Report on Clergy Sexual Abuse

Pastoral Letter
Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ: to prevent abuse, address it when it happens,
and prevent cover-ups from ever happening
Although I am writing today to all the again.” Such steps, they affirmed, should focus
faithful of the Archdiocese of Vancouver, I on “the healing of the victim, the community
wish to begin by addressing personally the and the offender.” Furthermore, increased
victims/survivors of the clerical sexual abuse attention must be paid to the underlying causes
of minors and vulnerable adults that has taken of sexual abuse in the Church, if we are to
place in the Church. eradicate it and fulfill our evangelizing mission
This past year, guided by divine of proclaiming the Gospel.
Providence, we have studied and learned more To move forward with the Committee’s
than ever before about the pain suffered by recommendations, I then set up an
you, victims/survivors of clerical sexual abuse Implementation Working Group. It was
in our Archdiocese. mandated to draw up responses to the
I realize that no expression of regret can recommendations and to work out the practical
repair the horror of what happened. Although details of how each one is to be carried out.
nothing can undo the wrong that was done Some of the recommendations have already
to you, I nonetheless wish to offer each of been implemented; others will be in the very
you my heartfelt apology for the trauma, the near future; and some require more time and
violation in body and soul, and the sense of reflection before being acted upon. Certainly,
betrayal and abandonment by the Church that a great deal of work remains to be done. I urge
you feel. For those occasions when we failed to you to study carefully each recommendation
protect you or when we were more concerned and response, so that you will become familiar
with the Church’s reputation than with your with the commitments the Archdiocese has
suffering, I am truly sorry and ask for your made.
forgiveness as I strive to make amends and As we move along the path of healing and
bind your wounds. purifying the Church, let us remember that,
Even though the brutality of the sexual insofar as one member of Christ’s Body suffers,
abuse of minors and vulnerable adults is a “all suffer together” (1 Cor 12:26). Going
widespread tragedy that affects every corner of society, marked by greater transparency and accountability in
forward, our task is to work together to eliminate the
it has taken the Catholic Church around the world all that we do.
scourge of abuse and to ensure that our Church, as a
far too long to address its particularly devastating An initial step in this commitment was the
loving Mother, is a safe place especially for the young
consequences when that abuse is perpetrated by a formation in October 2018 of an Archdiocesan
and the vulnerable, the protection of whose God-
priest, whom the faithful hold in a position of trust. Case Review Committee. It was charged with
given dignity is entrusted to us.
Such abuse readily leads to shame, confusion, guilt, conducting “a prospective review of cases involving
and loss of faith – all of which have painful, lifelong the abuse of children and adults by clergy and to † J. Michael Miller, CSB
effects on victims. assess the effectiveness, identify gaps, and make Archbishop of Vancouver
I invite and encourage any victim/survivor recommendations for the improvement of the
of sexual abuse at the hands of anyone assigned RCAV’s policies, practices and procedures in this Table of Contents
to ministry in the Archdiocese of Vancouver to context.” Case Review Committee 2–3
come forward and report the incident. It is our I owe an enormous debt of gratitude to the
responsibility to walk with you and provide for your Committee’s 13 extraordinarily hard-working and List of 31 recommendations 4–8
psychological and spiritual well-being and that of dedicated members, which included a majority of Moving ahead — with sorrow but
your families. laity representing various occupations and four self- determination 9
Now is the time for us to address more fully what identified victims/survivors of clerical sexual abuse.
Canadian bishops stand by strong
we, as the local Church, can do to respond better to Over a period of nine months, they conscientiously
statement on sexual abuse 9
the needs of victims of abuse, as well as improve our carried out their mandate of reviewing cases from
policies and procedures that have been in place for 1950 to the present. Bearing this review in mind, Legal issues 10
many years. All these efforts going forward entail a the Committee made 31 recommendations that were
Criminal convictions, lawsuits settled,
profound and continuous conversion of our hearts. presented to me in mid-July and have now been and other public cases 11
Such a conversion must be accompanied by a firm published as written, without any editing.
commitment to take concrete and effective action The members called on me “to take concrete steps Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 12
S-2 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE NOVEMBER 25, 2019

Process and reflections from the Case Review Committee

Introduction

I
n the fall of 2018 following the disclosure of global sexual abuse by clergy and on the advice and prompting of
some victim-survivors as well as many others searching for justice, Archbishop J. Michael Miller, CSB, appointed
a Committee to conduct a file review of historical cases of sexual abuse by clergy who served or resided in the
Archdiocese of Vancouver. The first step consisted of three members of the Committee — two lawyers, together with
the Archdiocesan lawyer and Chair of the Committee — beginning the work of reviewing files dealing with known
historical cases of sexual abuse in the Archdiocese of Vancouver. These lawyers compiled summaries of each case.
On Saturday, 27 October 2018 the Committee members gathered for the first time to begin the work of
discussing findings, seeking ways to improve protocols, and exploring improved practices of outreach and care for the
victim-survivors. At each of the Committee meetings, case summaries of each file were presented to the Committee
members by the three lawyers.

