NA To Sls en 1992-1-1
NA To Sls en 1992-1-1
NA To Sls en 1992-1-1
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
Attached Amd 1 (AMD 522)
Gr. 8
Copyright Reserved
SRI LANKA STANDARDS INSTITUTION
17, Victoria Place
Elvitigala Mawatha
Colombo 8
Sri Lanka Standards are subject to periodical
revision in order to accommodate the progress
made by industry. Suggestions for improvement
will be recorded and brought to the notice of the
Committees to which the revisions are
entrusted.
© SLSI 2013
All right reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in
writing from the SLSI.
Committees responsible for this National Annex
The preparation of this National Annex was entrusted by Committee SC35/WG/12, upon which the following
bodies were represented:
INTRODUCTION
This National Annex has been prepared by the Working group on the development of the National Annexes to
Euro Codes (SC35/WG/12), structural use of concrete. It is to be used in conjunction with SLS EN 1992-1-
1:2012.
This National Annex was approved by the Sectoral Committee on Building and Construction Materials and
was authorized for adoption and publication as a Sri Lanka National Annex by the Council of the Sri Lanka
Standards Institution on 2013-10-02.
NA.1 SCOPE
This National Annex gives Sri Lanka decisions for the Nationally Determined Parameters described in the
following sub clauses of SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012:
— 2.3.3 (3) — 4.4.1.3 (4) — 6.4.3 (6) — 9.2.1.3 (1) — 11.3.5 (1)P
— 2.4.2.1 (1) — 5.1.3 (1)P — 6.4.4 (1) — 9.2.1.4 (1) — 11.3.5 (2)P
— 2.4.2.2 (1) — 5.2 (5) — 6.4.5 (3) — 9.2.2 (4) — 11.3.7 (1)
— 2.4.2.2 (2) — 5.5 (4) — 6.4.5 (4) — 9.2.2 (5) — 11.6.1 (1)
— 2.4.2.2 (3) — 5.6.3 (4) — 6.5.2 (2) — 9.2.2 (6) — 11.6.1 (2)
— 2.4.2.3 (1) — 5.8.3.1 (1) — 6.5.4 (4) — 9.2.2 (7) — 11.6.2 (1)
— 2.4.2.4 (1) — 5.8.3.3 (1) — 6.5.4 (6) — 9.2.2 (8) — 11.6.4.1 (1)
— 2.4.2.4 (2) — 5.8.3.3 (2) — 6.8.4 (1) — 9.3.1.1 (3) — 12.3.1 (1)
— 2.4.2.5 (2) — 5.8.5 (1) — 6.8.4 (5) — 9.5.2 (1) — 12.6.3 (2)
— 3.1.2 (2)P — 5.8.6 (3) — 6.8.6 (1) — 9.5.2 (2) — A.2.1 (1)
— 3.1.2 (4) — 5.10.1 (6) — 6.8.6 (3) — 9.5.2 (3) — A.2.1 (2)
— 3.1.6 (1)P — 5.10.2.1 (1)P — 6.8.7 (1) — 9.5.3 (3) — A.2.2 (1)
— 3.1.6 (2)P — 5.10.2.1 (2) — 7.2 (2) — 9.6.2 (1) — A.2.2 (2)
— 3.2.2 (3)P — 5.10.2.2 (4) — 7.2 (3) — 9.6.3 (1) — A.2.3 (1)
— 3.2.7 (2) — 5.10.2.2 (5) — 7.2 (5) — 9.7 (1) — C.1 (1)
— 3.3.4 (5) — 5.10.3 (2) — 7.3.1 (5) — 9.8.1 (3) — C.1 (3)Note 1
— 3.3.6 (7) — 5.10.8 (2) — 7.3.2 (4) — 9.8.2.1 (1) — C.1 (3)Note 2
— 4.4.1.2 (3) — 5.10.8 (3) — 7.3.4 (3) — 9.8.3 (1) — E.1 (2)
— 4.4.1.2 (5) — 5.10.9 (1)P — 7.4.2 (2) — 9.8.3 (2) — J.1 (3)
— 4.4.1.2 (6) — 6.2.2 (1) — 8.2 (2) — 9.8.4 (1) — J.2.2 (2)
— 4.4.1.2 (7) — 6.2.2 (6) — 8.3 (2) — 9.8.5 (3) — J.3 (2)
— 4.4.1.2 (8) — 6.2.3 (2) — 8.6 (2) — 9.10.2.2 (2) — J.3 (3)
— 4.4.1.2 (13) — 6.2.3 (3) — 8.8 (1) — 9.10.2.3 (3)
— 4.4.1.3 (1)P — 6.2.4 (4) — 9.2.1.1 (1) — 9.10.2.3 (4)
— 4.4.1.3 (3) — 6.2.4 (6) — 9.2.1.1 (3) — 9.10.2.4 (2)
Sri Lanka decisions for the nationally determined parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 are given
in Table NA.1.
