Delayed Homicides and The Proximate Cause: Peter Lin, MD, and James R. Gill, MD
Delayed Homicides and The Proximate Cause: Peter Lin, MD, and James R. Gill, MD
Delayed Homicides and The Proximate Cause: Peter Lin, MD, and James R. Gill, MD
354 | www.amjforensicmedicine.com Am J Forensic Med Pathol • Volume 30, Number 4, December 2009
Am J Forensic Med Pathol • Volume 30, Number 4, December 2009 Delayed Homicides
TABLE 1. Proximate and Immediate Causes of Death TABLE 3. Paralysis Survival Intervals
Immediate Cause Ventilator Decubitus Survival Interval
Type of Paralysis Total Dependent Ulcers in Years (Mean)
Intestinal
Obstruction/ Paraplegia 14 0 13 (93%) 8.3–32 (20.3)
Proximate Cause Total Infection Seizure Hernia Other Quadriplegia 8 7 6 (75%) 1.8–31 (14.8)
Gunshot wound 27 19 3 2 3 Hypoxic-ischemic 7 4 2 (29%) 1.3–13.5 (7.4)
encephalopathy
Blunt injury 9 4 4 1 1
Hemiplegia 2 0 0 2–12.3 (7.1)
Sharp injury 6 0 0 4 1
No paralysis 11 0 0 1.3–43.2 (18.4)
Total 42 23 7 7 5
Total 42 11 21 1.3–43.2 (15.7)
injury that initiated the train of morbid events leading directly to It is important to note that a medical examiner/coroner’s
death or the circumstances of the accident or violence, which determination of homicide as a manner of death is not equivalent to
produced the vital injury. Their design of the new death certificate a determination of homicide by a judge or jury. Certification of the
included separate entries for the cause, manner, and circumstances manner of death by a medical examiner/coroner is primarily for vital
of death.7 From this similar terminology, it appears that the medi- health statistical purposes but also is used by insurance companies
colegal definition of the proximate cause of death had its origin in and other agencies for internal administrative purposes. The cause of
the legal definition of proximate cause. death certification may be more important in subsequent legal
In law, a proximate cause is an event sufficiently related to a proceedings because it requires the gathering of facts obtained
legally recognizable injury to be held the cause of that injury. The through a medicolegal investigation, including an autopsy, and the
legal use of proximate cause mainly is concerned with torts and the specialized knowledge to interpret those facts. In criminal trials, the
assignment of negligence; however, there are logical similarities manner of death is ultimately a question for the jury to answer.
with the use of proximate cause of death by the medicolegal field. Nonetheless, the certification of a homicide requires a higher
There are 2 types of causation in the law, cause-in-fact and proxi- degree of certainty (ie, a reasonable degree of medical certainty)
mate (or legal) cause. Cause-in-fact is determined by the “but-for” than natural deaths or accidents (a preponderance of the evidence).5
test: but for the action, the result would not have happened. For In deaths due to recent injury, it usually is not difficult to meet this
example, but for running the red light, the collision would not have higher standard since the mechanism of death (eg, exsanguination)
occurred. For an act to cause harm, both tests must be met; is clearly linked to the injury. When trauma kills so quickly that
proximate cause is a legal limitation on cause-in-fact. Since “but- there is no time for sequelae to develop, the injury is both the
for” causation is very easy to show and does not assign culpability immediate and proximate cause of death.8 In delayed deaths, there
(but for the snow, you would not have crashed your car), there is a typically is an interposing immediate cause. These immediate causes
second test used to determine whether an action is close enough to (bronchopneumonia, urosepsis) may result from natural diseases as
a harm in a “chain of events” to be a legally culpable cause of the well as consequences of injury. Therefore, in these delayed deaths,
harm. This test is the proximate cause. one must link the death to the immediate cause and link the
These tests of causality can be applied for death certification. immediate cause to the remote injury. Both links must be made to a
The critical task in certifying a death following a remote injury is to reasonable degree of medical certainty to certify the death as a
determine whether the remote injury represents the proximate (un- homicide. This higher standard may be difficult to meet in some
derlying) cause of death. A prototypical example is a wheelchair- instances of delayed death and typically requires a diligent review of
bound paraplegic (due to a remote gunshot wound of the spinal cord) available records and an autopsy (particularly if competing or
who dies from sepsis due to infected decubitus ulcers. In this contributing conditions unrelated to the remote injury are a concern).
example, there are at least 3 injuries that meet the “but for” The cause of death may be affected by the detection of other
test—-gunshot wound, paraplegia, and decubitus ulcers—-but only non–injury-related comorbidities. The incidence of life-threatening,
the gunshot wound meets the proximate cause test. The search for cardiovascular disease increases with increasing age. In our series,
the proximate cause ends with the determination of the etiologically 10 decedents were over 60 years of age and there were some deaths
specific disease or injury. in which coexisting natural disease made a contribution to the death.