Mandate Raphael Donnelly: A retired criminal and provides advice on the formation and
prosecutor and led the Sexual Assault Division implementation of policies for responding to
The mandate of the Committee was to “conduct which specialized in Child Sexual Assault allegations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment.
a prospective review of cases involving the and Adult Rape; a victim of sexual abuse at a
abuse of children and adults by clergy and to Terry McLaughlin: A deacon of the Archdiocese
minor seminary; currently an instructor at the
assess the effectiveness, identify gaps, and make of Vancouver; his current ministry is serving
Archdiocese of Vancouver’s Seminary College of
recommendations for the improvement of the in chaplaincy in federal prisons; served for five
Christ the King, Mission, BC.
RCAV’s policies, practices and procedures in this years at Kwikwexwelhp Healing Village, a prison
context.” Gary Franken: Vicar General of the Archdiocese primarily for first nations inmates, a significant
of Vancouver and the current pastor of St. number of whom have suffered clerical sexual
Membership Anthony’s Parish, West Vancouver. abuse.
The membership of the Committee comprised of Sharon Goh: The Coordinator of Marriage Lynda Robitaille: A canon lawyer, both teaching
thirteen individuals from different professions and Preparation and Marriage ministries in the and practicing canon law with areas of specialty
backgrounds (including three lawyers appointed Archdiocese of Vancouver; previously served as in marriage nullity and procedural law, as well as
by the Archdiocese to review the files). This the first Safe Environment Co-Ordinator (2010- baptism and laity; currently also works as Dean of
Committee was comprised of five lawyers, one of 2016) in the Archdiocese and currently acts as Theology at St. Mark’s College.
whom was a canon lawyer, two members of the the Archbishop’s Deputy Delegate for receiving
clergy, a religious sister, a psychologist, two prison allegations of serious misconduct for all non- The Process
chaplains (one retired and one active), a hospital clerical Church employees. Seven meetings were held between October 2018
chaplain, an elementary school teacher, and a and June 2019, on Saturdays from 10 am to
Lawrence Ho: A lawyer advising families in
ministry coordinator. Four of the Committee 2 pm at the John Paul II Pastoral Centre of the
philanthropy; a former Board Member of Regent
members self-identified as victim-survivors of Archdiocese of Vancouver. The meetings were both
College Seminary.
clergy sexual-abuse. organized and supported by the administration
Eleven (11) members were Catholic; two (2) Bernadette Howell: A victim-survivor and and note-taking of Megan Rumohr, Assistant to
were not. victim-advocate; currently works as a Spiritual the Vicar General.
There was an equal mix of gender with seven Health Practitioner (hospital chaplain) at St. Paul’s Meetings commenced on October 27, 2018,
(7) members who were female and six (6) who Hospital, Vancouver. and continued on December 15, 2018, January 5,
were male. 2019, January 19, 2019, March 9, 2019, March
Leona Huggins: A victim-survivor and victim-
Members included: 30, 2019, May 11, 2019, June 8, 2019, with
advocate; currently works as an elementary school
Gerry Ayotte: Previously served with the National teacher and is the western Canadian representative recommendations finalized for presentation at the
Parole Board and Correctional Service of Canada, for S.N.A.P. (Survivors Network of those Abused July 13, 2019 meeting.
most recently as Regional Chaplain; a retired by Priests) and an active member of E.C.A. Before meetings commenced, Confidentiality
Registered Clinical Counsellor and currently the (Ending Clergy Abuse). Agreements were signed by all members of the
Archdiocese of Vancouver’s Representative to Committee.
Brenda Knight: A registered psychologist in At each meeting, case summaries were verbally
Prisons.
private practice who has assessed and treated presented by one of the three lawyers, the only
Kenneth Beatch: A defense lawyer with over children and adults who are victim/survivors of Committee members to have been given access to
thirty-years expertise in criminal law, and currently sexual trauma within families, institutions and the files. Upon request, very brief outline notes
runs a busy criminal practice. organizational settings for forty years and has (primarily indicating dates) were distributed to
consulted to government and agencies regarding accompany the summaries, and these outline notes
Nancy Brown: A Sister of Charity of St.
processes for reparation for institutional sexual were then returned to the Chair of the Committee
Vincent de Paul (Halifax), educator and retired
abuse. following the conclusion of each meeting.
ombudsperson, pastoral counselor and senior
manager of Covenant House Vancouver, as well Mary Margaret MacKinnon (Committee In total, twenty-five (25) cases, involving the
as a member of various boards; currently offers Chair): A lawyer in private practice who advises abuse of minors by clergy were presented, which
service on various local and national committees the Archdiocese of Vancouver; is also counsel to covered the time-span from 1950 to the present.
on anti-human trafficking. a number of other national religious institutions In total, one (1) case involving the abuse of a
NOVEMBER 25, 2019 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE S-3

Process and reflections from the Case Review Committee

minor not initially identified by the lawyers was the need for education, the tendency to believe Releasing the names of abusers helps everyone
presented to the Committee by the two victim- receiving counselling or treatment lessens risk of to understand how predators groom entire
survivors. further abuse, the issue of consent in clergy / laity communities and not to inform the community
In total, seven (7) cases involving the relationships, power imbalance, how to identify of predatory behaviours and actions is to put
inappropriate sexual behaviour/abuse between a and help all parties, education / training / vetting all members of the Church family in jeopardy.
cleric and adults were presented. / security. Not only this, not publishing names of abusers
In total, three (3) cases involving priests who The Catholic Church must be alert to the perpetuates betrayal and distrust. 
had fathered children were presented. fact that all opportunities to work with children
The public acknowledgement of an abuser
provide a platform for predators. All situations
offers one of the most important pathways to
Reflections where power and authority intersect with
healing for all victims, their families, and the
While Committee members have differing views vulnerability provide opportunities for abuse.
Church itself.
on a number of issues, all agree major change Screening, training and continuous monitoring
One injured child is too many. Every injured
is needed. The Committee urges prompt and of candidates for the priesthood and permanent
child is an injured adult.
decisive action by the Archbishop to accept our diaconate must at all times be extremely rigorous;
We are all victims of sexual abuse by clergy
recommendations. and a requirement for zero-tolerance for any
because:
As a Committee, we are calling on the boundary violations should be well established and
a) It happened to us
Archbishop of Vancouver to take concrete steps enforced.
b) It happened to people we know
to prevent abuse, address it when it happens, and The role of any member of the clergy is that
c) It was caused by people we trust
prevent cover-ups from ever happening again. of a community leader. All clergy must be made
d) It removes us from a community of faith which
Pope Francis identified what he sees as the aware of civil, criminal and canon law which
gave us a sense of belonging and place
major cause of the sex-abuse crisis: clericalism. includes the reporting of any sexual misconduct.
e) We are, together, the Body of Christ
Clericalism is a system that gives the clergy This is the absolute responsibility of any religious,
deacon, priest, or bishop in this Archdiocese, as The Committee has submitted its
immense influence over the laity, that exalts
well the responsibility of all Church employees, recommendations to the Archbishop of
them with pomp and pageantry; it is a system
and indeed of all the community. Vancouver (Archdiocesan Clerical Sexual Abuse
and culture which many agree has enabled
One of the most devastating realizations of Case Review Committee, Document I: Letter
priests for too long to abuse their power and
this Committee was a recognition that in these of Recommendations), and has asked that he
authority over others without any form of due
historical cases, victims who came forward had to publicly acknowledge which recommendations he
accountability. “Clericalism, whether fostered by
sign confidentiality agreements, which meant that agrees to implement.
priests themselves or by lay persons, leads to an
excision in the ecclesial body that supports and their stories were not made public. When abusers’
names are made public, other victims feel able to Conclusion
helps to perpetuate many of the evils that we are
condemning today. To say ‘no’ to abuse is to say come forward. Thus, there are still people in this As individuals, we are each grateful for the
an emphatic ‘no’ to all forms of clericalism” Pope Archdiocese who continue to suffer in silence, opportunity to have served on this Committee
Francis wrote (Letter to the People of God, August keeping unhealthy secrets to themselves, living in and to be active participants in this important
20, 2018). “On Holy Thursday 2019, Pope shame that is not theirs to hold, believing they are work. We recognize and acknowledge that there is
Francis in his homily named “the beginning of alone and believing they are the only ones who much hard work ahead, but we also attest to the
clericalism” as the action of the apostles, sending have suffered such violation and degradation at willingness and the steps that have already been
the crowds away instead of letting Jesus be with the hands of a particular priest. This has to stop, undertaken by this Archdiocese to improve safety
those who were looking for him, wanting to hear and this has to stop now. As a Church, we have to and care.
and follow him.” acknowledge these grave failings and we have to It is the hope of this Review Committee that
As the Committee discussed the case scenarios, rectify this. its recommendations will lead to concrete changes.
a number of topics arose which call into question To this end, the Committee outlines Archbishop Miller in his Interim Letter on Clergy
the integrity of the institution of the Catholic recommendations (Archdiocesan Clerical Sexual Abuse (February 20, 2019) spoke of “bold” new
Church such as (but not limited to): Abuse Case Review Committee, Document I: initiatives to “improve care for victims” and to
Letter of Recommendations), but in the first make “training and preventative systems stronger”
• Clericalism instance the Committee proposes as an absolute that will result from this work as the Archdiocese
• Hierarchicalism imperative that the Archdiocese of Vancouver of Vancouver and its leadership dedicates itself to
• The exclusion of women in Church publish a listing of clergy who have been guilty the care and protection of all God’s children.
leadership of sexual abuse. The Committee recommends We look forward to the Archbishop of
• Breaches of celibacy (regardless of sexual that the listing consist of convicted, admitted, Vancouver “taking bold steps to ensure that
orientation) and credibly accused clergy – of both diocesan abusive clergy members are held accountable
• Emotional well-being of priests and religious priests who served or resided in the for the terrible crimes they have committed”
• Denial of abuse within the Church Archdiocese; including photos and detailing places and that “greater transparency will invite more
• Protection of the good name of priests over where such clergy have lived and worked. input for change and will foster greater trust in
the protection of children Privacy laws which restrict publication should the faithful members of our clergy and religious
• How the shortage of priests affects the be consulted but the Committee urges that communities.”
choosing of future priests publication take place to the maximum allowed. We trust that our work, reflections, and
• Placement of priests Additionally, where there is knowledge of abuse recommendations will contribute to the concrete
• The lack of appropriate care or outreach for by one priest in a parish or school, the Archdiocese and radical change which we have all agreed is so
the victims of abuse, etc. must reach out to those communities to see if the urgently required.
All focused on the healing of the victim, the abuse was, in fact, more widespread. History and
community and the offender. the testimonies of victim-survivors tell us that very July 13, 2019
The Committee also discussed what to do with few, if any, incidences of predatory behaviors of a Archdiocesan Clerical Sexual Abuse Case
abusers, the influence of insurance companies, sexual nature ever stand alone. Review Committee
S-4 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE NOVEMBER 25, 2019

