Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 80 views

    Curriculum Development Assignment No.2

    Uploaded by

    SherCabs
    The document summarizes two articles critiqued by Sherwin Cabanlet. For the first article on the evolution of education from 1.0 to 4.0, Cabanlet agrees that it is an evolution due to adaptive learning and innovation, but disagrees that it could lead to passive learners. For the second article on enhancing the Philippine curriculum, Cabanlet agrees that K-12 aims to meet international standards and develop student interests, but disagrees that the current curriculum lacks time and K-12 could worsen education problems due to additional costs and drop-outs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Curriculum Development Assignment No.2

    Uploaded by

    SherCabs
    80 views2 pages
    The document summarizes two articles critiqued by Sherwin Cabanlet. For the first article on the evolution of education from 1.0 to 4.0, Cabanlet agrees that it is an evolution due to adaptive learning and innovation, but disagrees that it could lead to passive learners. For the second article on enhancing the Philippine curriculum, Cabanlet agrees that K-12 aims to meet international standards and develop student interests, but disagrees that the current curriculum lacks time and K-12 could worsen education problems due to additional costs and drop-outs.

    Original Description:

    curDev assignment

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes two articles critiqued by Sherwin Cabanlet. For the first article on the evolution of education from 1.0 to 4.0, Cabanlet agrees that it is an evolution due to adaptive learning and innovation, but disagrees that it could lead to passive learners. For the second article on enhancing the Philippine curriculum, Cabanlet agrees that K-12 aims to meet international standards and develop student interests, but disagrees that the current curriculum lacks time and K-12 could worsen education problems due to additional costs and drop-outs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    80 views2 pages

    Curriculum Development Assignment No.2

    Uploaded by

    SherCabs
    The document summarizes two articles critiqued by Sherwin Cabanlet. For the first article on the evolution of education from 1.0 to 4.0, Cabanlet agrees that it is an evolution due to adaptive learning and innovation, but disagrees that it could lead to passive learners. For the second article on enhancing the Philippine curriculum, Cabanlet agrees that K-12 aims to meet international standards and develop student interests, but disagrees that the current curriculum lacks time and K-12 could worsen education problems due to additional costs and drop-outs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    SHERWIN L.

    CABANLET
    MAEd-2

    ASSIGNMENT NO. 2

    Articles/Studies Critique

    Article No. 1 – The Evolution of Education from Education 1.0 to Education 4.0: Is it an
    Evolution or a Revolution?

    Points of Agreement:

    1. It is an evolution because it is an innovation producing education where it is an


    adaptive learning driven. The learning process will be based on real-time student
    profiles.

    2. It is evolution because it is built through selective individual and learning-driven


    embodiments in practice by focusing on innovation. The input of learnings as a source
    of technology evolution in the service of innovation production.

    Points of Disagreement:

    1. It is not an evolution instead it is a revolution because it leads to the type of learners


    that are passive. It somehow repeat the same practices in education system in dealing
    with the teaching – learning process.

    2. It is not an evolution because there are technological materials and equipment being
    purchased at great cost but was not really used widely.
    Article No. 2 – Enhancing Curriculum in Philippine Schools in Response to Global Community
    Challenges.

    Points of Agreement:

    1. The K to 12 is aimed at addressing the deficiency of the Philippine educational system


    particularly in the basic education, the elementary and high school, in order to meet the
    standards of the international education criteria and for the students to be at par with
    the students in neighboring countries.

    2. According to the Department of Education discussion paper (2010), the K t0 12


    curriculum aims to enable every child “to achieve mastery of core competencies and
    skills” and develop tracks based on the student’s interests and competencies.

    Points of Disagreement:

    1. The existing curriculum nowadays is described as congested. It means to say that our
    learners do not get enough and appropriate time to perform tasks because the curriculum
    is designed to be taught in a span of 12 years and not 10 years. The more evident result
    of this is the fact that most high school students graduate without the readiness to take
    upon higher education or employment. These students are not equipped with the basic
    skills or competencies needed at work.

    2. The K to 12 program is “flawed and problematic framework” which will worsen the
    education crisis and will further subject the nation’s workers to exploitation. According
    to Vencer Crisostomo, the national chairperson of Anakbayan that the additional years
    in the K to 12 program will mean additional burden to parents and students who at
    present are already struggling to finish the current cycle. “At present, 14 out 100 finish
    the education cycle up to college. Additional years will mean additional drop-outs,” he
    said. He also points out the lack of budget for education currently. “Government
    spending for education, as it is, is not enough to meet the shortages at present. The
    shortages will worsen and we will be faced with greater problems,” he says.

    You might also like