Delayed Homicides and Immediate Causes The decision to include these contributing conditions depends upon
An antiquated English common law rule holds that a death a careful review of the circumstances and autopsy findings. The 3
must occur within a “year and a day” after an assault to be questions that arise with concurrent natural disease are: (1) is the
considered a homicide. This rule has occasionally been invoked as comorbidity to the extent that it is an efficient intervening cause of
a defense in jurisdictions where it had yet to be explicitly revoked death? (2) Did the comorbidity contribute to the death in conjunction
(see State of Wisconsin v. Picotte, 2003 WI 42). A US Supreme with the remote injury? (3) If so, was it a major or minor factor?
Court ruling in July 2001 affirmed a State Court’s abolishment of the Contrariwise, if the remote injury contributes at all to the death, then
rule (Rogers v. Tennessee, US 99 – 6218) stating that “advances in the injury will dominate the manner of death determination. For
medical and related science have so undermined the rule’s useful- example, one delayed homicide was certified as cardiac arrest due to
ness as to render it without question obsolete.” It also was abolished hypertensive disease (in part 1). This death occurred during emer-
in Great Britain with the Law Reform Act of 1996. The gradual gent surgery for an incarcerated incisional hernia due to a remote
extinction of the “year and a day rule” for bringing homicide charges repair of a stab wound, which was listed as a contributing condition
in delayed deaths, may result in more of these deaths proceeding to (part 2). The manner was certified as homicide.
trial. Medical examiners/coroners must be prepared to explain the There is a potential for obfuscation or confusion with the
reasoning behind these death certifications and maintain consistent immediate cause. Particularly in legal proceedings, a party may
standards for the certification of all delayed deaths due to any injury attempt to blame the death on the immediate cause, ignore the
(homicides, suicides, and accidents). proximate cause of death, or focus on comorbidities. In some
Medical examiner/coroners have no time limit for the interval instances, there may be an attempt to shift the blame to the care-
between an injury and death to invoke the injury as the proximate takers who did not “adequately” care for the patient. These diver-
cause. Therefore, the potentially long interval that may occur be- sions usually can be addressed by the simple fact that this person
tween a traumatic injury and death can complicate the cause of death would not have died at this time from this complication if the
determination. Common problems include the failure of care pro- original injury had not occurred. The patient would not have re-
viders to recognize and report deaths due to remote traumatic quired an indwelling urinary catheter or developed a decubitus ulcer
injuries, the difficulty in sorting out a complex sequence of events if there was no initial injury. It has been said that the constitution
interposed between the injury and death, and the lack of adequate does not guarantee an assailant the right to a healthy victim nor to a
documentation of the original injury and its circumstances. This doctor who knows how to fix a broken leg. As Adelson noted: “If a
application of the proximate injury in delayed deaths is not only wound not necessarily fatal, leads to the development of septic or
applied to homicides. Delayed deaths due to injuries regardless of other complications which terminate fatally, the person causing such
the circumstances (accidents, suicides) also are certified with this a wound is responsible for the death as though the wound he
method. inflicted were necessarily fatal. Nor will the fact that the victim
might have recovered had a neglected wound been properly treated paralysis following gunshot wounds of the spinal cord; seizures
relieve an assailant of responsibility for causing the death if the following blunt head injuries; and small bowel incarceration/hernia
original injury was feloniously inflicted.”8 Contrariwise, if a “wound following stab wounds. In making consistent and accurate cause of
is not mortal and death results from an independent cause,” then this death determinations in delayed homicides, it is important to rely
is an example of an efficient intervening cause and the death would upon the definition of proximate cause of death.
not be certified as homicide.8
The morbidity and mortality associated with both paraplegia REFERENCES
and quadriplegia are well described in the medical literature.9,10 1. Cordner SM. Deciding the cause of death after necropsy. Lancet. 1993;341:
Studies on paraplegics and quadriplegics have demonstrated long- 1458 –1460.
term survival. A study of nonventilator-dependent patients who 2. Hanzlick R, Goodin J. Mind your manners. Part III: individual scenario
survived a traumatic spinal cord injury (without concurrent moder- results and discussion of the National Association of Medical Examiners
ate or severe brain injury) incurred between 25 and 34 years of age Manner of Death Questionnaire, 1995. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997;18:
228 –245.
in Ontario, had a median survival of 38 years postinjury.10 They also
3. Hanzlick R. The Medical Cause of Death Manual. Northfield, IL: College of
found a difference in the median survival time for paraplegics and American Pathologists; 1994.