List of 31 recommendations

To Most Reverend J. Michael Miller, CSB, Archbishop of Vancouver,

In the fall of 2018, you appointed us, the Case Review of abuse. The focus of the recommendations is care for
Committee (“the Committee”) to conduct a review victims, families and the community, as well as effective
of historical cases involving the abuse of children and intervention for perpetrators. All the recommendations
vulnerable adults by clergy ministering in the Archdiocese work toward achieving a just and transparent process for
and to assess the effectiveness of the Archdiocese of all members of the Church community, culminating in the
Vancouver’s historical practices and procedures in this essential step of making the names of abusers known to the
context; in addition, we were to identify gaps and make community (Recommendation #7).
recommendations for improvement to the policies and We acknowledge there are privacy concerns which need
procedures regarding sexual abuse by clergy (the mandate to be addressed prior to publishing names; steps should be
of the Committee). taken to address these concerns.
Many concerns came to light in the Committee’s review It is essential that the Archdiocese of Vancouver take
of historical cases of abuse and how they were addressed — concrete steps toward creating a more approachable and
too many to highlight here. We have narrowed our most transparent process to receive allegations of sexual abuse,
important recommendations down and categorized them investigate them, be present to the victims, hold the
as follows: abusers accountable, and care for all those hurt. Thus, the
following should be established:
A. The Process of Reporting in the Archdiocese of • An Intake Office to oversee the process of
Vancouver receiving allegations and provide victim assistance
B. When a Cleric is Convicted or Found to be Credibly (Recommendation #1). This Intake Office should
Accused in the Archdiocese of Vancouver be independent of the Archdiocese and function at
C. Policies and Training in the Archdiocese of “arms reach’ similar to an Ombuds Office; and
Vancouver • A Review Board to evaluate every allegation of
D. Outreach and Healing in the Archdiocese of sexual abuse and make a determination of whether
Vancouver an allegation is creditable and the next steps to
E. The Church in Canada. follow. This Review Board should also be tasked with
the ongoing monitoring of abusers in cases where
These recommendations are aimed toward improving abuse is proven or credible. This should replace
systems in place to protect all from future abuse and the current Archdiocesan Advisory Committee on
toward bringing justice and closure in historical cases Clerical Sexual Misconduct (Recommendation #2).

Members of the Case Review Committee

Gerry Ayotte Kenneth Beatch Nancy Brown Raphael Donnelly Gary Franken Sharon Goh Lawrence Ho*
*No picture available

Bernadette Howell Leona Huggins Brenda Knight Mary Margaret Terry McLaughlin Lynda Robitaille
MacKinnon
(Committee Chair)
NOVEMBER 25, 2019 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE S-5

List of 31 recommendations
A The Process of Reporting in the Archdiocese of Vancouver Legend
Recommendation accepted in full.
1 The Archdiocese of Vancouver should establish an “Intake Office” for complaints Recommendation requires further planning or
staffed by individuals specifically trained to deal with the complexities of clergy sexual collaboration with other groups.
abuse. Staff should include lay women and men versed in trauma-informed practice.
Responsibilities should include:
• Receiving allegations of misconduct on behalf of the Archdiocese (the Committee
notes especially that the first point of contact should not be a cleric);
RCAV response
• Having staff that are professionally trained (trauma-informed) to receive allegations
and conduct detailed compassionate enquiry
1. An Office of Victim/Survivor Support will
• Documenting all information and communication regarding every allegation in
be established by the end of the first quarter of
writing;
2020. It will be staffed by on-call professionals with
• Reporting all claims to the police immediately in cases of child sexual abuse,
certification as psychologists, registered clinical
whether historic or not - this should not be the responsibility of the victim, although
counsellors or registered social workers, and not by
the victim may well wish to take part in this;
Archdiocesan employees.
• Ensuring that every allegation is sent in a timely manner to the “Review Board” for
2. The existing Advisory Committee on Clerical
evaluation;
Sexual Misconduct consists of three priests, a lawyer,
• Protecting and supporting whistleblowers throughout the process;
a psychologist, a nurse and a registered clinical
• Appointing an independent resource person to assist and support victims through
counsellor — two laymen and three laywomen.
the process.
A priest currently chairs the group. Qualified
• Liaising with the select group of trauma-informed clerics should the survivors need
individuals, both women and men, with relevant
or desire to speak to a cleric at this juncture. (see Training and Policies C:18)
experience have been part of the Advisory Committee
2 since it was established in 1994. The revised Policy
An Archdiocesan “Review Board” should be established to determine whether an
on Sexual Misconduct by Clergy to which the
allegation is credible. This “Review Board” should replace the current Archdiocesan
Archdiocese now commits (see recommendation
Advisory Committee on Clerical Sexual Misconduct and membership should consist
12) will formally require a majority of lay people,
– as much as possible – of:
and individuals with diverse, relevant backgrounds.
• A majority of lay people and chaired by a lay person
It will also provide for a lay chair and at least one
• Qualified individuals with relevant experience
non-Catholic member.
• Individuals of mixed gender and
• Of diverse ethnic, professional and religious backgrounds. 3. Melissa Godbout has been appointed as
Members of this “Review Board” should be willing to have their names made public if communications spokesperson who will speak publicly
requested along with brief descriptions of who they are. about issues related to sexual abuse and other concerns
facing the Church. She will work together with the
Responsibilities of this “Review Board” should include:
existing Archdiocesan communications team, which
will also seek new ways to provide victims with the
• Evaluating all complaints related to sexual misconduct that come to the opportunity to share their stories, if they wish.
Archdiocese;
• Conducting the process involved in any allegations of clergy abuse of a minor 4. In conjunction with members of the Office of
or adult, based on principles of accountability, transparency, fairness and timely Victim/Survivor Support, the Archdiocese will offer
communication; the support of counsellors and lay advocates for any
• Advising the Archbishop on ministry appointments; and victims who come forward. Advocates will be trained
• Providing victims with the opportunity to present their allegation to the Review by qualified trauma specialists to provide support for
Board. the victim during each stage of the process.
• Monitoring clerics who have been removed from active ministry to ensure that
they are adhering to their particular precepts (i.e. not celebrating public ministry, 5. All sexual abuse procedures and policies of the
dressing as a cleric, being in the presence of minors, etc.). Archdiocese are being revamped. As an immediate
action we have established an anonymous reporting
3 At least one staff member should be skilled (both in public relations and in dealing system was established in September 2019, and people
with matters related to sexual abuse) to speak publicly on behalf of the Archdiocese with information can report details to (604) 683-0281
regarding any cases of alleged or proven sexual abuse. extension 50555. Anonymity is assured for initial
reports.
4 Ensure that an independent resource person has been appointed to assist victims
of sexual abuse. This person should assist with reporting, communication with all
parties involved and the ongoing process.

