr]
Utility usage
Utility cost
Utility ID
0
0
0
0
0
Calculated according to the Harker equation (1978), modified for SI unit, for the
optimum
pipe (and nozzle) diameter.
W = Mass flow rate = 7260.32 kg/hr
ρ = 1037.00kg/m3
By referring to ASME B36. 10M and B36.19, the 2-1/2 in. stainless steel Sch. 40 is
used.
(OD = 73mm, wall thickness = 5.16 mm, ID = 62.68 mm )
The friction factor, f is determined through moody diagram with known Reynold
number, Re
and relative roughness, ε/D.
Using roughness of commercial steel pipe, ε =
0.046mm
390
From the moody diagram, the friction factor is
0.032
Let length of pipe = 10m
391
From the graph, when the volumetric flow rate 7.00 m3/hr (30.82 GPM), NPSHR = 3.45
m.
NPSHA > NPSHR, no cavitation happened, the pump is
applicable.
The efficiency of the motor is determined in the previous graph. From the graph,
when the
volumetric flow rate 7.00 m3/hr (30.82GPM) and total head of 1.93 m, the efficiency
is
unable to determine. However, the efficiency of the pump is assumed to be 60%.
Pump
Name P-401
Property method NRTL
Henry's component list ID
Electrolyte chemistry ID
Use true species approach for
electrolytes YES
Free-water phase properties method STEAM-TA
Water solubility method 3
Model Type
Specified discharge pressure [bar]
Specified pressure increase [bar]
1.01
392
Specified pressure ratio
Specified power required [kW]
Pump efficiencies
Driver efficiencies
Suction area [sqm]
Hydraulic static head [m-kgf/kg]
Number of curves
Operating shaft speed [rpm]
Impeller diameter [meter]
EO Model components
Fluid power [kW]
Calculated brake power [kW]
Electricity [kW]
Volumetric flow rate [l/min] 0.002379003
Calculated discharge pressure [bar] 0.005984053
Calculated pressure change [bar] 0.005984053
Calculated pressure ratio 142.740184
NPSH available [m-kgf/kg] 1.01
NPSH required 0.01
Head developed [m-kgf/kg]
Pump efficiency used
Net work required [kW]
Specific speed, operating 0.192544841
Suction sp. speed, operating
Head coefficient
Flow coefficient 0.120287988
Total feed stream CO2e flow [kg/hr] 0.39755712
Total product stream CO2e flow [kg/hr] 0.005984053
Net stream CO2e production [kg/hr]
Utility CO2e production [kg/hr]
Total CO2e production [kg/hr]
Utility usage
Utility cost
Utility ID
0
0
0
0
0
393
Design method
The compressor design is based on the calculation method in Coulson and
Richardson’s
Chemical Engineering Design.
Compressor Design
394
3
From the figure, when the volumetric flow rate is 2.77 m /s, the E p =
72%
395
Since the power is >4000 kW, efficiency is
97%
Compr
Name C-101
Property method NRTL
Henry's component list ID
Electrolyte chemistry ID
Use true species approach for
electrolytes YES
Free-water phase properties method STEAM-TA
Water solubility method 3
ASME-
POLYTROP
Model Type 40
Specified discharge pressure [bar]
Specified pressure increase [bar]
Specified pressure ratio
Specified power required [kW]
Isentropic efficiency
Mechanical efficiency
Polytropic efficiency
EO Model components
Indicated horsepower [kW]
Calculated brake horsepower [kW]
Net work required [kW]
Power loss [kW] 3165.96146
Efficiency (polytropic / isentropic) used 3165.96146
Calculated discharge pressure [bar] 3165.96146
Calculated pressure change [bar] 0
Calculated pressure ratio 0.72
Outlet temperature [C] 40
Isentropic outlet temperature [C] 39
Vapor fraction 40
995.141335
590.968286
1
396
Displacement
Volumetric efficiency
Head developed [m-kgf/kg]
1048157.67
Isentropic power requirement [kW]
1810.19935
Inlet heat capacity ratio
1.40629496
Inlet volumetric flow rate [l/min]
166365.103
Outlet volumetric flow rate [l/min]
17400.5788
Inlet compressibility factor
1
Outlet compressibility factor
1
Compressor percent above surge
Percent below stonewall
Surge volume flow rate
Stonewall volume flow rate
Shaft speed
Specific speed
Inlet Mach number
Total feed stream CO2e flow [kg/hr]
Total product stream CO2e flow [kg/hr]
Net stream CO2e production [kg/hr]
Utility CO2e production [kg/hr]
Total CO2e production [kg/hr] 0
Utility usage 0
Utility cost 0
Utility ID 0
0
397
Water Bottom (Liquid)
Calculate a liquid density of each component by using liquid density equation and
constant
for each component at desired
temperature:
………………………………………………. (Equation of liquid
density)
, T (K)
Top Bottom
383.29 289.88
656.29 562.88
Component A B n Tc T.range
723 291.33-723
Glycerol 0.3491 0.249 0.1541
Ethylene
Glycol 0.325 0.255 0.172 645 260.15-645
Density of Liquid for propylene glycol (Bottom) are calculated by using the formula
below
(Perry Handbook);
398
c1 c2 c3 c4
Propylene glycol 1.0923 0.26106 626 0.20459
Density of Liquid for methanol, acetol and hydrogen are calculated from
ASPEN;
Component (BOTTOM) Density (kg/m3) Mole frac ρL(kg/m3)TOTAL
Acetol 739.258 0.014.194562111
Methanol 275.643 0.013.465660198 7.660222309
= = ……………………………………………….. (2)
…………………………………………………………………….. (3)
Propylene Ethylene
Component Glycerol Hydrogen Glycol Glycol Methanol Acetol Water
MW 92.1 1 76.09 62.07 32.04 74.08 18.02
P 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Distillate T 656.29
Bottom T
Vapor density 562.88 562.88 562.88 562.88 562.88 562.88
(distillate)
Vapor density 0.73309
(bottom)
8.02394716 28.01723752 0.667043393 0.344322061 0.35927327 6.72257044
ut = 2.2458 m/s
us = 2.2458 m/s
Orientation = vertical
400
Vapor volumetric flow rate, Vv =
Dv)
Dv = 0.4654 m = 4.4263 ft
462))
Liquid volume holdup inside the vessel = (Liquid volumetric flow rate, VL x holdup
time)
Liquid volume holdup inside the vessel = 1.2328
m3
Liquid depth required, hL = = 3.2033 m
Total height =
401
Step 4: Determine the dimension of demister pad
Type of demister pad used in designing flash drum is Knitted mesh. Material used is
stainless
steel 304.