quadriplegics (41 vs. 32 years postinjury). Factors that affect mor-
4. Gill JR, Goldfeder LB, Hirsch CS. Use of “therapeutic complication” as a
tality include age at the time of injury and year of injury. Injury at manner of death. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:1127–1133.
younger ages experience better survival outcomes and, due to 5. Adams VI, Flomenbaum MA, Hirsch CS. Trauma and disease. In: Spitz WU,
treatment improvements, injuries that occurred after the early 1970s ed. Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death. 4th ed. Springfield,
also have a decreased mortality. There have been conflicting data on MA: Charles C Thomas; 2006:436 – 459.
whether the vertebral level of injury predicts mortality.10 A study in 6. Stephens JER. Insurance against Fire-Earthquake-Fire not being on Plaintiff’s
Great Britain examined long-term survival in over 3000 individuals Premises. Supreme Court Decisions of Jamaica and Privy Council Decisions
From 1774 –1923. London: C. F. Roworth; 1924:963–971.
with spinal cord injuries that occurred over a 50-year period.9 They
7. Medical Certification of Cause of Death: Instructions for Physicians on Use
found the top 3 “causes” of death were: pulmonary infection, urinary of the International Form of Medical Certificate of the Cause of Death.
system complications, and heart disease. Men were 75% more likely Geneva: World Health Organization; 1958.
than women to die of urinary system disease. Our data show a high 8. Adelson L. Pathology of Homicide. 1st ed. Springfield, MA: Charles C.
number of infection deaths in the patients with paralysis. Decreased Thomas; 1974:854.
ambulation affects many aspects of the body including the cardio- 9. Frankel HL, Coll JR, Charlifue SW, et al. Long-term survival in spinal cord
pulmonary system (deconditioning11), skin integrity, and genitouri- injury: a fifty year investigation. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:266 –274.
nary dysfunction with the chronic need for bladder catheterization. 10. McColl MA, Walker J, Stirling P, et al. Expectations of life and health among
Infections due to chronic bladder catheterization are a well-de- spinal cord injured adults. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:818 – 828.
scribed complication in patients with spinal cord injuries.12–15 11. Natelson BH, Goldwater DJ, De Roshia C, et al. Visceral predictors of
cardiovascular deconditioning in late middle-aged men. Aviat Space Environ
Posttraumatic seizures are a well recognized complication of Med. 1985;56:199 –203.
brain injury.16 –19 Posttraumatic seizures are categorized as early
12. Dewire DM, Owens RS, Anderson GA, et al. A comparison of the urological
(within one week of the injury) and late (after 1 week). Annegers et complications associated with long-term management of quadriplegics with
al studied over 4500 children and adults with traumatic brain and without chronic indwelling urinary catheters. J Urol. 1992;147:1069 –
injury.16 They found significant risk factors for later seizures in- 1071; discussion 1071–1072.
cluded brain contusion with subdural hematoma, skull fracture, loss 13. Hung EW, Darouiche RO, Trautner BW. Proteus bacteriuria is associated
of consciousness or amnesia for more than 1 day, and an age of 65 with significant morbidity in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:616 –
620.
years or older. Seizures following penetrating war injuries also have
14. Kunin CM. Genitourinary infections in the patient at risk: extrinsic risk
been reported.19 The risk of posttraumatic seizures after severe head factors. Am J Med. 1984;76:131–139.
injury is 7.1% within the first year and 11.5% within 5 years.18 15. McLeod JW, Mason JM, Neill RW, et al. Survey of the different urinary
Approximately 5.5% of all patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy have infections which develop in the paraplegic and their relative significance.
a history of head trauma and the incidence of having at least one late Paraplegia. 1965;3:124 –143.
seizure in patients treated for a head injury is about 2%.17,18 The risk 16. Annegers JF, Hauser WA, Coan SP, et al. A population-based study of
of developing posttraumatic seizures extends for years following the seizures after traumatic brain injuries. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:20 –24.
injury with approximately 50% occurring within the first year after 17. Hirsch CS, Armbrustmacher V. Trauma of the nervous system. In: Spitz WU,
the injury.19 ed. Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death. 4th ed. Springfield,
IL: Charles C. Thomas; 2006:994 –1077.
In summary, this is a series of 42 delayed homicides over a
18. Annegers JF, Grabow JD, Groover RV, et al. Seizures after head trauma: a
2-year period in a large metropolitan medical examiner jurisdiction. population study. Neurology. 1980;30:683– 689.
To our knowledge, a previous series of delayed homicides has not 19. Salazar AM, Jabbari B, Vance SC, et al. Epilepsy after penetrating head
been reported. Common scenarios of delayed homicides include: injury. I. Clinical correlates: a report of the Vietnam Head Injury Study.
infected decubitus ulcers, bronchopneumonia, and urosepsis due to Neurology. 1985;35:1406 –1414.