5 Policies and procedures should be established to protect and encourage

individuals who come forward with information.
S-6 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE NOVEMBER 25, 2019

6 6. As of August 2019, all files relating to

All files relating to sexual abuse should be kept in one central storage at the
sexual abuse and misconduct are now stored in one
Archdiocese of Vancouver with the oversight of an independent person/
centralized place. The Chair of the reconstituted
Ombudsperson. There should be one central registry where a complete set of
Advisory Committee on Clerical Sexual Misconduct,
information is kept on each cleric, whether Archdiocesan, from another diocese or
who will be a lay person, will have full access to all
religious order.
such files.

B When a Cleric is Convicted or Found to be Credibly Accused in the 7. The names of all priests who have criminal
Archdiocese of Vancouver convictions, lawsuits settled, or other public cases
are included in this report (see page 11). We are
7Subject to the requirements of existing privacy legislation, names of clerics who working with experts from across the country to find
have served or resided here and are guilty of sexual abuse of minors or vulnerable legal means to share information regarding clergy
adults – whether Archdiocesan, from another diocese or religious order – should be who have not been convicted, but of whose guilt
publicized. This should include: we are morally certain. Due to Canadian legislation
• Those convicted in criminal, civil, or canonical trials; on privacy, we are more restricted than American
• Those who have admitted to committing the abuse; and dioceses, which have been able to publish the names
• Those who have been found to be credibly accused by the “Review Board.” of what have been called “credibly accused” priests.
(See interview, page 10.)
This publication should be made through communications to the parishes and/or
schools involved, the Archdiocesan website and other venues to reach those who are 8. Two known “remembrances” were removed
not practicing the Catholic faith. Information that should be published includes: in the summer of 2019. If any such cases are made
• The cleric’s full name and all names he has been known by, his date and place of known in the future, announcements will be made,
birth and ordination; “remembrances” will be removed, and pastoral
• A timeline, including dates and places of the cleric’s current and previous support will be provided to the affected community.
assignments;
• A brief summary of the type of abuse where possible;
9. We now prohibit public celebration of such
priests.
• Photos of the cleric;
• The number of known victims, their gender, and whether they were minors or
10. A social worker or professional counsellor
adults; and
will be retained to perform this review in the second
• Terms of any judgement on the cleric (including restrictions on ability to minister,
quarter of 2020.
wear clerical garb, etc.).
11. Any priest who fathers a child will be
8Should any offenders have been publicly recognized by a plaque, award, removed from active ministry and will be strongly
scholarship, etc. in their name, the truth of their “mixed legacy” should be made public encouraged to petition for laicization. Current
or the plaque, award, etc. should be removed. Any remembrances of convicted clerics Church law does not permit a local policy of
should include a notation that discloses this “mixed legacy.” involuntary laicization in such cases.
9Any clerics under investigation or found guilty of misconduct should not be 12. The Archdiocese’s Policy on Sexual
publicly celebrated (i.e. photos and stories should not be published in The B.C. Catholic Misconduct by Clergy was updated in 2018 and
newspaper, on or through the Archdiocesan website, or on any Archdiocesan social can be found at rcav.org/smc. The Archdiocese is
media accounts). now working on a new policy that will integrate the
recommendations contained in this report and in
10A review should take place of the Archdiocesan files of all living and deceased the document Protecting Minors from Sexual Abuse
clerics who were incardinated in or ministered in the Archdiocese of Vancouver. This issued by the Canadian Conference of Catholic
review should be done by a qualified third party (i.e. not a cleric or Archdiocesan staff Bishops (see story, page 9).
member) who should be given a standard of ethics and a primer of what to look for.
13. The scrutiny of clerics and consecrated
11
Priests with children should be removed from active ministry and laicized where women and men seeking to minister in the
possible. Archdiocese has been intensified. It now includes a
declaration from the bishop or major superior that
the complete file has been reviewed with care against
C Policies and Training in the Archdiocese of Vancouver a lengthy list of potential problems. Present policy
requires all priests ministering in the Archdiocese,
12
All Archdiocesan policies and procedures, including but not limited to the Policy except those on brief, temporary visits, to take
on Sexual Misconduct by Clergy, should be revised to reflect these recommendations formal Safe Environment Training to ensure their
as well as to reflect the guidelines and suggestions from the CCCB’s document, understanding of our policies for the protection of
Protecting Minors from Sexual Abuse (2018). children and vulnerable adults. Priests from other
cultures also take part in enculturation programs.
13
A cleric wishing to minister in the Archdiocese of Vancouver must agree to a
thorough review of that cleric’s complete file by the Archdiocese of Vancouver to be
accepted for ministry in the Archdiocese. Merely the word of the cleric’s bishop or
general superior attesting that he is ready for ministry in another diocese is not sufficient.
NOVEMBER 25, 2019 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE S-7