Table 13.3 (page 813), Coulson Richardson Double welded butt, spot
radiography
402
Actual design stress, Jf = Welded joint efficiency, J + Design
stress, f
Jf = 0.85 × 1004 = 853.4 bar
Uw = 160 km/h
403
Wind loading per unit length, Fw = 913.92
N/m
Bending moment, Mx is calculated by using this
equation:
404
Bolt design stress, fb = 125 N/mm2 (Typical design
value)
Standard bolt used = M24
Root area = 353 mm2 (British standard BS 4190, Figure 13.30 Coulson
Richardson)
Per bolt diameter = 24 mm
Feed
Top (Vapour)
Bending stress,
Radial stress,
406
Resultant longitudinal stress
(downwind),
Upwind Downwind
220 220
σ1=σh
Design method
The expander design is based on Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design.
407
Expander Design
The type of expander used is centrifugal expander. The typical value of expansion
ratio for
centrifugal type of expander is in between 6 to 8. Let the expansion ratio = 7.
From the figure, when the volumetric flow rate is 0.0029 m3/s, the Ep =
61%
408
Step 3: Actual Power generated
409
Step 2 : Reflux Drum Volume
By referring to heuristics, the volume of liquid retained in the reflux drum is 50% of
the
reflux drum’s total volume.
Volume of cylinder,
From general guide for length to diameter ratio in page 463 of Coulson and Richardson’s
Chemical Engineering Design,
D=
410
L
By referring to heuristics, the volume of liquid retained in the reflux drum is 50% of
the
reflux drum’s total volume.
Volume of cylinder,
From general guide for length to diameter ratio in page 463 of Coulson and Richardson’s
Chemical Engineering Design,
411
For P = 1.00 bar
D=
412
By referring to heuristics, the volume of liquid retained in the reflux drum is 50% of
the
reflux drum’s total volume.
Volume of cylinder,
From general guide for length to diameter ratio in page 463 of Coulson and Richardson’s
Chemical Engineering Design,
D=
413
Appendix J: Minutes of Meeting
Minutes of meeting 1
Attendance:
Activities:
1. Task segregation.
Minutes of meeting 2
414
Date: 23th September 2018 Time: 9.00 pm – 11.00 pm
Attendance:
Activities:
3. In the meeting, we had drafted the comparison table of all three processes
that
we decide to choose. However, the description is not detailed enough. We
decide to edit the comparison table in google drive if any of us found
anything
suitable that should be added in the
table.
4. Decide one process to choose for production of propylene
glycol.
5. We decide to compile this task on 26/9/2018.
Minutes of meeting 3
415
Venue: Lembaran Cafeteria
Attendance:
Activities:
5. The capacity of plant needs to include world demand, consumption and any
information related to Malaysia.
416
Minutes of meeting 4
Attendance:
Activities:
2. During the meeting, we able to complete MSDS for all chemicals involved in
the process.
Minutes of meeting 5
Attendance:
417
1. Joan Mary A/P Patrick George
Activities:
1. Discuss what equipment to use along the process from raw material until the
desired product.
2. Design the process flow and draw the block flow diagram
(BFD).
3. Find information on operating condition to be use in the
process.
4. Draw the process flow diagram (PFD) using Microsoft Visio.
Minutes of meeting 6
Attendance:
418
9. Nurul Afini binti Fuad
Activities:
Minutes of meeting 7
Attendance:
419
Activities:
Minutes of meeting 8
Attendance:
Activities:
10. Calculated vapor pressure, dew point and bubble point by using Antione
Equation.
420
Minutes of meeting 9
Attendance:
Activities:
Minutes of meeting 10
Attendance:
421
Activities:
Minutes of meeting 11
Attendance:
Activities:
7. Task segregation.
Minutes of meeting 12
Attendance:
422
9. Joan Mary A/P Patrick George
Activities:
Minutes of meeting 13
Attendance:
Activities:
Minutes of meeting 14
423
425
Attendance:
Activities:
9. Task compilation
424