Reflection 7
Reflection 7
Reflection 7
The bottom of the pyramid" social entrepreneurship is that depending on wealth and
income differentiate, the top of the pyramid is rich, with plenty of access to high
incomes; more than 4 billion people with a daily income of less than $2 live in a
pyramid full of life.
Over the past 50 years, the World Bank, survivors, various international aid agencies,
central governments of various countries, and civil society organizations that have
joined since then have tried their best to eradicate poverty, but none of them have
achieved their goals.
The obvious shocking fact is that CK Prahhalad puts forward a very simple but
extremely revolutionary proposition in his book, Fortune of the Pyramid “(the wealth
at the bottom of the pyramid), Don't take it anymore The victims of the poor population
or the social burden, but to see them as dynamic, creative entrepreneurs and potential
consumers, a new opportunity will open
2. In the Labor Voices case, what was Kohl Gill's vision for the company?
Kohl Gill’s vision was a system that would allow workers to communicate the
conditions in the workplace using cell phones to a company that could collect data and
relay it to the necessary parties. Not only would this help the workers’ rights, but it
would also give timely accurate and complete intelligence to the companies that are
outsourcing the work to Southern India. This intelligence gained from taking the
information given by workers would be very valuable to companies. Having to date
supply chain data with minimal cost could be a huge competitive advantage. And it
seemed as if there were a variety of markets, which could use a system that he named
LaborVoices.
All 7 of Gill’s option appear to be decent ones, so picking just one of the models may
not be the best way. The idea of charging the garment workers a small fee for the service
should be thrown out. These workers are making little enough already without offering
their input to LaborVoices. They will be more enticed to offer information if it is free.
The next idea of playing advertisements should be thrown out as well. Having
advertisements trying to sell something to the workers giving information would give
the feeling that LaborVoices is trying to sell them something more than help the workers.
Rather than looking for its income from the small fish that LaborVoices wants to help,
Gill should target the big fish that have a use for his information.
4. "Social entrepreneurship" that alleviates poverty and inequality is must less prevalent
that "environmental entrepreneurship". Why do you think that is? Do any of the
readings help you answer this question?
There are several differences between environmental entrepreneurship and social
entrepreneurship. The latter is founded based on specific socioeconomic contexts that
urge the need for addressing various issues mostly raised by inequality. Social
entrepreneurship is crucial when it comes to poverty alleviation, as focuses on solving
the problem and not only on profit maximization. Social initiatives aim at producing
the desired changes even without a commercial model. Instead of products they create
and deliver values and improve social welfare. On the other hand, they can’t guarantee
financial viability. Social entrepreneurship through the business to make people get
involved to achieve alleviates poverty and inequality. Like the LaborVoices case, this
case brought to light the different strategies social entrepreneurs can use to help the
likelihood that their venture will succeed. But the environmental entrepreneurship use
the different ways which people are easy to overlook.