14 14. The Archdiocese established its Safe

The whole Church community should be well-trained in Safe Environment, aware
Environment Office in January 2010. Safety
of what is considered inappropriate or suspicious behavior, able to communicate when
and boundaries training has been provided to
another is crossing the boundaries, and aware of their duty to report inappropriate or
Archdiocesan parish staff and volunteers who
suspicious behavior. This includes all employees and volunteers at Catholic institutions
worked directly with minors and vulnerable adults.
(i.e. parish secretaries, housekeepers, maintenance, etc.), chaperones on excursions,
This training program will be extended to include all
and all children, parents and family members. Safe Environment training should be
Archdiocesan and parish employees and volunteers,
regular and ongoing.
regardless of whom they are working with.
15 All clerics – whether incardinated in the Archdiocese or in ministry in the 15. The Archdiocese will identify and
Archdiocese – should undergo an annual, formal performance review process, similar implement a suitable formal performance process by
to the process that permanent deacons currently undertake. This review should be the fourth quarter of 2020.
done by a group of people, including lay men and women.
16. This recommendation will be incorporated
16 In any allegation of sexual misconduct involving a cleric and an adult, the in the revised Policy on Sexual Misconduct by
allegation must be sent to the Review Board. Clergy (see recommendation 12), which will require
that all such allegations be sent for review pursuant
17 All clerics resident in the Archdiocese should receive regular training to ensure to the new policy review.
that they are aware of their civil and canonical obligations and the protocol to report
misconduct in all cases. 17. Every priest is required to acknowledge,
in writing, receipt of the Archdiocesan Policy on
18 A select group of trauma-informed clerics should be chosen to hear from Sexual Misconduct and to sign a Code of Pastoral
survivors and to be a support should the survivors need or desire this. Clerics should Conduct. These documents must be signed and
also be trained in self-awareness to recognize if, at any time, they are not the right training be completed before priests new to the
person for that role.
Archdiocese may begin work. All priests are required
to participate annually in online training. (A copy of
19 A full study should be undertaken of the current seminary training and formation,
the code may be seen at rcav.org/ppc.) Our response
to this recommendation reflects a commitment to
including but not limited to the application process and actual location of Christ the
continue and augment the existing process.
King Seminary. A committee of qualified professionals – lay and clergy alike – should
be established to advise on modifications to the screening, training and spiritual
18. The Archbishop is calling a convocation for
formation.
all clergy in the spring of 2020 to review this report
20 and related issues. Part of this process will involve
Clerics and seminarians should receive training with regard to appropriate selecting a group of clergy and lay people to receive
boundaries and skills in situations where they are required to offer spiritual and additional training in this area.
pastoral counsel. They should also be trained and equipped to make referrals to other
suitable individuals when they themselves do not have the necessary qualifications. 19. The Archdiocese will work closely
Only those with professionally accredited training should be considered Counselors with the Seminary leadership to implement this
and/or Spiritual Directors. recommendation. An ad hoc committee will be
established to accomplish this end.
D Outreach and Healing in the Archdiocese of Vancouver
20. The Archdiocese will work closely
21 The Archdiocese of Vancouver should offer outreach to victims who have not yet with the Seminary leadership to implement this
come forward by naming abusers and/or identifying locations where abuse may have recommendation. The Archdiocese will not permit
taken place. Outreach should not be limited to the practicing Catholic community, so anyone, cleric or lay, to advertise himself or herself
victims who have not come forward and who are estranged from the Church might in Archdiocesan communications media as a
learn of the allegations. Counsellor or Spiritual Director without proof of
formal accreditation.
22 Where the cleric 1) has taken responsibility for sexual abuse or harassment,
21. This report contains the names of all priests
2) has demonstrated remorse and 3) accepts the consequences of his actions, the
who have criminal convictions, lawsuits settled, or
Archdiocese of Vancouver should set up a process modeled after Circles of Support
other public cases (see page 11). Representatives
and Accountability (CoSA) for offending clerics. Participation should not be
of the Archdiocese will be available to visit
obligatory. Nor does participation influence a return to ministry.
parishes where these men lived in order to provide
information and support to the community. These
visits will commence in early 2020. This report is
being offered to secular and Christian media as part
of a continuing effort to reach victims.

22. The Archdiocese will invite priests

described in this recommendation to participate in
the process suggested.
S-8 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE NOVEMBER 25, 2019

23. Several parishes have held listening sessions

23
The Archdiocese should host ongoing listening sessions/circles or open
and opportunities for victims/survivors to share
their stories. The Archdiocese is planning to do the
microphone sessions in the presence of trained trauma counsellors at parishes to
same in early 2020 and will work with victims/
encourage the disclosure of abuse. Such sessions/circles should be hosted at
survivors’ groups and experts in the field to ensure
minimum once a year.
events are safe and effective.
24
“Liturgies of Healing and Reconciliation” should be designed (with input from 24. Several prayer services and opportunities
victim-survivors) and offered in parishes and at the Archdiocesan level. These could be for praying with and for victims/survivors will be
held on All Survivors’ Day, November 3rd. held in 2020.
25There should be a systematic Archdiocesan plan developed and put in place for 25. The Archbishop will refer this specific
educating clergy and laity alike on the inherent evil of clericalism, and the degree to recommendation to the Archdiocesan Pastoral
which it has been normalized within the Catholic experience. A strategy for developing Council, which is composed of a majority of lay
and maintaining a Church which more fully reflects the spirit of Vatican II (Lumen people, to explore prayerfully the development and
Gentium and Apostolicam Actuositatem, for example) should be developed and implementation of an Archdiocesan plan. At least
implemented. Accordingly, we recommend the immediate establishment of a one member of the Case Review Committee will be
leadership team, comprised of lay, religious and clergy to prayerfully explore the named to the Pastoral Council to facilitate this.
development and implementation of an Archdiocesan-wide plan. We further
recommend that the plan have a threefold focus on 1) individual, 2) communal and 3) 26. The Archdiocese continues to create more
institutional conversion. opportunities for women to play critical roles in core
aspects of the Church’s mission and administration.
26
The Archdiocese of Vancouver should set a pro-active example by inviting and
27. The Archbishop is writing to the General
supporting increasing numbers of women in leadership roles. An “affirmative action”
Secretary of the Canadian Conference of Catholic
principle might be considered to expedite this.
Bishops to relay this recommendation.

E The Church in Canada 28. The Archbishop is writing to the General

Secretary of the Canadian Conference of Catholic
27
The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) is encouraged to establish a Bishops to relay this recommendation.
National Review Board on sexual abuse. This Board should oversee a Safe Environment
protocol throughout all the dioceses and religious orders in Canada and hold bishops
29. Letters were written on Aug. 16, 2019.
accountable for responding to sexual abuse. 30. The recommendation is accepted and will
28 be undertaken in the first quarter of 2020.
A nationwide electronic registry of credible allegations of clerical sexual abuse
should be established and maintained which would allow information to be shared 31. Three members of the Case Review
among dioceses and religious orders. The Archbishop of Vancouver is encouraged to Committee joined with Archdiocesan staff to form
be a leader in this initiative. the Implementation Working Group (IWG), which
started meeting in September 2019. Changes
29
The Archbishop of Vancouver should contact all religious superiors or diocesan committed to in this report will be implemented
bishops of clerics ministering or who have ministered here to inform them of the and monitored by the IWG which will report to the
process that has been and is currently being undertaken and to request that they share Archbishop on a semi-annual basis. These reports
all names and files of members who have committed sexual misconduct. will be made public.

30The Archdiocese of Vancouver should also commit to sharing all information it has
in its files regarding clerics who have been accused of sexual misconduct with their
orders or dioceses.