3
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 – Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012
Sub clause Nationally Determined Parameter Eurocode recommendation Sri Lanka Decision
2.3.3 (3) Value of djoint 30 m 50 m
2.4.2.1 (1) Partial factor for shrinkage action γSH 1.0 Use the recommended value
2.4.2.2 (1) Partial factor for prestress γP, fav 1.0 Use the recommended value
2.4.2.2 (2) Partial factor for prestress γP, unfav 1.3 Use the recommended value
2.4.2.2 (3) Partial factor for prestress γp, unfav for 1.2 Use the recommended value
local effects
2.4.2.3 (1) Partial factor for fatigue loads γF, fat 1.0 Use the recommended value
2.4.2.4 (1) Partial factors for materials for Table 2.1N Use the recommended value
ultimate limit states γC and γS
2.4.2.4 (2) Partial factors for materials for 1.0 Use the recommended value
serviceability limit states γC and γs
2.4.2.5 (2) Value of kf 1.1 Use the recommended value
3.1.2 (2) P Value of Cmax C90/105 Use the recommended value. However, the shear strength
of concrete classes higher than C50/60 should be
determined by tests, unless there is evidence of
satisfactory past performance of the particular mix
including the type of aggregates used. Alternatively,
shear strength of concrete strength classes higher than
C50/60 may be limited to that of C50/60.
3.1.2 (4) Value of kt 0.85 Use the recommended value
3.1.6 (1) P Value of αcc 1.0 0.85(for all phenomena)
3.1.6 (2) P Value of αct 1.0 Use the recommended value
3.2.2 (3) P Upper limit of fyk 600 MPa 500 MPa
3.2.7 (2) Design assumptions for 0.9εuk Use the recommended value
reinforcement : value of εud
3.3.4 (5) Value of k 1.1 Use the recommended value
3.3.6 (7) Design assumptions for prestressing 0.9εuk or if more accurate Use the recommended values
tendons: value of εud values are not known:
εud =0.02
fpO.lk/fpk = 0.9
4
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 – Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012(continued)
5
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 – Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
6
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 – Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
7
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 – Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012(continued)
8
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 – Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
Sub clause Nationally Determined Parameter Eurocode recommendation Sri Lanka Decision
6.2.3 (3) Values of v1 and αcw v1= v as described by Use the recommended values
Expression (6.3N) or takes the values given in
Expressions (6.10.aN) and (6.10.bN)
αcw takes the values given in Expressions
(6.11 aN), (6.11.bN) and (6.11 cN)
6.2.4 (4) Range of values of cotθ f 1.0 ≤ cotθf ≤ 2.0 for compression flanges Use the recommended value
1.0 ≤ cotθf ≤ 1.25 for tension flanges
6.2.4 (6) Value of k 0.4 Use the recommended value
6.4.3 (6) Values of β β = 1.5 for a corner column Use the recommended values
β = 1.4 for an edge column
β = 1.15 for an internal column
6.4.4 (1) Values of CRd,c, vmin and k 1 for punching shear CRd,c = 0.18/γc Use the recommended values
vmin = 0.035 k 3/2fck1/2 (refer also to 3.1.2 (2)P for a
k 1 = 0.1 requirement for concrete class
> C50/60)
6.4.5 (3) The value of maximum punching resistance VRd,max = 0.5vfcd Use the recommended value
adjacent to column VRd,max
6.4.5 (4) The distance kd of the outer perimeter of punching k = 1.5 k = 1.5 unless the perimeter at
shear reinforcement from the perimeter Uout which the reinforcement is no
longer required is less than 3d
from the face of the loaded
area/column. In this case the
reinforcement should be placed
in the zone 0.3d and 1.5d from
the face of the column.
