Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 97 views

    Apa Anova

    Uploaded by

    Sana Jutt
    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tables are not typically included in papers but the results are reported. If an ANOVA is statistically significant, the paper should report the p-value and include a table showing the results of post-hoc analyses comparing groups. Two examples of post-hoc analysis tables are shown, one using subscripts and one listing the comparisons numerically. The best practice is to include a table with the actual p-values like the third example given.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Apa Anova

    Uploaded by

    Sana Jutt
    97 views2 pages
    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tables are not typically included in papers but the results are reported. If an ANOVA is statistically significant, the paper should report the p-value and include a table showing the results of post-hoc analyses comparing groups. Two examples of post-hoc analysis tables are shown, one using subscripts and one listing the comparisons numerically. The best practice is to include a table with the actual p-values like the third example given.

    Original Title

    APA ANOVA (1).docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tables are not typically included in papers but the results are reported. If an ANOVA is statistically significant, the paper should report the p-value and include a table showing the results of post-hoc analyses comparing groups. Two examples of post-hoc analysis tables are shown, one using subscripts and one listing the comparisons numerically. The best practice is to include a table with the actual p-values like the third example given.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    97 views2 pages

    Apa Anova

    Uploaded by

    Sana Jutt
    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tables are not typically included in papers but the results are reported. If an ANOVA is statistically significant, the paper should report the p-value and include a table showing the results of post-hoc analyses comparing groups. Two examples of post-hoc analysis tables are shown, one using subscripts and one listing the comparisons numerically. The best practice is to include a table with the actual p-values like the third example given.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

    For most paper publications including your capstone projects ANOVA tables are not
    included. These tables look like data in the results worksheet when you run an ANOVA
    in EZAnalyze, Excel, or SPSS. They include the degrees of freedom in the analysis, the
    within group and between group variance numbers, the calculated F value and the p value
    for the test. The assumption in a paper is that you are not going to talk much about an
    ANOVA analysis if it is not statistically significant and if it is, you will report the post
    hoc analysis of the group means. If an ANOVA is statistically significant report the p
    value of the test in the text and then include and describe a table that shows the post hoc
    analysis.

    ANOVA post-hoc analysis table

    Nicol and Pexman (2010) show two versions of how to do post hoc tables (Example
    tables 1 and 2). You will see many other solutions to post hoc tables as you read articles.
    Following APA’s mandate that actual p values are reported in tables when possible we
    provide Table 3 as an example. None of these work very well if you are comparing more
    than 4 groups.

    Table 1
    ANOVA Comparisons of High School Proficiency Tests From Four Adjacent Years

    Group n Mean SD
    1998 256 b 79.71 13.40
    1999 307 b,c 82.34 13.30
    2000 287 a,b,c 88.69 7.49
    2001 292 a,b, 92.23 6.57
    Shared subscripts represent statistically significant differences: a = p < .05, b = p < .01, c = p < .001
    Table 2
    ANOVA Comparisons of High School Proficiency Tests From Four Adjacent Years

    Group n Mean SD Post hoc


    1998 (1) 256 79.71 13.40 1<2<3<4
    1999 (2) 307 82.34 13.30 1<2<3<4
    2000 (3) 287 88.69 7.49 1<2<3<4
    2001 (4) 292 92.23 6.57 1<2<3<4
    Note. The numbers in parentheses in group names refer to the numbers used in illustrating statistically
    significant differences.

    Table 3
    ANOVA Comparisons of High School Proficiency Tests From Four Adjacent Years

    Tukey’s HSD Comparisons


    Group n Mean SD 1998 1999 2000
    1998 256 79.71 13.40
    1999 307 82.34 13.30 .005
    2000 287 88.69 7.49 < .001 < .001
    2001 292 92.23 6.57 < .001 < .001 < .032

    You might also like