31The Archdiocese of Vancouver should have a group to meet quarterly whose

responsibility it is to review and report on Archdiocesan progress in responding to the
abuse crisis. These reports should be made public. For the sake of continuity,
membership of that committee should include (but not be limited to) some
representatives of this Clerical Sexual Abuse Case Review Committee. Changes
committed to in this report will be implemented and monitored by the IWG which
will report to the Archbishop and other leaders on a semi-annual basis. These reports
will be made public. Members of the Implementation
Working Group (IWG)
• James Borkowski
• Sister Nancy Brown, SC(H)
• Barb Dowding (Vice Chair)
• Father Gary Franken (Chair)
• Deacon Bruce Fraser
• Sharon Goh
• Makani Marquis
NOVEMBER 25, 2019 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE S-9

Moving ahead — with sorrow but determination

T
wo independent, non- Board. Brown has been a director pastoral letter, the recommendations of the Case
Catholic lawyers will on the board of numerous non- Review Committee presented an opportunity for
be taking over the profits including the Stephen “a firm commitment to take concrete and effective
investigation process for any future Lewis Foundation. She is action marked by greater transparency in all that
reports of sexual abuse by clergy in married with two adult children. we do.”
the Archdiocese of Vancouver. Pickering, who also grew up Credit for the hard work that has occurred
As well, they have been asked in Vancouver, was called to the to date, goes to the Implementation Working
to examine the files of priests who B.C. Bar in 1986. She moved Group, listed on page 8. (To provide continuity,
have been the subject of historic with her husband in the 1990s three people from this group were members
complaints. Their job will be to to Cranbrook, B.C., of the original Case Review
review and collect evidence to where they raised Committee.)
determine whether it is appropriate Cleta Brown their three sons. The group has met regularly,
to publish their names on the There, she worked for several hours each time,
Archdiocesan website as people who as a sole practitioner to provide a detailed and
were involved in sexual crimes against children. doing contract work and locums meaningful reaction that will
The primary investigator will be veteran while her children were young. help transform the face of our
Vancouver lawyer Cleta Brown. Whenever she is After they had grown, she joined a support and recognition for
unable to fulfill those responsibilities, or requires law firm in Cranbrook as a contract victims and survivors.
extra assistance, she will be replaced or aided by lawyer. She and her husband Once the 31
another veteran lawyer, Mary Pickering. currently live on Salt Spring Island. recommendations have been
Brown is an independent investigator and The two lawyers will be implemented to the best of
Mary Pickering
retired lawyer who received her legal education remunerated by the Church but the Archdiocese’s ability, there
at the University of Victoria and the London in every other respect will function will be further study of the 69
School of Economics. Her career includes working without direction from the Church. They will recommendations from the Canadian Conference
as an Investigator and General Counsel to the hold office by virtue of a written agreement with of Catholic Bishops.
Ombudsman of British Columbia; as a Crown the Archdiocese.
Counsel and as a Vice Chair of the BC Review As Archbishop Miller says in his Nov. 21

Canadian bishops stand by strong statement on sexual abuse

T
he Catholic Church in Canada is boundaries to ensure that Church leaders may include a multidisciplinary selection
addressing its history of sexual abuse are apprised of the necessary information committee. (#49)
in a meaningful and concrete way that to make prudent decisions about pastoral • Cease requiring confidentiality clauses in
works to turn victims/survivors into teachers. work assigned to clergy, religious, and lay settlements of cases of sexual abuse and to
This effort may be seen in a pivotal document associates who are being transferred, with waive those given in the past (#58)
titled Protecting Minors from Sexual Abuse similar procedures applying to seminarians • Establish practices where clergy, religious,
and published by the Canadian Conference and religious. (#10) and laity can be mutually accountable to
of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) in 2018. In the • Keep the community informed in a timely each other for their actions and attitudes.
document’s foreword Bishop Ronald Fabbro, manner of developments during the (#68)
of London, Ont. writes: “[It is] important for preliminary investigation while observing Vancouver Archbishop Michael Miller has
survivors to drive the process.” the obligations of due process and hailed the CCCB document as a “valuable tool
In what he describes as an historical “culture of confidentiality. (#20) for our local Church as we move ahead in
disbelief,” he argues that survivors have essentially • Respond with transparency to appropriate supporting victims and strengthening policies
suffered twice. “First by the abuse itself, and then requests for information about an offender and procedures to protect both the young and
by the refusal of others to believe them.” (#24) vulnerable adults.”
The CCCB has published 69 recommendations • Submit all policies, protocols, and practices Archbishop Miller said that implementing the
it hopes will recognize and better support victims/ to third-party auditing at least once every recommendations of the Case Review Committee
survivors. four years (#29) he established for the Archdiocese of Vancouver
Here are selected highlights from the advice • Acknowledge and address the spiritual and is his first priority, but that each of the proposals
for bishops on how to create a safe and healing emotional impact of the sexual abuse crisis from the national document will be studied before
community: on the vitality of the Church, helping clergy new policies are final.
• Ensure that victims coming forward for the and laity to overcome their shame, confront Anyone who wishes to read the entire
first time are received in a non-judgmental negative images and stereotypes, and CCCB document can find it here: https://rcav.
pastoral encounter where they are welcomed ultimately serve with joy and serenity. (#35) org/cccb-pm The recommendations are contained
and commended for their courage. (#1) • Implement adequate procedures for in an appendix beginning on page 132.
• Improve communication across diocesan screening candidates for ministry, which
S-10 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE NOVEMBER 25, 2019