6.5.2 (2) Value of v’ v’ = 1 - fck/250 Use the recommended value
6.5.4 (4) Value of k1, k2, k3 k1 = 1.0 Use the recommended values
k2 = 0.85
k3 = 0.75
6.5.4 (6) Value of k 4 k 4 = 3.0 Use the recommended value
9
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 – Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
Sub clause Nationally Determined Parameter Eurocode recommendation Sri Lanka Decision
6.8.4 (1) Values of γF,fat and parameters for S-N curves γF,fat = 1.0 Use the recommended values
10
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 – Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012(continued)
Sub clause Nationally Determined Parameter Eurocode recommendation Sri Lanka Decision
8.6 (2) Anchorage capacity of a welded bar Fbtd = ltdøtσtd ≤ Fwd Use the recommended value
8.8 (1) Additional rules for large ølarge > 32 mm Use the recommended value
diameter bars: limiting bar size
9.2.1.1 (1) Beams: minimum reinforcement areas As,min = 0.26(fctm/fyk)btd ≥ 0.001 3btd Use the recommended value
9.2.1.1 (3) Beams: maximum reinforcement areas As,max = 0.04Ac Use the recommended value
9.2.1.3 (1) Beams: minimum ratio of span bending moment to be β1 = 0.15 β1 = 0.3
assumed at supports in monolithic construction
9.2.1.4 (1) Anchorage of bottom reinforcement at an end support: area β2 = 0.25 β1 = 0.3
of steel provided over supports with little or no
end fixity in design
9.2.2 (4) Minimum ratio of shear reinforcement in the form of links β3 = 0.5 Use the recommended value
9.2.2 (5) Minimum shear reinforcement ρw,min = (0.08√fck)/ fyk Use the recommended value
9.2.2 (6) Maximum longitudinal spacing of shear assemblies sl,max = 0.75d(1 + cotα) Use the recommended value
9.2.2 (7) Maximum longitudinal spacing of bent-up bars sb,max = 0.6d (1 + cotα) Use the recommended value
11
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 — Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
12
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 — Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
13
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 — Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
14
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 — Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
C.1 (3) Note 2 Values of a for determination of fyk, k, εuk Minimum and maximum values for fyk, Use the recommended values
k, εuk in accordance with Table C.3N
15
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.1 — Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in SLS EN 1992-1-1:2012 (continued)
J.2.2 (2) Values of tanθ 0.4 ≤ tanθ ≤ 1 Use the recommended value
J.3 (2) Value of k1 0.25 Use the recommended value
J.3 (3) Value of k2 0.5 Use the recommended value
16
NA to SLS EN 1992-1-1:2013
TABLE NA.3 – Basic ratios of span/effective depth for reinforced concrete members without axial compression
Cantilever 0.4 6 8
NOTE :
1. The values given have been chosen to be generally conservative and calculation may frequently show that thinner
members are possible.
2. For two-way spanning slabs, the check should be carried out on the basis of the shorter span. For flat slabs the longer
span should be taken.
3. The limits given for flat slabs correspond to a less severe limitation than a mid-span deflection of span/250 relative to
the columns. Experience has shown this to be satisfactory.
4. The values of k in the table may not be appropriate when the formwork is struck at an early age or when the construction
loads exceed the design load. In these cases, the deflections may have to be calculated using advice in specialist literature,
e.g the Concrete Society’s report on deflections in concrete slabs and beams [1] and an article for the Magazine of
Concrete Research entitled “ Are existing span to depth rules conservative for flat slabs?” [2]
5. The ratio of area of reinforcement provided to that required should be limited to 1.5 when the span/depth ratio is
adjusted. This limit also applies to any adjustments to span/depth ratio obtained from Expressions (7.16a) or (7.16b) from
which this table has been derived for concrete class C30/37.
1 — Deflections in concrete slabs and beams, Technical Report No.58, Concrete Society 2005.
2 —VOLLUM, R.L. and T.R. HOSSAIN, Are existing span t depth rules conservative for flat slabs?, Magazine of Concrete Research, vol. 54, issue 6,
2002.
……………………………../……………………………….
17
AMD NO.522: 2019
Page 13
TABLE NA.1 — Sri Lanka decisions for Nationally Determined Parameters described in
SLS EN 1992
Delete the entire row of sub-clause 9.6.2 (1) and substitute the following row.