Kuis RQ
Kuis RQ
Kuis RQ
(b) 1. Though it is recognized that revenue is earned throughout the entire production process,
generally it is not feasible to measure revenue on the basis of operating activity. It is not feasible
because of the absence of suitable criteria for consistently and objectively arriving at a periodic
determination of the amount of revenue to recognize.
Also, in most situations the sale represents the most important single step in the earnings
process. Prior to the sale, the amount of revenue anticipated from the processes of produc-tion
is merely prospective revenue; its realization remains to be validated by actual sales. The
accumulation of costs during production does not alone generate revenue. Rather, revenues are
earned by the completion of the entire process, including making sales.
Thus, as a general rule, the sale cannot be regarded as being an unduly conservative basis for
the timing of revenue recognition. Except in unusual circumstances, revenue recognition prior to
sale would be anticipatory in nature and unverifiable in amount.
2. To criticize the sales basis as not being sufficiently conservative because accounts receiv-
able do not represent disposable funds, it is necessary to assume that the collection of
receivables is the decisive step in the earnings process and that periodic revenue measure-
ment and, therefore, net income should depend on the amount of cash generated during the
period. This assumption disregards the fact that the sale usually represents the decisive factor
in the earnings process and substitutes for it the administrative function of managing and
collecting receivables. In other words, the investment of funds in receivables should be
regarded as a policy designed to increase total revenues, properly recognized at the point of
sale, and the cost of managing receivables (e.g., bad debts and collection costs) should be
matched with the sales in the proper period.
The fact that some revenue adjustments (e.g., sales returns) and some expenses (e.g., bad
debts and collection costs) may occur in a period subsequent to the sale does not detract from
the overall usefulness of the sales basis for the timing of revenue recognition. Both can be
estimated with sufficient accuracy so as not to detract from the reliability of reported net income.
Thus, in the vast majority of cases for which the sales basis is used, estimating errors, though
unavoidable, will be too immaterial in amount to warrant deferring revenue recognition to a later
point in time.
(c) 1. During production. This basis of recognizing revenue is frequently used by firms whose
major source of revenue is long-term construction projects. For these firms the point of sale is
far less significant to the earnings process than is production activity because the sale is
assured under the contract (except of course where performance is not substantially in
accordance with the contract terms).
To defer income recognition until the completion of long-term construction projects could impair
significantly the usefulness of the intervening annual financial statements because the volume
of contracts completed during a period is likely to bear no relationship to production volume.
During each year that a project is in process a portion of the contract price is, therefore,
appropriately recognized as that year’s revenue. The amount of the contract price to be
recognized should be proportionate to the year’s production progress on the project.
Income might be recognized on a production basis for some products whose salability at a
known price can be reasonably determined as might be the case with some precious metals
and agricultural products.
It should be noted that the use of the production basis in lieu of the sales basis for the timing of
revenue recognition is justifiable only when total profit or loss on the contracts can be estimated
with reasonable accuracy and its ultimate realization is reasonably assured.
2. At end of production. The cost-recovery method recognizes contract revenue only to the
extent of costs incurred that are expected to be recoverable. Once all costs are recognized,
profit is recognized.
Companies use the cost-recovery method when a company cannot meet the conditions for using the
percentage-of-completion method, or when there are inherent hazards in the contract beyond the
normal, recurring business risks.