Legal issues with the publishing of names

For a clear explanation of how the Archdiocese of Vancouver is addressing requests to publish the
names of all priests considered “probably guilty” of sexual abuse or assault, the Archdiocese (RCAV)
interviewed lawyer and Case Review Committee chair Mary Margaret MacKinnon (MMM).
RCAV: The terrible revelations of alleged to have occurred, to see if there are
sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, other people who have been affected. Keep
in places like Boston, New York and in mind that we can also publish factual
Philadelphia, have led to the term findings — for example, that somebody
“credibly accused” becoming widely has been removed from ministry. I think
published. What does that phrase this ultimately might give us a good way of
mean? moving forward.
MMM: The term is not used by lawyers.
RCAV: Moving on, how would you describe
In Canada we talk about the burden
Vancouver’s performance with respect to
of proof in criminal and civil cases.
clerical sexual abuse over the last 40 or 50
In criminal cases the offence must be
years?
established beyond a reasonable doubt.
In civil cases it must be shown to be MMM: I think evolutionary. We didn’t have
more likely true than not, or 51%. The the volume of claims that you would see in
American definition used in various some of these other jurisdictions, and we
American policies appears to equate to the certainly didn’t have the shuffling of priests
civil burden here. between postings when abuse was noted.
There’s one case that I am aware of, dating
RCAV: And so, briefly, how would you back to the ’50s and ’60s, where there were
summarize the legal difference between complaints received about a priest and he
privacy in Canada and the U.S.? Mary Margaret MacKinnon was moved from parish to parish with some
restrictions placed on him. But the rigours
MMM: There are two distinctions to keep RCAV: What will be the next specific steps to of the analysis that have been in place since
in mind. In the United States — and you’ll see take in terms of publicizing the names of priests the mid-1980s have taken a lot of the discretion
this if you watch American court dramas — they who have probably assaulted or abused people? out of the hands of priests and put them before a
take freedom of speech, to a level of protection
MMM: If information is in the public domain, we committee.
unknown in Canada. So, that’s the first pillar that
distinguishes us from the Americans. The second can release it, and we have done so today. People
who are “credibly accused,” according to U.S. RCAV: A committee involving lay people?
is that we have 10 provinces and three territories,
all of which have their own privacy legislation. In language, or “probably guilty” in Canadian terms, MMM: Yes, that’s right. Since the policy on clerical
B.C. it’s called PIPA, which stands for Personal are going to be much more challenging to deal abuse was enacted, here and in other jurisdictions,
Information and Protection Act, and the same with. As well, it’s very difficult to look at older there have been sexual abuse advisory committees
legislation is in place all across Canada. The documents, which are often paltry, and get any made up of usually judges, ex-judges, RCMP
defamation laws in Canada and the U.S. are also understanding about what occurred. So, doing members, psychologists, sociologists, some priests,
applied differently. that kind of an analysis historically is problematic. some educators, some parents. The one missing
Going forward it’s much more straightforward. point, I think, has been the absence of victims or
RCAV: You’re saying that in the U.S. they’ve survivors on those committees, and that is one of
been able to list the names of priests that they RCAV: Essentially what you’re saying is that — the recommendations of our report. The voice of
call “credibly accused,” whereas in Canada, eventually — we will be able to publish this survivors is very powerful, and we need to hear
we’re not able to list the names of priests we information? from them moving forward.
consider “probably guilty”? MMM: I hope so. There are currently discussions
going on across Canada among numerous Church RCAV: Is there anything else you want to add
MMM: We have to figure out a way to balance our
bodies to find out ways we can do that. that we haven’t yet talked about today?
legal obligations with the public’s desire to know.
A lot of study and discussion is taking place right MMM: I think the idea that people in the Church
now to see how we can make this happen. RCAV: How soon do you think this will happen? don’t want to talk about these issues is an old,
MMM: I don’t know. A number of groups are outdated perception. People in the Church want
RCAV: How is it that websites like the Survivors working hard to put more information into the to reach out and make human connections with
Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) are hands of the public. There are ongoing discussions people who’ve been hurt by our system. Our
able to publish names of the probably guilty? about setting up administrative tribunals to make committee felt very strongly that the Archbishop
determinations about probable wrongdoing, and was listening to us. We have to change if we’re
MMM: They are not an employer of these priests to
what level of publication of that information will going to be the Church that we want to be, and
begin with, so the PIPA legislation doesn’t apply to
be possible in Canada. Meanwhile, we should be that’s a humble Church that reaches out to people
them.
able to disclose the names in a limited fashion, who have been injured.
perhaps in the parish where that offence has
NOVEMBER 25, 2019 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE S-11

Criminal convictions, lawsuits settled, and other public cases

T
he Archdiocese of Vancouver Two factors must be considered before For this reason, the Archdiocese is turning
understands the importance of ensuring publication of names. The first is whether over its file of cases to two new independent,
that information about sexual abuse of the reported allegations are true. The second non-Catholic investigators (see story, page 9) so
minors is available to the community. The Case is whether there are legal constraints to they can review the evidence and determine how
Review Committee determined that some 26 publication. (See story page 10). In its work, the claims may be further pursued. Today we are
such assaults likely occurred in Vancouver over the Case Review Committee discovered that publishing information we are legally allowed
the last 70 years. many of the remaining allegations had not been to share. We will publish more as soon as we are
Some 10 additional cases involved consensual investigated to a currently acceptable standard. able. A complete list of the assignments of each
adult relationships where, of course, the In fact, two of the allegations were against priest named below will soon be included on the
imbalance of power made them likely to be “unnamed priests” because the victims/survivors RCAV website.
abusive. could not remember the names.
CRIMINALLY CONVICTED LAWSUITS SETTLED
Paul J. Blancard (born 1940) Lawrence Edward (Damian) Cooper (born 1958)
RCMP investigated Blancard regarding an incident in Burnaby He admitted to having a relationship with a young woman
in 1967 or 1968 involving a sexual assault of a girl, aged six or whom he met as a seminarian at Camp Latona in 1985 when
seven, in St. Helen’s Parish. No charges were laid. Two more she was 15. Their relationship became sexual several years later,
allegations dating to the time of ministry there, were received by which point he was a priest. The victim/survivor reported
by police in 2016. A complaint, regarding his time in the the relationship to the Archdiocese in 1994. Just prior to
Diocese of Victoria, was made to the RCMP in 1990. Charges receiving the accusation, the Archdiocese had permitted him
were laid in 1992 and Blancard was convicted and sentenced to transfer to the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon for family
to one year in prison. He has not been active in the priesthood reasons. When Vancouver learned of the matter, he was sent for
since that time. residential psychological treatment. In 1995, he obtained an
assignment in the Diocese of Rockville Centre, NY, but was later accused of having
George Gordon (born 1915, died 2000) a sexual relationship with an adult there and ceased ministry. When he contacted
He was charged with regard to abuse of three boys that took the Archdiocese of Vancouver in 2002 to seek priestly ministry here, he was refused
place in the 1950s at Holy Rosary Cathedral. Although abusive and is no longer in priestly ministry. In 2012, the Vancouver victim/survivor
behaviour was reported in some fashion to the Archdiocese at launched a civil lawsuit against Cooper, which was settled out of court.
the time and again in 1967, he remained in ministry until two
of the victims reported the crimes to the Archdiocese and police Antero Sarmiento (born 1931, died 2019)
in 1989. (At the time, he acknowledged the existence of other Complaints of inappropriate behavior were made to the
victims.) Gordon was convicted in 1992 and sentenced to six Archdiocese in 1980, at which time Sarmiento returned
months in jail. Already retired from parish ministry by the time abruptly to the Archdiocese of Manila, which had allowed him
he was charged, he resided and said Mass in a convent. to work on loan to Vancouver since 1977. Police obtained an
arrest warrant on three charges of indecent assault in 2004, but
John McCann, OMI (born 1928, died 2018) he refused to return here for questioning by police despite the
He was charged and convicted in 1991 of six counts relating to Archbishop of Vancouver’s requests to his own bishop. Three
sex abuse of girls under the age of 16 in the 1970s. He served subsequent civil lawsuits by his victim/survivors were settled by
10 months in jail. The abuse occurred when he was serving at the Archdiocese in recent years.
St. Augustine’s Parish between 1972 and 1973, and St. Peter’s
in New Westminster between 1975 and 1990. The Archdiocese OTHER PUBLIC CASES
of Vancouver removed his faculties but, unknown to the
Archdiocese, he subsequently served as a priest on Salt Spring Edwin Budiman (born 1942)
Island in the Diocese of Victoria and in the Archdiocese of In 2007, he was charged with two criminal sexual offences involving minors. Both
Ottawa. charges were later stayed by the Crown but measures pursuant to the Church’s own
law (canon law) led first to his removal as pastor, then to restrictions on his ministry
Harold McIntee, OMI (born 1930, died 2016) and private life that were increased in April 2019, when he was strictly prohibited
Arrested in February 1989 and charged with multiple counts from all public ministry and counselling activities, and from wearing clerical dress
of sexual abuse. Many of his victims were boys in residential (e.g. the Roman collar).
schools in the dioceses of Kamloops, Prince George and
Victoria. When he was arrested, he worked in parishes in John Eason (born 1941)
Ucluelet and Tofino, in the Diocese of Victoria. He pled guilty He was convicted in 1995 of one count of indecent assault. The victim was a
and was sentenced to two years in jail plus three years probation woman of 21, and the assault took place in Powell River in 1980. The woman
for sex abuse of 17 boys in British Columbia over 25 years. reported to police in 1994 that he had touched her breast. He pled guilty and was
He lived in Vancouver and worked for a time as a chaplain at ordered to serve a 2½-year term of probation, during which he was required to
Youville Residence (a senior care facility), but no abuse was undergo counselling.
reported here.

