Session3 P

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Session 3:

Process view of Operations


FedEx v. UPS
“…the optimal way to serve very distinct market segments, such as
express and ground, is to operate highly efficient, independent
networks with different facilities, different cut-off times and
different delivery commitments.”

“Our express air services are integrated with our vast ground
delivery system: one system handling all products. This integrated
air and ground network enhances pickup and delivery density and
provides us with the flexibility to transport packages using the most
efficient mode or combination of modes.”

Mieghem 2008
Linking Business Strategy and
Operations Strategy
The Swiss Watch Industry
Swiss Watch Industry
• 1970s - 50% of the watches Swiss make
• 1980s - share reduces to 15%
– Low cost of manufacturing from Japan, Hong Kong
– Quartz technology
– Mass production
– 500 million units
• $75 – 450 million units
• $450 – 42 million units
• Top segment – 8 million units (97% world wide share by
Swiss watches)
Framework: Swiss Watch Industry
• Competency view and competitive strategy:
– High-end quality and price;
- Quality (luxury, exclusivity, durability; in contrast to
reliability, precision)

• Resource view:
– Size: small capacity (1600 companies = cottage industry) +
contracting
– Type: manual, flexible, predominantly highly-skilled labor
(craftsmen)
– Location and network structure: dispersed, cottage industry
Framework: Swiss Watch Industry
• Process view:
– Sourcing & Customers: Not controlled/managed, not VI.
Buyer relationships: sell to fragmented small jewelers.
– Technology:
• Process: manual: cost = 60% labor, 20% materials, 20%
OH;
• Japan - Seiko: wages 1/10th, and labor reduced to 35%
through standardization & automation.
• Product: exterior (case, dial, hands) and interior
movement, which contains about 200 unique parts
driven by spring
• Japan – about 50 parts
How are firms organized from
Operations perspective?
Design of Process
Process Types
Process Examples Variety Volume
Job shop Construction, IPO, High Low
Formula 1 race car,
Software project,
Commercial printer,
R&D firm
Batch process Defense, pharma Moderate Moderate
Discrete parts mfg,
Semiconductors,
Apparel
Assembly line Auto assembly, Moderate High
Fast food like
McDonalds
Continuous flow Sugar, oil refinery, Low Very High
paper mill
Product-Process Matrix
Process Technology
(Flexibility)
Job Shop (High)
Jumbled flow C A
Process segments
nt
loosely linked
e ts)
ff ici yc
o s

In e unit
rt
Disconnected line flow
ppo
Jumbled flow but a o
dominant flow exists gh nt
(hi e
n m
Alig
Connected line flow o f
(e.g., assembly line) ne sts)
Zo t co
o cke
Continuous, automated, -o f-p
ib le
rigid line flow ou
t
e as
Process segments tightly
linked B ( high Inf D
Flow Shop (Low)
Standardized Products Customer Solutions Product
Commodity products Few Major Products Many Products One of a kind
High volume Low volume Concept
(Low) (High) (Variety)
Source: Mieghem 2008
Originally proposed by Hayes and Wheelwright
Service setting
Organizing processes
• Mass production • Customization
– Economies of scale (volume) – Variety
– PUSH control system – PULL control system
– Make- to –stock – Make- to- order
– Anticipation of demand – Higher lead time

Contemporary Operations: Outside the diagonal??


• Mass customization
– Both volume and variety
– Hybrid PUSH and PULL
– Standard part of process/product (PUSH)
– Differentiation part (PULL)

You might also like