Alfred Frank Louis Sasso (born 1934, died 1991)

A priest of the Diocese of London, Ontario, he pled guilty in IMPORTANT NOTE
1980 to three counts of gross indecency against three youths The Archdiocese has dealt with a number of cases that are not
which occurred in Ontario. He was convicted there and was
mentioned here. These courageous claimants who contacted the
sentenced to 3 months in jail. After serving his sentence and
receiving psychological treatment, he came to Vancouver, where Archdiocese were heard and believed. The fact that these cases are not
he worked at the Cathedral, St. Patrick’s Parish and Sts. Peter dealt with in this report does not mean they were unfounded. Each
and Paul parishes in Vancouver between 1981 and 1984, when file will be reviewed with care by the newly appointed independent
he left abruptly and returned to Ontario, where he later worked lawyer-investigators.
at a treatment facility for alcoholics.
S-12 REPORT ON CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE NOVEMBER 25, 2019

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1 Why has it taken the Catholic 5 How often were priests in 8 Are there any priests — who 11 Will the new victim services
Church so long to address the Vancouver shuffled rather than have not been charged or process be run by professionals
issue of sexual abuse by priests? removed from ministry? convicted but who are strongly trained in the area?
The Archdiocese of Vancouver and The only case we are aware of was more suspected of having abused Yes, the Office of Victim/Survivor Support
the Catholic Church in Canada have than 50 years ago. Vancouver has never
others, whether children or will be staffed by on-call professionals with
worked steadily over the last 30 years had a practice of shuffling priests. We
adults — who are currently certification as psychologists, registered
to develop and implement policies to are aware of one case in which it might
ministering in other dioceses? clinical counsellors, or registered social
protect children. That said, even one have appeared we shuffled the priest Not to our knowledge. workers.
case of abuse is too many. In Vancouver, (Father McCann, see page 11), but we
9 Once a priest has been 12 How can victims be assured
we recognize we have made mistakes in did not. We can refuse to allow priests
the past, and recent revelations about from religious orders to minister here, accused, what happens? that these promised changes will
the extent of the problem elsewhere but we have no authority to assign A priest who has been accused is take effect?
in the world have made us resolve to them or remove them from ministry placed on leave, and if the complaints The current response includes deadlines as
intensify our efforts to protect more elsewhere. In Father McCann’s case, involve children, police are notified a sign of the very serious commitment of
forcefully and to promote healing. The the Oblates allowed him to minister immediately. As well, complainants the Archbishop and all his co-workers.
work of the Case Review Committee has in Ontario, without alerting us. One are offered counselling by a qualified
been an excellent and inspiring first step. of the recommendations of the file third-party counsellor at the expense of
13 I am a victim who has never
review committee is to have Catholic the Archdiocese. Until now, the review reported. What can I do?
2 Why are the numbers so low jurisdictions in Canada work more closely of the accusations has been handled by As of the first quarter of 2020, a new,
in Vancouver compared to New together so this type of serious mistake a formal policy that can be seen online, third-party Office of Victim/Survivor
York, Philadelphia, and other doesn’t happen again. We unreservedly https://rcav.org/smc. That policy relied Support will be established. It will be
jurisdictions in the U.S.? accept this recommendation and will be on priests delegated by the Archbishop staffed by on-call professionals with
Every local diocese has its own history working to see it implemented. for the purpose of investigating certification as psychologists, registered
of leadership and some distinct local complaints, while the new policy will clinical counsellors or registered social
6 When was the most recent mandate lay persons to the task. If a
laws and values. As well, we are a smaller workers and complaints may be received
Archdiocese than many of our American case of sexual abuse by a priest in priest is found to have committed a 24/7. Until this office is established,
siblings. (New York has an estimated Vancouver? criminal offence, responsibility for the Archdiocese will continue to accept
2.6 million Catholics, Philadelphia, In the last 10 years, we have received pursuing charges lies with the public reports to any of the parties listed on our
1.4 million and Vancouver, 443,000.) approximately 12 complaints of sexual justice system. If he is charged and website, here: https://rcav.org/reporting.
It is also possible that some victims/ abuse. Some of these date back to the ’70s ultimately found guilty, he will either (There are separate contacts for abuse by
survivors may have been afraid to report. and ’80s. Three of these allegations were be removed from ministry or given clergy members and abuse by lay people.)
We want all victims/survivors to know not historical, however, but involved the strict restrictions. On the other hand, Note that there is at least one non-priest
there are policies in place to protect activities of priests who were currently In if his offence is not criminal in nature who can receive reports in each category.
them and if they wish to come forward ministry. These priests were immediately but has been damaging and hurtful, Also, as of September 2019, we established
they will be heard and treated with removed from ministry while the the independent investigator will an anonymous phone-based reporting
respect. allegations were investigated. Only one recommend to the Archbishop whether system where people can leave a message
has been allowed to return to ministry, the conduct merits removal from or on a voicemail line: (604) 683-0281
3 Did the Case Review once it was determined that his case did restriction in ministry. extension 50555. This line is checked
Committee look at everything? not involve sexual abuse. daily, and a policy is in place to ensure that
10 Do victims have to sign
Yes, they reviewed every file relating parties with information are protected.
7 What happens to the priests confidentiality agreements or are
to sexual misconduct. A second
who are removed from ministry? they prevented in any way from 14 Why was the abuse reported in
independent review of each and every
personnel file is now planned as well. Church law has changed in the past speaking openly if they wish to? the Truth and Reconciliation
(See recommendation #10, page 6.) decade to allow them to be much more The last time a confidentiality Commission not addressed by this
readily laicized or “defrocked.” In cases agreement was signed was in the committee?
4 Are there priests who have where that change is not possible, a priest early ’90s. We have not used them in The Truth and Reconciliation Commission
been found guilty of sexual removed from ministry can be given strict almost 30 years, and the Archdiocese did years of thorough collaborative
assault still working in ministry in restrictions (for example: no contact with has waived any agreements that were work. We did not want the Case Review
Vancouver? children, no access to social media, no previously signed. Committee to repeat work that had
No. right to wear clerical garb, no right to say already been done, nor did we wish to
Mass) in exchange for a modest pension. question the TRC findings. A summary
of that group’s final report may be found
here: https://rcav.org/trc.